Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Staphylococcus aureus in a Brazilian elderly cohort

  • Rosemeire Cobo Zanella ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    rosemeire.zanella@ial.sp.gov.br

    Affiliation National Laboratory for Meningitis and Pneumococcal Infections, Centre of Bacteriology, Institute Adolfo Lutz (IAL), São Paulo, Brazil

  • Maria Cristina de Cunto Brandileone,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation National Laboratory for Meningitis and Pneumococcal Infections, Centre of Bacteriology, Institute Adolfo Lutz (IAL), São Paulo, Brazil

  • Samanta Cristine Grassi Almeida,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation National Laboratory for Meningitis and Pneumococcal Infections, Centre of Bacteriology, Institute Adolfo Lutz (IAL), São Paulo, Brazil

  • Ana Paula Silva de Lemos,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation National Laboratory for Meningitis and Pneumococcal Infections, Centre of Bacteriology, Institute Adolfo Lutz (IAL), São Paulo, Brazil

  • Claudio Tavares Sacchi,

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Strategic Laboratory, Institute Adolfo Lutz (IAL), São Paulo, Brazil

  • Claudia R. Gonçalves,

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Strategic Laboratory, Institute Adolfo Lutz (IAL), São Paulo, Brazil

  • Maria Gisele Gonçalves,

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Molecular Biology, Centre of Immunology, Institute Adolfo Lutz (IAL), São Paulo, Brazil

  • Lucila Okuyama Fukasawa,

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Molecular Biology, Centre of Immunology, Institute Adolfo Lutz (IAL), São Paulo, Brazil

  • Marcos Daniel Saraiva,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Medical Research Laboratory in Aging (LIM 66) of Geriatrics Division of the Clinics Hospital of the University of São Paulo Medical School (GDCH-USPMS), São Paulo, Brazil

  • Luís Fernando Rangel,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Medical Research Laboratory in Aging (LIM 66) of Geriatrics Division of the Clinics Hospital of the University of São Paulo Medical School (GDCH-USPMS), São Paulo, Brazil

  • Julia Lusis Lassance Cunha,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Medical Research Laboratory in Aging (LIM 66) of Geriatrics Division of the Clinics Hospital of the University of São Paulo Medical School (GDCH-USPMS), São Paulo, Brazil

  • Thereza Cristina Ariza Rotta,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Medical Research Laboratory in Aging (LIM 66) of Geriatrics Division of the Clinics Hospital of the University of São Paulo Medical School (GDCH-USPMS), São Paulo, Brazil

  • Christian Douradinho,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Medical Research Laboratory in Aging (LIM 66) of Geriatrics Division of the Clinics Hospital of the University of São Paulo Medical School (GDCH-USPMS), São Paulo, Brazil

  • Wilson Jacob-Filho,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Medical Research Laboratory in Aging (LIM 66) of Geriatrics Division of the Clinics Hospital of the University of São Paulo Medical School (GDCH-USPMS), São Paulo, Brazil

  • Ruth Minamisava,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation School of Nursing, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil

  •  [ ... ],
  • Ana Lúcia Andrade

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Institute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil

  • [ view all ]
  • [ view less ]

Abstract

We aimed to investigate the nasopharyngeal colonization (NPC) by Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Staphylococcus aureus in the elderly population and to assess the demographic factors associated with NPC. This was an observational cohort study in which outpatients aged ≥60 years were enrolled from April to August 2017, with a follow-up visit from September through December 2017. Nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs were collected, bacteria were detected and isolated, and isolates were subjected to phenotypic and molecular characterization using standard microbiological techniques. At enrolment, the rates of S. aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), H. influenzae, and S. pneumoniae among 776 elderly outpatients were 15.9%, 2.3%, 2.5%, and 2.2%, respectively. Toxin production was detected in 21.1% of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, and three SCCmec types were identified: II/IIb, IVa, and VI. At the follow-up visit, all carriage rates were similar (p > 0.05) to the rates at enrolment. Most of S. pneumoniae serotypes were not included in pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs), except for 7F, 3, and 19A. All strains of H. influenzae were non-typeable. Previous use of antibiotics and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination (p < 0.05) were risk factors for S. aureus and MRSA carriage; S. aureus colonization was also associated with chronic kidney disease (p = 0.021). S. pneumoniae carriage was associated with male gender (p = 0.032) and an absence of diabetes (p = 0.034), while not receiving an influenza vaccine (p = 0.049) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.031) were risk factors for H. influenzae colonization. The frailty of study participants was not associated with colonization status. We found a higher S. aureus carriage rate compared with the S. pneumoniae- and H. influenzae-carriage rates in a well-attended population in a geriatric outpatient clinic. This is one of the few studies conducted in Brazil that can support future colonization studies among elderly individuals.

