Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Portrait of a killer: Uncovering resistance mechanisms and global spread of Acinetobacter baumannii

  • Amy K. Cain ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Amy K. Cain, Mehrad Hamidian

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation ARC Centre of Excellence in Synthetic Biology, School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia

  • Mehrad Hamidian

    Contributed equally to this work with: Amy K. Cain, Mehrad Hamidian

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    mehrad.hamidian@uts.edu.au

    Affiliation Australian Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance is a growing global concern in the field of medicine as it renders bacterial infections difficult to treat and often more severe. Acinetobacter baumannii is a gram-negative bacterial pathogen causing a wide range of infections, including pneumonia, sepsis, urinary tract infections, and wound infections. A. baumannii has emerged as a significant healthcare-associated pathogen due to its high level of antibiotic resistance. The global spread of antibiotic-resistant strains of A. baumannii has resulted in limited treatment options, leading to increased morbidity and mortality rates, especially in vulnerable populations such as the elderly and immunocompromised individuals, as well as longer hospital stays and higher healthcare costs. Further complicating the situation, multi- and pan-drug-resistant strains of A. baumannii are becoming increasingly common, and these deadly strains are resistant to all or almost all available antibiotics. A. baumannii employs various clever strategies to develop antibiotic resistance, including horizontal transfer of resistance genes, overexpression of inherent efflux pumps that remove drugs from the cell, intrinsic mutations, combined with natural selection under antibiotic selective pressure leading to emergence of successful resistance clones. The typical multidrug resistance phenotype of A. baumannii is, therefore, an orchestrated collimation of all these mechanisms combined with the worldwide spread of “global clones,” rendering infections caused by this pathogen challenging to control and treat. To address the escalating problem of antibiotic resistance in A. baumannii, there is a need for increased surveillance, strict infection control measures, and the development of new treatment strategies, requiring a concerted effort by healthcare professionals, researchers, and policymakers.

Acinetobacter baumannii is a highly resistant, globally distributed hospital pathogen

A. baumannii is a gram-negative opportunistic pathogen, and a notorious “ESKAPE” bacteria, the leading cause of antibiotic-resistant nosocomial infections globally [1]. A. baumannii causes a variety of infections including pneumonia, wound, blood and urinary tract infections and presents a significant global burden, with up to 1.4 million cases reported annually [2]. High levels of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) commonly lead to treatment failure [3], with resistance to last-resort beta-lactam antibiotics such as carbapenems (e.g., imipenem, meropenem) presenting particular concern [4,5]. Indeed, carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii tops the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) list of pathogens prioritised for the development of new antibiotics [6]. Key players belong to 2 major clones, namely ST1 (known as global or international clone 1, also known as GC1 or IC1, respectively) and ST2 (known as global or international clone 2, namely GC2 or IC2, respectively), which account for the vast majority of outbreaks globally [711]. Carbapenem-resistant infection outbreaks have surged since the start of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic due to a dramatic increase in the number of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions [1215].

Here, we provide a snapshot of how the coalition of intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms, combined with the global spread of resistance clones, has resulted in this deadly scourge of multidrug-resistant (MDR) A. baumannii infections spreading among hospitalised patients. In particular, we discuss unappreciated antibiotic resistance mechanisms (e.g., homologous recombination), highlight their role in resistance gene acquisition, and show how they contribute to the overall resistance and success of A. baumannii.

Mobile genetic elements play significant roles in the acquisition and spread of antibiotic resistance genes

In A. baumannii, the emergence of AMR most often is mediated by the acquisition of antibiotic resistance genes via a wide range of mobile genetic elements (MGEs) including genomic islands (GIs), transposons (Tns), integrons, insertion sequences (ISs), and plasmids [3,4]. Resistance elements (Tn, GI, IS, plasmids, etc.) can insert into chromosomes (Tn, GI, and IS can also insert into plasmids), spreading resistance genes to new Acinetobacter cells or be maintained on plasmids in the cells (Fig 1A and 1B).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Schematic representation of mechanisms involved in antibiotic resistance of A.

