Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Shapeshifting fungi: How morphological transitions can influence pathogenesis

Introduction

Fungal pathogens pose an increasing global threat to humans [1], animals [2], and crops [3]. A hallmark of many successful fungal pathogens is their ability to change morphology during infection. Transitions between life-cycle stages—such as forming robust spores, dispersible yeasts, or invasive hyphae—enable fungi to invade, spread, and persist in hostile host environments. Elucidating how and why fungi make these transitions is essential for understanding fungal virulence and developing new antifungal strategies. Here, we highlight the strategies of three fungal “shapeshifters” from distinct phyla and hosts (Fig 1) to illustrate how morphological plasticity underlies pathogenesis.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Fungal morphological plasticity enables different pathogenic strategies.

(Above) The three species of fungi addressed herein and representative images of their morphologies at key stages. (Below) Schematic of morphological transitions made by these fungi and their corresponding roles in pathogenesis. Arrows are colored according to morphological transitions, corresponding to borders of representative images: color at the base of the arrow indicates the initial morphology, and the color at the tip of the arrow is the transitioned morphology. Scale bars each 20 microns. Candida albicans images credit Dr. Teresa O’Meara; E. muscae images credit Dr. Gabrielle Paniccia; O. novo-ulmi images credit Dr. Tuan Duong.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1014035.g001

Shifting to evade: Entomophthora muscae

Entomophthora muscae is an obligate fungal pathogen of flies best known for its ability to produce a striking “zombie” phenotype that ensures efficient spore dispersal [4,5]. Yet beyond its behavioral manipulation, the lifecycle of E. muscae is remarkable for its sequence of unusual morphological transitions and immune-evasive strategies.

Infection begins when a conidium lands on the cuticle of a susceptible fly. The spore germinates, producing a chitinous germ tube that breaches the cuticle. Once through this barrier, E. muscae deposits a cell into the hemolymph that differs fundamentally from typical fungal forms: a cell wall-less protoplast. This unique morphology has long been hypothesized to be central to the pathogen’s success [6]. Unlike vertebrates, insects rely exclusively on innate immunity and the recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) to recognize pathogenic threats and mount defensive responses, including the production of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) [7]. Because insects recognize fungal pathogens primarily through conserved cell wall components like chitin and β-glucans, the absence of a wall would effectively conceal E. muscae from immune detection, allowing it to operate largely undetected within the host.

This wall-less lifestyle is common among fungi in the family Entomophthoraceae. Studies with related fungi show that protoplasts are poor inducers of host immune responses [8,9]. Supporting this, Drosophila injected with E. muscae protoplasts failed to activate the Toll pathway, and mortality was similar between wild-type and immune-compromised flies [10]. When infection occurred through the natural route (spore germination through cuticle) flies lacking Toll or melanization pathways succumbed faster than wild-type, though all still eventually died. These results suggest that immune signaling is triggered briefly during cuticular penetration, when the chitin-rich germ tube exposes fungal PAMPs, but once inside, the unwalled protoplast operates with near immunological impunity.

Upon entering the fly hemolymph, E. muscae protoplasts selectively target the fat body for degradation, a major metabolic and immune organ analogous to a combination of mammalian liver and adipose tissue [11]. Fungal cells then proliferate rapidly until the fly’s abdomen appears visibly opaque. As infection nears completion, the fungus undergoes a dramatic morphological shift back to a walled form (hyphae) in preparation for emergence and sporulation. This transition is likely driven by a metabolic cue, potentially linked to exhaustion of fat body resources, though the precise trigger remains unclear. At this stage, fungal cells degrade remaining organs, harvesting the last available nutrients while inducing host behaviors that position the moribund fly for optimal spore dispersal. By the time the fungus reforms its antigenic cell walls, the fat body is destroyed, and the host’s immune capacity is effectively gone. Specialized hyphae then breach the cuticle, and conidiophores erupt through intersegmental membranes to release infectious conidia into the environment, completing the cycle.

Thus, where most fungi rely on a rigid wall for protection, E. muscae’s protoplasts achieve the same end by evasion rather than defense. By toggling between hidden and coated forms, the fungus balances stealth within the host and resilience outside it.

Shifting to invade: Candida albicans

Candida albicans is a common human gut commensal [12] that can opportunistically cause localized and systemic infections [13,14]. Consequently, the World Health Organization designates C. albicans as a fungal pathogen of critical priority [15]. Virulence in systemic C. albicans infection relies on shifting between unicellular yeast and filamentous hyphae or pseudohyphae; mutants that cannot switch between yeast and hyphal forms (and vice versa) show attenuated virulence [16,17]. Indeed, yeast-hyphal dimorphism is a recurring theme among many significant mammalian fungal pathogens [18].

