Peer Review History

Original SubmissionJanuary 27, 2025
Decision Letter - Gregory J. Pazour, Editor, Fengwei Yu, Editor

PGENETICS-D-25-00071

Left-right cortical interactions drive intracellular pattern formation  in the ciliate Tetrahymena

PLOS Genetics

Dear Dr. Gaertig,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Genetics. As you can see, the reviewers were positive about this work, but raised important points that you should consider. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript within 30 days Apr 03 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosgenetics@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgenetics/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

* A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. This file does not need to include responses to formatting updates and technical items listed in the 'Journal Requirements' section below.

* A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

* An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, competing interests statement, or data availability statement, please make these updates within the submission form at the time of resubmission. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Gregory J. Pazour

Academic Editor

PLOS Genetics

Fengwei Yu

Section Editor

PLOS Genetics

Aimée Dudley

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

Anne Goriely

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

Journal Requirements:

1) We ask that a manuscript source file is provided at Revision. Please upload your manuscript file as a .doc, .docx, .rtf or .tex. If you are providing a .tex file, please upload it under the item type u2018LaTeX Source Fileu2019 and leave your .pdf version as the item type u2018Manuscriptu2019.

2) Please note that the Author Summary should appear in your manuscript between the Abstract (if applicable) and the Introduction, and should be 150-200 words long. The aim should be to make your findings accessible to a wide audience that includes both scientists and non-scientists. Sample summaries can be found on our website under Submission Guidelines:

https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/s/submission-guidelines#loc-parts-of-a-submission

3) Your manuscript is missing the following section: Abstract.  Please ensure all required sections are present and in the correct order. Make sure section heading levels are clearly indicated in the manuscript text, and limit sub-sections to 3 heading levels. An outline of the required sections can be consulted in our submission guidelines here:

https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/s/submission-guidelines#loc-parts-of-a-submission 

4) Please upload all main figures as separate Figure files in .tif or .eps format. For more information about how to convert and format your figure files please see our guidelines: 

https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/s/figures

5) We notice that your supplementary Figures are included in the main figures file. Please remove them and upload them with the file type 'Supporting Information'. Please ensure that each Supporting Information file has a legend listed in the manuscript after the references list.

6) Some material included in your submission may be copyrighted. According to PLOSu2019s copyright policy, authors who use figures or other material (e.g., graphics, clipart, maps) from another author or copyright holder must demonstrate or obtain permission to publish this material under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License used by PLOS journals. Please closely review the details of PLOSu2019s copyright requirements here: PLOS Licenses and Copyright. If you need to request permissions from a copyright holder, you may use PLOS's Copyright Content Permission form.

Please respond directly to this email and provide any known details concerning your material's license terms and permissions required for reuse, even if you have not yet obtained copyright permissions or are unsure of your material's copyright compatibility. Once you have responded and addressed all other outstanding technical requirements, you may resubmit your manuscript within Editorial Manager. 

Potential Copyright Issues:

i) Figure S2A. Please confirm whether you drew the images / clip-art within the figure panels by hand. If you did not draw the images, please provide (a) a link to the source of the images or icons and their license / terms of use; or (b) written permission from the copyright holder to publish the images or icons under our CC BY 4.0 license. Alternatively, you may replace the images with open source alternatives. See these open source resources you may use to replace images / clip-art:

- https://commons.wikimedia.org

- https://openclipart.org/.

7) Please note that your Data Availability Statement is currently missing the DOI/accession number of each dataset OR a direct link to access each dataset. If your manuscript is accepted for publication, you will be asked to provide these details on a very short timeline. We therefore suggest that you provide this information now, though we will not hold up the peer review process if you are unable.

8) Please amend your detailed Financial Disclosure statement. This is published with the article. It must therefore be completed in full sentences and contain the exact wording you wish to be published.

1) State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

9)  Please ensure that the funders and grant numbers match between the Financial Disclosure field and the Funding Information tab in your submission form. Note that the funders must be provided in the same order in both places as well. Currently, the order of the grants is different in both places.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Reviewer #1: In the study entitled “Left-right cortical interactions drive intracellular pattern formation in the ciliate Tetrahymena”, Chinkyu Lee, Ewa Joachimiak, Wolfgang Maier, Yu-Yang Jiang, Karl F. Lechtreck, Eric S. Cole, and Jacek Gaertig identified, for the first time, the Tetrahymena gene HPO1 (TTHERM_001276421), which encodes a ARMC9-like protein responsible for the mutant phenotypes previously linked to Tetrahymena hypoangular 1 (hpo1) alleles. Homozygous hpo1 mutants exhibit multiple oral apparatus (OA) with abnormal positioning to the left or right of the normal site in the cell.