baumannii. (A) indicates the acquisition of a plasmid that carries antibiotic resistance genes; (B) is an schematic of antibiotic resistance gene acquisition via insertion of a composite Tn onto the chromosome (marked “Chr”); (C) indicates the insertion of ISAba1 (IS) upstream of the chromosomal ampC gene, providing the gene a strong promoter and therefore enhancing expression level leading to resistance to third-generation cephalosporins; (D) is a schematic of acquiring a resistance region (GI, T, etc.) via its flanking sequences—of any length—via homologous recombination [25]. ARG, antibiotic resistance gene; GI, genomic island; IS, insertion sequence; Tn, transposon.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1011520.g001

Transposons and genomic islands

Several chromosomal GIs and Tns play a leading role in introducing antibiotic resistance genes, including those specific to a given sequence type and others shared between all clones. In ST1 strains, variants of AbaR-type GIs found in the chromosomal comM gene carry several heavy metal and antibiotic resistance genes, including those conferring resistance to aminoglycosides [11]. The AbaR-type GIs are made of a backbone Tn and a resistance region in the middle consisting of various complete and incomplete fragments from well-known Tns [16]. In ST2 strains, which are, by far, the most abundant sequence type globally, resistance genes are located on different GI types, namely AbGRI1-5. These GIs contain genes that confer resistance to several antibiotic families, including aminoglycosides, carbapenems, and beta-lactams [1721]. Like AbaR-type islands in ST1 strains, AbGRI1 variants also consist of a Tn backbone, which is related to the backbone of AbaR-type islands, and occupy the exact chromosomal location as AbaR-type islands [21]. AbGRI2, AbGRI3, and AbGRI4 are also chromosomal GIs made of DNA segments, flanked and formed by IS26 and several antibiotic aminoglycosides and extended-spectrum ß-lactam resistance genes [17,20]. However, other clones, such as ST79 and ST85 strains, harbour variants of Tn7, which play a significant role in the acquisition and spread of diverse antibiotic resistance genes, including for amikacin (aphA6) and carbapenem (blaNDM) [22,23].

In addition to the clone/ST-specific genomic resistance islands, a range of shared composite Tns that are sequence-type agnostic play a crucial role in the acquisition and dissemination of resistance genes across A. baumannii. For example the small Tns Tn2006, Tn2007, Tn2008, and Tn2009 mobilising the oxa23 carbapenem resistance gene [4,9], or AbaR4, the 16-kb GI that carries Tn2006 (containing oxa23), are widely spread across different clones [4,5].

Plasmids

It is becoming increasingly clear that plasmids are also responsible (in addition to GIs) for shuffling important antibiotic resistance genes around within A. baumannii [24]. Although previously underappreciated, it has now been established that several (unusual) plasmid types play a significant role in the spread of resistance genes. For example, the small plasmid pRAY (6 kb) and its variants are widely distributed in Acinetobacter spp., carry the aadB gene, and are the most common cause of resistance to gentamicin and tobramycin in A. baumannii [25]. Further, conjugative plasmids have facilitated the spread of the oxa23 (carbapenem) and the aphA6 (amikacin) resistance genes, using the RP-T1 (formerly Aci6; encoding a Rep belonging to Pfam03090) replication initiation protein and the MPFF conjugation system, respectively [24,2628]. Other large exotic conjugative plasmids such as those related to pA297-3, pAB3, or pD46-4, which encode the MPFI conjugation system, also carry a wide range of common antibiotic resistance genes, including oxa23, strAB, and sul2 [29,30]. Conjugative plasmids related to pA297-3 family have also been attributed to pathogenicity and regulation of virulence determinant (e.g., in urinary tract infections) [31]. Moreover, variants of small plasmid types that encode the Rep_3 replication initiation proteins (Pfam01051) are also crucial in acquiring and disseminating the oxa24 and oxa58 carbapenem resistance genes [24,32].

Homologous recombination is a significant yet overlooked mechanism of resistance acquisition

