Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Anti-granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor autoantibodies: A rising cause of infectious diseases

  • Shang-Yu Wang ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Shang-Yu Wang, Yu-Fang Lo

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliations Laboratory of Human Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Institute of Immunology and Translational Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Division of General Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

  • Yu-Fang Lo ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Shang-Yu Wang, Yu-Fang Lo

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Project administration, Writing – original draft

    Affiliations Laboratory of Human Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Institute of Immunology and Translational Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Center for Molecular and Clinical and Immunology, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

  • Yu-Huan Tsai,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Division of General Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Center for Molecular and Clinical and Immunology, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Laboratory of Host–Microbe Interactions and Cell Dynamics, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Laboratory Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

  • Cheng-Lung Ku

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    * clku@cgu.edu.tw

    Affiliations Laboratory of Human Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Institute of Immunology and Translational Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Center for Molecular and Clinical and Immunology, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Center for Drug Research and Development, College of Human Ecology, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Taoyuan, Taiwan

Anti-cytokine autoantibody as the phenocopy of inborn error of immunity

Autoantibodies are produced even in individuals with normal lymphocyte maturation. Current evidence suggests that approximately 55% to 75% of antibodies expressed during human B lymphocyte maturation are autoantibodies [1]. In later stages of maturation, B lymphocytes producing autoantibodies are typically inhibited through various mechanisms to maintain self-tolerance [1]. Nevertheless, autoantibodies can still be detected in healthy adults [2]. Cytokines, critical regulators of various immune and physiological functions, are widely applied in clinical settings. Apart from cases where cytokine therapies, such as interferon for hepatitis C, induce anti-cytokine autoantibodies, anti-cytokine autoantibodies are ubiquitous in individuals with various clinical manifestations [2]. The presence of anti-cytokine autoantibodies reflects a complex interplay between immune regulation and environmental triggers. These anti-cytokine autoantibodies, while often clinically silent, can disrupt immune homeostasis under specific conditions, leading to significant pathological consequences. Anti-granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor autoantibodies (anti-GM-CSF-Abs) are one such example, detectable in approximately 3% of individuals [3]. In recent years, anti-cytokine autoantibodies have been increasingly recognized as a cause of immunodeficiency in severe infections [4]. Unlike inborn error of immunity (IEI), which are typically genetic origin and manifest in childhood [4], immunodeficiency due to anti-cytokine autoantibodies is usually acquired later in life and manifested the similar clinical phenotype as the cognate genetic defect, as considered as a phenocopy of these IEI. Now, anti-cytokine autoantibodies are also acknowledged as an etiology of this kind of immunodeficiency. In the following sections, we explore anti-GM-CSF-Abs, a type of anti-cytokine autoantibody, and their associated immunodeficiency phenotypes.

Anti-GM-CSF-Ab blocks the physiological functions of GM-CSF

GM-CSF, initially identified as a hematopoietic growth factor, influences both hematopoietic progenitor cells and mature immune cells. GM-CSF is majorly produced by helper T cells, but also by other lymphocytes, macrophages, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, chondrocytes, and tumor cells in response to immunogenic stimuli, particularly inflammation-induced cytokines [5]. Under normal physiological conditions, GM-CSF levels are low, indicating its role as a conditionally induced cytokine. However, GM-CSF also has a constitutive function, notably maintaining alveolar surfactant homeostasis by supporting alveolar macrophage activity. This homeostatic role is particularly critical in lungs, where GM-CSF facilitates the clearance of surfactant lipids and proteins, preventing alveolar dysfunction, and sustained innate immunity against pulmonary pathogens.

