Reader Comments (208)

Post a new comment on this article

• 0 Responses
  03 Sep 2021
  04:02 GMT
  Most Recent
  Great brings back confidences in PLOS Posted by afauzi997 on 03 Sep 2021 at 04:02 GMT
• 1 Response
  03 Sep 2017
  11:01 GMT
  Most Recent
  The link between biochemical architecture and hand coordination was explained and its Inventor is the inventor of the Creator. So what? Posted by TheMatrixDNA on 16 Mar 2016 at 14:21 GMT
• 1 Response
  10 Jul 2017
  14:31 GMT
  Most Recent
  Response about the decision by PLoS ONE Posted by Mingjin on 29 Mar 2016 at 08:35 GMT
• 0 Responses
  24 Mar 2016
  02:34 GMT
  Most Recent
  A huge mountain made out of a molehill Posted by dwwitzell on 24 Mar 2016 at 02:34 GMT
• 0 Responses
  18 Mar 2016
  21:56 GMT
  Most Recent
  RETRACT THE RETRACTION Posted by Anna_Ann on 18 Mar 2016 at 21:56 GMT
• 4 Responses
  17 Mar 2016
  09:38 GMT
  Most Recent
  The Academic Editor of this paper, Renzhi Han, has been removed from the editorial board of PLOS ONE Posted by Klaas_van_Dijk on 13 Mar 2016 at 09:17 GMT
• 2 Responses
  14 Mar 2016
  13:14 GMT
  Most Recent
  Thanks for the revealing retraction Posted by Kanbei85 on 08 Mar 2016 at 13:51 GMT
• 1 Response
  09 Mar 2016
  23:05 GMT
  Most Recent
  Poor Form and Invalid Peer Review Posted by politicoid on 08 Mar 2016 at 13:38 GMT
• 0 Responses
  09 Mar 2016
  17:56 GMT
  Most Recent
  Design and Coordination Posted by Jbailon on 09 Mar 2016 at 17:56 GMT
• 0 Responses
  08 Mar 2016
  00:58 GMT
  Most Recent
  PloS One owes the authors an apology. Posted by indevus on 08 Mar 2016 at 00:58 GMT
• 1 Response
  07 Mar 2016
  16:00 GMT
  Most Recent
  Should papers mentioning 'yin' and 'yang' be retracted, too? Posted by audreyqyfu on 07 Mar 2016 at 03:49 GMT
• 1 Response
  07 Mar 2016
  10:36 GMT
  Most Recent
  you owe the Chinese authors for a rational explanation Posted by laomao on 07 Mar 2016 at 10:33 GMT
• 1 Response
  06 Mar 2016
  22:55 GMT
  Most Recent
  The retraction is partly due to cultural ignorance. Posted by yingyang02 on 05 Mar 2016 at 02:59 GMT
• 1 Response
  06 Mar 2016
  22:12 GMT
  Most Recent
  Should science not be an instrument to understand better who we are? Posted by fixundfoxi1 on 05 Mar 2016 at 09:20 GMT
• 70 Responses
  06 Mar 2016
  01:42 GMT
  Most Recent
  Notification from PLOS Staff Posted by PLOS_ONE_Group on 02 Mar 2016 at 18:56 GMT
• 1 Response
  05 Mar 2016
  19:42 GMT
  Most Recent
  Retraction seems to have been done without consulting the authors Posted by KipHansen on 05 Mar 2016 at 18:32 GMT
• 0 Responses
  05 Mar 2016
  16:15 GMT
  Most Recent
  PLOS one is a WATER journal, All the Chinese scientists should resist this funny journal Posted by xxxiong on 05 Mar 2016 at 16:15 GMT
• 0 Responses
  05 Mar 2016
  12:35 GMT
  Most Recent
  Also pone.0040808 must be retracted to underline that PLOS never shows partial behaviour. Posted by Klaas_van_Dijk on 05 Mar 2016 at 12:35 GMT
• 0 Responses
  05 Mar 2016
  11:20 GMT
  Most Recent
  Retraction is not enough... Posted by bloppin on 05 Mar 2016 at 11:20 GMT
• 2 Responses
  05 Mar 2016
  08:10 GMT
  Most Recent
  Insenstivity to speakers of foreign languages Posted by loswald on 05 Mar 2016 at 04:16 GMT
• 0 Responses
  05 Mar 2016
  06:11 GMT
  Most Recent
  Punishment or Retraction? Posted by Rafsanjani on 05 Mar 2016 at 06:11 GMT
• 0 Responses
  05 Mar 2016
  03:51 GMT
  Most Recent
  An interesting case of cultural awareness Posted by jinghuxian on 05 Mar 2016 at 03:51 GMT
• 0 Responses
  04 Mar 2016
  20:41 GMT
  Most Recent
  A robotic article of interest? Posted by Boötes on 04 Mar 2016 at 20:41 GMT
• 18 Responses
  04 Mar 2016
  20:33 GMT