Homologous recombination (HR) is a type of host-mediated genetic recombination through which segments of DNA (up to hundreds of kb) are exchanged between 2 shorter identical (or very similar) DNA sequences (down to tens of bps) [33,34]. HR plays an important, yet often overlooked, role in bacterial genomes’ evolution and horizontal gene acquisition [33,34]. Recently, the effects of HR on resistance spread in A. baumannii are becoming elucidated. For example, while resistance to third-generation cephalosporins is known to occur via the insertion of ISAba1 upstream of the intrinsic chromosomal ampC gene (Fig 1C), the IS can be acquired either via direct IS insertion, as mediated by classical transposition, or from DNA exchange with a different strain, as mediated by HR between large DNA segments present in several ST1 and ST25 lineages [3537]. In another example, the AbGRI3 island (approximately 20 kb), which includes several resistance genes (armA, aphA1, msr-mph(E), sul1, aadA1, and catB8) and is common in ST2 strains, is acquired from another ST2 (GC2) via HR, as part of a larger (>56 kb) DNA chromosomal segment by ST1 strains [37]. HR has been shown to be responsible for a non-ST2 A. baumannii hospital isolate acquiring a genomic resistance island (AbGRI5, carrying the armA, msr-mph(E), sul1, blaPER-1, aadA1, cmlA1, aadA2, blaCARB-2, and ere(B) resistance genes) from ST2 (GC2) [18]. Finally, it has been shown that the classic gyrA and parC mutations that lead to fluoroquinolone resistance are freely exchanged throughout A. baumannii isolates by acquiring DNA segments containing the mutated alleles, via HR [37]. Although these examples highlight some impacts of HR on the acquisition and evolution of resistance genes, further investigations across the broad range of sequence types and geographical areas are needed to determine the full, potentially large, role of HR in A. baumannii resistance.

Intrinsic mechanisms of antibiotic resistance

One resistance mechanism classically associated with A. baumannii is their impressive suite of efflux transporters, which actively pump antibiotics and biocides out of the periplasm via proton motive force before cell damage occurs. There are 5 major classes of efflux pump families associated with resistance in A. baumannii, namely, resistance-nodulation-division (RND; e.g., AdeABC), major facilitator superfamily (MFS; e.g., TetA, AmvA), multidrug and toxic efflux (MATE; e.g., AbeM), the small multidrug resistance (SMR; e.g., AbeS), and ATP binding cassette (ABC; e.g., MacAB/TolC). The most significant resistance-associated pumps in A. baumannii are part of the RND family efflux pumps, which have broad specificity and are present in most strains [38]. The most common resistance pumps are encoded by adeABC, adeFGH, and adeIJK [39,40]. In addition to the presence and absence of these efflux pumps, the regulation of their activity can dictate resistance; some are constitutively expressed, and some are tightly regulated and activated in response to specific drugs or environmental cues. For example, the adeABC operon encodes AdeA (membrane fusion protein), AdeB (multidrug transporter), and AdeC (outer membrane protein) to form a pump spanning the inner and outer membrane (Fig 2A), and its expression is regulated by the AdeRS TCS in response to fluoroquinolone exposure (Fig 2) [41]. However, constitutive overexpression of adeABC results in broader resistance (to aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, chloramphenicol, β-lactams, and tigecycline) and can occur as a result of ISAba1 insertion upstream of adeABC (Fig 2B) or via point mutations in adeR or adeS, having major clinical implications [4244]. Interestingly, inherent efflux activity seems to act in a strain-dependent context, where certain pumps are expressed in different strains; for example, AdeABC appears to be more active in ATCC17978, whereas AdeIJK is more active in AB5075 (GC1) for drug resistance [40,45].

thumbnail
Fig 2. Intrinsic resistance mechanisms.

(A) AdeABC pump (of the RND family) is the most important for efflux-mediated drug resistance in A. baumannii. (B) Regulation of AdeABC is mediated by AdeRS, where ISs and single point mutations can disrupt these genes and result in overexpression. IM, inner membrane; IS, insertion sequence; LOS, lipooligosaccaride; OM, outer membrane; RND, resistance-nodulation-division.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1011520.g002

However, other intrinsic resistance mechanisms are employed by the A. baumannii cells to evade antibiotic action, including target site modification via single point mutations, where the active site of the drug is modified to render it ineffective [46] or IS insertion to change regulation as is seen across several antibiotic classes.

Resistance to colistin and other polymyxins

Colistin and other polymyxins are a last resort within our arsenal of antibiotics that largely remained effective against MDR A. baumannii. However, increasing levels of resistance are being recorded, and several molecular drivers have been identified that underpin this last-line resistance. Colistin resistance is due to point mutations in key genes that cause the bacterium to alter the sugar moieties of or even completely shed its lipooligosaccaride (LOS), resulting in the colistin being unable to bind to its target [47,48]. In the case of LOS loss, this was found to be due to ISAba11 disrupting the Lipid A biosynthesis genes lpxA/C. Interestingly, the loss of LOS seems to be an A. baumannii-specific resistance strategy, as other gram-negative bacteria never lose their lipopolysaccharide (LPS), but only use Lipid A modification. Other mutations target specific downstream effectors that affect lipid and membrane production and stability, including lpxA [49] and the mla operon [50].

