Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

Recalibrating probabilistic forecasts of epidemics

Fig 8

Improvement in mean log score after recalibration, averaged over all 27 FluSight forecasters, by number of training seasons.

We perform three runs for each of the nine available seasons and n ∈ {1, 2, 4, 8}, where a run consists of randomly sampling n other seasons to train recalibration for each of the 27 FluSight forecasters. Each point in the plot is averaged over 9 × 3 = 27 runs. As expected, the parametric method is more robust to limited training data than the nonparametric method.

Fig 8

doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010771.g008