Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Apical spectrin organizes cortical actin filament bundles to pattern C. elegans cuticle ridges

  • Prioty Ferheen Sarwar ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Prioty Ferheen Sarwar, Trevor James Barker

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Trevor James Barker ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Prioty Ferheen Sarwar, Trevor James Barker

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Ken Nguyen,

    Roles Investigation

    Affiliations Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, United States of America, Department of Biology, Queens College CUNY, Flushing, New York, United States of America

  • Fung-Yi Chan,

    Roles Investigation

    Affiliations i3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal, IBMC-Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

  • David H. Hall,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, United States of America

  • Ana Xavier Carvalho,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations i3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal, IBMC-Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal, Biology Department, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

  • Meera Vedavalli Sundaram

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    sundaram@pennmedicine.upenn.edu

    Affiliation Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America

Abstract

The apical extracellular matrix can form elaborate three-dimensional structures on animal surfaces. To better understand the mechanisms that pattern and shape these structures, we focus on development of collagen-rich cuticle ridges (alae) in adult C. elegans. Previous studies suggested that longitudinal actin filament bundles (AFBs) in the lateral seam epidermis specify alae position through a mechanism that involves post-secretory matrix delamination. Here we identify additional components of this highly organized cortical actin network and show that loss of the apical βH-spectrin SMA-1 specifically disrupts organization of the two AFBs that would normally flank the site where the middle alae ridge forms. Correspondingly, sma-1 loss, or mutation of its actin binding domains, also disrupts formation of the middle alae ridge. Ultrastructurally, sma-1 mutants have expanded regions of matrix delamination that can explain middle ridge loss. Together, these data highlight the importance of apical spectrin for organizing a patterned actin network within epithelia and show that, via its effects on actin organization, spectrin can also change the extracellular matrix and its patterns on animal surfaces.

Author summary

The external surfaces of many organisms are decorated with regularly spaced protruding structures such as hairs, bristles, scales, and ridges. These structures play important roles in sensory functions, social interactions, and many other aspects of animal biology, but how can they be so precisely generated and shaped in the extracellular environment? This manuscript studies how long “racing stripe”-like cuticle ridges called ‘alae’ are patterned in the nematode C. elegans. We show how the linear arrangement of actin fibers within the long narrow lateral skin cells helps to organize linear patterns in the developing apical extracellular matrix above them, and we identify the actin binding protein β-H spectrin as a crucial regulator of actin and matrix organization. The data show how genetic changes in a specific actin binding protein can lead to specific changes in actin organization and consequently to specific changes in matrix patterns.

Introduction

Animal surfaces are often decorated with three-dimensional apical extracellular matrix (aECM) structures such as pores, scales, denticles, or ridges [13]. Such aECM structures have characteristic spacing and morphology, and an important question is how they can be patterned and shaped within the extracellular environment [4].

Actin-dependent cues from the underlying epithelium can provide important spatial cues to initiate aECM patterning, but the mechanisms by which such cues are relayed to the matrix appear to vary. In some cases, actin filament bundles (AFBs) pattern aECM structures by altering the shape of underlying cells; for example, Drosophila denticle belts form when aECM is deposited on top of actomyosin-driven cellular protrusions that later recede, leaving the matrix behind [5,6]. Ridges in butterfly wing scales are also thought to form by actomyosin-driven membrane buckling [7]. In other cases, AFBs may determine sites of matrix secretion; for example, in budding yeast and Drosophila, actin rings or filaments position membrane-associated chitin synthase to pattern chitin-rich structures immediately above them [811]. In the case of the collagenous cuticle alae ridges of C. elegans, a third mechanism has been invoked that does not involve stable plasma membrane deformation or any apparent localized matrix secretion. Instead, ridges form in the intervals between parallel AFBs through a still poorly understood mechanism involving actomyosin-dependent matrix delamination [12].

C. elegans alae are longitudinal cuticle matrix ridges present over the lateral epidermis or “seam cells” of adults and other specific developmental stages (Fig 1A) [1]. The three adult alae ridges form de novo as the new adult cuticle develops underneath the older non-ridged L4 larval cuticle (Fig 1B). Although the mature alae are primarily collagenous in structure, proper formation of alae requires a different transient matrix, called the precuticle, present at their earliest stages of development [1,13]. Prior work showed that precuticle proteins, including the lipocalin LPR-3 and the Zona Pellucida (ZP) domain proteins LET-653 and NOAH-1, initially are secreted broadly over the apical surface of the seam syncytium, below the existing larval cuticle [12]. Subsequently, these precuticle proteins become patterned into bands corresponding to developing alae ridges or their intervening valleys (Fig 1B,1C), and they then help to organize the permanent matrix components that make up the mature adult alae.

thumbnail
Fig 1. SMA-1/βH-spectrin associates with seam AFBs during alae patterning.

(A) Lateral schematic of the adult precuticle (magenta) developing under the L4 cuticle (green). Black box indicates region shown at higher magnification in schematic at right and imaged in C-E. (B) Transverse schematics of the L4 seam syncytium, summarizing localization patterns of precuticle and cytoskeletal proteins during alae development. Alae form above the lateral seam syncytium, which sits within the larger hyp7 epidermal syncytium, and between regions of delamination within pre-cuticle layers (magenta, purple, lavender) [12]. Some pre-cuticle proteins, like LPR-3, accumulate in the developing alae. Others accumulate in the enlarging delaminations or valleys. (C-E) Super-resolution airyscan images of the apical seam at early (L4.3-L4.4, left) and late (L4.6-L4.7, right) mid-L4 substages, corresponding to before and after pre-cuticle alae patterning. The seam widens during alae patterning and the two medial AFBs become resolved [12]. (C) mCh::LPR-3 and seam AFBs (visualized using seam-expressed UTRNCH::GFP). Image at right is a Z-projection of six confocal slices; (D) SPC-1::GFP; (E) SMA-1::GFP and UTRNCH::DsRed. Boxed regions are shown at higher magnification in (E’). All images representative of at least n = 10 specimens imaged.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012236.g001

The post-secretory patterning of the alae precuticle depends on the underlying actomyosin cytoskeleton [12]. Shortly after seam cell fusion to form left and right syncytia, and before precuticle patterning, four longitudinal AFBs form at the seam apical cortex and predict the sites of future alae valleys (Fig 1B and 1C). Two of these seam AFBs are present at the junctions between the seam syncytium and the surrounding hyp7 epidermal syncytium, which has its own corresponding AFBs (Fig 1B). The two remaining seam AFBs are present in the medial region of the seam, flanking the region where the middle alae ridge will form (Fig 1B and 1C). RNAi knockdown of actin or non-muscle myosin (NM II) disrupted seam cell shape and precuticle patterning and ultimately led to disruptions in the mature alae. Ultrastructural data revealed that alae formation initiates as small horizonal slits or delaminations between layers of the precuticle aECM, without any accompanying stable deformation of the underlying seam plasma membrane (Fig 1B). Like the seam AFBs, these matrix delaminations presaged where the valleys between alae ridges would form, while intervening regions of remaining matrix adhesion corresponded to the future alae ridges. These data suggested that longitudinal AFBs somehow relay information to the overlying matrix to trigger local delamination and the displacement of different matrix factors towards future ridge or valley regions. However, the very pleiotropic phenotypes seen after actin or NM II knockdown made it difficult to link specific changes in the cytoskeleton to changes in matrix structure.

