Abstract
Metastability in the brain is thought to be a mechanism involved in the dynamic organization of cognitive and behavioral functions across multiple spatiotemporal scales. However, it is not clear how such organization is realized in underlying neural oscillations in a high-dimensional state space. It was shown that macroscopic oscillations often form phase-phase coupling (PPC) and phase-amplitude coupling (PAC), which result in synchronization and amplitude modulation, respectively, even without external stimuli. These oscillations can also make spontaneous transitions across synchronous states at rest. Using resting-state electroencephalographic signals and the autism-spectrum quotient scores acquired from healthy humans, we show experimental evidence that the PAC combined with PPC allows amplitude modulation to be transient, and that the metastable dynamics with this transient modulation is associated with autistic-like traits. In individuals with a longer attention span, such dynamics tended to show fewer transitions between states by forming delta-alpha PAC. We identified these states as two-dimensional metastable states that could share consistent patterns across individuals. Our findings suggest that the human brain dynamically organizes inter-individual differences in a hierarchy of macroscopic oscillations with multiple timescales by utilizing metastability.
Author summary
The human brain organizes cognitive and behavioral functions dynamically. For decades, the dynamic organization of underlying neural oscillations has been a fundamental topic in neuroscience research. Even without external stimuli, macroscopic oscillations often form phase-phase coupling and phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) that result in synchronization and amplitude modulation, respectively, and can make spontaneous transitions across synchronous states at rest. Using resting-state electroencephalography signals acquired from healthy humans, we show evidence that these two neural couplings enable amplitude modulation to be transient, and that this transient modulation can be viewed as the transition among oscillatory states with different PAC strengths. We also demonstrate that such transition dynamics are associated with the ability to maintain attention to detail and to switch attention, as measured by autism-spectrum quotient scores. These individual dynamics were visualized as a trajectory among states with attracting tendencies, and involved consistent brain states across individuals. Our findings have significant implications for unraveling the variability in the individual brains showing typical and atypical development.
Figures
Citation: Sase T, Kitajo K (2021) The metastable brain associated with autistic-like traits of typically developing individuals. PLoS Comput Biol 17(4): e1008929. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008929
Editor: Boris S. Gutkin, École Normale Supérieure, College de France, CNRS, FRANCE
Received: February 19, 2020; Accepted: March 31, 2021; Published: April 16, 2021
Copyright: © 2021 Sase, Kitajo. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data and code are available in OSF. https://osf.io/29qb5/ doi 10.17605/OSF.IO/29QB5.
Funding: KK was supported by a research grant from TOYOTA Motor Corporation. TOYOTA Motor Corporation played no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: KK was supported by a research grant from TOYOTA Motor Corporation.
Introduction
The human brain can spontaneously yield transition dynamics across oscillatory states and organize a variety of events in a hierarchy of oscillations. Such spontaneous dynamics, particularly at rest, have been intensively observed and analyzed over many years, and attempts to model them have been made using dynamical systems theory, to achieve a better prediction of brain activity [1–5]. However, there is a lack of direct evidence that resting-state brain dynamics can originate from the underlying nonlinear states, and little is known about the kind of states that may have functional roles in the dynamic organization of spontaneous activity in a way utilizing oscillatory hierarchy.
Electroencephalography (EEG) is a promising technique for the high temporal resolution observation of the dynamics of neural activity over large-scale brain networks. The observed macroscopic signals are oscillatory such that the corresponding power spectrum exhibits a representative peak, and are classified into multiple bands according to its frequency in general [6, 7]. The peak frequency of neural activity shows either a higher or lower value depending on brain function [6] and cognitive and behavioral performance [7]; for example, alpha-band activity can be enhanced or suppressed by attention, and its peak frequency can vary with age [7].
Observed macroscopic neural oscillations reflect underlying nonlinear dynamics. Experimental studies have presented evidence that phases detected from oscillations at a particular frequency show the nonlinear brain phenomenon called phase synchronization by forming phase-phase coupling (PPC) [8–10]. Furthermore, the phases have the ability to modulate the amplitude of a faster oscillatory component by forming phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) [11–15]; in recent years, PAC was observed not only locally but also between regions of the large-scale network [16, 17]. The PPC has been suggested to play a role in making functional connections among distant brain regions [8], while it is suggested that the PAC mediates computation between local and global networks [12], with both couplings having been observed in function-specific and individual behavior-related oscillations at multiple spatiotemporal scales [9, 14]. From a dynamical systems theory point of view, these two kinds of coupled oscillatory dynamics can be interpreted as being generated from coupled oscillatory attractors composed of the limit cycle [2] or its variant form, i.e., a torus in a high-dimensional state space [18, 19]. These suggestions have inspired phenomenological modeling of the dynamics underlying EEG neural oscillations [20, 21], resulting in a variety of coupled nonlinear-oscillator systems as represented by the Kuramoto model [20–23].
Oscillatory dynamics such as those mentioned above can make spontaneous transitions among multiple network states, particularly at rest. Previous studies labeled EEG signals observed during a resting condition as a small number of states called microstates [24–27]. These microstates have been suggested to be associated with cognition and perception [25], as well as individual differences in brain function [27]. In recent years, resting-state EEG signals have been investigated from the point of view of functional connectivity of the large-scale network, which is often characterized by the strength of the PPC [28–30]. Betzel et al. showed evidence that resting-state EEG phases exhibit dynamic changes in PPC modulation so that a repertoire of synchronized states appears [29]. Moreover, PAC modulation from EEG phases to amplitudes at rest was recently studied [31, 32] because the PAC can also occur spontaneously [13]; inter-regional PAC during rest was also intensively analyzed [33]. These experimental findings imply that resting-state EEG phase dynamics not only exhibit synchronization but also result in amplitude modulation over the large-scale network at the same time via both PPC and PAC. Therefore, we developed the following hypotheses for the resting brain: (i) there is a repertoire of synchronous slow oscillations that interact via the PPC and interact with fast oscillations via the PAC (Fig 1A); (ii) these synchrony-dependent slow and fast oscillations result in a repertoire of PAC states characterized by slow and fast timescales (Fig 1B); and (iii) transitions between metastable PAC states, i.e., dynamic and large-scale changes in PAC strengths, occur spontaneously at rest according to transitions among a repertoire of the synchronous slow oscillations, that is, according to the dynamic changes in PPC strengths (Fig 1C).
(A) A repertoire of synchronous slow oscillations that interact via the PPC and interact with fast oscillations via the PAC. (B) The resulting PAC states. (C) Transitions between the metastable PAC states. The dynamic PPC-PAC hypothesis states that for the resting brain, dynamic changes in PPC strengths (transitions between synchronous states) can cause dynamic and large-scale changes in PAC strengths because of PPC-PAC connectivity (A), and thereby yield transitions between oscillatory states with multiple peak frequencies (B and C). The oscillations of each state can realize the transition to another state by spontaneous fluctuations in the brain; in other words, the underlying states can show metastability.
In this study, we aimed to test the dynamic PPC-PAC hypotheses described above (Fig 1), and to show experimental evidence of how the metastable human brain is associated with autistic-like traits. In recent years, metastability in the brain has been proposed as a mechanism for integration and segregation across multiple levels of brain functions [34]. To elucidate aspects of the dynamics of the metastable human brain in this study, we first developed a method to label observed metastable dynamics as the underlying states in a data-driven manner based on the oscillatory hierarchy hypothesis [35]. The method was then applied to 63-channel high-density scalp-recorded EEG signals from 130 healthy humans in an eyes-closed resting condition (n = 162 in total; 32 subjects participated in the experiment twice). The obtained results were compared with the autism-spectrum quotient (AQ) subscales [36, 37] acquired from 88 of the subjects after the EEG recording, and were combined with the model of a coupled oscillator system driven by spontaneous fluctuations to validate our hypothesis (Fig 1).
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
The study was approved by the ethics committee of RIKEN (the approval number: Wako3 26-24) and was conducted in accordance with the code of ethics of the Declaration of Helsinki. Subjects participated in the study after giving written informed consent.
Data acquisition
In total, 130 healthy humans (Age: 24.0 ± 5.0 years, mean ± SD, 66 females) participated in the EEG experiment. Thirty-two subjects participated in the experiment twice. The EEG signals were recorded from an EEG amplifier (BrainAmp MR+, Brain Products GmbH, Gilching, Germany) and a 63-channel EEG cap (Easycap, EASYCAP GmbH, Herrsching, Germany) placed on the scalp in accordance with the International 10/10 system with a left earlobe reference and AFz as a ground electrode. The signals were recorded for 180 s with the subjects in an eyes-closed resting condition. The following experimental configuration was used: sampling frequency 1000 Hz, low-cut frequency 0.016 Hz, and high-cut frequency 250 Hz. The recorded signals were offline re-referenced to the average potentials of the left and right earlobes. The EEG data were also analyzed in our previous studies [38, 39], which had a different purpose. After the EEG experiment, 88 subjects were asked to answer the Japanese version of the AQ questionnaire [37], which was originally constructed by Baron-Cohen et al. (2001) [36]. The following five AQ subscales were scored from the obtained answers: social skills, attention to detail, attention switching, communication, and imagination. All the analyses shown below were conducted using in-house code custom written in MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA) with the EEGLAB [40], FieldTrip [41], and CSD Toolboxes [42]. The code [43–45] was also used after minor changes.
