Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

The microbiome and gut–lung axis in nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease

  • Ria N. Thompson ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    ria.thompson@uq.edu.au

    Affiliation Greenslopes Clinical Unit, Faculty of Health, Medicine & Behavioural Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

  • Antje Blumenthal,

    Roles Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Frazer Institute, The University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia

  • Mark Morrison,

    Roles Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Frazer Institute, The University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

  • Rachel M. Thomson

    Roles Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Greenslopes Clinical Unit, Faculty of Health, Medicine & Behavioural Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, Gallipoli Medical Research, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

Abstract

Nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) is increasingly recognised as a significant global health concern. It is characterised by a highly heterogenous clinical course and remains poorly understood, from host susceptibility to disease pathophysiology, and is notoriously difficult to treat. Recent advances highlight the microbiome as a critical modulator of host physiology, with site-specific ‘microbiota’ influencing the delicate balance between health, infection and disease. While microbial populations vary across discrete anatomical sites, there is a growing recognition that they are interconnected. For example, gut microbes can influence immune cell functions in the lung via the gut–lung axis (GLA). Drawing parallels with other related chronic respiratory diseases, it is hypothesised that microbiota–host-interactions shape susceptibility and manifestation of NTM-PD. This review synthesises current knowledge of some key host susceptibility factors in NTM-PD, and their potential interactions with host microbiota. With only recently emerging studies, we explore the potential role of the GLA in NTM-PD, given its promising links to microbial communities and immunological and metabolic pathways. We assess the limited, but growing body of research on the lung microbiota in NTM-PD and evaluate the small number of studies on faecal microbiota in NTM-PD. By considering insights across anatomical sites, this review aims to contextualise the microbiome within multiple dimensions of NTM-PD, including host susceptibility, disease progression, treatment responsiveness, and the effects of antibiotic therapy. A better understanding of the microbiome in NTM-PD could hold promise in uncovering the complex and multifactorial mechanisms that contribute to the heterogenous clinical course and challenging management of NTM-PD.

Section I: Background

What is nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease, who does it affect and how is it treated?

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are aerobic, non-motile opportunistic pathogens. NTM comprises a phylogenetically diverse group of environmental rapid- and slow-growing species and subspecies within the genus Mycobacterium (M.), distinct from the M. tuberculosis complex and M. leprae [1]. Extrapulmonary NTM infections such as skin, soft-tissue and musculoskeletal infections occur, but pulmonary infection and disease predominates clinically [2]. Laboratory isolation of NTM can reflect transient infection and is not always indicative of disease, making it challenging to make the distinction. Guidelines for the diagnosis of NTM-PD (rather than infection) require clinical, radiographic and microbiological criteria all be met [2,3]. The significance of NTM-PD is increasing globally, as rates of NTM pulmonary isolation and disease continue to rise [4]. M. avium complex (MAC), slow-growing NTM, and M. abscessus, rapid-growing NTM, are the most common causative agents in NTM-PD [57], both contributing substantially to morbidity and mortality [8,9].

Clinically, NTM-PD is commonly broadly categorised into two distinct clinical phenotypes [3,10]. Fibrocavitary disease involves inflammatory cavitation, progressive scarring and surrounding fibrosis in the lung. It is often seen in middle-aged men with a history of smoking and excessive alcohol consumption, and underlying lung diseases such as past tuberculosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and emphysema [3]. Nodular bronchiectatic NTM-PD is commonly associated with the ‘Lady Windermere’ phenotype [11], characterised by distinct host morphological traits; typically peri- or post-menopausal women, with above average height and lean body habitus, high rates of thoracic deformities (scoliosis and pectus excavatum) and mitral valve prolapse, despite the absence of a shared immune or genetic profile [1214].

Current NTM-PD guideline therapy entails prolonged multidrug regimens and is unacceptably long, usually at least 12–24 months [2]. The causative NTM species, mycobacterial susceptibility to available antibiotics, disease phenotype, patient characteristics and drug tolerability are just some of the many factors that influence the choice and success of NTM-PD therapy [2,15]. Clinical experience indicates that adverse effects from NTM-PD treatment are common, occurring in nearly 40% of patients, irrespective of NTM species [16]. Treatment success, referring to clinical cure, is low at only 40–60% [17,18]. Furthermore, rates of microbiological recurrence and chronically progressive NTM-PD are high, and often represent reinfection rather than relapse [1820]. Given the substantial treatment burden, high incidence of adverse effects, and limited long-term efficacy, there is an urgent need to optimise our understanding of NTM-PD.

In healthy individuals, NTM are eliminated through coordinated innate and adaptive immune responses (Fig 1). Prior reviews have highlighted the complexity of these NTM–host immune-interactions [2125]. However, it must be noted that current understanding of these interactions is commonly derived from models that do not reflect the specific host environments encountered in NTM-PD (such as Drosophila melanogaster [26] or Zebrafish embryo [27]), with knowledge gaps often filled by extrapolation from the more extensive understanding of host defence mechanisms against M. tuberculosis.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Innate and adaptive immune response to NTM infection in the lung.

Alveolar macrophages are integral in the initiation of an immune response against inhaled NTM. This occurs in part through phagocytosis of NTM as well as the release of chemokines and cytokines by alveolar macrophages that recruit additional macrophages and other phagocytes to the site of infection. Macrophage activation by NTM is facilitated by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), of which Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) plays a central role [2831]. Macrophage recognition of NTM initiates phagosome maturation, lysosome acidification and antimicrobial defence mechanisms (e.g., generation of reactive oxygen species, expression of degradative enzymes), facilitating intracellular killing of mycobacteria [32]. Dendritic cells loaded with mycobacterial antigen that migrate to draining lymph nodes present mycobacterial antigens to naïve T cells, thereby facilitating T cell differentiation [33]. The associated cytokine milieu, such as via interleukin (IL)-12 release, shapes T cell differentiation into T helper 1 (Th1) cells. Infected macrophages also present mycobacterial antigens to Th1 cells. Th1 cells, alongside other innate and adaptive lymphocytes, coordinate mycobacteria-restricting immune responses, including interferon (IFN)-γ, tumour necrosing factor (TNF-α), and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-mediated macrophage activation [3437]. Fig 1 created with Biorender.com.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1013603.g001

Susceptibility to NTM infection and NTM-PD is associated with a spectrum of immune dysfunction, ranging from overt primary (e.g., chronic granulomatous disease) or acquired immunodeficiency (e.g., chronic immunosuppressive drug exposure) [14,3840]. However, in immunocompetent hosts, including individuals with the ‘Lady Windermere’ phenotype or underlying chronic lung disease, no single genetic or immunological defect has been identified to account for NTM susceptibility. Instead, we hypothesise that such susceptibility may arise from subtle or combined impairments in immune cell functions. Indeed, persistent NTM infection and/or NTM-PD are associated with reduced absolute counts of adaptive immune cells [41,42], reduced cytokine production (e.g., interleukin (IL)-1, IL-10, IL-18) [43], and/or immune cell exhaustion, suggesting that broader immune dysregulation could underlie susceptibility [12,4347]. Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) is a pattern recognition receptor central to host recognition of MAC [28,30], and M. abscessus [29,31]. In peripheral blood monocytes from NTM-PD patients following MAC stimulation, TLR2 mRNA expression was reduced and cells showed diminished IL-12 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α production [48]. Whether similar findings occur with M. abscessus stimulation remains to be determined. Thus, host susceptibility to NTM-PD appears to be underpinned by subtle and/or combined immune impairments, and the extent and combinations might vary between individuals. Detailed characterisation of immune responses in individuals with known NTM-PD susceptibility, prior to and during NTM infection, is needed to delineate the precise mechanisms underlying susceptibility and to better categorise susceptibility phenotypes in this multifactorial disease.

An important factor in addressing these knowledge gaps is that different NTM species appear to have unique mechanisms to subvert host defence [4951]. For example, MAC replicates and persists intracellularly [49], through disrupting intracellular vesicle trafficking and impairing phagosome maturation [50]. In the context of M. abscessus infection, smooth and rough morphological variants show differential interactions with the immune system [52], where increased virulence of a M. abscessus rough variant was associated with phagosomal escape in macrophages, thereby triggering Type I interferon expression, cell death, and cell-to-cell spread [51]. In a comparison study of MAC-PD and M. abscessus-PD, multiparametric flow cytometry analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells indicated NTM-species-specific immune checkpoint marker ‘fingerprints’ in the host response: MAC-PD was associated with high T cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain-containing protein 3 (TIM-3) expression by T cells; M. abscessus-PD was associated with high cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA4) expression by CD4+ T cells (especially T-regulatory cells) [44]. Thus, characterisation of NTM-PD-associated host susceptibility will require consideration of the NTM species, strains, and morphotype.

The microbiome in health and disease

The microbiome is increasingly recognised as a dynamic and influential modulator of health and disease. Broadly, the term “microbiome” refers to the genomic composition and diversity of a microbial community (i.e., the microbiota) and how that might be affected by the physicochemical properties of its surrounding environment (biome) at the time of sampling [53]. The prevailing view is that the microbiota associated with an individual outnumbers the absolute count of human somatic and germ cells by a factor of ten [54]. Accordingly, the collective DNA content of the microbiota, known as the metagenome, is phylogenetically more variable and dynamic compared to the relatively stable human genome [55,56]. Microbiome composition is influenced by physicochemical factors (such as oxygen and moisture levels, pH, and nutritional ecology), host-derived factors (including immune responses and genetics), and environmental or lifestyle factors (birth-delivery mode, breast- or formula-feeding, dietary pattern, exercise and exposure to antibiotics/medication) [55,57,58]. As such, differences in the relative abundance of microbial species and community composition lead to dynamic and variable microbiotas at different anatomical sites, even among healthy individuals [59]. Measures of the taxonomic diversity and relative abundance of the microbiota recovered from different body sites are often reported; based principally on case-control and/or cohort studies [60,61]. Reductions in these measures are commonly referred to as a dysbiosis, which often, but not always, is associated with disease [61]. There may be patterns that characterise disease-associated dysbiosis with some shared microbiome changes across different diseases, whilst other changes may be disease-specific [60]. Some diseases are associated with the presence of pathogenic microbes in the microbiota whereas others are characterised by a relative reduction in microbes associated with health [60]. Indeed, although microbiome research generally suggests that susceptibility to and/or pathophysiology of various diseases may be associated with taxonomic variations in the microbiome, there is consensus that the concept of a ‘healthy’ microbiome lacks a universal definition and objective criteria [54,55,62].

The lung microbiota: Could it be more stable in respiratory disease states than in health?