While the yeast form of C. albicans is typically associated with commensalism, this morphology also plays an important role in fungal dissemination, especially when dispersing from biofilms [19]. In hospital settings, C. albicans frequently forms heterogeneous biofilms composed of yeast and filamentous cells on the surfaces of medical devices. When implanted into patients, the yeast cells pass easily from the biofilm to the patient’s bloodstream and, from there, into multiple organs. Attachment to host cells in these organs stimulates the formation of hyphae, which then invade host tissue either by exerting physical force [20] or by inducing host endocytosis through receptor activation and cytoskeletal rearrangement [21].

Shapeshifting of C. albicans also facilitates immune escape. When yeast-stage cells are engulfed by macrophages, they can induce pyroptosis in the engulfing macrophage to kill it [22], then become hyphal to break out of the dead cell [2325]. Notably, these changes in cell morphology also alter the interactions of C. albicans with the host immune system. Host dendritic cells activate different populations of T helper cells in response to C. albicans yeast and hyphae [23], and the larger hyphae stimulate neutrophils to release extracellular traps that are critical for the host’s ability to clear large pathogens [24].

The importance of shape-shifting to the pathogenesis of C. albicans has made fungal morphogenesis an attractive target for the development of new drugs and therapies [25]. Several studies have identified small molecules that inhibit the ability of C. albicans to transition from yeast to hyphae [2628], and antisense oligonucleotides targeting cell wall genes have been effective in treating a mouse model of systemic candidiasis [29]. This new generation of drugs may turn the reliance of C. albicans on shapeshifting into a weakness rather than a strength.

Shifting to spread: Ophiostoma novo-ulmi

Ophiostoma novo-ulmi is the aggressive causative agent of the current Dutch Elm Disease (DED) pandemic [30]. Its virulence depends on the transition from yeast-like budding spores to hyphae [31]. O. novo-ulmi is vectored to host trees by bark beetles (genera Scolytus or Hylurgopinus) carrying its yeast-like spores. The beetle transmits the fungus into the elm’s xylem—the water-distributing vascular system of the plant—allowing spores to disseminate. Both yeast and hyphal forms grow in the xylem, but it is the hyphal form that enables the fungus to spread between different xyloid veins, breaking through pit membranes to invade adjacent vessels. In this way, the yeast contributes to the vertical spread of the fungus through the tree, while the hyphal form allows for its lateral spread, a strategy similar to the one employed by C. albicans in humans. Following host mortality—which can occur within a year of infection—the fungus transitions to saprophytic growth and produces spores that stick to eclosing beetles.

Morphology of O. novo-ulmi is dictated by fungal strain, available nutrients, and the inoculum size [32,33]. Nitrogen source, for example, can bias development, with the fungus producing a higher proportion of mycelia if the nitrogen source is ammonium sulfate but more yeast if the source is proline [32]. Salicylic acid, a hormone involved in mediating plant immunity, also stimulates yeast cell production [33]. O. novo-ulmi also has quorum-sensing abilities that impact its morphology; when cultures are inoculated with large numbers of yeast-like spores (108 spores/mL), they tend to mostly favor spore over hyphal production [33]. In all of these growth experiments, different strains of O. novo-ulmi produced slightly different responses, with some strains showing stronger commitment to producing one fungal morphology than the other, even with stimulation.

Although the molecular pathogenesis of O. novo-ulmi is still being explored, transcriptomic studies have identified candidate genes involved in the yeast-to-hyphal transition [34] as well as candidate virulence genes [35]. Some among this latter category include genes that encode production of toxins, though these will need to be further investigated to assess their contribution to pathogenicity [36]. Future research into antagonists of O. novo-ulmi morphological transition or virulence may yield advances that turn the tide in the ongoing DED pandemic.

Conclusion

Across phyla and hosts, morphological plasticity serves as a common strategy for overcoming host defenses and optimizing growth. Whether toggling between yeast and hyphae to invade tissues, as seen in C. albicans and O. novo-ulmi, or shedding the cell wall for concealment like E. muscae, structural transitions are crucial in shaping the pathogenesis of these fungi.

While efforts to block morphogenesis in C. albicans are underway, the broader importance of fungal “shapeshifting” remains underappreciated. Morphological plasticity is a recurring strategy that underlies the virulence of diverse fungal pathogens. Indeed, while the three examples we highlighted exploit yeast-hyphal transitions, there are other morphological transitions that fungi leverage for pathogenesis. Cryptococcus neoformans, for example, forms Titan cells [37]—massive, multinucleate fungal cells that bud to produce normal sized daughters—while Coccidioides species form large, endospore-filled spherules [38]. Understanding how pathogenic fungi regulate diverse morphological transitions could have far-reaching implications for developing effective antifungal treatments across phyla.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Dr. Tuan Duong and Dr. Teresa O’Meara for providing bespoke microscopy images of O. novo-ulmi and Candida albicans, respectively. We are also grateful to Dr. Brandon Fricker and Dr. Leslie Torres Ulloa for their comments on this manuscript.

