Investigating differential abundance methods in microbiome data: A benchmark study
Fig 4
False Discovery Rate (FDR) of each differential abundance method for each dataset considered in the comparison in the main scenario with simulated DA features.
In each set of boxes corresponding to the dataset, different percentages (P) of simulated DA features are on rows, while different sample size (SS) values are on columns. The FDR values are averaged over the 50 simulations and the bars show the standard error. The number of runs that provide a defined value of FDR is shown at the beginning of the bars.