Automated visualization of rule-based models
Fig 10
Comparison of readability metrics across visualization methods.
Graph size and edge density averaged over 27 models (geometric mean) for 9 automated visualizations: contact map (cmap), conventional rule visualization (rv), compact rule visualization(crv), Simmune Network Viewer diagram (sim), rule influence diagram (rinf), full model atom-rule graph (ar), AR graph with background removed (ar1), AR graph compressed with strict edge signature (ar2) or permissive edge signature (ar3). The compression pipeline (ar1-3) is semi-automated, but here it was applied automatically with default settings. The full dataset is shown in S3 Fig.