Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

Simulation of 69 microbial communities indicates sequencing depth and false positives are major drivers of bias in prokaryotic metagenome-assembled genome recovery

Fig 3

Student’s Bonferroni adjusted t-test comparing metagenome-assemble genome counts between all pipelines used (8K, DT, and MM) according to Taxonomic relatedness (Not related; Closely related; Very closely related) and species abundance distribution (Logarithmic decay; Exponential decay; Logarithmic decay with abundance plateaus; Exponential decay with abundance plateaus).

The sequencing depth of the communities was kept at 60 million reads. (*P-value < 0.05).

Fig 3

doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012530.g003