Spectrins are a major component of the cortical membrane cytoskeleton, where they can help organize actin networks and link cortical actin to plasma membranes and specific transmembrane proteins [14]. Spectrins are also mechanosensitive and can help transduce internal cytoskeletal forces and/or external shear forces across the plasma membrane [1517]. Therefore, they are excellent candidates for organizing the seam cytoskeletal network and/or relaying cytoskeletal cues to the apical membrane and developing matrix. Here we show that beta-heavy (βH) spectrin, along with the cytoskeletal cross-linker VAB-10/spectraplakin and intermediate filaments, are part of a highly organized but transient cytoskeletal network that assembles within the seam epidermis during the period of alae formation. SMA-1 is specifically required to organize the two medial-most AFBs within the seam and to pattern precuticle aECM factors to form the middle alae ridge. Ultrastructural data show expanded regions of matrix delamination in sma-1 mutants at the earliest stages of alae patterning, demonstrating that SMA-1 and AFBs are required to focus delamination to specific regions. Finally, a LIM domain reporter suggests increased actin stress at remaining junctional AFBs, suggesting that altered seam mechanical properties may explain the altered balance between matrix delamination and ridge adhesion and growth.

Results

SMA-1/βH-spectrin and VAB-10/spectraplakin are part of a highly organized but transient cortical cytoskeletal network within the seam epidermis

To identify molecular players that pattern alae development, we first screened endogenous fluorescent fusions to known actin-binding proteins and other cytoskeletal factors, looking for AFB-related localization patterns (S1 Table). This screen identified SMA-1/βH-spectrin and VAB-10/spectraplakin, amongst others, as part of the apical cytoskeletal network within the seam epidermis (Figs 1 and 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. VAB-10/spectraplakin and IFB-1 localize between seam medial AFBs.

(A-D) Super-resolution airyscan images of the apical seam at the L4.5-L4.7 substages. (A, A’, C) VAB-10a::mCh and (B,B’) VAB-10b::GFP form a row of puncta between the two medial seam AFBs. VAB-10a prominently marks CeHDs, as previously described [22], but VAB-10b was not detected at CeHDs at this stage. VAB-10a is also present in faint circumferential bands of puncta in the lateral portion of hyp7, similar to SMA-1 (S1 Fig) and actin [12]. (D) VAB-10a::mCh and IFB-1b::GFP puncta are found interspersed together at the medial seam. (E) Orthogonal (transverse) views of the animals in A and B. VAB-10a appears slightly apical to AFBs while VAB-10b appears slightly basal. (F) Transverse schematic of the L4 seam syncytium. VAB-10 and IFB-1b are found below the developing middle alae ridge. All images representative of at least n = 10 specimens imaged.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012236.g002

Spectrins usually form heterotetramers with two alpha and two beta subunits [14]. C. elegans has one alpha spectrin (SPC-1), one beta heavy chain spectrin (SMA-1), and one canonical beta spectrin (UNC-70) (see Fig 3A). Consistent with prior studies in other tissues [1820], we observed SMA-1::GFP apically within the seam, whereas UNC-70::GFP was basolateral; SPC-1::GFP was present in both domains, consistent with SPC-1 functioning with both beta subunits (Figs 1D and 1E and S1 Fig and S1 -S3 Movies). The known spectrin binding protein, UNC-44/ankyrin, resembled UNC-70 in its basolateral localization (S1 Fig and S4 Movie). Both the SMA-1 and SPC-1 apical patterns resembled the actin pattern, with three longitudinal bands in the L4.3-L4.4 substages (“early mid-L4”, when the seam is at its narrowest) that resolved to four bands in the L4.5-L4.7 substages (“late mid-L4”, when the seam widens and developing alae first appear) (Fig 1D and 1E). SMA-1 and actin co-labelling showed that they are closely associated, though not precisely colocalized (Fig 1E). Similar to actin, the SMA-1/βH-spectrin and SPC-1/α-spectrin bands were present only transiently during the mid-L4 stages (L4.3-L4.7, Fig 1D and 1E) and began to disperse before the molt (S1 Fig), eventually disappearing in adults. Thus, these cytoskeletal structures correlate well with the time when alae ridges are being patterned and built.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Apical spectrin mutants have defects in the middle alae ridge.

(A) Protein schematics highlighting functional domains of the C. elegans spectrin and spectraplakin proteins and mutant lesions. The specific isoforms drawn are indicated. In subsequent figure panels and text, sma-1(-) indicates ru18, spc-1(rf) indicates cas971, and unc-70(rf) indicates cas983. (B) Transverse schematic of the seam and alae in wild-type (WT) adults. (C) Archival TEM images of sma-1(e30) adults (a kind gift from M. Buechner). Transverse sections from different body regions show some areas with normal alae (left) and other areas with an under-developed (middle) or absent (right) middle ridge (indicated with red arrows). (D) Representative images of the young adult alae of indicated strains, as viewed by Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) microscopy. Brackets encompass the alae region. Solid lines at left indicate intact alae ridges while dashed lines indicate disrupted alae. Colored lines on the left correspond to how the image was categorized in (F). (E) Young adult alae viewed by epifluorescence after staining with the lipophilic dye DiI. Arrows point to prominent middle alae breaks. Red asterisks indicate when all three alae ridges show noticeable defects. (F) Phenotypic penetrance and expressivity of alae defects in single or double mutants. The vab-10a(e698) and spc-1(cas971) missense alleles showed a strong genetic interaction. *** p < 0.0001, Fisher’s Exact Test (normal vs. abnormal) when compared to WT and ** p < 0.001 (severe vs. other) when compared to spc-1 single mutant. ns, not significant.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012236.g003

VAB-10/spectraplakin is a cytoskeletal linker thought to connect actin to intermediate filaments (IFs) and microtubules (MTs) [21]. It has been studied mainly for its role in C. elegans hemidesmosomes (CeHDs), which span narrow regions of the hyp7 epidermis to link the cuticle to underlying body muscle [22]. Using endogenous fusions (S1 Table), we also observed VAB-10 in other regions of hyp7 and in the seam (Fig 2A and S5 Movie). Within the seam, the two major splice isoforms VAB-10a (IF binding) and VAB-10b (MT binding) each formed a prominent row of medial puncta running between the two medial AFBs and SMA-1/βH-spectrin (Fig 2A-2C). As previously reported in embryonic CeHDs [22,23], VAB-10a appeared closely associated with the intermediate filament IFB-1b (Fig 2D) and it localized slightly more apically than VAB-10b when compared to AFBs (Fig 2E and 2F). Thus, VAB-10 and IFs run beneath the region where the middle alae ridge will form.

Several other CeHD components (VAB-19, LET-805) were not detected in the medial region of the mid-L4 seam (S1 Table), suggesting the lack of a canonical CeHD structure at this site and consistent with the absence of muscle under most of the seam epidermis. The apical CeHD component MUP-4 (a matrillin-related transmembrane protein [24]) was found near VAB-10 in a single band in the midbody, but it appeared at a later stage than VAB-10 and, unlike VAB-10, it did not extend beyond the midbody (S2 Fig). Furthermore, MUP-4 appeared more basal than VAB-10a, suggesting it might be present at hyp7 and/or vulva cell membranes below the seam, near where CeHDs will later form above vulva muscle attachments (S2 Fig). We conclude that, at least outside the midbody, the seam apical VAB-10 structure does not correspond to a classical CeHD but instead represents a distinct cortical arrangement of VAB-10 and IFs.

sma-1/βH-spectrin mutants have defects in the middle alae ridge

To test for functional roles of apical spectrin, we examined mutants for two different sma-1 alleles, including the deletion/frameshift and protein null ru18 and the nonsense allele e30 (Fig 3A), both of which are viable [18]. In wild-type (WT) young adults, the three alae ridges each have a roughly rectangular shape when viewed in transverse sections by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Fig 3B and 3C). Alae can also be visualized as longitudinal bands using differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy or by staining with the lipophilic dye DiI (Fig 3D and 3E). All three methods of visualization showed that sma-1 alleles caused defects specifically in the middle alae ridge, which appeared missing or under-developed in some regions, while the two outer alae ridges appeared largely normal (Fig 3C-3E).

