Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Epidemiology and Management of Cysticercosis and Taenia solium Taeniasis in Europe, Systematic Review 1990–2011

  • Lorenzo Zammarchi,

    Affiliation Infectious Disease Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence School of Medicine, Florence, Italy

  • Marianne Strohmeyer,

    Affiliation Infectious Disease Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence School of Medicine, Florence, Italy

  • Filippo Bartalesi,

    Affiliation SOD Malattie Infettive e Tropicali, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy

  • Elisa Bruno,

    Affiliation Department G.F. Ingrassia, Section of Neurosciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

  • José Muñoz,

    Affiliation Servicio de Medicina Tropical y Salud Internacional, Centre de Recerca en Salut Internacional de Barcelona, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

  • Dora Buonfrate,

    Affiliation Centre for Tropical Diseases, Sacro Cuore Hospital, Via Don Sempreboni, Negrar (Verona), Italy

  • Alessandra Nicoletti,

    Affiliation Department G.F. Ingrassia, Section of Neurosciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

  • Héctor Hugo García,

    Affiliation Cysticercosis Unit, Instituto de Ciencias Neurologicas, Department of Microbiology, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru

  • Edoardo Pozio,

    Affiliation Department of Infectious, Parasitic and Immunomediated Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy

  • Alessandro Bartoloni ,

    Affiliations Infectious Disease Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence School of Medicine, Florence, Italy, SOD Malattie Infettive e Tropicali, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy

  • The COHEMI Project Study Group

    Membership of the COHEMI Project Study Group is provided in the Acknowledgments


19 Dec 2013: Zammarchi L, Strohmeyer M, Bartalesi F, Bruno E, Muñoz J, et al. (2013) Correction: Epidemiology and Management of Cysticercosis and Taenia solium Taeniasis in Europe, Systematic Review 1990–2011. PLOS ONE 8(12): 10.1371/annotation/1bcc3e5b-1159-412b-be86-b18d94515cc2. View correction



Cysticercosis is caused by the invasion of human or pig tissues by the metacestode larval stage of Taenia solium. In Europe, the disease was endemic in the past but the autochthonous natural life cycle of the parasite is currently completed very rarely. Recently, imported cases have increased in parallel to the increased number of migrations and international travels. The lack of specific surveillance systems for cysticercosis leads to underestimation of the epidemiological and clinical impacts.


To review the available data on epidemiology and management of cysticercosis in Europe.


A review of literature on human cysticercosis and T. solium taeniasis in Europe published between 1990–2011 was conducted.


Out of 846 cysticercosis cases described in the literature, 522 cases were autochthonous and 324 cases were imported. The majority (70.1%) of the autochthonous cases were diagnosed in Portugal from 1983 and 1994. Imported cases of which 242 (74.7%) diagnosed in migrants and 57 (17.6%) in European travellers, showed an increasing trend. Most of imported cases were acquired in Latin America (69.8% of migrants and 44.0% of travellers). The majority of imported cases were diagnosed in Spain (47.5%), France (16.7%) and Italy (8.3%). One third of neurosurgical procedures were performed because the suspected diagnosis was cerebral neoplasm. Sixty eight autochthonous and 5 imported T. solium taeniasis cases were reported.


Cysticercosis remains a challenge for European care providers, since they are often poorly aware of this infection and have little familiarity in managing this disease. Cysticercosis should be included among mandatory reportable diseases, in order to improve the accuracy of epidemiological information. European health care providers might benefit from a transfer of knowledge from colleagues working in endemic areas and the development of shared diagnostic and therapeutic processes would have impact on the quality of the European health systems.

Key words: cysticercosis, neurocysticercosis, Taenia solium, taeniasis, Europe, travellers, migrants.


Cysticercosis is due to the invasion of human or pig tissues by the metacestode larval stage of Taenia solium [1], a helminth that may reach of up to 8 m in length in the adult stage. T. solium is a zoonotic cestode which has a complex two host life cycle [1]. Humans are the only definitive hosts, harbouring the adult tapeworm in the gut without having significant symptoms [2]. The adult tapeworm is acquired by eating raw or undercooked pork meat containing cysticerci [1]. Adult tapeworms have a life span of some years during which they produce millions of eggs which are intermittently released in the environment with the faeces [3][5]. Humans and pigs acquire cysticercosis ingesting T. solium eggs by the fecal-oral route [1]. After the ingestion, embryos contained in the eggs are released, cross the intestinal mucosa and are then transported by the circulatory system and dispersed throughout the body producing cysts mainly in the central nervous system (CNS) and in striated muscles [1]. Pigs are usually infected when reared in areas lacking adequate sanitary infrastructure where they can feed on human faeces [6].

Humans can acquire cysticercosis ingesting T. solium eggs released by themselves (autoinfestation) or by another tapeworm carrier living with them or involved in the preparation of food [7], [8]. In humans, the CNS is the most frequent localization of cysts which cause neurocysticercosis (NCC) [1]. NCC is considered to be the most common parasitic infection of the human nervous system and the most frequent preventable cause of epilepsy in the developing world [9] being responsible for about 30% of cases of epilepsy in low resources countries [10].

In several countries of Latin America, Africa and Asia, cysticercosis is highly endemic and linked to poverty, ignorance, lack of suitable diagnostic and management capacity and appropriate prevention and control strategies [9]. In these areas, cysticercosis leads to a very high economical burden related to losses in the meat industry for porcine cysticercosis, hospitalization costs for NCC and reduced productivity of people affected by NCC [2], [11], [12]. The situation is quite different in high resources countries such the United States and Europe. In the United States, cysticercosis has always been predominantly an imported disease and the number of observed cases increased from the 1970s onwards following the rise of immigration and the wide availability of the computerized tomography (CT) scan [13]. However in the period 1954–2005, 78 autochthonous cases have been reported in USA due to transmission from asymptomatic tapeworm carriers, who most likely acquired the infection abroad, to their household contacts [14].

In Europe, the disease was endemic in the past [15], but the natural life cycle of the parasite is currently completed very rarely thanks to the introduction of meat inspection, the progressive improvement of the pig husbandry, of the hygienic and socio-economic conditions and consumers education [15], [16]. Autochthonous cases of human and porcine cysticercosis are currently reported very rarely in Europe [17], [18], while human imported cases emerged in the last two decades only when immigration from low resource countries towards this continent became consistent [19]. In Europe, cysticercosis is not covered by specific surveillance systems. The epidemiology of the taeniasis/cysticercosis in high resources countries is probably changing, but the lack of reliable data is one of the major obstacles to understand the magnitude of the problem and the relevance of the disease is probably underestimated.

COHEMI (COordinating resources to assess and improve HEalth status of MIgrants from Latin America) is a three-year collaborative project supported by the European Commission under the Health Cooperation Work Programme of the 7th FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME (GA-261495) launched in 2011 ( The consortium brings together ten partners, six from Europe and four from Latin America (LA). One of the main objectives of the project is to provide a reliable estimate of the burden of selected Neglected Tropical Diseases in countries of origin and in different groups of migrants in Europe.

The aim of this study is to review, scientific and grey literature on the epidemiology and management of autochthonous and imported cases of cysticercosis and T. solium taeniasis in Europe.


A review of indexed and grey literature on cysticercosis and T. solium taeniasis observed in Europe and published during the period 1990–2011 (July) was conducted. The data analysis focused on incidence and prevalence in the general population or special group of subjects, age and sex, infection rates, major clinical aspects, and country of infection.

The investigation covered 45 European countries, namely Albania, Andorra, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxemburg, Macedonia, Malta, Monaco, Moldova, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, San Marino, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom and Vatican State.


The following search strategy was adopted in PubMed (, Embase (, The Cochrane Library ( (cysticerc* OR neurocysticerc* OR cisticerc* OR neurocisticerc* OR taenia* OR tenia* OR tapeworm) AND (Albania OR Andorra OR Austria OR Belarus OR Belgium OR Bosnia OR Herzegovina OR Bulgaria OR Cyprus OR Czech Republic OR Denmark OR Estonia OR Finland OR France OR Germany OR Greece OR Hungary OR Ireland OR Italy OR Latvia OR Lithuania OR Luxemburg OR Malta OR Monaco OR Moldova OR Netherlands OR Poland OR Portugal OR Romania OR San Marino OR Serbia OR Slovakia OR Slovenia OR Spain OR Sweden OR United Kingdom OR Ukraine OR Switzerland OR Norway OR Russia OR Croatia OR Montenegro OR Iceland OR Turkey OR Macedonia OR Vatican State OR Europe) AND (Humans[Mesh] AND (“1990/01/01”[PDAT] : “2011/07/31”[PDAT])). The search has been performed in August 2011. The online abstract book database of European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID, from 2000 to 2010 were also screened. Given the characteristics of the online abstract book database of ECCMID, it was queried using the following keywords “cysticercosis”, “neurocysticercosis” and “Taenia solium”. Moreover, additional published and unpublished studies from the authors were included together with data from the Ministry of Health (MoH) of the European authors’ countries (Spain and Italy) concerning the number of hospitalizations for cysticercosis in the national territories according to ICD9CM codes, since very few documents reported epidemiological data concerning cysticercosis/T. solium taeniasis in Europe.


