Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closeFig. 2 and text differ
Posted by ssmith279 on 13 Jun 2019 at 23:06 GMT
Hi,
For left plots of Figure 2a,b, legend colors do not match colors in plots.
Figure 2 and article text differ. A few differences noted here:
"At a low sequencing depth of 5X, the TPR of LUMPY reached 0.432, followed by CNVnator (0.370) and GROM-RD (0.359)", whereas Figure 2a indicates Lumpy (0.423) followed by GROM-RD (0.370) and CNVnator (0.359).
"At high sequencing depths of 30X and 50X, CNVnator also showed the highest TPR of 0.725 and 0.800, followed by LUMPY (0.711, 0.753) and RDXplorer (0.678, 0.621)", whereas Figure 2a indicates Lumpy followed by CNVnator and GROM-RD with CNVnator and GROM-RD TPR <0.6.
"The FDR value of iCopyDAV reached a peak value at a 30X depth (0.878), followed by CNVnator (0.767) and RDXplorer (0.731)", whereas Figure 2b indicates CNVnator, followed by RDXplorer and either FREEC or RSicnv.
Thank you,
Sean
RE: Fig. 2 and text differ
wbai521 replied to ssmith279 on 19 Jun 2019 at 08:23 GMT
Thank you very much for pointing out our mistakes. We have contacted the editor to correct these errors as soon as possible.
Best regards,
Wanyu Bai
RE: RE: Fig. 2 and text differ
Zhenglin_DU replied to wbai521 on 29 Sep 2019 at 15:52 GMT
Here is the correction:
https://doi.org/10.1371/j...