The lungs were historically believed to be sterile, but it is now established that the lungs host a resident microbiota distinct from the oropharynx [63,64]. Distal airways may have lower microbial richness and the right upper lobe is suggested to most closely resemble the oral cavity [64], therefore supporting the concept that the lung microbiota may be continually recolonised by microbes from adjacent sites and the environment through microaspiration and breathing [65,66]. Dickson and colleagues [67] propose that microbial composition in the airways is governed by a dynamic balance of three key factors; microbial immigration, microbial elimination and regional growth conditions. In the context of lung pathologies, it is hypothesised that alterations in the local airway environment, be it structural, immunological or metabolic, create conditions more conducive to bacterial proliferation, whereby microbial growth may surpass the airways’ capacity for elimination, this can result in persistent microbial colonisation and dysbiosis [67,68]. The relationship between the lung microbiota and respiratory diseases has been previously reviewed in the literature [69,70], and is relatively well-characterised in several chronic respiratory diseases that are associated with the development of NTM-PD. Shifts in microbial composition and the presence of certain taxa have been observed when comparing acute exacerbation states to clinically stable periods in COPD [71] and bronchiectasis [72]. These exacerbations are typically marked by reduced microbial diversity, associated with overgrowth of clinically significant pathogens such as Pseudomonas (P.) aeruginosa or Haemophilus influenzae [71]. A similar reduction in diversity is seen in cystic fibrosis patients chronically, but not intermittently, colonised by P. aeruginosa [73]. This pattern of dysbiosis, and the persistent dominance of certain taxa, may contribute to disease progression, supporting the hypothesis that the lung microbiota in respiratory disease is more stable and enduring than in health [65].

At the intersection of the lung microbiota and host susceptibility in NTM-PD

While environmental factors (e.g., temperature, rainfall) may influence the nature and degree of exposure to NTM [5], most individuals are able to control and eliminate NTM upon exposure. In cases where NTM infection can occur and progress to NTM-PD, underlying host susceptibility is multifactorial and multigenic [74,75]. At present, linking specific immune susceptibility factors to the microbiota in NTM-PD remains challenging, as we do not understand the varying combinations of subtle immune defects that may underlie susceptibility in different individuals. Broadly; however, immune dysfunction may contribute to pulmonary dysbiosis by impairing microbial clearance, allowing microbial expansion and promoting disease pathogenesis. In the following section, we examine the potential interplay between the lung microbiota, and two key susceptibility factors, impaired mucociliary clearance and microaspiration (see Fig 2), which are thought to predispose NTM infection and disease, and are also implicated in several chronic pulmonary conditions commonly associated with NTM-PD.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Model of host susceptibility factors driving lung and gut dysbiosis in NTM-PD.

The model is divided into two key categories of susceptible individuals: the ‘Lady Windermere’ phenotype and chronic lung disease. These categories are not mutually exclusive, and some individuals may exhibit features of both (or in fact neither). Common to both lies airway damage, impaired mucociliary clearance, and mucus stasis, which may promote niche colonisation by NTM or other pathogens, leading to recurrent infections and often requiring antibiotic use. This, in turn, may cause further dysbiosis in the lung and perturb the gut microbiota (see Fig 3). Fig 2 created with Biorender.com.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1013603.g002

Mucociliary dysfunction and mucus stasis: Creating niches for lung dysbiosis in NTM-PD.

The mucosal interface [76] and mucociliary clearance play a crucial role in airway immune defence, as ciliary motion coordinates transport of microorganisms and inhaled particles out of the respiratory tract [77]. Bronchiectasis [78,79], COPD [80,81], and primary ciliary dyskinesia [79,82], are all diseases associated with both impaired mucociliary clearance, and increased risk of NTM colonisation, infection and disease. NTM infection is also common in individuals living with cystic fibrosis [83], and even without overt cystic fibrosis disease, cystic fibrosis transmembrane receptor (CFTR) mutations are frequently observed in individuals with NTM-PD [13,84]. In the absence of concurrent underlying lung conditions, primary respiratory epithelial cells isolated from individuals with NTM-PD (including MAC and M. abscessus) showed abnormally low resting ciliary beat function compared to healthy controls [85]. Additionally, transcriptomic analysis of normal primary human bronchial epithelial cells infected with either MAC or M. abscessus revealed downregulation of genes associated with ciliary function. This suggests a potential mechanism by which NTM infection itself may impair mucociliary clearance in the respiratory epithelium, in the absence of other known risk factors that enhance susceptibility to NTM-PD [86]. Thus, in the presence or absence of pulmonary co-morbidities, impaired mucociliary clearance is a common susceptibility factor that may underlie NTM-PD.

Impaired mucociliary clearance and increased mucus production in respiratory disease can result in mucus stasis and hyper-concentrated mucus within the airways [8789]. Mucus stasis can create a localised niche with altered environmental conditions, such as hypoxic gradients [90] and changes in nutrient availability [91], which may alter host–pathogen interactions [92], and propagate bacterial colonisation [93,94]. The precise nature and dynamics of these localised niches, including how different environmental, host, and disease factors interact still needs to be investigated, and will likely vary between diseases, so should be considered in NTM-PD. We hypothesise a similar mechanism within cavities in NTM-PD, where the cavity could serve as a localised niche that allows bacterial proliferation. One recent study found that disease-involved sites in the fibrocavitary form of NTM-PD harboured more dominant bacterial genera and a higher proportion of Mycobacterium compared to the nodular bronchiectatic NTM-PD group [95]. These findings cautiously suggest that the mycobacterial burden may be higher in the fibrocavitary form, however, further research is needed to understand the dynamics of microbial communities within NTM-PD cavities. Research on mucociliary clearance and mucus stasis has thus far primarily focussed on cystic fibrosis, and indeed, the recent successful introduction of CFTR modulators that confer a significant improvement in mucociliary clearance [96] are likely, at least in part, responsible for the reduction of lung infections by key cystic fibrosis pathogens [97], including NTM infections [98]. We propose that in NTM-PD, impaired mucociliary clearance affects the microbiome’s composition and this enables susceptibility to colonisation by NTM. This colonisation by NTM species could then drive further lung microbiota dysbiosis and persistent inflammation. The interaction between lung dysbiosis, mucociliary clearance and NTM-PD warrants further study. 

Microaspiration silently driving lung dysbiosis in NTM-PD.

Microaspiration occurs due to the contiguous nature of the oropharyngeal and tracheobronchial tree and represents a direct connection between the microbial communities in the gut and lung. Longitudinal analysis of paired gut and lung microbiota samples in infants has shown that several bacterial taxa appear in the gut prior to detection in the lung, supporting the concept of a direct microbial connection between these sites [99]. Even in health, microaspiration-mediated enrichment of oral commensals in the lung microbiota has been shown to modulate pulmonary cellular immune responses, with evidence of a pro-inflammatory phenotype reflected by upregulation of inflammatory cytokines [100]. Microaspiration may be more prevalent in individuals with chronic lung diseases. In an observational study investigating the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, increased oesophageal acid exposure was observed in 37% of COPD patients, 40% of bronchiectasis patients and only 18% of controls [101]. In NTM-PD (MAC-PD and M. abscessus-PD), increased oesophageal acid exposure was reported in 26% of a nodular bronchiectatic cohort [102] and another study reported micro-aspiration in 87% of NTM-PD patients [103]. Whilst microaspiration often remains clinically silent (e.g., 70% of individuals in a cohort with nodular bronchiectatic disease [102]), we hypothesise it is nonetheless relevant and may contribute to lung dysbiosis through multiple mechanisms. Firstly, increased microaspiration associated with disease states may enhance the influx of non-resident microbial taxa into the lower respiratory tract, disrupting the equilibrium between microbial immigration and elimination. Such disturbances are likely to alter local ecological conditions and may promote colonisation by opportunistic species. For example, in a cohort of 47 individuals clinically suspected of having NTM-PD, those with reflux exhibited significantly reduced diversity of the microbiota in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), driven by predominance of select taxa such as P. aeruginosa, compared to the non-reflux group [104]. Secondly, microaspiration may be linked to impaired mucociliary clearance, as microaspiration models of cultured human primary bronchial epithelial cells show cell damage and death when exposed to bile acids [105]. Additionally, bile acid may directly influence microbial behaviour in the lung. For example, exposure to bile acids has been shown to induce biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa isolated from cystic fibrosis patients in vitro [106]. In vivo, bile acid aspiration in people with cystic fibrosis was associated with increased colonisation by P. aeruginosa and upregulation of genes linked to chronic biofilm formation in sputum microbiota [107]. This biofilm formation was also linked to increased antibiotic tolerance, including macrolides. Therefore, microaspiration may contribute to dysbiosis in lung diseases such as NTM-PD and also interfere with our ability to treat disease, either directly by facilitating microbial immigration into the airway, or indirectly by inducing airway damage that could impair mucociliary clearance.

We postulate that microaspiration in NTM-PD may be associated with connective tissue-related gene variants, which were identified in 90% of individuals in a cohort of 69 NTM-PD patients [75]. Ninety-nine specific genes involved in the structure and regulation of connective tissue were included in this study. The affected genes span several categories critical for connective tissue integrity and function, including collagen genes (e.g., COLA1), proteoglycan genes (e.g., ACAN), matrix and regulatory genes (e.g., ADAMTS2 for collagen processing), and signalling pathway genes involved in connective tissue maintenance and repair (e.g., TGFB2). Although this cohort was not stratified by radiological phenotype, 72% exhibited connective tissue features (scoliosis, mitral valve prolapse, pectus excavatum and/or joint hypermobility), suggesting that a substantial proportion may belong to the ‘Lady Windermere’ phenotype. This phenotype, as discussed, is characterised by ‘Marfanoid’ features and overlaps with connective tissue disease traits [1214]. Notably, nodular bronchiectasis appears to be relatively common in individuals with Marfan syndrome [108], and both bronchiectasis and pulmonary NTM infections have been reported in those with Marfan and other heritable connective tissue disorders [109]. These observations suggest a possible link between connective tissue disease abnormalities or traits, oesophageal dysmotility and increased microaspiration, which may be particularly relevant to the nodular bronchiectatic or ‘Lady Windermere’ phenotype. Further studies are needed to clarify the functional impact of these variants and their role in disease.

The gut–lung axis

Beyond direct anatomical connections such as in microaspiration, spatially distinct microbial communities do not operate as isolated populations. The lung environment and its associated microbiota are influenced by, and involved in complex interactions, including via the gut-lung axis. The gut-lung axis (GLA) describes the concept of the complex bidirectional microbiome–host interactions at each anatomical site, the gut and lungs, and the connectedness between these sites [65,66,68]. Microbial structural components and metabolic outputs from microbes possess immunomodulatory properties and can disperse via the bloodstream and lymphatic circulation, facilitating inter-niche communication that is fundamental in maintaining homeostasis and regulating host immune responses [110112]. Fig 3 summarises the proposed roles of GLA in NTM-PD.

thumbnail
Fig 3. A working model of the gut-lung axis (GLA) in nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD).