The authors screened articles found by electronic search and evaluated their appropriateness based on title and abstract according to the established criteria. Exclusion criteria were: 1) studies concerning wrong agent (for example Taenia saginata or Echinococcus spp.); 2) reviews, letters or editorials without original data; 3) papers based on data only obtained through studies aiming to evaluate the performance of laboratory tests; 4) studies concerning animals only; 5) studies of European investigator outside the continent; 6) duplicated data; 7) articles with full texts written in languages other than that at least one of the members of the team could read and understand (namely English, French, Italian, German and Spanish). If the eligibility of the documents could not be ascertained according to the abstract and title only, the full text was analyzed to exclude or include the document. Moreover, in order to reduce possible underestimation of cysticercosis/T. solium taeniasis burden in some countries (mainly Eastern European countries), articles with an available English abstract, initially excluded due to the language of the full text, were selected as well.


Data from epidemiological studies were summarized, while data from case reports and case series were extracted using a standardized electronic form in which the main characteristics of study, clinical and epidemiological features of subjects with cysticercosis and/or T. solium taeniasis were recorded. The form included all the information needed to ascertain whether cases of cysticercosis and of T. solium satisfied the definition of definitive, probable or possible case (reported below). Concerning English abstracts of articles initially excluded due to language limits, only information contained in the abstract and referred to the number of cases reported and the most likely place of infection was extracted.

Cases of cysticercosis and T. solium taeniasis retrieved by the search were classified according to the following definitions:

  • Definitive or probable case of neurocysticercosis: according to the criteria shown in Table 1, which were proposed by Del Brutto [20]. A case confirmed through Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) on bioptic specimen was also considered definitive;
  • Definitive case of cysticercosis outside of CNS: case that was histologically confirmed by the presence of one or more cysticerci or PCR confirmed;
  • Possible case of cysticercosis or neurocysticercosis: case reported by the authors as “cases of neurocysticercosis or cysticercosis”, but not fulfilling the criteria of definitive or probable case (for example if sufficient data to classify the case as definitive or probable were not available);
  • Confirmed case of T. solium taeniasis: T. solium taeniasis case in which the diagnosis was based on the detection of gravid proglottids with information on the number of the uterine branches or case in which the diagnosis of Taenia spp. was done in a patient with cysticercosis or NCC;
  • Possible case of T. solium taeniasis: T. solium taeniasis case reported by the authors as “cases of T. solium taeniasis”, but not fulfilling the criteria of confirmed case;
  • Autochthonous case: case diagnosed in a subject without history of travel to or living in high endemic regions (Latin America, Asia or Africa). A case in which the subject travelled in Europe was considered autochthonous;
  • Imported case: case diagnosed in a subject with a history of travel or long stay in a endemic region (Latin America, Asia or Africa).
Table 1. Diagnostic criteria and degree of certainty for the diagnosis of neurocysticercosis according to Del Brutto et al. [20].


The flow diagram in Figure 1 shows the number of papers identified in each database and the review process. Out of 1967 screened documents, 166 were included: 40 on autochthonous cysticercosis [17], [21][58], 7 on both autochthonous and imported cysticercosis [19], [59][64], 16 on autochthonous T. solium taeniasis [65][80], 97 on imported cysticercosis [81][176], [Bartoloni A. unpublished], 4 on imported cysticercosis and T. solium taeniasis [7], [177][179], and 2 on hospitalization for cysticercosis in Spain and Italy [180], [181].

Figure 1. Flow diagram showing the number of papers identified in each database and the review process.

Legend: ECCMID = European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; MoH = Ministry of Health; COHEMI = COordinating resources to assess and improve HEalth status of MIgrants from Latin America.

Autochthonous Human Cysticercosis in Europe

Information on autochthonous cysticercosis originated from 47 papers [17], [19], [21][64]. According to a three year prospective study on the etiology of adult-onset epilepsy, carried out in Extremadura (Spain), 6.3% (5 of 80) of new cases of epilepsy were related to neurocysticercosis [57]. According to a seroprevalence study on 770 patients with epilepsy resident in Croatia, the seroprevalence was 1.5% using an ELISA test confirmed by an EITB (Enzyme-linked Immunoelectrotransfer Blot) [182]. The other studies were case reports or case series (Tables 2, 3, 4 and Figure S1).

Table 2. Selected studies reporting autochthonous and imported cases of cysticercosis in Europe (1990–2011 July).

Table 3. Main features of autochthonous and imported cases of cysticercosis in Europe (1990–2011 July).

Table 4. Autochthonous and imported cases of cysticercosis in Europe by country of diagnosis (1990–2011 July).

Autochthonous T. solium taeniasis in Europe

Only a confirmed case of T. solium taeniasis in a 25 years old Italian farmer, was documented [65]. In this case the authors explicitly specified that the diagnosis was based on observation of a several series of proglottids identified as T. solium. Forty-six cases of possible T. solium taeniasis were reported from Poland, with at least two cases per year in the period 1997–2008 [69][80], while no cases were reported in 2009 [68]. In Albania, from 1982 to 2002, 18 possible cases of T. solium were documented in 20 districts [67].The only available study on the prevalence of T. solium taeniasis was done in Szczecin Province (Poland) from 1994 to 1998. Only three T. solium taeniasis cases of 331 intestinal taeniasis, mainly due to T. saginata (n = 315), were documented. In this survey, prevalence of unspecified taeniasis decreased from 10.33/100,000 in 1994 to 3.52/100,000 in 1998 [66].

Imported Human Cysticercosis in Europe

There are only two studies on anti-cysticerci IgG in adopted children [172], [179].

In Florence (Central Italy), 1090 adopted children, with a mean age of 5±3.4 years, were tested for anti-cysticerci IgG by a commercial EITB kit from 2001 to 2010, and the overall seroprevalence was 1% (0.3%, 1.8%, 1.6%, 0% in Asian, Latin American, African and European adopted children respectively). Mean age of seropositive children was higher than that of seronegative children (8±3.7 vs 5±3.3; p = 0.045). All seropositive infants (n = 11) underwent a neuroimaging study (CT scan or magnetic resonance imaging, MRI). Three presented abnormal findings compatible with neurocysticercosis, but only one had symptoms (epilepsy). The symptomatic child was a Peruvian female presenting also T. solium tapeworm in stool [179].

In Negrar (Northern Italy), serum samples from 842 adopted children were tested to detect anti-T. solium IgG by a commercial Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) (91), or EITB (12) or both tests (739), from 2001 to 2008; of them, 87 sera tested positive at least by one test (76 sera, 9.0%, by ELISA; 12 sera, 1.6% by EITB). When both tests were used, positive results were discordant for all sera but one (1 ELISA+/EITB+; 64 ELISA+/EITB-; 11 ELISA+/EITB not done; 11 EITB+/ELISA-). All the 87 seropositive infants underwent a cerebral MRI. Eight (4 EITB+/ELISA-, 2 ELISA+/EITB not done, 2 ELISA+/EITB-) showed abnormal findings which were compatible with NCC, but only three had symptoms (epilepsy). The two children with ELISA+/EITB- sera showed a single enhancing lesion and a lesion compatible with a gliotic scar by MRI. The seroprevalence of anti-T. solium IgG in sera of Asian, Latin American, African and European adopted children was 10.0%, 7.6%, 5.2%, 10.7% by ELISA and 1.7%, 0.0%, 2.6%, 0.0% by EITB, respectively [172].

