Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Mitogen-activated protein kinase 6 negatively regulates secondary wall biosynthesis by modulating MYB46 protein stability in Arabidopsis thaliana

  • Jong Hee Im,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration, Jeonju, Republic of Korea

  • Jae-Heung Ko ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    jhko@khu.ac.kr (J-HK); hanky@msu.edu (K-HH)

    Affiliation Department of Plant & Environmental New Resources, College of Life Science and Graduate School of Biotechnology, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea

  • Won-Chan Kim,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation School of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea

  • Brent Crain,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America

  • Daniel Keathley,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America

  • Kyung-Hwan Han

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    jhko@khu.ac.kr (J-HK); hanky@msu.edu (K-HH)

    Affiliations Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America, Department of Forestry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America

Abstract

The R2R3-MYB transcription factor MYB46 functions as a master switch for secondary cell wall biosynthesis, ensuring the exquisite expression of the secondary wall biosynthetic genes in the tissues where secondary walls are critical for growth and development. At the same time, suppression of its function is needed when/where formation of secondary walls is not desirable. Little is known about how this opposing control of secondary cell wall formation is achieved. We used both transient and transgenic expression of MYB46 and mitogen-activated protein kinase 6 (MPK6) to investigate the molecular mechanism of the post-translational regulation of MYB46. We show that MYB46 is phosphorylated by MPK6, leading to site specific phosphorylation-dependent degradation of MYB46 by the ubiquitin-mediated proteasome pathway. In addition, the MPK6-mediated MYB46 phosphorylation was found to regulate in planta secondary wall forming function of MYB46. Furthermore, we provide experimental evidences that MYB83, a paralog of MYB46, is not regulated by MPK6. The coupling of MPK signaling to MYB46 function provides insights into the tissue- and/or condition-specific activity of MYB46 for secondary wall biosynthesis.

Author summary

Secondary cell walls are critical for plant growth and of economic importance to humans as fiber, pulp for paper, and as a renewable source of energy. A master switch for secondary wall biosynthesis, MYB46, ensures the exquisite expression of the biosynthetic genes in the tissues where secondary walls are critical. However, suppression of secondary wall formation is needed during impermanent cessation of vegetative growth triggered by environmental stresses. Although the expression of MYB46 is upregulated by abiotic stresses, secondary wall formation may not occur. How is this opposing control achieved? The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MPK) cascade is among the most conserved signal transduction systems in eukaryotes and plays a crucial role in the regulation of biochemical and physiological changes associated with environmental stimuli and phytohormones. In this report, we show that MYB46 is negatively regulated by MPK6 during salt stress, providing a novel insight into a mechanism by which plants incorporate environmental signals into differential regulation of secondary wall biosynthesis.

Introduction

Secondary cell walls, located between the plasma membrane and primary cell wall, are a defining feature of xylem fibers and vessels, providing mechanical support for plants and serving as a conduit for long-distance transport of water and solutes. They constitute the majority of plant biomass and are of economic importance to humans as fiber, animal feed, pulp for manufacture of paper, and as an environmentally desirable, cost-effective, renewable source of energy. The biosynthesis of secondary walls occurs in a highly-coordinated manner by successive deposition of cellulose fibrils, hemicelluloses and lignin upon cessation of cell growth [13]. This process requires a coordinated transcriptional activation of the biosynthetic genes for the components, suggesting the existence of one or more central transcriptional regulators.

The plant-specific R2R3-MYB transcription factor MYB46 is a master switch for the secondary wall biosynthetic program in Arabidopsis thaliana, and ensures the exquisite expression of the secondary wall biosynthetic genes in the secondary wall forming tissues [38]. Proper function of MYB46 is critical for secondary wall formation, but the coordinated interplay of this signal with environmental stimuli poses interesting questions, particularly when cells are exposed to biotic or abiotic stresses that induce the expression of the MYB46 gene [9] while suppression of secondary wall formation is necessary in those affected tissues. For example, upon exposure to abiotic stresses, growth ceases earlier in the aerial parts than in the root system, which allows the stressed plants to reallocate resources to root growth [10], requiring concomitant suppression of MYB46 activity in the aerial portions along with induction of the response in the root system. How does the plant that is undergoing stress-induced upregulation of MYB46 transcription manage to suppress MYB46 function in cells where secondary wall formation is not needed? How does the plant incorporate extracellular (e.g., environmental, positional) signals into the condition-specific activity of MYB46? Little is known about the mechanism regulating this condition-specific activity of MYB46.

The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MPK) cascade is among the most conserved signal transduction systems in eukaryotes and plays a crucial role in the regulation of biochemical and physiological changes associated with environmental stimuli and phytohormones. Specific MPKs are activated in response to extracellular stimuli. Arabidopsis MPK6 is activated by abiotic stresses, such as salt, cold, wounding and hyper-osmotic stresses [11, 12]. In Arabidopsis, there are approximately 570 MPK phosphorylation substrates. Transcription factors, involved in the regulation of development, defense, and stress responses, represent the largest group of MPK substrates [13]. While the importance of the MPK signal cascade in plant growth and development is well-known, no single MPK-mediated regulation has been described in secondary wall biosynthesis.

In this report, we present that MYB46 is post-translationally regulated by MPK6, which might function as an efficient means to manage acute responses to salt stress.

Results

MPK6 phosphorylates MYB46 protein with a direct interaction

Eukaryotic Linear Motif (ELM; http://elm.eu.org) prediction tool showed that MYB46 contains a putative mitogen-activated protein kinase (MPK)-docking domain (2RKPEVAI8) near the N-terminal and two potential phosphorylation target sites (S138 and T199) (Fig 1A). In MPK signaling, docking domains act as substrate determinants, recruiting kinases to the correct substrates and thereby enhancing their fidelity and efficiency of action [14]. In addition to the docking domains, phosphorylation target sites (i.e., phosphoacceptor motifs) on substrates contribute to MPK specificity. This result suggests that MYB46 may be subject to post-translational regulation by MPK.

thumbnail
Fig 1. MPK6 phosphorylates MYB46 protein with a direct interaction.

