Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Examining the association between fetal HLA-C, maternal KIR haplotypes and birth weight

  • Caitlin Stephanie Decina ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    cd629@exeter.ac.uk

    Affiliations Department of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom, Centre for Population and Disease Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

  • Nicole M. Warrington,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Centre for Population and Disease Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, Frazer Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

  • Robin N. Beaumont,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom

  • Beilei Bian,

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Centre for Population and Disease Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

  • Caroline Brito Nunes,

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Centre for Population and Disease Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

  • Geng Wang,

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Centre for Population and Disease Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

  • William L. Lowe Jr,

    Roles Data curation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America

  • David Squire,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources, Software, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Mathematics and Statistics, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Melbourne Integrative Genomics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

  • Damjan Vukcevic,

    Roles Methodology, Software, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Mathematics and Statistics, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Melbourne Integrative Genomics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

  • Stephen Leslie,

    Roles Methodology, Software, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Mathematics and Statistics, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

  • Rachel M. Freathy ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ These authors jointly directed to this work.

    Affiliation Department of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom

  • David M. Evans

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ These authors jointly directed to this work.

    Affiliations Centre for Population and Disease Genomics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, Frazer Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom

Abstract

Human birth weight is under stabilizing selection, seeking balance between extremes of high and low, thereby reducing fetal and maternal perinatal mortality risk. Certain combinations of maternal killer immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) and paternally derived fetal human leuokocyte antigen-C (HLA-C) alleles were previously associated with higher risk of high and low birth weight in a study with limited sample size (n = 1,316). Using recently developed methods to impute HLA and KIR haplotypes using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype data, we tested associations of fetal HLA and maternal KIR genotypes with offspring birth weight in a large sample. We imputed KIR haplotypes using the KIR*IMP imputation software in 10,602 mother-offspring pairs of European descent from singleton pregnancies from five studies. Using mixed linear regression models to account for mothers with multiple children, we tested associations between maternal KIR A vs B haplotypes (AA, AB/BA, BB genotypes) as well as copy number of activating receptor gene KIR2DS1 (0, 1, 2 copies of the gene) in the presence of fetal HLA C1/C2 alleles, and offspring birth weight. Associations were analyzed in each cohort before performing a meta-analysis to estimate the interaction effects between maternal KIR and fetal HLA-C2 on birth weight across the entire sample. The KIR haplotypes achieved imputation accuracy estimated at >95% in most of the cohorts. No interaction effects were observed between either the maternal A vs. B haplotype or the maternal KIR2DS1 locus and fetal HLA-C. When specifically trying to replicate the previously associated combination of maternal KIR2DS1 and paternally inherited fetal HLA-C2, there was a negligible change in offspring birth weight for each additional KIR2DS1 allele and HLA-C2 of paternal origin (7g lower birth weight per allele [95% CI: -54, 40], P = 0.78). We found little evidence of association between birth weight and maternal KIR haplotypes or fetal HLA-C2 and were unable to replicate previously reported findings. Our observations reinforce the importance of replication and the use of large sample sizes in the validation of genetic associations.

Author summary

Babies born with very high or low birth weights and their mothers are at a higher risk of illness and death than babies with weights close to average. Genes involved in the maternal immune system, called “KIR”, and the fetal immune system, called “HLA-C”, are important for early development of the placenta. Previously published research using a small sample has provided evidence for the role of interacting combinations of these genes in driving the spectrum of birth weight and maintaining the balancing selection of mother-child physiology that results in healthy birth outcomes. Here we harness recently developed methods to impute these genetic data to test associations of maternal KIR and fetal HLA with child’s birth weight in a larger sample. By examining >10,000 European ancestry mother-child pairs, we found no relationship between child’s birth weight and any of the genetic combinations we tested of KIR in the mother and HLA-C in the fetus. We show that despite biological plausibility, it is important to validate genetic associations through replication and using the largest sample sizes possible. Future research could benefit from including birth weights in the true extremes of the spectrum, using methods such as high throughput genome sequencing technologies which could provide more accurate data for these gene regions on a larger scale, and investigation in ancestrally diverse populations.

Introduction

Human birth weight is under stabilizing selection, seeking a balance between extremes of high and low in order to optimize pregnancy outcomes and reduce the risk of fetal and maternal perinatal mortality [1]. Very low birth weight is associated with greater risk of stillbirth and preterm labour, and increased offspring cardiometabolic risk in later life [24]. Conversely when babies are born very large, the mother is at risk of experiencing prolonged obstructed labour, which may lead to haemorrhage and/or sepsis. Likewise, the child is at risk of shoulder dystocia and asphyxiation during birth, as well as cardiometabolic morbidities in later life [5,6].

Whilst mother and offspring share 50% of their nuclear genomes, they are antigenically distinct. Thus, invading fetal trophoblast cells will express molecules encoded by paternal genes, identifying the fetus as ‘non-self’ to the mother. This dynamic brings into play aspects of the immune system, namely the interaction between maternal killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) expressed on uterine natural killer cells (uNK) and human leuokocyte antigen-C (HLA-C) present on fetal trophoblast cells [7,8]. The HLA-C gene belongs to the HLA class I region (corresponding to major histocompatibility complex [MHC] class I), a highly variable region of the genome that plays a key role in antigen presentation from intracellular sources (including from invading intracellular pathogens), and recognition of one’s own cells [9]. HLA-C is the dominant ligand for KIRs in humans and is categorized into two groups: C1 and C2 based on the amino acid present at position 80 [10,11]. HLA-C binding with KIRs regulates uNK function and trophoblast invasion into the uterine wall by producing either positive or negative signals via cytokine secretion depending on whether the KIR possesses activating or inhibitory function [1215]. KIR genotypes can be grouped into two broad haplotypes, A and B, based on their gene content. The KIR A haplotype contains fewer genes which encode mostly inhibitory receptors which bind HLA-C, while the KIR B haplotype contains numerous genes encoding mainly activating receptors, although only one, KIR2DS1, can bind with HLA-C [16,17]. Both HLA-C and KIR genes are highly polymorphic, meaning there are many possible maternal KIR and fetal HLA-C genetic combinations arising from great numbers of genotypes and considerable haplotype diversity [9,18].

Certain combinations of maternal KIR and fetal HLA-C alleles have been previously associated with birth weight. Specifically, Hiby et al. 2014 reported that the cytokine-inhibiting maternal KIR AA genotype was observed more frequently in low birth weight pregnancies, while the cytokine-activating maternal KIR BB genotype was observed more frequently in high birth weight pregnancies compared to average birth weight pregnancies [19]. When investigating the effect of the maternal KIR2DS1 locus and combinations of fetal HLA-C2 alleles on birth weight, the authors found an average increase in birth weight of ~250g in pregnancies where the mother possessed KIR2DS1 and the fetus possessed more HLA-C2 alleles than their mother. This was in comparison to pregnancies where mothers had 0 copies of KIR2DS1 and the fetus had fewer or equal numbers of C2 alleles compared with their mother. It is worth noting that the effect sizes reported in the Hiby et al. study are an order of magnitude greater than the main effect of other common variants that have been robustly associated with birth weight [1921]. The authors also found that maternal KIR2DS1 was only associated with increased offspring birth weight when the fetal C2 allele was paternally inherited compared to maternally inherited [19]. Fetal growth and birth size are dependent on sufficient nutrient delivery via the placental spiral arteries [22,23]. These associations are consistent with KIR and HLA molecule interaction in transformation of the spiral arteries [12], i.e., combinations of fetal HLA-C2 and maternal activating genotypes (KIR BB) may excessively promote arterial transformation, enhancing fetal growth, whilst combinations of fetal C2 and maternal inhibitory genotypes (KIR AA) may insufficiently promote arterial transformation, leading to reduced fetal growth [17].