Out of 108 studies, 324 cases of imported cysticercosis were described [7], [19], [59][64], [81][170], [172], [174][179], [Bartoloni A., unpublished]; of them, 242 (74.7%) were migrants, 57 (17.6%) travellers, while no information was available for 25 cases (7.7%). Eleven (44.0%) travellers acquired the infection in Latin America, 10 (40.0%) in Asia (5 of whom in India), and 4 (16.0%) in Africa. The information was not available for 24 travellers or they had visited two or more endemic regions. Among migrants, 12 (5.1%) lived in more than one country before settling in Europe, therefore, it was not possible to know where they become infected. The majority of migrants (157; 69.8%) were Latin American (including 86 from Ecuador, 18 from Peru, and 17 from Bolivia), while the others were equally distributed between Africa (34, 15.1%, including 11 from Capo Verde and 6 from Madagascar), and Asia (34, 15.1%, including 18 from India). The time elapsed between the last exposure in an endemic country and the onset of symptoms was reported for 158 subjects. Among them, 33 (22.9%) developed symptoms within one year from the last exposure, 106 (73.6%) between 2 and 5 years, 11 (7.6%) between 6 and 10 years and 8 (5.6%) after 11 or more years (Table 2, 3, 4 and Figure S1). The majority of imported cases of cysticercosis were diagnosed in Spain (47.5%), France (16.7%), Italy (8.3%) and United Kingdom (7.4%). Seventy to 80% of imported cases in Spain and Italy were diagnosed after 2000 while 80 to 90% of imported cases in France and the United Kingdom were diagnosed before 2000.

Imported T. solium taeniasis in Europe

Only five confirmed cases of T. solium taeniasis were documented in patients with cysticercosis. An African migrant died due to a disseminated cysticercosis following the ingestion of an adult T. solium tapeworm, a procedure suggested by an African healer to treat abdominal pain and nausea. Two mature segments of T. solium were recovered from faeces of this person [7]. The second case was a Latin American person with NCC in which the diagnosis was done through observation of gravid proglottids [177]. In the other three cases of T. solium taeniasis reported in the literature, the parasitological details of diagnosis were not specified but all were diagnosed in persons with NCC. Two cases were reported in migrants of unknown origin [178] and one in a Peruvian child [179].

Hospitalization for Cysticercosis in Italy and Spain

According to the Italian MoH, the number of hospitalizations for cysticercosis ranged between 40 and 53 per year in the period 2001–2010 [181]. The number of hospitalizations for migrants showed an increasing temporal trend while a decreasing trend was observed for Italians. From 2006 ongoing, the number of migrants hospitalized for cysticercosis has exceeded that of Italians. Using the number of hospitalizations by citizenship and by year as numerator and the number of residents in Italy by citizenship and by year as denominator [183], it was possible to estimate the hospitalization rate by 100,000 subjects in different groups. Considering the period 2001–2010, the higher mean hospitalization rate has been found in citizens from Latin America (5.9/100,000) and Asia (1.64/100,000), especially in Ecuadorian, Bolivian, Indian and Peruvian people (Table 5). According to the Spanish MoH from 2001 to 2009, the number of hospitalizations for suspected cases of cysticercosis ranged from 75 to 95 per year [180].

Table 5. Hospitalization for cysticercosis in Italy, 2001–2010 [181], [183].


The results of our findings, about epidemiology of T. solium taeniasis and cysticercosis in Europe, update those previously published by Overbosch et al. [184] and supplement those recently published by Del Brutto focusing on the epidemiology of NCC in Western Europe [185]. With respect to the latter review, our systematic research strategy included also grey literature and data from Eastern European countries, it was not limited to the CNS involvement, and focussed also on T. solium taeniasis. Moreover, data on the diagnostic and therapeutic management of the reported cases were also recorded.

Autochthonous cases of cysticercosis most of which were diagnosed in persons from the Mediterranean region (Iberian Peninsula, Italy and Balkans), are decreasing. In fact, most of these cases (366, 70.1%) were reported in Portugal from 1983 to 1994 [34], [64]. Persons who acquired cysticercosis in Europe were older than those who acquired cysticercosis abroad, and were more frequently asymptomatic, often presenting brain calcifications (the end-stage inactive lesion of cysticercosis) and without taeniasis. These clinical data suggest that these people acquired the infection in a remote past.

Our literature investigation does not allow to know whether the T. solium cycle is still active in Europe. Since T. solium taeniasis is acquired by eating insufficiently cooked pig meat with cysticerci, the presence in the European regions of porcine cysticercosis is the “condition sine qua non” to acquire T. solium taeniasis in Europe. The importation of cysticercus-infected pork can be excluded due to the veterinary controls, through meat inspection performed at slaughterhouse, and the circulation of cysticercus-infected pigs exists only in small and poor areas of the world where pigs are used only for local consumption and which do not trade at the international level.

Our search retrieved 68 cases of T. solium taeniasis in native European persons, the large majority of which (67.6%) have been reported from Poland. At the diagnosis, T. solium taeniasis may be confused with the very common T. saginata which is circulating with a 0.01–2% prevalence in Western Europe and with a higher prevalence in Eastern Europe [186]. By morphology, T. solium and T. saginata eggs are indistinguishable between them and the two Taeniidae species can be distinguished only by the count of the uterine branches in the proglottids or by the scolex which, however, is very rarely detectable [187]. Specific faecal antigen detection or PCR method are not yet performed in clinical practice and, to our knowledge, were never used for an epidemiological study in Europe.

To date in Western Europe, intensive indoor pig productions largely predominate. However, the increasing trend to produce organic pork from free-ranging pigs could increase the risk of T. solium transmission [188], and could represent a reason of concern for the control of cysticercosis in Europe. In 2007, a survey of the European Food Safety Authority, among European Union countries members, showed that porcine cysticercosis was still diagnosed in five countries (Austria, Estonia, Lithuania, Poland and Romania), no cases of porcine cysticercosis were reported in 9 countries (Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal and the United Kingdom), whereas no information was available for the other 11 EU countries [18]. This survey suggests that T. solium taeniasis is still circulating in Europe; however, these data should be carefully interpreted because porcine cysticercosis due to the larval stage of Taenia hydatigena can be misdiagnosed with the infection caused by larvae of T. solium. The absence of porcine cysticercosis recently reported in Portugal [18], where an hotspot of cysticercosis transmission was observed up to early nineties [34], suggests the possible interruption of transmission due to the modification of breeding conditions adopted in the recent years. Autochthonous cases of cysticercosis in Europe could also originate from T. solium carriers (migrant or traveller) who acquired taeniasis outside Europe as observed in the United States [8], [14]. In our search, we found only 5 cases of T. solium immigrant carriers. Consequently, we can speculate that the risk of spreading cysticercosis in Europe from an asymptomatic tapeworm carriers coming from abroad is quite low even if it cannot be excluded.

The larval stage of Taenia crassiceps, Taenia multiceps and Taenia serialis infecting canids as final host and rodents, rabbits, sheep and goats as intermediate host can sporadically affect humans in Europe. In some cases, neither pathological examination nor serology can differentiate these parasites from T. solium cysticerci [50]. Therefore, we cannot exclude that a portion of cases diagnosed as cysticercosis in Europe has been caused by other species of cestodes.

In Europe, the increasing number of migrants from low resource countries (74.7% of cysticercosis imported cases) and international travellers (17.6% of imported cases) resulted in an increase of cysticercosis. Most of imported cases originated from Latin America, where 44.0% of affected travellers and 69.8% of affected migrants acquired the infection. Most of individuals with imported disease developed symptoms after 2 to 5 years after migration. This finding is quite similar to that obtained in the classic epidemiological studies carried out in the sixties in English soldiers returning from India [189], confirming that the incubation period of cysticercosis, even if largely variable, is usually between 2 to 5 years.

The European countries where cysticercosis cases are more often imported are those with larger immigration such as Spain, France, Italy and the United Kingdom. Spain is the country reporting the highest number of imported cases of cysticercosis, probably because it hosts the largest number of Latin American migrants in Europe.

Considering both autochthonous and imported cases, neurologists, infectious disease specialists, neurosurgeons, laboratory specialists (microbiologists, parasitologists, pathologists), paediatrics and radiologists were the most often involved persons in the management of people with cysticercosis in Europe. This wide range of specialists confirms the need of knowledge in different settings to manage cysticercosis. NCC is certainly the parasite localization which is managed with more difficulties since there is not a gold standard test for the diagnosis but only diagnostic criteria and no treatment of choice but only recommendation to tailor the therapy case by case [190].

From the clinical point of view, NCC does not shows any pathognomonic signs or symptoms. On the contrary, it may present with nearly all neurological signs or symptoms [191], [192]. Neuroradiological images are pathognomonic only in few cases when the scolex is visible in the cyst (named “cyst with dot” image) [20]. Serological tests didn’t help too much. Several serological assays to detect specific antibodies have been used for decades with different and somewhat conflicting results [193], [194]. Currently, most centres use an EITB with purified glycoprotein antigens [195], which can be performed on serum samples or on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or use an ELISAs. The EITB sensitivity in serum samples is equal to or better than that in CSF samples [196]. Although EITB has 100% specificity and a sensitivity of 98% in patients with two or more cerebral lesions, up to 50% of patients with a single brain lesion or with only calcified parasites may test negative [197][199]. The main problem related to ELISA on serum is the poor specificity which is reported around 70% or less [194]. In any case, serological results must be carefully interpreted together with the other diagnostic criteria. So far, EITB positivity on serum is considered to be a major diagnostic criterion and ELISA positivity on CSF a minor diagnostic criterion [20]. Recently, a serum antigen detecting ELISA has been reported to have an acceptable sensitivity (83–100%) and specificity (84–96%) and proposed as an adjunctive tool for the diagnosing NCC [200].