Colistin resistance mutations arise in two-component systems (TCSs) that control the production and modification of LOS, namely in PhoPQ, PmrAB [51], BaeSR [50], or StkSR [52]. For example, pmrA/B TCS controls pmrC expression, which encodes a pEtN transferase to modify the Lipid A, providing resistance. So far, 68 amino acid changes have been identified for A. baumannii across this system that mediates colistin resistance [53], and the mutations only need to be present in a subset of the population, presenting as colistin heteroresistance [54].

Recently, colistin resistance has also been described as been carried on plasmids, via the mcr gene, and this has been demonstrated for A. baumannii from clinical isolates and even environmental samples [55].

Resistance to carbapenems and third-generation cephalosporins

Unlike most gram-negative bacteria (e.g., Enterobacterales), in A. baumannii, resistance to carbapenems is due to the acquisition of carbapenem-hydrolysing oxacillinase-encoding (class D) genes such as oxa23, oxa24, and oxa58 [4]. Of these, oxa23 is by far the most abundant in many countries, while oxa24 and oxa58 appear to be more dominant in specific regions. The oxa23 gene moved by Tn2006-9, with Tn2006 being the most abundant Tn that spreads this gene [4]. Other carbapenem resistance genes such as metallo-ß-lactam resistance genes are also reported but remain rarely seen [4].

Genes encoding the extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) are responsible for resistance to extended-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics in most gram-negative bacteria. However, in A. baumannii, it occurs via insertion if an ISAba1 (or ISAba125) upstream of the chromosomal ampC gene, which provides the gene with a strong promoter enhancing the suppression level and, therefore, high levels of resistance to third-generation cephalosporins, as well as resistance to beta-lactam inhibitors, like sulbactam [56]. This occurs either via the classic insertion of ISAba1 upstream of the chromosomal ampC gene or as indicated above, by an acquisition of an exogenous DNA segment containing an ISAba1-activated ampC gene via homologous recombination replacing large segments of the chromosome [36].

Resistance to aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones

Aminoglycoside resistance occurs by the acquisition of genes encoding different families of aminoglycoside modifying enzymes often carried by composite Tns (e.g., Tn6020 carrying the aphA1 kanamycin, neomycin, and gentamicin resistance gene) or gene cassettes (e.g., the aacC1 gentamicin resistance gene found on class 1 integrons) in major global clones (ST1 and ST2) [16,57].

Fluoroquinolone resistance is mainly due to the generation of point mutations in the active sites of the gyrA and parC genes that encode the cell’s DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV enzymes, which are required for cell replication and survival. Mutations often occur by fluoroquinolone selective pressure. However, mutations can also be obtained via the acquisition of DNA segments—that include the mutations—by HR from an exogenous source (a strain that belongs to a different ST) [37].

Complex evolutionary pathways lead to multiple antibiotic resistance gene acquisitions combined with the global spread of resistant clones

The literature on antibiotic resistance of A. baumannii commonly highlights that A. baumannii has an incredible ability to develop resistance to many antibiotics. Although true, a major driver of resistance is also due to the clonal global expansion of successful resistant strain. Notably, while new resistant clones are emerging and isolates are continually gaining resistance genes, the bulk of the global MDR A. baumannii infections are still due to a few successful clones that are disseminated globally, typically those belonging to global clones GC1 (represented by ST1) and GC2 (represented by ST2) and a few additional sequence types, e.g., ST10, ST15, ST79, and ST85 [4]. Those belonging to ST15, ST25, ST79, and ST85 are important and most prevalent in certain geographical regions (e.g., ST85 in the Middle East or ST79 in South America) [4,5864]. It is important to note that multidrug resistance is often the result of the accumulation of a characteristic suite of antibiotic resistance genes for each clone, which then spreads. For example, clone-specific GIs often carry multiple resistance genes and insert into the chromosomes rendering cells resistant to several antibiotics in a single event. In contrast, nonspecific (shared) resistance elements (Tn, GI, plasmids, etc.) can be incorporated into both the chromosomes and plasmids and help accumulate the resistance genes leading to a complex picture. For example, it has been shown that AbaR-type islands (with several resistance genes) entered a single member of global clone 1 (GC1) in the mid-1970s (before it was globally distributed) and continued to evolve in situ forming many variants [16]. Thus, at least in ST1 strains, multi-, extensive-, and pan-drug resistance is the result of many acquisition/deletion events initiated by the acquisition of GIs, and other resistance determinants via homologous recombination providing the huge selective advantage to spread globally, followed by additional decorations of subsequent Tns or plasmids that carry carbapenem resistance genes. Several other globally distributed sequence types (ST2, ST25, ST79, and ST85) have also achieved multiply-extensive and pan-drug resistance phenotypes through completely different evolutionary paths. However, they share a common feature in which gene acquisition, either via MGEs or homologous recombination, and single base mutations, or mutation acquisition via homologous recombination, play a pivotal role in driving the resistance phenomenon.

