Table 1.
Comparison of full total order sensitivity indices for the linear function across different GSA methods. Estimates are reported as bootstrap means.
Table 2.
Comparison of full total order sensitivity indices for the Ishigami function across different GSA methods. Estimates are reported as bootstrap means.
Table 3.
Comparison of full total order sensitivity indices for the Sobol g-function across different GSA methods. Estimates are reported as bootstrap means.
Table 4.
Comparison of running times of different GSA methods for the Sobol g-function.
Fig 1.
Compartmental transmission diagram and corresponding system of ODEs.
Fig 2.
Column swapping in Sobol’s two-matrix estimator ignores Bayesian-calibrated parameter correlations, leading to distorted predictive distributions of .
Fig 3.
Empirical marginal density comparison between posterior samples and autoregressive model generated samples.
Fig 4.
GSA results for the SIR model using an autoregressive model. Estimates are reported as bootstrap means, with error bars indicating 95% bootstrap confidence intervals.
Fig 5.
Compartmental transmission diagram and corresponding system of ODEs.
Fig 6.
GSA results for the CAR-T model using a diffusion model. Estimates are reported as bootstrap means, with error bars indicating 95% bootstrap confidence intervals.