  Most Recent
  Follow-up Notification from PLOS Staff Posted by PLOS_ONE_Group on 03 Mar 2016 at 19:45 GMT
• 0 Responses
  04 Mar 2016
  20:30 GMT
  Most Recent
  Much Ado Posted by cwjones2 on 04 Mar 2016 at 20:30 GMT
• 0 Responses
  04 Mar 2016
  16:11 GMT
  Most Recent
  The hand points to the Creator! Posted by Unscripted on 04 Mar 2016 at 16:11 GMT
• 2 Responses
  04 Mar 2016
  15:39 GMT
  Most Recent
  Sir Isaac Newton once said Posted by Otangelo1 on 04 Mar 2016 at 01:43 GMT
• 0 Responses
  04 Mar 2016
  10:29 GMT
  Most Recent
  Retraction should be just the first step Posted by marmello77 on 04 Mar 2016 at 10:29 GMT
• 3 Responses
  04 Mar 2016
  04:22 GMT
  Most Recent
  A shameful act Posted by Eleni_Asouti on 03 Mar 2016 at 23:18 GMT
• 0 Responses
  04 Mar 2016
  03:53 GMT
  Most Recent
  Is this graffiti? Posted by JeremyShearman on 04 Mar 2016 at 03:53 GMT
• 2 Responses
  04 Mar 2016
  00:47 GMT
  Most Recent
  Response about the incorrected use of the word Posted by Mingjin on 03 Mar 2016 at 12:10 GMT
• 0 Responses
  04 Mar 2016
  00:46 GMT
  Most Recent
  Zaohua 'the Creator' issue Posted by rodo on 04 Mar 2016 at 00:46 GMT
• 2 Responses
  04 Mar 2016
  00:34 GMT
  Most Recent
  Popper, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing. Posted by NeuroSheldon on 03 Mar 2016 at 12:05 GMT
• 2 Responses
  04 Mar 2016
  00:23 GMT
  Most Recent
  A word of indignation Posted by paleosp on 03 Mar 2016 at 13:48 GMT
• 1 Response
  04 Mar 2016
  00:15 GMT
  Most Recent
  Perhaps best to leave the article as published Posted by cjanis on 02 Mar 2016 at 21:52 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  20:35 GMT
  Most Recent
  Cross-cultural communication breakdown? Posted by devilsadvocate2 on 03 Mar 2016 at 20:35 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  20:23 GMT
  Most Recent
  Improper Posted by burkayozturk9 on 03 Mar 2016 at 20:23 GMT
• 1 Response
  03 Mar 2016
  20:21 GMT
  Most Recent
  Further information would be useful Posted by Protohedgehog on 03 Mar 2016 at 20:13 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  19:36 GMT
  Most Recent
  one word: shameful Posted by polgy on 03 Mar 2016 at 19:36 GMT
• 2 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  19:23 GMT
  Most Recent
  career Posted by Hapis_82 on 03 Mar 2016 at 16:08 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  19:02 GMT
  Most Recent
  this paper should be retracted immediately Posted by danrusso on 03 Mar 2016 at 19:02 GMT
• 1 Response
  03 Mar 2016
  18:55 GMT
  Most Recent
  the article is ok, but it is missing an important reference Posted by l_yampolsky on 02 Mar 2016 at 23:10 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  17:08 GMT
  Most Recent
  Alas, it's not a hoax Posted by RajaChatila on 03 Mar 2016 at 17:08 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  17:03 GMT
  Most Recent
  Nonscientific paper Posted by Fabrício on 03 Mar 2016 at 17:03 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  16:50 GMT
  Most Recent
  Please correct this mistake Posted by TeBi89 on 03 Mar 2016 at 16:50 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  16:35 GMT
  Most Recent
  Creator article Posted by thigham on 03 Mar 2016 at 16:35 GMT
• 9 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  16:29 GMT
  Most Recent
  Response about the incorrected use of the word Posted by Mingjin on 03 Mar 2016 at 12:13 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  15:54 GMT
  Most Recent
  Extremely distressing oversight. Posted by scaruso on 03 Mar 2016 at 15:54 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  15:30 GMT
  Most Recent