(A) Schematic drawing of MPK docking domain and phosphorylation target sites in MYB46 predicted by Eukaryotic Linear Motif (http://elm.eu.org/). (B) Yeast two hybrid assay showing interaction between MYB46 and CAMPK6 proteins. A standard spot assay was carried out using the designated selective media condition (-Leu, -Trp, -His in the presence of 1 mM 3AT). (C) Co-immunoprecipition of MYB46 and CAMPK6. GFP conjugated MYB46 (MYB46-GFP) and HA conjugated CAMPK6 (CAMPK6-HA) were co-expressed in AMPs with MG132 treatment. After expression, immunoprecipitation was carried out with anti-HA antibody and then protein blot analysis was carried out with anti-GFP antibody. (D) Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) of MYB46 and CAMPK6. BiFC was carried out with designated combinations in AMPs with MG132 treatment. (E) Immunocomplex kinase assay of MYB46 and CAMPK6. MYB46-GFP and CAMPK6-HA were expressed in AMPs. After the expression, immunoprecipitation was carried out with anti-HA antibody and anti-GFP antibody, then in vitro kinase assay was carried out.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009510.g001

To test this hypothesis, we first investigated whether MYB46 interacts with MPKs known to be associated with salt stress responses. We used MPK3 and 6, which has been shown to be activated by salt stress [15, 16]. Since MPK3 did not regulate MYB46 transcriptional activity and protein stability (S1 Fig), we focused on MPK6. Yeast 2-hybrid (Y2H) experiments using MYB46 as bait and a constitutively active form of MPK6 (i.e., MPK6 D218G, E222A; CAMPK6, hereafter) as a prey showed that MYB46 interacts with CAMPK6 (Fig 1B). In this Y2H experiment, the interaction of MYC2 and CAMPK6 was included as a positive control (Fig 1B) [17]. To confirm the Y2H results, we performed a co-immunoprecipitation assay using the Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplast transient expression system (AMPs)[18]. Both MYB46-GFP and CAMPK6-HA fusion constructs were transiently co-expressed in AMPs in the presence of the proteasome inhibitor MG132. CAMPK6 interacting protein was immunoprecipitated using anti-HA antibody followed by protein blot analysis with anti-GFP antibody. The result suggested a direct interaction of these two proteins (Fig 1C). In addition, we carried out BiFC experiments in AMPs. As shown in Fig 1D, CAMPK6 interacted with MYB46.

We then investigated whether the interaction of MYB46 and CAMPK6 resulted in MYB46 phosphorylation. Immunocomplex kinase assay with CAMPK6 showed that CAMPK6 phosphorylates MYB46 protein (Fig 1E).

MYB46 protein stability is negatively regulated by CAMPK6

To examine the stability of MYB46 protein in the presence of CAMPK6, we expressed MYB46-GFP fusion construct (35S::MYB46-GFP) in AMPs with or without CAMPK6-YFP fusion construct (35S::CAMPK6-YFP). GFP signal was detected when MYB46-GFP was expressed alone, but the signal disappeared with CAMPK6-YFP co-expression (Fig 2A), suggesting that MYB46 might be degraded when co-expressed with CAMPK6. This observation was confirmed by protein blot analysis of MYB46-GFP fusion proteins expressed in AMPs with or without CAMPK6-HA. MYB46 protein level was not much changed with co-expression of MPK6, a wild-type MPK6, but disappeared in the presence of CAMPK6 (Fig 2B). However, MYB46 protein degradation was not observed with addition of proteasome inhibitor MG132 (Fig 2C), suggesting that CAMPK6 may degrade MYB46 protein through the ubiquitin-mediated proteasome pathway [19]. This CAMPK6-mediated degradation of MYB46 was further confirmed in planta using transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing MYB46 with CAMPK6 together (i.e., MYB46OX/CAMPK6OX) or only MYB46 (i.e., MYB46OX) or only CAMPK6 (i.e., CAMPK6OX) (Fig 2D). Protein blot analysis using anti-MYB46 antibody showed that the level of MYB46 protein was decreased in the MYB46OX/CAMPK6OX plants (Fig 2D).

thumbnail
Fig 2. MYB46 protein stability is negatively regulated by CAMPK6.

(A) MYB46-GFP fusion construct was expressed in AMPs with or without CAMPK6-YFP. Image was taken after incubation for 10-hr by fluorescence microscopy. (B) Protein blot analysis of MYB46. MYB46-GFP was expressed in AMPs with or without MPK6-HA or CAMPK6-HA for 10-hr. After expression, the cells were harvested for protein blot analysis with anti-HA antibody or anti-GFP antibody. (C) Protein blot analysis of MYB46 with or without MG132. MYB46-GFP was expressed in AMPs with or without CAMPK6-HA. For MG132 treatment, 1 ul of 5 mM of MG132 was added to 1 ml reaction and incubated for an additional 9-hr. The harvested cells were used for protein blot analysis with anti-GFP antibody or anti-HA antibody. (D) Protein blot analysis of MYB46. Using total protein extracted from transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing MYB46 (MYB46OX), CAMPK6 (CAMPK6OX), or both (MYB46OX/CAMPK6OX), MYB46 protein was detected with anti-MYB46 antibody.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009510.g002

MPK6 negatively regulates MYB46 function in planta

We expected that this MPK6-mediated degradation would negatively affect the function of MYB46 in planta. To test this hypothesis, we performed a transient transcription activation assay (TAA) using promoter sequences of known direct targets of MYB46 (e.g., CESA4, CESA7, CESA8, CCoAOMT, and PAL4 to drive a GUS reporter gene as described previously [6]. When co-expressed with 35S promoter-driven MYB46 (35S::MYB46), GUS activities of the reporter constructs were dramatically increased (Fig 3A). However, the increased GUS activities were suppressed when co-expressed with CAMPK6 (35S::CAMPK6), suggesting CAMPK6 negatively regulates MYB46 activity.

thumbnail
Fig 3. MPK6 negatively regulates MYB46 function in planta.

