Concerns about this article’s [1] findings and conclusions were raised in [2], and a response was subsequently published in [3]. The PLOS Biology Editors have re-evaluated the scientific validity of [1] in light of issues discussed in [2,3], and concluded that concerns raised about the analyses shown in Fig 4 of [1] undermine confidence in the article’s conclusions that cockle dredging in the study area had an adverse effect on red knot populations. Furthermore, our assessment is that the response in [3] did not satisfactorily resolve the issues, although a full analysis of the reported concerns [2] and responses [3] would require additional analysis beyond the scope of our post-publication editorial assessment.
Readers are therefore advised to interpret this article’s [1] results with caution in the context of the discussion in [2,3].
References
- 1. van Gils JA, Piersma T, Dekinga A, Spaans B, Kraan C. Shellfish dredging pushes a flexible avian top predator out of a marine protected area. PLoS Biol. 2006;4(12):e376. pmid:17105350
- 2. van der Meer J, Folmer E. A re‐evaluation of the effects of mechanical cockle dredging in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Journal of Applied Ecology [Internet]. 2023;60(11):2497–504.
- 3. Piersma T, Koolhaas A, van Gils JA, Dekinga A. Cause for caution: Response to Forum Contribution by van der Meer and Folmer. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2023;60(11):2494–6.
Citation: The PLOS Biology Editors (2026) Expression of Concern: Shellfish dredging pushes a flexible avian top predator out of a marine protected area. PLoS Biol 24(4): e3003770. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003770
Published: April 22, 2026
Copyright: © 2026 The PLOS Biology Editors. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.