Metastable states clustering
Metastable states clustering was developed in a data-driven manner to label observed metastable dynamics as the underlying states. The method consisted of the following three analyses: (i) multi-step envelope analysis, (ii) k-means clustering, and (iii) supervised dimensionality reduction of state space by linear discriminant analysis (LDA) [46] (see Fig 2). Analysis (i) was motivated by the Poincaré section in flows and sections in maps [47] with their application to a modeled neural network [18]; these sections enabled to convert a d-dimensional torus in a state space to the (d − 1)-dimensional torus recursively [47]. We incorporated this idea into signal processing of resting-state EEG data, and aimed to transform the original transition dynamics (Fig 2A) into a trajectory among zero-dimensional states (Fig 2D), to which the potential energy can be applied. In this study, we realized this multi-step conversion by repeatedly computing envelopes from EEG signals (Fig 2B). A vast amount of studies used such an envelope analysis so that the nested oscillations (with slow and fast timescales) changed to amplitude oscillations (with a slow timescale) [13, 48].
(A) A transition dynamics among three PAC states (d = 2) in the state space of xi(t) = cos(2πf1 t + ψi) + 0.5[1 + bi(t) cos(2πf1 t + ψi)] sin(2πf2 t) + ξi(t), where the first, second, and last terms indicated the slow oscillations, amplitude-modulated fast oscillations, and noise, respectively. (B) Observed signals, the first envelopes (instantaneous amplitudes) around f2, and the second envelopes around f1. (C) The labeled sequences. (D) LDA projections of the state space. (E) The bandpass signal of x1(t) around peak frequency f2 and corresponding labels. The frequencies f1 and f2 here were set to 1 Hz and 10 Hz, respectively; modulation index bi(t) dynamically changed among strengths 0.15, 0.5, and 0.85; and noise ξi(t) followed a normal distribution of mean 0 and standard deviation 0.3. The colors in panel A correspond to those in the right column of panels C to E.
The method was applied to the resting-state scalp EEG data with the dimension N = 63, under the assumption that (I) the underlying system generates the dynamics of transitions between states with d frequencies f1, f2, .., fd (changes in strengths of hierarchical coupling), such that slow oscillations with fi hierarchically modulate fast ones with fi+1 for i = 1, 2, …, d − 1 (see [35] for the oscillatory hierarchy hypothesis). Moreover, we assumed that (II) the observation process is the linear sum of distinct oscillations. These assumptions allowed the underlying states to be d-dimensional, and the N recorded EEG signals to reflect the common neural oscillations with d peak frequencies. Hereafter, we denoted these N signals by X(t) = (X1(t), X2(t), …, XN (t)) for t = 0 to 180 s (= T). As shown in the detailed signal processing steps below, analyses (i) to (iii) tested whether the resulting states can be seen as zero-dimensional states with attracting tendencies (which we called the weakly attracting states) after d-time computations of envelopes. In other words, we tested whether the states of the original transition dynamics can be d-dimensional metastable states. Fig 2 illustrates that the PAC states (Fig 2A) are identified as the two-dimensional metastable states through transformation into the zero-dimensional weakly attracting states (in Fig 2D), whose labels clearly reflect different strengths of amplitude modulation (in Fig 2E).
Analysis (i): First, the instantaneous amplitudes were repeatedly computed from signals X(t) around frequencies fd, fd−1, …, f1, as follows (Fig 2B): for i = 1, 2, …, N, where Ψd−1(t),Ψd−2(t),…,Ψ0(t) were the complex-valued Morlet wavelets [49, 50] defined as (4) for j = 0, 1, …, d − 1. Operators (⋅*⋅) and |⋅| denote a convolution and conversion from the complex value to its amplitude, respectively, and we defined Aj(t) = (A1, j(t), A2, j(t), …, AN, j(t)). To obtain the results at high temporal resolution, we set σj+1 to a value such that the number of cycles nco of the wavelet Ψj(t) was three, i.e., nco = 6 fiσj+1 = 3. The data Aj(t) for t = nco/2fj+1 to (T − nco/2fj+1) were used to reduce the edge artifact of the wavelet Ψj(t) with update T − nco/fj+1 → T, with respect to each j. The peak frequency fd and others fd−1, fd−2, …, f1 were estimated from the power spectra of Xi(t) and of Ai,d−1(t), Ai,d−2(t), …, Ai,1(t), respectively, for i = 1,2, …,N. We averaged each set of the spectra over i with respect to each frequency f, obtained a single spectrum, and estimated its peak frequency over the interval 1 ≤ f < 45 for X(t), otherwise in 0.1 ≤ f < fj+1 for Aj(t); for X(t) only, we first reduced the power-law effect on the corresponding spectra Pi(f) across i = 1, 2, …, N which may follow with certain exponents [51], respectively, by subtracting the linear trend from logPi(f) vs. logf with respect to each i.
Analysis (ii): Next, instantaneous amplitudes A0(t) were labeled as the K states of L(t)∈{1, 2, …, K} by k-means clustering (Fig 2C). The number of states K was estimated from the Calinski-Harabasz index [52] in a condition of K ∈ {2, 3, …, 10}. To obtain reproducible results, we deterministically initialized the clustering algorithm using PCA partitioning [53]. Any kernel function was not applied to the present clustering analysis because the dynamics A0(t) appeared here would play a role representing K states more discriminatorily in the N-dimensional state space compared with original dynamics X(t) (see Fig 2A and 2D).
Analysis (iii): Finally, the labeled amplitudes (A0(t), L(t)) were projected to lower-dimensional data Y(t) = (Y1(t),Y2(t), …,Ym(t)) with dimension m < N by LDA (Fig 2D). In this study, (A0(t), L(t)) was projected onto a plane (m = 2) for the case of K > 2, otherwise in a one-dimensional axis (m = 1) due to limitation of the LDA. We generated histograms with respect to each labeled state k ∈ {1, 2, …, K} using the same bin sizes, and calculated the maxima of the counts of bins Ek for each k. The statistics {Ek} can indicate higher values as states {1, 2, …, K} become stable (see Fig 2D), and were regarded as the indices for the attracting tendencies that could be proportional to the potential energy of state space. The statistic E = mink Ek was applied to the Fourier-transform (FT) surrogate data testing for multivariate time series [54] under the null hypothesis H0, where A0(t) is linearly correlated Gaussian noise. We generated surrogate data by randomizing the initial phases of A0(t), applied k-means clustering , converted the labeled data to lower-dimensional ones Y′(t) by the same projection as (A0(t), L(t)), and calculated the statistic E′ of the surrogate data. We performed a one-sided test to verify whether E was significantly larger than E′ by generating 200 surrogate data sets and setting the significance level to 0.05.
In summary, X(t) was converted into Y(t) using the following composite analysis: (i) the envelopes were repeatedly computed from 63-channel EEG signals d times (Fig 2B); (ii) the final envelopes were labeled as K clusters in the 63-dimensional space (Fig 2C); and (iii) these clusters were projected onto a two- or one-dimensional space in which we tested whether they showed attracting tendencies (Fig 2D). These analyses were performed in the conditions of d ∈ {0, 1, 2, 3}, and we tested which d can indicate the dimension of underlying states. For the case of d = 0 only, we first applied a band-pass filter to the raw EEG signals in a range between 1 and 45 Hz.
Dynamical systems modeling
We developed a model for individual transition dynamics, in which the dimension of underlying states was identified as two. The model was described by a coupled oscillator system driven by fluctuations, and was combined with the empirical results to validate the dynamic PPC-PAC hypothesis (Fig 1). The large-scale network with PPC-PAC connectivity was modeled in a space spanned by the 63 electrodes, and each node was represented by the phase of slow oscillations and the amplitude of fast oscillations (i.e., the PAC oscillator; S1 Fig). Inter-individual differences in the model were then taken into account through the PPC connectivity (see Fig 1A), which was estimated from the current source density (CSD) [42, 55] of the raw EEG signals X(t). Finally, we applied an observation operator h from CSD to EEG dynamics.
The signals X(t) (represented as the column vector hereafter) were applied to two (N × N)-matrices G and H and were transformed into CSD signals Im(t) as follows [42, 55, 56]: (5) (6) where (7) and the following spherical interpolation was used [55]: (8)
In Eq (6), c(t) and c0(t) are the spline coefficients, λ denotes the smoothing constant which was set to 10−5, and I denotes the identity matrix with size N. As seen in Eqs (5) to (8), Im(I) can be mapped to X(t) through observation h as follows: (9) under the assumption that c0(t) and the average potential in Eq (7) are zero. As shown in the Results, many of the individual transition dynamics were labeled as two-dimensional metastable states with delta-alpha PAC, and thus a coupled delta-alpha PAC oscillator system was constructed.
The model.