  Embarrassment Posted by Joffa on 03 Mar 2016 at 15:30 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  14:48 GMT
  Most Recent
  A reference needed... Posted by MichelRaymond on 03 Mar 2016 at 14:48 GMT
• 1 Response
  03 Mar 2016
  14:21 GMT
  Most Recent
  Predatory journal Posted by Mabortolini on 03 Mar 2016 at 13:55 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  14:19 GMT
  Most Recent
  Not science Posted by mdcsilva on 03 Mar 2016 at 14:19 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  14:16 GMT
  Most Recent
  Scholarship, not Publishing, must win. Posted by MichaelCaldwell on 03 Mar 2016 at 14:16 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  14:01 GMT
  Most Recent
  Who is the Creator? Posted by rovaris on 03 Mar 2016 at 14:01 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  13:59 GMT
  Most Recent
  Mao Ts�- Tung Posted by Mabortolini on 03 Mar 2016 at 13:59 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  13:53 GMT
  Most Recent
  Horrifying Posted by panthera on 03 Mar 2016 at 13:53 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  13:10 GMT
  Most Recent
  Is Plos One a Science Journal of not? Posted by cmartinsunesp on 03 Mar 2016 at 13:10 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  12:46 GMT
  Most Recent
  Unacceptable in a scientific journal Posted by anxo1 on 03 Mar 2016 at 12:46 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  11:23 GMT
  Most Recent
  The explanation is far from to be science! Posted by valentegt on 03 Mar 2016 at 11:23 GMT
• 6 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  11:08 GMT
  Most Recent
  What is the relation between ""the Creator"" and this study? Posted by JasonFriedman on 15 Feb 2016 at 15:27 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  11:00 GMT
  Most Recent
  No rush, please! Posted by robertkraus on 03 Mar 2016 at 11:00 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  10:28 GMT
  Most Recent
  Not just about the "Creator" stuff Posted by Beagle on 03 Mar 2016 at 10:28 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  10:09 GMT
  Most Recent
  Conflict of Interest (The Creator (tm))? Posted by Tobias-P on 03 Mar 2016 at 10:09 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  08:36 GMT
  Most Recent
  Out from Science Posted by abertran on 03 Mar 2016 at 08:36 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  07:02 GMT
  Most Recent
  This paper should be retracted immediately Posted by Pim on 03 Mar 2016 at 07:02 GMT
• 0 Responses
  03 Mar 2016
  04:11 GMT
  Most Recent
  Well, for starters Posted by VovikSlalom on 03 Mar 2016 at 04:11 GMT
• 0 Responses
  02 Mar 2016
  20:28 GMT
  Most Recent
  Retract this article or I resign as an Editor Posted by thermalecology on 02 Mar 2016 at 20:28 GMT
• 0 Responses
  02 Mar 2016
  19:25 GMT
  Most Recent
  New Op-ed Section? Posted by danbarton on 02 Mar 2016 at 19:25 GMT
• 0 Responses
  02 Mar 2016
  19:14 GMT
  Most Recent
  about the abstract of Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living... Posted by cordoba on 02 Mar 2016 at 19:14 GMT
• 0 Responses
  02 Mar 2016
  18:21 GMT
  Most Recent
  Throwing out Paley's clock Posted by rmtakata on 02 Mar 2016 at 18:21 GMT
• 0 Responses
  02 Mar 2016
  18:10 GMT
  Most Recent
  This article is full of baseless claims, and should be retracted Posted by PaulWennekes on 02 Mar 2016 at 18:10 GMT
• 0 Responses
  02 Mar 2016
  13:17 GMT
  Most Recent
  Statements in scientific papers must be supported by evidence Posted by ByronWan on 02 Mar 2016 at 13:17 GMT
• 0 Responses
  02 Mar 2016
  11:25 GMT
  Most Recent
  Proper design by the Creator? Posted by LeonidSchneider on 02 Mar 2016 at 11:25 GMT