Using DIC imaging, we categorized mutant severity based on whether the middle ridge was consistently disrupted across the mid-body (“disorganized”) or only occasionally disrupted with long intervening stretches of normality (“partially disorganized”) (see Methods). Rarely, both middle and outer ridges were disrupted (“severe”). Surprisingly, the two sma-1 alleles showed differing severity and penetrance, with ru18 being less severe than e30 (Fig 3D-3F). It is possible that sma-1(e30) produces some truncated protein, causing a greater steric disruption to the spectrin network. However, we can’t exclude the possibility of a linked modifier. All further experiments were done with the null allele sma-1(ru18) (hereafter sma-1(-)).

spc-1 and unc-70 null mutants are early larval lethal [19], so we examined only partial reduction of function (rf) mutants (Fig 3D-3F) [25]. spc-1(cas971rf) caused middle alae defects similar to, but slightly less severe than, those caused by loss of sma-1, while most unc-70(cas983rf) mutants appeared normal (Fig 3D-3F). We conclude that the apical spectrin network (SMA-1 + SPC-1) is important for patterning the middle alae ridge.

A vab-10a/spectraplakin mutant genetically interacts with spc-1/α-spectrin

vab-10 null mutants are embryonic lethal [22], so to test for functional roles of spectraplakin we examined RNAi-treated animals and multiple partial reduction of function mutants; however, none showed any alae defects (S2 Table). Ifb-1b mutants were also mostly normal (S2 Table). We then asked if vab-10 showed any genetic interactions with spectrins. The vab-10a-specific missense allele e698 (Fig 3A) did not enhance the defects of sma-1(ru18) mutants, but it did strongly enhance spc-1(cas971rf), causing severe defects across all three alae ridges (Fig 3D-3F). We conclude that VAB-10 cooperates with spectrins to pattern all three alae ridges, and therefore, like actin, VAB-10 and α-spectrin play broader roles than SMA-1. However, since VAB-10 appears to play an accessory role, or one that is masked by its pleiotropy, we focused further studies on SMA-1/βH-spectrin.

SMA-1/βH-spectrin functions within the seam syncytium to affect alae patterning

Since both the seam epidermis and hyp7 have been implicated in alae patterning [12], and SMA-1 is expressed in both tissues (S1 Fig) [26], we used tissue-specific RNAi to test if sma-1 acts in the seam to affect alae patterning (Fig 4). These experiments used an RNAi-deficient rde-1 mutant strain with transgenic rescue of rde-1 under the seam-specific promoter elt-5pro [12]. As a control, we also included a strain with transgenic rescue of rde-1 under the Pnp specific promoter lin-31pro [27], since both Pnp-derived cells and seam-derived cells ultimately fuse with hyp7 [28] and might therefore confer some RNAi sensitivity there. Seam-specific RNAi knockdown of sma-1 caused alae defects similar to those seen in whole-animal RNAi positive controls, while Pnp-specific RNAi knockdown showed very few defects, similar to rde-1 negative controls (Fig 4A and 4B). We conclude that sma-1 functions within the seam syncytium to pattern the middle alae ridge.

thumbnail
Fig 4. sma-1 acts within the seam to pattern the middle alae ridge.

(A) Representative DIC micrographs of the adult alae after sma-1 RNAi treatment in: i) WT (N2) ii) rde-1 (RNAi deficient) iii) rde-1; elt5pro::rde-1 (seam specific RNAi) and iv) rde-1; lin-31pro::rde-1 (hyp7 + vulva specific RNAi). Colored lines on the left correspond to how the image was categorized in (B). Arrows are pointing to significant breaks in the alae. (B) Quantification of alae defects in sma-1 RNAi treatment condition versus empty vector (EV) control. ***p < 0.0001, ns (not significant) using Fisher’s Exact Test (normal vs. abnormal) when compared to EV.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012236.g004

SMA-1 actin binding domains (ABDs) are important for normal alae patterning

To better understand the mechanism by which SMA-1 acts, we took advantage of available domain-specific sma-1 mutants [29] (Fig 5A). Deletions removing the SMA-1 pleckstrin homology (PH) or SH3 domains did not cause any alae defects (Fig 5B and 5C), suggesting that PH-mediated interactions with the plasma membrane and SH3-mediated signaling are not critical to SMA-1 patterning of alae. A deletion removing 11 of the 29 spectrin repeats caused some defects, but these were relatively modest (Fig 5B and 5C), suggesting a limited role for these repeats. On the other hand, two deletions removing parts of the actin binding calponin-homology (CH) domains caused middle ridge defects as severe as those in sma-1(e30) mutants and more severe than those seen in sma-1(rh18) null mutants (Fig 5B and 5C; compare to Fig 3F). Importantly, these latter alleles both reduce SMA-1 protein levels to varying degrees but do not eliminate expression, as assessed by Western blot, with ΔABD2 retaining more expression than ΔABD1 [29]. Nevertheless, the phenotypes of these two alleles were indistinguishable (Fig 5C). These results suggest that actin binding is critical for SMA-1-dependent alae patterning.

thumbnail
Fig 5. The SMA-1 actin binding domain (ABD) is required to pattern the middle alae ridge.

(A) SMA-1 protein schematic highlighting functional domains and domain-specific deletions. (B) Representative DIC images of the alae phenotype in five sma-1 domain mutants. Colored lines on the left correspond to how the image was categorized in (C). Black arrows indicate prominent alae breaks. Brackets encompass the alae region. Solid line indicates an overall linear alae appearance while dashed lines indicate disrupted alae. (C) Quantification of alae defects. *p < 0.01, ***p < 0.0001, ns (not significant) using Fisher’s Exact Test (normal vs. abnormal) when compared to WT.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012236.g005

sma-1 loss specifically disrupts organization of the medial seam AFBs

To ask at what step SMA-1 acts to pattern alae, we examined molecular markers for the precuticle, apical junctions, and the cytoskeleton. Consistent with their observed alae phenotype (Fig 3), sma-1(-) mutants showed mis-patterning of the pre-cuticle matrix factor LPR-3, specifically disrupting the developing middle alae ridge (Fig 6A). Therefore, sma-1 acts at a step before pre-cuticle patterning. VAB-10a medial puncta were still present, though slightly more disorganized, indicating that SMA-1 is at least partly dispensable for VAB-10 recruitment (Fig 6B). Furthermore, unlike what we previously reported for actin or NM II knockdown [12], sma-1 loss did not disrupt apical junctions or the continuity of the seam and had only minor if any effects on overall seam shape at the mid-L4 stage (Figs 6C and 6D and S3). SPC-1 still localized to the hyp7-seam border, likely due to its interactions with UNC-70/β-spectrin, but sma-1(-) mutants completely lacked apical SPC-1 at the medial seam (Fig 6C). Finally, sma-1(-) mutants still had normal junctional AFBs and NMY-2/NM II, but medial AFBs were much reduced, with apical actin still present in some longitudinal structures but appearing much fainter and less coherent (Fig 6D-6F). Together with the requirement for the SMA-1 actin binding domains (Fig 5), these data indicate that SMA-1/βH-spectrin promotes proper medial AFB organization and/or stability to pattern the pre-cuticle at the middle alae ridge.

thumbnail
Fig 6. sma-1 mutants have reduced medial AFBs.