Introduction

The global elderly population is growing significantly each year, leading to a high risk for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and, consequently, higher mortality due to CAP [1]. In Europe, a comprehensive review analyzed 46 studies on CAP in adults and elderly patients. Isolates were retrieved from different clinical specimens (blood, pleural fluid, bronchial lavage, urine, pleural fluid, and sputum), and Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most frequent cause of CAP (35%), followed by Haemophilus influenzae (13%) and Staphylococcus aureus (<7%) [2]. S. pneumoniae and S. aureus have been identified in approximately 2.5% of elderly patients with post-influenza bacterial pneumonia [3]. S. aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) are associated with exposure to healthcare facilities [4,5].

Bacterial colonization of the upper respiratory tract is asymptomatic and represents the first step of CAP establishment in the host. Therefore, sampling of nasopharynx secretions has been largely used to understand the circulation of respiratory bacteria [6]. Studies on nasopharyngeal colonization (NPC) by S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae have been largely conducted in young children and have provided valuable information on the interaction between carriage and disease. Co-colonization studies related to S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and S. aureus have shown that S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae exhibit synergistic nasopharyngeal (NP) co-habitation, whereas S. aureus tends to show a negative association with S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae [7,8].

Nevertheless, there is limited data regarding bacterial NPC among elderly adults worldwide [9]. No study has evaluated the carrier status in the elderly population in Brazil, which would be extremely important for guiding antimicrobial therapy and implementing preventive measures such as immunization [10]. In Brazil, the National Immunization Program of the Ministry of Health provides the following vaccines for individuals aged ≥ 60 years: influenza, hepatitis B, and DT (diphtheria and tetanus). The 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide (PPSV23) is recommended only on medical advice [11]. The aim of this study was to estimate the carriage rates of S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and S. aureus in asymptomatic elderly outpatients living in São Paulo, Brazil. We also assessed demographic and other potential factors influencing NPC.

Material and methods

Study design and population

This was an observational study assessing a cohort of outpatients attending the Geriatrics Division of the Clinics Hospital of the University of São Paulo Medical School, a public tertiary referral hospital located in the São Paulo municipality, that attends to about 1,400 patients annually. The municipality of São Paulo is the largest city in Brazil, with about 12 million inhabitants. Subjects were enrolled from April through August 2017 (fall-winter, visit 1). The follow-up visit was scheduled from September through December 2017 (spring-summer, visit 2). Eligible participants were aged 60 years or more. The exclusion criteria at the time of the interviews (visit 1 and follow-up visit) were clinical manifestations of infectious diseases, hospitalization, and antibiotic treatment within 7 days prior to data collection.

Data collection.

Baseline demographic information, clinical presentation, and hospital course were recorded in a web-based secure electronic case report form [12]. The clinical and epidemiological characteristics of the participants that were assessed included gender, living in a long-term institution, living with a child (0–18 years old), prior exposure to 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide (PPSV23) and influenza vaccines, race/ethnicity, marital status, education level, hospitalization in the last 6 months, antibiotic use in the last 12 months, and frailty-evaluated by the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) Frailty Scale [13]. Co-morbidity information related to diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease, asthma, and smoking status was collected from medical charts. All enrolled individuals were invited to participate in the follow-up visit. Epidemiologic data including those pertaining to demographic and risk factors were collected by trained field staff. The same study methodology and inclusion/exclusion criteria for enrolment were used in both visits. The sample size for visit 1 (~700 individuals) was calculated based on an estimated 3% colonization rate by S. pneumoniae in the elderly population (2% error, 95% confidence interval [CI], and an effect design of 2.0), considering that an additional 20% of individuals would likely not meet the eligibility criteria [14].

Ethics statement.

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil (No 1794653). All samples and questionnaires were coded after collection and processed in the laboratory using the same identification code for both visits. Data were stored in a dedicated database for heightened data security.