The diagnostic delay can be huge. In one person, NCC was misdiagnosed with migraine, cluster headache, and viral meningitis for 29 years after the onset of symptoms [111]. Parenchymal NCC can be misdiagnosed with brain tumour and lead to avoidable surgery as in the two cases reported by Bouillot [163]. About one third of neurosurgical operations reported in the examined literature, were probably avoidable since the indication to surgery was not among that are commonly accepted [201]. In autochthonous and imported cases of cysticercosis, 41.4% and 32.6% of operations, respectively, were performed for suspected CNS neoplasm. This high rate of neurosurgical interventions can be attributed to the low awareness and experience in management of the disease and the inadequacy of preoperative diagnostic tools [43].

According to Ruiz [154], 22.8% (8 of 35) of persons received albendazole in spite of not having antiparasitic treatment indication. Finally, it should be stressed that the treatment of NCC cannot be limited to surgery and/or antiparasitic drugs. The symptomatic therapy including anti-inflammatory drugs (corticosteroids), analgesics, adequate antiepileptic treatment as for other secondary epilepsies, represents the main measure in the management of NCC, however, these important treatment issues are rarely discussed in case reports [202].

Conclusions: in Europe we are currently observing the overlapping of two epidemiological pictures of cysticercosis/T. solium taeniasis: the autochthonous and the imported infections. Autochthonous cases are disappearing, while imported cases are rising as a consequence of travels and migrations. Given the lack of systematic epidemiological data collection and disease reporting, the magnitude of the phenomenon cannot be delineated. Moreover, it is unclear if cases of imported T. solium taeniasis are now generating autochthonous cases of cysticercosis but, according to our search, it is probably a limited problem. In order to get more information, policy makers should consider to include cysticercosis among mandatory reportable diseases. From the clinical point of view, NCC remains a challenge for clinicians despite their full access to all the available tools for diagnosis and management of the disease. The currently available diagnostic tests and treatment options are frequently insufficient and research activities in this field are strongly needed. Within a perspective of a south-north and north-south cooperation, European health care providers might benefit from a transfer of knowledge from expert colleagues working in endemic areas and the development of shared diagnostic process and therapeutic decisions would have impact on the European health systems quality.

Supporting Information

Figure S1. Maps showing the geographical distribution by country of diagnosis of autochthonous and imported cases of cysticercosis reported in Europe (1990–2011 July).



Authors thank the COHEMI project study group that includes: Maurizio Bonati, Chiara Pandolfini, Francesca Severino, Valeria Confalonieri, Gianni Tognoni, Zeno Bisoffi, Dora Buonfrate, Andrea Angheben, Marco Albonico, Alessandro Bartoloni, Marianne Strohmeyer, Lorenzo Zammarchi, Filippo Bartalesi, Jose Muñoz, Ana Requena-Mendez, Maria Roura, Laia Ventura, Robert Pool, Christopher Pell, Anita Hardon, Peter Chiodini, Juan Moreira, Mariella Anselmi, Roberto Sempértegui, Eduardo Gotuzzo, Maria Alejandra Mena, Carola Liendo, Héctor H. Garcia, Javier Bustos, Saul Santivañez, Faustino Torrico, Daniel Lozano, Teresa Hinojosa Cabrera, Javier Ochoa Morón, Ignacio Abapori Cuellar, Jaime Amorós Suarez, Guido Chumiray Rojas, Alessandra Nicoletti, Elisa Bruno.

Authors thank Doctor Giorgio Zavarise for providing assistance with data collection at the “Dipartimento di Pediatria, Ospedale Sacro Cuore, Negrar, Verona, Italy”; Doctor Francesco Bevere (Ministero della Salute, Direttore Generale della Programmazione Sanitaria, Roma Italy) and Engineer Pietro Granella (Ministero della Salute Dipartimento della Qualità, Direzione Generale Programmazione Sanitaria, Specialista del settore Statistico Informatico, Roma, Italy) for providing data on hospitalization for cysticercosis/taeniasis in Italy (ICD9CM classification); mister Marco Miranda, who kindly assisted with the preparation and proof-reading of the manuscript.

Héctor Hugo García is supported by a Wellcome Trust International Senior Research Fellowhip in Tropical Medicine and Public Health.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: LZ MS FB EB JM DB AN HHG AB. Performed the experiments: LZ MS AB EP HHG. Analyzed the data: LZ MS AB EP HHG. Wrote the paper: LZ MS HHG EP AB.