It should be emphasised that in addition to numerous clever intrinsic and acquired mechanisms, the global spread of few highly successful clones and their lineages drive A. baumannii into becoming the globally successful and near-impossible-to-treat pathogen than it is today.

Together with the current lack of new antibiotics to treat resistant strains combined with the uncertainty about the discovery and effectiveness of new antibiotics, improved infection control policies, increased surveillance, and new treatment strategies are urgently needed. This requires a concerted global effort by researchers, healthcare professionals, policymakers, and governments.

Acknowledgments

We’d like to thank Prof Ian Paulsen, Department of Molecular Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia, for valuable discussions and guidance.

References

  1. 1. Rice LB. Federal funding for the study of antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial pathogens: no ESKAPE. J Infect Dis. 2008;197(8):1079–1081. pmid:18419525
  2. 2. Spellberg B, Rex JH. The value of single-pathogen antibacterial agents. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;12(12):963. pmid:24232373
  3. 3. Zarrilli R, Pournaras S, Giannouli M, Tsakris A. Global evolution of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clonal lineages. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2013;41(1):11–19. pmid:23127486
  4. 4. Hamidian M, Nigro SJ. Emergence, molecular mechanisms and global spread of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Microb Genom. 2019;5(10):e000306. pmid:31599224
  5. 5. Nigro SJ, Hall RM. Structure and context of Acinetobacter transposons carrying the oxa23 carbapenemase gene. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71(5):1135–1147. pmid:26755496
  6. 6. WHO. Global priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria to guide research, discovery, and development of new antibiotics. World Health Organisation (WHO); 2017.
  7. 7. Post V, White PA, Hall RM. Evolution of AbaR-type genomic resistance islands in multiply antibiotic-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65(6):1162–1170. pmid:20375036
  8. 8. Post V, Hall RM. AbaR5, a large multiple-antibiotic resistance region found in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(6):2667–2671. pmid:19364869
  9. 9. Nigro SJ, Hall RM. Loss and gain of aminoglycoside resistance in global clone 2 Acinetobacter baumannii in Australia via modification of genomic resistance islands and acquisition of plasmids. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71(9):2432–2440. pmid:27246238
  10. 10. Adams MD, Chan ER, Molyneaux ND, Bonomo RA. Genomewide analysis of divergence of antibiotic resistance determinants in closely related isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(9):3569–3577. pmid:20530228
  11. 11. Adams MD, Goglin K, Molyneaux N, Hujer KM, Lavender H, Jamison JJ, et al. Comparative genome sequence analysis of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. J Bacteriol. 2008;190(24):8053–8064. pmid:18931120
  12. 12. Shinohara DR, Dos Santos Saalfeld SM, Martinez HV, Altafini DD, Costa BB, Fedrigo NH, et al. Outbreak of endemic carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-specific intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021:1–3.
  13. 13. Pascale R, Bussini L, Gaibani P, Bovo F, Fornaro G, Lombardo D, et al. Carbapenem resistant bacteria in Intensive care unit during COVID-19 pandemic: multicenter before-after cross sectional study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021:1–25.
  14. 14. Lai CC, Chen SY, Ko WC, Hsueh PR. Increased antimicrobial resistance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021;57(4):106324. pmid:33746045
  15. 15. Perez S, Innes GK, Walters MS, Mehr J, Arias J, Greeley R, et al. Increase in hospital-acquired carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infection and Colonization in an acute care hospital during a surge in COVID-19 admissions—New Jersey, February-July 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(48):1827–1831. pmid:33270611
