Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closePerhaps best to leave the article as published
Posted by cjanis on 02 Mar 2016 at 21:52 GMT
Actually this article could extremely important in the battle against creationism. The conclusion of the authors is their interpretation of the data, not necessarily something that the data actually show: but the publication of such an article clearly puts paid to the assertion that no creationists are "allowed" to present their views in scientific journals. Now their conclusions can be dealt with by the scientific community, and the whinging about censorship can itself be silenced.
RE: Perhaps best to leave the article as published
WallaceSouza replied to cjanis on 04 Mar 2016 at 00:15 GMT
Well, the data also does not show any shred of supporting evidence for theory of evolution, despite of the artificial attempts at conciliating scientific data with the outdated and failed theory of evolution.