The delta-alpha PAC dynamics of Im(I) were modeled by a coupled oscillator system driven by fluctuations (S1 Fig). The model comprised N PAC oscillators whose phases and amplitudes corresponded to delta- (δ) and alpha-band (α) activity, respectively. We represented the ith oscillator at time t by delta-band phase ϕi (t) and alpha-band amplitude ri (t), its frequency by ω, and the fluctuation to this oscillator by ηi (t). The phases ϕj (t) have connections to ϕi (t) (PPC) for j ≠ i with coupling strengths and delay , and connections to amplitude ri (t) for both j = i and j ≠ i (local and inter-regional PAC) with coupling strengths and delay . The phase ϕi (t) has another connection from fluctuation ηi (t) with the level D. Then, the system with these three kinds of interactions can be described as follows: (10) (11) where kδ and kαδ denote the total coupling strength of the PPC and PAC, respectively. In Eq (11), term (where j = i in summation) was assumed as a certain bias arising from the estimation of PPC connectivity, shown below. It can be seen that a part of the system composed only of delta-band phases (Eq (11)) is the Kuramoto model (or also called the Kuramoto-Sakaguchi model) subject to noise [22]. Moreover, the present system (Eqs (10) and (11)) can reduce to the identical Stuart-Landau oscillators when kδ, kαδ, and D are all set to zero [22]. In this model, we made a connection from fluctuation ηi (t) to phase ϕi (t) only because our hypothesis (Fig 1) was that the dynamic changes in PAC strengths (transitions between PAC states) can be attributed to changes in PPC strengths (transitions between synchronous states). Accordingly, we set and in Eq (10) to arbitrary values that could not affect the transition dynamics.
As described below, synchronous states in the model were represented by phase patterns with different relative phase relationships, and were thus characterized by a set of the phase differences [57]. The model (Eqs (10) and (11)) without the fluctuation term Dηi (t) can show multistability where each attractor generates oscillations with a distinct phase pattern, and such oscillations in a state can realize the transition to another state by fluctuations Dηi (t) (see the scenario of multistability in [58]). In the following, the delta-band phase patterns were first estimated from the individual CSD signals Im (t). The delta-band PPC connectivity and the level of fluctuations D were then estimated in turn. Finally, the model Eqs (10) and (11) was numerically simulated with ω = 2πf1, kδ = kαδ = 0.1 and η(t) = (η1(t), η2(t), …,ηN(t)) being generated from a multivariate normal distribution, using the Euler-Maruyama method [59] with time step . Hereafter, we represented the PPC-PAC connectivity by complex-valued matrices Cδ and Cαδ, which were defined as and , respectively.
Estimation of phase patterns.
Phase patterns of the delta-band oscillatory dynamics were estimated from CSD signals Im(t) based on the label L(t) ∈ {1, 2, …, K} of A0(t). First, delta-band phases θ(t) = (θ1(t), θ2(t), …,θN(t)) were extracted from Im (t) using the complex-valued Morlet wavelet Ψ0 (t) defined by Eq (4), as follows: (12) where arg(⋅) denotes the conversion from the complex value to its phase. The parameter σ1 of Ψ0 (t) in Eq (4) was set to a value, such that as well as Ψ0 (t) applied to A1(t). Next, the time courses of the phase differences between each pair of θi (t) and θj (t) were calculated, and were averaged over time with respect to each labeled state μ as follows: (13) where |⋅| denotes the number of time instances at which the dynamics visited state μ. The absolute and argument parts and in Eq (13) indicated the mean of the phase synchronization index [49] and the mean of the phase difference between θi (t) and θj (t) in state μ, respectively. Then, the phase pattern (the relative phases) was estimated from phase differences according to the following algorithm composed of initialization steps (14) (15) (16) (17) and (N − 2)-time iterations of (18) (19) (20) (21) for μ = 1, 2, …, K, where the following index has been defined: (22)
The index Rij was used to measure how reliably the phases θi(t) and θj(t) were phase-locked over time and among states. As a whole, the phase pattern θμ was regarded as the synchronous state μ in the model.
Estimation of PPC connectivity.
The PPC connectivity Cδ was estimated from synchronous states {θμ} as follows [57]: (23) where (24) and P† denotes the Moore-Penrose inverse of P. The obtained connectivity Cδ can converge a trajectory of the system Eq (11) into either of synchronous states {θμ} such that are preserved [57].
Estimation of the level of fluctuations.
The fluctuation level D was estimated from system Eq (10) with PPC connectivity Cδ. The fluctuations η(t) were generated from the multivariate normal distribution of mean zeros and the covariance matrix, which was represented by a nearest symmetric positive semidefinite matrix [60] of matrix Σ defined as (25)
The value Σij measures the similarity of among synchronous states {θμ}; as differs, Σij approaches zero, and so the fluctuations ηi (t) and ηj (t) become independent of each other. That is, we assumed that the delta-band phase difference (θi (t) − θj (t)) was likely to fluctuate as it showed large changes among phase patterns {θμ}. The delta-band phase dynamics ϕi (t) for i = 1, 2, …,N were then simulated with an increase of D from 0 to 1 and a step size of 0.02, and the simulated phases were labeled as by referring to the overlap Mμ (t) [57], as follows: (26) (27)
From transition , the following 3K statistics were extracted: the maximum , median , and minimum of the dwell time for μ = 1, 2, …,K with respect to each D, and a level was estimated such that the root-mean-square error (RMSE) of was minimized as follows: (28) (29) where denotes the actual statistic extracted from L (t). When estimating the fluctuation level here, we set Δt = 0.2 s for the sake of computational efficiency.
Validation of the parameter estimation.
Then, the aforementioned estimation of phase patterns {θμ}, PPC connectivity Cδ, and the level of fluctuations D were validated by artificially generated phase dynamics. First, as in the previous studies [61, 62], we constructed P correlated patterns from a single reference pattern. From a phase pattern where each phase followed the uniform distribution between −π and π, we computed new pattern as follows: (30) for μ = 1, 2, …,P. The variable followed a normal distribution of mean 0 and standard deviation 1, and thus as σ approaches zero, phase patterns show a high correlation. The corresponding PPC connectivity was computed using Eqs (23) and (24), and the model (Eqs (10) and (11)) combined with connectivity and fluctuations η (t) was simulated. The parameter estimation was then validated in the condition of σ = 0.5 and P = 3.
Validation of the dynamic PPC-PAC hypothesis.
Finally, the dynamic PPC-PAC hypothesis (Fig 1) was validated by individual models (Eqs (10) and (11)) with PPC connectivity Cδ and fluctuation level , as estimated above. The delta-alpha PAC dynamics (ϕi (t), ri (t)) for i = 1, 2, …,N were simulated across the subjects, and the N simulated CSD amplitudes (r1(t), r2(t), …, rN(t)) were mapped to the N simulated EEG amplitudes through observation h in Eq (9) as follows: (31) where T denotes the transposition. The simulated observations were converted to their projection in a space with the same dimension as Y (t). Specifically, (i) the instantaneous amplitudes were computed from around delta-band peak frequency f1, (ii) were labeled as K states of , and (iii) the labeled amplitudes were projected to by LDA. Finally, FT surrogate data testing was performed in the same manner as for the experimental data.
Results
We started with the condition d = 2, and many of the recorded brain dynamics, consisting of 63-channel scalp EEG signals X(t), were labeled as two-dimensional metastable states with peak frequencies f1 and f2 (n = 101). Notably, these states were characterized by the delta- and alpha-band peak frequencies ranging from 0.1 to 4 Hz and 8 to 12 Hz, respectively (n = 95; Fig 3). The frequency of the fast oscillations (f2) was first estimated from the power spectrum of X(t) (Fig 3A and 3E; S2 Fig), and was used to calculate the corresponding instantaneous amplitudes A1(t) (Fig 3B). These amplitudes were converted further into corresponding instantaneous amplitudes A0(t) (Fig 3C) around the frequency of the slow oscillations (f1), which was estimated from the power spectrum of A1(t) (Fig 3F). Then, k-means clustering with the Calinski-Harabasz criterion [52] was applied to signals A0(t), and they were labeled as K states of L(t) that reflected different strengths of amplitude modulation (Fig 3D). The resulting labeled signals (A0(t), L(t)) in Fig 3C showed significant correlations with the time courses of the modulation index [13], with the significance level of the two-sided tests being corrected for multiple comparisons using the false-discovery rate (FDR) method [63] (FDR p < 0.05, in the scalp sites, accounting for more than 50 electrodes; see S3 Fig), and were thus characterized by different PAC strengths.
(A) A representative raw EEG signal at the FC2 electrode. (B) The corresponding first envelope (instantaneous amplitudes) around an alpha-band peak frequency. (C) The second envelope around a delta-band peak frequency. (D) The alpha-band signals. (E) The mean power spectrum of the raw EEG signals as in panel A. (F) The mean power spectrum of the first envelopes as in panel B. The alpha-band and delta-band peak frequencies were estimated from the peaks of mean power spectra in panels E and F, respectively (see the dotted lines in panels E and F and refer to S3 Fig). In panel D, (i) indicates the data corresponding to panel A, while (ii) indicates another signal of faster transition among more states obtained from an individual with a lower AQ score (the signal at electrode POz). The colors in panels A to D indicate distinct states.
