Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Performance comparison of different algorithms based on five indicators.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

ROC curves of ASGCL model and five comparison models.

(a) ROC curves on GDSC dataset (b) ROC curves on CCLE dataset.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Scatter plot of predicting drug response (IC50 value) in GDSC using ASGCL model.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Predict the IC50 values of unknown cell line drug reactions grouped by drugs.

Drugs are classified based on the median predicted IC50 values of all missing cell lines, and the top 10 drugs with the highest median IC50 have the worst efficacy; The last 10 drugs with the lowest IC50 median may be the most effective.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Ablation experiments using different contrasting methods.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Research on ablation of nonlinear subspaces.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Comparative experiments on different graph encoders in different neighborhoods.

(a) Experimental results of GCN on different neighborhood layers (b) Experimental results of GAT on different neighborhood layers

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

The impact of the parameter.

on the ASGCL model’s performance is demonstrated, where the blue dotted line represents the baseline result of the ASGCL model on the GDSC dataset when the parameter ρ is not introduced.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

The impact of the parameter on ρ.

The ASGCL model’s performance is demonstrated, where the blue dotted line represents the baseline result of the ASGCL model on the GDSC dataset when the parameter is not introduced.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

The parameter and ρ impact the performance of the ASGCL model on the GDSC dataset.

In the graph, the colors represent the magnitude of the ASGCL’s performance: darker colors correspond to higher AUC values, while lighter colors indicate lower AUC values.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Schematic diagram of the ASGCL model.

Module A utilizes a nonlinear subspace to extract cell line and drug features as primary characteristics; Module B, named GraphMorpher, adaptively sparsify the input graph structure; Module C is a contrastive learning module, which enhances the model’s discriminative ability by processing and comparing multiple graph structures.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Schematic diagram of nonlinear subspace module.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

GraphMorpher diagram.

More »

Fig 11 Expand