Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

Expectancy-based rhythmic entrainment as continuous Bayesian inference

Fig 6

PATIPPET reproduces human tapping data showing stronger error correction for longer inter-onset intervals.

A and B) The distribution on phase and tempo leading up to and following a phase shift at the fourth event in an isochronous sequence for two different metronome tempi, i.e., two different inter-onset intervals. (Same color key as Fig 5, but with phase/tempo distribution contours strobed every.05 sec). Note that when the IOI is short, PATIPPET arrives at the phase-shifted event with a high degree of phase and tempo certainty. C) PATIPPET makes a proportionally larger correction to phase and tempo for long IOIs than for short IOIs due to the greater degree of uncertainty preceding each event. D) Alpha (α) is the proportion of a phase shift that is corrected at the next tap time. With this set of parameters, PATIPPET reproduces the empirical observation from [35] that the phase shift is undercorrected when IOIs are short and overcorrected α > 1 when IOIs are long.

Fig 6

doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009025.g006