Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Simulation results using SMAHP (penalizations + SIS), SIS + SIS, and naïve approaches. The data were simulated with censoring rate of 25%.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Simulation results using SMAHP (penalizations + SIS), SIS + SIS, and naïve approaches. The data were simulated with censoring rate of 50%.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Simulation results using SMAHP (penalizations + SIS), SIS + SIS, and naïve approaches. The data were simulated with censoring rate of 75%.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 1.

A directed acyclic graph summarizing the analysis of CPTAC HNSCC data, highlighting direct and indirect effects with 95% confidence intervals in parentheses using SMAHP.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

A causal diagram to describe the framework of the mediation analysis of high-dimensional mediators with multivariable exposures and survival endpoint.

Here, the two types of effects are assessed: (1) the global indirect effect between and T, and specific mediation effect that is mediated by a mediator variable for each proteome that is selected from the penalized variable selection (nodes colored in blue) and (2) the direct effect between multivariable exposures RNA-Seq gene expressions (nodes colored in orange) and survival outcome T (a node colored in red).

More »

Fig 2 Expand