Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

A weighted constraint satisfaction approach to human goal-directed decision making

Fig 7

Individual differences in weighting subgoal-relevant factors and the subgoal-irrelevant final goal.

A. and B. Subgoal trial path choices associated with the two accuracy groups. As in Fig 6A, the proportion of optimal trials for each individual was converted into a probit score, with individual probit scores larger than 3 or smaller than -3 capped at 3 or -3 before averaging. C. Drift weight estimates in both task conditions for the two accuracy groups.

Fig 7

doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009553.g007