Fig 1.
Stochastic resonance occurs when an optimal level of noise is added to a subthreshold signal.
In this example the signal alone (red sinusoid) remains below the perceptual threshold (dotted line). Adding an optimal amount of noise (gray line) periodically raises the stimulus above the system threshold. If the added noise is too weak, the threshold is not crossed. Conversely, if the noise is too strong the signal remains buried and cannot be discriminated from the noise [14].
Fig 2.
A: Schematic of the drift diffusion modelling (DDM) framework used to model perceptual decision-making in the dot motion task. In the model, evidence is accumulated over time until a response boundary is crossed. t is the non-decision time, which includes the time taken to execute a motor response. v is the drift rate, which reflects the rate at which sensory evidence is accumulated. This parameter is taken as an index of the quality of sensory information. a represents the boundary separation (correct at the top, incorrect at the bottom), indicating how much information is needed to make a decision. B: Schematic of the random dot-motion task in which participants judged whether signal dots moved on average to the left or right. Task difficulty was titrated by altering the proportion of coherently moving dots (shown with arrows attached, for purposes of illustration) amongst randomly moving dots. In this example the coherent motion is rightward, but in the experiment the dots were equally likely to move toward the left or right. The circles surrounding the dot stimuli are shown here for illustration only, and were not present in the actual displays.
Fig 3.
Effects of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on perceptual decision-making in the dot-motion discrimination task for bilateral stimulation.
The left panel shows performance for each motion coherence level as a function of tRNS intensity. The right panel shows the drift rate derived from modelling of the data shown in the corresponding plot to the left. *pcorrected < 0.05.
Fig 4.
Electrode pad montages and modelled electrical field strength (normE) for each of the three tRNS experiments.
A. Bilateral visual cortex stimulation (Experiment 1). B. Left visual cortex stimulation (Experiment 2). C. Right visual cortex stimulation (Experiment 3).
Fig 5.
Effects of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on perceptual decision-making in the dot-motion discrimination task for unilateral stimulation of the left visual cortex (A) and right visual cortex (B).
The left panels show performance for each motion coherence level as a function of tRNS intensity. The right panels show the drift rate derived from modelling of the data shown in the corresponding plots to the left.