Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Metapopulation model notation.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

The instance of MaxCasesAverted and MaxPeaksReduced is a graph G constructed from the given instance of Max k-SI.

Each node represents a subpopulation, with the size of the subpopulation shown in square brackets next to it. The directed edges permit 1 unit flow. The unit flows from nodes Pj to pi encode non-membership. For example, the flow from P1 to p2 implies that .

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of greedy algorithms presented in this section. Details of approximation factors for FastGreedy and UnitGreedy may be found in [26] and [25], respectively.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Percentage totBurden and percentage maxBurden reduced by all approaches for = 0.5345 in New Hampshire for FRED (first column) and SafeGraph (second column).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Percentage totBurden and percentage maxBurden reduced by UnitGreedy, SingletonGreedy, FastGreedy and baselines for = 0.535 in Iowa for FRED (first column) and SafeGraph (second column).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Percentage totBurden and percentage maxBurden reduced by UnitGreedy, FastGreedy and baselines for = 0.525 in Texas for FRED (first column) and SafeGraph (second column).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Approximation factors for each problem instance.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Estimates of for each problem instance.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

FastGreedy, UnitGreedy, SingletonGreedy, 3-EnumGreedy, and POMS comparison with respect to practical running time (estimated for POMS) to achieve approximation guarantee for New Hampshire with and budgets.

More »

Table 5 Expand