(A) Promoter activities of MYB46 target genes were decreased by CAMPK6 co-expression. The promoter::GUS fusion constructs were expressed in AMPs with MYB46 or MYB46 and CAMPK6. NAN was used as expression control. (B) Phenotypic analysis of 3-week-old Col-0, MYB46OX, CAMPK6OX or MYB46OX/CAMPK6OX (upper panel; scale bar, 1 cm). Phloroglucinol-HCl (i.e., lignin) staining of stems of 8-weeks-old plants (lower panel; scale bar, 100 μm). Red arrowheads indicate ectopic lignifications. (C) Expression of MYB46 and two direct targets (4CL1 and PAL4) of MYB46. Relative expression of genes was measured by Real-Time qPCR analysis using 3-week-old wild-type (Col-0) or transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing MYB46 (MYB46OX), CAMPK6 (CAMPK6OX) or both (MYB46OX/CAMPK6OX). *** indicates statistically significant (p ≤ 0.01, t-test, n = 3). (D) DEX inducible expression of CAMPK6 in the background of myb83 mutant plants. Scale bar, 1 cm. (E) Expression of MYB46 target genes in DEX::CAMPK6/myb83 plants with (black bars) or without (white bars) DEX treatment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009510.g003

Upward leaf curling and ectopic secondary wall thickening, a typical phenotypes of constitutive MYB46 overexpression plants [5], were clearly reproduced in the MYB46OX plants (Fig 3B). However, these phenotypes were reverted back to wild type in the MYB46OX/CAMPK6OX plants (Fig 3B). Upward leaf curling (Fig 3B, upper panel) and ectopic lignin staining (Fig 3B, lower panel) in MYB46OX were disappeared in the MYB46OX/CAMPK6OX plants (Fig 3B).

As expected, expression of two direct target genes of MYB46, 4CL1 and PAL4, was increased in the MYB46OX plants compared to Col-0 plants (Fig 3C). However, even though MYB46 gene expression in MYB46OX/CAMPK6OX plants was similar to that in MYB46OX plants, expression of 4CL1 and PAL4 were reduced significantly in the MYB46OX/CAMPK6OX plants, further suggesting CAMPK6 negatively regulates MYB46 activity (Fig 3C).

To further confirm the MPK6-mediated negative regulation of MYB46 function, we created transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing dexamethasone (DEX)-inducible CAMPK6 in the myb83 mutant background (DEX::CAMPK6/myb83); MYB83 is a paralog of MYB46 in Arabidopsis [20]. With DEX treatment, the DEX::CAMPK6/myb83 plants exhibited stunted growth (Fig 3D), which is a typical phenotype of myb46/myb83 double knockout mutants [20]. This observation suggests that CAMPK6 regulates MYB46 protein function, negatively. Accordingly, the expressions of MYB46 target genes were decreased with DEX treatment in the DEX::CAMPK6/myb83 plants (Fig 3E). Taken together, we suggest that MPK6-mediated phosphorylation negatively regulates MYB46 protein activity in planta.

Functional significance of MPK6 phosphorylation target sites of MYB46

MYB46 has two putative MPK phosphorylation sites, S138 and T199 (Fig 1A). To test the functional significance of the phosphorylation sites, we point-mutated MYB46 to make a single non-phosphorable form (either S138R or T199R) or double non-phosphorable form (S138R/T199R) [21, 22]. We first assessed whether those mutant proteins were subject to MPK6-mediated degradation by using protein blot analysis. Each of the single mutant proteins, MYB46S138R or MYB46T199R, were degraded when co-expressed with CAMPK6 in AMPs, while the double mutant protein MYB46S138/T199R was not (Fig 4A), suggesting that a single phosphorylation is sufficient for MYB46 protein degradation by CAMPK6. This was further confirmed by co-expressing CAMPK6-YFP and MYB46-GFP fusion proteins in AMPs. The GFP signal was detected when wild-type MYB46 (35S::MYB46 wt-GFP) or mutant MYB46 (35S::MYB46S138R-GFP, 35S::MYB46T199R-GFP, or 35S::MYB46S138R/T199R-GFP) was expressed without CAMPK6 (35S::CAMPK6-YFP) co-expression. However, the GFP signal disappeared when MYB46-GFP, MYB46S138R-GFP, or MYB46T199R-GFP was co-expressed with CAMPK6-YFP, respectively (Fig 4B). Consistent with the protein blot analysis result (Fig 4A), the GFP signal was still detected from MYB46S138R/T199R-GFP (35S::MYB46S138R/T199R-GFP) even in the presence of CAMPK6-YFP (Fig 4B). Taken together, we suggest that phosphorylation at either one of the target sites is sufficient for MPK6-mediated degradation of MYB46 protein.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Functional significance of MPK6 phosphorylation target sites of MYB46.