To demonstrate these PAC states (two-dimensional states with PAC from f1 to f2, labeled as L(t)) as possible metastable states in the resting human brain, we projected the obtained labeled signals (A0(t), L(t)) to trajectory Y(t) in a lower-dimensional state space (Fig 4). The LDA was used to yield a space such that the projected trajectory can evolve into nearby points within each labeled state; this property is also consistent with the fixed point that can converge a trajectory into one point. Specifically, the labeled signals were projected onto a plane in the cases where the number of states was more than two (Fig 4A and 4F), and were converted into a corresponding bivariate histogram (Fig 4B and 4G); otherwise, the histogram would be a one-dimensional axis because of limitations of the LDA in this study. We calculated the maxima of the counts of bins with respect to each state, and regarded these statistics as the indices for the attracting tendencies of states. We tested whether the representative of the obtained statistics (E; the minimum in this study) was statistically significant, using the FT surrogate for multivariate time-series data [54] under the null hypothesis H0 where the labeled signals are linearly correlated Gaussian noise (see Materials and methods). The surrogate data testing rejected H0 for many individual datasets under the condition of d = 2 (FT test, one-sided p < 0.05, n = 101; Fig 4C and 4H) so that the labeled dynamics (Fig 4A and 4F; Fig 3C) were seen as a trajectory among the zero-dimensional weakly attracting states; in other words, the states of the original transition dynamics (Fig 3A) were identified as the two-dimensional metastable states. None of these datasets were rejected under condition d = 1, and many were not rejected for d = 0 (FT test, one-sided p > 0.05, n = 162 for d = 1 and p > 0.05, n = 99 for d = 0; see S4 Fig). The majority of the other datasets were rejected for d = 3 (FT test, one-sided p < 0.05, n = 53). As a whole, the surrogate data testing provided experimental evidence that macroscopic brain dynamics of the resting-state large-scale network can make spontaneous transitions across two- or three-dimensional metastable states. In particular, the metastable PAC states identified here were characterized by two peak frequencies in the delta and alpha bands (n = 95). We represented each of these delta-alpha PAC states by a vector composed of mean values of the labeled signals (i.e. the delta-band instantaneous amplitudes depicted in Fig 3C) over time, namely, by a 63-dimensional vector of mean PAC strengths (Fig 4D and 4I; S3 Fig).
(A to E) Representative delta-alpha PAC dynamics for an individual with higher attention-related AQ subscores (refer to Fig 3A to 3D(i)). (F to J) Representative dynamics for an individual with lower scores (refer to Fig 3D(ii)). (A, F) The trajectory of labeled signals in a plane. (B, G) The corresponding bivariate histograms. (C, H) Surrogate data testing under a condition of d = 2. (D, I) The resulting delta-alpha PAC states (represented by the mean PAC strengths). (E, J) Transitions between the identified PAC states. Surrogate data testing was applied to the density of points indicated by the red circles in panels B and G and the red lines in panels C and H, and the null hypothesis H0 in condition d = 2 was rejected (C and H). The delta-alpha PAC dynamics tended to stay in a state for a longer time and to visit a lower number of states in individuals with higher AQ subscores for attention to detail and attention switching (compare E with J). The colors in panels A, E, F, and J indicate distinct states, as depicted in D and I.
Delta-alpha PAC states (Fig 4D and 4I) were categorized into four groups across individuals (n = 95; Fig 5). First, we converted these states into modified Z-scores [64] to standardize them robustly among individuals, with each dataset being subtracted by the median and divided by the median absolute deviation instead of the mean and the SD, respectively, and all the data were subsequently multiplied by 0.6745 [64]. The obtained Z-scores were concatenated across states and individuals, and the resulting dataset was regarded as the data in a 63-dimensional feature space. In this space, we conducted principal component analysis (PCA) and applied a permutation test to 63 PCs by shuffling the dataset 200 times across the channel with respect to each component. The first four PCs significantly explained variance (one-sided, Bonferroni-corrected p < 1.58 × 10−4, total explained variance 81.6%; Fig 5A). Eigenvectors of these four PCs were then mapped as the topographies and categorized according to the regional distribution of the amplitude modulation in the occipital lobe, parietal lobe, and lateral and bilateral distributions in the occipital lobe (Fig 5B).
(A) PCs of across-individual states. (B) Eigenvectors of the first four PCs. The variance explained by the first four PCs was significant, and accounted for 81.6% of total variance. The dataset used here was a set of the modified Z-scores of mean PAC strengths that were concatenated across states and individuals.
The dynamics of transitions between the delta-alpha PAC states (Fig 4E and 4J), as identified in this study, showed correlations with the two AQ subscores of ‘attention to detail’ and ‘attention switching’ (n = 52; Fig 6). From the transition dynamics, we calculated the intervals between transitions (for which uncertain intervals at both edges were excluded) and obtained the following candidate statistics: the maximum, median, and minimum of the dwell time. These statistics, in addition to the number of states and the alpha- and delta-band peak frequencies estimated above, were regarded as test statistics (x) and were paired with the following five AQ subscores (y): social skills, attention to detail, attention switching, communication, and imagination. For these 30 pairwise statistics, we used multiple comparison tests with Pearson’s correlation coefficients. The maximal dwell time showed a significant positive correlation with the attention-to-detail score (r = 0.456, two-sided, Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.0013; Fig 6A, the effects of remaining variables in x on y were partially adjusted). Next, we conducted a post-hoc test of the multiple correlation coefficient using a linear regression model in which the attention-switching score was regarded as a dependent variable and was regressed against two statistics: the number of states and the alpha-band peak frequency (Fig 6B), with these being selected because of weak significant correlations with the attention-switching score (r = −0.283, two-sided, uncorrected p < 0.06 for the number of states; and r = 0.321, two-sided, uncorrected p < 0.03 for the alpha-band peak frequency; Fig 6C and 6D, the effects of the remaining variables in x on y were partially adjusted). The resulting linear combination showed significant correlation with the attention-switching score (F (2,49) = 4.91, r = 0.409, p < 0.02), and factor loadings of this linear sum on the number of states and the alpha-band peak frequency (i.e. the correlation coefficients) were −0.614 and 0.666, respectively (Fig 6B). The results indicated that in individuals with the ability to maintain a stronger focus on attention to detail and less attention switching, the delta-alpha PAC dynamics tended to stay in a particular state for a longer time, to visit a lower number of states, and to oscillate at a higher alpha-band peak frequency, thereby providing evidence on how autistic-like traits may be associated with the metastable human brain.
(A) Scatter plot of the attention-to-detail score against maximal dwell time. (B) Scatter plot of the attention-switching score against the linear sum of the number of states and the alpha-band peak frequency (i) with corresponding factor loadings (ii). (C, D) Scatter plots of the attention-switching score against the number of states and the alpha-band peak frequency, respectively. In each panel, the circles in magenta and green correspond to the representative individual delta-alpha PAC dynamics, as depicted in Fig 4A to 4E and 4F to 4J, respectively. The dotted line in each panel indicates the fitted regression line.
We modeled the metastable delta-alpha PAC dynamics (n = 95) to validate the dynamic PPC-PAC hypothesis (Materials and methods; Fig 1). The model consisted of delta-alpha PAC oscillators {ϕi(t), ri(t)}, PPC-PAC connectivity (Cδ, Cαδ), and fluctuations Dη(t). More specifically, we made connections among the delta-band phases (Cδ: PPC connectivity), from delta-band phases to alpha-band amplitudes (Cαδ: PAC connectivity) and from fluctuations to delta-band phases (D: fluctuation level), such that synchronization, amplitude modulation, and state transition could occur via the PPC and PAC. The PPC connectivity (Cδ) and the level of fluctuations (D) were estimated from the data for each individual (Fig 7); this parameter estimation was validated by the artificially generated phase dynamics (S5 Fig). On the other hand, the PAC connectivity (Cαδ) was set to arbitrary values, because our hypothesis was that state transition occurs according to dynamic changes in PPC strengths (Fig 1). Note that a part of the present model was composed of only delta-band phases (Eq (11)), with the PPC being equivalent to the Kuramoto model subjected to noise [23]. In this study, the metastable PAC dynamics were modeled as the fluctuation-induced transitions between multistable attractors (for the scenario of multistability, see [58]).
(A) Mean phase differences between every pair of delta-band CSD phases with respect to each delta-alpha PAC state μ. (B) The corresponding phase patterns {θμ} (regarded as the synchronous states in the model). (C) The estimated PPC connectivity Cδ as a complex-valued matrix with absolute part (i) and argument part (ii). (D) The estimated fluctuation level . The synchronous states (B) combined with the Kuramoto model resulted in PPC connectivity (C), and the Kuramoto model with PPC connectivity was used for estimation of the fluctuation level (D). The data used in this Figure correspond to Figs 3A to 3D(i) and 4A to 4E.
First, we computed the CSD [42, 55] from raw EEG signals to reduce the volume-conduction effect on the estimation of instantaneous phases, and then estimated the phase patterns {θμ} from the 63-channel CSD signals Im(I) (Fig 7A and 7B). Specifically, we extracted the instantaneous phases θ(t) from Im(I) around the delta-band peak frequency f1, and labeled θ(t) as transition L(t) (refer to Fig 4E and 4J). We then computed the phase differences from labeled phases (θ(t), L(t)) with respect to each state μ (Fig 7A), and estimated the phase patterns {θμ}, which were regarded as the synchronous states in the model.
Next, we estimated the PPC connectivity Cδ and the level of fluctuations D (Fig 7C and 7D). Synchronous states {θμ} obtained above were applied to the Kuramoto model (Eq (11)) composed of delta-band phases {ϕi (t)}, and they were converted into PPC connectivity Cδ (Fig 7C) [57]. We gradually increased the level (D) of fluctuations to phases, simulated the corresponding models, and generated the transitions for each level. The resulting set of transitions was quantified by the maximum, median, and minimum of the dwell time with respect to each fluctuation level, and from these statistics and those obtained from the data, we calculated the RMSE. We repeated this calculation 100 times and chose the fluctuation level minimizing the RMSE (Fig 7D).
