Figures
Citation: Thorstenson JC, Horswill AR (2025) Staphylococcus aureus SspA (V8 protease): New skin pathogenesis insights into an old enzyme. PLoS Pathog 21(4): e1013048. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1013048
Editor: Kimberly A. Kline, University of Geneva: Universite de Geneve, SWITZERLAND
Published: April 24, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Thorstenson, Horswill. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: We acknowledge support by the National Institutes of Health (https://www.nih.gov) grant 5R01AI168005-03 (granted to ARH) and the Department of Veterans Affairs (https://www.research.va.gov/services/shared_docs/resources.cfm) Merit Award BX002711 (granted to ARH). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Proteases of bacterial pathogens and the discovery of Staphylococcus aureus SspA (V8 protease)
Proteases are ubiquitous enzymes that catalyze peptide bond hydrolysis, and bacterial pathogens utilize proteases to facilitate their invasion and persistence in host environments. For example, Streptococcus pyogenes uses SpeB to degrade fibrinogen and other extracellular matrix proteins for tissue invasion, and Yersinia pestis triggers macrophage cell death by inactivating MAPK and NF-κB signaling via YopJ [1,2]. Staphylococcus aureus, a versatile human pathogen, is famous for its vast array of virulence factors that enable infection of nearly every body site. Most S. aureus strains encode 10 extracellular proteases with unique substrate specificities and mechanisms that contribute to pathogenesis.
The first S. aureus extracellular protease was identified more than 50 years ago and was isolated from strain V8 by Drapeau and colleagues [3]. V8 protease (SspA) is a serine protease with high specificity for peptide bond hydrolysis on the carboxy side of glutamate residues, though it has been shown to also be capable of cleaving after aspartate residues to a lesser extent. Given its unique substrate specificity and ease to natively purify in large quantities, SspA is extensively used commercially to digest proteins for peptide analysis by mass spectrometry across many disciplines.
The sspABC locus encodes V8 protease (sspA), cysteine protease staphopain B (sspB), and a small protein inhibitor of staphopain B (sspC) [4]. Although S. aureus protease regulation is quite nuanced, the ssp operon is positively regulated by the Agr quorum sensing system and inhibited by SarA [5]. SspA is secreted as a 36.3 kDa zymogen with an N-terminal propeptide that is proteolytically removed via intermolecular proteolysis and a final cleavage by an additional S. aureus protease, aureolysin (Aur), which releases the 29.1 kDa enzymatically active SspA [6]. The first high-resolution crystallographic structure of SspA (PDB ID code 1QY6) revealed that this enzyme folds similarly to several other serine proteases, such as trypsin and the staphylococcal epidermolytic toxins A and B [7]. While highly homologous glutamyl endopeptidases are common amongst other Gram-positive opportunistic pathogens, such as Staphylococcus epidermidis (Esp) and Enterococcus faecalis (SprE), a unique feature that distinguishes SspA from these other proteases is the presence of a 52-residue C-terminal domain (CTD) of unknown function [8,9]. The SspA CTD is highly conserved amongst S. aureus and contains a repeating P-[DN]-N motif, which suggests propensity for type II polyproline helix (PPII) formation. PPII helices are highly flexible secondary structures that often serve as modules for biologically relevant protein–protein interactions, though this has not been demonstrated for the SspA CTD [10,11]. Despite the discovery of SspA over 50 years ago, its specific roles in S. aureus pathogenesis have only recently begun to be understood.
SspA contributes to Staphylococcus aureus virulence and pathogenesis on the skin
S. aureus is the leading cause of skin and soft-tissue infections globally, which can progress to fatal invasive diseases if left untreated. Additionally, while S. aureus colonization of healthy skin is often transient, over 70% of lesions in patients with atopic dermatitis, a chronic skin disease, are persistently colonized by S. aureus which may directly exacerbate symptoms [12]. Thus, understanding the molecular mechanisms driving S. aureus skin colonization and infection may lead to development of novel therapeutics for S. aureus infections and chronic skin diseases.
Generally, S. aureus proteases contribute to pathogenesis through tissue degradation, immune evasion, nutrient acquisition, biofilm formation, and limiting virulence factor output. A well-known example of S. aureus proteases causing skin pathology is staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome. S. aureus epidermolytic toxins A and B (ETA, ETB), which are both glutamyl endopeptidases like SspA, cleave desmoglein-1 in the upper epidermis, causing epidermal detachment and blistering [13]. However, more recently evolved S. aureus strains, such as members of the USA300 lineage, do not encode or express these proteases. Despite this, S. aureus infections still significantly disrupt epidermal barrier integrity through proteases like SspA.
S. aureus cell-free supernatants damage keratinocyte barrier integrity in a sspA-dependent manner. Furthermore, recombinant SspA is sufficient to induce this barrier damage in a dose-dependent manner, which has been proposed to proceed through the degradation of tight junction (TJ) proteins such as claudin-1 (Fig 1A) [14,15]. In a murine model, direct application of SspA to the skin led to epidermal barrier dysfunction, as measured by trans-epidermal water loss and riboflavin penetration into the stratum corneum—the outermost layer of the epidermis [16]. While these studies indicate that SspA drives S. aureus-induced epidermal barrier dysfunction, the primary SspA substrates leading to this damage in vivo remain largely unknown. Despite the ability of SspA to degrade claudin-1 in vitro [14] and the observation that S. aureus proteases disrupt spatial organization of other TJ proteins occludin and ZO-1 [15], these mechanisms have not been experimentally demonstrated to be the cause of SspA-induced barrier disruption in vivo.