(A) Protein blot analysis of MYB46 and its non-phosphorable mutants. The MYB46-GFP and its non-phosphorable mutants (MYB46S138R-GFP, MYB46T199R-GFP, or MYB46S138R/T199R-GFP) were expressed with or without CAMPK6-HA in AMPs and incubated for 10-hr. Protein blot analysis was carried out with anti-GFP antibody for MYB46 and anti-HA antibody for CAMPK6. (B) MYB46-GFP and its non-phosphorable mutants were expressed with CAMPK6-YFP. After 10-hr incubation, image was taken by fluorescence microscopy. (C) From AMPs, protein blot analysis of MYB46-HA and its phospho-mimics (MYB46S138E or MYB46T199D) with or without proteasome inhibitor MG132. The protein blot analysis was carried out with anti-HA antibody.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009510.g004

The functional significance of the two phosphorylation sites was further tested by introducing phosphomimic mutations into the two sites (either MYB46S138E or MYB46T199D). Phosphomimic mutation at either one of the target sites resulted in degradation of MYB46 protein (Figs 4C and S2), confirming that phosphorylation of the two target sites leads to degradation of MYB46. Accordingly, the expression of MYB46 target genes was significantly reduced in the phosphomimic mutant line (MYB46S138E) when compared to MYB46OX line, despite that the expression of MYB46 itself was not different (S2B Fig). However, the degradation was not observed in the presence of proteasome inhibitor MG132 (Fig 4C). In addition, substitution of lysine with arginine at a putative ubiquitination site of MYB46 (K156R) prevented degradation of the mutant MYB46 protein (S3 Fig), further confirming that this phosphorylation-dependent degradation of MYB46 is through the ubiquitin-mediated proteasome pathway.

Phosphorylation sites of MYB46 is important for in planta MYB46 activity

To test whether the site specific phosphorylation of MYB46 affects in planta MYB46 activity, first, we performed a TAA by co-expressing MYB46 mutant constructs with the GUS reporter gene driven by the CESA8 promoter (pCESA8::GUS), with or without CAMPK6 in AMPs. As expected, GUS activities of pCESA8 were increased in wild-type (MYB46wt) and all the non-phosphorable MYB46 mutant constructs (MYB46S138R, MYB46T199R, and MYB46S138R/T199R). However, the increased GUS activities were compromised, significantly when co-expressed with CAMPK6 (35S::CAMPK6) except in the double MYB46 mutants (MYB46S138R/T199R), suggesting that CAMPK6-mediated site specific phosphorylation of MYB46 affects MYB46 activity (Fig 5A). In addition, phosphomimic mutation at either one of the two phosphorylation sites resulted in a significant reduction in MYB46 activity (Fig 5B).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Phosphorylation sites of MYB46 is important for in planta MYB46 activity.

(A) pCESA8::GUS was expressed with MYB46 or its non-phosphorable mutants (MYB46S138R, MYB46T199R, or MYB46S138R/T199R) with or without CAMPK6 in AMPs. After 6-hr incubation, the cells were harvested for measurement of GUS activity. NAN was used as expression control. (B) pCESA8::GUS was expressed in AMPs with MYB46 or its phospho-mimic mutants (MYB46S138E or MYB46T199D). After 6-hr incubation, GUS activity was measured and NAN was used as expression control. (C) Lignin staining of stem sections. Phloroglucinol-HCl staining was performed on the rosette-level stem sections of 8-week-old Col-0 plants, transgenic plants overexpressing MYB46 (MYB46OX), MYB46 and CAMPK6 (MYB46OX/CAMPK6OX), non-phosphorable mutant (MYB46S138R/ T199ROX, T1), or MYB46S138R/T199R and CAMPK6 (MYB46S138R/T199ROX/CAMPK6OX, T1). Red arrowheads indicate ectopic lignifications. Scale bar, 100 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009510.g005

To further confirm these findings, we produced transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing MYB46wt or MYB46S138R/T199R with or without CAMPK6. The transgenic plants overexpressing wild-type MYB46 (35S::MYB46wt) or with double non-phosphorable mutations (35S::MYB46S138R/T199R) showed ectopic lignification in the epidermal cells (a typical phenotype of constitutive MYB46 overexpression) without CAMPK6 co-expression. However, that ectopic lignification disappeared in the 35S::MYB46wt transgenic plants co-expressing CAMPK6 (i.e., MYB46OX/CAMPK6OX), while the double non-phosphorable mutants co-expressing CAMPK6 (i.e., MYB46 S138R/T199ROX/CAMPK6OX) was showed the ectopic lignification (Figs 5C and S4). These observations further suggest that MPK6 negatively regulates MYB46 function in planta through site specific phosphorylation-dependent degradation of MYB46.

MYB83, a paralog of MYB46, is not regulated by MPK6

Based on the ELM prediction, MYB83 has two putative phosphorylation target sites, S147 and S195 but no MPK docking domain, which is unlike to MYB46 (Fig 6A). Thus, we hypothesized that MYB83 is not a substrate for MPK6. We tested this hypothesis by investigating whether MYB83 is degraded by MPK6. To do this, we carried out protein blot analysis of MYB83-HA fusion proteins expressed in AMPs with or without CAMPK6. MYB46-HA was included as a positive control. MYB83 protein level was not changed regardless of CAMPK6 co-expression while MYB46 protein was degraded in the presence of CAMPK6 (Fig 6B), suggesting that MYB83 is not a substrate for MPK6. This observation was confirmed by expressing MYB83-GFP fusion construct (35S::MYB83-GFP) in AMPs with or without CAMPK6-YFP fusion construct (35S::CAMPK6-YFP). GFP signal was detected in the MYB83 regardless of CAMPK6 co-expression (Fig 6C).

thumbnail
Fig 6. MYB83, a paralog of MYB46, is not regulated by MPK6.

(A) Schematic drawing of phosphorylation target sites in MYB83 predicted by Eukaryotic Linear Motif (http://elm.eu.org/). MPK docking domain was not identified in MYB83 but the same MPK docking domain of MYB46 was introduced to produce mMYB83 as shown. (B) Protein blot analysis of MYB83. MYB46-HA or MYB83-HA was transfected with CAMPK6 in designated combinations in AMPs. After 10-hr incubation, protein blot analysis was carried out with anti-HA antibody. (C) MYB83-GFP signal. MYB83-GFP expressed in AMPs with or without CAMPK6-YFP. Image was taken after incubation for 10-hr by fluorescence microscopy. (D) CCoAOMT promoter activities. CCoAOMT::GUS was transfected to AMPs with MYB46, MYB83 and CAMPK6 in designated combinations. After 6-hr incubation, the cells were harvested and GUS activities were measured. NAN was used as expression control. (E) Stability of the MPK docking motif introduced MYB83 mutant protein (mMYB83) was not affected by CAMPK6. Protein blot analysis of both MYB83 and mMYB83 was done with CAMPK6 co-expression.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009510.g006

Since MYB83 protein stability is not affected by MPK6, we expected its function may not be regulated by CAMPK6. To test this hypothesis, we used a GUS reporter gene driven by the promoter of CCoAOMT1, a direct target of both MYB46 and MYB83 [20] in TAA using AMPs (Fig 6D). GUS expression was increased by either MYB46 or MYB83 expression without CAMPK6 co-expression but the MYB46-induced GUS activity was reduced when CAMPK6 was co-expressed. However, this decrease was not observed with MYB83 even in the presence of CAMPK6, suggesting that MYB83 is not regulated by MPK6.