Then, we simulated the individual delta-alpha PAC dynamics (n = 95) as modeled above (Fig 8). By calculating the overlaps Mμ(t) (Eq (27)) every time step and with respect to each state μ (Fig 8A and 8E), we observed from the model that the phase differences {ϕi(t) − ϕj(t)} changed dynamically among synchronous states {θμ}, and that the alpha-band amplitudes {ri(t)} were oscillatory at the delta-band frequency f1. These oscillatory amplitudes were applied to observation h in Eq (31), so that the simulated EEG amplitudes were obtained. We then computed corresponding instantaneous amplitudes around f1, labeled as transition by referring to the overlaps (Eqs (26) and (27)), and projected the labeled signals to trajectory in a lower-dimensional space (Fig 8B and 8F). This space was converted into a corresponding histogram (Fig 8C and 8G), which we used to conduct surrogate data testing in the same manner as for the experimental data (A0(t),L(t)). For simulated delta-alpha PAC dynamics, the surrogate data testing rejected H0 for a greater number of individual models in d = 2 than in d = 1 (FT test, one-sided p < 0.05, n = 74 out of 95 for d = 2 and p < 0.05, n = 45 out of 95 for d = 1; Fig 8D and 8H, S6 Fig). A hypothesis test for the difference in two population proportions indicated that the proportion of the rejected individual models was significantly higher in d = 2 than in d = 1 (z = 3.418, p < 0.001). Overall, these simulation results (Fig 8) were consistent with the empirical counterpart (Fig 4), providing evidence for the dynamic PPC-PAC hypothesis.
(A to D) The representative simulated delta-alpha PAC dynamics for an individual with higher attention-related AQ subscores (refer to Fig 4A to 4E). (E to H) Representative dynamics for an individual with lower scores (refer to Fig 4F to 4J). (A, E) Time courses of overlaps (i) and the corresponding labels (ii) among delta-alpha PAC states. (B, F) The trajectory of labeled signals in a plane. (C, G) The corresponding bivariate histograms. (D, H) Surrogate data testing under condition d = 2. Surrogate data testing was applied to the density of points indicated by the red circles in panels C and G and the red lines in panels D and H, and the null hypothesis H0 in condition d = 2 was rejected (D and H). The model showed consistent results with the data analysis, evidence of the dynamic PPC-PAC hypothesis.
Finally, we attempted to predict the delta-alpha PAC dynamics with a temporally decreasing fluctuation level D(t) (Fig 9). By calculating the overlaps every time step in this simulation, we observed that one of the delta-alpha PAC states was stabilized, so that the transition dynamics qualitatively changed into the dynamics in a single state (Fig 9A) as the fluctuation level decreased (Fig 9B). This appearance depended on the initial condition of the system. Moreover, such a qualitative change from multiple states to one state was viewed as a shrinking of the trajectory in the state space (Fig 9C). We generated the trajectories of the system under different initial conditions in a space composed of the overlaps. The trajectories were projected onto planes, from which we observed that the spaces filled by the transition dynamics can include the three states as their subsets (Fig 9C).
(A) Time courses of the overlaps with their labeled sequences under different initial conditions in cases where the dynamics can converge into one of three states. (B) The time course of the fluctuation level. (C) The trajectories of overlaps in the phase space with their projections. The contour plots on projections in panel C indicate that the spaces filled by transition dynamics (black lines) can include the three states (red, green, and blue lines) as their subsets. The data used in this Figure correspond to the individual with higher attention-related AQ subscores depicted in Figs 3A to 3D(i), 4A to 4E, 7 and 8A to 8D.
Discussion
In this study, we developed a data-driven approach to label observed metastable dynamics as the underlying d-dimensional states. The method was applied to 63-channel scalp EEG signals recorded from 130 healthy humans in an eyes-closed resting condition (n = 162 in total). The observed signals were labeled as metastable states with a dimension larger than one, such that PAC could occur hierarchically, in particular with a dimension of two, corresponding with the delta- and alpha-band peak frequencies (n = 95; Fig 3). Then, the dynamics of the transitions between the delta-alpha PAC states (Fig 4), which were categorized into four groups across individuals (Fig 5), showed correlations with the AQ subscales of attention to detail and attention switching (Fig 6). Finally, we qualitatively reproduced the obtained results in a coupled oscillator system driven by spontaneous fluctuations (Figs 7 and 8) with prediction (Fig 9), to validate the hypothesis that the dynamic changes in PAC strengths can be attributed to changes in the strengths of PPC, that is, to dynamic functional connectivity in an electrophysiological sense (Fig 1).
Many studies show that neural activity exhibits oscillations whose amplitudes change rhythmically over time [6, 12, 13, 65, 66]. A possible mechanism for this amplitude modulation is PAC, in which the phases of slow oscillations interact with the amplitudes of faster oscillations such that local and global computations in the large-scale network can cooperate [12, 13]; the PAC takes various forms depending on events such as visual and auditory tasks [65, 66]. In the present work, we identified a possible link of the PAC for resting-state EEG dynamics to the two-dimensional metastable states, which were also characterized by slow and fast timescales (Figs 1 to 4). Some modeling studies have shown evidence for a torus-related PAC [18, 19], such as the study of Sase et al., which analyzed a model composed of excitatory and inhibitory networks with dynamic synapses and revealed that amplitude-modulated dynamics can emerge from a trajectory into the torus or the closed curve, with these being mediated by bifurcation [18]. Hence, it is suggested that attractors in the resting brain play a functional role in generating cooperative dynamics over the large-scale network and could be a torus, in which spontaneous events are effectively processed by the utilization of multiple neural timescales.
A two- or three-dimensional state was identified as a possible metastable state underlying the resting-state EEG signals of most individuals (refer to Figs 1 to 4). This result implies that macroscopic dynamics in the human brain can follow the oscillatory hierarchy hypothesis stating that slower and faster oscillations interact hierarchically via the PAC [35, 67]. Lakatos et al. showed experimental evidence of EEG hierarchical organization: delta-band phases modulated amplitudes of fast oscillations, which further made a spontaneous PAC connection to another faster oscillatory component [35]. We suggest that the resting human brain could utilize attractors with multiple timescales, so that a variety of events are spontaneously organized in a hierarchy of macroscopic neural oscillations.
Not only were the amplitudes of resting-state EEG signals rhythmic, but the strengths of the PAC (as obtained after two-time computations of instantaneous amplitudes) exhibited dynamic changes such that transitions between two-dimensional states could occur (Fig 4). Previous studies showed that the PAC strength changed dynamically over time, and transiently in response to sensory and cognitive events [12, 68–71]. Such dynamic coupling was observed during cognitive behavior in a T-maze task [68], learning [69], attentional allocation [70], and motor preparation [71]. Using a spatial-cuing task, Szczepanski et al. found PAC modulation-dependent attentional behavior in which the modulation strength was negatively correlated with the reaction time on a trial-by-trial basis [70]. Moreover, Kajihara et al. showed evidence that delta-alpha PAC dynamically occurs to mediate the global-to-local computation in motor preparation, such that the delta-band synchrony makes a direct link with the alpha-band amplitudes via the PAC [71]. These results may be supported by the conventional view of the task-dependent PAC [65, 66]: Voytek et al. reported that fast oscillations were strongly coupled with a slow oscillatory component via PAC during a visual task, and that this coupling weakened during an auditory task so that PAC with another slow oscillatory component could occur [66]. In recent years, it has been suggested that dynamic PAC plays a role in modulating the dynamics of the large-scale network, doing so more effectively than coupling with static modulation [12].
To the best of our knowledge, our finding of dynamic PAC, as realized by the transition between the metastable states, is the first experimental report of this phenomenon. Crucially, we identified the transitions between delta-alpha PAC states (Fig 4), which were further categorized into four groups across individuals (n = 95; Fig 5). Previous studies showed evidence from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signals that large-scale subnetworks with different functional connectivity, termed ‘resting-state networks’, are consistent across individuals [72, 73], and that these consist of the following components: the default model network, the executive control network, the salience network, the dorsal attention network, and networks related to auditory, sensorimotor, and visual functions [73]. In recent years, it has been suggested that such networks are linked to the underlying electrophysiological oscillations [74, 75]. With respect to each network, Mantini et al. showed correlations between slow fluctuations in the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal and EEG power variations of different brain rhythms, including delta and alpha rhythms [74]. Moreover, Britz et al. identified four resting-state networks from BOLD signals combined with the transition dynamics of EEG scalp potentials [75], referred to as EEG microstates [24–27], and a previous study likewise showed four network modules that were highly consistent across subjects [72]. These results inspired attempts to detect the large-scale functional network using only EEG data [76]. Moreover, the regional specificity of PAC has also been reported [66, 70], as well as the lateralization of PAC strengths [70]. Thus, macroscopic neural oscillations with multiple timescales in the resting human brain, identified as the delta-alpha PAC states in this study, could be the electrophysiological signatures of resting-state networks.