The first recognized clinical phenotype associated with anti-GM-CSF-Abs, identified in the 1990s, was pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP), a disease characterized by excessive accumulation of phospholipid-rich surfactant in the alveoli [6]. Anti-GM-CSF-Ab-related PAP, termed autoimmune PAP (aPAP), accounts for approximately 90% of PAP cases [7]. Autoimmune PAP phenocopies congenital PAP, which results from genetic mutations in the GM-CSF receptor. Both conditions share a pathogenesis involving impaired GM-CSF signaling. Normally, GM-CSF signaling enables alveolar macrophages to maintain surfactant homeostasis, preventing surfactant accumulation and respiratory impairment [8]. In aPAP, anti-GM-CSF-Abs neutralize GM-CSF, impairing alveolar macrophage maturation and function, ultimately resulting in disease manifestation [9]. Clinically, the diagnosis of aPAP frequently relies on bronchoalveolar lavage and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), revealing characteristic findings such as “crazy-paving” patterns and ground-glass opacities [10]. Serologically, the diagnosis involves identifying a critical threshold level of anti-GM-CSF-Abs known to correlate with disease development [9]. Current management for PAP relies primarily on palliative whole lung lavage (WLL) to physically remove accumulated surfactant. However, high recurrence rates and the invasive nature of WLL underscore a critical need for targeted interventions. Although inhaled recombinant GM-CSF has been utilized, its clinical efficacy remains inconsistent across patient cohorts [11].

Anti-GM-CSF-Ab as a pathogenic factor for specific infectious diseases

In addition to the pathogenesis of aPAP, the anti-GM-CSF-Abs are recently unexpected linked to rare infectious diseases (Fig 1). While large, nationwide cohorts have reported PAP cases, infectious diseases associated with anti-GM-CSF-Abs are documented sporadically, and their pathogenesis is less understood [7]. The first association was reported by Rosen et al. in 2013, identifying anti-GM-CSF-Abs as a risk factor for cryptococcal meningitis [12]. In 2014, Saijo et al. demonstrated that anti-GM-CSF-Abs were specific to central nervous system (CNS) infections caused by Cryptococcus gattii (C. gattii) [13]. Subsequently, Kuo et al. reported a case series of patients with disseminated C. gattii cryptococcosis without aPAP [14]. Unlike Cryptococcus neoformans (C. neoformans), which primarily affects immunocompromised individuals, C. gattii-related cryptococcosis occurs in otherwise healthy individuals. Initially classified as C. neoformans var. gattii, C. gattii was formally established as a separate species in the early 2000s [15,16]. The C. gattii species complex comprises five genotypes (VGI ~ VGV), including C. gattii sensu stricto (VGI) and C. deuterogattii (VGII), the most common two genotypes in immunocompetent subjects [16]. The genotypes VGIII and VGIV mainly affect subjects with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) [17]. Regarding its environmental distribution, VGI, followed by VGII, is the most widely isolated genotype globally, with documented presence in Australia, North America, Europe (specifically the Netherlands and France), China, and Papua New Guinea [18,19]. In contrast, genotypes VGIII, VGIV, and VGV exhibit a more restricted geographical distribution [18]. There is a notable discrepancy between the environmental and clinical distributions of C. gattii. Many documented cases are linked to the presence of anti-GM-CSF-Abs, creating a publication bias that likely masks the actual clinical epidemiological landscape. After a thorough review, the geographical distribution of reported C. gattii infection is demonstrated in Fig 2, and the literature sources for the geographical analysis are summarized (S1 Data). While the Pacific Northwest remains, a well-recognized endemic region following its historical expansion, the identification of antibody-associated cases is predominantly concentrated in areas with active screening programs, such as Taiwan and Colombia. This suggests a significant diagnostic bias where the lack of routine autoantibody testing likely masks the true clinical prevalence of this occult immunodeficiency in other potentially endemic hotspots.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Clinical significance of anti-GM-CSF-Ab.

Blockage of GM-CSF function by these autoantibodies results in clinical phenotypes, including autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis and specific infectious diseases. Figure created with BioRender.com. Created in BioRender. Chung, P. H. (2026) https://BioRender.com/fydf3kn.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1014116.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. Global distribution of Cryptococcus gattii reports.