S. aureus SspA serves several identified functions during skin infection, including disruption of the epidermal barrier in the upper epidermis, potentially through tight junction protein degradation (A); degradation of immune factors in the lower epidermis/upper dermis (B); modification of its own secreted and surface-associated virulence factors (C); and induction of itch via PAR1 activation in the lower epidermis (D). The SspA C-terminal domain (CTD) may contribute to virulence, possibly by mediating protein-protein interactions with skin components (E). FnBPs, fibronectin-binding proteins; Atl, autolysin; IgG, immunoglobulin G; AMPs, antimicrobial peptides; PAR1, protease-activated receptor 1; CTD, C-terminal domain; PPII, type II polyproline helix. Created with BioRender.
In addition to directly interfering with skin barrier integrity, SspA mediates S. aureus immune evasion through the degradation of host-derived immune components, which may modulate the skin immune environment. SspA degrades most immunoglobulin classes, including IgG, IgM, and IgA [17]. Following systemic infection with S. aureus, the host also mounts a B-cell response resulting in production of SspA-targeting neutralizing antibodies, and individuals persistently colonized with S. aureus harbor SspA-specific antibodies, underscoring the importance of SspA in S. aureus pathogenesis [18,19]. SspA also inhibits the human complement system through the efficient degradation of C1q, C3, C5, and others [20]. Additional targets that could mediate bacterial immune evasion and dissemination include members of the clotting cascade, host protease inhibitors, and antimicrobial peptides (Fig 1B) [21]. However, the consequences of degradation of these immune factors to S. aureus success in skin colonization and infection have not yet been fully evaluated.
Beyond promoting degradation of host factors, S. aureus proteases also modulate levels of its own virulence factors that contribute to pathogenesis. A specific example for SspA is its ability to degrade the fibronectin-binding proteins, which are important surface adhesins that mediate attachment of S. aureus to host cells [22]. Further, sspA is required for biofilm formation in S. aureus strain Newman, which is proposed to proceed through proteolytic modulation of autolysin activity, and biofilm formation is an important process in S. aureus pathogenesis on the skin and in other models of infection [9,23].
Recently, a highly specific role for SspA during S. aureus skin infection was identified. Deng and colleagues found that in a murine epicutaneous infection model, S. aureus induced a strong itching response, which led to a significant amount of scratch-induced skin damage [24]. Through systematically testing S. aureus mutants, sspA was found to be required for itch. SspA is also sufficient to induce itching; intradermal injection of pure SspA elicited a strong itch response comparable to the known itch-inducing agent histamine. The authors also identified an important host target involved in this process—protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1). SspA activates PAR1 expressed in pruriceptor sensory neurons, which leads to neuronal activation and transmission of the sensation to itch (Fig 1D). This phenomenon proceeds independent of immune-mediated itch, revealing the direct ability of S. aureus to induce itch in an animal model [24].
While this mechanism of S. aureus-induced itch has been well characterized, numerous outstanding questions remain from the bacterial perspective. sspA is upregulated during skin colonization, but the skin-specific signals and bacterial sensory systems contributing to this transcriptional change remain elusive. While the agr system is required, there may be additional regulatory mechanisms driving increased SspA production on the skin. Additionally, the SspA-activating enzyme, Aur, is not required for itch, which suggests the presence of an alternative protease native to the skin environment that may activate SspA [24]. Finally, it has not been tested whether the SspA CTD is required for SspA proteolytic activity, and it is possible that SspA CTD PPII helix formation could potentially facilitate strong protein–protein interactions with host targets in the skin, such as PAR1, and contribute to itch induction or epidermal barrier disruption (Fig 1E). Altogether, this study has unveiled a novel, specific virulence function for SspA during skin infection and has revived interest in this old enzyme.
Summary
Although S. aureus SspA was first isolated over 50 years ago, we are only beginning to understand its role in bacterial pathogenesis, especially during skin colonization and infection. SspA contributes to S. aureus virulence on the skin by disrupting the epithelial barrier, modulating the immune environment, and manipulating the host sensory nervous system to drive itch, causing the host to further disrupt the skin barrier through scratching. While the primary host target driving itch has been identified, much work remains to fully elucidate the primary SspA substrates in the skin that S. aureus degrades to permit skin colonization and infection.
References
- 1. Kapur V, Topouzis S, Majesky MW, Li LL, Hamrick MR, Hamill RJ, et al. A conserved Streptococcus pyogenes extracellular cysteine protease cleaves human fibronectin and degrades vitronectin. Microb Pathog. 1993;15(5):327–46. pmid:7516997
- 2. Orth K. Function of the Yersinia effector YopJ. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2002;5(1):38–43.