Our main finding is the AQ-related behavioral correlates of delta-alpha PAC dynamics, namely, the correlation with the two AQ subscales of attention to detail and attention switching (Fig 6). In fact, slower neural oscillations are suggested to be dynamically entrained by rhythmic input from external sensory events [12, 14, 77]. Lakatos et al. showed that delta-band oscillations selectively entrained to the rhythm of attended visual and auditory stimuli, thereby providing evidence of the neural entrainment to attention by which the brain encodes task-relevant events into preferred delta-band phases [14]. On the other hand, alpha-band oscillations have been suggested to play an inhibitory role by effectively gating top-down processing [78]. Previous studies showed that the alpha-band power decreased in the hemisphere contralateral to attended visual stimuli, whereas it exhibited an increase in the ipsilateral hemisphere (refer to Fig 5) [78]; this is evidence for attention-induced alpha-band lateralization that gates the flow of top-down information into task-irrelevant regions [78, 79]. Alpha-band activity are dominantly observed in the resting brain, in particular in the occipital region [7], and the alpha-band peak frequency depends on age and cognitive performance [7], which shows inter-individual variability [80]. Moreover, a recent study reported atypical neural timescales for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) [81], on the basis of the fact that the heterogeneity of timescales in the brain could be a basis for functional hierarchy [82]. Watanabe et al. found shorter neural timescales in sensory/visual regions and a longer timescale in the right caudate for individuals with a higher severity level of ASD [81]. Together, it is suggested that attractors in the resting human brain generate individual delta-alpha PAC dynamics that selectively encode spontaneous events by utilizing attention. Individual macroscopic dynamics in the brain, as identified here, and which tend to stay in a state for a longer time, to visit a lower number of states, and to oscillate at a higher alpha-band frequency in individuals with a stronger preference for specific events (Fig 6), might be a neural signature of the autism spectrum, covering both typical and atypical development.
Although we filtered out lower frequency components below 0.1 Hz offline, the delta-band oscillations (0.1–4 Hz) reported here may still be affected by infra-slow fluctuations (0.01–0.1 Hz) during rest. Such spontaneous fluctuations have been observed by various neuroimaging methods such as EEG and fMRI [83, 84], and a previous study reported that spontaneous infra-slow scalp potential fluctuations are correlated with BOLD fluctuations of resting-state networks [85]. In this study, the lower bound of the delta-band frequency was set to the lower bound of the spectral frequency of the first envelopes, i.e., 0.1 Hz. Dependence of the results on this parameter should be investigated in future work.
Recently, atypical transition dynamics of the resting large-scale network were identified as ASD symptoms [86]. By applying energy-landscape analysis [87] to the fMRI signals of resting-state networks, Watanabe and Rees showed that neurotypical brain activity transited between two major states via an intermediate state, and that the number of these transitions was lower due to the unstabilization of the intermediate state for the individuals with a higher severity level of ASD [86]. Such dynamics-behavior associations were linked to functional segregation. In this study, we generated the energy-like landscape of resting-state EEG dynamics by utilizing multi-step envelope analysis (Fig 2), so that the underlying oscillatory attractors could transform into the fixed points (Fig 4), and found a similar dynamics-behavior association between the dwell time of delta-alpha PAC state transitions and the attention-to-detail AQ subscale (Fig 6A). Hence, the individual delta-alpha PAC dynamics could be the electrophysiological signature of an atypical balance in functional organization.
What kind of mechanisms can underlie the dynamic PAC and enable transitions between attractors? One possible mechanism is the metastability (or called criticality in a similar sense) that is suggested to play a role in maintaining a dynamic balance of integration and segregation of brain functions across multiple spatiotemporal scales [4, 34, 88]. Such dynamic organization was fruitfully discussed from viewpoints of both models and experimental data by Tognoli and Kelso [34]. By introducing an extended Haken-Kelso-Bunz model [88] and actual neurophysiological and behavioral data [34], they illustrated that phase dynamics in the brain can utilize both tendencies of dwells to be in synchrony and escapes into non-synchronous patterns, and associated this fact with the abilities of the brain (integration and segregation) in the theory of coordination dynamics [34, 88]. Similar dynamics were previously observed in the resting-state neural signals of EEG [26, 28, 29], fMRI [89], and functional multineuron calcium imaging [90] aimed at generating a better mathematical model of individual brains [1–5, 18, 20, 21, 23, 84, 91]; there is ongoing debate whether spontaneous neural activity originates from a deterministic dynamical system [88] that may yield chaotic itinerancy [92], or our present standpoint, a random dynamical system driven by spontaneous stochastic fluctuations [93–95] (see [58] for possible scenarios). Together, it is suggested that individual delta-alpha PAC dynamics at rest (which could relate to previous studies reporting that delta-alpha PAC occurred in preparation for a task [71] and during decision making [65]) utilize metastability to organize spontaneous events in a hierarchy of macroscopic oscillations with multiple timescales.
Here, on the basis of our dynamic PPC-PAC hypothesis validated by the empirical and modeling counterparts (Fig 1; Figs 4 and 8), we posit that the dynamic changes in delta-alpha PAC modulation are attributed to the dynamic functional connectivity in an electrophysiological sense. Dynamic functional connectivity is referred to as the functional connectivity of the large-scale network with dynamically changing temporal correlation [96], and has been regularly observed in resting-state fMRI signals with behavioral and cognitive relevance [89, 97]. In a similar sense, resting-state EEG experiments showed that the dynamics of the large-scale network transited among a repertoire of synchronized states [8, 28, 29]. We applied this view to the large-scale network of slow oscillations, taking into account its neuromodulatory influences on a faster oscillatory component, and validated the resulting dynamic PPC-PAC hypothesis using an extended version of the Kuramoto model (see Figs 1, 7 and 8). By analyzing a model of local networks with heterogeneity near the onset of synchrony, a relevant modeling study demonstrated that transient synchrony of the large-scale network can organize the routing of information flow [98]. In the present study, we detected the synchronous states by referring to the transitions of delta-alpha PAC dynamics (Fig 4E and 4J) to support the dynamic PPC-PAC hypothesis. However, the changes in PPC connectivity would be better characterized by drifts of the delta frequency that might occur from transitions. Dynamic and transient delta-alpha PAC, as identified in this study, may originate from the coupling between delta-band phases, and the relationship of this transient PAC with transient synchrony remains to be elucidated.
We should remark on the observation operator h in Eqs (9) and (31) that connected the simulated CSD dynamics to the experimental EEG data. The method (Fig 2) was developed such that the estimation of inter-regional properties between signals was not necessarily required, and accordingly it was directly applied to the scalp EEG signals. While it might seem natural to apply the CSD to the empirical counterpart as well, we wanted to avoid generating possible artifacts due to the CSD estimation [56]. However, amplitude modulation of apparent frequencies could affect the results when multiple uncoupled sources coexist in the brain. Limitations of the metastable states clustering developed here should be clarified in future work.
Finally, we observed shrinking of the transient PAC dynamics with a temporally decreasing fluctuation level from the model (Fig 9). This result could relate to the reduction in trial-to-trial variability of cortical activity that can occur after the stimulus onset, such that the spontaneous and task-evoked brain activity interplay in a complex manner [99]. Such a phenomenon was previously observed from the spikes of single neurons [100], and was recently demonstrated by a model including local and global cortical networks at multiple spatiotemporal scales [101]. Thus, the present model combined with the resting-state EEG data could have the potential for predicting task-relevant events; for example, identifying a parameter that can facilitate a dynamic balance in the typical and atypical neural activity of the large-scale network, which might be helpful for mitigating the severity level of ASD, so that faster transition dynamics among more states can appear during rest.
Taken together, we reported the first experimental evidence that (i) metastable states in the resting human brain can be two- or three-dimensional; (ii) that their dynamics can be metastable delta-alpha PAC dynamics; and (iii) their functional role is associated with autistic-like traits. These empirical findings were then combined with the modeling counterpart, to provide evidence that (iv) such dynamic and functional PAC may originate from dynamic functional connectivity. We suggest that the metastable human brain organizes spontaneous events dynamically and selectively in a hierarchy of macroscopic oscillations that interact in a cooperative manner, and that such dynamic organization might encode a spectrum of individual traits covering both typical and atypical development. Our findings on the metastable human brain and its association with autistic-like traits may be further corroborated by the following research: (i) the brain of ASD subjects during rest [86, 102, 103] to verify our present findings from healthy subjects; (ii) the brain during transcranial magnetic stimulation [32, 104] and closed-loop control by neurofeedback [79] to manipulate individual traits; and (iii) the brain during a task to understand the relationship between spontaneous and task-evoked dynamics from the viewpoint of the attractors that might underlie the human brain [99].
Supporting information
S1 Fig. The model of a coupled oscillator system of delta-alpha PAC driven by fluctuations.
The model comprised N PAC oscillators whose phases {ϕi(t)} and amplitudes {ri(t)} corresponded to delta- and alpha-band activity, respectively. The phase ϕj(t) interacted with ϕi(t) and ri(t) via the PPC connectivity and the PAC connectivity . The phase ϕi(t) was driven by fluctuation ηi(t) with the level D for i = 1, 2, …, N.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008929.s001
(TIF)
S2 Fig. Estimation of the peak frequency of a fast oscillatory component.
The power spectra of EEG signals were detrended in the double-logarithmic scale with respect to each signal. The detrended spectra were averaged, resulting in a single spectrum from which we estimated the peak frequency (refer to Fig 3E).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008929.s002
(TIF)
S3 Fig. Correlations between the labeled signals and the time courses of the modulation index (MI) [13].
The MI of the EEG signals was estimated successively over time by a sliding time window with a length of the inverse of the delta-band peak frequency (i.e., one delta wave period). Significant correlations were shown from the scalp sites of more than 50 electrodes.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008929.s003
(TIF)
S4 Fig. Trajectories of the experimental delta-alpha PAC dynamics in the d = 0 and d = 1 conditions.
The surrogate data testing did not reject the null hypothesis H0 in condition d = 1 for all the experimental delta-alpha PAC dynamics identified in this study, and many of them were not rejected in the condition of d = 0. This Figure corresponds to Fig 4A to 4E, and depicts the case of K = 3 estimated from the condition d = 2 for comparison purposes.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008929.s004
(TIF)
S5 Fig. Validation of the model’s parameter estimation.
