There are a number of errors in the caption for S1 Fig. The publisher apologizes for the errors. Please see the correct S1 Fig caption here.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Simulations of the elongation pathway.
Each point is a single simulation of the full rpoB gene (4029 nt). Parameters on the x- and y-axis are sampled uniformly at random from the displayed range at the beginning of each trial. The z-axis of each plot (mean elongation velocity) is then measured from the respective simulation. [NTP] and F held constant at 1000 μM and 0 pN respectively. (A): Relationship between and kcat with binding at equilibrium (Model 8). (B) Relationship between kbind and kcat for the kinetic binding model with translocation at equilibrium (Model 2). (C) Relationship between KD and kbind with translocation held at equilibrium (Model 2). KD and kbind sampled uniformly from specified range and velocity is measured. Samples with simulated velocities outside of the range 0.1–0.2 bp/s were discarded. [NTP] = 10 μM and kcat = 100 s−1.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009314.s001
(PDF)
Reference
- 1. Douglas J, Kingston R, Drummond AJ (2020) Bayesian inference and comparison of stochastic transcription elongation models. PLoS Comput Biol 16(2): e1006717. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006717 pmid:32059006
Citation: The PLOS Computational Biology Staff (2021) Correction: Bayesian inference and comparison of stochastic transcription elongation models. PLoS Comput Biol 17(8): e1009314. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009314
Published: August 11, 2021
Copyright: © 2021 The PLOS Computational Biology Staff. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.