Sample collection and laboratory procedures

One single NP swab was collected and stored according to the World Health Organization working group standard methods using flexible flocked sterile swabs. Swabs were placed into 1.2 mL of STGG (skim milk, tryptone, glucose, and glycerin) liquid transport medium, stored in a cool box, and transported to the Center of Bacteriology at Adolfo Lutz Institute within 3–4 hours of collection [15]. Samples were then vortexed and stored at -70°C. For culture, 120 μL of the thawed STGG was inoculated into TYS broth (Tood-Hewitt broth supplemented with yeast extract and rabbit serum), for enrichment culture; after 6 hours of incubation at 35 ± 2°C in 5% CO2, 10 μL of TYS was inoculated on a sheep blood agar plate. Another STGG aliquot (120 μL) was inoculated on chocolate agar supplemented with IsoVitalex and 300 mg/L bacitracin, and one more aliquot (100 μL) was inoculated on mannitol salt agar (MSA). The blood agar and chocolate plates were incubated at 35 ± 2°C in 5% CO2, and the MSA plate was incubated at 35 ± 2°C for 48 h. The plates were screened for suspect colonies (1 to 3 colonies) of S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and S. aureus. Pneumococcal identification was based on alpha-hemolysis on the blood agar plate and optochin susceptibility and bile solubility tests. S. pneumoniae was serotyped by Quellung reaction with antisera from Statens Serum Institut (Copenhagen, Denmark). Quellung non-typeable pneumococcus strains were tested in eight sequential conventional PCR multiplex assays, which covered 70 serotypes plus the capsule (cps) gene [16]. Penicillin (Pen) and ceftriaxone (Ctx) susceptibility was assessed using an antimicrobial-susceptibility strip test (Liofilchem, Italy), following the CLSI recommendations [17]; the resistance breakpoints for the minimum inhibitory concentration testing (MIC) were ≥0.12 mg/L and ≥1.0 mg/L for Pen and Ctx, respectively. H. influenzae was confirmed using the hpd3 target and genotyped by a qPCR assay [18, 19]. S. aureus screening was performed by Staphclin Latex (Laborclin, Brazil); species confirmation (nuc gene), detection of oxacillin resistance (mecA gene), and evaluation of toxin production (Panton-Valentine leukocidin—PVL, toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 -TSST-1, and staphylococcal enterotoxins—SE types A-E) were performed by qPCR [2022]. Multiplex PCR was used to characterize staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) elements [23].

S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae were also detected by qPCR. An STGG aliquot (500 μl) was incubated with lysozyme (0.015 g/mL) and mutanolysin (25 U/mL) (Sigma Chemicals) [24]. DNA was extracted and purified using the Purelink Genomic DNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen) and concentrated 5-fold with elution buffer. DNA was tested by qPCR for the presence of the lytA gene (S. pneumoniae), hpd3 gene (H. influenzae), and human RNaseP gene [18]. Multiplex qPCR serotype assay for 21 serotypes was performed on all lytA-positive NP specimens [16]. Samples with positive qPCR results for S. pneumoniae (Ct ≤ 30) but with negative results in the multiplex qPCR serotype assay were analyzed by conventional multiplex PCR to detect other possible serotypes [24]. H. influenzae-positive samples were genotyped in qPCR assays to detect six serotypes [19].

Data analysis

The primary outcomes were colonization by S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae (culture and qPCR) and S. aureus (culture). Co-colonization was defined when the participant was simultaneously colonized by ≥2 bacterial species. We investigated the rates and respective 95% confidence intervals of S. pneumoniae, S. aureus, and H. influenzae colonization for participants attending both visit 1 and the follow-up visit. At enrolment, we compared demographics and clinical characteristics between the carrier and non-carrier groups of S. aureus, MRSA, S. pneumoniae, and H. influenzae. A descriptive analysis was performed with the clinical and demographic characteristics of the participants. The Mann-Whitney test was used to test for differences in medians of age between men and women. The chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test were used to compare the proportions of variables between the carrier and non-carrier groups. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 820 participants were recruited in visit 1, of which 44 (5.1%) were excluded due to antibiotic use in the last 7 days (n = 26; 3.2%), refusal to participate in the study (n = 7; 0.9%), inability to speak Portuguese (n = 1; 0.1%), clinical decompensation (n = 2; 0.2%), cognitive impairment severe enough to compromise understanding of the NP swab (n = 4; 0.5%), sample collection performed in duplicate (n = 2; 0.2%), and intercurrence during sample transport (n = 2; 0.2%). Thus, 776 elderly subjects were included in assessments at visit 1 (mean age: 81.5 years; range: 60–102 years). Of these, 192 (22.3%) were lost to follow-up due to non-attendance (n = 148; 19.1%), death (n = 25; 3.2%), antibiotic use in the last 7 days (n = 16; 2.7%), and refusal to participate (n = 3; 0.5%). Thus, 584 (75.3%) participants were included for analysis at the follow-up visit and their mean age was 81.9 years (range: 60–103 years old). The mean interval between visit 1 and the follow-up visit was 133 days.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants during visit 1 and the follow-up visit are shown in Table 1. Overall, females (mean, 82 yr; range, 60–102 yr) were older than males (mean, 80.5 yr; range, 61–96 yr) (p = 0.005). About 70% of the participants were female, and only 2% lived in a long-term institution. Most participants reported no COPD, no asthma, and no smoking and had received the influenza vaccine in 2017 (88.92%; 690/776).