  1. 1. Garcia HH, Del Brutto OH (2000) Taenia solium cysticercosis. Infect Dis Clin North Am 14: 97–119, ix.
  2. 2. Pawlowski Z, Allan J, Sarti E (2005) Control of Taenia solium taeniasis/cysticercosis: from research towards implementation. Int J Parasitol 35: 1221–1232.
  3. 3. Allan JC, Velasquez-Tohom M, Garcia-Noval J, Torres-Alvarez R, Yurrita P, et al. (1996) Epidemiology of intestinal taeniasis in four, rural, Guatemalan communities. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 90: 157–165.
  4. 4. Allan JC, Velasquez-Tohom M, Torres-Alvarez R, Yurrita P, Garcia-Noval J (1996) Field trial of the coproantigen-based diagnosis of Taenia solium taeniasis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Am J Trop Med Hyg 54: 352–356.
  5. 5. Garcia HH, Gilman RH, Gonzalez AE, Verastegui M, Rodriguez S, et al. (2003) Hyperendemic human and porcine Taenia solium infection in Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg 68: 268–275.
  6. 6. Carpio A (2002) Neurocysticercosis: an update. Lancet Infect Dis 2: 751–762.
  7. 7. Bourke GJ, Petana WB (1994) Human Taenia cysticercosis: a bizarre mode of transmission. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 88: 680.
  8. 8. Schantz PM, Moore AC, Munoz JL, Hartman BJ, Schaefer JA, et al. (1992) Neurocysticercosis in an Orthodox Jewish community in New York City. N Engl J Med 327: 692–695.
  9. 9. Willingham AL, 3rd, Engels D (2006) Control of Taenia solium cysticercosis/taeniosis. Adv Parasitol 61: 509–566.
  10. 10. Ndimubanzi PC, Carabin H, Budke CM, Nguyen H, Qian YJ, et al. (2010) A systematic review of the frequency of neurocyticercosis with a focus on people with epilepsy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4: e870.
  11. 11. Torgerson PR, Macpherson CN (2011) The socioeconomic burden of parasitic zoonoses: global trends. Vet Parasitol 182: 79–95.
  12. 12. Rajkotia Y, Lescano AG, Gilman RH, Cornejo C, Garcia HH (2007) Economic burden of neurocysticercosis: results from Peru. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 101: 840–846.
  13. 13. Shandera WX, Schantz PM, White Jr AC (2002) Taenia solium Cysticercosis: the special case of United States. In: Singh G, Prabhakar S, editors. Taenia Solium Cysticercosis: From Basic to Clinical Science. UK: CABI Pub. 139–144.
  14. 14. Sorvillo F, Wilkins P, Shafir S, Eberhard M (2011) Public health implications of cysticercosis acquired in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis 17: 1–6.
  15. 15. Hinz E (1991) Current status of food-borne parasitic zoonoses in West Germany. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 22 Suppl: 78–84
  16. 16. Pozio E (2008) Epidemiology and control prospects of foodborne parasitic zoonoses in the European Union. Parassitologia 50: 17–24.
  17. 17. Bruschi F, Giangaspero F, Castagna M, Becherini F, Filice ME, et al. (2006) Neurocysticercosis: surgical treatment of an autochthonous case in a non-endemic region. Pathologica 98: 229–231.
  18. 18. Dorny P, Vallée I, Alban L, Boes J, Boireau P, et al.. (2010) Scientific Report submitted to EFSA. Development of harmonised schemes for the monitoring and reporting of Cysticercus in animals and foodstuffs in the European Union. European Food Safety Authority.
  19. 19. Esquivel A, Diaz-Otero F, Gimenez-Roldan S (2005) Growing frequency of neurocysticercosis in Madrid (Spain). Neurologia 20: 116–120.
  20. 20. Del Brutto OH, Rajshekhar V, White AC Jr, Tsang VC, Nash TE, et al. (2001) Proposed diagnostic criteria for neurocysticercosis. Neurology 57: 177–183.
  21. 21. Palasis S, Drevelengas A (1991) Extramedullary spinal cysticercosis. Eur J Radiol 12: 216–218.
  22. 22. Schmidt U, Klauss V, Stefani FH (1990) [Unilateral iritis by cysticercal larva in the anterior chamber]. Ophthalmologica 200: 210–215.
  23. 23. Sandt G, Beissel L, Roilgen A (1990) [Cysticercosis of the 4th ventricle]. Bull Soc Sci Med Grand Duche Luxemb 127: 45–49.
  24. 24. Mancuso P, Chiaramonte I, Tropea R (1991) Neurocysticercosis treated with praziquantel. Long-term follow-up of a case. J Neurosurg Sci 35: 157–160.
  25. 25. Jimenez-Jimenez FJ, Molina-Arjona JA, Roldan-Montaud A, Agulla A, Santos J, et al. (1992) Blepharospasm associated with neurocysticercosis. Acta Neurol (Napoli) 14: 56–59.
  26. 26. Fandino J, Botana C, Fandino C, Rodriguez D, Gomez-Bueno J (1991) Clinical and radiographic response of fourth ventricle cysticercosis to praziquantel therapy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 111: 135–137.
  27. 27. Isidro-Llorens A, Dachs F, Vidal J, Sarrias M (1993) Spinal cysticercosis. Case report and review. Paraplegia 31: 128–130.
  28. 28. Saporiti A, Brocchieri A, Grignani G (1994) [Neurocysticercosis and epilepsy. Description of a clinical case]. Minerva Med 85: 403–407.
  29. 29. Bauer TM, Bruhwiler J, Aschwanden M, Wagner S, Schwander J (1994) [Neurocysticercosis]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 119: 175–179.
  30. 30. Waldvogel F, Korner F, Terrier F (1994) [Muscle ache and vision disorders in a South American immigrant to Switzerland]. Praxis (Bern 1994) 83: 1413–1417.
  31. 31. Roos G, Henze T, Gullotta F, Oehler U, Dreyhaupt T (1995) [Neurocysticercosis]. Pathologe 16: 348–353.
  32. 32. La Mantia L, Costa A, Eoli M, Savoiardo M (1995) Racemose neurocysticercosis after chronic meningitis: effect of medical treatment. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 97: 50–54.
  33. 33. Maddalena G, Nozzoli C, Passarella B (1995) Neurocysticercosis treated with albendazole long term follow-up of a case. J Neurosurg Sci 39: 171–175.
  34. 34. Monteiro L, Nunes B, Mendonca D, Lopes J (1995) Spectrum of epilepsy in neurocysticercosis: a long-term follow-up of 143 patients. Acta Neurol Scand 92: 33–40.
  35. 35. Corral I, Quereda C, Moreno A, Lopez-Velez R, Martinez-San-Millan J, et al. (1996) Intramedullary cysticercosis cured with drug treatment. A case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21: 2284–2287.
  36. 36. Wiegand F, Koeppen S, Haussermann P, Delcker A (1999) [Neurocysticercosis. Current review of the literature based on a long-term study of 2 clinically distinct German cases]. Nervenarzt 70: 298–305.
  37. 37. Castellanos F, Montes I, Porras LF, Peragallo E, Ampuero J, et al. (2000) [Giant subarachnoid cysts due to neurocysticercosis: two cases reported fro a rural area in Extremadura]. Rev Neurol 30: 433–435.
  38. 38. Sabel M, Neuen-Jacob E, Vogt C, Weber F (2001) Intracerebral neurocysticercosis mimicking glioblastoma multiforme: a rare differential diagnosis in Central Europe. Neuroradiology 43: 227–230.
  39. 39. Finsterer J, Kladosek A, Lubec D, Auer H (2001) Bilateral thalamic stroke due to neurocysticercosis in a non-endemic area. Cerebrovasc Dis 11: 354–356.
  40. 40. Ogilvie CM, Kasten P, Rovinsky D, Workman KL, Johnston JO (2001) Cysticercosis of the triceps–an unusual pseudotumor: case report and review. Clin Orthop Relat Res: 217–221.
  41. 41. Carangelo B, Erra S, Del Basso De Caro ML, Bucciero A, Vizioli L, et al. (2001) Neurocysticercosis. Case report. J Neurosurg Sci 45: 43–46.
  42. 42. Puzzanghera R, Ferrigno P, Ferrai MR, Murgia SB (2001) Seizure disorder mimicking an acute confusional state as clinical presentation of neurocysticercosis: neuroimaging, EEG findings and clinical correlations. Neurol Sci 22: 321–324.
  43. 43. Talan-Hranilovic J, Sajko T, Negovetic L, Lupret V, Kalousek M (2002) Cerebral cysticercosis and echinococcosis: a preoperative diagnostic dilemma. Arch Med Res 33: 590–594.
  44. 44. Grasland A, Galeazzi G, Pouchot J, Mortier E, Vinceneux P (2002) [Moving meningitis]. Rev Med Interne 23 Suppl 2250s–252s.
  45. 45. Iglesias Gozalo MJ, Rabanaque Hernandez MJ, Gomez Lopez LI (2002) [Tuberculosis in the Zaragoza province. Estimation by means of the capture-recapture method]. Rev Clin Esp 202: 249–254.
  46. 46. Rodriguez-Sanchez G, Castellanos-Pinedo F, Gimenez-Pando J, Adeva-Bartolome MT, Zancada-Diaz F (2002) [Hydrocepahlia and subarachnoid cyst due to neurocysticercosis. A new case from rural Extremadura]. Rev Neurol 34: 348–351.
