Peer Review History
| Original SubmissionDecember 12, 2023 |
|---|
|
Dear Shai, Thank you for submitting your manuscript entitled "Salmonella manipulates the host to drive pathogenicity via induction of interleukin 1β" for consideration as a Research Article by PLOS Biology. I've now had time to assess your revised manuscript and the responses to the Immunity reviewers, and discuss the whole file with one of our academic editors and I am writing to let you know that we would like to move to acceptance of your work after minor (textual) revisions and checks for compliance with our journal policies. However, before I can send you a decision letter detailing what we'd require for publication, we need you to complete your submission by providing the metadata that is required for full assessment. To this end, please login to Editorial Manager where you will find the paper in the 'Submissions Needing Revisions' folder on your homepage. Please click 'Revise Submission' from the Action Links and complete all additional questions in the submission questionnaire. Once your full submission is complete, your paper will undergo a series of checks in preparation for peer review. After your manuscript has passed the checks it will be come to my desk and I will be able to proceed. To provide the metadata for your submission, please Login to Editorial Manager (https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology) within two working days, i.e. by Dec 21 2023 11:59PM. This seems a bit nonsensical in this case, but stems for our easy drag-n-drop initial submission process, because we'd need this information and eg high-quality figures for peer review, and all submissions have to go through this - it should take no more than a few minutes to complete. If your manuscript lands back on my desk by EOB Thursday, then I will be bale to issue a formal decision on Friday morning - otherwise this will happen when I am back in the office in early January. During the process of completing your manuscript submission, you will be invited to opt-in to posting your pre-review manuscript as a bioRxiv preprint. Visit http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/preprints for full details. If you consent to posting your current manuscript as a preprint, please upload a single Preprint PDF. Feel free to email me if you have any queries relating to your submission, or to plosbiology@plos.org if you have problems with the "full submission" process. Kind regards, Nonia Nonia Pariente, PhD, Editor-in-Chief PLOS Biology |
| Revision 1 |
|
Dear Shai, Thank you for your patience while we considered your revised manuscript "Salmonella manipulates the host to drive pathogenicity via induction of interleukin 1β" for publication as a Research Article at PLOS Biology. This is a revised manuscript addressing the issues raised by reviewers at another journal, and you have provided us with the revision and the point by point rebuttal to the reviewer concerns. I have now had time to assess the whole file, as well as to discuss it with an Academic Editor of relevant expertise. Based on this assessment, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, provided you satisfactorily address the points indicated below: - Please expand the rather succinct introduction and discussion section to include the relevant aspects of your responses to reviewers, including a discussion of the research context and how your study adds to the existing literature (ie why it is novel, which we agree it is. You need to spell this out). Additionally, you should directly discuss Zychlinsky's paper (no increased mortality in IL1B KO mice) and why you came to a different conclusion. We have no problem with that, as you are using a completely different model (strep pretreatment). - Please add to each supplementary figure legend (except Sup Fig 1) information about how many independent experiments were performed - The Ethics statement needs to be a separate, independent (and the first) subheading in the Material & Methods section. It needs to include not only the full name of the IACUC/ethics committee that reviewed and approved the animal care and use (which you have) but also the protocol/permit/project license number (which is missing). Please include the specific national or international regulations/guidelines to which your animal care and use protocol adhered. - DATA POLICY: You may be aware of the PLOS Data Policy, which requires that all data be made available without restriction: http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/data-availability. For more information, please also see this editorial: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001797 Note that we do not require all raw data. Rather, we ask that all individual quantitative observations that underlie the data summarized in the figures and results of your paper be made available in one of the following forms: 1) Supplementary files (e.g., excel). Please ensure that all data files are uploaded as 'Supporting Information' and are invariably referred to (in the manuscript, figure legends, and the Description field when uploading your files) using the following format verbatim: S1 Data, S2 Data, etc. Multiple panels of a single or even several figures can be included as multiple sheets in one excel file that is saved using exactly the following convention: S1_Data.xlsx (using an underscore). 