To see if the absence of N-terminal MPK docking domain in MYB83 is the reason why MPK6 does not regulate MYB83 activity, we introduced the same MPK docking domain of MYB46 to the N-terminal of MYB83 (mMYB83, Fig 6A). However, the stability of the resulting mMYB83 was not affected by CAMPK6 (Fig 6E). Thus, these results further support the conclusion that MYB83 is not regulated by MPK6.

Discussion

The R2R3-MYB transcription factor MYB46 functions as a master switch for secondary cell wall biosynthesis, which is critical for growth of vascular plants [4, 5, 20]. Talyor-Teeples et al [9] reported that salt stress increased MYB46 gene expression but did not alter the expressions of its direct target genes (e.g., lignin biosynthetic genes) in Arabidopsis roots, suggesting an existence of post-transcriptional or translational regulatory mechanism of MYB46 activity. In this study, we demonstrated that MYB46 activity is post-translationally regulated by direct binding of MPK6 through various biochemical and genetic experiments.

The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MPK) cascade is a highly conserved signal transduction module involved in transducing extracellular signals (e.g., positional and environmental information) to the nucleus for appropriate biochemical and physiological cellular responses. In silico analysis showed that MYB46 has a putative MPK-docking domain and two phosphorylation target sites, suggesting that MPK signaling may be involved in the regulation of MYB46 function. Firstly, we found that MPK6 phosphorylates MYB46 protein with a direct interaction by employing an Y2H assay, BiFC experiments, co-IP and immunocomplex kinase assay (Fig 1). Next, we showed that MYB46 protein stability is negatively regulated by the site-specific phosphorylation of MYB46 by CAMPK6 through ubiquitin mediated proteasome pathway (Figs 2 and 4). Finally, we demonstrated that MPK6-mediated MYB46 phosphorylation regulates in planta secondary wall forming function of MYB46 (Figs 3 and 5). In addition, we provide experimental evidences that MYB83, a paralog of MYB46, is not regulated by MPK6 (Fig 6).

Initially, we focused on both MPK3 and MPK6 because they are closely related [23, 24] and post-translationally activated by salt stress [11, 16, 25]. In order to study their ability to target MYB46 as substrate, we used constitutively-active form of MPK3 (i.e., CAMPK3) and MPK6 (i.e., CAMPK6) because they do not require their upstream kinases for activation [26]. Both CAMPK3 and CAMPK6 have been shown to phosphorylate conventional MPK phosphorylation sites and interact with upstream kinases as well as their substrates [27]. Furthermore, the mutations that led to the constitutively active form do not affect substrate specificity [27]. Indeed, CAMPK6 showed stronger phosphorylation activity than MPK6 (S5 Fig). Transcriptional activity and protein stability of MYB46 were significantly changed with CAMPK6 co-expression but not with CAMPK3 co-expression in AMPs (S1 Fig), suggesting that MYB46 may not be a substrate of MPK3. While both MPK3 and MPK6 are commonly activated by many environmental stress factors, their substrate specificity appears to be diverse. A kinase assay on a protein microarray carrying 1,690 Arabidopsis proteins identified 48 potential substrates of MPK3 and 39 potential substrates of MPK6, respectively, and only 26 of which were common substrates for both kinases [28].

In mammalian system, phosphorylation and ubiquitin-mediated proteasome pathway are prominent means of post-translational regulation of the activity of transcription factors [29, 30]. Many plant transcription factors (TFs) are also known to have their activity regulated by phosphorylation [22, 3136]. MPK-TF interactions lead to either negative or positive regulation of the activity of the TFs. We found that MYB46 protein stability is negatively regulated by MPK6 via ubiquitin-mediated proteasome pathway (Fig 2), resulting in reduction of its transcriptional activity (Fig 3).

Little is known about the post-translational regulation of MYB46, a master switch of secondary wall biosynthesis, and the interplay between environmental signaling and secondary wall biosynthesis. Our MPK6-MYB46 regulatory module provides a novel insight into a mechanism by which plants incorporate environmental signals into differential regulation of secondary wall synthesis. The advantages of this post-translational regulation are the speed and specificity of plant response to environmental changes. Thus, this MPK6-MYB46 regulatory module may afford the affected plant a rapid and efficient means to cope with those unexpected and quickly changing abiotic stresses which occur in nature.

Materials and methods

Plant growth conditions

For phenotypic analysis, A. thaliana plants were grown in soil under a photoperiod of 16-hr light/8-hr dark at 24°C. For protoplast generation, plants were grown in soil for 23 to 25 days under a photoperiod of 13-hr light/11-hr dark at 23°C. The humidity was adjusted to 50%.