thumbnail
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of elderly participants in both visit 1 and the follow-up visit (visit 2)a.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221525.t001

NP-carriage data are provided in Table 2. Similar colonization rates were found during visit 1 and in the follow-up visit for all three bacteria. In visit 1, S. aureus was found in 15.9% (123/776) of the participants, and 2.3% (18/776) harbored MRSA. Three distinct SCCmec types were characterized among the MRSA strains (7 II/IIb, 5 IVa, 2 VI), while in four SCCmec type could not determine (ND). Toxin and SE genes were detected in 21.1% (26/123) of the S. aureus strains; 17 S. aureus strains harbored one unique gene (5 TSST-1, 4 SEA, 3 SEB, 2 SEC, 2 PVL, and 1 SEA), whereas multiple virulence genes were identified in 9 S. aureus strains (4 TSST-1/SEA, 3 SEA/SEB, 1 PVL/SEA/SEB, and 1 SEA/SEC). All 26 toxin-producing S. aureus strains were methicillin-sensitive (MSSA). Among all S. aureus carriers, 9.1% (n = 53) showed colonization in both visits. Data on the MRSA-carriage characteristics and the respective types of SCCmec elements is given in the supplemental material S1 Table.

thumbnail
Table 2. Nasopharyngeal carriage prevalence of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and Haemophilus influenzae in elderly individuals > 60 years of age considering the subset of participants seen in both visit 1 and the follow-up visit (visit 2; n = 584).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221525.t002

At visit 1, S. pneumoniae was detected in 2.2% (17/776) of the participants, with the following non-preventable serotypes/genotypes (6C, 35B, 20, 15B, 23A, 22F/22A, one each; 34, 9N, 28A, two each); in five pneumococcal qPCR-positive samples, the serotype/genotype was not determined (ND). In the follow-up visit (2.6%, 15/584; the serotypes/genotypes were 3, 7F, 13, 15C, 28A, 34, [one each]; 19A, 23A [two each], and five not determined [ND] pneumococcal qPCR-positive samples), only three preventable serotype/genotypes (3, 7F, and 19A) were detected. Among the 9 S. pneumoniae carriers identified in both visit 1 and the follow-up visit, only one showed the same serotype 34. Three S. pneumoniae strains were considered Pen-resistant, two with MIC = 0.125 mg/L, one in visit 1 (type 6C) and one in the follow-up visit (type 15C), and one with MIC = 2 mg/L (type 19A) that was also Ctx-resistant (MIC = 1 mg/L) in the follow-up visit. H. influenzae was found in 2.5% (19/776) of the samples in visit 1 and 1.7% (10/584) in the follow-up visit. Among the 14 H. influenzae carriers, only one showed colonization in both visits. qPCR enabled detection of six pneumococcal carriers at visit 1 and another six cases at the follow-up visit that were negative by culture, and 7 and 4 cases of H. influenzae in the respective visits with negative cultures. The data are presented in the supplemental material (S2 Table).

Co-colonization was identified among 9 participants (1.1%) at visit 1: S. pneumoniae—H. influenzae—S. aureus and S. pneumoniae—H. influenzae (n = 1 each), H. influenzae—S. aureus (n = 3, one MRSA), and S. pneumoniae—S. aureus (n = 4). At visit 2, five other participants were carrying S. pneumoniae—S. aureus (n = 3), H. influenzae—S. pneumoniae (n = 1), or H. influenzae—S. aureus (n = 1).

We did not detect differences in age between males and females in carriage, for any of the studied bacteria (Mann-Whitney test, p > 0.05). The risk factors associated with S. aureus and MRSA colonization were the use of antibiotics in the last 12 months and PPSV23 vaccination (p < 0.05); S. aureus was also associated with chronic kidney disease (p = 0.021). S. pneumoniae carriage was associated with male gender (p = 0.032) and an absence of diabetes (p = 0.034); and failure to receive an influenza vaccine (p = 0.049). COPD (p = 0.031) was associated with H. influenzae carriage. Frailty was not associated with carriage by S. aureus, S. pneumoniae, and H. influenzae (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Demographic characteristics, medical conditions, and risk factors for carriage of Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae in visit 1 among elderly participantsa (N = 776).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221525.t003

Discussion

We examined NP carriage for three bacterial pathogens in elderly outpatients attending the biggest geriatric clinic of São Paulo city. The main finding of our study was the high prevalence of S. aureus carriers in contrast to the low prevalence of H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae carriers. These results are consistent with the reports on a co-habitation relationship of these three bacteria in children that show a synergic association between H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae in the respiratory mucosa ad the competition between these bacteria and S. aureus for the niche of the nasopharynx [2527].