2) Deposition in a publicly available repository. Please also provide the accession code or a reviewer link so that we may view your data before publication. Regardless of the method selected, please ensure that you provide the individual numerical values that underlie the summary data displayed in the main and supplementary figure panels that show data (that is, all of them except Fig 7 and Supp Fig 1), as they are essential for readers to assess your analysis and to reproduce it: NOTE: the numerical data provided should include all replicates AND the way in which the plotted mean and errors were derived (it should not present only the mean/average values). It should be clearly labelled. **Please also ensure that all main and supplementary figure legends in your manuscript include information on where the underlying data can be found, eg "The underlying that for this figure can be found at [either a repository URL or the specific Supp File where that specific data is]". Please ensure your supplemental data files have a legend.** - Data Accessibility Statement (DAS): You will need to deposit all RNAseq data and 16s data to GEO at this time, as the accession number needs to be included in the manuscript before final acceptance (the information can be embargoed - but then you need to provide us with a reviewer token for access, so we can access the information before acceptance). In the new DAS, please indicate not only the accession numbers for the RNAseq and 16s data, but also where the data underlying the main and supplementary figures can be found, be it a repository or specific supplementary data files. As you address these items, please take this last chance to review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the cover letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. We expect to receive your revised manuscript by 10 January. To submit your revision, please go to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/ and log in as an Author. Click the link labelled 'Submissions Needing Revision' to find your submission record. Your revised submission must include the following: - a cover letter that should detail your responses to any editorial requests, if applicable, and whether changes have been made to the reference list - a Response to Reviewers file that provides a detailed response to the reviewers' comments (if applicable, if not applicable please do not delete your existing 'Response to Reviewers' file.) - a track-changes file indicating any changes that you have made to the manuscript. NOTE: If Supporting Information files are included with your article, note that these are not copyedited and will be published as they are submitted. Please ensure that these files are legible and of high quality (at least 300 dpi) in an easily accessible file format. For this reason, please be aware that any references listed in an SI file will not be indexed. For more information, see our Supporting Information guidelines: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/supporting-information *Published Peer Review History* Please note that you will have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. We will contact you to opt in or out. Please see here for more details: https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/05/plos-journals-now-open-for-published-peer-review/ *Press* Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, please ensure you have opted out of Early Article Posting on the submission form. We ask that you notify us as soon as possible if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. *Protocols deposition* To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely, Nonia Nonia Pariente, PhD, Editor-in-Chief, PLOS Biology |
| Revision 2 |
|
Dear Shai, Happy new year - or at least one that improves quickly. Thank you for the submission of your revised Research Article "Salmonella manipulates the host to drive pathogenicity via induction of interleukin 1β" for publication in PLOS Biology. On behalf of my colleagues and the Academic Editor, Ken Cadwell, I am pleased to say that we can in principle accept your manuscript for publication, provided you address any remaining formatting and reporting issues. These will be detailed in an email you should receive within 2-3 business days from our colleagues in the journal operations team; no action is required from you until then. Please note that we will not be able to formally accept your manuscript and schedule it for publication until you have completed any requested changes. I have noted that the GEO accession is embargoed until Dec 1, 2024 - please modify this once you become aware f the publication date. As I see that you have opted into early article posting, we will not be able to schedule publication; it will be live 2ish days after you return the proofs Please take a minute to log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information if needed to ensure an efficient production process. PRESS We frequently collaborate with press offices. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. If the press office is planning to promote your findings, we would be grateful if they could coordinate with biologypress@plos.org. If you have previously opted in to the early version process, we ask that you notify us immediately of any press plans so that we may opt out on your behalf. We also ask that you take this opportunity to read our Embargo Policy regarding the discussion, promotion and media coverage of work that is yet to be published by PLOS. As your manuscript is not yet published, it is bound by the conditions of our Embargo Policy. Please be aware that this policy is in place both to ensure that any press coverage of your article is fully substantiated and to provide a direct link between such coverage and the published work. For full details of our Embargo Policy, please visit http://www.plos.org/about/media-inquiries/embargo-policy/. Thank you again for choosing PLOS Biology for publication and supporting Open Access publishing. We look forward to publishing your study. Best, Nonia Nonia Pariente, PhD, Editor-in-Chief PLOS Biology |
Open letter on the publication of peer review reports
PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.
We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.
Learn more at ASAPbio .