Generation of Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts (AMP)s and transient activation assay (TAA)

Protoplast generation and TAA were performed as described previously [6, 22]. For the effector constructs, full-length gene constructs were ligated between the CaMV 35S promoter and the nopaline synthase terminator after removing GUS from the pTrGUS vector. Reporter constructs were used as previously described [5]. The primers used for PCR amplification of full-length genes and point-mutants are listed in S1 Table. For protein blot analysis and detection of GFP signal, genes were cloned in HA and GFP tagged HBT vector [18]. Plasmid DNA was prepared using a Plasmid Plus Maxi kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA), and used for transfection as shown in S2 Table. For internal control for GUS activity normalization, 6 μg of NAN plasmid [37] was added. Then, 17 μl of plasmid mixture (34 μg) and 200 μl of protoplasts were transferred to 2 ml microcentrifuge tubes following the procedure described by [37]. β-Glucuronidase and NAN enzyme assays were performed as described by [38]. NAN and GUS activities were measured using MUN (Sigma-Aldrich Co.) and MUG (Sigma-Aldrich Co.) as substrates, respectively, against MU standards on a SpectraMax M2 Microplate Readers (excitation: 365 nm, emission: 455). The ratio of GUS and NAN activities is represented as relative GUS/NAN units. Three biological replicates were used in the experiments.

Protein blot analysis

The cells were lysed using sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) protein sample buffer and heated at 95°C for 5 min after transfection with designated plasmid combinations. The protein blot analysis was performed as described previously [18]. Anti-MYB46 antibody was purchased from Abmart (http://www.ab-mart.com/).

Yeast two hybrid assay

Interaction of MYB46 with CAMPK6 was confirmed by His auxotrophic growth of yeast. Yeast cells (AH109), transformed with the plasmid pairs indicated in Fig 1B, were cultured on synthetic dropout (SD) medium for nutritional selection. After 4 days, colony was transferred to SD-Leu-Trp-His + 1 mM 3AT, an SD medium without Leu, Trp, His with 1 mM 3AT, and spot assay was carried out.

BiFC Assay

MYB46-EYFP, EYFP-MYB46, CAMPK6-EYFP, and EYFP-CAMPK6 constructs using pSAT4-DEST-nEYFP-C1, pSAT5-DEST-cEYFP-C1, pSAT4(A)-DEST-nEYFP-N1 and pSAT5(A)-DEST-cEYFP-N1 were transfected to AMPs with designated combinations in Fig 1D (for PCR primer and vector information, see S1 and S2 Tables). After 10-hr incubation, the cells were observed and imaged with a fluorescence microscope (339 Leica DRAMA2 Fluorescent microscope).

Immunocomplex kinase assay

MYB46-GFP construct and CAMPK6-HA construct were transfected to AMPs and incubated for 10-hr. After incubation, immunocomplex kinase assay was performed as described previously [38]. Briefly, after transfection, the cells were disrupted and the supernatant was used in agarose-immunoprecipitation. Immunocomplexed agarose was washed and phosphorylated using the phosphorylation buffer (20 mM Tris-HC1 [pH 7.5], 40 mM MgCl2, 5mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mM ATP, 0.25 mg ml-1 and 50 μM [γ-32P] ATP) for 30 min at room temperature. The samples were separated with SDS-PAGE and phosphorylation was detected with phosphor-image analyzer (FLA-7000, Fujifilm, Japan) after gel dry.

Co-immunoprecipitation assay

After 1-hr co-transfection of GFP conjugated to MYB46 and HA conjugated to CAMPK6 in AMPs, the cells were treated with 1 μL of 5 mM of MG132 and additionally incubated 10-hr at room temperature. The immunoprecipitation step was followed by immunocomplex kinase assay method and protein blot analysis was carried out with anti-HA antibody and anti-GFP antibody.

Phloroglucinol-HCl staining

Arabidopsis root or rosette-level stem sections were stained with 2% phloroglucinol-HCl for 3 min and imaged by microscope (Diaphot Inverted ELWD0.3, Nikon).

qRT-PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted from leaves of 2- or 3-week-old Arabidopsis plants using RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). For cDNA synthesis, SuperScript™ II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) was used. qPCR was carried out with specific primers on 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) using comparative Ct method with Fast SYBR™ Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). Means of log-transformed data were compared by t-test using PROC TTEST in SAS v9.4 (SAS Institute, Chicago, IL, USA), and statistical significance was determined at 3 levels (α = 0.1, α = 0.05, α = 0.01; n = 3).

DEX treatment

DEX-inducible CAMPK6/myb83 plants were grown in soil for 2.5 weeks, then sprayed with 5 μM DEX + 0.015% Silwet L-77 + 0.05% ethanol. After 24-hr, leaves were harvested for qRT-PCR. Plants were sprayed three additional times at 3 day intervals, and photographed 1 week after the final treatment.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. MYB46 transcriptional activity and its protein stability are not regulated by CAMPK3, a constitutively activated MPK3.

(A) CESA8 promoter activities. pCESA8::GUS construct was transfected to AMPs with MYB46, CAMPK3 and CAMPK6 in designated combinations. After 6-hr incubation the cells were harvested and GUS activities were measured. NAN was used as expression control. (B) MYB46-GFP signal. MYB46-GFP construct was expressed in AMPs with or without CAMPK3. CAMPK6 was used as positive control. Image was taken after incubation for 10-hr by fluorescence microscopy. (C) Protein blot analysis of MYB46. MYB46-HA was transfected with or without CAMPK3 or CAMPK6 in designated combinations in AMPs. After 10-hr incubation protein blot analysis was carried out with anti-HA antibody.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009510.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Phosphomimic mutation at either one of the target sites resulted in degradation of MYB46 protein.

(A) Protein blot analysis from 3-weeks-old T1 transgenic plants overexpressing MYB46 (MYB46OX) or its phospho-mimics (MYB46S138E). The proteins were detected with anti-MYB46 antibodies. (B) Gene expression analysis of MYB46 and its direct target genes in 3-weeks-old T1 transgenic plants overexpressing MYB46 (MYB46OX) or its phospho-mimics (MYB46S138E). The qRT-PCR was carried out with gene specific primers.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009510.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Mutation of putative ubiquitination site increases the stability of phosphormimic MYB46 mutant protein.