Red and blue circles indicate study cohorts with and without anti-GM-CSF-Ab screening, respectively. Circle sizes are proportional to the total case count in each geographical region. This map was generated using R software with the “maps” and “ggplot2” packages. Base map data from the R ‘maps’ package (derived from CIA World DataBank II; public domain). Source Link: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=maps.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1014116.g002

Although CNS involvement is most prevalent in reports, pulmonary infection is also a significant clinical manifestation. In North American outbreaks, C. deuterogattii (VGIIa, a molecular subtype of VGII) predominantly caused pulmonary infections, whereas in Australia and New Zealand, C. gattii sensu stricto frequently involved the CNS (74% to 86%) [20]. Unlike C. neoformans cryptococcosis, C. gattii infections are characterized by space-occupying lesions, which may mimic neoplastic diseases or pyogenic abscesses [20]. In an Asian cohort, patients with anti-GM-CSF-Abs and C. gattii cryptococcosis presented with cryptococcomas initially misdiagnosed as brain tumors, a feature absent in C. neoformans infections. The formation of cryptococcomas in C. gattii infections often complicates diagnosis, as these lesions may require biopsy or surgical interventions to differentiate from malignancies. Antifungal regimens for anti-GM-CSF-Ab cryptococcosis generally align with standard treatment used for cryptococcosis, and clinical outcomes for anti-GM-CSF-Abs-associated cryptococcosis are superior to those without autoantibodies, likely because these infections occur in otherwise healthy individuals [21]. Beyond C. gattii cryptococcosis, anti-GM-CSF-Abs are also associated with disseminated nocardiosis and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, though these occur far less frequently [2224].

A decisive mechanism governs specific phenotype development

Available evidence suggests three major phenotypes associated with anti-GM-CSF-Abs: aPAP, C. gattii cryptococcosis, and nocardiosis. These phenotypes rarely coexist within the same individual, highlighting a striking selectivity in disease manifestation despite the shared underlying autoantibody presence. Although occasional case reports describe overlapping presentations, such as rare instances where patients might develop secondary infections alongside aPAP, real-world data and large cohort studies indicate minimal overlap [21,25]. A comprehensive Japanese cohort study involving 223 patients with aPAP, enrolled over six years in a national registry, and reported intercurrent infections in only about 5% of cases; notably, none of these infections involved C. gattii cryptococcosis or nocardiosis, underscoring the infrequency of such complications and the absence of phenotypic crossover in this large group [25]. Similarly, an in-depth analysis of the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), which explored the epidemiology of cryptococcosis and PAP across a broad population, found no instances of overlap between PAP and cryptococcosis diagnoses [21]. While reports of overlapping phenotypes exist, publication bias may exaggerate their prevalence, as such atypical cases tend to prompt targeted testing for anti-GM-CSF-Abs and subsequentiy to be reported, potentially skewing perceptions of rarity [26]. The distinct phenotypic expression may be influenced by antibody titers, host genetic factors, or environmental exposures, which could modulate the immune response and determine disease specificity. Collectively, current evidence from these epidemiological and clinical investigations strongly supports the existence of a decisive immunological or environmental mechanism, possibly involving pathogen-specific interactions or subtle variations in autoantibody neutralization of GM-CSF signaling, underlying the selective manifestation of one particular phenotype over the others, emphasizing the need for further interdisciplinary research to unravel these determinants.

Anti-GM-CSF-Abs require mechanistic study to explain their mysterious pathogen specificity and non-overlapping clinical phenotypes

Several unresolved questions remain regarding anti-GM-CSF autoantibodies-Abs. First, their associated infectious diseases show remarkable specificity, being almost exclusively linked to C. gattii and Nocardia species in CNS. The underlying reasons for this restricted pathogen spectrum and CNS tropism are unknown. Second, the three majorly described clinical phenotypes—aPAP, cryptococcosis, and nocardiosis—rarely overlap in the same patient, either synchronously or sequentially, suggesting distinct and non-redundant pathogenic mechanisms.