  47. 47. Anton Martinez J, Gonzalez Blanco P, Gutierrez Sampedro N (2002) [The neurocysticercosis is not only an imported illness]. Med Clin (Barc) 118: 77.
  48. 48. Turkulov V, Samardzija Madle N, Canak G, Vukadinov J, Ivetic V, et al.. (2002) Electroencephalographic findings in cerebral cysticercosis patients 12th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Milan, Italy.
  49. 49. Wraige E, Graham J, Robb SA, Jan W (2003) Neurocysticercosis masquerading as a cerebral infarct. J Child Neurol 18: 298–300.
  50. 50. Duong TH, Monegierdu Sorbier C, Bailly ER, Guillou-Garnier MF, Fetissof F, et al. (2006) [Cysticercosis contracted in metropolitan France]. Presse Med 35: 243–245.
  51. 51. Ergen FB, Turkbey B, Kerimoglu U, Karaman K, Yorganc K, et al. (2005) Solitary cysticercosis in the intermuscular area of the thigh: a rare and unusual pseudotumor with characteristic imaging findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29: 260–263.
  52. 52. Titlic M, Tonkic A, Jukic I, Lahman-Doric M, Kolic K, et al. (2007) Neurocysticercosis–non-specific clinical and neuroradiological presentation. Bratisl Lek Listy 108: 414–416.
  53. 53. Paterakis KN, Kapsalaki E, Hadjigeorgiou GM, Barbanis S, Fezoulidis I, et al.. (2007) Primary spinal intradural extramedullary cysticercosis. Surg Neurol 68: 309–311; discussion 312.
  54. 54. Nikolic S, Stevanovic G, Peric V (2007) Clinical forms of neurocysticercosis – Our experience.. 17th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Munich, Germany.
  55. 55. Malzacher VD, Bogumil-Schott E, Neu IS (1994) [Intraspinal manifestation of cysticercosis–Cysticercus racemosus. A case report and review of the literature]. Nervenarzt 65: 563–567.
  56. 56. Papageorgiou SG, Kolovou D, Bonakis A, Kontaxis T, Moulopoulou A, et al. (2009) Concommitant appearance of glioblastoma multiforme and neurocysticercosis in a nonendemic country: a case report. Neurologist 15: 293–295.
  57. 57. Jimenez Jimenez FJ, Molina Arjona JA, Zancada F, Santos J, Roldan Montaud A, et al. (1990) [Etiology of late-onset epilepsy. A prospective study in an area of rural health care]. Med Clin (Barc) 94: 521–524.
  58. 58. Waloch M, Sobolewska A, Dzbenski TH (2010) [Evaluation of epidemiological situation of cestode infections in Poland in the years 1997–2006 on the basis of data from san-epid stations]. Przegl Epidemiol 64: 533–536.
  59. 59. Dietrichs E, Tyssvang T, Aanonsen NO, Bakke SJ (1993) Cerebral cysticercosis in Norway. Acta Neurol Scand 88: 296–298.
  60. 60. Aksiks I, Sverzickis R (2007) Neuronavigation guided surgery for parenchymal neurocysticercosis in two patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 149: 1169–1172; discussion 1172.
  61. 61. Ensenat J, Martinez-Manas R, Horcajada JP, De Juan C, Ferrer E (2007) [Diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties in neurocysticercosis: presentation of 6 cases and review of the literature]. Neurocirugia (Astur) 18: 101–110.
  62. 62. Rodríguez Guardado A, Gómez E, Rodríguez Pérez M (2007) Cysticercosis: correlation between serological and radiological diagnosis. 17th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 2007, Munich, Germany.
  63. 63. Terraza S, Pujol T, Gascon J, Corachan M (2001) [Neurocysticercosis: an imported disease?]. Med Clin (Barc) 116: 261–263.
  64. 64. Morgado C, Gomes LB, de Campos JG (1994) [Neurocysticercosis. An imaging analysis of 35 cases]. Acta Med Port 7: 269–275.
  65. 65. Minciullo PL, Spagnolo EV, Cascio A, Cardia G, Gangemi S (2009) Fatal anaphylactic shock and Taenia solium infestation: a possible link? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 103: 449–450.
  66. 66. Krol-Pakulska E, Pakulski C, Szmid J (2000) Evaluation of taeniasis prevalence in the area supervised by the Provincial Sanitary-Epidemiological Unit in Szczecin between 1994 and 1998. Med Sci Monit 6: 746–750.
  67. 67. Kraja D, Tila B, Como N (2003) The efficacy of niclosamide, mebendazole and praziquantel on 50 cases with Taenia saginata taeniasis and Taenia solium taeniasis. 13th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Glasgow, UK.
  68. 68. Waloch M (2011) [Cestode infections in Poland in 2009]. Przegl Epidemiol 65: 285–288.
  69. 69. Waloch M (2010) [Cestode infections in Poland in 2008]. Przegl Epidemiol 64: 261–264.
  70. 70. Waloch M (2009) [Cestode infections in Poland in 2007]. Przegl Epidemiol 63: 267–269.
  71. 71. Waloch M (2008) [Cestode infections in Poland in 2006]. Przegl Epidemiol 62: 351–355.
  72. 72. Waloch M (2007) [Cestode infections in Poland in 2005]. Przegl Epidemiol 61: 305–309.
  73. 73. Waloch M (2006) [Cestode infections in Poland in 2004]. Przegl Epidemiol 60: 509–513.
  74. 74. Waloch M (2004) [Cestode infections in Poland in 2002]. Przegl Epidemiol 58: 165–169.
  75. 75. Waloch M (2003) [Cestode infections in Poland in 2001]. Przegl Epidemiol 57: 159–163.
  76. 76. Plonka W, Waloch M (2002) [Cestode infections in Poland in 2000]. Przegl Epidemiol 56: 357–361.
  77. 77. Plonka W (2001) [Cestode infections in Poland in 1999]. Przegl Epidemiol 55: 159–163.
  78. 78. Plonka W (1999) [Cestode infections in 1997]. Przegl Epidemiol 53: 159–165.
  79. 79. Plonka W (2000) [Cestode infections in 1998]. Przegl Epidemiol 54: 181–187.
  80. 80. Waloch M (2005) [Cestode infections in Poland in 2003]. Przegl Epidemiol 59: 331–335.
  81. 81. Berche M, Hayot B, Mokrane M, Najjar G, Bouzas E (1990) [Ocular cysticercosis, typical forms and treatment]. Ophtalmologie 4: 377–379.
  82. 82. Hoffman P, Saint-Paul MC, Michiels JF, Loubiere R, Minet ML, et al. (1990) [Isolated involvement of the central nervous system in cysticercosis. Anatomo-clinical study of a case]. Ann Pathol 10: 122–125.
  83. 83. Gimenez-Roldan S, Chinchilla N, De Andres C, Gil Nunez A (1990) [Neurocysticercosis among Latin American emigrants]. Rev Clin Esp 186: 197.
  84. 84. Luger MH, Stilma JS, Ringens PJ, van Baarlen J (1991) In-toto removal of a subretinal Cysticercus cellulosae by pars plana vitrectomy. Br J Ophthalmol 75: 561–563.
  85. 85. Allcut DA, Coulthard A (1991) Neurocysticercosis: regression of a fourth ventricular cyst with praziquantel. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 54: 461–462.
  86. 86. Chong MS, Hawkins CP, Cook GC, Hawkes CH, Kocen RS (1991) A resistant case of neurocystercercosis. Postgrad Med J 67: 577–578.
  87. 87. Heap BJ (1991) False-positive tuberculostearic acid tests in cysticercosis. Lancet 337: 498–499.
  88. 88. Boecher-Schwarz HG, Hey O, Higer HP, Perneczky A (1991) Intrasellar cysticercosis mimicking a pituitary adenoma. Br J Neurosurg 5: 405–407.
  89. 89. Hansen NJ, Hagelskjaer LH, Christensen T (1992) Neurocysticercosis: a short review and presentation of a Scandinavian case. Scand J Infect Dis 24: 255–262.
  90. 90. Bills DC, Symon L (1992) Cysticercosis producing various neurological presentations in a patient: case report. Br J Neurosurg 6: 365–369.
  91. 91. Rowedder A, Schafroth E, Schlup P (1993) [Grand-mal epilepsy as initial manifestation of a parenchymal neuro_cysticercosis]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 123: 125–129.
  92. 92. Gauthier N, Sangla S, Stroh-Marcy A, Payen L (1995) [Neurocysticercosis disclosed by cerebrovascular complication]. J Radiol 76: 119–123.
  93. 93. Bialasiewicz AA, Janssen K, Wienhues M, Balmes R (1995) [Subretinal manifestations as the chief findings in parasitic diseases in germany]. Ophthalmologe 92: 737–740.
  94. 94. Vantomme M, Swartenbroekx R, Dhaen B, Peetermans W, Plets C, et al. (1995) Neurocysticercosis: a poorly understood disease. Acta Neurol Belg 95: 23–28.
  95. 95. Domenici R, Matteucci L, Meossi C, Stefani G, Frugoli G (1995) [Neurocysticercosis: a rare cause of convulsive crises]. Pediatr Med Chir 17: 577–581.
  96. 96. Debat-Zoguereh D, Delmont J, Brouqui P, Haddad D, Bourgeade A (1996) Photo quiz. Clin Infect Dis 22: 423, 563.
  97. 97. Whitefield L, Crowston JG, Davey C (1996) Cavernous sinus syndrome associated with neurocysticercosis. Eye (Lond) 10 (Pt 5): 642–643.
  98. 98. Dumas JL, Visy JM, Belin C, Gaston A, Goldlust D, et al. (1997) Parenchymal neurocysticercosis: follow-up and staging by MRI. Neuroradiology 39: 12–18.