Ubiquitination site was predicted from UbPred (http://www.ubpred.org/) and Lys156 was predicted as a putative ubiquitination site. Lys156 to Arg mutations were done in two phosphormimic mutant MYB46 proteins, and protein blot analysis was carried out.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009510.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Ectopic lignification by overexpression of MYB46S138R/ T199R is not reduced by CAMPK6.

Stem anatomical observation was done using 8-week-old designated plants. Rosette-level stems were sectioned by hand and stained with phloroglucinol-HCl and then imaged by microscope. Col-0 and MYB46OX (A); T1 lines of MYB46S138R/ T199ROX T1 plants (B); MYB46S138R/ T199ROX/CAMPK6OX T1 plants (C). Red arrowheads indicate ectopic lignifications. Scale bar, 100 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009510.s004

(TIF)

S5 Fig. CAMPK6, a constitutively-active MPK6, negatively regulates MYB46 activity.

(A) In vitro kinase assay of MPK6 and CAMPK6. MPK6-HA and CAMPK6-HA were expressed in AMPs. Immunoprecipitation was carried out using anti-HA antibody and followed by kinase assay. Myelin Basic Protein (MBP) was used as a substrate. (B) MYB46 dependently induced CESA8 promoter activity is reduced by CAMPK6 co-expression. After 6-hr of incubation, the cells were harvested for GUS activity measurement. NAN was used as expression control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009510.s005

(TIF)

S1 Table. Sequence of primers used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009510.s006

(PDF)

S2 Table. Promoter and effector construct combinations in PEG-transfection.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009510.s007

(PDF)

