Reader Comments

Post a new comment on this article

Thanks for the revealing retraction

Posted by Kanbei85 on 08 Mar 2016 at 13:51 GMT

By retracting this article for 'inappropriate language', you've just shown the world exactly how far 'behind the Iron Curtain' the world of secular academia has now fallen. Thank you so much, because you've just provided incontrovertible proof to the world that free debate and exchange is NOT open on the topic of the Creator, and any reference to a Creator will not be tolerated.

No competing interests declared.

RE: Thanks for the revealing retraction

canofuncanny replied to Kanbei85 on 09 Mar 2016 at 23:03 GMT

Free debate and exchange is certainly open on the topic of supernatural entities... just not in this particular forum. Such claims have no place in a scientific journal because they are not falsifiable and cannot be disproven.

No competing interests declared.

RE: RE: Thanks for the revealing retraction

Kanbei85 replied to canofuncanny on 14 Mar 2016 at 13:14 GMT

Sorry, but that's a double standard. The claims of Darwinism about events spanning millions of years in the non-repeatable, non-observable past are ALSO not falsifiable; the history of Darwinism has proven this, as the theory has been constantly rewritten to attempt to 'account' for the consistent failure of the evidence to support the theory. This is nothing more than blatant censorship to maintain the hegemony of the 'ruling paradigm', which cannot stand on its own-- the evidence fails to support Darwinian naturalism. Those responsible will one day be held to account for what they've done.

No competing interests declared.