- 3. Drapeau GR, Boily Y, Houmard J. Purification and properties of an extracellular protease of Staphylococcus aureus. J Biol Chem. 1972;247(20):6720–6. pmid:4627743
- 4. Rice K, Peralta R, Bast D, de Azavedo J, McGavin MJ. Description of staphylococcus serine protease (ssp) operon in Staphylococcus aureus and nonpolar inactivation of sspA-encoded serine protease. Infect Immun. 2001;69(1):159–69. pmid:11119502
- 5. Gimza BD, Larias MI, Budny BG, Shaw LN. Mapping the global network of extracellular protease regulation in Staphylococcus aureus. mSphere. 2019;4(5):e00676-19. pmid:31645429
- 6. Nickerson NN, Prasad L, Jacob L, Delbaere LT, McGavin MJ. Activation of the SspA serine protease zymogen of Staphylococcus aureus proceeds through unique variations of a trypsinogen-like mechanism and is dependent on both autocatalytic and metalloprotease-specific processing. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(47):34129–38. pmid:17878159
- 7. Prasad L, Leduc Y, Hayakawa K, Delbaere L. The structure of a universally employed enzyme: V8 protease from Staphylococcus aureus. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2004;60(2):256–9.
- 8. Drapeau GR. Unusual COOH-terminal structure of staphylococcal protease. J Biol Chem. 1978;253(17):5899–901.
- 9. Chen C, Krishnan V, Macon K, Manne K, Narayana S, Schneewind O. Secreted proteases control autolysin-mediated biofilm growth of Staphylococcus aureus. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(41):29440–52.
- 10. Adzhubei AA, Sternberg MJE, Makarov AA. Polyproline-II helix in proteins: structure and function. J Mol Biol. 2013;425(12):2100–32. pmid:23507311
- 11. Berisio R, Vitagliano L. Polyproline and triple helix motifs in host-pathogen recognition. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2012;13(8):855–65. pmid:23305370
- 12. Totté JEE, van der Feltz WT, Hennekam M, van Belkum A, van Zuuren EJ, Pasmans SGMA. Prevalence and odds of Staphylococcus aureus carriage in atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2016;175(4):687–95. pmid:26994362
- 13. Amagai M, Matsuyoshi N, Wang ZH, Andl C, Stanley JR. Toxin in bullous impetigo and staphylococcal scalded-skin syndrome targets desmoglein 1. Nat Med. 2000;6(11):1275–7. pmid:11062541
- 14. Wang B, McHugh BJ, Qureshi A, Campopiano DJ, Clarke DJ, Fitzgerald JR, et al. IL-1β-induced protection of keratinocytes against Staphylococcus aureus-secreted proteases is mediated by human β-Defensin 2. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137(1):95–105. pmid:27702565
- 15. Ohnemus U, Kohrmeyer K, Houdek P, Rohde H, Wladykowski E, Vidal S, et al. Regulation of epidermal tight-junctions (TJ) during infection with exfoliative toxin-negative Staphylococcus strains. J Invest Dermatol. 2008;128(4):906–16. pmid:17914452
- 16. Hirasawa Y, Takai T, Nakamura T, Mitsuishi K, Gunawan H, Suto H, et al. Staphylococcus aureus extracellular protease causes epidermal barrier dysfunction. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130(2):614–7. pmid:19812593
- 17. Prokešová L, Potuzníková B, Potempa J, Zikán J, Radl J, Hachová L, et al. Cleavage of human immunoglobulins by serine proteinase from Staphylococcus aureus. Immunol Lett. 1992;31(3):259–65.
- 18. Calander A-M, Dubin G, Potempa J, Tarkowski A. Staphylococcus aureus infection triggers production of neutralizing, V8 protease-specific antibodies. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2008;52(2):267–72. pmid:18205806
- 19. Holtfreter S, Nguyen TTH, Wertheim H, Steil L, Kusch H, Truong QP, et al. Human immune proteome in experimental colonization with Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009;16(11):1607–14. pmid:19759252
- 20. Jusko M, Potempa J, Kantyka T, Bielecka E, Miller H, Kalinska M. Staphylococcal proteases aid in evasion of the human complement system. J Innate Immun. 2013;6(1):31–46.
- 21. Frey AM, Chaput D, Shaw LN. Insight into the human pathodegradome of the V8 protease from Staphylococcus aureus. Cell Rep. 2021;35(1):108930. pmid:33826899
- 22. McGavin MJ, Zahradka C, Rice K, Scott JE. Modification of the Staphylococcus aureus fibronectin binding phenotype by V8 protease. Infect Immun. 1997;65(7):2621–8. pmid:9199429
- 23. Allen HB, Vaze ND, Choi C, Hailu T, Tulbert BH, Cusack CA, et al. The presence and impact of biofilm-producing staphylococci in atopic dermatitis. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(3):260–5. pmid:24452476
- 24. Deng L, Costa F, Blake K, Choi S, Chandrabalan A, Yousuf M, et al. S. aureus drives itch and scratch-induced skin damage through a V8 protease-PAR1 axis. Cell. 2023;186(24):5375–5393.e25.