Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

Uncovering the organization of neural circuits with Generalized Phase Locking Analysis

Fig 1

Interpretability of multivariate SFC through GPLA.

(A) Schematic for the concept of biophysical interpretability. A biophysical model allows to make predictions about some observable quantity derived from neural data, that we call Quantity of Interest (QoI). The QoI is biophysically interpretable whenever its variations can be explained by changes in some property of the model. (B) (Top-left) A coupling matrix is estimated from electrophysiology data by gathering complex SFC estimates of all spike-LFP pairs in a rectangular matrix. Coefficients (Cnm) contain information similar to complex-valued PLV up to a scaling factor: the magnitude indicates the strength of coupling, and the angle reflects the average timing of the spike occurrence within the period of the corresponding LFP oscillation. (Bottom-left) The coupling matrix can be approximated using its largest singular value and the corresponding singular vectors. Singular vectors represent the dominant LFP (blue array) and spiking patterns (red array) and the singular value (d1), called generalized Phase Locking Value (gPLV), characterizes the spike-field coupling strength for the phenomenon under study and the chosen frequency. The magnitude of each vector entry indicates a relative coupling of the corresponding unit/channel, and the phase indicates the relative timing with respect to other units/channels. By convention, the phase of the LFP vector coefficients’ average is set to zero, such that the phase of the spike vector average reflects the overall phase shift of the spike pattern with respect to the LFP pattern. (Top-right) A biophysical model accounts for the underlying network connectivity and dynamics, as well as the measurement process that leads to the collected data. This leads to a theoretical account of multivariate spike-field coupling. (Bottom-right) Model reduction entails simplifying assumption, leading to a low-rank description of the coupling in the model based on the key mechanistic parameters. This description is compared to the left-hand side low-rank decomposition, obtained from experimental data, to infer parameters and interpret the data. All clip art in this figure was designed and drawn by authors M.B. and S.S..

Fig 1

doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010983.g001