Embodiment of an artificial limb in mice
Fig 4
Comparison of the threat reaction with vs. without pairing.
(A) Comparison of the eye movements in the No pairing vs. the Artificial limb conditions, with both synchronous and asynchronous pairing. In the No pairing condition, during 240 s, the mice were idle, and no artifact was presented to the mouse. After this waiting period, the threat was presented. (B) Average horizontal movements of the right pupil following the threat onset, normalized relative to the average position 1 s before the threat (n = 10). Light background: SEM. Black: pupil movements in the threat-only condition without pairing. Green and Red lines: Response to synchronous/asynchronous stimulations of the artificial limb, reproduced from Fig 2E. (C) Top: difference between the horizontal eye movements in response to synchronous pairing of the artificial limb, versus no-pairing. Blue sections: significant differences (Bootstrap-based test p < 0.05). Black dashed line: significance threshold. Bottom: asynchronous pairing versus no-pairing conditions. (D) Same as B for the left pupil horizontal movements. (E) Same as C for the left pupil horizontal movements. (F) Same as A to E for the No pairing versus the Block condition.