(A-E) Comparison of fluorescently tagged protein localization in a WT versus sma-1(-) background. All images are Airyscan processed, shown in inverted greyscale, and are representative of at least n = 10 specimens imaged. Red asterisks indicate abnormalities. (A) SfGFP::LPR-3 precuticle marker reveals fragmentation of the developing alae ridge in sma-1(-) mutants. (B) VAB-10a::GFP puncta still mark the medial seam. (C) SPC-1::GFP is lost from the apical region in sma-1(-) mutants. (D) NMY-2::GFP is mainly detected at junctional AFBs in both WT and sma-1(-) mutants. The signal at medial AFBs is too low for reliable assessment. (E) Seam AFBs visualized by elt-5pro::UTRNCH::GFP are reduced and less coherent in the medial region of sma-1(-) mutants, while junctional AFBs remain intact. (F) Quantifications of UTRNCH::GFP intensity from (E). Each dot represents the average intensity from three measured regions, spaced 5 µm and 10 um apart, within a single animal. **p < 0.001, Mann Whitney U test. ns, not significant. (G) Confocal images of SMA-1::GFP localization in empty vector (EV) control versus act-2 RNAi background shows irregular and tortuous patterning at both the hyp7-seam junctions and middle of the seam. (H) Quantification of the medial apical SMA-1::GFP signal from (G). Despite the effect on patterning, no significant difference (ns) in the amount of fluorescent signal was found by Mann-Whitney U test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012236.g006

As expected, act-2/actin RNAi greatly disrupted SMA-1 patterning at both the junctional and medial regions, though substantial amounts of SMA-1 remained near the apical cortex, likely due to residual actin (Fig 6G and 6H). Therefore, SMA-1 and actin are mutually dependent for setting up or stabiilizing the organized medial bands that ultimately pattern the middle alae ridge.

Ultrastructure reveals expanded regions of matrix delamination in sma-1 mutants

We predicted that the reduction in medial AFBs might reduce matrix delamination in sma-1(-) mutants. On the contrary, transmission electron microscopy showed enlarged regions of delamination (Fig 7A-7D). While medial delaminations were on average <200 nm wide in wild type, they were >300 nm wide in sma-1(-) mutants (Fig 7D). In some cases, the two medial delaminations were very close together or merged into one, without an intervening region of matrix adhesion, explaining loss of the middle alae ridge (Fig 7B and 7C). In older L4 specimens, we also observed cases where three alae ridges had begun to form, but the middle ridge was underdeveloped and appeared to have prematurely lost adhesion to the old (L4) cuticle (Fig 7E). This latter phenotype corresponds well to the underdeveloped middle ridge also observed in TEM of sma-1(e30) adults (Fig 1C). At all stages, the seam apical membrane remained flat in sma-1 mutants. Apical vesicles were frequently observed, but these did not correlate with slit position and there was no apparent difference in their abundance between genotypes. These results indicate that SMA-1 and medial AFBs are not required for matrix delamination per se, but rather influence the spatial distribution of delamination vs. adhesion and subsequent ridge growth.

thumbnail
Fig 7. sma-1 mutants have expanded regions of matrix delamination.

(A-C) TEM micrographs of transversely-sectioned mid-L4 larvae. Seam cell is false-colored in blue. White arrows indicate matrix delaminations or slits, and black arrows indicate regions of remaining matrix adhesion. Red arrow and asterisk indicate regions where adhesion has been nearly or fully lost, respectively. Scale bars: 500 nm. (A) wild-type (N2 1455-F). (B,C) sma-1(ru18). In B, the top image (AZ30-1B) appears similar to WT, while the bottom image (AZ30-6) shows expanded slits. The animal in C (AZ30-7) is slightly older and its outer alae ridges have begun to form and contain electron dense material at their tips (black arrows); however no middle ridge or density is present. (D) Quantification of slit length in mid-L4 larvae. Each dot represents a single slit measurement (with 4 measurements per image) and colors indicate the different specimens (n = 3 WT and n = 4 sma-1(ru18)). Where possible, measurements were made of slits on both the left and right sides of two separate body regions. Light gray, N2 1455-F; dark gray, N2 1455-B; black, N2 1455-H; maroon, AZ30-1A; light brown, AZ30-1B; gold, AZ30-5; magenta, AZ30-6B). Note that the sma-1 specimen in C was excluded from this analysis because of its slightly older age, but it shows a similar trend. *p < 0.01, ***p < 0.0001, Mann Whitney U test. (E) Two regions of the same sma-1(ru18) late L4 larva (AZ30-3). At the top, all three alae ridges have formed normally (black arrows), while at the bottom the middle ridge is smaller and lacks electron dense material at its tip (red arrow).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012236.g007

sma-1 mutants have altered seam mechanics as assessed with a TES-1 LIM domain fusion

Since sma-1 mutants have reduced medial AFBs, we hypothesized that the seam cortical network would experience altered forces. To test this, we took advantage of the well-characterized ability of many LIM domains to specifically bind stressed actin [3033]. C. elegans TES-1/testin is a LIM domain protein expressed in the seam but not the surrounding hypodermis [33]. In vertebrate cells, full-length testin appears cytoplamic while the isolated N-terminal region (containing the PET domain) associates with un-stressed actin and the isolated LIM domains associate with stressed actin [30]. Consistent with similar behavior of C. elegans TES-1 domains (Fig 8A), full-length mNG::TES-1 appeared cytoplasmic within the mid-L4 seam (Fig 8B), while mNG::TES-1(ΔLIM) (Fig 8C) and mNG::TES-1(ΔPET) (Fig 8D) each showed patterns resembling seam AFBs. We focused on the latter fusion as a putative mechanosensitive reporter. Strikingly, in sma-1(-) mutants, mNG::TES-1(ΔPET) accumulated more highly near junctional AFBs and had a patchy appearance (Fig 8D and 8E,E’). Nevertheless, we did not see a corresponding increase in NMY-2::GFP, which was faint along junctional AFBs and nearly undetectable at medial AFBs in both WT and sma-1(-) animals (Fig 6D). Junctional actin levels (Fig 6E,6F) and cadherin junction appearance (S3 Fig) also were similar between WT and sma-1(-) animals, so the increase in TES-1(ΔPET) signal suggests an increase in actin stress at the seam-hyp7 border. Although we can’t exclude the possibility that TES-1(ΔPET) is responding to some other change in sma-1(-) mutants, these experiments suggest that medial AFBs help distribute forces within the seam syncytium and that sma-1 mutants have altered force distributions that could contribute to the altered patterns of matrix delamination and alae ridge growth.

thumbnail
Fig 8. sma-1 mutants have altered seam mechanical stress as assessed with a TES-1 LIM domain reporter.

(A) Schematic of mNeonGreen (mNG) tagged TES-1 and other endogenous fusions containing deletions of specific domains [33]. (B-D) Representative single confocal slices of (B) mNG::TES-1, (C) mNG::TES-1(ΔLIM1-3), and (D) mNG::TES-1ΔPET at mid-L4 (L4.3-L4.5), shown in inverted greyscale. In sma-1(-) mutants, mNG::TES-1ΔPET signal was consistently elevated in a patchy pattern along the length of the seam. (E, E’) Quantification of mNG::TES-1ΔPET intensity at the seam-hyp7 junctions. In (E) each datapoint is the average peak intensity of all the animals at each stage. In (E’) each dot represents the average from all measurements within a single animal. **p < 0.001, ***p < 0.0001, Mann Whitney U test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012236.g008

Discussion

Spectrins organize and stabilize diverse cortical actin arrangements to shape and protect plasma membrane domains in red blood cells, neurons, and epithelia [14,17]. Here we showed that apical SMA-1/βH-spectrin helps organize two specific AFBs within a set of four parallel AFBs present in the C. elegans L4 seam epidermis. In sma-1 mutants, reduced and less coherent medial AFBs lead to altered seam mechanics, expanded regions of matrix delamination, reduced matrix adhesion, and partial or complete loss of the middle alae ridge (Fig 9A). Thus, through its effects on the actin cytoskeleton, spectrin can also profoundly change the extracellular matrix and its patterns on animal surfaces.

thumbnail
Fig 9. Models for SMA-1- and AFB-dependent patterning of alae ridges.