  99. 99. Manzano-Blanco S, Gutierrez-Solana LG, Garcia-Penas JJ, Garcia-Guzman P, Ruiz-Falco ML (1997) [A case of mixed (parenchymatous meningo-basal) neurocysticercosis]. Rev Neurol 25: 1585–1588.
  100. 100. Aghakhani N, Comoy J, Tadie M, Lacroix C, Bouree P (1998) [Isolated intramedullary cysticercosis. Case report]. Neurochirurgie 44: 127–131.
  101. 101. Fernandez-Gomez JM, Garcia-Garmendia JL, Lopez-Dominguez JM, Casado-Chocan JL (1998) [Neurocysticercosis and convulsive crises]. Rev Neurol 26: 1072–1073.
  102. 102. Lerch E, Gossi B, Henzen C (1998) [“Epilepsia peruviana”]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 128: 1559.
  103. 103. Cudlip SA, Wilkins PR, Marsh HT (1998) Endoscopic removal of a third ventricular cysticercal cyst. Br J Neurosurg 12: 452–454.
  104. 104. Al-Khodairy AT, Annoni JM, Uebelhart D (1999) Parenchymatous cerebral neurocysticercosis in a quadriplegic patient. Spinal Cord 37: 142–146.
  105. 105. Barba G, Doireau V, Lippa A, Tauzin C, Mensire A, et al. (1999) [Radiologic case of the month. Neurocysticercosis]. Arch Pediatr 6: 315–316.
  106. 106. Chatel G, Gulletta M, Scolari C, Bombana E, El-Hamad I, et al. (1999) Neurocysticercosis in an Italian traveler to Latin America. Am J Trop Med Hyg 60: 255–256.
  107. 107. Cheillan D, Bancel J, Tiliket C, Savet J, Caudie C, et al. (1999) [A surprising aglycorrachia! A case of neurocysticercosis]. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 57: 356–359.
  108. 108. Schriever S, Hasenfratz G, Hintschich C, Landau K (1999) [Enlargement of an extraocular eye muscle: a symptom of cysticercosis]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 215: 321–324.
  109. 109. Meri T, Jokiranta TS, Granat S, Collander F, Valtonen M, et al. (1999) Diagnosis of atypical neurocysticercosis by polymerase chain reaction analysis: case report. Clin Infect Dis 28: 1331–1332.
  110. 110. Reparon C, Jansen J, Bruck W, Verheggen R, Zimmerer B (1999) A case of neurocysticercosis-differential diagnostic aspects. Funct Neurol 14: 37–41.
  111. 111. Djientcheu VD, Zona G, Rilliet B (2000) Neurocysticercosis: migration and proliferation of cysticercus in a CSF valve. Br J Neurosurg 14: 135–137.
  112. 112. Wabbels B, Kruse F, Helmke B, Rohrschneider K, Volcker HE (2000) [Painless orbital swelling after sojourn in tropics. Cysticercosis and other parasitic eye diseases]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 217: 109–113.
  113. 113. Wadley JP, Shakir RA, Rice Edwards JM (2000) Experience with neurocysticercosis in the UK: correct diagnosis and neurosurgical management of the small enhancing brain lesion. Br J Neurosurg 14: 211–218.
  114. 114. Ponnighaus JM, Nkhosa P, Baum HP (2001) [Cutaneous manifestation of cysticercosis]. Hautarzt 52: 1098–1100.
  115. 115. Bergui M, Zhong J, Bradac GB, Sales S (2001) Diffusion-weighted images of intracranial cyst-like lesions. Neuroradiology 43: 824–829.
  116. 116. Cicalini S, Escriba D, Francavilla R, De Rosa FG (2001) Neurocysticercosis: an unusual presentation of a rare disease. J Neurol 248: 139–140.
  117. 117. Guigon B, Trepsat C (2002) [Intraocular cysticercosis: a difficult diagnosis]. J Fr Ophtalmol 25: 78–80.
  118. 118. Vandenbos F, Boscagli-Melaine A, Roth S, Mondain-Miton V, Paquis P, et al. (2002) [Delayed diagnosis of neurocysticercosis: two case reports]. Rev Med Interne 23: 386–389.
  119. 119. Roth S, Pulcini C, Vandenbos F, Bernard E, Delaunay P, et al. (2002) [A case of lymphocytic meningitis revealing a neurocysticercosis]. Rev Med Interne 23: 402–403.
  120. 120. Choksey MS, Hamid NA (2002) Neurocysticercosis in UK. Br J Neurosurg 16: 80.
  121. 121. Roth B, Gocht A, Metternich FU (2003) [Cysticercosis as a rare cause of a tumor of the tongue]. Laryngorhinootologie 82: 564–567.
  122. 122. Croft AM, Flores AA, Lopez HZ (2007) Cysticercosis in a female Nicaraguan traveler. J Travel Med 14: 349–351.
  123. 123. Guerra del Barrio E, Lopez Roger R (2007) [Intracerebral cystic lesion in an immigrant patient]. Rev Clin Esp 207: 301–302.
  124. 124. Ramos JM, Masia M, Padilla S, Bernal E, Martin-Hidalgo A, et al. (2007) Fatal infection due to larval cysts of cestodes (neurocysticercosis and hydatid disease) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected patients in Spain: report of two cases. Scand J Infect Dis 39: 719–723.
  125. 125. Sandes AR, Mouzinho A, Valente P (2007) Orbital cysticercosis: diagnosis and treatment controversies. Pediatr Infect Dis J 26: 180–181.
  126. 126. Berrueco Moreno R, Martin Ibanez I, Martinez Roig A, Vollmer Torrubiano I (2007) [Focal convulsion in an 8-year-old boy]. An Pediatr (Barc) 66: 637–638.
  127. 127. Jay A, Dhanda J, Chiodini PL, Woodrow CJ, Farthing PM, et al. (2007) Oral cysticercosis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45: 331–334.
  128. 128. Sierra Bergua B, Navarro Calzada J, Sanjoaquin Conde I, Santos Lasaosa S (2007) [Generalized tonic-clonic seizure in immigrant]. Neurologia 22: 253–255.
  129. 129. Coulibaly B, Gautier G, Fuentes S, Ranque S, Bouvier C (2008) [Degenerating neurocysticercosis cysts: differential diagnosis with cerebral metastasis]. Rev Neurol (Paris) 164: 948–952.
  130. 130. Vera de Pedro E, Vereas Martinez A, Pilar Orive J, Lopez Fernandez Y, Morteruel Arizkuren E (2008) [Intracranial hypertension secondary to neurocysticercosis]. An Pediatr (Barc) 68: 530–532.
  131. 131. Lopez IC, Bermejo PG, Espiga PJ, Tapia DQ (2008) [L-dopa sensitive Parkinsonism in neurocysticercosis]. Neurologia 23: 119–121.
  132. 132. Armestar F, Lorencio C, Mesalles E, Marcos P, de la Torre M (2008) [Coma secondary to neurocysticercosis: a study of 4 cases]. Rev Clin Esp 208: 474–475.
  133. 133. Llompart Pou JA, Gene A, Ayestaran JI, Saus C (2005) Neurocysticercosis presenting as sudden death. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147: 785–786; discussion 786.
  134. 134. Jimenez Caballero PE, Mollejo Villanueva M, Marsal Alonso C, Alvarez Tejerina A (2005) [Bruns’ syndrome: description of a case of neurocysticercosis with pathological study]. Neurologia 20: 86–89.
  135. 135. Castillo-Iglesias H, Mouly S, Ducros A, Sarfati C, Sulahian A, et al. (2006) Late-onset eosinophilic chronic meningitis occurring 30 years after Taenia solium infestation in a white Caucasian woman. J Infect 53: e35–38.
  136. 136. Chianura L, Sberna M, Moioli C, Villa MR, Orcese C, et al. (2006) Neurocysticercosis and human immunodeficiency virus infection: a case report. J Travel Med 13: 376–380.
  137. 137. Finsterer J, Li M, Rasmkogeler K, Auer H (2006) Chronic long-standing headache due to neurocysticercosis. Headache 46: 523–524.
  138. 138. Hoare M, Gelson WT, Antoun N, Alexander GJ (2006) Early recurrence of neurocysticercosis after orthotopic liver transplant. Liver Transpl 12: 490–491.
  139. 139. Klotz P, Tappe D, Abele-Horn M, Warmuth-Metz M, Sorensen N, et al. (2006) Cerebral mass in a 13-year-old girl following long-term sojourn in the Tropics. J Med Microbiol 55: 345–347.
  140. 140. Mas-Sese G, Vives-Pinera I, Fernandez-Barreiro A, Martinez-Lage JF, Martinez-Salcedo E, et al. (2008) [A descriptive study of neurocysticercosis in a tertiary care hospital]. Rev Neurol 46: 194–196.
  141. 141. Poeschl P, Janzen A, Schuierer G, Winkler J, Bogdahn U, et al. (2006) Calcified neurocysticercosis lesions trigger symptomatic inflammation during antiparasitic therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27: 653–655.
  142. 142. Costa CU, von Einsiedel HG, Disko R, Berthele A (2006) Multicystic tumor in the fourth ventricle: consider neurocysticercosis. J Neurol 253: 1092–1093.
  143. 143. Bouree P, Dumazedier D, Bisaro F, Resende P, Comoy J, et al. (2006) Spinal cord cysticercosis: a case report. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 36: 727–736.
  144. 144. Barra Valencia V, Moreno Elola-Olaso A, Fundora Suarez Y, Meneu Diaz JC, Jimenez de los Galanes SF, et al. (2007) Second case of neurocysticercosis in a patient with liver transplantation (first case in Spain): a case report. Transplant Proc 39: 2454–2457.
  145. 145. Cazejust J, Saliou G, Ducreux D (2008) [Neurocysticercosis discovered during work-up for first convulsion]. Presse Med 37: 424–425.
