Peer Review History

Original SubmissionOctober 22, 2025
Decision Letter - Yong-Hui Zheng, Editor

SAMHD1 promotes SARS-CoV-2 infection by enhancing HNF1-dependent ACE2 expression in lung epithelial cells

PLOS Pathogens

Dear Dr. Wu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Pathogens. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Pathogens's publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 15 2026 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plospathogens@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/ppathogens/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

* A letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. This file does not need to include responses to any formatting updates and technical items listed in the 'Journal Requirements' section below.

* A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

* An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, competing interests statement, or data availability statement, please make these updates within the submission form at the time of resubmission. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Yong-Hui Zheng, Ph.D.

Guest Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Alexander Gorbalenya

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0003-2946-9497

Michael Malim

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Additional Editor Comments :

Below comments from Reviewer #1 are very helpful and constructive, they should be addressed by providing new results:

1. In Figure 3B, E RNA is increased in the KO1 and KO2 cells at 24h. This is not addressed in the text. As shown in Figure S1, KO1 and KO2 have elevated dATP levels (and possibly other dNTPs). This could be due to increased dNTP levels in the cells. What happens to SARS-CoV-2 infection and ACE2/TMPRSS2 expression if dNTP levels are artificially increased independent of SAMHD1 expression (i.e., without SAMHD1 knockout)?

2. Given that SARS-CoV-2 infects other epithelial cell lines, it would be worth validating some of these results (SARS-CoV-2 replication and ACE2 protein expression) in at least one other cell line or in primary epithelial cells to ensure that this is not a Calu-3 specific effect.

3. For western blots (Figures 2F, 3C, 4D, 6E), only one experiment is shown. For rigor and reproducibility and because conclusions are based on these results, these experiments should be repeated and the results graphed with error bars and statistics similar to what was done for Figures 7 and 8.

Journal Requirements:

1) Please ensure that the CRediT author contributions listed for every co-author are completed accurately and in full.

At this stage, the following Authors/Authors require contributions: Pak-Hin Hinson Cheung, Pearl Chan, Hua Yang, Shravya Honne, Baek Kim, Stanley Perlman, and Li Wu. Please ensure that the full contributions of each author are acknowledged in the "Add/Edit/Remove Authors" section of our submission form.

The list of CRediT author contributions may be found here: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/s/authorship#loc-author-contributions

2) We do not publish any copyright or trademark symbols that usually accompany proprietary names, eg ©,  ®, or TM  (e.g. next to drug or reagent names). Therefore please remove all instances of trademark/copyright symbols throughout the text, including:

- ® on pages: 29, and 33

- TM on pages: 29, 31, 32, and 52.

3) Please upload all main figures as separate Figure files in .tif or .eps format. For more information about how to convert and format your figure files please see our guidelines:

https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/s/figures

4) We notice that your supplementary figures are uploaded with the file type 'Figure'. Please upload them separately with the file type  'Supporting Information'. Please ensure that each Supporting Information file has a legend listed in the manuscript after the references list.

5) Some material included in your submission may be copyrighted. According to PLOSu2019s copyright policy, authors who use figures or other material (e.g., graphics, clipart, maps) from another author or copyright holder must demonstrate or obtain permission to publish this material under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License used by PLOS journals. Please closely review the details of PLOSu2019s copyright requirements here: PLOS Licenses and Copyright. If you need to request permissions from a copyright holder, you may use PLOS's Copyright Content Permission form.

Please respond directly to this email and provide any known details concerning your material's license terms and permissions required for reuse, even if you have not yet obtained copyright permissions or are unsure of your material's copyright compatibility. Once you have responded and addressed all other outstanding technical requirements, you may resubmit your manuscript within Editorial Manager.

Potential Copyright Issues:

i) Figure 9. Please confirm whether you drew the images / clip-art within the figure panels by hand. If you did not draw the images, please provide (a) a link to the source of the images or icons and their license / terms of use; or (b) written permission from the copyright holder to publish the images or icons under our CC BY 4.0 license. Alternatively, you may replace the images with open source alternatives. See these open source resources you may use to replace images / clip-art:

- https://commons.wikimedia.org

- https://openclipart.org/.

6) Please update your Data Availability Statement in the online submission form to include the accession number of the dataset OR a direct link to access the dataset.

7)  Please ensure that the funders and grant numbers match between the Financial Disclosure field and the Funding Information tab in your submission form. Note that the funders must be provided in the same order in both places as well. Currently, the order of the grants is not exactly the same in both places.

8) Please revise your current Competing Interest statement to the standard "The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.".

Note: If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

Reviewers' Comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: Cheung et al. demonstrate that SAMHD1 mediates ACE2 protein expression in Calu-3 cells via transcription factors HNF1a and HNF1b. If the SAMHD1 gene is knocked out in Calu-3 cells or if protein levels of HNF1s are depleted, SARS-CoV-2 infection is significantly reduced. This function is independent of IFN signaling/production. The data reflect the conclusions and were overall compelling and novel. However, SAMHD1 KO leads to increased dATP levels in Calu-3 cells and this phenotype was not characterized for its potential role in ACE2 expression or SARS-CoV-2 infection. Investigation of dNTP levels would strengthen the study.