High rates of S. aureus in nasal swabs among adults ≥ 60 years old from community have been described in Brazil (17.8%), Australia (23.1%), Denmark (24.1%), UK (25.8%) and Germany (28.5%) [2832]. Another Brazilian study that investigated the rate of nasal S. aureus carriers among adults from a primary-healthcare unit found a rate of 11.5% [33]. A Portuguese study on S. aureus prevalence that used NP swabs showed a 13.3% carriage rate [4], similar to the result found in our study. Little information is available on MRSA carriage in elderly individuals, with rates varying from 0.7 to 2.0% in Portugal, Brazil, Australian, Danish, and British studies, very similar to our findings (2.3%) [4,2831]. In contrast, a higher MRSA colonization rate was found in a Maltese study (4.8%) among 83 healthy elderly, and in a recent Brazilian study (3.7%) among elderly people living in a nursing home, which is a setting with a higher risk for MRSA reservoirs and a source of dissemination to hospital environments [5,34]. None of the MRSA strains harbored virulence factor genes (i.e., PVL, TSST-1, and enterotoxins), similar to the results found in other studies [4,28,29]. However, we found that 20% of the MSSA isolates harbored these toxins and enterotoxins. A higher frequency of virulence genes in MSSA strains has been reported in studies with hospital strains [35,36]. This finding shows that despite the importance of knowledge about the dissemination of MRSA strains, knowledge of the spread of MSSA carrying virulence factors is also important for the health of the population, which also represents an important source of infection. Our results indicate that the previous use of antibiotics and chronic kidney disease were risk factors associated with colonization by S. aureus and MRSA. Among participants with chronic kidney disease, few were undergoing hemodialysis, so this specific risk factor cannot be assessed for this population. The MRSA carrier status was also associated with PPSV23 vaccination, which is an unexpected result since this vaccine does not act in the colonization state. Interactions among pathogens could be considered as a factor for this association, but co-colonization was found in only 1.0% of those vaccinated with PPV23, and 0.5% of the unvaccinated participants. Thus, the sample size was too small to support this possible interaction between S. aureus and S. pneumoniae.

Globally, a low NP prevalence of S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae has been reported in adults in contrast to the high rates usually found in children (~50%), although these pathogens are clinically relevant as a cause of CAP in children and elderly adults [10,37,38]. In Kenya, NP carriage of S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae in adults aged >50 years has been reported to be 4.7% and 2.8%, respectively [37]. In Finland, the NP prevalence of S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae was 5.3 and 1.0%, respectively [39]. Pneumococcal NP colonization has also been evaluated in adults >60 years in other countries, such as Belgium (5.5%), Israel (4.6%), and Italy (7.6%) [9,38,40]. It is noteworthy that in the present study, few participants lived with children (n = 134), and only 1.5% (n = 2) showed positive cultures for S. pneumoniae while 3% (n = 4) showed positive cultures for H. influenzae. As children are considered the main source for transmission of these bacteria in the community, this fact would partially explain the lower carriage rates. Although contact between elderly individuals and children is very common, residing with children is not so common for the elderly population.

We did not find differences in bacterial carriage rates between the fall-winter and spring-summer periods, although seasonality may influence NPC by respiratory pathogens. This finding may be due to the high rate of influenza vaccine immunization reported by the study participants. Studies worldwide have shown an association between S. pneumoniae colonization and diabetes [41], but our results did not show this association, being an unexpected result. Moreover, we found an association between pneumococcal colonization and male gender; although no differences in the distribution of gender and age of the study participants were observed.

In 2010, Brazil introduced the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV10) as part of the childhood national immunization program; thus, this investigation was conducted in a scenario with high vaccine coverage [42]. As expected, despite the low number of strains of S. pneumoniae isolated, we observed that most serotypes were not contained in PCVs, except for serotypes 7F, 3, and 19A, as previously reported for IPD in elderly adults in Brazil [43]. Despite the low prevalence of H. influenzae in this study, all strains were NTHi, in line with the literature. After the introduction of Hib vaccination NTHi has become the most important type of H. influenzae not only in Brazil but also in several parts of the world [32,44]. Failure to receive influenza vaccine and to have COPD were risk factors associated with H. influenzae colonization, which may favor a higher occurrence of viral respiratory infections and thereby increase H. influenzae density in the nasopharynx of this population.