The gut and lung have specialised microbiotas that are interconnected via the bloodstream and lymphatic system, via the GLA [65,68]. We propose gut microbiota dysbiosis as a potential initiating factor in the cycle of NTM-PD; however, whether it represents a cause or consequence of disease remains unclear. Dysbiosis contributes to changes in migrating immune cells, microbial immunomodulatory components and immune mediators, together representing a level of systemic immune dysregulation that affects the lung microbiota via the GLA [110112]. Microaspiration and reflux are also implicated in the GLA and respiratory disease pathophysiology with a degree of direct seeding of gut microbes into the airways [99,104]. Lung microbiota dysbiosis may then cause lung injury and inflammation, contributing to poor clearance of NTM infection, allowing establishment of disease. Antibiotic treatment for NTM-PD then causes further dysbiosis of both the gut and lung microbiotas [61,113,114], so the cycle continues. Fig 3 created with Biorender.com.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1013603.g003

The gut microbiome, particularly within the distal (ileocolonic) regions of the gastrointestinal tract, has been extensively reviewed for its contributions to the development and regulation of peripheral immune functions, including in the lung [65,115,116]. Emerging evidence suggests that while the gut microbiota can be protective against respiratory infections [112], gut dysbiosis can impair immune tolerance and contribute to inflammation. Gut dysbiosis has been associated with manifestations and exacerbations in various respiratory disease contexts [117,118]. For example, in a murine model, reduced gut microbial diversity increased mortality from respiratory viral infection by disrupting regulatory T cell balance and elevating pro-inflammatory cytokines [119]. In COPD, faecal microbiota profiles were characterised by a Prevotella-dominated enterotype with reduced levels of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs); faecal microbiota transplantation from these patients into mice induced ‘COPD-like’ lung inflammation and accelerated disease progression [120]. SCFAs such as acetate, propionate and butyrate, are produced in the gut as by-products of bacterial anaerobic fermentation of dietary fibre [121]. Their diverse physiological roles and implications for human health and disease were recently reviewed by Mukhopadhya and colleagues [122], including their regulation of local gut immune responses and their systemic immunomodulatory effects [110,111]. Altered SCFA metabolism has been identified in pulmonary diseases, with reduced abundance of SCFA-producing bacteria and/or decreased production of SCFAs reported in patients with bronchiectasis [123], active tuberculosis (TB) [124], and COPD [125]. To our knowledge, assessments on SCFA-focussed analyses in NTM-PD have not yet been reported. Such analyses, paired with immune profiling in gut and lung tissue microenvironments, would be highly valuable in determining whether altered SCFA metabolism contributes to NTM-PD and how it may influence the immune response to NTM.

One metabolite which has been examined in the context of NTM-PD is L-arginine, an amino acid obtained through dietary intake, but also synthesised endogenously, as well as produced by gut microbes. L-arginine is proposed to have roles within multiple metabolic pathways and to shape immune functions [126128]. Kim and colleagues [129] reported decreased L-arginine in serum of M. abscessus-PD patients as well as in M. abscessus-infected mice. Oral administration of L-arginine to mice infected with M. abscessus was associated with remodelling of the gut microbiota, and a reduction in pulmonary NTM burden and amelioration of lung histopathology. Transcriptomic profiling of the lung tissues revealed elevated expression of interferon (IFN)-γ and IL-12 in these M. abscessus-infected mice treated with L-arginine, suggesting enhanced Th1-mediated pulmonary immune responses. This example highlights how gut microbial alterations via microbe-derived metabolites might influence immune responses and disease severity in the lungs. However, further research is needed to establish whether there is a causal relationship between L-arginine-induced changes in the microbiota and enhanced pulmonary defence, especially as current evidence is derived from murine-infected mice and may not fully translate to humans. Additionally, L-arginine may also exert effects through other mechanisms, such as increasing nitric oxide synthase activity [130], which is known to have antimicrobial properties against mycobacteria [131,132]. To define the specific roles of microbe-derived metabolites and better understand the mechanisms contributing to the GLA in NTM-PD, more detailed characterisation of the microbiota and their functional capabilities in this condition is required.

Section II: Insights into the lung and gut microbiotas from studies in NTM-PD

Challenges in the lung microbiota in NTM-PD: the need for disease stratification and methodological consistency

Variations in the lung microbiota are inconsistent across studies examining NTM infection and NTM-PD. Of note, there has been a transition in the field from culture-dependent to culture-independent methods of microbiota analysis. As culture-independent methods of surveying the microbiota are less affected by the biases introduced by culturing, we focussed our assessment on studies based on culture-independent analyses (details of studies outlined in Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Summary table of culture-independent studies characterising the impact of NTM infection or NTM-PD on the lung microbiota.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1013603.t001

To date, there is no clear consensus on whether NTM infection or NTM-PD is consistently associated with changes in microbial diversity. Some studies report no change in diversity [133136], others observe a decrease [137140], and few report an increase [95,141,142]. One hypothesis is that microbial diversity remains stable during transient infection, but declines with disease progression. This pattern mirrors observations in chronic P. aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis, where diversity declines only once chronic infection is established [73]. However, testing this hypothesis in NTM-PD is challenging due to the difficulty in distinguishing transient NTM infection from true NTM-PD in some individuals. Sulaiman and colleagues [133] found no difference in diversity between NTM-positive and NTM-negative bronchiectasis samples. However, all participants in this study exhibited respiratory symptoms and imaging abnormalities suggestive of NTM-PD, making it difficult to determine whether they were transiently infected or had established disease. Alternatively, the similar diversity observed between groups could reflect a shared underlying lung pathology, namely bronchiectasis. No difference in diversity was also observed in a study by Song and colleagues [135], which compared stable NTM-PD and progressive NTM-PD cases (those requiring treatment). This similarity could reflect that both groups had established disease, and that difference might only emerge when compared to transient infection—a group not included in the study. Future research would benefit from longitudinal studies that can track changes in the lung microbiota from transient infection through to established NTM-PD and progressive NTM-PD. One such study involving cystic fibrosis patients with NTM infection or NTM-PD, although not reporting specific diversity metrics, identified distinct differences in microbial network clustering between transient NTM infection and persistent NTM-PD [143]. The networks suggested that microbial communities in persistent NTM-PD were more interconnected and less modular, indicating reduced community stability in disease. Although not all individuals with NTM-PD follow a trajectory from transient infection to progressive disease, such analyses may offer valuable insights into the relationship between lung microbiota dynamics and disease progression.

In studies reporting decreased diversity, overgrowth of specific taxa is often observed. For instance, in a bronchiectasis cohort, NTM-positive individuals exhibited significantly reduced diversity compared to NTM-negative counterparts, with overrepresentation of Mycobacterium, Pseudomonas, Veillonella, Actinomyces, and Fusobacterium [138]. Similarly, decreased diversity in an NTM-PD cohort compared to controls was observed alongside overgrowth of Pseudomonas and Rhodococcus [139]. These findings align with observations in other chronic lung diseases, where reduced microbial diversity is seen in established disease and often driven by the dominance of specific taxa [71,73,144]. Of the studies reporting increased microbial diversity associated with NTM-PD, one was a pilot study significantly limited by sample size [141], the other provides a paired analysis of disease-involved segments compared to non-involved segments in resected lung specimens from individuals with NTM-PD [95]. It is possible that in advanced NTM-PD (such as cases requiring surgical resection) microbial diversity increases as the disease progresses, potentially due to invasion by other bacterial species or immune exhaustion. To better understand these dynamics, further research is needed to quantify changes in microbial diversity across the spectrum of NTM-PD severity.

Specific microbial taxa have been proposed as potential biomarkers for distinct disease characteristics in NTM-PD; however, substantial variability between studies limits the identification of consistent markers and their clinical applicability. Nevertheless, some patterns may be beginning to emerge. Anaerobic genera such as Veillonella [137,138,143,145], Fusobacterium [138,145], and Prevotella [145] are frequently reported at higher relative abundance in individuals with NTM infection or NTM-PD compared to healthy controls or those with NTM-negative bronchiectasis. These same taxa are among the most common in health and other chronic respiratory diseases [63,146], suggesting their presence is not NTM-PD specific. Whether the increased abundance of these anaerobic microbes could relate to changes in the airway microenvironment in individuals with NTM-PD, such as the development of hypoxic niches driven by mucus stasis [90], could be a future research question. The potential for sputum microbiota biomarkers to distinguish between disease progression and stability in NTM-PD has also been suggested, but findings remain inconsistent and unvalidated. For instance, Prevotella nanceiensis was found in one study as a marker of NTM-PD stability [135], while another study constructed a predictive model for NTM-PD progression using seven genera (Burkholderia, Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas, Candidatus, Saccharibacteria, Phocaeicola, Pelomonas and Phascolarctobacterium) [140]. Among these genera, Pseudomonas is frequently reported, albeit inconsistently. Pseudomonas abundance was increased in a study in NTM infection [138] and a study in NTM-PD [139], yet another study found it absent in all MAC-PD samples, with authors proposing a possible mutual exclusivity between Pseudomonas and MAC in the lung environment [134]. While such biomarkers may hold promise for future disease monitoring, the variability across studies currently limits the development of robust predictive models or biomarkers for disease progression.

We purport that the variability in findings and absence of a distinct microbial profile compared to healthy lungs reflects methodological heterogeneity rather than the absence of a disease-associated microbiota in NTM-PD. Most studies have included varying proportions of different species within their NTM-PD cohorts [95,133,135,137139,142,145], primarily MAC and M. abscessus, but also some with smaller percentages with less commonly seen pathogens in NTM-PD such as M. xenopi and M. lentiflavum (specific percentages for each study are detailed in Table 1). Few studies have focussed on a single species, specifically MAC-PD [134,141], or M. abscessus NTM-PD [136]. This lack of species-specific focus is problematic, as data suggests differential taxa enrichment in lung tissue microbiota depending on NTM causative species (MAC vs M. abscessus) [95], and even potential differences in sputum diversity and taxonomy based on subspecies of M. abscessus (massiliense versus abscessus) [136]. Future studies should, at a minimum, ensure species-level consistency within NTM-PD groups, with consideration given to subspecies-level distinctions as well. Similarly, there may be differences in microbiota composition associated with radiographic phenotype (fibrocavitary versus nodular bronchiectatic) [95]. However, most studies have neither stratified participants by phenotype nor consistently reported it. Incorporating radiographic phenotype into future analyses may help clarify microbiota-disease associations and improve the interpretability.