  16. 16. Hamidian M, Hall RM. The AbaR antibiotic resistance islands found in Acinetobacter baumannii global clone 1—Structure, origin and evolution. Drug Resist Updat. 2018;41:26–39. pmid:30472242
  17. 17. Nigro SJ, Farrugia DN, Paulsen IT, Hall RM. A novel family of genomic resistance islands, AbGRI2, contributing to aminoglycoside resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii isolates belonging to global clone 2. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68(3):554–557. pmid:23169892
  18. 18. Hua X, Moran RA, Xu Q, He J, Fang Y, Zhang L, et al. Acquisition of a genomic resistance island (AbGRI5) from global clone 2 through homologous recombination in a clinical Acinetobacter baumannii isolate. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021;76(1):65–69. pmid:33057672
  19. 19. Chan AP, Choi Y, Clarke TH, Brinkac LM, White RC, Jacobs MR, et al. AbGRI4, a novel antibiotic resistance island in multiply antibiotic-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020;75(10):2760–2768. pmid:32681170
  20. 20. Blackwell GA, Holt KE, Bentley SD, Hsu LY, Hall RM. Variants of AbGRI3 carrying the armA gene in extensively antibiotic-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii from Singapore. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(4):1031–1039. pmid:28073968
  21. 21. Nigro SJ, Hall RM. Tn6167, an antibiotic resistance island in an Australian carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii GC2, ST92 isolate. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(6):1342–1346. pmid:22351684
  22. 22. Mann R, Rafei R, Gunawan C, Harmer CJ, Hamidian M. Variants of Tn6924, a novel Tn7 family transposon carrying the blaNDM Metallo-β-Lactamase and 14 copies of the aphA6 amikacin resistance genes found in Acinetobacter baumannii. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(1):e0174521.
  23. 23. Brito BP, Koong J, Wozniak A, Opazo-Capurro A, Joyce T, Patricia G, et al. Genomic analysis of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains recovered from Chilean hospitals reveals lineages specific to South America and multiple routes for ccquisition of antibiotic resistance genes. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10:e0246322.
  24. 24. Lam MMC, Koong J, Holt KE, Hall RM, Hamidian M. Detection and typing of plasmids in Acinetobacter baumannii using rep genes encoding replication initiation proteins. bioRxiv. 2022:2022.08.26.505409. pmid:36472426
  25. 25. Hamidian M, Nigro SJ, Hall RM. Variants of the gentamicin and tobramycin resistance plasmid pRAY are widely distributed in Acinetobacter. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(12):2833–2836. pmid:22888272
  26. 26. Hamidian M, Holt KE, Pickard D, Dougan G, Hall RM. A GC1 Acinetobacter baumannii isolate carrying AbaR3 and the aminoglycoside resistance transposon TnaphA6 in a conjugative plasmid. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69(4):955–958. pmid:24235096
  27. 27. Hamidian M, Kenyon JJ, Holt KE, Pickard D, Hall RM. A conjugative plasmid carrying the carbapenem resistance gene blaOXA-23 in AbaR4 in an extensively resistant GC1 Acinetobacter baumannii isolate. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69(10):2625–2628. pmid:24907141
  28. 28. Nigro SJ, Holt KE, Pickard D, Hall RM. Carbapenem and amikacin resistance on a large conjugative Acinetobacter baumannii plasmid. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70(4):1259–1261. pmid:25433005
  29. 29. Hamidian M, Ambrose SJ, Hall RM. A large conjugative Acinetobacter baumannii plasmid carrying the sul2 sulphonamide and strAB streptomycin resistance genes. Plasmid. 2016;87–88:43–50. pmid:27601280
  30. 30. Nigro SJ, Hall RM. A large plasmid, pD46-4, carrying a complex resistance region in an extensively antibiotic-resistant ST25 Acinetobacter baumannii. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(12):3496–3498. pmid:28961764
  31. 31. Di Venanzio G, Flores-Mireles AL, Calix JJ, Haurat MF, Scott NE, Palmer LD, et al. Urinary tract colonization is enhanced by a plasmid that regulates uropathogenic Acinetobacter baumannii chromosomal genes. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):2763. pmid:31235751