To address these questions, mechanistic studies are needed to dissect the role of GM-CSF in CNS and lung immunity. The documented role of GM-CSF in invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, provides valuable insights into the pathogenesis of anti-GM-CSF-Ab-associated cryptococcosis and nocardiosis. In Aspergillus models, GM-CSF acts as a critical licensing factor from lung epithelial cells that orchestrates the neutrophil oxidative burst and glycolytic reprogramming in monocytes [27,28]. We infer that a similar disruption of this pulmonary defense predisposes patients to C. gattii and Nocardia. Notably, unlike Aspergillus, which typically remains localized to the lungs, C. gattii and Nocardia exhibit a unique propensity for dissemination and CNS involvement, highlighting a distinct clinical phenotype despite a possibly shared underlying immune defect.

Addressing the remaining challenges in anti-GM-CSF-Ab-associated diseases will require multifaceted clinical and research strategies. Approaches such as animal infection models or advanced organoid systems could clarify how anti-GM-CSF-Ab shapes host defense against C. gattii and Nocardia. Besides, a more detailed characterization of the antibodies themselves, including their isotypes, affinities, epitope specificities, and effector functions, will be crucial to determine how they impair GM-CSF-mediated immune pathways. Such investigations may provide the basis for understanding disease specificity and heterogeneity and ultimately inform rational therapeutic strategies.

Supporting information

S1 Data. Literature sources and references for Fig 2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1014116.s001

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Pei-Han Chung for his technical assistance in creating the scientific illustration in Fig 1.

