Advertisement

Browse Subject Areas

?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

Scientific misconduct

Strong, but Wrong: Lay People’s and Police Officers’ Beliefs about Verbal and Nonverbal Cues to Deception

Glynis Bogaard, Ewout H. Meijer, Aldert Vrij, Harald Merckelbach

Research Integrity and Research Ethics in Professional Codes of Ethics: Survey of Terminology Used by Professional Organizations across Research Disciplines

Dubravka Komić, Stjepan Ljudevit Marušić, Ana Marušić

Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity

Daniele Fanelli, Rodrigo Costas, Vincent Larivière

Does Exonerating an Accused Researcher Restore the Researcher’s Credibility?

Tobias Greitemeyer, Christina Sagioglou

Linguistic Traces of a Scientific Fraud: The Case of Diederik Stapel

David M. Markowitz, Jeffrey T. Hancock

Fate of Articles That Warranted Retraction Due to Ethical Concerns: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study

Nadia Elia, Elizabeth Wager, Martin R. Tramèr

Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?

R. Grant Steen, Arturo Casadevall, Ferric C. Fang

Misconduct Policies in High-Impact Biomedical Journals

Xavier Bosch, Cristina Hernández, [ ... ], Ana Marušić

A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature

Michael L. Grieneisen, Minghua Zhang

Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data

Daniele Fanelli

How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data

Daniele Fanelli

Advertisement

Create a weekly email alert for: Scientific misconduct

You can change these options by clicking profile then "Alerts and Notifications"