Reader Comments

Post a new comment on this article

A note to the readers of this article from the corresponding author

Posted by hshu539 on 10 Apr 2021 at 02:37 GMT

The numbers of mice described in Fig 3A&B are inaccurate. The corrected description is "n=9" in Fig 3A and "n=11" in Fig 3B. The results and conclusions are not affected.

In the SI Materials and Methods, there are typos in the qPCR primers for GAPDH and IFNB1. The actual primers were correct. The corrected primer information is:
GAPDH:GAGTCAACGGATTTGGTCGT (forward) and GACAAGCTTCCCGTTCTCAG (reverse).
IFNB1:TTGTTGAGAACCTCCTGGCT (forward) and TGACTATGGTCCAGGCACAG (reverse).

No competing interests declared.