  32. 32. Jones NI, Harmer CJ, Hamidian M, Hall RM. Evolution of Acinetobacter baumannii plasmids carrying the oxa58 carbapenemase resistance gene via plasmid fusion, IS26-mediated events and dif module shuffling. Plasmid. 2022;121:102628. pmid:35288116
  33. 33. Hanage WP, Fraser C, Spratt BG. The impact of homologous recombination on the generation of diversity in bacteria. J Theor Biol. 2006;239(2):210–219. pmid:16236325
  34. 34. Vos M. Why do bacteria engage in homologous recombination? Trends Microbiol. 2009;17(6):226–232. pmid:19464181
  35. 35. Hamidian M, Hall RM. ISAba1 targets a specific position upstream of the intrinsic ampC gene of Acinetobacter baumannii leading to cephalosporin resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68(11):2682–2683. pmid:23788477
  36. 36. Hamidian M, Hall RM. Resistance to third-generation cephalosporins in Acinetobacter baumannii due to horizontal transfer of a chromosomal segment containing ISAba1-ampC. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69(10):2865–2866. pmid:24917581
  37. 37. Hamidian M, Hawkey J, Wick R, Holt KE, Hall RM. Evolution of a clade of Acinetobacter baumannii global clone 1, lineage 1 via acquisition of carbapenem- and aminoglycoside-resistance genes and dispersion of ISAba1. Microb Genom. 2019;5(1):e000242. pmid:30648939
  38. 38. Naidu V, Bartczak A, Brzoska AJ, Lewis P, Eijkelkamp BA, Paulsen IT, et al. Evolution of RND efflux pumps in the development of a successful pathogen. Drug Resist Updat. 2023;66:100911. pmid:36592567
  39. 39. Abdi SN, Ghotaslou R, Ganbarov K, Mobed A, Tanomand A, Yousefi M, et al. Acinetobacter baumannii Efflux Pumps and Antibiotic Resistance. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;13:423–434. pmid:32104014
  40. 40. Kornelsen V, Kumar A. Update on Multidrug Resistance Efflux Pumps in Acinetobacter spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021;65(7):e0051421. pmid:33903107
  41. 41. Marchand I, Damier-Piolle L, Courvalin P, Lambert T. Expression of the RND-type efflux pump AdeABC in Acinetobacter baumannii is regulated by the AdeRS two-component system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(9):3298–3304. pmid:15328088
  42. 42. Higgins PG, Wisplinghoff H, Stefanik D, Seifert H. Selection of topoisomerase mutations and overexpression of adeB mRNA transcripts during an outbreak of Acinetobacter baumannii. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004;54(4):821–823. pmid:15355942
  43. 43. Jo J, Ko KS. Tigecycline Heteroresistance and Resistance Mechanism in Clinical Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. Microbiol Spectr. 2021;9(2):e0101021. pmid:34523993
  44. 44. Sun C, Yu Y, Hua X. Resistance mechanisms of tigecycline in Acinetobacter baumannii. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;13:1141490. pmid:37228666
  45. 45. Adams FG, Stroeher UH, Hassan KA, Marri S, Brown MH. Resistance to pentamidine is mediated by AdeAB, regulated by AdeRS, and influenced by growth conditions in Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 17978. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(5):e0197412. pmid:29750823
  46. 46. Martínez-Trejo A, Ruiz-Ruiz JM, Gonzalez-Avila LU, Saldaña-Padilla A, Hernández-Cortez C, Loyola-Cruz MA, et al. Evasion of Antimicrobial Activity in Acinetobacter baumannii by Target Site Modifications: An Effective Resistance Mechanism. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(12):6582. pmid:35743027
  47. 47. Moffatt JH, Harper M, Adler B, Nation RL, Li J, Boyce JD. Insertion sequence ISAba11 is involved in colistin resistance and loss of lipopolysaccharide in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(6):3022–3024. pmid:21402838
  48. 48. Moffatt Jennifer H, Harper M, Harrison P, Hale John DF, Vinogradov E, Seemann T, et al. Colistin Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii Is Mediated by Complete Loss of Lipopolysaccharide Production. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(12):4971–4977. pmid:20855724
  49. 49. Sharma S, Banerjee T, Yadav G, Palandurkar K. Mutations at Novel Sites in pmrA/B and lpxA/D Genes and Absence of Reduced Fitness in Colistin-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii from a Tertiary Care Hospital, India Microb Drug Resist. 2021;27(5):628–636.