(A) Results summary. Loss of sma-1 reduces medial AFBs and leads to regions of middle ridge loss, while some medial VAB-10 remains. Note that, for simplicity, VAB-10 is not depicted in subsequent panels. (B,C) Models based on presumed connection of AFBs to the apical plasma membrane via unknown linker(s) (yellow) that are distinct from SMA-1. (B) Model 1: AFBs concentrate matrix nucleation factors or “landing pads” (blue) in the regions between them, for example by focusing their initial secretion and/or by establishing “picket fences” that restrict their lateral diffusion; these factors are reduced or less focused in sma-1(-) mutants. (C) Model 2: AFBs focus mechanical tension, which becomes broader due to AFB disorganization in sma-1 (-) mutants. See text for further details.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012236.g009

SMA-1/βH-dependent organization of the seam cortical cytoskeleton

C. elegans alae form above the lateral seam cells, which are narrow strips of syncytial epidermis that are less than five microns wide but close to a millimeter long. Seam syncytia sit nestled on top of the larger hyp7 syncytium, which surrounds them on three sides and to which they are mechanically coupled through adherens junctions (Fig 1A and 1B). The seam’s elongated topology is quite different from that of most other epithelial cell types in which apical spectrin function has been studied. Seam syncytia also have an unusual cytoskeletal architecture, with four parallel longitudinal AFBs that are closely associated with SMA-1/βH-spectrin and a single central band of intermediate filaments and VAB-10/spectraplakin.

Within this unusual seam cytoskeleton, only the two medial AFBs require SMA-1 for their coherence. These medial AFBs lack the stabilizing influence of adherens junctions and of the basolateral spectrin network (UNC-70 + SPC-1) and therefore appear particularly reliant on interactions with the apical spectrin network (SMA-1 + SPC-1). Loss of sma-1 reduces medial AFBs and specifically affects just the middle alae ridge, supporting local patterning of that ridge by the AFBs that immediately flank it. The observed expansion of the matrix delamination zone in these mutants indicates that SMA-1 and robust medial AFBs are not required for delamination, but rather focus such delamination to the proper regions (Fig 9A).

We originally hypothesized that SMA-1 might link medial AFBs to the apical membrane and thereby directly relay tension for delamination, but our results suggest this may not be a critical aspect of SMA-1 function. Structure/function studies showed that the SMA-1 membrane-binding PH domain is dispensable for its function in alae patterning, as are the SH3 domain and many of the spectrin repeats; only mutations that remove the actin binding domain have a strong effect on alae. Furthermore, medial regions of delamination are not only present in sma-1 null mutants, but they are actually enlarged, indicating that SMA-1 restrains rather than promotes delamination. sma-1 mutants also show increased TES-1 LIM domain recruitment to junctional AFBs, suggesting that through its effects on actin, SMA-1 does influence seam mechanics even if it does not play a direct role in AFB-membrane attachment.

Seam medial AFBs are reduced but not entirely absent in sma-1 mutants, and the medial VAB-10 network is still at least partially intact (Fig 9A), suggesting some spatial information still remains, which may explain why a partial middle alae ridge is still present. Among the other factors contributing to seam cytoskeletal organization could be the ezrin/radixin/moesin homolog ERM-1 [34], another membrane-actin linker that our initial screen identified as having AFB-like localization patterns (S1 Table). Further studies will be needed to understand the roles of ERM-1 and other actin-binding proteins present within the seam and their relationships to SMA-1.

The role of VAB-10/spectraplakin in alae patterning

VAB-10/spectraplakin is another actin binding protein that influences alae development but whose role remains to be clarified. VAB-10 and its known partner IFB-1b have an intriguing localization pattern in the inter-AFB region below the central alae ridge, yet it’s not clear what role, if any, this pool of VAB-10 plays in alae patterning. This work shows that VAB-10a does not absolutely depend on SMA-1 for its medial recruitment, nor does it appear to act redundantly with SMA-1 to pattern the middle ridge, although seam-specific knockouts will be needed to fully address its role. Instead, the fact that vab-10a(rf); spc-1(rf) double mutants have defects in all three ridges suggests that both play larger, SMA-1-independent roles in actin organization or other processes. VAB-10 may be acting not only in the seam but also or instead in hyp7, which is mechanically coupled to the seam and has both longitudinal and circumferentially-arranged actin, spectrin, and VAB-10 structures. The contributions of the hyp7 cytoskeleton to alae patterning, already suggested in [12], will be important to dissect in future studies.

How is seam AFB information relayed to the aECM to pattern alae?

While our prior study suggested that seam AFBs pattern alae spacing and orientation [12], the extreme pleiotropy associated with knocking down actin or NM II made it challenging to directly link specific cytoskeletal changes to their matrix consequences. The specific consequences of removing SMA-1/βH-spectrin now reveal that the middle alae ridge is patterned independently from the outer ridges, by the flanking actomyosin structures below it. Furthermore, SMA-1-dependent medial AFBs restrain rather than promote delamination.

The mechanism by which AFBs influence delamination and other matrix properties remains an open question. The cortical cytoskeleton can influence multiple properties of overlying plasma membranes beyond their simple shape. For example, actin-membrane linkers such as spectrins have been proposed to establish “picket fences” that restrict the lateral mobility of membrane lipids and proteins to compartmentalize vesicle trafficking and signaling [3537]. One possible related model is that seam AFBs may restrict the lateral movements of transmembrane proteins that nucleate alae ridge growth and/or constrain secretion of such nucleators to the regions between them (Fig 9B, Model 1). In this model, matrix nucleators would be the equivalent of molecular “landing pads” proposed to bind and recruit broadly secreted matrix proteins for cell-type specific matrix assembly [4], but in this case they would recruit those proteins to specific sub-cellular regions above the seam syncytium. Note that we do not propose that SMA-1 itself serves as the key actin-membrane linker for this model, but rather that reduced medial AFBs in sma-1(-) mutants could lead to less focused matrix nucleation and therefore less efficient adhesion and broader delamination (Fig 9B).

We previously proposed an alternative (though not mutually exclusive) model that AFB information could be transmitted mechanically to the matrix via actin-membrane linkers and transmembrane matrix factors [12] (Fig 9C, Model 2). Both in vitro studies and in silico modeling have shown that mechanical forces can pattern and deform fibrous collagen matrices over distances greater than several cell diameters [3841]. When combined with the known tendencies of layered biomaterials to delaminate and wrinkle under mismatched strains and adhesiveness [42], AFB-dependent cues could lead to reproducible patterns of delamination vs. adhesion and subsequent matrix buckling to form ridge-like structures. While our new results indicate that medial AFBs are not required for delamination, they do suggest that medial AFBs help to distribute forces within the tissue. In sma-1 mutants, altered force distributions may lead to altered strain on the matrix that favors delamination over adhesion.

Distinguishing between these (and other) models will require more direct measurements of seam mechanical properties and the identification of additional molecular players, such as transmembrane “landing pads” in the case of Model 1, or other proteins that link AFBs to the membrane and/or the membrane to the matrix in the case of Model 2. Identifying such factors is a major goal of ongoing work.

Actin binding proteins and the evolution of invertebrate surface structures

Invertebrates exhibit a wide variety of cuticle substructures that are thought to confer advantages in different ecological niches. For example, adults of different nematode species have different numbers or shapes of alae ridges or can lack alae entirely [43,44]. The functional consequences of alae differences are still a mystery, but the specific sma-1 mutant phenotype described here echoes classic studies on actin in Drosophila bristle cells [45,46] and reveals how changes in a single actin binding protein can lead to specific changes in cuticle patterning. We predict that such changes over the course of nematode evolution could explain many of the observed species-specific morphologies.

Materials and methods

Strains and worm maintenance

C. elegans strains used in this study are listed in S1 Table (fusions screened) and S3 Table (strains studied further). Fusion proteins were expressed from their endogenous loci, except for actin which was visualized using seam-specific transgenic reporters expressing the utrophin CH domain (UTRNCH) fused to GFP or dsRed [12]. Information from Wormbase was used in the design of all experiments [47]. Strains were maintained under standard conditions at 20˚ C on nematode growth medium (NGM) plates seeded with E. coli OP50–1 [48].