References

  1. 1. Wardemann H, Yurasov S, Schaefer A, Young JW, Meffre E, Nussenzweig MC. Predominant autoantibody production by early human B cell precursors. Science. 2003;301(5638):1374–7. pmid:12920303
  2. 2. Watanabe M, Uchida K, Nakagaki K, Kanazawa H, Trapnell BC, Hoshino Y, et al. Anti-cytokine autoantibodies are ubiquitous in healthy individuals. FEBS Lett. 2007;581(10):2017–21. pmid:17470370
  3. 3. Sergeeva A, Ono Y, Rios R, Molldrem JJ. High titer autoantibodies to GM-CSF in patients with AML, CML and MDS are associated with active disease. Leukemia. 2008;22(4):783–90. pmid:18216869
  4. 4. Puel A, Bastard P, Bustamante J, Casanova J-L. Human autoantibodies underlying infectious diseases. J Exp Med. 2022;219(4):e20211387. pmid:35319722
  5. 5. Kumar A, Taghi Khani A, Sanchez Ortiz A, Swaminathan S. GM-CSF: a double-edged sword in cancer immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2022;13:901277. pmid:35865534
  6. 6. Dranoff G, Crawford AD, Sadelain M, Ream B, Rashid A, Bronson RT, et al. Involvement of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in pulmonary homeostasis. Science. 1994;264(5159):713–6. pmid:8171324
  7. 7. Chuang C-H, Cheng C-H, Tsai Y-C, Tsai M-J, Sheu C-C, Chong I-W. Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2023;122(10):1061–8. pmid:37105870
  8. 8. Carey B, Trapnell BC. The molecular basis of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Clin Immunol. 2010;135(2):223–35. pmid:20338813
  9. 9. Trapnell BC, Carey BC, Uchida K, Suzuki T. Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, a primary immunodeficiency of impaired GM-CSF stimulation of macrophages. Curr Opin Immunol. 2009;21(5):514–21. pmid:19796925
  10. 10. Kumar A, Abdelmalak B, Inoue Y, Culver DA. Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis in adults: pathophysiology and clinical approach. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6(7):554–65. pmid:29397349
  11. 11. McCarthy J, Boyle N, McCarthy C. Recombinant GM-CSF drug evaluation review. Immunotherapy. 2025;17(14):983–93. pmid:41085041
  12. 12. Rosen LB, Freeman AF, Yang LM, Jutivorakool K, Olivier KN, Angkasekwinai N, et al. Anti-GM-CSF autoantibodies in patients with cryptococcal meningitis. J Immunol. 2013;190(8):3959–66. pmid:23509356
  13. 13. Saijo T, Chen J, Chen SC-A, Rosen LB, Yi J, Sorrell TC, et al. Anti-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor autoantibodies are a risk factor for central nervous system infection by Cryptococcus gattii in otherwise immunocompetent patients. mBio. 2014;5(2):e00912-14. pmid:24643864
  14. 14. Kuo C-Y, Wang S-Y, Shih H-P, Tu K-H, Huang W-C, Ding J-Y, et al. Disseminated cryptococcosis due to anti-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor autoantibodies in the absence of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. J Clin Immunol. 2017;37(2):143–52. pmid:28013480
  15. 15. Kwon-Chung KJ, Boekhout T, Fell JW, Diaz M. Proposal to conserve the name Cryptococcus gattii against C. hondurianus and C. bacillisporus (Basidiomycota, Hymenomycetes, Tremellomycetidae). Taxon. 2002;51(4):804–6.
  16. 16. Hagen F, Khayhan K, Theelen B, Kolecka A, Polacheck I, Sionov E, et al. Recognition of seven species in the Cryptococcus gattii/Cryptococcus neoformans species complex. Fungal Genet Biol. 2015;78:16–48. pmid:25721988
  17. 17. Cao C. The emerging fungal pathogen Cryptococcus gattii: epidemiology, pathogenesis, immunomodulatory attributes, and drug susceptibility. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025;19(7):e0013245. pmid:40608829
  18. 18. Diaz JH. The disease ecology, epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and management of emerging Cryptococcus gattii complex infections. Wilderness Environ Med. 2020;31(1):101–9. pmid:31813737
  19. 19. Poplin V, Smith C, Caceres DH, Herkert PF, Jegede O, Thompson GR 3rd, et al. Geographical distribution of the Cryptococcus gattii species complex: a systematic review. Lancet Microbe. 2024;5(12):100921. pmid:39191262
  20. 20. McMullan BJ, Sorrell TC, Chen SC-A. Cryptococcus gattii infections: contemporary aspects of epidemiology, clinical manifestations and management of infection. Future Microbiol. 2013;8(12):1613–31. pmid:24266360
  21. 21. Wang S-Y, Lo Y-F, Shih H-P, Ho M-W, Yeh C-F, Peng J-J, et al. Cryptococcus gattii infection as the major clinical manifestation in patients with autoantibodies against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J Clin Immunol. 2022;42(8):1730–41. pmid:35947322
  22. 22. Rosen LB, Rocha Pereira N, Figueiredo C, Fiske LC, Ressner RA, Hong JC, et al. Nocardia-induced granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor is neutralized by autoantibodies in disseminated/extrapulmonary nocardiosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(7):1017–25. pmid:25472947
  23. 23. Wishart AL, Pechacek J, Rosen LB, Desai JV, Zarakas MA, Webb T, et al. Neutralizing GM-CSF autoantibodies impair neutrophil antifungal effector function in a patient with aspergillosis. J Infect. 2025;91(3):106588. pmid:40812454
  24. 24. Lo Y-F, Wang S-Y, Wu Y-H, Ho M-W, Yeh C-F, Wu T-Y, et al. The pathogenic role of anti-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor autoantibodies in the nocardiosis with the central nervous system involvement. J Clin Immunol. 2024;44(8):176. pmid:39133333
  25. 25. Inoue Y, Trapnell BC, Tazawa R, Arai T, Takada T, Hizawa N, et al. Characteristics of a large cohort of patients with autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis in Japan. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177(7):752–62. pmid:18202348
  26. 26. Punatar AD, Kusne S, Blair JE, Seville MT, Vikram HR. Opportunistic infections in patients with pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. J Infect. 2012;65(2):173–9. pmid:22484272
  27. 27. Mills KAM, Westermann F, Espinosa V, Rosiek E, Desai JV, Aufiero MA, et al. GM-CSF-mediated epithelial-immune cell cross-talk orchestrates pulmonary immunity to Aspergillus fumigatus. Sci Immunol. 2025;10(105):eadr0547. pmid:40117345
  28. 28. Kasahara S, Jhingran A, Dhingra S, Salem A, Cramer RA, Hohl TM. Role of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor signaling in regulating neutrophil antifungal activity and the oxidative burst during respiratory fungal challenge. J Infect Dis. 2016;213(8):1289–98. pmid:26908736