However, the sample size of the Hiby et al. study was small (n = 1,316 pregnancies), especially compared with recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) [20,21], and though single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the HLA and KIR gene clusters have been identified as associated with birth weight in GWAS [20,21], the key interaction findings have not been tested for replication in large independent samples to date. Whilst direct genotyping of KIR and HLA regions is costly and time intensive, statistical methods are now available to impute HLA and KIR haplotypes using SNP genotyping data [2427] and provide an opportunity to investigate HLA/KIR interactions in much larger samples.

In this study we used statistical imputation of genome-wide SNP data to generate HLA and KIR information in five cohorts containing large numbers of mother-offspring pairs (total n = 10,602). Using the estimated KIR haplotypes and HLA-C genotypes, we tested for association between birth weight and maternal KIR/fetal HLA-C genetic combinations.

Methods

Ethics statement

The UK Biobank has approval from the North West Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee (MREC) as a Research Tissue Bank (RTB) approval. Participants provided written informed consent.

Ethical approval for the Exeter Family Study of Childhood Health was given by the North and East Devon (UK) Local Research Ethics Committee (approval number 1104), and written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the newborns.

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) Ethics and Law Committee and the Local Research Ethics Committees. Informed consent for the use of data collected via questionnaires and clinics was obtained from participants following the recommendations of the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee at the time. Consent for biological samples has been collected in accordance with the Human Tissue Act (2004). ALSPAC used a combination of written informed consent for biological samples and clinical assessments, and implied consent for data collected via returned postal or online questionnaires. Study participants have the right to withdraw their consent for elements of the study or from the study entirely. Full details of the ALSPAC consent procedures are available on the study website (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/research-ethics/).

Ethics approval was obtained for the main platform study and all of the individual sub-studies from the Bradford Research Ethics Committee.

Study populations

UK Biobank.

The UK Biobank (UKB) is a large prospective cohort study of 500,000 participants from across the UK, aged 40–69 years at baseline, with genetic and phenotypic data collected between 2006 and 2010. The study has collected a wide range of data via various modes of assessment including self-completed questionnaire, interview, physical and functional measures, and sample assays of blood, urine and saliva [28]. Through questionnaire, participants were asked to report their own birth weight and (in the case of mothers) the birth weight of their first child.

We used the raw, version 2 genotype data released by UKB in July 2017. DNA was extracted from stored participant blood samples collected at UKB assessment centres and genotyped using the UK BiLEVE Axiom Array by Affymetrix and the closely related UKB Axiom Array [29]. Genotyping quality control (QC) and derivation of individuals’ genetic ancestry via principal component analysis (PCA) using flashPCA [30] has been described elsewhere [29]. We restricted the sample to mother-offspring pairs according to kinship coefficients estimated by KING software [31], excluding participants who did not pass genotyping QC and those who had elected to withdraw from UKB as of February 2022, leaving 8,498 individuals (4,249 mother-offspring pairs) for analysis. For KIR imputation purposes, the raw genotype data was imputed against the Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC) v1.1 reference panel [32] in genome build 37 using the Michigan imputation server (https://imputationserver.sph.umich.edu/index.html#!) with Minimac4 software [33,34] and phased using Eagle v2.4 [35].

Exeter Family Study of Childhood Health (EFSOCH).

The EFSOCH study is a prospective study of children born between 2000 and 2004 and their parents, from a postcode-defined area of Exeter, UK, designed to select a European-ancestry cohort for population homogeneity. Detailed anthropometric measurements were taken and DNA was obtained from fasting blood samples from both parents collected at the study visit at 28 weeks’ gestation. Birth measures of children were performed within 12 hours of delivery with birth weight being recorded to the nearest 10 grams. Offspring DNA was obtained from umbilical cord blood at delivery and extracted from spun white cells [36]. Genotyping of EFSOCH samples (n = 969 mothers, 937 fathers and 862 children) was performed using the Illumina Infinium HumanCoreExome-24 array (n = 551,839 SNPs/indels). QC procedures excluded based on DNA sample call rate <98% (n = 50 individuals excluded), SNP call rate <95% (n = 13,151 SNPs excluded), minor allele frequency <1% (n = 257,289 further SNPs excluded), Hardy-Weinberg P < 1 × 10−6 (n = 455 further SNPs excluded), sex mismatch between phenotypic sex and genotypically-derived sex (n = 13 individuals excluded), kinship errors after estimation using King [31] (n = 22 individuals excluded), and PC analysis outliers >4.56 SD from the European cluster mean after analysis to determine ancestry of the sample using flashPCA [37] (n = 21 individuals excluded). This left 2,664 individuals available for analysis who were imputed to the TOPMed r2 reference panel [38] via the TOPMed Imputation Server (https://imputation.biodatacatalyst.nhlbi.nih.gov/) with Minimac4 software [33,34] and phased using Eagle v2.4 [35].

Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study.

The HAPO study is an observational study which sought to determine the risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with varying levels of maternal glucose not severe enough to constitute diabetes mellitus. Pregnant women across 15 field centres in nine countries underwent a standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at ~28 weeks’ gestation (between 24 and 32 weeks) [39]. Within 72 hours of delivery, neonatal anthropometrics, including birth weight, were recorded using standardized methods across all centres [40].

At the time of OGTT, blood was collected from participating women from which DNA was isolated, while newborn DNA was isolated from umbilical cord blood samples taken at the time of delivery [41]. A total of 2000 mothers and babies (1000 mother-offspring pairs) included in the current study were genotyped using the Illumina Infinium Global Screening Array. QC was performed, and where individuals with genotype call rate <97.5% (82 samples) were removed and SNPs were removed if they had call rates <98% (2.9% of SNPs) or Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) P < 1x10-6 (0.05% of SNPs). Genetically determined sex was compared with phenotypically determined sex, excluding samples where conflicts were identified (17 samples). Relationships for mother-offspring pairs were confirmed using KING software [31], applying default King thresholds for kinship, with samples excluded where the expected relationship did not match the reported relationship (14 samples). To derive the genetic ancestry of individuals, principal components (PC) analysis was performed on the genotype data using flashPCA [42]. Visual inspection of PC plots identified outlying individuals for exclusion who did not fit within an ancestry PC cluster (155 samples removed).