Inconsistencies in the types of respiratory samples used to assess the lung microbiota in NTM-PD significantly hinder cross-study comparisons. Sputum samples are widely used in clinical and research settings due to their ease of collection and capacity to capture a broad range of microbial genera present in the lungs. Comparative analyses have shown that bronchoscopy does not yield additional genera beyond those identified in sputum samples [147]. Nevertheless, sputum represents a surrogate measure of the lower respiratory tract, as it comprises a composite of mucus from the lower respiratory tract and aqueous secretions from the oral cavity acquired during transit through the upper airway. This passage introduces contamination from oropharyngeal sources [147,148], which can confound interpretations of microbial composition. Studies comparing sputum with BALF and protected specimen brushings [147], and comparing sputum with direct lung sampling acquired at the time of transplantation [148], both in cystic fibrosis patients, reported significant differences in both microbial diversity and relative abundance, underscoring the limitations of sputum as a proxy for the lung microbiota. Similarly, a comparison of diversity and bacterial load in a subset of bronchiectasis patients, both NTM-positive and NTM-negative, suggested sputum microbial composition more closely resembled that of the oral cavity than BALF samples [133]. Other sampling techniques may be less affected by contamination. Intraindividual inter-site analysis in healthy individuals suggests BALF is not confounded by contamination from the oral microbiota [63]. Protected sampling methods, particularly protected specimen brushings (PSB), have also been shown to reduce oral contamination, potentially yielding even greater distinction from oral microbiota than other bronchoscopic techniques [149]. In NTM-PD, there were discrepancies when comparing protected specimen brushing and bronchial washing samples, with lower diversity in protected specimen brushings [139]. The lung microbiota is likely more accurately characterised using bronchoscopic samples than sputum samples, however, the clinical risks, invasiveness, and time-consuming nature of bronchoscopy limit its routine use. Nevertheless, to characterise the lung microbiota in NTM-PD, future studies require greater methodological consistency to allow for better comparison across the literature.

The gut microbiota in NTM-PD: many questions to be answered

Gut microbiota dysbiosis has been associated with pulmonary disorders, such as COPD [117], bronchiectasis [123], and cystic fibrosis [150], but specific studies of gut-associated dysbiosis in NTM-PD are limited. To date, three studies have reported on the faecal microbiota in NTM-PD patients [details in Table 2] [136,137,151].

thumbnail
Table 2. Summary table of studies characterising the faecal microbiota in NTM-PD.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1013603.t002

Gut microbiota profiles may differ between individuals with NTM-PD (who are treatment naïve) when compared to healthy controls. Choi and colleagues [137] and Lin and colleagues [151] reported significantly decreased diversity measures in faecal microbial profiles of individuals with NTM-PD compared to healthy controls. Both studies included relatively small sample numbers and were unable to stratify by NTM-PD phenotype, causative NTM species, or disease severity. Broadly, the observed decrease in diversity in NTM-PD, corresponds with the decrease in diversity seen in other infectious [124,152] and non-infectious lung pathologies [123]. Changes in taxonomy; however, were not consistent across the two NTM-PD studies despite both using linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) to compare taxa abundances between groups and to determine statistically significant biomarkers [137,151]. Both studies identified that members of the genus Prevotella were altered in NTM-PD patients [137,151]. However, Choi and colleagues [137] reported that Prevotella fusca, P. marshii, and P. nanceiensis were predominant in NTM-PD subjects, whereas Lin and colleagues [151] saw reductions in the relative abundance of Prevotella_9 in NTM-PD patients. Species of the genus Prevotella synthesise SCFAs [153], which might offer potential focus for future studies to integrate microbial taxonomy and their metabolic capabilities in NTM-PD. The variable findings related to Prevotella may arise from inconsistent definitions of a ’healthy’ control population, which are rarely reported in microbiota studies. We propose that the most appropriate matched control would be individuals with similar underlying host phenotype and lung disease, but without NTM infection, recent antibiotic exposure, or other significant co-morbidities that may be affecting the microbiome. Identifying such controls is challenging, so studies may benefit from multiple comparison groups. Greater confidence in characterising NTM-PD-associated gut dysbiosis at the genus or species level will also require larger patient and control cohorts, and more detailed consideration of clinical parameters including, but not limited to, NTM causative species, disease severity and concomitant diseases or infections.

Gut microbiota profiles may also be related to disease severity measures or disease exacerbation. Decreased gut microbiota diversity and richness has been seen in acute exacerbations of COPD compared to stable disease [144], and in acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis compared to stable bronchiectatic disease [123]. In NTM-PD, Lin and colleagues [151] found that 11 bacterial genera had significantly different abundance compared to a healthy control groups. These 11 genera were correlated with NTM-PD disease severity measures, including the presence of a cavity, grading of sputum acid-fast smear and radiographic scores [151]. The strongest correlation was observed between greater disease severity and reduced levels of the Prevotella_9 genus [151]. Prevotella again emerges as a possible genus of interest, with potential relevance to NTM-PD severity. These findings warrant validation in larger, well-characterised NTM-PD cohorts. Further research should explore whether Prevotella, or other taxa, could serve as biomarkers of NTM-PD progression, and whether associated microbial shifts reflect changes in host metabolism, such as altered SCFA synthesis.

Antibiotic treatment and the gut microbiota in NTM-PD

Antibiotic treatment causes significant disruption of the gut microbiota, affecting both composition and abundance to varying degrees [61,114]. Antibiotics have different modes of action, and may selectively deplete specific subpopulations of microbes [154156]. Even antibiotics from the same class can induce different and specific effects on the microbiota [157]. Specific drug, route, spectrum and concurrent disease [113,157], as well as interactions with other non-antibiotic medication and polypharmacy [158], are just some of the factors that make the impact of antibiotic treatment highly individualised and complex.

Suggested treatment for nodular-bronchiectatic MAC-PD, is a 3-drug regimen including a macrolide (e.g., azithromycin, ethambutol and rifampicin), with intravenous amikacin commonly prescribed in addition to the 3-drugs for cavitary, severe or refractory disease [2,15]. Treatment for M. abscessus-PD is more complex and variable than that for MAC-PD. The optimal drugs, regimens and duration for treatment of M. abscessus-PD are not pre-defined, and rather antibiotic choices are informed by mutational or inducible macrolide resistance patterns [2]. Given the substantial antibiotic burden, we hypothesise that NTM-PD therapy induces significant gut dysbiosis.

Inference of the impact of commonly used antibiotics in disease contexts other than NTM-PD may provide first insights. However, of the drugs used in NTM-PD treatment, to date, there is only information on azithromycin used independently. Azithromycin exposure has been associated with a significant decrease in gut microbial diversity in other disease contexts [155,157,159], and has been negatively correlated with presence of Actinobacteria [155,159] and Bifidobacterium [157,159]. These changes in microbial diversity and taxonomy are consistent with the broad-spectrum activity of azithromycin. In the context of the GLA and its role in NTM-PD, it is important to consider that antibiotic-associated microbial dysbiosis has been linked to downstream metabolic and immunological changes that may cause or exacerbate disease [155,157,160]. Metabolically, azithromycin exposure in healthy individuals resulted in Bifidobacterium depletion which was associated with increases in C-peptide, leading to reduced microbiota-associated glucose metabolism and reduced SCFA biosynthesis [157]. The same study identified azithromycin exposure was correlated with a significant decrease in serum pro-inflammatory cytokines, specifically monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 and IL-5 in healthy individuals [157]. Azithromycin has also been reported to attenuate airway inflammation and reduce inflammatory markers in an allergic asthma mouse model [161], as well as to exert anti-inflammatory effects in the lungs of humans with asthma [162]. While these studies suggest possible azithromycin-induced perturbations, the extent, nature, and downstream inflammatory effects of these changes must be independently and thoroughly investigated in NTM-PD, as the impact of antibiotic perturbations may differ across disease states. For example, in bronchiectasis patients treated with erythromycin (which has a similar mechanism of action to azithromycin), significant alterations in microbiota composition were only observed in individuals who did not have an airway infection dominated by P. aeruginosa [113]. We hypothesise that similar variability could exist between NTM species, highlighting the need for future studies to examine both drug and species-specific effects on the microbiota. Further research is needed to clarify how azithromycin and other antibiotics used in NTM-PD, both individually and as multi-drug therapy, affect the gut microbiota. The impact of antibiotic treatment on the lung microbiota remains underexplored, both in respiratory diseases and NTM-PD, despite evidence suggesting microbial disruption [113]. Investigating antibiotic effects on both the gut and lung microbiotas, and their potential cross-talk via the GLA, may offer valuable insights into NTM-PD pathophysiology.

To our knowledge, there is one study to date that documents the impact of antibiotic treatment on the gut microbiota in NTM-PD; a study in 27 M. abscessus-PD patients with faecal microbiota analysed at baseline, 2 weeks and 6 months of antibiotic treatment (25 of 27 patients on a treatment regimen of azithromycin + amikacin + imipenem/cefoxitin ± clofazimine) [136]. This study provides a clinically relevant perspective by comparing microbiota signatures of M. abcessus-PD patients who are treatment-‘responders’ (defined as negative mycobacterial sputum culture at 2 weeks of treatment) to ‘non-responders’ (persistent positive mycobacterial culture at 2 weeks) [136]. The ‘responders’ group showed a significant decrease from pre-treatment baseline faecal microbiota diversity by 2 weeks of antibiotic treatment, and were found to have increased Enteroccocus abundance at week 2 [136]. ‘Non-responders’ displayed relative stability in diversity from pre-treatment to 2 weeks and continuing stability at 6 months of antibiotic treatment [136]. Diversity measures at 2 weeks and 6 months were significantly lower in the ‘responders’ group than ‘non-responders’ group [136]. ‘Non-responders’ were also found to have increased abundance of Eubacterium hallii group at baseline compared to ‘responders’ [136]. Given the long duration of NTM-PD treatment [2,3,163], determining treatment-responsiveness at 2 weeks is relatively early. However, 14 of the 15 treatment-responders at 2 weeks remained culture negative at 6 months and only four patients displayed a different outcome at 6 months compared to 2 weeks [136]. As the antibiotic regimens in the two patient groups were not significantly different, it was hypothesised that non-responders may have a host-dependent mechanism underlying their treatment unresponsiveness and relatively stable gut microbiota diversity [136]. These observations encourage future studies to assess whether relative stability of microbial diversity following commencement of treatment could be an early indicator for treatment non-responsiveness, or whether taxonomic biomarkers, such as Enteroccocus abundance or Eubacterium hallii group may predict a patient’s favourable or unsuccessful antibiotic treatment outcome. Such early indicators would hold great potential for early stratification of patients to pursue alternative treatment options. Given the gut microbiota’s potential influence on antibiotic pharmacokinetics, the cyclical relationship between the microbiota and treatment responsiveness may benefit from therapeutic drug monitoring alongside microbiota composition analysis in the future. Differences between M. abscessus subspecies (massiliense or abscessus) [136] and extension to other NTM-PD causative organisms [137,151] should also be considered, to assess potential for universal, early biomarkers of NTM treatment success or failure.

