Reader Comments (21)
Post a new comment on this article
-
0 Responses07 May 2009
22:25 GMT
Most RecentCompetition is still needed... Posted by PLOSBiology on 07 May 2009 at 22:25 GMT -
0 Responses07 May 2009
22:25 GMT
Most RecentA year later! More reflections. Posted by PLOSBiology on 07 May 2009 at 22:25 GMT -
0 Responses07 May 2009
22:20 GMT
Most RecentResponse from PLoS Biology Posted by PLOSBiology on 07 May 2009 at 22:20 GMT -
0 Responses07 May 2009
22:20 GMT
Most RecentReward, not punishment - Solving peer review problems Posted by PLOSBiology on 07 May 2009 at 22:20 GMT -
0 Responses07 May 2009
22:17 GMT
Most RecentHow about public peer review and interactive discussion? Posted by PLOSBiology on 07 May 2009 at 22:17 GMT -
0 Responses07 May 2009
22:17 GMT
Most RecentTCR: Transparency, Contribution, Responsibility Posted by PLOSBiology on 07 May 2009 at 22:17 GMT -
0 Responses07 May 2009
22:17 GMT
Most Recentquality not speed Posted by PLOSBiology on 07 May 2009 at 22:17 GMT -
0 Responses07 May 2009
22:17 GMT
Most RecentPay-to-play and sign away: combating scientific review abuses Posted by PLOSBiology on 07 May 2009 at 22:17 GMT -
0 Responses07 May 2009
22:17 GMT
Most RecentBenefits of "slow" review Posted by PLOSBiology on 07 May 2009 at 22:17 GMT -
0 Responses07 May 2009
22:17 GMT
Most Recentwhat if? Posted by PLOSBiology on 07 May 2009 at 22:17 GMT -
0 Responses07 May 2009
22:17 GMT
Most RecentWhat about the quality of reviews Posted by PLOSBiology on 07 May 2009 at 22:17 GMT -
0 Responses07 May 2009
22:16 GMT
Most RecentMoney will make it faster…………. Posted by PLOSBiology on 07 May 2009 at 22:16 GMT -
0 Responses07 May 2009
22:16 GMT
Most RecentAn alternative Incentive Solution to the Peer Review Posted by PLOSBiology on 07 May 2009 at 22:16 GMT -
0 Responses07 May 2009
22:16 GMT
Most RecentMore competition is needed Posted by PLOSBiology on 07 May 2009 at 22:16 GMT -
0 Responses07 May 2009
22:16 GMT
Most RecentDangerous! Posted by PLOSBiology on 07 May 2009 at 22:16 GMT -
0 Responses07 May 2009
22:16 GMT
Most RecentThe quick review: mission impossible! Posted by PLOSBiology on 07 May 2009 at 22:16 GMT -
0 Responses07 May 2009
22:16 GMT
Most RecentReal rewarding for good referees! Posted by PLOSBiology on 07 May 2009 at 22:16 GMT -
0 Responses07 May 2009
22:16 GMT
Most RecentFurther suggestions how to accelerate peer review Posted by PLOSBiology on 07 May 2009 at 22:16 GMT -
0 Responses07 May 2009
22:16 GMT
Most RecentAlternative proposal Posted by PLOSBiology on 07 May 2009 at 22:16 GMT -
0 Responses07 May 2009
22:16 GMT
Most RecentSeriously...Incentives? Posted by PLOSBiology on 07 May 2009 at 22:16 GMT -
0 Responses07 May 2009
22:16 GMT
Most RecentGreat idea Posted by PLOSBiology on 07 May 2009 at 22:16 GMT