References

  1. 1. Lerouxel O, Cavalier DM, Liepman AH, Keegstra K. Biosynthesis of plant cell wall polysaccharides—a complex process. Current Opinion In Plant Biology. 2006;9(6):621–30. pmid:17011813.
  2. 2. Ko JH, Kim WC, Kim JY, Ahn SJ, Han KH. MYB46-Mediated Transcriptional Regulation of Secondary Wall Biosynthesis. Molecular Plant. 2012;5(5):961–3. pmid:22914575.
  3. 3. Kim W-C, Kim JY, Ko J-H, Kang H, Han K-H. Identification of direct targets of transcription factor MYB46 provides insights into the transcriptional regulation of secondary wall biosynthesis. Plant molecular biology. 2014;85:589–99. pmid:24879533.
  4. 4. Zhong R, Richardson EA, Ye Z-H. The MYB46 transcription factor is a direct target of SND1 and regulates secondary wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant cell. 2007;19(9):2776–92. pmid:17890373; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2048704.
  5. 5. Ko J-H, Kim W-C, Han K-H. Ectopic expression of MYB46 identifies transcriptional regulatory genes involved in secondary wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant journal: for cell and molecular biology. 2009;60(4):649–65. pmid:19674407.
  6. 6. Kim W-C, Ko J-H, Kim JY, Kim J-M, Bae H-J, Han K-H. MYB46 directly regulates the gene expression of secondary wall-associated cellulose synthases in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal. 2013;73:26–36. pmid:26011122.
  7. 7. Kim W-C, Kim JY, Ko J-H, Kim J, Han K-H. Transcription factor MYB46 is an obligate component of the transcriptional regulatory complex for functional expression of secondary wall-associated cellulose synthases in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2013;170(15):1374–8. pmid:23726771.
  8. 8. Kim W-C, Reca I-B, Kim Y, Park S, Thomashow MF, Keegstra K, et al. Transcription factors that directly regulate the expression of CSLA9 encoding mannan synthase in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant molecular biology. 2014;84:577–87. pmid:24243147.
  9. 9. Taylor-Teeples M, Lin L, de Lucas M, Turco G, Toal TW, Gaudinier A, et al. An Arabidopsis gene regulatory network for secondary cell wall synthesis. Nature. 2015;517(7536):571–5. pmid:25533953; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4333722.
  10. 10. Wu Y, Cosgrove DJ. Adaptation of roots to low water potentials by changes in cell wall extensibility and cell wall proteins. Journal Of Experimental Botany. 2000;51(350):1543–53. pmid:11006305.
  11. 11. Ichimura K, Mizoguchi T, Yoshida R, Yuasa T, Shinozaki K. Various abiotic stresses rapidly activate Arabidopsis MAP kinases ATMPK4 and ATMPK6. The Plant journal: for cell and molecular biology. 2000;24(5):655–65. pmid:11123804.
  12. 12. Zhao C, Wang P, Si T, Hsu C-C, Wang L, Zayed O, et al. MAP Kinase Cascades Regulate the Cold Response by Modulating ICE1 Protein Stability. Developmental Cell. 2017;43(5):618–29.e5. pmid:29056551; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5716877.
  13. 13. Popescu SC, Popescu GV, Bachan S, Zhang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M, et al. MAPK target networks in Arabidopsis thaliana revealed using functional protein microarrays. Genes & Development. 2009;23(1):80–92. pmid:19095804; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2632172.
  14. 14. Sharrocks AD, Yang SH, Galanis A. Docking domains and substrate-specificity determination for MAP kinases. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 2000;25(9):448–53. pmid:10973059.
  15. 15. Yu L, Nie J, Cao C, Jin Y, Yan M, Wang F, et al. Phosphatidic acid mediates salt stress response by regulation of MPK6 in Arabidopsis thaliana. The New phytologist. 2010;188(3):762–73. pmid:20796215.
  16. 16. Pitzschke A, Datta S, Persak H. Salt stress in Arabidopsis: lipid transfer protein AZI1 and its control by mitogen-activated protein kinase MPK3. Mol Plant. 2014;7(4):722–38. pmid:24214892; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3973493.
  17. 17. Sethi V, Raghuram B, Sinha AK, Chattopadhyay S. A mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade module, MKK3-MPK6 and MYC2, is involved in blue light-mediated seedling development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2014;26(8):3343–57. pmid:25139007; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4371833.
  18. 18. Im JH, Cho YH, Kim GD, Kang GH, Hong JW, Yoo SD. Inverse modulation of the energy sensor Snf1-related protein kinase 1 on hypoxia adaptation and salt stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ. 2014;37(10):2303–12. pmid:24890857.
  19. 19. Lee DH, Goldberg AL. Proteasome inhibitors: valuable new tools for cell biologists. Trends in cell biology. 1998;8(10):397–403. pmid:9789328.
  20. 20. McCarthy RL, Zhong R, Ye Z-H. MYB83 Is a Direct Target of SND1 and Acts Redundantly with MYB46 in the Regulation of Secondary Cell Wall Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2009;50(11):1950–64. pmid:19808805.
  21. 21. Kurashima K, Yu FH, Cabado AG, Szabó EZ, Grinstein S, Orlowski J. Identification of sites required for down-regulation of Na+/H+ exchanger NHE3 activity by cAMP-dependent protein kinase. phosphorylation-dependent and -independent mechanisms. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1997;272(45):28672–9. pmid:9353335.
  22. 22. IM JH, Cho Y-H, KIM G-D, KANG G-H, HONG J-W, Yoo S-D. Inverse modulation of the energy sensor Snf1-related protein kinase 1 on hypoxia adaptation and salt stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell and Environment. 2014:n/a-n/a. pmid:24890857
  23. 23. Guan Y, Lu J, Xu J, McClure B, Zhang S. Two Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, MPK3 and MPK6, Are Required for Funicular Guidance of Pollen Tubes in Arabidopsis. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 2014;165(2):528–33. pmid:24717717; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4044831.
  24. 24. Wang H, Ngwenyama N, Liu Y, Walker JC, Zhang S. Stomatal development and patterning are regulated by environmentally responsive mitogen-activated protein kinases in Arabidopsis. The Plant cell. 2007;19(1):63–73. pmid:17259259; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1820971.
  25. 25. Teige M, Scheikl E, Eulgem T, Dóczi R, Ichimura K, Shinozaki K, et al. The MKK2 pathway mediates cold and salt stress signaling in Arabidopsis. Molecular Cell. 2004;15(1):141–52. pmid:15225555.
  26. 26. Berriri S, Garcia AV, Frey NFD, Rozhon W, Pateyron S, Leonhardt N, et al. Constitutively Active Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Versions Reveal Functions of Arabidopsis MPK4 in Pathogen Defense Signaling. Plant Cell. 2012;24(10):4281–93. WOS:000312378300031. pmid:23115249
  27. 27. Berriri S, Garcia AV, Frei dit Frey N, Rozhon W, Pateyron S, Leonhardt N, et al. Constitutively active mitogen-activated protein kinase versions reveal functions of Arabidopsis MPK4 in pathogen defense signaling. THE PLANT CELL ONLINE. 2012;24(10):4281–93. pmid:23115249; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3517250.
  28. 28. Feilner T, Hultschig C, Lee J, Meyer S, Immink RGH, Koenig A, et al. High throughput identification of potential Arabidopsis mitogen-activated protein kinases substrates. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 2005;4(10):1558–68. pmid:16009969.
  29. 29. Geng F, Wenzel S, Tansey WP. Ubiquitin and proteasomes in transcription. Annual review of biochemistry. 2012;81:177–201. pmid:22404630; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3637986.
  30. 30. Poizat C, Puri PL, Bai Y, Kedes L. Phosphorylation-Dependent Degradation of p300 by Doxorubicin-Activated p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase in Cardiac Cells. Molecular and cellular biology. 2005;25(7):2673–87. pmid:15767673; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1061628.
  31. 31. Jeong E-Y, Seo PJ, Woo JC, Park C-M. AKIN10 delays flowering by inactivating IDD8 transcription factor through protein phosphorylation in Arabidopsis. BMC plant biology. 2015;15(1):110. pmid:25929516; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4416337.
  32. 32. Kawamoto N, Sasabe M, Endo M, Machida Y, Araki T. Calcium-dependent protein kinases responsible for the phosphorylation of a bZIP transcription factor FD crucial for the florigen complex formation. Scientific Reports. 2015;5:8341. pmid:25661797; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4321167.
  33. 33. Mao G, Meng X, Liu Y, Zheng Z, Chen Z, Zhang S. Phosphorylation of a WRKY transcription factor by two pathogen-responsive MAPKs drives phytoalexin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. THE PLANT CELL ONLINE. 2011;23(4):1639–53. pmid:21498677; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3101563.
  34. 34. Meng X, Xu J, He Y, Yang K-Y, Mordorski B, Liu Y, et al. Phosphorylation of an ERF transcription factor by Arabidopsis MPK3/MPK6 regulates plant defense gene induction and fungal resistance. THE PLANT CELL ONLINE. 2013;25(3):1126–42. pmid:23524660; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3634681.
  35. 35. Morse AM, Whetten RW, Dubos C, Campbell MM. Post-translational modification of an R2R3-MYB transcription factor by a MAP Kinase during xylem development. The New phytologist. 2009;183(4):1001–13. pmid:19566814.
  36. 36. Zhai Q, Yan L, Tan D, Chen R, Sun J, Gao L, et al. Phosphorylation-coupled proteolysis of the transcription factor MYC2 is important for jasmonate-signaled plant immunity. PLoS genetics. 2013;9(4):e1003422. pmid:23593022; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3616909.
  37. 37. IM JH, Yoo S-D. Transient expression in Arabidopsis leaf mesophyll protoplast system for cell-based functional analysis of MAPK cascades signaling. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, NJ). 2014;1171(Chapter 1):3–12. pmid:24908115
  38. 38. Kirby JJ, Kavanagh TAT. NAN fusions: a synthetic sialidase reporter gene as a sensitive and versatile partner for GUS. The Plant journal: for cell and molecular biology. 2002;32(3):391–400. pmid:12410816.