Recovery dynamics following antibiotic treatment—beyond the immediate perturbation—are crucial, as prior antibiotic exposure may influence susceptibility to future infections [154]. Initial and long-term dysbiosis post-treatment cessation depends on the degree of perturbation, the breadth of spectrum of antibiotics, microbial resistance, and the capacity of the microbiota to re-establish equilibrium following perturbation [164]. Reduction in microbial diversity can favour re-colonisation with antibiotic-resistant pathogens [160]. Recovery rates following antibiotic treatment in other diseases are highly variable, from as little as a few weeks, to persistent perturbation up to 14 months post cessation of antibiotic treatment [165,166]. In NTM-PD, studies to date have not addressed long-term gut microbiota composition following treatment. This research will be complicated by the high rates of co-infection with respiratory pathogens in individuals with NTM-PD [167,168]. Antibiotic treatment of these co-infections may cause dysbiosis, a factor that warrants consideration in both research and clinical settings. We hypothesise that the high rates of reinfection and recurrence of disease in NTM-PD may relate, at least in part, to the dysbiosis associated with long-term antibiotic use. Understanding the impact of both NTM-PD-specific antibiotic therapy and treatment for respiratory co-infections on the microbiome is essential, including how the microbiome recovers post-treatment and how these recovery dynamics may influence the risk of relapse or reinfection.

Conclusions

The microbiome undoubtedly plays a role in health, infection and disease; however substantial knowledge gaps remain regarding its interaction with NTM-PD. It has the potential to influence multiple aspects of the disease, including susceptibility, progression, treatment response, and reinfection or relapse. Host susceptibility factors such as impaired mucociliary clearance and microaspiration, commonly observed in NTM-PD patients, may contribute to microbiota disruption, indicating a plausible link between physiological vulnerability and dysbiosis.

Given the growing recognition of the GLA in other respiratory diseases, investigations into both the gut and lung microbiota may offer valuable insights into the pathophysiology of NTM-PD. To date, studies on the lung microbiota in NTM-PD have been limited with inconsistent findings, likely due to methodological variability. Even fewer studies have examined the gut microbiota in NTM-PD. Further research is needed to characterise potential gut dysbiosis and to investigate how gut microbiota composition interacts with immune responses, the lung microbiota and the overall control of NTM-PD. Future microbiota studies, both in the gut and lung, should endeavour to incorporate larger and better-stratified cohorts, with careful consideration of factors such as causative NTM species, disease severity and radiographic phenotype, and exacerbation states. These variables are essential for improving resolution and interpretability of microbiome data in the context of NTM-PD.

There is a clear need, not just in the context of NTM-PD, to develop a better understanding of the short and longer-term effects of antibiotics on microbial communities at different anatomical sites. Given the individual nature of antibiotic–microbiome interactions, targeted investigation into the effects of drugs and treatment regimens used for NTM-PD and their impact on microbiome recovery is urgently needed.

Ultimately, the gut and lung microbiotas may hold key insights into the mechanisms underpinning the complex nature of NTM-PD. A deeper understanding of microbial dynamics and host responses across these sites could help determine whether microbiome manipulation might prevent disease development and progression, minimise the adverse impact of antibiotic therapy, support post-treatment recovery, and reduce the risk of relapse or reinfection. Such insights have the potential to transform the clinical management of this challenging disease.