Following QC, 1,734 (including 565 complete mother-offspring pairs) individuals and 671,798 SNPs were available for further genetic association analysis. These were imputed using the TOPMed Imputation Server [33,34], phased via Eagle v2.4 [35], and imputed against the TOPMed r2 reference panel [38].

Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC).

The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) is a prospective observational cohort study. All pregnant women living in a defined area of Avon, UK (an old administrative county in the Southwest of England comprising the city of Bristol and surrounding areas) expected to have a live birth between 1st April 1991 and 31st December 1992 were eligible for participation. Initial recruitment gave rise to 14,541 pregnancies of which there were 14,676 known fetuses, resulting in 14,062 live-born children. Among those live births, 13,988 were alive at 1 year of age [43,44]. Phenotypic data for both mothers and children were extracted from medical records, where child’s birth weight was obtained (in grams) from obstetric clinical records. Repeated blood sampling at routine antenatal clinical visits and at follow-up clinics for mothers and children allowed for creation of a DNA bank including 11,343 children and 10,321 mothers [43,44]. Maternal genome-wide SNP data were obtained using the Illumina 660 Quad Array, and children’s data were genotyped using the Illumina 550 Quad Array. QC involved exclusion based on MAF < 1%, HWE < 1 × 10-6, sex mismatch, kinship errors, and 4.56 SD from the cluster mean of any sub-populations cluster [45]. Ancestry PCs were generated in the 1000 Genomes sample in order to classify individuals according to the 3 main 1000 genomes populations (European, African, South Asian) and separate out those of European genetic similarity [45]. Following QC, genotype data were imputed against the HRC v1.1 reference panel using the Michigan imputation server [33,34] and phased via Eagle v2.4 [35], giving rise to 17,827 individuals of mainly genetically defined European ancestry with genetic data for further analysis.

Born in Bradford (BiB).

Born in Bradford (BiB) is a multi-ethnic cohort (largely bi-ethnic with populations of Pakistani and White British individuals) study established in 2007 in Bradford, UK. Women targeted for recruitment were all those booked in for delivery at the Bradford Royal Infirmary and offered an OGTT at approximately 28 weeks’ gestation. Between March 2007 and November 2010, > 80% of women who attended the OGTT enrolled in the study (12,453 women with 13,776 pregnancies). At recruitment, women completed a comprehensive interviewer-administered questionnaire, were weighed and measured, and had blood and urine samples taken. At birth, infants’ anthropometry was assessed, and umbilical cord samples were collected. From these maternal and infant blood samples, DNA was extracted for approximately 10,000 mother-offspring pairs [46,47]. Maternal and fetal samples were genotyped using two separate chips, an Illumina HumanCoreExome (CE) array and Illumina Infinium Global Screening array (GSA) [48]. Individuals were excluded based on mismatch between genotypically-derived sex and documented phenotypic sex (n = 110), being genetic duplicates (n = 127), or mismatch among reported first-degree relative relationships (n = 470), comprising 707 total exclusions, approximately 3.5% of the original sample. PC analysis was performed using flashPCA software [42], and the first two PCs were used to classify individuals’ ancestry as either White European or South Asian. We restricted our study sample to those of genetically defined European ancestry, which left 7,610 individuals for analysis: 5,709 genotyped on the CE array (2,405 offspring, 3,302 mothers) and 1901 on GSA array (614 offspring, 728 mothers; note fathers were also included in this group).

Variant filtering was performed prior to imputation where steps included the removal of SNPs with a call rate <95%, MAF < 0.01 and HWE P < 1x10-6, as well as palindromic SNPs, duplicated SNPs, indels, and non-autosomal SNPs. After QC, the number of variants totalled n = 252,170 CE European, n = 471,297 GSA European. Imputation of samples was performed using the Michigan imputation server (Minimac4) [33,34]. Phasing was performed using Eagle v2.4 [35]. Genotype imputation was performed using the HRC v1.1 as the reference panel [32]. After imputation, variants with poor estimated imputation accuracy (R2 < 0.3) were removed.

Imputation of KIR types

Imputation of KIR types was performed using the KIR*IMP software [24]. KIR*IMP provides estimates of gene copy number, KIR A or B haplotype, as well as gene-content haplotypes for each individual using a reference panel of 301 SNPs constructed from a U.K. cohort of European ancestry. Using the SNP intersection between the input dataset and the reference panel, i.e., only the SNPs shared between the input dataset and the reference panel, the imputation software fits a random-forest model [49] to the reference panel using only the intersecting SNPs. The software outputs the imputed KIR types with the most likely allele and its associated posterior probability at each locus along with estimates of the average imputation accuracy for each KIR locus. The accuracy estimates are the out-of-bag (OOB) accuracy calculated during the model-fitting process, which are shown to mimic cross-validation error rates and thus provide reliable estimates of KIR imputation performance – see Vukcevic et al. 2015 [24].

For each cohort, SNP genotypes from a segment of chromosome 19 encompassing the KIR region (53,000,000–58,000,000 bp in human genome build 37) were first extracted using the plink2 [50,51] software. To prioritise KIR imputation accuracy, we used the tools for the initial SNP genotype imputation (software and reference panel) that provided the greatest level of accuracy in each individual study. Although these tools varied among the studies, it ensured maximum SNP genotype estimation accuracy, which had important consequences for the success of the KIR haplotype estimation. SNP variants used in the KIR*IMP reference panel were then extracted from the imputed genotype cohort data and checked for consistency of allele frequency. Variants with discrepancy in frequency between the imputed SNP and the KIR reference panel were excluded prior to KIR imputation. These included SNPs with a difference in allelic frequency between the cohort and KIR reference panel greater than 10% or those with ambiguity around the 50% frequency mark, i.e., where both alleles within the cohort dataset had a frequency ≥45% but ≤55% or, when comparing to the reference panel, the same allele had a frequency ≤55% in one dataset and ≥45% in the other. Any palindromic SNPs exhibiting errors in strand alignment were flipped to align with the reference panel. Complete.haps and.sample files for the UKB, EFSOCH, and HAPO cohorts were then uploaded to the KIR*IMP server. Due to data sharing permissions for the ALSPAC and BiB cohorts, KIR imputation for these datasets necessitated the setup of a local KIR*IMP server environment where the imputation was performed using the software within the University of Exeter’s High Performance Computing cluster rather than uploading the files to the external KIR*IMP server. From the imputation output, we used the posterior probabilities assigned to each allele to calculate a dosage which was then used to model each individual’s estimated KIR type.

