An evolutionary approach to predict the orientation of CRISPR arrays
Fig 3
Comparison between acquisition- and PAM-orientation.
We compare the predictions between the PAM-orientation and CRISPR-evOr broken down according to Cas type. Only subtypes with at least 5 groups with more than 50 arrays are shown. While there are many arrays were both methods can not make confident decisions, in cases where they are confident, they almost always agree, but type II-C deviates from this behavior.