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the adult population as well as the potential risk factors and environmental factors associated with colonization also need to be considered when interpreting different findings on bacteria colonization between studies. We evaluated a very unique population that is generally not represented in colonization studies. The participants were elderly (mean age >80 years), approximately 60% being pre-frail or frail, most of them not living in a long-term institution, and showing a high rate of co-morbidities and antibiotic use over the last 12 months.

Limitations of our study should be mentioned. The ecological niches of the S. aureus strains are the anterior nares. We collected swabs from nasopharynx, which is not the primary niche for S. aureus. Even though we found a high rate of S. aureus colonization, the carrier rate in our study may still be underestimated. A multivariable logistic regression analysis would have been useful (where possible) to rule out possible confounding effects like the unbalanced distribution of age and sex. However, the number of isolates of S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae was too small, hampering accurate results in multivariable analysis due to the expected very wide confidence intervals. Another limitation would be that our study was restricted to the noninstitutionalized population (more than 98%), a fact that also contributed to the low MRSA carrier rate. In Brazil, traditionally the families take care of their elderly and institutionalization is still uncommon. In the State of São Paulo, about 0.8% of the elderly population resides in a long-term institution [45]. For MRSA strains, we only performed SCCmec typing which made it difficult to draw conclusions about the source of the acquisition (HA-MRSA or CA-MRSA lineages) of the isolates. Seventy percent of the participants were female, which can be considered as limitation of our study. We did not investigate oral samples (saliva or oropharyngeal), which could have improved S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae detection by qPCR as shown by others [46]. Different clinical specimens and diagnostic methods have been utilized for detection of S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae carriage among adult populations, making comparisons between studies difficult. Additional studies are of paramount importance to determine a better protocol for assessment of bacterial carriage in adults.

According to the Ministry of Health, in 2016, Brazil had the fifth largest elderly population worldwide. During 2012–2017, the Brazilian population aged ≥60 years grew by 18.8% [47]. Therefore, carriage studies involving elderly individuals are necessary for a better understanding of the colonization dynamics of S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and S. aureus, considering that colonization of the respiratory niche is the first step in disease development. In conclusion, we showed a high rate of S. aureus carriage compared with the low carriage rates for S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae in a well-attended population in a geriatric outpatient clinic. This is one of the few studies conducted in Brazil that could be used as the basis for future colonization studies in the elderly population.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Carriage patterns of the individuals colonized by Staphylococcus aureus or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221525.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Carrier status considering the subset of participants seen in both visit 1 and the follow-up visit (visit 2; n = 584).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221525.s002

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank to all elderly individuals who participated in this study. We also thank Carolina Sorgato Amorim, Juliana Failde, Franciele Fantinato, and Ana Paula Cassiolato for providing technical assistance. Roberto Dias for secretarial support.

