Peer Review History

Original SubmissionAugust 24, 2020
Decision Letter - Peter McKinnon, Editor, Charis Eng, Editor

* Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. *

Dear Dr Byrjalsen,

Thank you very much for submitting your Research Article entitled 'Nationwide Germline Whole Genome Sequencing of 198 Consecutive Pediatric Cancer Patients Reveals a High Incidence of Cancer Prone Syndromes' to PLOS Genetics. Your manuscript was fully evaluated at the editorial level and by independent peer reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic but identified some aspects of the manuscript that should be improved.

We therefore ask you to modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations before we can consider your manuscript for acceptance. Your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer.

In addition we ask that you:

1) Provide a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

2) Upload a Striking Image with a corresponding caption to accompany your manuscript if one is available (either a new image or an existing one from within your manuscript). If this image is judged to be suitable, it may be featured on our website. Images should ideally be high resolution, eye-catching, single panel square images. For examples, please browse our archive. If your image is from someone other than yourself, please ensure that the artist has read and agreed to the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License. Note: we cannot publish copyrighted images.

We hope to receive your revised manuscript within the next 30 days. If you anticipate any delay in its return, we would ask you to let us know the expected resubmission date by email to plosgenetics@plos.org.

If present, accompanying reviewer attachments should be included with this email; please notify the journal office if any appear to be missing. They will also be available for download from the link below. You can use this link to log into the system when you are ready to submit a revised version, having first consulted our Submission Checklist.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying graphs or summary statistics are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this upon resubmission if not already present. In addition, we do not permit the inclusion of phrases such as "data not shown" or "unpublished results" in manuscripts. All points should be backed up by data provided with the submission.

PLOS has incorporated Similarity Check, powered by iThenticate, into its journal-wide submission system in order to screen submitted content for originality before publication. Each PLOS journal undertakes screening on a proportion of submitted articles. You will be contacted if needed following the screening process.

To resubmit, you will need to go to the link below and 'Revise Submission' in the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder.

[LINK]

Please let us know if you have any questions while making these revisions.

Yours sincerely,

Charis Eng

Associate Editor

PLOS Genetics

Peter McKinnon

Section Editor: Cancer Genetics

PLOS Genetics

Please address the comments of both expert reviewers.

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: The review note is uploaded

Reviewer #2: Byrjalsen et al submitted a manuscript summarizing the results of nationwide germline whole genome sequencing in 198 consecutive pediatric cancer patients over two years (July 2016 to June 2018) from 4 pediatric cancer units in Denmark. Main results of this study include the discovery of molecularly confirmed cancer predisposition syndrome (CPS) or suspected CPS based on Jongmans’/MIPOGG criteria in close to half of the study cohort. This study replicated results of prior study (Zang et al) that childhood-onset CPS can be seen in up to 10% of newly diagnosed pediatric cancers. The authors claim the strength of their study methods to include broader range pediatric cancer diagnosis and the inclusion of structural variants detection in their genomic analysis pipeline. This study also validated the sensitivity of MIPOGG and Jongmans’ clinical criteria as screening tools for childhood-onset CPS.

Major comments and questions:

1. The authors identified 29/94 (31%) had molecularly confirmed CPS leaving the other 65 patients met the only clinical criteria for CPS. It will be interesting to do subset analysis on this group of patients as far as the number of VUS and enrichment of pathways compared to those who screened negative.

2. DDX41 was listed as gene predisposing to childhood cancers. To this reviewer knowledge, there has no reported cases of cancers in pediatric group (0-17 years) linked to pathogenic germline DDX41 variants outside of this study. Please provide reference(s) to support your argument.

3. Germline mutations in APC has been linked to pediatric medulloblastoma so this gene should be listed as gene associated with childhood and adult onset CPS.

4. The authors reported that the study identified a pathogenic variant in 8 out of 21 pediatric CPS patients while the other 13 were previously known to have CPS. Please clarify how these 13 patients were ascertained to have CPS prior to this study?

5. Under the family history section, I would advise describing the status of family history of cancers in 29 cases with confirmed pathogenic variants in CPS genes.

6. Only 22% of the patients with adult-onset CPS screened positive on Jongmans’/MIPOGG criteria compared to 86 % for childhood-onset CPS. It will be a great point for discussion to see if this discrepancy is due to family history status or unique type of cancers between the two groups.