Imputation of HLA types

In the UKB, HLA alleles were imputed to a multi-population reference panel centrally by UKB using the HLA*IMP:02 [25] software. HLA genotypes were imputed at four-digit (also known as two-field) resolution for 11 classical HLA genes, indicating both the serological antigen grouping or allele family (first field, e.g., HLA-C*01) and the subtype of the allele encoding the specific HLA protein (second field, e.g., HLA-C*01:01) [52]. A quality metric (Q) is reported of the absolute posterior probability of the allele inference for each genotype call [29]. We then used Q to determine a hard call for each HLA genotype to use in our association analyses. For EFSOCH, ALSPAC, and BiB, HLA alleles were imputed locally using SNP2HLA [26] software from which the dosages for the HLA-C alleles were extracted for analysis. As the BiB data were originally genotyped on the two different arrays, imputation was performed for each group separately and then merged into one dataset prior to association analyses. We imputed HLA data for the HAPO study, using a multi-ethnic HLA reference panel and the Michigan imputation server (Minimac4) [27], applied to extracted genotype data from 26,000,000–34,000,000 bp (human genome build 37) on chromosome six. After HLA data for each cohort was imputed and the dosage data or Q-values were extracted specific to the necessary HLA-C alleles, all dosages/Q-values were converted to hard calls using set thresholds as follows: 0 = dosage ≤ 0.3; 1 = dosage ≥ 0.7 and ≤1.3; 2 = dosage ≥1.7, otherwise set to missing. For association analyses, we derived HLA-C1 or -C2 group alleles according to their allele families based on the amino acid at position 80, with the C1 ligand carrying asparagine (HLA-C*01, 03, 07, 08, 12, 14, 16 alleles), and C2 carrying lysine (HLA-C*02, 04, 05, 06, 15, 17, 18 alleles) in alignment with previously published studies [10,11].

A summary of all genotype and HLA imputation software used, genotype imputation reference panels used, amount of KIR region SNP overlap with the KIR*IMP reference panel, final number of SNPs used for KIR imputation, and KIR imputation sample sizes are found in Table 1.

thumbnail
Table 1. Overview of genotyping, HLA, and KIR imputation materials.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012102.t001

Association between maternal KIR types, fetal HLA-C, and offspring birth weight

We performed multivariable mixed linear regression to explore the association between offspring birth weight and maternal KIR A vs B haplotypes (AA, AB/BA, BB genotypes) as well as the amount of KIR2DS1 (0, 1, 2 copies of the gene) in the mothers under 3 different conditions of fetal HLA: in the presence of fetal HLA-C2 (coded as 0 or 1 for C2 group allele), in the presence of more HLA-C2 alleles in the fetus relative to the mother (i.e. mC1C1/fC1C2 and mC1C2/fC2C2), and when fetal HLA-C2 is inferred to be inherited from the father (i.e. mC1C1/fC1C2); models are described in Table 2. These groupings of subjects and the combinations analyzed were defined in accordance with those previously investigated by Hiby et al. 2014 [19]. For inferred inheritance of fetal HLA-C2 from the father, mother-child pairs where both mother and offspring were heterozygous (mC1C2/fC1C2) were not included in the analysis as paternal origin could not be determined unambiguously. Mixed linear regression models were used to account for mothers with multiple offspring in the sample, with mother’s ID set as a random effect. Our study sample included only singleton pregnancies from live births carried to term (≥37 weeks and <43 weeks) according to gestational age data where available (information on gestational age is unavailable in UKB). For each cohort prior to modelling, we used its sample size to estimate the number of standard deviations within which most birth weight observations are expected to fall (EFSOCH = 3, HAPO = 4, ALSPAC = 4, BiB = 4 SDs, respectively). Birth weight observations outside of this range were classified as outliers and excluded prior to analysis (observations excluded: EFSOCH = 0, HAPO = 474, ALSPAC = 138, BiB = 5). For UKB specifically, where there were individuals with birth weight self-reported at multiple assessment centre visits, we took the mean of the multiple values, otherwise taking the single visit where they had data. If there was a difference in absolute value of multiple reported birth weights ≥1 kg, the individual was excluded. Birth weights <2.5 kg or >4.5 kg were also excluded from analysis for the UKB sample to reduce bias from possible reporting errors and to ensure, as far as possible, that preterm births were removed as information on gestational age was not available. This left final mother-offspring pair sample sizes for performing association analyses as follows: UKB = 3,165, EFSOCH = 625, HAPO = 470, ASLPAC = 4,550, and BiB = 1,792 (Table 3). All models were adjusted for offspring sex, gestational age (except UKB), genotyping batch, the first five genome-wide principal components (PCs) in the mother and offspring, and year of birth (UKB only). All analyses were conducted separately in each cohort before performing a fixed effect, inverse-variance weighted meta-analysis to estimate the interaction effects between maternal KIR and fetal HLA on birth weight across the entire study population. Characteristics of each population sample are described in Table 3.

thumbnail
Table 2. Models of the associations tested between maternal KIR types, fetal HLA-C2, and offspring birth weight.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012102.t002

thumbnail
Table 3. Descriptive characteristics for participants in each cohort.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012102.t003

Results

Quality of KIR imputation

The KIR types across the five study populations were well imputed, achieving both high estimated imputation accuracy and posterior probabilities overall. Imputation accuracy was estimated at over 95% for both the KIR2DS1 locus and the A vs. B haplotype, with the exception of imputation of the A vs. B haplotype in the ALSPAC and BiB cohorts where accuracy was 81% accuracy (Table 4). The ALSPAC and BiB genotype data was more limited in its ability to be imputed due to the coverage of this region on the genotyping chip and thus did not achieve as high a broad haplotype estimation but still provided reasonable confidence at an accuracy over 80%.

thumbnail
Table 4. Estimated KIR imputation accuracy across all cohorts for the KIR A vs. B haplotype and KIR2DS1 locus.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012102.t004

Little evidence of association between offspring birth weight and maternal KIR types or fetal HLA-C2

After meta-analysing the maternal KIR and fetal HLA effects on birth weight across the five cohorts of mother-offspring pairs, no interaction effect was observed between either the maternal A vs. B haplotype or the maternal KIR2DS1 locus and fetal HLA-C2 when C2 was present in the fetus (yes vs. no; models 1 & 2), when the fetus had more C2 compared to the mother (models 3 & 4), and when fetal C2 was paternal in origin (models 5 & 6). Under each condition of fetal HLA-C2, no change in offspring birth weight was found for each additional maternal B allele or KIR2DS1 allele, with nearly all effect estimates close to the null with wide confidence intervals (Figs 1 and 2, respectively). When performing a sensitivity analysis removing the UKB cohort, as the only sample with birth weight not adjusted for gestational age, the results were unchanged (see S1 and S2 Figs).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Meta-analysis of the estimated change in offspring birth weight (g) for each additional maternal KIR B allele.

(A) In the presence of fetal HLA-C2 (n = 10,591). (B) In the presence of more HLA-C2 alleles in the fetus relative to the mother (n = 10,562). (C) When fetal HLA-C2 is paternal in origin (n = 10,589).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012102.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. Meta-analysis of the estimated change in offspring birth weight (g) for each additional maternal KIR2DS1 allele.