Light microscopy

Epifluorescent and differential interference contrast (DIC) images were collected with a Zeiss Axioskop (Carl Zeiss Microscopy). Confocal images were collected with a Leica Dmi8 microscope, HC PL APO 63x (Numerical Aperture 1.3), and Las X software. Super-resolution (Airyscan) images were collected with a Zeiss LSM 880 microscope, Airyscan Plan-Apochromat 63x/1 or Plan/LD C-Apochromat 40x/1.3/1.1 objective, and Zen Black software. In all cases, 400 Hz scanning speed, 1X line accumulation, 4X line average, and a pinhole setting of 1 AU were used. For confocal, Z stacks were collected with 0.33 μm slices and for Airyscan Z-stacks were collected in a range of 0.19-0.33 μm slices. SfGFP fusions were excited via a 488 nm laser and emissions between 493 and 547 nm were detected using a HyD sensor. mCherry fusion proteins were excited by a 552 nm laser and emissions between 583 and 784 nm were detected by a HyD sensor. Laser power (0.5-4%) and gain settings (60–90%) were determined based on fusion protein. Unless otherwise indicated, all confocal and Airyscan images shown are single Z-slices.

Live worms were immobilized with 10 mM levamisole in M9 and mounted on a 5% agarose pad; for confocal and Airyscan imaging, pads were supplemented with 20mM sodium azide. Imaging of cytoskeletal protein fusions focused on the mid-L4 stages when alae patterning begins [12]. DIC imaging of alae was done in L4.9 larvae or young (non-gravid) adults. The precise stages of L4 worms were determined based on vulva morphology [49,50].

Transmission electron microscopy

The TEM images of sma-1(e30) (CB30) adults in Fig 3C are archival images from a prior study [51]. For TEM in Fig 7, wild-type (N2) and sma-1(ru18) (AZ30) L4 worms were processed by high pressure freezing starting with 2% OsO4, 0.1% UAc, 2% H2O in acetone [52]. After freeze substitution, specimens were rinsed 4 times in 100% acetone, infiltrated into 2:1 and 1::2 acetone/Spurr resin, and then 4X in 100% Spurr resin prior to curing in a 60-degree oven for 2 days. Seven sma-1(ru18) L4 animals and five additional N2 L4 worms were cut at 70 nm on an MRC PowerTome XL microtome. Sections were either post-stained in 2% Uranyl Acetate in H2O for 20 min, followed by Reynolds lead staining for 3 min, or not stained at all due to good membrane contrast. At least two thin sections from different mid-body regions per animal, separated by 20 μm along the body axis, were observed by electron microscopy. Either a TALOS L120C TEM (Thermofisher, Waltham MA) or a JEOL1400 Flash TEM (Peabody MA) with an AMT digital camera (Waltham MA.) were used. Images were processed in ImageJ [53] and manually pseudocolored in Adobe Illustrator (Adobe, San Jose California). We imaged a total of at least 10 specimens per genotype in order to find 3 N2 and 4 AZ30 mid-L4 specimens at the delamination stage. The N2 specimens were described in our prior study [12].

DiI staining of cuticles

DiI staining to visualize alae was performed as previously described (Schultz and Gumienny 2012). Briefly, young adult worms were washed and pelleted from plates with M9 buffer and incubated in 30 µg/mL of lipophilic DiI stain (Invitrogen, Lumipore) shaking in the dark at 20 °C for 3 hr. After a final M9 wash, the worms were allowed to recover on NGM seeded with OP50 in the dark for 30 minutes before mounting and imaging on the Zeiss Axioskop.

Image Analysis

Alae phenotypes in Figs 3-5 were scored by DIC imaging of late L4 larvae or young (pre-gravid) adults. We captured images of ~75 micron long regions of the alae in the mid-body. These were scored using a rubric with 4 categories: 1) Normal: three continuous ridges with no more than 3 minor interruptions, as sometimes seen in N2; 2) Partially disorganized: four or more alae interruptions interspersed with normal regions, with at least half of the total image appearing normal; 3) Disorganized: consistent aberrations across the entire image, but with only the middle ridge affected; 4) Severely disorganized: tortuous, non-linear appearance of all alae ridges in at least part of the image. Note that the images shown in the figures represent only a partial (24 micron wide) view of the primary images scored.

Fluorescent image measurements and quantifications were performed with ImageJ [53]. Fluorescence intensity quantifications in Figs 6 and 8 used the box Measure tool to calculate total fluorescence within a 1X1 micron square box in the medial seam and/or a 10 pt thick line and the Plot Profile tool to measure peak fluorescence at junctional AFBs. For each animal, three measurements were made at three fixed locations, yielding three medial mean intensity values or six junctional peak values, which were then averaged. Seam width (S3 Fig) quantifications used the line Measure tool with measurements made at six fixed locations per animal and then averaged. For TEM images, matrix slit width quantifications (Fig 7D) used the line Measure tool. Where possible, measurements were made of the four slits on both the left and right sides of two different body regions per specimen (yielding up to 16 measurements per specimen); however, because the precise timing of slit formation varies along the body, some sides or regions did not yet have slits present to measure. Each TEM measurement is shown separately.

For statistical analysis on categorical data presented in Figs 3F, 4B and 5C, phenotypic categories were combined so that outcomes were classified as normal vs abnormal or severe vs other categories for the Fisher’s Exact Test, which was carried out using GraphPad Prism. For continuous measurements presented in Figs 6F, 6H, 7D, and 8E’), data were compared using a non-parametric Mann-Whitney test, which was carried out using the Social Science Statistics Website: https://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/mannwhitney/calculator/. For S3 Fig, where multiple comparisons were made across 4 stages, a Bonferroni corrected p-value of 0.0125 was used as the threshold for significance.

RNA-mediated interference (RNAi)

Bacterial-mediated feeding RNAi was adapted from [54]. To knock down vab-10, sma-1, and act-2, we used sequence-verified plasmids from the Ahringer library. Single colonies of the E. coli strain HT115 (DE3) containing these plasmids were grown in LB and induced with isopropyl β-D- 1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) after ~5–6 hours (1mM for vab-10; 3mM for sma-1; 8mM for act-2) and incubated for a further 1–2 hours before seeding on NGM plates supplemented with 1mM Amp and 1mM (vab-10), 3mM (sma-1), or 8mM (act-2) IPTG. As a control, we used E. coli HT115 (DE3) transformed with the empty vector L4440/ pPD129.36 that produces short dsRNA molecules that do not match any annotated gene of C. elegans. Single L4 hermaphrodites were placed per plate and transferred to fresh plates after 24 hours. The day 2 progeny were imaged by DIC as young adults (vab-10, sma-1) or by confocal microscopy as L4s (act-2). Both vab-10 and act-2 RNAi caused >50% embryonic or early larval lethality under our conditions, so only escapers could be imaged. When present, animals with a small size were prioritized for imaging since they were clearly affected by the RNAi.

Tissue-specific RNAi used the rde-1(ne300) null mutant background [55] with tissue-specific rde-1 + rescue transgenes aaaIs4 (elt-5pro::rde-1+) [12] or mfIs70 (lin-31pro::rde-1+) [27] (see S3 Table for strains).

Data and resource availability

All relevant data are contained within the figures, tables, and supplemental materials. Strains are available at the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (U. Minnesota) or by request from the corresponding author.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Polarized localization of spectrins and ankyrin at the seam and vulva.

Confocal images of spectrin localization at: (A, A’) the apical hypodermis and seam and (B) midsection of a mid-L4 vulva tube. SMA-1::GFP localizes to apical membranes while UNC-70::GFP localizes to basolateral membranes; SPC-1::GFP localizes to all membranes. (C, C’, D) UNC-44::GFP (ankyrin) is basolateral similar to UNC-70. (E) Comparison of apical spectrin and spectraplakin patterns during alae-patterning at mid-L4 (left) vs after alae formation at late L4 (right). Spectrin begins to disperse by late L4, similar to actin [20], while VAB-10 signal increases due to CeHD formation. All images representative of at least n = 10 specimens imaged. See also Movies S1-S5.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012236.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. MUP-4 localization in the L4 stage.

