Fig 1.
Whole-brain dynamic mean field model.
The DMF model has several inputs. A: BOLD signals from fMRI data, B: a parcellation, in our case comprising 20 atlas regions, and C: the individual connectome obtained from DTI. D: Applying the parcellation to the fMRI and DTI datasets, we obtained 20 time-series signals and a 20 × 20 matrix representing the connectome. E: BOLD-like signals are simulated using the connectome and different values of the coupling parameter G. For each G, we compare the simulated and empirical data using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance (d) over the distribution of values of the FC matrices. Finally, the selected optimal G is the value that minimizes this distance.
Fig 2.
The DMF model reproduces the statistically significant differences in the high-order interactions of redundancy.
A: First, the within age-group average SC matrix was calculated. B: Next, the optimal G value for each group was obtained. C: We simulated brain activity within each group using the average SC and the corresponding optimal Gi, computed the O-information as a function of the interaction order, and separated sets of elements into the dominantly redundant (positive O-information values) and synergistic (negative O-information values). Here, the total redundancy (R) and synergy (S) was obtained as the average O-information over the redundant and synergistic sets, respectively. The p-values of the Wilcoxon rank-sum test are also depicted as a function of the interaction order, after comparing the values in I4 versus the ones obtained from the combination of (I1, I2, and I3). When the value of redundancy (or synergy) survived the false discovery rate (FDR) correction, the diamonds (or circles) were filled.
Fig 3.
Connectome-based ageing model.
A: A polynomial fit of second degree was used to link the weights of the average connectome within I1, denoted by , and the corresponding ones in I4 (
). B: (left) Twenty-eight empirical young connectomes are transformed by the second-order polynomial fit, obtaining the synthetic aged connectomes (right). C: We simulated the DMF model of the aged connectomes and the optimal value G4. The O-information was assessed and separated into the total redundancy (left) and synergy (center). The third panel at the right corresponds to the p-values of the Wilcoxon rank-sum test after comparing the redundancy and synergy of the synthetic I4 group with the ones in I1. When the value of redundancy or synergy survived multiple-comparison correction, both the diamonds and circles were filled.
Fig 4.
Heterogeneity of the connectome degeneration.
A: The non-parametric Spearman’s rank-correlation r between age and individual weights wij of the SC matrix was calculated across all different participants (N = 161). The final number of weights that survived to multiple comparisons is represented in the right panel, with values ranging from -0.25 to -0.50. B: We built a new connectivity matrix using as links the absolute values of r obtained for each weight (left panel). Next, the Leuven community detection method was applied before correcting for multiple comparison and three main communities (center) were found. The links that belong to each community and that survived Bonferroni correction are also shown (right). As an illustration, we show one arbitrary link within each of these communities (colored in green and pink). Here, |r| denotes the absolute values of all elements of matrix r.
Table 1.
Dynamic Mean Field (DMF) model parameters.