References

  1. 1. Huang J, Oliver N, Witt LS. The fungus among us: emerging and re-emerging fungal infections. Am J Med Sci. 2026;371(2):133–9. pmid:41135847
  2. 2. Williams SL, Toda M, Chiller T, Brunkard JM, Litvintseva AP. Effects of climate change on fungal infections. PLoS Pathog. 2024;20(5):e1012219. pmid:38814855
  3. 3. Mwangi RW, Mustafa M, Charles K, Wagara IW, Kappel N. Selected emerging and reemerging plant pathogens affecting the food basket: a threat to food security. J Agric Food Res. 2023;14:100827.
  4. 4. Krasnoff SB, Watson DW, Gibson DM, Kwan EC. Behavioral effects of the entomopathogenic fungus, Entomophthora muscae on its host Musca domestica: postural changes in dying hosts and gated pattern of mortality. J Insect Physiol. 1995;41(10):895–903.
  5. 5. Elya C, Lok TC, Spencer QE, McCausland H, Martinez CC, Eisen M. Robust manipulation of the behavior of Drosophila melanogaster by a fungal pathogen in the laboratory. Elife. 2018;7:e34414. pmid:30047862
  6. 6. Boomsma JJ, Jensen AB, Meyling NV, Eilenberg J. Evolutionary interaction networks of insect pathogenic fungi. Annu Rev Entomol. 2014;59:467–85. pmid:24160418
  7. 7. Lu HL, St Leger RJ. Insect immunity to entomopathogenic fungi. Adv Genet. 2016;94:251–85.
  8. 8. Butt T, Hajek A, Humber R. Gypsy moth immune defenses in response to hyphal bodies and natural protoplasts of entomophthoralean fungi. J Invertebr Pathol. 1996;68(3):278–85. pmid:8954816
  9. 9. Dunphy GB, Nolan RA. Cellular immune responses of spruce budworm larvae to Entomophthora egressa protoplasts and other test particles. J Invertebr Pathol. 1982;39: 81–92.
  10. 10. Liu G, Tian Y, Hanson MA, Li J, Lemaitre B. Drosophila host defense mechanisms against filamentous fungal pathogens with diverse lifestyles. bioRxiv. 2025;:2025.08.20.671119.
  11. 11. Li S, Yu X, Feng Q. Fat body biology in the last decade. Annu Rev Entomol. 2019;64:315–33. pmid:30312553
  12. 12. Nash AK, Auchtung TA, Wong MC, Smith DP, Gesell JR, Ross MC, et al. The gut mycobiome of the Human Microbiome Project healthy cohort. Microbiome. 2017;5(1):153. pmid:29178920
  13. 13. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20(1):133–63. pmid:17223626
  14. 14. Salmanton-García J, Cornely OA, Stemler J, Barać A, Steinmann J, Siváková A, et al. Attributable mortality of candidemia – Results from the ECMM Candida III multinational European Observational Cohort Study. J Infect. 2024;89(3):106229. pmid:39025408
  15. 15. WHO fungal priority pathogens list to guide research, development and public health action. World Health Organization; 25 Oct 2022 [cited 14 Nov 2025]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240060241
  16. 16. O’Meara TR, Veri AO, Ketela T, Jiang B, Roemer T, Cowen LE. Global analysis of fungal morphology exposes mechanisms of host cell escape. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6741. pmid:25824284
  17. 17. Lo HJ, Köhler JR, DiDomenico B, Loebenberg D, Cacciapuoti A, Fink GR. Nonfilamentous C. albicans mutants are avirulent. Cell. 1997;90:939–49.
  18. 18. Klein BS, Tebbets B. Dimorphism and virulence in fungi. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007;10(4):314–9. pmid:17719267
  19. 19. Wall G, Montelongo-Jauregui D, Vidal Bonifacio B, Lopez-Ribot JL, Uppuluri P. Candida albicans biofilm growth and dispersal: contributions to pathogenesis. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2019;52:1–6. pmid:31085405
  20. 20. Wächtler B, Wilson D, Haedicke K, Dalle F, Hube B. From attachment to damage: defined genes of Candida albicans mediate adhesion, invasion and damage during interaction with oral epithelial cells. PLoS One. 2011;6(2):e17046. pmid:21407800
  21. 21. Phan QT, Solis NV, Cravener MV, Swidergall M, Lin J, Huang MY, et al. Candida albicans stimulates formation of a multi-receptor complex that mediates epithelial cell invasion during oropharyngeal infection. PLoS Pathog. 2023;19(8):e1011579. pmid:37611070
