Figures
There is an error in Fig 3. The row labels for rows 4 and 5 were ordered incorrectly: the label for row 4 should read ‘B/Victoria’ and the label for row 5 should read ‘B/Yamagata’. Please see the correct Fig 3 here.
The interaction between exposure history h and susceptibility to strain m in the current influenza season, f(h, m), was classified into ten distinct groups: One group for the naive (uninfected and not vaccinated, row 1); one group per strain, infected but not vaccinated (rows 2–5); one group for those vaccinated and experiencing no natural infection (row 6); one group per strain for being infected and vaccinated (rows 7–10). We let a denote modified susceptibility to strain m given infection by a strain m type virus the previous influenza season (dark green shading), b modified susceptibility due to cross-reactivity between type B influenza lineages (dark blue shading), and cm the change in susceptibility to strain m given vaccination in the previous influenza season (gold shading). Unmodified susceptibilities retained a value of 1 (red shading). We enforced 0 < a,b,cm < 1.
Reference
- 1. Hill EM, Petrou S, de Lusignan S, Yonova I, Keeling MJ (2019) Seasonal influenza: Modelling approaches to capture immunity propagation. PLoS Comput Biol 15(10): e1007096. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007096 pmid:31658250
Citation: Hill EM, Petrou S, de Lusignan S, Yonova I, Keeling MJ (2024) Correction: Seasonal influenza: Modelling approaches to capture immunity propagation. PLoS Comput Biol 20(6): e1012213. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012213
Published: June 13, 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Hill et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.