Investigating differential abundance methods in microbiome data: A benchmark study
Fig 3
False Positive Rate (FPR) of each differential abundance method for each dataset considered in the comparison in the scenario without simulated DA features.
In each set of boxes corresponding to the dataset, tools are on rows, while different sample size (SS) values are on columns. The FPR values are averaged over the 50 simulations and the bars show the standard error. The ANCOM** label refers to the method run without performing the underlying FDR adjustment.