  50. 50. Boinett CJ, Cain AK, Hawkey J, Do Hoang NT, Khanh NNT, Thanh DP, et al. Clinical and laboratory-induced colistin-resistance mechanisms in Acinetobacter baumannii. Microb Genom. 2019;5(2):e000246. pmid:30720421
  51. 51. Nodari Carolina S, Fuchs Sebastian A, Xanthopoulou K, Cayô R, Seifert H, Gales Ana C, et al. pmrCAB Recombination Events among Colistin-Susceptible and -Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates Belonging to International Clone 7. mSphere. 2021;6(6):e00746–21. pmid:34851165
  52. 52. Giles SK, Stroeher UH, Papudeshi B, Edwards RA, Carlson-Jones JA, Roach M, et al. The StkSR Two-Component System Influences Colistin Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Microorganisms. 2022;10(5):985. pmid:35630428
  53. 53. Srisakul S, Wannigama DL, Higgins PG, Hurst C, Abe S, Hongsing P, et al. Overcoming addition of phosphoethanolamine to lipid A mediated colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates with colistin–sulbactam combination therapy. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):11390. pmid:35794134
  54. 54. Charretier Y, Diene Seydina M, Baud D, Chatellier S, Santiago-Allexant E, van Belkum A, et al. Colistin Heteroresistance and Involvement of the PmrAB Regulatory System in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62(9):e00788–18. pmid:29914966
  55. 55. Lima WG, Alves MC, Cruz WS, Paiva MC. Chromosomally encoded and plasmid-mediated polymyxins resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: a huge public health threat. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018;37(6):1009–1019. pmid:29524060
  56. 56. Yang Y, Fu Y, Lan P, Xu Q, Jiang Y, Chen Y, et al. Molecular Epidemiology and Mechanism of Sulbactam Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates with Diverse Genetic Backgrounds in China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62(3):e01947–17. pmid:29311074
  57. 57. Nigro SJ, Post V, Hall RM. Aminoglycoside resistance in multiply antibiotic-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii belonging to global clone 2 from Australian hospitals. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(7):1504–1509. pmid:21586593
  58. 58. Cifuentes S, Moura Q, Cardoso B, Esposito F, Cerdeira L, Álvarez E, et al. Genomic features of a carbapenem-resistant OXA-219-positive Acinetobacter baumannii of international ST15 (CC15) from a patient with community-onset urinary tract infection in Chilean Patagonia. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020;22:756–8. pmid:32712382
  59. 59. da Silva KE, Maciel WG, Croda J, Cayô R, Ramos AC, de Sales RO, et al. A high mortality rate associated with multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii ST79 and ST25 carrying OXA-23 in a Brazilian intensive care unit. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(12):e0209367. pmid:30592758
  60. 60. Fernández-Cuenca F, Pérez-Palacios P, Galán-Sánchez F, López-Cerero L, López-Hernández I, López Rojas R, et al. First identification of bla(NDM-1) carbapenemase in bla(OXA-94)-producing Acinetobacter baumannii ST85 in Spain. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2020;38(1):11–15. pmid:31060865
  61. 61. Hamidian M, Hall RM. The resistance gene complement of D4, a multiply antibiotic-resistant ST25 Acinetobacter baumannii isolate, resides in two genomic islands and a plasmid. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71(6):1730–1732. pmid:26944923
  62. 62. Heydari F, Mammina C, Koksal F. NDM-1-producing Acinetobacter baumannii ST85 now in Turkey, including one isolate from a Syrian refugee. J Med Microbiol. 2015;64(9):1027–1029. pmid:26296677
  63. 63. Jaidane N, Naas T, Oueslati S, Bernabeu S, Boujaafar N, Bouallegue O, et al. Whole-genome sequencing of NDM-1-producing ST85 Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from Tunisia. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018;52(6):916–921. pmid:29857033
  64. 64. Opazo-Capurro A, San Martín I, Quezada-Aguiluz M, Morales-León F, Domínguez-Yévenes M, Lima CA, et al. Evolutionary dynamics of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii circulating in Chilean hospitals. Infect Genet Evol. 2019;73:93–97. pmid:31029791