References

  1. 1. Koh W-J. Nontuberculous mycobacteria-overview. Microbiol Spectr. 2017;5(1): pmid:28128073
  2. 2. Daley CL, Iaccarino JM, Lange C, Cambau E, Wallace RJ, Andrejak C. Treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: an official ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA clinical practice guideline. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2020;71(4):e1–36.
  3. 3. Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott BA, Catanzaro A, Daley C, Gordin F, et al. An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175(4):367–416.
  4. 4. Prevots DR, Marshall JE, Wagner D, Morimoto K. Global epidemiology of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: a review. Clin Chest Med. 2023;44(4):675–721.
  5. 5. Thomson RM, Furuya-Kanamori L, Coffey C, Bell SC, Knibbs LD, Lau CL. Influence of climate variables on the rising incidence of nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infections in Queensland, Australia 2001-2016. Sci Total Environ. 2020;740:139796. pmid:32563864
  6. 6. Tan Y, Su B, Shu W, Cai X, Kuang S, Kuang H, et al. Epidemiology of pulmonary disease due to nontuberculous mycobacteria in Southern China, 2013-2016. BMC Pulm Med. 2018;18(1):168. pmid:30413193
  7. 7. Lim AYH, Chotirmall SH, Fok ETK, Verma A, De PP, Goh SK, et al. Profiling non-tuberculous mycobacteria in an Asian setting: characteristics and clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients in Singapore. BMC Pulm Med. 2018;18(1):85. pmid:29788943
  8. 8. Jhun BW, Moon SM, Jeon K, Kwon OJ, Yoo H, Carriere KC, et al. Prognostic factors associated with long-term mortality in 1445 patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: a 15-year follow-up study. Eur Respir J. 2020;55(1):1900798. pmid:31619468
  9. 9. Santamaría Valencia C, Rodríguez De Rivera Socorro M, Socorro Ávila I, Perez Mendoza GJ, Campos-Herrero Navas MI, Caminero Luna JA. The survival of mycobacterium abscessus over twenty years. Eur Respir J. 2022;60(suppl 66):3476.
  10. 10. Ellis SM, Hansell DM. Imaging of non-tuberculous (atypical) mycobacterial pulmonary infection. Clin Radiol. 2002;57(8):661–9. pmid:12169277
  11. 11. Reich JM, Johnson RE. Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease presenting as an isolated lingular or middle lobe pattern. The Lady Windermere syndrome. Chest. 1992;101(6):1605–9. pmid:1600780
  12. 12. Kartalija M, Ovrutsky AR, Bryan CL, Pott GB, Fantuzzi G, Thomas J, et al. Patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease exhibit unique body and immune phenotypes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187(2):197–205. pmid:23144328
  13. 13. Kim RD, Greenberg DE, Ehrmantraut ME, Guide SV, Ding L, Shea Y, et al. Pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial disease: prospective study of a distinct preexisting syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178(10):1066–74. pmid:18703788
  14. 14. Dirac MA, Horan KL, Doody DR, Meschke JS, Park DR, Jackson LA, et al. Environment or host?: A case-control study of risk factors for Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(7):684–91. pmid:22859521
  15. 15. Lam PK, Griffith DE, Aksamit TR, Ruoss SJ, Garay SM, Daley CL, et al. Factors related to response to intermittent treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173(11):1283–9. pmid:16514112
  16. 16. Aliberti S, Sotgiu G, Castellotti P, Ferrarese M, Pancini L, Pasat A, et al. Real-life evaluation of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing treatment for non-tuberculous mycobacteria lung disease: a ten-year cohort study. Respir Med. 2020;164:105899. pmid:32094101
  17. 17. Cheng L-P, Chen S-H, Lou H, Gui X-W, Shen X-N, Cao J, et al. Factors associated with treatment outcome in patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: a large population-based retrospective cohort study in Shanghai. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022;7(2):27. pmid:35202222
  18. 18. Koh WJ, Jeong BH, Kim SY, Jeon K, Park KU, Jhun BW, et al. Mycobacterial characteristics and treatment outcomes in Mycobacterium abscessus lung disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(3):309–16.
  19. 19. Jarand J, Davis JP, Cowie RL, Field SK, Fisher DA. Long-term follow-up of Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease in patients treated with regimens including clofazimine and/or rifampin. Chest. 2016;149(5):1285–93. pmid:26513209
  20. 20. Xu H-B, Jiang R-H, Li L. Treatment outcomes for Mycobacterium avium complex: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33(3):347–58. pmid:23979729
  21. 21. Gramegna A, Lombardi A, Lorè NI, Amati F, Barone I, Azzarà C. Innate and adaptive lymphocytes in non-tuberculous mycobacteria lung disease: a review. Front Immunol. 2022;13.
  22. 22. Bar-Oz M, Meir M, Barkan D. Virulence-associated secretion in Mycobacterium abscessus. Front Immunol. 2022;13.
  23. 23. Park H-E, Lee W, Choi S, Jung M, Shin M-K, Shin SJ. Modulating macrophage function to reinforce host innate resistance against Mycobacterium avium complex infection. Front Immunol. 2022;13:931876. pmid:36505429
  24. 24. Abe Y, Fukushima K, Hosono Y, Matsumoto Y, Motooka D, Ose N, et al. Host immune response and novel diagnostic approach to NTM infections. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(12).
  25. 25. Shamaei M, Mirsaeidi M. Nontuberculous mycobacteria, macrophages, and host innate immune response. Infect Immun. 2021;89(8):e0081220.
  26. 26. Oh C-T, Moon C, Jeong MS, Kwon S-H, Jang J. Drosophila melanogaster model for Mycobacterium abscessus infection. Microbes Infect. 2013;15(12):788–95. pmid:23831804
  27. 27. Bernut A, Herrmann J-L, Kissa K, Dubremetz J-F, Gaillard J-L, Lutfalla G, et al. Mycobacterium abscessus cording prevents phagocytosis and promotes abscess formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(10):E943–52. pmid:24567393
  28. 28. Sweet L, Zhang W, Torres-Fewell H, Serianni A, Boggess W, Schorey J. Mycobacterium avium glycopeptidolipids require specific acetylation and methylation patterns for signaling through toll-like receptor 2. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(48):33221–31. pmid:18824550
  29. 29. Roux A-L, Ray A, Pawlik A, Medjahed H, Etienne G, Rottman M, et al. Overexpression of proinflammatory TLR-2-signalling lipoproteins in hypervirulent mycobacterial variants. Cell Microbiol. 2011;13(5):692–704. pmid:21143571
  30. 30. Wang T, Lafuse WP, Zwilling BS. Regulation of toll-like receptor 2 expression by macrophages following Mycobacterium avium infection. J Immunol. 2000;165(11):6308–13. pmid:11086067
  31. 31. Kim J-S, Kang M-J, Kim WS, Han SJ, Kim HM, Kim HW, et al. Essential engagement of Toll-like receptor 2 in initiation of early protective Th1 response against rough variants of Mycobacterium abscessus. Infect Immun. 2015;83(4):1556–67. pmid:25644006
  32. 32. Fulton SA, Johnsen JM, Wolf SF, Sieburth DS, Boom WH. Interleukin-12 production by human monocytes infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis: role of phagocytosis. Infect Immun. 1996;64(7):2523–31. pmid:8698475
  33. 33. Humphreys IR, Stewart GR, Turner DJ, Patel J, Karamanou D, Snelgrove RJ, et al. A role for dendritic cells in the dissemination of mycobacterial infection. Microbes Infect. 2006;8(5):1339–46. pmid:16697232
  34. 34. Serour F, Mizrahi A, Somekh E, Feinberg J, Picard C, Casanova J-L, et al. Analysis of the interleukin-12/interferon-gamma pathway in children with non-tuberculous mycobacterial cervical lymphadenitis. Eur J Pediatr. 2007;166(8):835–41. pmid:17120032
  35. 35. Bekker LG, Freeman S, Murray PJ, Ryffel B, Kaplan G. TNF-alpha controls intracellular mycobacterial growth by both inducible nitric oxide synthase-dependent and inducible nitric oxide synthase-independent pathways. J Immunol. 2001;166(11):6728–34. pmid:11359829
  36. 36. Bermudez LE, Young LS. Recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor activates human macrophages to inhibit growth or kill Mycobacterium avium complex. J Leukoc Biol. 1990;48(1):67–73. pmid:2113563
  37. 37. Rothchild AC, Stowell B, Goyal G, Nunes-Alves C, Yang Q, Papavinasasundaram K. Role of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor production by t cells during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. mBio. 2017;8(5).
  38. 38. Ohga S, Ikeuchi K, Kadoya R, Okada K, Miyazaki C, Suita S, et al. Intrapulmonary Mycobacterium avium infection as the first manifestation of chronic granulomatous disease. J Infect. 1997;34(2):147–50. pmid:9138139
  39. 39. Rolston KV, Jones PG, Fainstein V, Bodey GP. Pulmonary disease caused by rapidly growing mycobacteria in patients with cancer. Chest. 1985;87(4):503–6. pmid:3979139
  40. 40. Winthrop KL, Chang E, Yamashita S, Iademarco MF, LoBue PA. Nontuberculous mycobacteria infections and anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15(10):1556–61. pmid:19861045
  41. 41. Liu Q, Du J, An H, Li X, Guo D, Li J, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients with non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: a seven-year follow-up study conducted in a certain tertiary hospital in Beijing. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;13:1205225. pmid:37424783
  42. 42. Suska K, Amati F, Sotgiu G, Gramegna A, Mantero M, Ori M, et al. Nontuberculous mycobacteria infection and pulmonary disease in bronchiectasis. ERJ Open Res. 2022;8(4):00060–2022. pmid:36655224
  43. 43. Jung B-G, Dean K, Wadle C, Samten B, Tripathi D, Wallace RJ Jr, et al. Decreased interleukin-1 family cytokine production in patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(6):e0311022. pmid:36255321
  44. 44. Ratnatunga CN, Tungatt K, Proietti C, Halstrom S, Holt MR, Lutzky VP, et al. Characterizing and correcting immune dysfunction in non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1047781. pmid:36439147
  45. 45. Lutzky VP, Ratnatunga CN, Smith DJ, Kupz A, Doolan DL, Reid DW, et al. Anomalies in T cell function are associated with individuals at risk of Mycobacterium abscessus complex infection. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1319. pmid:29942313
  46. 46. Koh J, Kim S, Kim J-Y, Yim J-J, Kwak N. Immunologic features of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease based on spatially resolved whole transcriptomics. BMC Pulm Med. 2024;24(1):392. pmid:39138424
  47. 47. Ikegami H, Yamasaki K, Ogawa M, Nemoto K, Akata K, Noguchi S, et al. Reduced phagocytic activity of human alveolar macrophages infected with Mycobacterium avium complex. J Infect Chemother. 2022;28(11):1506–12. pmid:35926765
  48. 48. Ryu YJ, Kim EJ, Lee S-H, Kim SY, Suh GY, Chung MP, et al. Impaired expression of Toll-like receptor 2 in nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease. Eur Respir J. 2007;30(4):736–42. pmid:17567674
  49. 49. Sousa S, Borges V, Joao I, Gomes JP, Jordao L. Nontuberculous mycobacteria persistence in a cell model mimicking alveolar macrophages. Microorganisms. 2019;7(5).
  50. 50. Danelishvili L, Bermudez LE. Mycobacterium avium MAV_2941 mimics phosphoinositol-3-kinase to interfere with macrophage phagosome maturation. Microb Infect. 2015;17(9):628–37.
  51. 51. Kim B-R, Kim B-J, Kook Y-H, Kim B-J. Phagosome escape of rough Mycobacterium abscessus strains in murine macrophage via phagosomal rupture can lead to type I interferon production and their cell-to-cell spread. Front Immunol. 2019;10:125. pmid:30766538
  52. 52. Roux A-L, Viljoen A, Bah A, Simeone R, Bernut A, Laencina L, et al. The distinct fate of smooth and rough Mycobacterium abscessus variants inside macrophages. Open Biol. 2016;6(11):160185. pmid:27906132
  53. 53. Berg G, Rybakova D, Fischer D, Cernava T, Vergès M-CC, Charles T, et al. Microbiome definition re-visited: old concepts and new challenges. Microbiome. 2020;8(1):103. pmid:32605663
  54. 54. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Hamady M, Fraser-Liggett CM, Knight R, Gordon JI. The human microbiome project. Nature. 2007;449(7164):804–10. pmid:17943116
  55. 55. Lloyd-Price J, Abu-Ali G, Huttenhower C. The healthy human microbiome. Genome Med. 2016;8(1):51. pmid:27122046
  56. 56. Eloe-Fadrosh EA, Rasko DA. The human microbiome: from symbiosis to pathogenesis. Annu Rev Med. 2013;64:145–63. pmid:23327521
  57. 57. Blekhman R, Goodrich JK, Huang K, Sun Q, Bukowski R, Bell JT, et al. Host genetic variation impacts microbiome composition across human body sites. Genome Biol. 2015;16(1):191. pmid:26374288
  58. 58. Ticinesi A, Lauretani F, Tana C, Nouvenne A, Ridolo E, Meschi T. Exercise and immune system as modulators of intestinal microbiome: implications for the gut-muscle axis hypothesis. Exerc Immunol Rev. 2019;25:84–95. pmid:30753131
  59. 59. Costello EK, Lauber CL, Hamady M, Fierer N, Gordon JI, Knight R. Bacterial community variation in human body habitats across space and time. Science. 2009;326(5960):1694–7. pmid:19892944