The authors provide strong evidence that hpo1 gene is responsible for these phenotypes by generating Tetrahymena strains carrying previously described hpo1 mutations and hpo1 knockout strains, both displaying similar phenotypes. They further localized the Hpo1 protein to ciliary basal bodies using a strain expressing Hpo1-GFP, or Hpo1-3xHA and assessed its overexpression phenotype. Their findings reveal that and Hpo1 protein preferentially localizes to anterior basal bodies along a subset of ciliary rows on the cell’s right side, with levels highest at the most anterior basal bodies and decreasing along the row length. These gradients are crucial for defining contractile vacuole pores positioning and ensuring OA exclusion from the right side of the cell.

Additionally, the authors explored genetic interactions between the genes bcd1 (cell’s left side-enriched factor) and janA (encodes a Polo kinase), which localizes to the left-to-dorsal circumferential region of Tetrahymena. They found that Hpo1 interacts with Bcd1, and the simultaneous loss of both proteins is lethal, severely disrupting OA positioning and organization. This interesting study builds on the authors' previous work on the gradient-forming factors involved in ciliate morphogenesis, as well as the maintenance and organization of complex cortical organelles during cell division.

The paper is worthy of publication; however, incorporating some minor suggestions will improve the manuscript.

• Figure 5 – In both confocal and SR-SIM images, it is challenging to observe the increased number of rows with enriched Hpo1-3xHA in the janC-4 background compared to the wild type, as shown in panel E. Therefore, these images may not be the most representative. For the confocal images, it would be helpful to include a wild type cell for comparison.

• Figure 7 – In panels (C-C’’), it would be helpful to include an SR-SIM image of a wild type cell’s apical region for comparison with the images of a cell expressing Hpo1-3xHA (red) in the bcd1-2background.

• A schematic similar to Figure 6K would be beneficial to summarize the findings from Figures 7 and 8, particularly regarding the genetic interaction between bcd1-2 and hpo1-3.

• It may be possible to combine Figures 7 and 8 if the confocal images from Figure 8 are moved to the supplementary figures. However, it is essential to clearly indicate in the panels that the cells in Figure 8 are homozygous for bcd1-2.

• Figure 9 – It would be helpful to indicate in the panels that the cells in the images are bcd1-2;hpo1-KO double homozygotes.

• Figure S4 – Although this information is provided in the legend, it would be helpful to indicate in the figure itself that the panels show janC-4 homozygotes.

• Figure S5 – As the authors mention, the Bcd1-GFP signal is indeed quite weak. However, it appears to be even weaker in hpo1-3 (panels C-D’’’). Is this observation accurate?

Reviewer #2: Summary:

In this manuscript entitled “Left-right cortical interactions drive intracellular pattern formation in the ciliate Tetrahymena” (PGENETICS-D-25-00071), the authors report the identification of the protein encoded by the gene mutated in hypoangular 1 mutants of Tetrahymena as a ARMC9-like protein. These mutants have defects in circumferential patterning detected by shortening of the distance between the oral apparatus and the contractile vacuole pores. This is caused by a progressively rightward shift in the formation of a new oral appartus each cell division.By using whole-genome sequencing and variant analysis of wild-type and mutant genetic segregants, the authors were able to convincing identify the HPO1 gene. The original mutant alleles appeared to be hypomorphs and a gene knockout caused a more penetrant/severe phenotype. The hpo1 protein was shown to localize to the cells right lateral side. The shift of the oral primordium in that direction suggests that normally, the hpo1 gene product acts negatively to restrict the formation of a new oral apparatus where hpo1 is present. The hpo mutants not only shift the position of oral apparatus, but exhibit multiple foci of oral basal body poliferation, similar to the bcd1 mutants. The authors show that the bcd1/hpo1 double mutant cells result in cell lethality. This synthetic lethal phenotype is significant as Bcd1 is localized to the region to the left of the oral primorium. The authors propose that the two gene products act synergistically to prevent new oral apparatus formation to the left and the right of the row topped by the old oral apparatus. This study provides one of the first identifications of gene that controls left-right asymmetry in Tetrahymena.

Strengths:

The study is carefully executed and the experiments well described. The identification of the hpo1 protein is one of the first descriptions of the action of a protein that controls circumferential patterning in these highly structured unicellular eukaryotes, Tetrahymena. The genetic interactions and detailed cellular localization of the hpo1 protein in both Janus A (JanA) and broaden cortical domains (Bcd1) proteins provides important insight into the interplay into these major patterning determinants. This study reveals that multiple proteins with specific localizations provides the groundwork to future studies to characterize the precise signaling events needed for a Tetrahymena cell to precisely produce a daughter cell each cell division.

Weaknesses/comments to address:

1.There is little discussion as to how this ARMC9 protein may act to repress oral formation. Given that ARMC9 proteins are found in basal bodies and cilia in mammalian cells, the authors postulate that its role in circumferential patterning may be neo-functionalization. As a genetic definition, this is sufficient, but we don’t really learn of any possible molecular action through their findings or discussion.