Minor comments:

1. It’s easier for the readers to follow the manuscript when a proportion is written in a uniform way (listing nominator and denominator), for instance : “Overall 70/198 (35.4%) patients fulfilled….”

2. Page 11 last paragraph : “(85.7%)” should be placed after “18”

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: review notes.docx
Revision 1

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: Response to reviewer comments.docx
Decision Letter - Peter McKinnon, Editor, Charis Eng, Editor

Dear Dr Byrjalsen,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "Nationwide Germline Whole Genome Sequencing of 198 Consecutive Pediatric Cancer Patients Reveals a High Incidence of Cancer Prone Syndromes" has been editorially accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics. Congratulations!

Before your submission can be formally accepted and sent to production you will need to complete our formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. Please be aware that it may take several days for you to receive this email; during this time no action is required by you. Please note: the accept date on your published article will reflect the date of this provisional accept, but your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until the required changes have been made.

Once your paper is formally accepted, an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you’ve already opted out via the online submission form. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online or are unsure if you have already indicated as such, please let the journal staff know immediately at plosgenetics@plos.org.

In the meantime, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgenetics/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information to ensure an efficient production and billing process. Note that PLOS requires an ORCID iD for all corresponding authors. Therefore, please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field.  This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager.

If you have a press-related query, or would like to know about one way to make your underlying data available (as you will be aware, this is required for publication), please see the end of this email. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming article at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. Inform journal staff as soon as possible if you are preparing a press release for your article and need a publication date.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Genetics!

Yours sincerely,

Charis Eng

Associate Editor

PLOS Genetics

Peter McKinnon

Section Editor: Cancer Genetics

PLOS Genetics

www.plosgenetics.org

Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

----------------------------------------------------

Comments from the reviewers (if applicable):

Thank you for your responsiveness to original review.

----------------------------------------------------

Data Deposition

If you have submitted a Research Article or Front Matter that has associated data that are not suitable for deposition in a subject-specific public repository (such as GenBank or ArrayExpress), one way to make that data available is to deposit it in the Dryad Digital Repository. As you may recall, we ask all authors to agree to make data available; this is one way to achieve that. A full list of recommended repositories can be found on our website.

The following link will take you to the Dryad record for your article, so you won't have to re‐enter its bibliographic information, and can upload your files directly: 

http://datadryad.org/submit?journalID=pgenetics&manu=PGENETICS-D-20-01316R1

More information about depositing data in Dryad is available at http://www.datadryad.org/depositing. If you experience any difficulties in submitting your data, please contact help@datadryad.org for support.

Additionally, please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying display items are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this before we can formally accept your manuscript, if not already present.

----------------------------------------------------

Press Queries

If you or your institution will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, or if you need to know your paper's publication date for media purposes, please inform the journal staff as soon as possible so that your submission can be scheduled accordingly. Your manuscript will remain under a strict press embargo until the publication date and time. This means an early version of your manuscript will not be published ahead of your final version. PLOS Genetics may also choose to issue a press release for your article. If there's anything the journal should know or you'd like more information, please get in touch via plosgenetics@plos.org.

Formally Accepted
Acceptance Letter - Peter McKinnon, Editor, Charis Eng, Editor

PGENETICS-D-20-01316R1

Nationwide Germline Whole Genome Sequencing of 198 Consecutive Pediatric Cancer Patients Reveals a High Incidence of Cancer Prone Syndromes

Dear Dr Wadt,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "Nationwide Germline Whole Genome Sequencing of 198 Consecutive Pediatric Cancer Patients Reveals a High Incidence of Cancer Prone Syndromes" has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics! Your manuscript is now with our production department and you will be notified of the publication date in due course.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, unless you have opted out or your manuscript is a front-matter piece, the early version of your manuscript will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting PLOS Genetics and open-access publishing. We are looking forward to publishing your work!

With kind regards,

Nicola Davies

PLOS Genetics

On behalf of:

The PLOS Genetics Team

Carlyle House, Carlyle Road, Cambridge CB4 3DN | United Kingdom

plosgenetics@plos.org | +44 (0) 1223-442823

plosgenetics.org | Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

Open letter on the publication of peer review reports

PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.

We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.

Learn more at ASAPbio .