  60. 60. Duvallet C, Gibbons SM, Gurry T, Irizarry RA, Alm EJ. Meta-analysis of gut microbiome studies identifies disease-specific and shared responses. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1784. pmid:29209090
  61. 61. Wilkins LJ, Monga M, Miller AW. Defining dysbiosis for a cluster of chronic diseases. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):12918. pmid:31501492
  62. 62. Van Hul M, Cani PD, Petitfils C, De Vos WM, Tilg H, El-Omar EM. What defines a healthy gut microbiome? Gut. 2024;73(11):1893–908. pmid:39322314
  63. 63. Bassis CM, Erb-Downward JR, Dickson RP, Freeman CM, Schmidt TM, Young VB, et al. Analysis of the upper respiratory tract microbiotas as the source of the lung and gastric microbiotas in healthy individuals. mBio. 2015;6(2):e00037. pmid:25736890
  64. 64. Dickson RP, Erb-Downward JR, Freeman CM, McCloskey L, Beck JM, Huffnagle GB, et al. Spatial variation in the healthy human lung microbiome and the adapted island model of lung biogeography. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12(6):821–30. pmid:25803243
  65. 65. Budden KF, Gellatly SL, Wood DLA, Cooper MA, Morrison M, Hugenholtz P, et al. Emerging pathogenic links between microbiota and the gut-lung axis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15(1):55–63. pmid:27694885
  66. 66. Marsland BJ, Trompette A, Gollwitzer ES. The gut-lung axis in respiratory disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12 Suppl 2:S150–6. pmid:26595731
  67. 67. Dickson RP, Martinez FJ, Huffnagle GB. The role of the microbiome in exacerbations of chronic lung diseases. Lancet. 2014;384(9944):691–702. pmid:25152271
  68. 68. Wypych TP, Wickramasinghe LC, Marsland BJ. The influence of the microbiome on respiratory health. Nat Immunol. 2019;20(10):1279–90. pmid:31501577
  69. 69. Li R, Li J, Zhou X. Lung microbiome: new insights into the pathogenesis of respiratory diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024;9(1):19. pmid:38228603
  70. 70. Budden KF, Shukla SD, Rehman SF, Bowerman KL, Keely S, Hugenholtz P, et al. Functional effects of the microbiota in chronic respiratory disease. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7(10):907–20. pmid:30975495
  71. 71. Wang Z, Bafadhel M, Haldar K, Spivak A, Mayhew D, Miller BE, et al. Lung microbiome dynamics in COPD exacerbations. Eur Respir J. 2016;47(4):1082–92. pmid:26917613
  72. 72. Purcell P, Jary H, Perry A, Perry JD, Stewart CJ, Nelson A, et al. Polymicrobial airway bacterial communities in adult bronchiectasis patients. BMC Microbiol. 2014;14:130. pmid:24886473
  73. 73. Boutin S, Graeber SY, Stahl M, Dittrich AS, Mall MA, Dalpke AH. Chronic but not intermittent infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa is associated with global changes of the lung microbiome in cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J. 2017;50(4):1701086. pmid:28982777
  74. 74. Chen F, Szymanski EP, Olivier KN, Liu X, Tettelin H, Holland SM, et al. Whole-exome sequencing identifies the 6q12-q16 linkage region and a candidate gene, TTK, for pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(12):1599–604. pmid:28777004
  75. 75. Szymanski EP, Leung JM, Fowler CJ, Haney C, Hsu AP, Chen F. Pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial infection. A multisystem, multigenic disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192(5):618–28.
  76. 76. Roy MG, Livraghi-Butrico A, Fletcher AA, McElwee MM, Evans SE, Boerner RM, et al. Muc5b is required for airway defence. Nature. 2014;505(7483):412–6. pmid:24317696
  77. 77. Fahy JV, Dickey BF. Airway mucus function and dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(23):2233–47.
  78. 78. Yang B, Ryu J, Kim T, Jo YS, Kim Y, Park HY, et al. Impact of bronchiectasis on incident nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: a 10-year national cohort study. Chest. 2021;159(5):1807–11.
  79. 79. Aksamit TR, O’Donnell AE, Barker A, Olivier KN, Winthrop KL, Daniels MLA, et al. Adult patients with bronchiectasis: a first look at the US bronchiectasis research registry. Chest. 2017;151(5):982–92. pmid:27889361
  80. 80. Perotin J-M, Coraux C, Lagonotte E, Birembaut P, Delepine G, Polette M, et al. Alteration of primary cilia in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2018;52(1):1800122. pmid:29678947
  81. 81. Lee H, Jang JG, Kim Y, Min KH, Ahn JH, Yoo KH, et al. Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Pers Med. 2024;14(11).
  82. 82. Noone PG, Leigh MW, Sannuti A, Minnix SL, Carson JL, Hazucha M, et al. Primary ciliary dyskinesia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169(4):459–67.
  83. 83. Prieto MD, Alam ME, Franciosi AN, Quon BS. Global burden of nontuberculous mycobacteria in the cystic fibrosis population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ERJ Open Res. 2023;9(1):00336–2022. pmid:36605902
  84. 84. Jang M-A, Kim S-Y, Jeong B-H, Park HY, Jeon K, Kim J-W, et al. Association of CFTR gene variants with nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease in a Korean population with a low prevalence of cystic fibrosis. J Hum Genet. 2013;58(5):298–303. pmid:23514810
  85. 85. Fowler CJ, Olivier KN, Leung JM, Smith CC, Huth AG, Root H, et al. Abnormal nasal nitric oxide production, ciliary beat frequency, and Toll-like receptor response in pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial disease epithelium. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187(12):1374–81. pmid:23593951
  86. 86. Matsuyama M, Martins AJ, Shallom S, Kamenyeva O, Kashyap A, Sampaio EP, et al. Transcriptional response of respiratory epithelium to nontuberculous mycobacteria. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2018;58(2):241–52. pmid:28915071
  87. 87. Anderson WH, Coakley RD, Button B, Henderson AG, Zeman KL, Alexis NE, et al. The relationship of mucus concentration (hydration) to mucus osmotic pressure and transport in chronic bronchitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192(2):182–90. pmid:25909230
  88. 88. Ramsey KA, Chen ACH, Radicioni G, Lourie R, Martin M, Broomfield A, et al. Airway mucus hyperconcentration in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;201(6):661–70. pmid:31765597
  89. 89. Batson BD, Zorn BT, Radicioni G, Livengood SS, Kumagai T, Dang H, et al. Cystic fibrosis airway mucus hyperconcentration produces a vicious cycle of mucin, pathogen, and inflammatory interactions that promotes disease persistence. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2022;67(2):253–65. pmid:35486871
  90. 90. Worlitzsch D, Tarran R, Ulrich M, Schwab U, Cekici A, Meyer KC, et al. Effects of reduced mucus oxygen concentration in airway Pseudomonas infections of cystic fibrosis patients. J Clin Invest. 2002;109(3):317–25. pmid:11827991
  91. 91. Hoffman CL, Lalsiamthara J, Aballay A. Host mucin is exploited by pseudomonas aeruginosa to provide monosaccharides required for a successful infection. mBio. 2020;11(2):e00060–20. pmid:32127446
  92. 92. Schaible B, McClean S, Selfridge A, Broquet A, Asehnoune K, Taylor CT, et al. Hypoxia modulates infection of epithelial cells by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56491. pmid:23418576
  93. 93. Henderson AG, Davis JM, Keith JD, Green ME, Oden AM, Rowe SM, et al. Static mucus impairs bacterial clearance and allows chronic infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the cystic fibrosis rat. Eur Respir J. 2022;60(3):2101032. pmid:35115338
  94. 94. Livraghi-Butrico A, Kelly EJ, Klem ER, Dang H, Wolfgang MC, Boucher RC, et al. Mucus clearance, MyD88-dependent and MyD88-independent immunity modulate lung susceptibility to spontaneous bacterial infection and inflammation. Mucosal Immunol. 2012;5(4):397–408. pmid:22419116
  95. 95. Kim B-G, Kang N, Kim S-Y, Kim DH, Kim H, Kwon OJ, et al. The lung microbiota in nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease. PLoS One. 2023;18(5):e0285143. pmid:37235629
  96. 96. Rowe SM, Heltshe SL, Gonska T, Donaldson SH, Borowitz D, Gelfond D, et al. Clinical mechanism of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator potentiator ivacaftor in G551D-mediated cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190(2):175–84. pmid:24927234
  97. 97. Frost FJ, Nazareth DS, Charman SC, Winstanley C, Walshaw MJ. Ivacaftor is associated with reduced lung infection by key cystic fibrosis pathogens. a cohort study using national registry data. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16(11):1375–82. pmid:31319678
  98. 98. Ricotta EE, Prevots DR, Olivier KN. CFTR modulator use and risk of nontuberculous mycobacteria positivity in cystic fibrosis, 2011–2018. ERJ Open Research. 2022;8(2):00724–2021.
  99. 99. Madan JC, Koestler DC, Stanton BA, Davidson L, Moulton LA, Housman ML, et al. Serial analysis of the gut and respiratory microbiome in cystic fibrosis in infancy: interaction between intestinal and respiratory tracts and impact of nutritional exposures. mBio. 2012;3(4):e00251–12. pmid:22911969
  100. 100. Segal LN, Clemente JC, Tsay J-CJ, Koralov SB, Keller BC, Wu BG, et al. Enrichment of the lung microbiome with oral taxa is associated with lung inflammation of a Th17 phenotype. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1:16031. pmid:27572644
  101. 101. Lee AL, Button BM, Denehy L, Roberts SJ, Bamford TL, Ellis SJ, et al. Proximal and distal gastro-oesophageal reflux in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchiectasis. Respirology. 2014;19(2):211–7. pmid:24033416
  102. 102. Koh W-J, Lee JH, Kwon YS, Lee KS, Suh GY, Chung MP, et al. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease. Chest. 2007;131(6):1825–30. pmid:17400680
  103. 103. Riddles T SK, Goh F, McWhinney B, Ungerer J, Herst C, Boushey H, Gonda I, Thomson R. Validation of the use of cromolyn sodium as a marker of aspiration in patients with bronchiectasis and other respiratory diseases. World Bronchiectasis Congress; July 2023; New York City: Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis; 2023. 2023:560–16.
  104. 104. Won EJ, Lee YJ, Kim M-J, Kim T-J, Shin H-J, Kim T-O, et al. Lower respiratory tract microbiota in patients with clinically suspected nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease according to the presence of gastroesophageal reflux. PLoS One. 2024;19(8):e0309446. pmid:39196906
  105. 105. Aldhahrani A, Verdon B, Ward C, Pearson J. Effects of bile acids on human airway epithelial cells: implications for aerodigestive diseases. ERJ Open Res. 2017;3(1):00107–2016. pmid:28344983
  106. 106. Reen FJ, Woods DF, Mooij MJ, Adams C, O’Gara F. Respiratory pathogens adopt a chronic lifestyle in response to bile. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45978. pmid:23049911
  107. 107. Reen FJ, Flynn S, Woods DF, Dunphy N, Chróinín MN, Mullane D, et al. Bile signalling promotes chronic respiratory infections and antibiotic tolerance. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29768. pmid:27432520
  108. 108. Hwang HS, Yi CA, Yoo H, Yang JH, Kim D-K, Koh W-J. The prevalence of bronchiectasis in patients with Marfan syndrome. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;18(8):995–7. pmid:25199019
  109. 109. Leung JM, Olivier KN, Prevots DR, McDonnell NB. Beyond Marfan: the clinical impact of bronchiectasis and non-tuberculous mycobacteria in connective tissue diseases. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015;19(11):1409. pmid:26467599
  110. 110. Cait A, Hughes MR, Antignano F, Cait J, Dimitriu PA, Maas KR, et al. Microbiome-driven allergic lung inflammation is ameliorated by short-chain fatty acids. Mucosal Immunol. 2018;11(3):785–95. pmid:29067994
  111. 111. Trompette A, Gollwitzer ES, Yadava K, Sichelstiel AK, Sprenger N, Ngom-Bru C, et al. Gut microbiota metabolism of dietary fiber influences allergic airway disease and hematopoiesis. Nat Med. 2014;20(2):159–66. pmid:24390308
  112. 112. Brown RL, Sequeira RP, Clarke TB. The microbiota protects against respiratory infection via GM-CSF signaling. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1512. pmid:29142211
  113. 113. Rogers GB, Bruce KD, Martin ML, Burr LD, Serisier DJ. The effect of long-term macrolide treatment on respiratory microbiota composition in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: an analysis from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled BLESS trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2(12):988–96. pmid:25458200
  114. 114. Panda S, El khader I, Casellas F, López Vivancos J, García Cors M, Santiago A, et al. Short-term effect of antibiotics on human gut microbiota. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e95476. pmid:24748167
  115. 115. Honda K, Littman DR. The microbiota in adaptive immune homeostasis and disease. Nature. 2016;535(7610):75–84. pmid:27383982