(A) In the presence of fetal HLA-C2 (n = 10,591). (B) In the presence of more HLA-C2 alleles in the fetus relative to the mother (n = 10,562). (C) When fetal HLA-C2 is paternal in origin (n = 10,589).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012102.g002

Discussion

In our investigation combining data from five different study populations, we found little evidence that maternal KIR haplotype was associated with a change in offspring birth weight in the presence of fetal HLA-C2. There were also no associations observed with birth weight when examining the dosage of the activating receptor-encoding KIR2DS1 gene, when the fetus possessed more HLA-C2 than the mother, or when the fetal HLA-C2 was paternal in origin. This contrasts with the findings of Hiby et al. 2014 [19] where the presence of maternal KIR2DS1 combined with fetal C2 of paternal origin resulted in an average increase in birth weight of ∼250 g (total n = 1,316 pregnancies) compared to offspring without maternal KIR2DS1 and less or equal fetal C2; we observed a null effect in a sample of approximately 10,600 pairs, which was an order of magnitude larger than that of Hiby et al.

We aimed to replicate these associations but were unable to find evidence of an association between HLA and KIR combinations with birth weight. Rather than test presence vs. absence of maternal KIR2DS1, we elected to code the variable as gene copy number as output by the KIR imputation software; however, we would not expect this to alter the ability to detect an association with birth weight. We additionally tested HLA-C in combination with a maternal KIR A vs B haplotype as this is representative of the inhibitory vs activating genotype. We would expect this to reflect a similar pattern of association as with the KIR2DS1 locus on its own, perhaps with some attenuation as KIR2DS1 may not be present on all individuals but similarly found no association in this variation of analysis. Some key differences to note between these two studies include the fact that we imputed both KIR and HLA types in our study, whereas Hiby et al. [19] were able to directly type mothers and babies in their smaller sample. Our imputation estimated KIR and HLA alleles with high accuracy, but there will be some level of uncertainty in the genotype calls made for individuals; any genotyping errors will bias results towards the null. We also removed birth weight outliers on both ends of the spectrum, keeping our sample to uncomplicated pregnancies without extreme birth weight babies. Hiby et al. [19], though also investigating uncomplicated pregnancies, investigated birth weights >5th centile with opportunity to include high birth weights if clinically determined to have no known medical cause, therefore including a greater range of birth weights than our study. Even so, in our included measures of birth weight covering normal pregnancy, we should expect to see the same previously observed patterns of association if the underlying biological mechanisms are acting as proposed. Given the null findings in our much larger sample, exclusion of outliers in our analyses alone is not sufficient to explain the lack of an association if a true effect of 250g higher birth weight in maternal KIR2DS1 carriers and fetal carriers of paternal HLA-C2 exists.

Previous work has been done to determine modelling methods that most accurately capture maternal-fetal genotype (MFG) interactions, such as that by Clark et al. 2016 and 2017, which developed the extended quantitative-MFG (QMFG) test, a linear mixed model that can apply familial multi-locus genotype data [53,54]. Their model was designed to address the issues of low power or incorrect conclusions obtained when using standard models that only consider offspring genotypes [53]. In the Clark et al. 2017 study, they used this model to the investigate the same relationship between maternal KIR2DS1, more fetal HLA-C2 than the mother, and birth weight as in Hiby et al. 2014, using the same sample of white European individuals (n ≈ 1,300 mother-child pairs) [54]. They expanded this replication by specifically testing an interaction between the loci and if there are additional independent effects of each locus. They found that the model that best fit this data and assessed these relationships, models the genetic effects of maternal KIR2DS1, more HLA-C2 in the fetus, and an interaction between them (denoted as Model 1 in their study). With this model, they found a significant KIR–HLA-C interaction effect on birth weight that explained ∼1% of the phenotypic variation in birth weight [54]. The model they used is essentially Model 4 in our study presented in Table 2 and Fig 2b: a linear mixed model testing the same genetic effects with both loci included as well as an interaction term. With respect to covariate adjustment, we adjusted our tested models for offspring sex and gestational age (except UKB) as they did, with the added benefit of adjustment for mother and child principal components in our models to guard against effects of population stratification. We have thus used a method previously determined to be the most appropriate to assess the maternal-fetal genetic relationships at these loci but were unable to replicate an effect in our analysis. It is important to reiterate that although Clark et al. 2017 were able to replicate an association between maternal KIR2DS1, greater HLA-C2 in the fetus, and increased birth weight as in the Hiby et al. 2014 study, they used the same small sample of mother-child pairs while our study increased sample size by approximately a factor of 10. Therefore, regardless of model similarities or differences, the impact of sample size on results must be considered.

The most likely explanation for our lack of evidence of a relationship between maternal KIR and fetal HLA-C on birth weight is that the previous association was a false-positive result, driven partly by the relatively small sample. It is well established that the lower a study’s power, the more likely a positive finding is to be false [55]. To our knowledge, Hiby et al. [19] also did not control for population substructure as we have done here with the inclusion of ancestry PCs. Unaccounted for differences in ancestry, even within a sample restricted to a single continent of origin, is a common reason for false-positive findings due to allele frequency differences between population subgroups among cases and controls [56]. The effect sizes observed previously [19] are not realistic for common complex traits and inconsistent with the effect sizes observed for common variants for birth weight and other traits that have been investigated over the years with GWAS [21,57,58]. Though our confidence intervals are wide, they are small enough to rule out the effect size found by Hiby et al. [19].

It is possible that the published associations of KIR and HLA-C2 are true with respect to pregnancy complications and the extremes of birth weight. Those pregnancies would be much more likely to be influenced by placental insufficiency or dysfunction which could be what these genes and their molecules truly influence rather than weight of the fetus per se. Though strides have been made with respect to GWAS and identification of genetic variants influencing pregnancy belonging to the mother, fetus, or shared by both [20,21,5961], there is still much work to be done in the exploration of maternal-fetal interaction and how genes work together to influence or cause birth and healthy aging outcomes. New and emerging large scale genetic studies identifying variants associated with phenotypes such as pre-eclampsia [62] and placental weight [63], may offer novel avenues of investigation in terms of testable instruments and sizeable population samples to draw from. It is also worth noting that a recent study able to partition maternal and fetal effects of classical HLA alleles on birth weight found only a nominal association (P < 0.05) of HLA-C on birth weight while certain HLA-A and HLA-B alleles showed a stronger association (P < 0.001) with birth weight after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing [61]. Evaluation of immunogenetic relationships would additionally benefit from the use of methods which could type individuals at these challenging loci even more accurately on a larger scale. The rise of high throughput whole genome sequencing technologies makes the availability of such data likely in coming years.