  22. 22. Uwamahoro N, Verma-Gaur J, Shen H-H, Qu Y, Lewis R, Lu J, et al. The pathogen Candida albicans hijacks pyroptosis for escape from macrophages. mBio. 2014;5(2):e00003-14. pmid:24667705
  23. 23. Oh S, Li K, Prince A, Wheeler ML, Hamade H, Nguyen C, et al. Pathogen size alters C-type lectin receptor signaling in dendritic cells to influence CD4 Th9 cell differentiation. Cell Rep. 2022;38(13):110567. pmid:35354044
  24. 24. Branzk N, Lubojemska A, Hardison SE, Wang Q, Gutierrez MG, Brown GD, et al. Neutrophils sense microbe size and selectively release neutrophil extracellular traps in response to large pathogens. Nat Immunol. 2014;15(11):1017–25. pmid:25217981
  25. 25. Jacobsen ID, Wilson D, Wächtler B, Brunke S, Naglik JR, Hube B. Candida albicans dimorphism as a therapeutic target. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2012;10(1):85–93. pmid:22149617
  26. 26. Toenjes KA, Munsee SM, Ibrahim AS, Jeffrey R, Edwards JE Jr, Johnson DI. Small-molecule inhibitors of the budded-to-hyphal-form transition in the pathogenic yeast Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49(3):963–72. pmid:15728890
  27. 27. Pierce CG, Saville SP, Lopez-Ribot JL. High-content phenotypic screenings to identify inhibitors of Candida albicans biofilm formation and filamentation. Pathog Dis. 2014;70(3):423–31. pmid:24623598
  28. 28. Pavic A, Radakovic N, Moric I, Stankovic N, Opsenica D, Senerovic L. Long-chain 4-aminoquinolines inhibit filamentation and increase efficacy of nystatin against Candida albicans infections in vivo. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2024;10(1):146. pmid:39672811
  29. 29. Chung JY, Hong Y-K, Jeon E, Yang S, Park A, Weissleder R, et al. Effective treatment of systemic candidiasis by synergistic targeting of cell wall synthesis. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):5532. pmid:40595501
  30. 30. Brasier CM. Ophiostoma novo-ulmi sp. nov., causative agent of current Dutch elm disease pandemics. Mycopathologia. 1991;115(3):151–61.
  31. 31. Richards WC. Nonsporulation in the Dutch elm disease fungus Ophiostoma ulmi: evidence for control by a single nuclear gene. Can J Bot. 1994;72:461–7.
  32. 32. Naruzawa ES, Bernier L. Control of yeast-mycelium dimorphism in vitro in Dutch elm disease fungi by manipulation of specific external stimuli. Fungal Biol. 2014;118(11):872–84. pmid:25442291
  33. 33. Wedge M-È, Naruzawa ES, Nigg M, Bernier L. Diversity in yeast-mycelium dimorphism response of the Dutch elm disease pathogens: the inoculum size effect. Can J Microbiol. 2016;62(6):525–9. pmid:27068623
  34. 34. Nigg M, Bernier L. From yeast to hypha: defining transcriptomic signatures of the morphological switch in the dimorphic fungal pathogen Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. BMC Genomics. 2016;17(1):920. pmid:27846799
  35. 35. de Oliveira TC, Freyria NJ, Sarmiento-Villamil JL, Porth I, Tanguay P, Bernier L. Unraveling the transcriptional features and gene expression networks of pathogenic and saprotrophic Ophiostoma species during the infection of Ulmus americana. Microbiol Spectr. 2024;12(2):e0369423. pmid:38230934
  36. 36. Nigg M, de Oliveira TC, Sarmiento-Villamil JL, de la Bastide PY, Hintz WE, Sherif SM, et al. Comparative analysis of transcriptomes of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi ssp. americana colonizing resistant or sensitive genotypes of American elm. J Fungi (Basel). 2022;8(6):637. pmid:35736120
  37. 37. Zaragoza O, Nielsen K. Titan cells in Cryptococcus neoformans: cells with a giant impact. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2013;16(4):409–13. pmid:23588027
  38. 38. Kirkland TN, Stevens DA, Hung C-Y, Beyhan S, Taylor JW, Shubitz LF, et al. Coccidioides species: a review of basic research: 2022. J Fungi (Basel). 2022;8(8):859. pmid:36012847