Single confocal slices showing the patterning of MUP-4::GFP at the seam at the indicated L4 substages. MUP-4 starts forming a linear pattern at the medial seam at approximately the L4.5 substage. By L4.8 the signal at the seam intensifies and extends from the middle towards the anterior and posterior ends of the worm but doesn’t localize to the two extreme ends of the worm. (D) Schematic summary. The precise architecture of CeHDs in the mid-body has not yet been investigated, but dorsal vulva cells are known to attach to both the seam and various sex muscles [56].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012236.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. sma-1 mutants have intact cadherin junctions.

(A) Representative epifluorescence images of HMR-1::GFP (cadherin) marking apical junctions between the hyp7 and seam syncytia at mid-L4 substages. (B) Quantification of seam apical width calculated as the average of 6 measurements per worm taken 100px/9.6 um apart. Bars: mean and interquartile range. *p < 0.0125; Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction of 4 stages compared.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012236.s003

(TIF)

S1 Movie. SPC-1::GFP from strain GOU2936.

Related to S1 Fig. Confocal z-stacks of spectrin and spectraplakin fusions at the mid-L4 stage, all shown in inverted grayscale.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012236.s004

(MOV)

S2 Movie. SMA-1::GFP from strain PHX4954.

Related to S1 Fig. Confocal z-stacks of spectrin and spectraplakin fusions at the mid-L4 stage, all shown in inverted grayscale.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012236.s005

(MOV)

S3 Movie. UNC-70::GFP from strain GOU3103.

Related to S1 Fig. Confocal z-stacks of spectrin and spectraplakin fusions at the mid-L4 stage, all shown in inverted grayscale.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012236.s006

(MOV)

S4 Movie. UNC-44::GFP from strain CZ25013.

Related to S1 Fig. Confocal z-stacks of spectrin and spectraplakin fusions at the mid-L4 stage, all shown in inverted grayscale.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012236.s007

(MOV)

S5 Movie. VAB-10a::GFP from strain GOU2043.

Related to S1 Fig. Confocal z-stacks of spectrin and spectraplakin fusions at the mid-L4 stage, all shown in inverted grayscale.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012236.s008

(MOV)

S1 Table. Actin binding protein and CeHD fusion screening.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012236.s009

(PDF)

S2 Table. vab-10 and ifb-1 reduced function mutants have normal alae.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012236.s010

(PDF)

S3 Table. C. elegans strains used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012236.s011

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Nathalie Pujol, Erfei Bi, Paul Janmey, Vivek Shenoy, and members of our lab and of the UPenn worm group for helpful discussions and advice; Matthew Buechner for sharing archival CB30 TEM images; Andrea Stout and the UPenn CDB Microscopy Core (RRID SCR_022373) for training and help with confocal and super-resolution microscopy; Biao Zhao and the UPenn Electron Microscopy Research Laboratory for training and help with electron microscopy; and Jeff Hardin, Bob Goldstein, and Michel Labouesse for strains. Some TEM was performed by K.N. at the Core Facility for Imaging at Queens College, CUNY. Some strains were obtained from the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (U. Minnesota), which is funded by the NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440).