We are limited in our ability to generalize these findings to non-European populations as we did not use an ancestrally diverse set of individuals. Some additional limitations exist within the KIR imputation software itself and how it applies the data to be imputed. The estimated accuracy of the KIR loci is calculated based on the level of intersection between the reference panel and the input data [24]. It is highly dependent on how many of the 301 reference SNPs overlap with those in the study population sample, with 12 of these SNPs deemed “highly informative”. The accuracy figures in Table 4 are an estimate of how well each KIR type can expect to be imputed using SNP genotype data coming from the same population as the reference panel. The accuracy in actuality may be worse if the underlying ancestry of the population sample differs from that of the reference panel or if the genotype quality is poor. This is reflected in how well the distributions of the posterior probabilities of the most likely allele at each KIR locus align between the reference panel and the input dataset, for which our results largely showed very good concordance – an indicator that the KIR loci are imputed well, though less so for KIR A vs. B in the ALSPAC and BiB cohorts likely due to poor SNP coverage of the genotyping chip in this region (see S3S8 Figs). Adding further support for our study findings relative to our imputation quality, we performed a sensitivity analysis using simulations to examine the effect of varying imputation accuracy on the power to detect a main effect of maternal KIR2DS1 as well as an interaction between maternal KIR2DS1 and fetal HLA-C2 on offspring birth weight. The results indicated that we maintain very high power to detect main effects and interactions in our study, even with substantially reduced KIR imputation accuracy (simulated as low as 70%; see S1 Text). This can be attributed to having a sample size an order of magnitude larger than the original Hiby et al. study. Lastly, we sought to replicate initial published findings by Hiby et al. [19] tested in a population of uncomplicated pregnancies; we did not test these same associations in complicated pregnancies with a greater spectrum of extremes, e.g., with very low or high birth weights and pre-eclampsia, where associations could be more evident if they reflect the known underlying biological mechanisms.

Overall, though observational studies provide evidence for the role of maternal KIR and fetal HLA-C2 in pregnancy outcomes impacted by placental dysfunction, and by extension birth weight, we were unable to detect evidence of an association of these receptor-ligand pairs with offspring birth weight. Our findings here reinforce the importance of replication and use of the largest sample sizes available to maximize power, as not all observed genetic associations may be valid, even with strong biological plausibility. More research is needed to validate this relationship, or lack thereof, in more diverse populations and in complicated pregnancy cases in similarly robust sample sizes. Having successfully demonstrated the use of widely available SNP genotype data from large population studies to estimate individuals’ KIR and HLA genotypes, new statistical methods along with growing biobanks and consortia should be harnessed to better inform robust conclusions regarding maternal-fetal genetic interplay.

Supporting information

S1 Checklist. STROBE checklist for reporting of cross-sectional studies.

von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e296. PMID: 17941714.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012102.s001

(PDF)

S1 Text. Simulation: Estimating power to detect a main effect of KIR2DS1 and an interaction between maternal KIR2DS1 and fetal HLA-C2 on offspring birth weight with varying imputation accuracy.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012102.s002

(PDF)

S1 Fig. Meta-analysis omitting the UKB cohort (the only sample with birth weight not corrected for gestational age) to assess impact on the association between maternal KIR B alleles, fetal HLA-C, and birth weight.

Effects represent the estimated change in offspring birth weight (g) for each additional maternal KIR B allele (A) in the presence of fetal HLA-C2, (B) in the presence of more HLA-C2 alleles in the fetus relative to the mother, and (C) when fetal HLA-C2 is paternal in origin; total n = 7,437. UKB, UK Biobank; EFSOCH, Exeter Family Study of Childhood Health; HAPO, Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes study; ALSPAC, Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children; BiB, Born in Bradford.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012102.s003

(PDF)

S2 Fig. Meta-analysis omitting the UK Biobank (UKB) cohort (the only sample with birth weight not corrected for gestational age) to assess impact on the association between maternal KIR2DS1 alleles, fetal HLA-C, and birth weight.

Effects represent the estimated change in offspring birth weight (g) for each additional maternal KIR2DS1 allele (A) in the presence of fetal HLA-C2, (B) in the presence of more HLA-C2 alleles in the fetus relative to the mother, and (C) when fetal HLA-C2 is paternal in origin; total n = 7,437. UKB, UK Biobank; EFSOCH, Exeter Family Study of Childhood Health; HAPO, Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes study; ALSPAC, Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children; BiB, Born in Bradford.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012102.s004

(PDF)

S3 Fig. KIR imputation plots for UK Biobank (UKB) mother-offspring pairs (n = 8,498 at imputation stage).

(A) The estimated imputation accuracy achieved at each KIR locus. (B) The distribution of the posterior probabilities of the most likely alleles for each KIR locus where the distribution of the input dataset is shown in blue against the reference panel distribution shown in red.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012102.s005

(PDF)

S4 Fig. KIR imputation plots for the Exeter Family Study of Childhood Health (EFSOCH) mother-offspring pairs (n = 2,664 at imputation stage).

(A) The estimated imputation accuracy achieved at each KIR locus. (B) The distribution of the posterior probabilities of the most likely alleles for each KIR locus where the distribution of the input dataset is shown in blue against the reference panel distribution shown in red.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012102.s006

(PDF)

S5 Fig. KIR imputation plots for the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study mother-offspring pairs (n = 1,734 at imputation stage).

(A) The estimated imputation accuracy achieved at each KIR locus. (B) The distribution of the posterior probabilities of the most likely alleles for each KIR locus where the distribution of the input dataset is shown in blue against the reference panel distribution shown in red.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012102.s007

(PDF)

S6 Fig. KIR imputation plots for the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) mother-offspring pairs (n = 17,827 at imputation stage).

(A) The estimated imputation accuracy achieved at each KIR locus. (B) The distribution of the posterior probabilities of the most likely alleles for each KIR locus where the distribution of the input dataset is shown in blue against the reference panel distribution shown in red.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012102.s008

(PDF)

S7 Fig. KIR imputation plots for the Born in Bradford (BiB) Core Exome mother-offspring pairs (n = 5,709 at imputation stage).

(A) The estimated imputation accuracy achieved at each KIR locus. (B) The distribution of the posterior probabilities of the most likely alleles for each KIR locus where the distribution of the input dataset is shown in blue against the reference panel distribution shown in red.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012102.s009

(PDF)

S8 Fig. KIR imputation plots for the Born in Bradford (BiB) Global Screening Array mother-offspring pairs (n = 1,901 at imputation stage).

(A) The estimated imputation accuracy achieved at each KIR locus. (B) The distribution of the posterior probabilities of the most likely alleles for each KIR locus where the distribution of the input dataset is shown in blue against the reference panel distribution shown in red.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012102.s010

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under application number 53641.

This study represents independent research supported by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Exeter Clinical Research Facility. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social care.

The Exeter Family Study of Childhood Health (EFSOCH) was supported by South West NHS Research and Development, Exeter NHS Research and Development, the Darlington Trust and the Peninsula NIHR Clinical Research Facility at the University of Exeter. The opinions given in this paper do not necessarily represent those of NIHR, the NHS or the Department of Health. We would like to acknowledge Andrew Hattersley as the principal investigator, and Bea Knight for her contribution to data collection, of the EFSOCH study.

We are extremely grateful to all the families who took part in this study, the midwives for their help in recruiting them, and the whole ALSPAC team, which includes interviewers, computer and laboratory technicians, clerical workers, research scientists, volunteers, managers, receptionists and nurses. This publication is the work of the authors and C.S.D and R.M.F will serve as guarantors for the contents of this paper.