2. Page 12. The heading states that Hpo1 interacts with Bcd1. As the results reveal a synthetic lethality/genetic interaction, I would suggest making the heading reflect the data. When this reviewer reads X interacts with Y, I expect of see some protein-protein interaction. Please provide a more specific heading.

3. Page 19. In the discussion of the JanC/Hpo1 double mutant phenotype, i.e. the primary and secondary oral apparati are closer, the authors indicate that suggest that the hpo1 gene product likely restricts the position of oral appartus formation of both the primary and secondary oral apparati. From the images shown in figure 6, it was not clear whether both the position of primary and secondary oral apparati are shifted equally.

4. It would be interesting to discuss why the Hpo1 and Bcd1 show synthetic lethality but not the JanC and Hpo1.

Minor comments:

The second paragraph at the top of page 14 is one sentence and appears to be a statement without context. Was this an error during editing? What this suppose to be the end to the previous paragraph.

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy , and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

Figure resubmission:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step. If there are other versions of figure files still present in your submission file inventory at resubmission, please replace them with the PACE-processed versions.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that authors deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Revision 1

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers.docx
Decision Letter - Gregory J. Pazour, Editor, Fengwei Yu, Editor

Dear Dr Gaertig,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "Left-right cortical interactions drive intracellular pattern formation  in the ciliate Tetrahymena" has been editorially accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics. Congratulations!

Before your submission can be formally accepted and sent to production you will need to complete our formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. Please be aware that it may take several days for you to receive this email; during this time no action is required by you. Please note: the accept date on your published article will reflect the date of this provisional acceptance, but your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until the required changes have been made.

Once your paper is formally accepted, an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you’ve already opted out via the online submission form. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online or are unsure if you have already indicated as such, please let the journal staff know immediately at plosgenetics@plos.org.

In the meantime, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgenetics/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information to ensure an efficient production and billing process. Note that PLOS requires an ORCID iD for all corresponding authors. Therefore, please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field.  This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager.

If you have a press-related query, or would like to know about making your underlying data available (as you will be aware, this is required for publication), please see the end of this email. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming article at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. Inform journal staff as soon as possible if you are preparing a press release for your article and need a publication date.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Genetics!

Yours sincerely,

Gregory J. Pazour

Academic Editor

PLOS Genetics

Fengwei Yu

Section Editor

PLOS Genetics

Aimée Dudley

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

Anne Goriely

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

www.plosgenetics.org

Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

----------------------------------------------------

Comments from the reviewers (if applicable):

----------------------------------------------------

Data Deposition

If you have submitted a Research Article or Front Matter that has associated data that are not suitable for deposition in a subject-specific public repository (such as GenBank or ArrayExpress), one way to make that data available is to deposit it in the Dryad Digital Repository . As you may recall, we ask all authors to agree to make data available; this is one way to achieve that. A full list of recommended repositories can be found on our website .

The following link will take you to the Dryad record for your article, so you won't have to re‐enter its bibliographic information, and can upload your files directly: 

http://datadryad.org/submit?journalID=pgenetics&manu=PGENETICS-D-25-00071R1

More information about depositing data in Dryad is available at http://www.datadryad.org/depositing. If you experience any difficulties in submitting your data, please contact help@datadryad.org for support.

Additionally, please be aware that our data availability policy  requires that all numerical data underlying display items are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this before we can formally accept your manuscript, if not already present.

----------------------------------------------------

Press Queries

If you or your institution will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, or if you need to know your paper's publication date for media purposes, please inform the journal staff as soon as possible so that your submission can be scheduled accordingly. Your manuscript will remain under a strict press embargo until the publication date and time. This means an early version of your manuscript will not be published ahead of your final version. PLOS Genetics may also choose to issue a press release for your article. If there's anything the journal should know or you'd like more information, please get in touch via plosgenetics@plos.org .

Formally Accepted
Acceptance Letter - Gregory J. Pazour, Editor, Fengwei Yu, Editor

PGENETICS-D-25-00071R1

Left-right cortical interactions drive intracellular pattern formation  in the ciliate Tetrahymena

Dear Dr Gaertig,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "Left-right cortical interactions drive intracellular pattern formation  in the ciliate Tetrahymena" has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics! Your manuscript is now with our production department and you will be notified of the publication date in due course.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, unless you have opted out or your manuscript is a front-matter piece, the early version of your manuscript will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting PLOS Genetics and open-access publishing. We are looking forward to publishing your work!

With kind regards,

Zsofia Freund

PLOS Genetics

On behalf of:

The PLOS Genetics Team

Carlyle House, Carlyle Road, Cambridge CB4 3DN | United Kingdom

plosgenetics@plos.org | +44 (0) 1223-442823

plosgenetics.org | Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

Open letter on the publication of peer review reports

PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.

We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.

Learn more at ASAPbio .