References

  1. 1. Fung HB, Monteagudo-Chu MO. Community-acquired pneumonia in the elderly. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2010;8:47–62. pmid:20226392
  2. 2. Welte T, Torres A, Nathwani D. Clinical and economic burden of community-acquired pneumonia among adults in Europe. Thorax 2012;67:71–9. pmid:20729232
  3. 3. Metersky ML, Masterton RG, Lode H, File TM, Babinchak T. Epidemiology, microbiology, and treatment considerations for bacterial pneumonia complicating influenza. Int J Infect Dis. 2012;16:e321–31. pmid:22387143
  4. 4. Almeida ST, Nunes S, Paulo ACS, Faria NA, de Lencastre H, Sá-Leão R. Prevalence, risk factors, and epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carried by adults over 60 years of age. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;34:593–600. pmid:25359581
  5. 5. da Silveira M, da Cunha MLRS, de Souza CSM, Correa AAF, Fortaleza CMCB. Nasal colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among elderly living in nursing homes in Brazil: risk factors and molecular epidemiology. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2018;17:18. pmid:29728115
  6. 6. Coughtrie AL, Whiettaker RN, Begum N, Anderson R, Tuck A, Faust SN, et al. Evaluation of swabbing methods for estimating the prevalence of bacterial carriage in the upper respiratory tract: a cross sectional study. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e005341. pmid:25358677
  7. 7. Lewnard JA, Givon-Lavi N, Huppert A, Pettigrew MM, Regev-Yochay G, Dagan R, et al. Epidemiological Markers for Interactions Among Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Staphylococcus aureus in Upper Respiratory Tract Carriage. J Infect Dis. 2016;213:1596–605. pmid:26704617
  8. 8. Dunne EM, Murad C, Sudigdoadi S, Fadlyana E, Tarigan R, Indriyani SAK, et al. Carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Staphylococcus aureus in Indonesian children: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0195098. pmid:29649269
  9. 9. Flamaing J, Peetermans WE, Vandeven J, Verhaegen J. Pneumococcal Colonization in older persons in a nonoutbreak setting. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58:396–8. pmid:20370873
  10. 10. Greenberg D, Broides A, Blancovich I, Peled N, Givon-Lavi N, Dagan R. Relative Importance of Nasopharyngeal versus Oropharyngeal Sampling for Isolation of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae from Healthy and Sick Individuals Varies with Age. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:4604–9. pmid:15472316
  11. 11. Ministério da Saúde [Internet]. Brasil: Calendário Nacional de Imunização. (cited 2019 May 27).https://www.saude.gov.br/saude-de-a-z/vacinacao/calendario-vacinacao.
  12. 12. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–381.
  13. 13. Ensrud KE, Ewing SK, Taylor BC, Fink HA, Cawthon PM, Stone KL, et al. Comparison of 2 frailty indexes for prediction of falls, disability, fractures, and death in older women. Arch Intern Med. 2008;4:382–9.
  14. 14. Becker-Dreps S, Kistler CE, Ward K, Killeya-Jones LA, Better OM, Weber DJ, et al. Pneumococcal Carriage and Vaccine Coverage in Retirement Community Residents. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63:2094–8. pmid:26456473
  15. 15. O’Brien K, Nohynek H. Report from a WHO Working Group: standard method for detecting upper respiratory carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003;22:e1–11. pmid:12586987
  16. 16. CDC. Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention [Internet]. https://www.cdc.gov/streplab/pneumococcus/resources.html.
  17. 17. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. M100-27. 27th.
  18. 18. Wang X, Theodore MJ, Mair R, Trujillo-Lopez E, du Plessis M, Wolter N, et al. Clinical Validation of Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assays for Detection of Bacterial Meningitis Pathogens. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:702–8. pmid:22170919
  19. 19. Maaroufi Y, De Bruyne J-M, Heymans C, Crokaert F. Real-Time PCR for Determining Capsular Serotypes of Haemophilus influenzae. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:2305–8. pmid:17507524
  20. 20. Alarcon B, Vicedo B, Aznar R. PCR-based procedures for detection and quantification of Staphylococcus aureus and their application in food. J Appl Microbiol. 2006;100:352–64. pmid:16430512
  21. 21. Fosheim GE, Nicholson AC, Albrecht VS, Limbago BM. Multiplex real-time PCR assay for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and associated toxin genes. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:3071–3. pmid:21697325
  22. 22. Chiefari AK, Perry MJ, Kelly-Cirino C, Egan CT. Detection of Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin production genes from patient samples using an automated extraction platform and multiplex real-time PCR. Mol Cell Probes. 2015;29:461–7. pmid:26134133
  23. 23. McClure-Warnier JA, Conly JM, Zhang K. Multiplex PCR Assay for Typing of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome Mec Types I to V in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Vis Exp. 2013;79: e50779. pmid:24056633
  24. 24. Carvalho MGS, Tondella ML, McCaustland K, Weidlich L, McGee L, Mayer LW, et al. Evaluation and Improvement of Real-Time PCR Assays Targeting lytA, ply, and psaA Genes for Detection of Pneumococcal DNA. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:2460–6. pmid:17537936
  25. 25. Dunne EM, Murad C, Sudigdoadi S, Fadlyana E, Tarigan R, Indriyani SAK, et al. Carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Staphylococcus aureus in Indonesian children: A cross-sectional study. Hozbor DF, editor. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0195098. pmid:29649269
  26. 26. Lewnard JA, Givon-Lavi N, Huppert A, Pettigrew MM, Regev-Yochay G, Dagan R, et al. Epidemiological Markers for Interactions Among Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Staphylococcus aureus in Upper Respiratory Tract Carriage. J Infect Dis. 2016;213:1596–605. pmid:26704617