Born in Bradford is only possible because of the enthusiasm and commitment of the children and parents in BiB. We are grateful to all the participants, health professionals, schools and researchers who have made Born in Bradford happen.

This project utilised high-performance computing funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Research Infrastructure Initiative (award number MR/M008924/1).

References

  1. 1. Karn MN, Penrose LS. Birth weight and gestation time in relation to maternal age, parity and infant survival. Ann Eugen. 1951;16(2):147–64. pmid:14885877
  2. 2. Contag S, Brown C, Crimmins S, Goetzinger K. Influence of birthweight on the prospective stillbirth risk in the third trimester: a cross-sectional cohort study. AJP Rep. 2016;6(3):e287-98. pmid:27540493
  3. 3. Backes CH, Markham K, Moorehead P, Cordero L, Nankervis CA, Giannone PJ. Maternal preeclampsia and neonatal outcomes. J Pregnancy. 2011;2011:214365. pmid:21547086
  4. 4. Metrustry SJ, Karhunen V, Edwards MH, Menni C, Geisendorfer T, Huber A, et al. Metabolomic signatures of low birthweight: pathways to insulin resistance and oxidative stress. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0194316. pmid:29566009
  5. 5. Boney CM, Verma A, Tucker R, Vohr BR. Metabolic syndrome in childhood: association with birth weight, maternal obesity, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Pediatrics. 2005;115(3):e290-6. pmid:15741354
  6. 6. Weissmann-Brenner A, Simchen MJ, Zilberberg E, Kalter A, Weisz B, Achiron R, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of large for gestational age pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(7):844–9. pmid:22471810
  7. 7. Verma S, King A, Loke YW. Expression of killer cell inhibitory receptors on human uterine natural killer cells. Eur J Immunol. 1997;27(4):979–83. pmid:9130653
  8. 8. Apps R, Murphy SP, Fernando R, Gardner L, Ahad T, Moffett A. Human leucocyte antigen (HLA) expression of primary trophoblast cells and placental cell lines, determined using single antigen beads to characterize allotype specificities of anti-HLA antibodies. Immunology. 2009;127(1):26–39. pmid:19368562
  9. 9. Choo SY. The HLA system: genetics, immunology, clinical testing, and clinical implications. Yonsei Med J. 2007;48(1):11–23. pmid:17326240
  10. 10. Biassoni R, Falco M, Cambiaggi A, Costa P, Verdiani S, Pende D, et al. Amino acid substitutions can influence the natural killer (NK)-mediated recognition of HLA-C molecules. Role of serine-77 and lysine-80 in the target cell protection from lysis mediated by “group 2” or “group 1” NK clones. J Exp Med. 1995;182(2):605–9. pmid:7629517
  11. 11. Faridi RM, Agrawal S. Killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) and HLA-C allorecognition patterns implicative of dominant activation of natural killer cells contribute to recurrent miscarriages. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(2):491–7. pmid:21159685
  12. 12. Xiong S, Sharkey AM, Kennedy PR, Gardner L, Farrell LE, Chazara O, et al. Maternal uterine NK cell-activating receptor KIR2DS1 enhances placentation. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(10):4264–72. pmid:24091323
  13. 13. Kennedy PR, Chazara O, Gardner L, Ivarsson MA, Farrell LE, Xiong S, et al. Activating KIR2DS4 Is expressed by uterine NK cells and contributes to successful pregnancy. J Immunol. 2016;197(11):4292–300. pmid:27815424
  14. 14. Hiby SE, Apps R, Sharkey AM, Farrell LE, Gardner L, Mulder A, et al. Maternal activating KIRs protect against human reproductive failure mediated by fetal HLA-C2. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(11):4102–10. pmid:20972337
  15. 15. Kieckbusch J, Gaynor LM, Moffett A, Colucci F. MHC-dependent inhibition of uterine NK cells impedes fetal growth and decidual vascular remodelling. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3359. pmid:24577131
  16. 16. Jiang W, Johnson C, Jayaraman J, Simecek N, Noble J, Moffatt MF, et al. Copy number variation leads to considerable diversity for B but not A haplotypes of the human KIR genes encoding NK cell receptors. Genome Res. 2012;22(10):1845–54. pmid:22948769
  17. 17. Moffett A, Hiby SE, Sharkey AM. The role of the maternal immune system in the regulation of human birthweight. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370(1663):20140071. pmid:25602075
  18. 18. Middleton D, Gonzelez F. The extensive polymorphism of KIR genes. Immunology. 2010;129(1):8–19. pmid:20028428
  19. 19. Hiby SE, Apps R, Chazara O, Farrell LE, Magnus P, Trogstad L, et al. Maternal KIR in combination with paternal HLA-C2 regulate human birth weight. J Immunol. 2014;192(11):5069–73. pmid:24778445
  20. 20. Warrington NM, Beaumont RN, Horikoshi M, Day FR, Helgeland Ø, Laurin C, et al. Maternal and fetal genetic effects on birth weight and their relevance to cardio-metabolic risk factors. Nat Genet. 2019;51(5):804–14. pmid:31043758
  21. 21. Juliusdottir T, Steinthorsdottir V, Stefansdottir L, Sveinbjornsson G, Ivarsdottir EV, Thorolfsdottir RB, et al. Distinction between the effects of parental and fetal genomes on fetal growth. Nat Genet. 2021;53(8):1135–42. pmid:34282336
  22. 22. Burton GJ, Woods AW, Jauniaux E, Kingdom JCP. Rheological and physiological consequences of conversion of the maternal spiral arteries for uteroplacental blood flow during human pregnancy. Placenta. 2009;30(6):473–82. pmid:19375795
  23. 23. Velicky P, Knöfler M, Pollheimer J. Function and control of human invasive trophoblast subtypes: intrinsic vs. maternal control. Cell Adh Migr. 2016;10(1–2):154–62. pmid:26418186
  24. 24. Vukcevic D, Traherne JA, Næss S, Ellinghaus E, Kamatani Y, Dilthey A, et al. Imputation of KIR types from SNP variation data. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;97(4):593–607. pmid:26430804
  25. 25. Dilthey A, Leslie S, Moutsianas L, Shen J, Cox C, Nelson MR, et al. Multi-population classical HLA type imputation. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(2):e1002877. pmid:23459081
  26. 26. Jia X, Han B, Onengut-Gumuscu S, Chen W-M, Concannon PJ, Rich SS, et al. Imputing amino acid polymorphisms in human leukocyte antigens. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e64683. pmid:23762245
  27. 27. Luo Y, Kanai M, Choi W, Li X, Sakaue S, Yamamoto K, et al. A high-resolution HLA reference panel capturing global population diversity enables multi-ancestry fine-mapping in HIV host response. Nat Genet. 2021;53(10):1504–16. pmid:34611364
  28. 28. Sudlow C, Gallacher J, Allen N, Beral V, Burton P, Danesh J, et al. UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med. 2015;12(3):e1001779. pmid:25826379
  29. 29. Bycroft C, Freeman C, Petkova D, Band G, Elliott LT, Sharp K, et al. The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature. 2018;562(7726):203–9. pmid:30305743