Artificially generated phase patterns and the estimated phase patterns {θμ} showed high similarities 0.967, 0.881, and 0.962, which were evaluated by for μ = 1, 2, 3, respectively. Accordingly, simulated PPC connectivity and its estimation Cδ showed high cosine similarity (0.979 between the absolute parts and 0.636 between the argument parts). The estimated fluctuation level was 0.44, which was close to the true value of D = 0.5.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008929.s005
(TIF)
S6 Fig. Trajectories of the modeled delta-alpha PAC dynamics in the condition d = 1.
The surrogate data testing did not reject the null hypothesis H0 in condition d = 1 for all the modeled delta-alpha PAC dynamics. This Figure corresponds to Fig 8A to 8D, and depicts the case of K = 3 for comparison purposes.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008929.s006
(TIF)
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Ms. Yoko Noguchi for help with acquisition of EEG signals and AQ scores, and to Dr. Yuka O. Okazaki for helpful discussion. TS would like to thank International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) for the support.
References
- 1. Deco G, Jirsa VK, Mclntosh AR. Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12:43–56.
- 2. Cabral J, Kringelbach ML, Deco G. Exploring the network dynamics underlying brain activity during rest. Prog Neurobiol. 2014;114(1):102–131.
- 3. Breakspear M. Dynamic models of large-scale brain activity. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20(3):340–352.
- 4. Cocchi L, Gollo LL, Zalesky A, Breakspear M. Criticality in the brain: a synthesis of neurobiology, models and cognition. Progr Neurobiol. 2017;158:132–152.
- 5. Cabral J, Kringelbach ML, Deco G. Functional connectivity dynamically evolves on multiple time-scales over a static structural connectome: models and mechanisms. NeuroImage. 2017;160:84–96.
- 6. Buzsáki G, Draguhn A. Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. Science. 2004;304(5679):1926–1929.
- 7. Klimesch W. EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. Brain Res Rev. 1999;29(2-3):169–195.
- 8. Varela F, Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J. The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2:229–239.
- 9. Doesburg SM, Roggeveen AB, Kitajo K, Ward LM. Large-scale gamma-band phase synchronization and selective attention. Cereb Cortex. 2008;18(2):386–396.
- 10. Hipp JF, Engel AK, Siegel M. Oscillatory synchronization in large-scale cortical networks predicts perception. Neuron. 2011;69(2):387–396.
- 11. Jensen O, Colgin LL. Cross-frequency coupling between neuronal oscillations. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007;11(7):267–269.
- 12. Canolty RT, Knight RT. The functional role of cross-frequency coupling. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010;14(11):506–515.
- 13. Canolty RT, Edwards E, Dalal SS, Soltani M, Nagarajan SS, Kirsch HE, et al. High gamma power is phase-locked to theta oscillations in human neocortex. Science. 2006;313(5793):1626–1628. pmid:16973878
- 14. Lakatos P, Karmos G, Mehta AD, Ulbert I, Schroeder CE. Entrainment of neuronal oscillations as a mechanism of attentional selection. Science. 2008;320(5872):110–113.
- 15. Aru J, Aru J, Priesemann V, Wibral M, Lana L, Pipa G, et al. Untangling cross-frequency coupling in neuroscience. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2015;31:51–61. pmid:25212583
- 16. Canolty RT, Cadieu CF, Koepsell K, Knight RT, Carmena JM. Multivariate phase-amplitude cross-frequency coupling in neurophysiological signal. NeuroImage. 2012;59(1):8–11.
- 17. Voytek B, D’Esposito M, Crone N, Knight RT. A method for event-related phase/amplitude coupling. NeuroImage. 2013;64:416–424.
- 18. Sase T, Katori Y, Komuro M, Aihara K. Bifurcation analysis on phase-amplitude cross-frequency coupling in neural networks with dynamic synapses. Front Comput Neurosci. 2017;11(18):1–19.
- 19. Velarde OM, Urdapilleta E, Mato G, Dellavale D. Bifurcation structure determines different phase-amplitude coupling patterns in the activity of biologically plausible neural networks. NeuroImage. 2019;202(15):1–20.
- 20. Ibáñez-Molina AJ, Iglesias-Parro S. Neurocomputational model of EEG complexity during mind wandering. Front Comput Neurosci. 2016;10(20):1–10.
- 21. Finger H, Bönstrup M, Cheng B, Messé A, Hilgetag C, Thomalla G, et al. Modeling of large-scale functional brain networks based on structural connectivity from DTI: comparison with EEG derived phase coupling networks and evaluation of alternative methods along the modeling path. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016;12(8):e1005025. pmid:27504629
- 22.
Kuramoto Y. Chemical oscillations, waves, and turbulence. New York: Springer; 1984.
- 23. Breakspear M, Heitmann S, Daffertshofer A. Generative models of cortical oscillations: neurobiological implications of the Kuramoto model. Front Hum Neurosci. 2010;11(190):1–14.
- 24. Lehmann D, Ozaki H, Pal I. EEG alpha map series: brain micro-states by space-oriented adaptive segmentation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1987;67(3):271–288.
- 25. Britz J, Landis T, Michel CM. Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation of bistable stimuli. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19(1):55–65.
- 26. Ville DVD, Britz J, Michel CM. EEG microstate sequences in healthy humans at rest reveal scale-free dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(42):18179–18184.
- 27. Schlegel F, Lehmann D, Faber PL, Milz P, Gianotti LRR. EEG microstates during resting represent personality differences. Brain Topogr. 2012;25(1):20–26.
- 28. Ito J, Nikolaev AR, van Leeuwen C. Dynamics of spontaneous transitions between global brain states. Hum Brain Mapp. 2007;28(9):904–913.
- 29. Betzel RF, Erickson MA, Abell M, O’Donnell BF, Hetrick WP, Sporns O. Synchronization dynamics and evidence for a repertoire of network states in resting EEG. Front Comput Neurosci. 2012;6(74):1–13.
- 30. Kawano T, Hattori N, Uno Y, Kitajo K, Hatakenaka M, Yagura H, et al. Large-scale phase synchrony reflects clinical status after stroke: an EEG Study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31(6):561–570. pmid:28506148
- 31. Noda Y, Zomorrodi R, Saeki T, Rajji TK, Blumberger DM, Daskalakis ZJ, et al. Resting-state EEG gamma power and theta-gamma coupling enhancement following high-frequency left dorsolateral prefrontal rTMS in patients with depression. Clinical Neurophysiol. 2017;128(3):424–432. pmid:28160748
- 32. Glim S, Okazaki YO, Nakagawa Y, Mizuno Y, Hanakawa T, Kitajo K. Phase-amplitude coupling of neural oscillations can be effectively probed with concurrent TMS-EEG. Neural Plast. 2019;2019(6263907):1–13.
- 33. Cohen MX. Multivariate cross-frequency coupling via generalized eigendecomposition. eLife. 2017;6(e21792):1–26.
- 34. Tognoli E, Kelso JAS. The metastable brain. Neuron. 2014;81(1):35–48.
- 35. Lakatos P, Shah AS, Knuth KH, Ulbert I, Karmos G, Schroeder CE. An oscillatory hierarchy controlling neuronal excitability and stimulus processing in the auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94(3):1904–1911.
- 36. Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Skinner R, Martin J, Clubley E. The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, malesand females, scientists and mathematicians. J Autism Dev Disord. 2001;31(1):5–17.
- 37. Wakabayashi A, Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Tojo Y. The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ) in Japan: a cross-cultural comparison. J Autism Dev Disord. 2006;36(2):263–270.
- 38. Suetani H, Kitajo K. A manifold learning approach to mapping individuality of human brain oscillations through beta-divergence. Neurosci Res. 2020;156:188–196.
- 39. Kitajo K, Sase T, Mizuno Y, Suetani H. Consistency in macroscopic human brain responses to noisy time-varying visual inputs. bioRxiv. 2019;https://doi.org/10.1101/645499.
- 40. Delorme A, Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2004;134(1):9–21.
- 41. Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen JM. FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011(1):1–9.
- 42. Kayser J, Tenke CE. Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: I. Evaluation with auditory oddball tasks. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117(2):348–368.
- 43.
Alzahrani S. FDA LDA multiclass. Database: MATLAB Central File Exchange [Internet]. Available from: https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/45006-fda-lda-multiclass
- 44.
Gias C. Phase randomization. Database: MATLAB Central File Exchange [Internet]. Available from: https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/32621-phase-randomization
- 45.
D’Errico J. nearestSPD. Database: MATLAB Central File Exchange [Internet]. Available from: https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/42885-nearestspd
- 46.
Fukunaga K. Introduction to statistical pattern recognition. 2nd ed. Boston: Academic Press; 1990.
- 47. Komuro M, Kamiyama K, Endo T, Aihara K. Quasi-periodic bifurcations of higher-dimensional tori. Int J Bifur Chaos. 2016;26(7):1630016.
- 48. Samiee S, Baillet S. Time-resolved phase-amplitude coupling in neural oscillations. NeuroImage. 2017;159:270–279.
- 49. Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, Varela FJ. Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum Brain Mapp. 1999;8(4):194–208.
- 50. Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Quen MLV, Lutz A, Martinerie J, Varela FJ. Studying single-trials of phase synchronous activity in the brain. Int J Bifur Chaos. 2000;10(10):2429–2439.
