Computational Phenotyping of Two-Person Interactions Reveals Differential Neural Response to Depth-of-Thought
Figure 5
Distribution of depth-of-thought in investors as a function of trustee group.
A) Anonymous trustees (n = 48) remain anonymous to their investor partner for the entire game (and visa versa). B) Borderline personality disorder trustees were identified through an extensive set of formal interview procedures (see King-Casas et al., 2008). On Fisher's exact test, the borderline personality disorder-induced investor depth-of-though distribution was significantly different from investors playing anonymous trustees (panel A; p = 1.68×10−6).