  116. 116. Schlechte J, Skalosky I, Geuking MB, McDonald B. Long-distance relationships—regulation of systemic host defense against infections by the gut microbiota. Mucosal Immunol. 2022;15(5):809–18. pmid:35732817
  117. 117. Bowerman KL, Rehman SF, Vaughan A, Lachner N, Budden KF, Kim RY, et al. Disease-associated gut microbiome and metabolome changes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5886. pmid:33208745
  118. 118. Moutsoglou DM, Tatah J, Prisco SZ, Prins KW, Staley C, Lopez S, et al. Pulmonary arterial hypertension patients have a proinflammatory gut microbiome and altered circulating microbial metabolites. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023;207(6):740–56. pmid:36343281
  119. 119. Grayson MH, Camarda LE, Hussain S-RA, Zemple SJ, Hayward M, Lam V, et al. Intestinal microbiota disruption reduces regulatory T cells and increases respiratory viral infection mortality through increased IFNγ production. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1587. pmid:30042764
  120. 120. Li N, Dai Z, Wang Z, Deng Z, Zhang J, Pu J, et al. Gut microbiota dysbiosis contributes to the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Res. 2021;22(1):274. pmid:34696775
  121. 121. van der Hee B, Wells JM. Microbial regulation of host physiology by short-chain fatty acids. Trends Microbiol. 2021;29(8):700–12. pmid:33674141
  122. 122. Mukhopadhya I, Louis P. Gut microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids and their role in human health and disease. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2025;23(10):635–51. pmid:40360779
  123. 123. Wang W-W, Mao B, Liu Y, Gu S-Y, Lu H-W, Bai J-W, et al. Altered fecal microbiome and metabolome in adult patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Respir Res. 2022;23(1):317. pmid:36403022
  124. 124. Hu Y, Feng Y, Wu J, Liu F, Zhang Z, Hao Y, et al. The gut microbiome signatures discriminate healthy from pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:90.
  125. 125. Kotlyarov S. Role of Short-Chain Fatty Acids Produced by Gut Microbiota in Innate Lung Immunity and Pathogenesis of the Heterogeneous Course of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(9).
  126. 126. Li X-K, Lu Q-B, Chen W-W, Xu W, Liu R, Zhang S-F, et al. Arginine deficiency is involved in thrombocytopenia and immunosuppression in severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10(459):eaat4162. pmid:30232226
  127. 127. Geiger R, Rieckmann JC, Wolf T, Basso C, Feng Y, Fuhrer T, et al. L-arginine modulates T cell metabolism and enhances survival and anti-tumor activity. Cell. 2016;167(3):829–842.e13. pmid:27745970
  128. 128. Nüse B, Holland T, Rauh M, Gerlach RG, Mattner J. L-arginine metabolism as pivotal interface of mutual host-microbe interactions in the gut. Gut Microbes. 2023;15(1):2222961. pmid:37358082
  129. 129. Kim YJ, Lee J-Y, Lee JJ, Jeon SM, Silwal P, Kim IS, et al. Arginine-mediated gut microbiome remodeling promotes host pulmonary immune defense against nontuberculous mycobacterial infection. Gut Microbes. 2022;14(1):2073132. pmid:35579969
  130. 130. Wu G, Meininger CJ, McNeal CJ, Bazer FW, Rhoads JM. Role of L-arginine in nitric oxide synthesis and health in humans. In: Wu G, editor. Amino acids in nutrition and health: amino acids in gene expression, metabolic regulation, and exercising performance. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 167–87.
  131. 131. Bogdanovski K, Chau T, Robinson CJ, MacDonald SD, Peterson AM, Mashek CM, et al. Antibacterial activity of high-dose nitric oxide against pulmonary Mycobacterium abscessus disease. Access Microbiol. 2020;2(9):acmi000154. pmid:33195983
  132. 132. Jung J-Y, Madan-Lala R, Georgieva M, Rengarajan J, Sohaskey CD, Bange F-C, et al. The intracellular environment of human macrophages that produce nitric oxide promotes growth of mycobacteria. Infect Immun. 2013;81(9):3198–209. pmid:23774601
  133. 133. Sulaiman I, Wu BG, Li Y, Scott AS, Malecha P, Scaglione B, et al. Evaluation of the airway microbiome in nontuberculous mycobacteria disease. Eur Respir J. 2018;52(4):1800810. pmid:30093571
  134. 134. Iwasaki K, Matsuzawa Y, Wakabayashi H, Shioya M, Hayakawa S, Tatsuno I. Lower airway microbiota in patients with clinically suspected Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease. Heliyon. 2021;7(6):e07283. pmid:34179537
  135. 135. Song MJ, Kim DH, Kim S-Y, Kang N, Jhun BW. Comparison of the sputum microbiome between patients with stable nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease and patients requiring treatment. BMC Microbiol. 2024;24(1):172. pmid:38760693
  136. 136. Kim J-Y, An S, Kim SY, Bae E, Cho Y-J, Kwak N, et al. Fecal and sputum microbiota and treatment response in patients with Mycobacterium abscessus pulmonary disease. J Infect Dis. 2025;231(5):1117–26. pmid:39498789
  137. 137. Choi JY, Shim B, Park Y, Kang YA. Alterations in lung and gut microbiota reduce diversity in patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease. Korean J Intern Med. 2023;38(6):879–92. pmid:37867139
  138. 138. Thomson R, Scoleri G, Taylor S, Leong L, Burr L, Rogers G. Relating airway microbiota composition to nontuberculous mycobacterial infections in adult bronchiectasis patients. A18 NTM: HOW, WHERE OR WHY DID I GET IT? 2019.:A1035-A.
  139. 139. Kang S-Y, Kim H, Jung S, Lee SM, Lee SP. The lung microbiota in Korean patients with non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease. BMC Microbiol. 2021;21(1):84. pmid:33736609
  140. 140. Huang H-L, Lin C-H, Lee M-R, Huang W-C, Sheu C-C, Cheng M-H, et al. Sputum bacterial microbiota signature as a surrogate for predicting disease progression of nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease. Int J Infect Dis. 2024;149:107085. pmid:38740280
  141. 141. Philley JV, Kannan A, Olusola P, McGaha P, Singh KP, Samten B, et al. Microbiome diversity in sputum of nontuberculous mycobacteria infected women with a history of breast cancer. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2019;52(2):263–79. pmid:30816674
  142. 142. Fujita K, Yamamoto Y, Kamita M, Tanaka K, Nakabayashi T, Imakita T, et al. Exploratory bronchoalveolar lavage fluid analyses reveal a high diversity of microbiome in NTM lung disease and a low diversity of microbiome in bronchiectasis. Open Respir Arch. 2024;6(4):100351. pmid:39185443
  143. 143. Caverly LJ, Zimbric M, Azar M, Opron K, LiPuma JJ. Cystic fibrosis airway microbiota associated with outcomes of nontuberculous mycobacterial infection. ERJ Open Res. 2021;7(2):00578–2020. pmid:33898611
  144. 144. Wu Y, Luo Z, Liu C. Variations in fecal microbial profiles of acute exacerbations and stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Life Sci. 2021;265:118738. pmid:33181175
  145. 145. Yamasaki K, Mukae H, Kawanami T, Fukuda K, Noguchi S, Akata K, et al. Possible role of anaerobes in the pathogenesis of nontuberculous mycobacterial infection. Respirology. 2015;20(5):758–65. pmid:25824634
  146. 146. Zakharkina T, Heinzel E, Koczulla RA, Greulich T, Rentz K, Pauling JK, et al. Analysis of the airway microbiota of healthy individuals and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by T-RFLP and clone sequencing. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e68302. pmid:23874580
  147. 147. Hogan DA, Willger SD, Dolben EL, Hampton TH, Stanton BA, Morrison HG, et al. Analysis of lung microbiota in bronchoalveolar lavage, protected brush and sputum samples from subjects with mild-to-moderate cystic fibrosis lung disease. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0149998. pmid:26943329
  148. 148. Goddard AF, Staudinger BJ, Dowd SE, Joshi-Datar A, Wolcott RD, Aitken ML, et al. Direct sampling of cystic fibrosis lungs indicates that DNA-based analyses of upper-airway specimens can misrepresent lung microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(34):13769–74. pmid:22872870
  149. 149. Grønseth R, Drengenes C, Wiker HG, Tangedal S, Xue Y, Husebø GR, et al. Protected sampling is preferable in bronchoscopic studies of the airway microbiome. ERJ Open Res. 2017;3(3):00019–2017. pmid:28875147
  150. 150. Coffey MJ, Nielsen S, Wemheuer B, Kaakoush NO, Garg M, Needham B, et al. Gut microbiota in children with cystic fibrosis: a taxonomic and functional dysbiosis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):18593. pmid:31819107
  151. 151. Lin T-L, Kuo Y-L, Lai J-H, Lu C-C, Yuan C-T, Hsu C-Y, et al. Gut microbiota dysbiosis-related susceptibility to nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease. Gut Microbes. 2024;16(1):2361490. pmid:38860456
  152. 152. Li W, Zhu Y, Liao Q, Wang Z, Wan C. Characterization of gut microbiota in children with pulmonary tuberculosis. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19(1):445. pmid:31735171
  153. 153. Chen T, Long W, Zhang C, Liu S, Zhao L, Hamaker BR. Fiber-utilizing capacity varies in Prevotella- versus Bacteroides-dominated gut microbiota. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):2594. pmid:28572676
  154. 154. Khan N, Mendonca L, Dhariwal A, Fontes G, Menzies D, Xia J, et al. Intestinal dysbiosis compromises alveolar macrophage immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mucosal Immunol. 2019;12(3):772–83. pmid:30783183
  155. 155. Nørgaard JC, Jørgensen M, Moestrup KS, Ilett EE, Zucco AG, Marandi RZ, et al. Impact of antibiotic treatment on the gut microbiome and its resistome in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. J Infect Dis. 2023;228(1):28–36. pmid:36751730
  156. 156. Willmann M, Vehreschild MJGT, Biehl LM, Vogel W, Dörfel D, Hamprecht A, et al. Distinct impact of antibiotics on the gut microbiome and resistome: a longitudinal multicenter cohort study. BMC Biol. 2019;17(1):76. pmid:31533707
  157. 157. Choo JM, Martin AM, Taylor SL, Sun E, Mobegi FM, Kanno T, et al. The impact of long-term macrolide exposure on the gut microbiome and its implications for metabolic control. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11(4):e0083123. pmid:37347185
  158. 158. Nagata N, Nishijima S, Miyoshi-Akiyama T, Kojima Y, Kimura M, Aoki R, et al. Population-level metagenomics uncovers distinct effects of multiple medications on the human gut microbiome. Gastroenterology. 2022;163(4):1038–52. pmid:35788347
  159. 159. Wei S, Mortensen MS, Stokholm J, Brejnrod AD, Thorsen J, Rasmussen MA, et al. Short- and long-term impacts of azithromycin treatment on the gut microbiota in children: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. EBioMedicine. 2018;38:265–72. pmid:30478001
  160. 160. Schwartz DJ, Langdon AE, Dantas G. Understanding the impact of antibiotic perturbation on the human microbiome. Genome Med. 2020;12(1):82. pmid:32988391
  161. 161. Park H-K, Choi Y, Lee D-H, Kim S, Lee J-M, Choi SW, et al. Altered gut microbiota by azithromycin attenuates airway inflammation in allergic asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;145(5):1466–1469.e8. pmid:32035985
  162. 162. Gibson PG, Yang IA, Upham JW, Reynolds PN, Hodge S, James AL, et al. Effect of azithromycin on asthma exacerbations and quality of life in adults with persistent uncontrolled asthma (AMAZES): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;390(10095):659–68. pmid:28687413
  163. 163. Thomson RM, Yew W-W. When and how to treat pulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Respirology. 2009;14(1):12–26. pmid:19144045
  164. 164. Sommer F, Anderson JM, Bharti R, Raes J, Rosenstiel P. The resilience of the intestinal microbiota influences health and disease. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15(10):630–8. pmid:28626231
  165. 165. Wipperman MF, Fitzgerald DW, Juste MAJ, Taur Y, Namasivayam S, Sher A, et al. Antibiotic treatment for Tuberculosis induces a profound dysbiosis of the microbiome that persists long after therapy is completed. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):10767. pmid:28883399
  166. 166. Elvers KT, Wilson VJ, Hammond A, Duncan L, Huntley AL, Hay AD, et al. Antibiotic-induced changes in the human gut microbiota for the most commonly prescribed antibiotics in primary care in the UK: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2020;10(9):e035677. pmid:32958481
  167. 167. Wang G, Stapleton JT, Baker AW, Rouphael N, Creech CB, El Sahly HM, et al. Clinical features and treatment outcomes of pulmonary Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex with and without coinfections. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022;9(8).
  168. 168. Kim J-Y, Kim SA, Hyung K, Yim J-J, Kwak N. Impact of bacterial co-isolation on treatment initiation and long-term prognosis of patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: analysis of a prospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2024;24(1):1125. pmid:39379838