- 51. He BJ, Zempel JM, Snyder AZ, Raichle ME. The temporal structures and functional significance of scale-free brain activity. Neuron. 2010;66(3):353–369.
- 52. Caliński T, Harabasz J. A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Commun Stat. 1974;3(1):1–27.
- 53.
Su T, Dy J. A deterministic method for initializing K-means clustering. In: Proc. 16th IEEE Int. Conf. Tools Artif. Intell.; 2004. p. 784–786.
- 54. Prichard D, Theiler J. Generating surrogate data for time series with several simultaneously measured variables. Phys Rev Lett. 1994;73(7):951–954.
- 55. Perrin F, Pernier J, Bertrand O, Echallier JF. Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989;72(2):184–187.
- 56. Tenke CE, Kayser J. Generator localization by current source density (CSD): implications of volume conduction and field closure at intracranial and scalp resolutions. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123(12):2328–2345.
- 57. Aoyagi T. Network of neural oscillators for retrieving phase information. Phys Rev Lett. 1995;74(20):4075–4078.
- 58. Heitmann S, Breakspear M. Putting the “dynamic” back into dynamic functional connectivity. Network Neurosci. 2018;2(2):150–174.
- 59. Maruyama G. Continuous Markov processes and stochastic equations. Circ Mat Palermo. 1955;4:48–90.
- 60. Higham NJ. Computing a nearest symmetric positive semidefinite matrix. Linear Algebra Appl. 1988;103:103–118.
- 61. Amari S. Neural theory of association and concept-formation. Biol Cybern. 1977;26:175–185.
- 62. Toya K, Fukushima K, Kabashima Y, Okada M. Bistability of mixed states in a neural network storing hierarchical patterns. J Phys A Math Gen. 2000;33(14):2725–2737.
- 63. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Statist Soc B. 1995;57(1):289–300.
- 64.
Iglewicz B, Hoaglin DC. How to detect and handle outliers. Milwaukee: WI: ASQC Quality Press; 1993.
- 65. Cohen MX, Elger CE, Fell J. Oscillatory activity and phase-amplitude coupling in the human medial frontal cortex during decision making. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009;21(2):390–402.
- 66. Voytek B, Canolty RT, Shestyuk A, Crone NE, Parvizi J, Knight RT. Shifts in gamma phase-amplitude coupling frequency from theta to alpha over posterior cortex during visual tasks. Front Hum Neurosci. 2010;4(191):1–9.
- 67. Raichle ME. The restless brain. Brain Connect. 2011;1(1):106–113.
- 68. Tort ABL, Kramer MA, Thorn C, Gibson DJ, Kubota Y, Graybiel AM, et al. Dynamic cross-frequency couplings of local field potential oscillations in rat striatum and hippocampus during performance of a T-maze task. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(51):20517–20522. pmid:19074268
- 69. Tort ABL, Komorowski RW, Manns JR, Kopell NJ, Eichenbaum H. Theta-gamma coupling increases during the learning of item-context associations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(49):20942–20947.
- 70. Szczepanski SM, Crone NE, Kuperman RA, Auguste KI, Parvizi J, Knight RT. Dynamic changes in phase-amplitude coupling facilitate spatial attention control in fronto-parietal cortex. PLoS Biol. 2014;12(8):e1001936.
- 71. Kajihara T, Anwar MN, Kawasaki M, Mizuno Y, Nakazawa K, Kitajo K. Neural dynamics in motor preparation: from phase-mediated global computation to amplitude-mediated local computation. NeuroImage. 2015;118:445–455.
- 72. Moussa MN, Steen MB, Laurienti PJ, Hayasaka S. Consistency of network modules in resting-state fMRI connectome data. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(8):e4428.
- 73. Raichle ME. The brain’s default mode network. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2015;38:433–447.
- 74. Mantini D, Perrucci MG, Gratta CD, Romani GL, Corbetta M. Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(32):13170–13175.
- 75. Britz J, Ville DVD, Michel CM. BOLD correlates of EEG topography reveal rapid resting-state network dynamics. NeuroImage. 2010;52(4):1162–1170.
- 76. Liu Q, Farahibozorg S, Porcaro C, Wenderoth N, Mantini D. Detecting large-scale networks in the human brain using high-density electroencephalography. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017;38(9):4631–4643.
- 77. Schroeder CE, Lakatos P. Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection. Trends Neurosci. 2008;32(1):9–18.
- 78. Jensen O, Mazaheri A. Shaping functional architecture by oscillatory alpha activity: gating by inhibition. Front Hum Neurosci. 2010;4(186):98–113.
- 79. Okazaki YO, Horschig JM, Luther L, Oostenveld R, Murakami I, Jensen O. Real-time MEG neurofeedback training of posterior alpha activity modulates subsequent visual detection performance. NeuroImage. 2015;107:323–332.
- 80. Haegens S, Cousijn H, Wallis G, Harrison PJ, Nobre AC. Inter- and intra-individual variability in alpha peak frequency. NeuroImage. 2014;92:46–55.
- 81. Watanabe T, Rees G, Masuda N. Atypical intrinsic neural timescale in autism. eLIFE. 2019;8(e42256):1–16.
- 82. Himberger KD, Chien HY, Honey CJ. Principles of temporal processing across the cortical hierarchy. Neuroscience. 2018;389:161–174.
- 83. Linkenkaer-Hansen K, Nikouline VV, Palva JM, Ilmoniemi RJ. Long-range temporal correlations and scaling behavior in human brain oscillations. J Neurosci. 2001;21(4):1370–1377.
- 84. Deco G, Kringelbach ML, Jirsa VK, Ritter P. The dynamics of resting fluctuations in the brain: metastability and its dynamical cortical core. Sci Rep. 2017;7(3095):1–14.
- 85. Hiltunen T, Kantola J, Elseoud AA, Lepola P, Suominen K, Starck T, et al. Infra-slow EEG fluctuations are correlated with resting-state network dynamics in fMRI. J Neurosci. 2014;34(2):356–362. pmid:24403137
- 86. Watanabe T, Rees G. Brain network dynamics in high-functioning individuals with autism. Nat Commun. 2017;8(16048):1–14.
- 87. Ezaki T, Watanabe T, Ohzeki M, Masuda N. Energy landscape analysis of neuroimaging data. Philos Trans A. 2018;375(2096):1–14.
- 88. Kelso JAS. Multistability and metastability: understanding dynamic coordination in the brain. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2012;367:906–918.
- 89. Cabral J, Vidaurre D, Marques P, Magalhães R, Moreira PS, Soares JM, et al. Cognitive performance in healthy older adults relates to spontaneous switching between states of functional connectivity during rest. Sci Rep. 2017;7(5135):1–13. pmid:28698644
- 90. Sasaki T, Matsuki N, Ikegaya Y. Metastability of active CA3 Networks. J Neurosci. 2007;27(3):517–528.
- 91. Roberts JA, Gollo LL, Abeysuriya RG, Roberts G, Mitchell PB, Woolrich MW, et al. Metastable brain waves. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1056):1–17. pmid:30837462
- 92. Kaneko K, Tsuda I. Chaotic itinerancy. Chaos. 2003;13:926.
- 93. Kitajo K, Nozaki D, Ward LM, Yamamoto Y. Behavioral stochastic resonance within the human brain. Phys Rev Lett. 2003;90(21):218103.
- 94. Kitajo K, Doesburg SM, Yamanaka K, Nozaki D, Ward LM, Yamamoto Y. Noise-induced large-scale phase synchronization of human-brain activity associated with behavioral stochastic resonance. Europhys Lett. 2007;80(4):40009.
- 95. Sase T, Ramírez JP, Kitajo K, Aihara K, Hirata Y. Estimating the level of dynamical noise in time series by using fractal dimensions. Phys Lett A. 2016;380(11–12):1151–1163.
- 96. Preti MG, Bolton TA, Ville DVD. The dynamic functional connectome: state-of-the-art and perspectives. NeuroImage. 2017;160:41–54.
- 97. Cohen JR. The behavioral and cognitive relevance of time-varying, dynamic changes in functional connectivity. NeuroImage. 2018;180:515–525.
- 98. Palmigiano A, Geisel T, Wolf F, Battaglia D. Flexible information routing by transient synchrony. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20(7):1014–1022.
- 99. He BJ. Spontaneous and task-evoked brain activity negatively interact. J Neurosci. 2013;33(11):4672–4682.
- 100. Luczak A, Barthó P, Harris KD. Spontaneous events outline the realm of possible sensory responses in neocortical populations. Neuron. 2009;62(3):413–425.
- 101. Ponce-Alvarez A, He BJ, Hagmann P, Deco G. Task-driven activity reduces the cortical activity space of the brain: experiment and whole-brain modeling. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015;11(8):e1004445.
- 102. Yahata N, Morimoto J, Hashimoto R, Lisi G, Shibata K, Kawakubo Y, et al. A small number of abnormal brain connections predicts adult autism spectrum disorder. Nat Commun. 2016;7(11254):517–528. pmid:27075704
- 103. Kawasaki M, Kitajo K, Fukao K, Murai T, Yamaguchi Y, Funabiki Y. Frontal theta activation during motor synchronization in autism. Sci Rep. 2017;7(15034):1–8.
- 104. Kawasaki M, Uno Y, Mori J, Kobata K, Kitajo K. Transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced global propagation of transient phase resetting associated with directional information flow. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8(173):1–13.