Reviewer #2: In the manuscript entitled "SAMHD1 Promotes SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Enhancing HNF1-Dependent ACE2 Expression in Lung Epithelial Cells, the authors generated two SAMHD1 knockout (KO) Calu-3 cell clones (KO1 and KO2) and demonstrated that SAMHD1 acts as a proviral factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection. First, they showed that SARS-CoV-2 replication was suppressed in SAMHD1 KO Calu-3 cells, independent of IFN signaling. Second, they confirmed that SAMHD1 supports spike (S) protein-mediated viral entry by maintaining ACE2 expression. Finally, they discovered that HNF1-dependent ACE2 expression was suppressed in SAMHD1 KO Calu-3 cells. In summary, this study reveals a novel function and mechanism of SAMHD1 in supporting SARS-CoV-2 infection in Calu-3 cells. The manuscript is well-structured and clearly presented. The reviewer has several comments.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: 1. In Figure 3B, E RNA is increased in the KO1 and KO2 cells at 24h. This is not addressed in the text. As shown in Figure S1, KO1 and KO2 have elevated dATP levels (and possibly other dNTPs). This could be due to increased dNTP levels in the cells. What happens to SARS-CoV-2 infection and ACE2/TMPRSS2 expression if dNTP levels are artificially increased independent of SAMHD1 expression (i.e., without SAMHD1 knockout)?

2. Given that SARS-CoV-2 infects other epithelial cell lines, it would be worth validating some of these results (SARS-CoV-2 replication and ACE2 protein expression) in at least one other cell line or in primary epithelial cells to ensure that this is not a Calu-3 specific effect.

3. For western blots (Figures 2F, 3C, 4D, 6E), only one experiment is shown. For rigor and reproducibility and because conclusions are based on these results, these experiments should be repeated and the results graphed with error bars and statistics similar to what was done for Figures 7 and 8.

Reviewer #2: There are three moderate issues noted during the review of this manuscript. The authors are welcome to address them by experiments or detailed discussion.

1. Based on the results of this study, the authors suggested that SAMHD1 expression promotes S protein-mediated viral entry, thereby facilitating infection by authentic SARS-CoV-2. To confirm this finding, the authors should test whether overexpression of SAMHD1 in Ctrl cells further enhances SARS-CoV-2 infection, and whether complementation of SAMHD1 in KO1 or KO2 cells restores SARS-CoV-2 infection.

2. In Figure 5, the reviewer observed that the result curves deviated from specific numerical points. How did the authors generate these figure panels? Please provide more details and make the necessary changes accordingly.

3. Similar to the first major comment, the authors could assess whether overexpression of HNF1α or HNF1β in Calu-3 cells further enhances ACE2 levels and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Additionally, complementation of HNF1α or HNF1β in KO1 or KO2 cells could restore ACE2 levels and SARS-CoV-2 infection.

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: 1. Line 20: should be “broad” instead of “board”

2. It is unclear what sgRNA control was used for the SAMHD1 KO in Calu-3 cells. Is this a sgRNA that recognizes a nonhuman gene? Or no sgRNA?

3. Lines 114, 529, 1177: Sanger should be capitalized.

4. Line 1063 and Fig 2B: confirm that “copy number” refers to viral RNA copy number.

5. Lines 192-193: as written, this sentence suggests that KO1 and KO2 cells are clustered together, which is not the case and this should be rewritten.

6. Line 194: it is unclear what is meant by “which however minimally distinguished”.

7. Verb tenses (present vs. past tense) fluctuate throughout the manuscript, which makes it difficult to read.

Reviewer #2: 1. In this study, the authors confirmed that SAMHD1 supports SARS-CoV-2 infection by maintaining HNF-1-dependent ACE2 expression in Calu-3 cells. The authors may consider using the current title, “SAMHD1 promotes SARS-CoV-2 infection by enhancing HNF1-dependent ACE2 expression in lung epithelial cells,” to reflect the results from the overexpression and complementation experiments.

2. Line 105, what is the “HD” domain? Please provide the full name of “HD” when it first appears in the main text.

3. Line 239, the subtitle “SAMHD1 expression does not affect ACE2 mRNA stability” should be changed to “SAMHD1 KO does not affect ACE2 mRNA stability.”

4. Line 274, please provide the full name of “GATA6” when it first shows in the main text. Similarly, there were other unexplained abbreviations that the reviewer did not list. Please make changes carefully.

5. Lines 23-24: The description “Some viruses escape SAMHD1 restriction by utilizing SAMHD1-mediated innate immune suppression to establish effective infection through viral antagonism” is confused. Please revise it for clarity.

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

Figure resubmission:

Reproducibility:

?>

Revision 1

Attachments
Attachment
Submitted filename: Responses to Reviwers final.pdf
Decision Letter - Yong-Hui Zheng, Editor

Dear Prof. Wu,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'SAMHD1 depletion restricts SARS-CoV-2 infection by suppressing HNF1-dependent ACE2 expression in lung epithelial cells' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Yong-Hui Zheng, Ph.D.

Guest Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Alexander Gorbalenya

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Sumita Bhaduri-McIntosh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0003-2946-9497

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: Cheung et al. demonstrate that SAMHD1 mediates ACE2 protein expression in Calu-3 cells via transcription factors HNF1a and HNF1b. In Calu-3 cells, SAMHD1 gene knock out, higher dNTP concentrations and HNF1a/b protein depletion lead to significantly reduced SARS-CoV-2 infection. This function is independent of IFN signaling/production. The data reflect the conclusions and were overall compelling and novel.

Reviewer #2: The authors have responded my questions well and all major issues from this reviewer were addressed well.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: None

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: None

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Formally Accepted
Acceptance Letter - Yong-Hui Zheng, Editor

Dear Prof. Wu,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "SAMHD1 depletion restricts SARS-CoV-2 infection by suppressing HNF1-dependent ACE2 expression in lung epithelial cells," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

For Research Articles, you will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Sumita Bhaduri-McIntosh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0003-2946-9497

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Open letter on the publication of peer review reports

PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.

We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.

Learn more at ASAPbio .