  30. 30. Galinsky KJ, Bhatia G, Loh P-R, Georgiev S, Mukherjee S, Patterson NJ, et al. Fast principal-component analysis reveals convergent evolution of ADH1B in Europe and East Asia. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98(3):456–72. pmid:26924531
  31. 31. Manichaikul A, Mychaleckyj JC, Rich SS, Daly K, Sale M, Chen W-M. Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(22):2867–73. pmid:20926424
  32. 32. McCarthy S, Das S, Kretzschmar W, Delaneau O, Wood AR, Teumer A, et al. A reference panel of 64,976 haplotypes for genotype imputation. Nat Genet. 2016;48(10):1279–83. pmid:27548312
  33. 33. Das S, Forer L, Schönherr S, Sidore C, Locke AE, Kwong A, et al. Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods. Nat Genet. 2016;48(10):1284–7. pmid:27571263
  34. 34. Fuchsberger C, Abecasis GR, Hinds DA. minimac2: faster genotype imputation. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(5):782–4. pmid:25338720
  35. 35. Loh P-R, Danecek P, Palamara PF, Fuchsberger C, A Reshef Y, K Finucane H, et al. Reference-based phasing using the Haplotype Reference Consortium panel. Nat Genet. 2016;48(11):1443–8. pmid:27694958
  36. 36. Knight B, Shields BM, Hattersley AT. The Exeter Family Study of Childhood Health (EFSOCH): study protocol and methodology. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006;20(2):172–9. pmid:16466435
  37. 37. Abraham G, Qiu Y, Inouye M. FlashPCA2: principal component analysis of Biobank-scale genotype datasets. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(17):2776–8. pmid:28475694
  38. 38. Taliun D, Harris DN, Kessler MD, Carlson J, Szpiech ZA, Torres R. Sequencing of 53,831 diverse genomes from the NHLBI TOPMed Program. Nature. 2021;590(7845):290–9.
  39. 39. The HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(19):1991–2002.
  40. 40. HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. The Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;78(1):69–77. pmid:12113977
  41. 41. Urbanek M, Hayes MG, Armstrong LL, Morrison J, Lowe LP, Badon SE, et al. The chromosome 3q25 genomic region is associated with measures of adiposity in newborns in a multi-ethnic genome-wide association study. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22(17):3583–96. pmid:23575227
  42. 42. Abraham G, Inouye M. Fast principal component analysis of large-scale genome-wide data. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e93766. pmid:24718290
  43. 43. Boyd A, Golding J, Macleod J, Lawlor DA, Fraser A, Henderson J, et al. Cohort Profile: the ’children of the 90s’--the index offspring of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(1):111–27. pmid:22507743
  44. 44. Fraser A, Macdonald-Wallis C, Tilling K, Boyd A, Golding J, Davey Smith G, et al. Cohort profile: the Avon longitudinal study of parents and children: ALSPAC mothers cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(1):97–110. pmid:22507742
  45. 45. Thompson WD, Beaumont RN, Kuang A, Warrington NM, Ji Y, Tyrrell J, et al. Higher maternal adiposity reduces offspring birthweight if associated with a metabolically favourable profile. Diabetologia. 2021;64(12):2790–802. pmid:34542646
  46. 46. Wright J, Small N, Raynor P, Tuffnell D, Bhopal R, Cameron N, et al. Cohort Profile: the Born in Bradford multi-ethnic family cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(4):978–91. pmid:23064411
  47. 47. McEachan RRC, Santorelli G, Watmuff A, Mason D, Barber SE, Bingham DD, et al. Cohort Profile Update: Born in Bradford. Int J Epidemiol. 2024;53(2).
  48. 48. The Born in Bradford Platform [Internet]. [cited 2023 Nov 21]. Available from: https://borninbradford.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/BiB_Data_Summary_slides.pdf
  49. 49. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45:5–32.
  50. 50. Purcell S, Chang C. PLINK.
  51. 51. Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LCAM, Vattikuti S, Purcell SM, Lee JJ. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience. 2015;4(1):1–16.
  52. 52. Nariai N, Kojima K, Saito S, Mimori T, Sato Y, Kawai Y, et al. HLA-VBSeq: accurate HLA typing at full resolution from whole-genome sequencing data. BMC Genomics. 2015;16 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S7. pmid:25708870
  53. 53. Clark MM, Blangero J, Dyer TD, Sobel EM, Sinsheimer JS. The quantitative-MFG test: a linear mixed effect model to detect maternal-offspring gene interactions. Ann Hum Genet. 2016;80(1):63–80. pmid:26567478
  54. 54. Clark MM, Chazara O, Sobel EM, Gjessing HK, Magnus P, Moffett A. Human birth weight and reproductive immunology: testing for interactions between maternal and offspring KIR and HLA-C genes. Hum Hered. 2017;81(4):181–93.
  55. 55. Wacholder S, Chanock S, Garcia-Closas M, El Ghormli L, Rothman N. Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: an approach for molecular epidemiology studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(6):434–42. pmid:15026468
  56. 56. Tian C, Gregersen PK, Seldin MF. Accounting for ancestry: population substructure and genome-wide association studies. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17(R2):R143–50. pmid:18852203
  57. 57. Lango Allen H, Estrada K, Lettre G, Berndt SI, Weedon MN, Rivadeneira F, et al. Hundreds of variants clustered in genomic loci and biological pathways affect human height. Nature. 2010;467(7317):832–8. pmid:20881960
  58. 58. Suzuki K, Hatzikotoulas K, Southam L, Taylor HJ, Yin X, Lorenz KM, et al. Genetic drivers of heterogeneity in type 2 diabetes pathophysiology. Nature. 2024;627(8003):347–57. pmid:38374256
  59. 59. Warrington NM, Freathy RM, Neale MC, Evans DM. Using structural equation modelling to jointly estimate maternal and fetal effects on birthweight in the UK Biobank. Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47(4):1229–41. pmid:29447406
  60. 60. Moen G-H, Hemani G, Warrington NM, Evans DM. Calculating power to detect maternal and offspring genetic effects in genetic association studies. Behav Genet. 2019;49(3):327–39. pmid:30600410
  61. 61. Wang G, Warrington NM, Evans DM. Partitioning genetic effects on birthweight at classical human leukocyte antigen loci into maternal and fetal components, using structural equation modelling. Int J Epidemiol. 2024;53(1):dyad142. pmid:37831898
  62. 62. Tyrmi JS, Kaartokallio T, Lokki AI, Jääskeläinen T, Kortelainen E, Ruotsalainen S, et al. Genetic risk factors associated with preeclampsia and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. JAMA Cardiol. 2023;8(7):674–83. pmid:37285119
  63. 63. Beaumont RN, Flatley C, Vaudel M, Wu X, Chen J, Moen G-H, et al. Genome-wide association study of placental weight identifies distinct and shared genetic influences between placental and fetal growth. Nat Genet. 2023;55(11):1807–19. pmid:37798380