References

  1. 1. Sundaram MV, Pujol N. The Caenorhabditis elegans cuticle and precuticle: a model for studying dynamic apical extracellular matrices in vivo. Genetics. 2024;227(4):iyae072. pmid:38995735
  2. 2. Finet C. Developmental genetics of cuticular micro- and nano-structures in insects. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2024;65:101254. pmid:39182719
  3. 3. Fung W, Kolotuev I, Heiman MG. Specialized structure and function of the apical extracellular matrix at sense organs. Cells Dev. 2024;179:203942. pmid:39067521
  4. 4. Heiman MG, Sundaram MV. Apical Extracellular Matrix Development. Development. 2026.
  5. 5. Fernandes I, Chanut-Delalande H, Ferrer P, Latapie Y, Waltzer L, Affolter M, et al. Zona pellucida domain proteins remodel the apical compartment for localized cell shape changes. Dev Cell. 2010;18(1):64–76. pmid:20152178
  6. 6. Dickinson WJ, Thatcher JW. Morphogenesis of denticles and hairs in Drosophila embryos: involvement of actin-associated proteins that also affect adult structures. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1997;38(1):9–21. pmid:9295137
  7. 7. Totz JF, McDougal AD, Wagner L, Kang S, So PTC, Dunkel J, et al. Cell membrane buckling governs early-stage ridge formation in butterfly wing scales. Cell Rep Phys Sci. 2024;5(7):102063. pmid:40084173
  8. 8. Öztürk-Çolak A, Moussian B, Araújo SJ, Casanova J. A feedback mechanism converts individual cell features into a supracellular ECM structure in Drosophila trachea. Elife. 2016;5:e09373. pmid:26836303
  9. 9. Oh Y, Schreiter JH, Okada H, Wloka C, Okada S, Yan D, et al. Hof1 and Chs4 Interact via F-BAR Domain and Sel1-like Repeats to Control Extracellular Matrix Deposition during Cytokinesis. Curr Biol. 2017;27(18):2878-2886.e5. pmid:28918945
  10. 10. Adler PN. The localization of chitin synthase mediates the patterned deposition of chitin in developing Drosophila bristles. bioRxiv. 2020. 718841.
  11. 11. Uv A, Moussian B. The apical plasma membrane of Drosophila embryonic epithelia. Eur J Cell Biol. 2010;89(2–3):208–11. pmid:19944479
  12. 12. Katz SS, Barker TJ, Maul-Newby HM, Sparacio AP, Nguyen KCQ, Maybrun CL, et al. A transient apical extracellular matrix relays cytoskeletal patterns to shape permanent acellular ridges on the surface of adult C. elegans. PLoS Genet. 2022;18(8):e1010348. pmid:35960773
  13. 13. Forman-Rubinsky R, Cohen JD, Sundaram MV. Lipocalins Are Required for Apical Extracellular Matrix Organization and Remodeling in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2017;207(2):625–42. pmid:28842397
  14. 14. Liem RKH. Cytoskeletal Integrators: The Spectrin Superfamily. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2016;8(10):a018259. pmid:27698030
  15. 15. Duan R, Kim JH, Shilagardi K, Schiffhauer ES, Lee DM, Son S, et al. Spectrin is a mechanoresponsive protein shaping fusogenic synapse architecture during myoblast fusion. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20(6):688–98. pmid:29802406
  16. 16. Mylvaganam S, Plumb J, Yusuf B, Li R, Lu C-Y, Robinson LA, et al. The spectrin cytoskeleton integrates endothelial mechanoresponses. Nat Cell Biol. 2022;24(8):1226–38. pmid:35817960
  17. 17. Leterrier C, Pullarkat PA. Mechanical role of the submembrane spectrin scaffold in red blood cells and neurons. J Cell Sci. 2022;135(16):jcs259356. pmid:35972759
  18. 18. Praitis V, Ciccone E, Austin J. SMA-1 spectrin has essential roles in epithelial cell sheet morphogenesis in C. elegans. Dev Biol. 2005;283(1):157–70. pmid:15890334
  19. 19. Norman KR, Moerman DG. Alpha spectrin is essential for morphogenesis and body wall muscle formation in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol. 2002;157(4):665–77. pmid:11994313
  20. 20. Barker TJ, Chan F-Y, Carvalho AX, Sundaram MV. Apical-basal polarity of the spectrin cytoskeleton in the C. elegans vulva. MicroPubl Biol. 2023;2023:10.17912/micropub.biology.000863. pmid:37396793
  21. 21. Fu R, Jiang X, Huang Z, Zhang H. The spectraplakins of Caenorhabditis elegans: Cytoskeletal crosslinkers and beyond. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2017;69:58–68. pmid:28619622
  22. 22. Bosher JM, Hahn B-S, Legouis R, Sookhareea S, Weimer RM, Gansmuller A, et al. The Caenorhabditis elegans vab-10 spectraplakin isoforms protect the epidermis against internal and external forces. J Cell Biol. 2003;161(4):757–68. pmid:12756232
  23. 23. Woo W-M, Goncharov A, Jin Y, Chisholm AD. Intermediate filaments are required for C. elegans epidermal elongation. Dev Biol. 2004;267(1):216–29. pmid:14975728
  24. 24. Hong L, Elbl T, Ward J, Franzini-Armstrong C, Rybicka KK, Gatewood BK, et al. MUP-4 is a novel transmembrane protein with functions in epithelial cell adhesion in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol. 2001;154(2):403–14. pmid:11470827
  25. 25. Jia R, Li D, Li M, Chai Y, Liu Y, Xie Z, et al. Spectrin-based membrane skeleton supports ciliogenesis. PLoS Biol. 2019;17(7):e3000369. pmid:31299042
  26. 26. Katsanos D, Ferrando-Marco M, Razzaq I, Aughey G, Southall TD, Barkoulas M. Gene expression profiling of epidermal cell types in C. elegans using Targeted DamID. Development. 2021;148(17):dev199452. pmid:34397094
  27. 27. Barkoulas M, van Zon JS, Milloz J, van Oudenaarden A, Félix M-A. Robustness and epistasis in the C. elegans vulval signaling network revealed by pathway dosage modulation. Dev Cell. 2013;24(1):64–75. pmid:23328399
  28. 28. Podbilewicz B, White JG. Cell fusions in the developing epithelial of C. elegans. Dev Biol. 1994;161(2):408–24. pmid:8313992
  29. 29. Sobral AF, Chan F-Y, Norman MJ, Osório DS, Dias AB, Ferreira V, et al. Plastin and spectrin cooperate to stabilize the actomyosin cortex during cytokinesis. Curr Biol. 2021;31(24):5415-5428.e10. pmid:34666005
  30. 30. Sala S, Oakes PW. Stress fiber strain recognition by the LIM protein testin is cryptic and mediated by RhoA. Mol Biol Cell. 2021;32(18):1758–71. pmid:34038160
  31. 31. Zsolnay V, Gardel ML, Kovar DR, Voth GA. Cracked actin filaments as mechanosensitive receptors. Biophys J. 2024;123(19):3283–94. pmid:38894540
  32. 32. Sun X, Phua DYZ, Axiotakis L Jr, Smith MA, Blankman E, Gong R, et al. Mechanosensing through Direct Binding of Tensed F-Actin by LIM Domains. Dev Cell. 2020;55(4):468-482.e7. pmid:33058779
  33. 33. Lynch AM, Zhu Y, Lucas BG, Winkelman JD, Bai K, Martin SCT, et al. TES-1/Tes and ZYX-1/Zyxin protect junctional actin networks under tension during epidermal morphogenesis in the C. elegans embryo. Curr Biol. 2022;32:5189–99.e6.
  34. 34. Ramalho JJ, Sepers JJ, Nicolle O, Schmidt R, Cravo J, Michaux G, et al. C-terminal phosphorylation modulates ERM-1 localization and dynamics to control cortical actin organization and support lumen formation during Caenorhabditiselegans development. Development. 2020;147(14):dev188011. pmid:32586975
  35. 35. Mylvaganam S, Riedl M, Vega A, Collins RF, Jaqaman K, Grinstein S, et al. Stabilization of Endothelial Receptor Arrays by a Polarized Spectrin Cytoskeleton Facilitates Rolling and Adhesion of Leukocytes. Cell Rep. 2020;31(12):107798. pmid:32579925
  36. 36. Freeman SA, Vega A, Riedl M, Collins RF, Ostrowski PP, Woods EC. Transmembrane pickets connect cyto- and pericellular skeletons forming barriers to receptor engagement. Cell. 2018;172:305-317.e10.
  37. 37. Jacobson K, Liu P, Lagerholm BC. The Lateral Organization and Mobility of Plasma Membrane Components. Cell. 2019;177(4):806–19. pmid:31051105
  38. 38. Harris AK, Stopak D, Wild P. Fibroblast traction as a mechanism for collagen morphogenesis. Nature. 1981;290(5803):249–51. pmid:7207616
  39. 39. Ma X, Schickel ME, Stevenson MD, Sarang-Sieminski AL, Gooch KJ, Ghadiali SN, et al. Fibers in the extracellular matrix enable long-range stress transmission between cells. Biophys J. 2013;104(7):1410–8. pmid:23561517
  40. 40. Wang H, Abhilash AS, Chen CS, Wells RG, Shenoy VB. Long-range force transmission in fibrous matrices enabled by tension-driven alignment of fibers. Biophys J. 2014;107(11):2592–603. pmid:25468338
  41. 41. Chen X, Chen D, Ban E, Toussaint KC, Janmey PA, Wells RG, et al. Glycosaminoglycans modulate long-range mechanical communication between cells in collagen networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119(15):e2116718119. pmid:35394874
  42. 42. Wang Q, Zhao X. A three-dimensional phase diagram of growth-induced surface instabilities. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8887. pmid:25748825
  43. 43. Chitwood BG, Chitwood MBH. Introduction to nematology. University Park Press. 1974.
  44. 44. Malakhov VV. Nematodes: Structure, Development, Classification, and Phylogeny. Hope D. Washington. 1994.
  45. 45. Tilney LG, Connelly PS, Vranich KA, Shaw MK, Guild GM. Regulation of actin filament cross-linking and bundle shape in Drosophila bristles. J Cell Biol. 2000;148(1):87–100. pmid:10629220
  46. 46. Guild GM, Connelly PS, Ruggiero L, Vranich KA, Tilney LG. Long continuous actin bundles in Drosophila bristles are constructed by overlapping short filaments. J Cell Biol. 2003;162(6):1069–77. pmid:12975350
  47. 47. Sternberg PW, Van Auken K, Wang Q, Wright A, Yook K, Zarowiecki M. WormBase 2024: status and transitioning to Alliance infrastructure. Genetics. 2024;227:iyae050.
  48. 48. Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974;77(1):71–94. pmid:4366476
  49. 49. Mok DZL, Sternberg PW, Inoue T. Morphologically defined sub-stages of C. elegans vulval development in the fourth larval stage. BMC Dev Biol. 2015;15:26. pmid:26066484
  50. 50. Cohen JD, Sparacio AP, Belfi AC, Forman-Rubinsky R, Hall DH, Maul-Newby H, et al. A multi-layered and dynamic apical extracellular matrix shapes the vulva lumen in Caenorhabditis elegans. Elife. 2020;9:e57874. pmid:32975517
  51. 51. Yang Z, Mattingly BC, Hall DH, Ackley BD, Buechner M. Terminal web and vesicle trafficking proteins mediate nematode single-cell tubulogenesis. J Cell Biol. 2020;219(11):e202003152. pmid:32860501
  52. 52. Hall DH, Hartwieg E, Nguyen KCQ. Modern electron microscopy methods for C. elegans. Methods Cell Biol. 2012;107:93–149. pmid:22226522
  53. 53. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):676–82. pmid:22743772
  54. 54. Kamath RS, Fraser AG, Dong Y, Poulin G, Durbin R, Gotta M, et al. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature. 2003;421(6920):231–7. pmid:12529635
  55. 55. Tabara H, Sarkissian M, Kelly WG, Fleenor J, Grishok A, Timmons L, et al. The rde-1 gene, RNA interference, and transposon silencing in C. elegans. Cell. 1999;99(2):123–32. pmid:10535731
  56. 56. Sharma-Kishore R, White JG, Southgate E, Podbilewicz B. Formation of the vulva in Caenorhabditis elegans: a paradigm for organogenesis. Development. 1999;126(4):691–9. pmid:9895317