Fig 1.
The mean study effect sizes reported by Clements and colleagues [4] represented as a measure of percent impairment.
In this case, the data express effect sizes as a percent decline in behavioural response as a result of ocean acidification exposure, with control values set at 100%. The grey box denotes the mean and upper and lower 95% confidence intervals (62.6 ± 5.2%; N = 91). The pink dots denote individual study means, and the purple dots denote the mean ± SEM of a given year. The solid black line denotes the meta-regression line for 2011–2018 (p = 0.03; R2 = 0.05; N = 88). All data are publicly available through Dryad under doi: 10.5061/dryad.866t1g1vr.