  27. 27. Nzenze SA, Shiri T, Nunes MC, Klugman KP, Kahn K, Twine R, et al. Temporal association of infant immunisation with pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on the ecology of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Staphylococcus aureus nasopharyngeal colonisation in a rural South African community. Vaccine. 2014;32(42):5520–30. pmid:25101982
  28. 28. Brito CS, Queiroz LL, de Campos PA, Batistão DW da F, Silva H de A, de Agostini GG, et al. The nares as a CA-MRSA reservoir in the healthy elderly. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2015;48:614–6. pmid:26516975
  29. 29. Munckhof WJ, Nimmo GR, Schooneveldt JM, Schlebusch S, Stephens AJ, Williams G, et al. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus, including community-associated methicillin-resistant strains, in Queensland adults. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;2:149–55. pmid:19154489
  30. 30. Andersen PS, Larsen LA, Fowler VG, Stegger M, Skov RL, Christensen K. Risk factors for Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in Danish middle-aged and elderly twins. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;32:1321–6. pmid:23657294
  31. 31. Gamblin J, Jefferies JM, Harris S, Ahmad N, Marsh P, Faust SN, et al. Nasal self-swabbing for estimating the prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus in the community. J Med Microbiol. 2013;62:437–40. pmid:23222858
  32. 32. Drayβ M, Claus H, Hubert K, Thiel K, Berger A, Sing A, et al. Asymptomatic carriage of Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Group A Streptococcus and Staphylococcus aureus among adults aged 65 years and older. PloS One. 2019;14(2):e0212052. https://doi.org/10.1371/jounal.pone.0212052. pmid:30735539
  33. 33. Scribel LV, Scribel MV, Bassani E, Barth AL, Zavascki AP. Lack of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage among patient at a primary-healthcare unit in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 2011;53:197–199.
  34. 34. Scerri J, Monecke S, Borg MA. Prevalence and characteristics of community carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Malta. J Epidemiol Glob Health 2013;3:165–73. pmid:23932059
  35. 35. Jiménez JN, Ocampo AM, Vanegas JM, Rodríguez EA, Garcés CG, Patiño LA et al. Characterization of virulence genes in methicillin susceptible and resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from a paediatric population in a university hospital of Medellín, Colombia. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2011, 106(8):980–985.
  36. 36. Liu C, Chen ZJ, Sun Z, Feng X, Zou M, Cao W et al. Molecular characteristics and virulence factors in methicillin-susceptible, resistant, and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus from central-southern China. J Micicrobiol Immunol Infect. 2015:48(5):490–6. pmid:24767415
  37. 37. Abdullahi O, Nyiro J, Lewa P, Slack M, Scott JAG. The Descriptive Epidemiology of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae Nasopharyngeal Carriage in Children and Adults in Kilifi District, Kenya. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008;27:59–64. pmid:18162940
  38. 38. Regev-Yochay G, Raz M, Dagan R, Porat N, Shainberg B, Pinco E, et al. Nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae by adults and children in community and family settings. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:632–9. pmid:14986245
  39. 39. Palmu AA, Kaijalainen T, Saureuskkoriipi A, Leinonen M, Kilpi TM. Nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae and pneumococcal urine antigen test in healthy elderly subjects. Scand J Infect Dis. 2012;44:433–8. pmid:22263905
  40. 40. Esposito S, Mari D, Bergamaschi L, Orenti A, Terranova L, Ruggiero L, et al. Pneumococcal colonization in older adults. Immun Ageing. 2016;13:2. pmid:26759599
  41. 41. Principi N, Iughetti L, Cappa M, Maffeis C, Chiarelli F, Bona G, et al. Streptococcus pneumoniae oropharyngeal colonization in school-age children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus: Impact of the heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016;12(2):293–300. pmid:26575615
  42. 42. Domingues CMAS, Verani JR, Montenegro Renoiner EI, de Cunto Brandileone MC, Flannery B, de Oliveira LH, et al. Effectiveness of ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine against invasive pneumococcal disease in Brazil: a matched case-control study. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2:464–71. pmid:24726406
  43. 43. Brandileone MCC, Almeida SCG, Minamisava R, Andrade AL. Distribution of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes before and 5 years after the introduction of 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in Brazil. Vaccine. 2018; 36(19):2559–2566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.010.
  44. 44. van Eldere J, Slack MP, Ladhani S, Cripps AW. Non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae, an under-recognized pathogen. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:1281–92.
  45. 45. Camarano AC. Cuidados de longa duração para a população idosa: um novo risco social a ser assumido? Rio de Janeiro: IPEA. 2010.
  46. 46. Milucky J, Carvalho M de G, Rouphael N, et al. Streptococcus pneumoniae colonization after introduction of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine for US adults 65 years of age and older, 2015–2016. Vaccine. 2019;(8):1094–1100.
  47. 47. Paradella R. Número de idosos cresce 18% em 5 anos e ultrapassa 30 milhões em 2017. IBGE [Internet]. 2018 Sep [cited 2019 Jun 10] https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/agencia-noticias/2012-agencia-de-noticias/noticias/20980-numero-de-idosos-cresce-18-em-5-anos-e-ultrapassa-30-milhoes-em-2017.