Conventional analysis of trial-by-trial adaptation is biased: Empirical and theoretical support using a Bayesian estimator
Fig 2
Perturbation adaptation and trial-by-trial adaptation rates are different.
(a) Simulated data generated using a Bayesian learner model shows a significant difference between predicted perturbation adaptation rate and trial-by-trial adaptation rate (*** = p<0.001, two-tailed paired t-test). (b) Empirical results from 10 human subjects [25] show the same significant difference between adaptation rate analysis results (*** = p<0.001, two-tailed paired t-test).