  146. 146. Holzapfel BM, Schaeffeler C, Banke IJ, Waldt S (2010) A 37-year-old man with a painless growing mass of the thorax. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468: 1193–1198.
  147. 147. Navarro Gonzalez D, Huarte I, Santesteban R, Bidarte M, Ayechu A (2009) [Clinical and radiological diagnosis of neurocysticercosis: a case report]. An Sist Sanit Navar 32: 269–273.
  148. 148. Avellon Liano H, Vazquez Lopez M, Garzo Fernandez MC, Ruiz Martin Y, de Castro PC (2009) [Solitary cysticercus brain lesion: a diagnostic dilemma]. An Pediatr (Barc) 70: 602–604.
  149. 149. Cianfoni A, Cina A, Pravata E, Della Marca G, Vollono C, et al. (2009) Neurocysticercosis: still life in the brain. Arch Neurol 66: 1290–1291.
  150. 150. Gonzalez-Valcarcel J, Fernandez-Ruiz LC, Aparicio Hernandez M, Alonso Canovas A, Masjuan Vallejo J (2009) [Regression of cystic lesion of IV ventricle after medical treatment]. Rev Clin Esp 209: 99–101.
  151. 151. Lillie P, McGann H (2010) Empiric albendazole therapy and new onset seizures–a cautionary note. J Infect 60: 403–404; author reply 404–405.
  152. 152. Tappe D, Demmer P, Echterhoff U, Weskamp R (2010) Two cases of presumably travel-related subcutaneous cysticercosis. Infection 38: 152–153.
  153. 153. Soriano Perez MJ, Salas Coronas J, Cabezas Fernandez MT, Vazquez Villegas J (2010) [Neurocysticercosis and Chagas disease]. Med Clin (Barc) 134: 425.
  154. 154. Ruiz S, Garcia-Vazquez E, Picazo R, Hernandez A, Herrero JA, et al. (2011) [Neurocysticercosis in Murcia (Spain)]. Rev Clin Esp 211: 133–138.
  155. 155. Raffaldi I, Scolfaro C, Mignone F, Aguzzi S, Denegri F, et al. (2011) An uncommon cause of seizures in children living in developed countries: neurocysticercosis–a case report. Ital J Pediatr 37: 9.
  156. 156. Giordani MT, Binazzi R, Tamarozzi F, Brunetti E (2011) Neurocysticercosis in Italy. 21th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Milan Italy.
  157. 157. Browne IM, Birnbach DJ (2003) Neurocysticercosis: a new differential in the diagnosis of postdural puncture headache. Anesth Analg 97: 580–582, table of contents.
  158. 158. Canizares R, Roig P, Esparcia A, Zorraquino A, Ortiz de la Tabla V, et al. (2003) [Convulsive symptoms in a young patient]. Rev Clin Esp 203: 601–603.
  159. 159. Roca C, Gascon J, Font B, Pujol T, Valls ME, et al. (2003) Neurocysticercosis and population movements: analysis of 23 imported cases in Spain. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 22: 382–384.
  160. 160. Sabbatani S, Fasulo G, Chiodo F (2003) [Brain cysticercosis: review and case report]. Infez Med 11: 175–182.
  161. 161. Dura Trave T, Yoldi Petri ME, Bernaola Iturbe E, Hernandez Lagunas T (2003) [Neurocysticercosis: an imported cause of acquired epilepsy]. An Pediatr (Barc) 59: 504–506.
  162. 162. Rao KR, Lessing D (2003) Neurocysticercosis in West London. Arch Dis Child 88: 471.
  163. 163. Bouillot S, Monteil P, Dautheribes M, Rougier A, Guerin J, et al. (2003) [Two cases of neurocysticercosis mimicking brain tumor]. Ann Pathol 23: 355–357.
  164. 164. Epelboin L, Klement E, Chemali N, Danis M, Bricaire E, et al. (2004) [Neurocysticercosis complicating the treatment of cutaneous cysticercosis in a traveller]. Bull Soc Pathol Exot 97: 250–252.
  165. 165. Ortega-Herrera R, Fernandez-Segura ME, Gomez de Travecedo YCI (2004) [Ecuadorian immigrant with headache]. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 22: 248–249.
  166. 166. Smith D, Ng V, Bonar M, Merry C, Bergin C, et al. (2004) Neurocysticercosis: a rare cause of seizure. Ir Med J 97: 284–285.
  167. 167. Verraes-Derancourt S, Foudrinier F, Durlach A, Bernard P (2004) [Cutaneous nodules]. Ann Dermatol Venereol 131: 495–497.
  168. 168. Alvarez Rodriguez E, Torres-Garate R, Gutierrez Larrainzar A, Cabello J, Espinos Perez D (2004) [Neurocysticercosis: report of three cases and recommendations of treatment]. An Med Interna 21: 382–386.
  169. 169. Egberts JH, van der Horst C, Bannowsky A, Junemann KP, Braun PM (2004) [Micturition dysfunction triggered by spinal intramedullary neurocysticercosis]. Aktuelle Urol 35: 58–61.
  170. 170. Canas NM, Calado SL, Vale J (2005) [Treatment of racemose neurocysticercosis of the spine]. Rev Neurol 40: 544–547.
  171. 171. Hortobagyi T, Alhakim A, Biedrzycki O, Djurovic V, Rawal J, et al. (2009) Cysticercosis of the fourth ventricle causing sudden death: a case report and review of the literature. Pathol Oncol Res 15: 143–146.
  172. 172. Indino A (2009) Neurocisticercosi in età pediatrica: descrizione di casi clinici in pazienti adottati provenienti da regioni endemiche. Postgraduate School of Paediatrics Thesis. Italy: University of Ferrara.
  173. 173. van der Meer P, Quant-Duran C (2004) [Diagnostic image (174). A Nicaraguan man with an epileptic seizure. Neurocysticercosis]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 148: 221.
  174. 174. Meszaros I, Doczi T, Gomori E (2003) [Current aspects in neurocysticercosis]. Orv Hetil 144: 1731–1734.
  175. 175. Brouwer RE, Thijssen H, van der Meer JW, Overbosch D (1995) [2 patients with neurocysticercosis]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 139: 2736–2738.
  176. 176. Vanista J, Lapkova E, Uhlikova M (1993) [Cysticercosis in the Czech Republic]. Cesk Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol 42: 187–189.
  177. 177. Perez-Lopez C, Isla-Guerrero A, Alvarez F, Budke M, Fernandez-Miranda JC, et al. (2003) [Update in neurocysticercosis treatment]. Rev Neurol 36: 805–811.
  178. 178. Rousseau MC, Guillotel B, Delmont J (1999) [Neurocysticercosis in the South-East of France 1988–1998]. Presse Med 28: 2141–2144.
  179. 179. Zammarchi L, Veneruso G, Strohmeyer M, Mantella A, Bartalesi F, et al. (2011) Taenia solium seroprevalence in immigrant and foreign adopted children in Florence, Italy. Poster Presentations of the 7th European Congress on Tropical Medicine and International 3–6 October 2011 Barcelona, Spain Abstract N° 13–167 published in Tropical Medicine and International Health 16: 218.
  180. 180. Ministerio de Sanidad Política Social e Igualdad. Instituto de Información Sanitaria (2011) Registro de altas – CMBD. Spain.
  181. 181. Ministero della Salute Dipartimento della Qualità Direzione Generale Programmazione Sanitaria (2011) Dati estratti dalla banca dati delle schede di dimissione ospedaliera anni 2001–2010 per il progetto COHEMI. DGPROG 1.9.b/3. Italy.
  182. 182. Mestrovic T, Sviben M, Vilibic-Cavlek T, Ljubin-Sternak S, Tabain I, et al. (2012) Seroprevalence of Taenia solium infections in Croatian patients presenting with epilepsy. J Helminthol 86: 259–262.
  183. 183. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (2011) Cittadini stranieri. Bilancio Demografico e popolazione residente straniera al 31 dicembre per sesso e cittadinanza.
  184. 184. Overbosch D, Oosterhuis JW, Kortbeek LM, Garcia-Albea E (2002) Neurocysticercosis in Europe. In: Craig P, Pawlowski Z, editors. Cestode Zoonoses: Echinococcosis and Cysticercosis An emergent and global problem. Amsterdam: IOS press. NATO Science Series 33–40.
  185. 185. Del Brutto OH (2012) Neurocysticercosis in Western Europe: a re-emerging disease? Acta Neurol Belg 112: 335–343.
  186. 186. Hotez PJ, Gurwith M (2011) Europe’s neglected infections of poverty. Int J Infect Dis 15: e611–619.
  187. 187. Guezala MC, Rodriguez S, Zamora H, Garcia HH, Gonzalez AE, et al. (2009) Development of a species-specific coproantigen ELISA for human Taenia solium taeniasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 81: 433–437.
  188. 188. Pugliese C, Sirtori F (2012) Quality of meat and meat products produced from southern European pig breeds. Meat Sci 90: 511–518.
  189. 189. Dixon HB, Lipscomb FM (1961) Cysticercosis: an analysis and follow-up of 450 cases. London: Medical Research Council.
  190. 190. Garcia HH, Del Brutto OH (2005) Neurocysticercosis: updated concepts about an old disease. Lancet Neurol 4: 653–661.
  191. 191. Sinha S, Sharma BS (2009) Neurocysticercosis: a review of current status and management. J Clin Neurosci 16: 867–876.
  192. 192. Martinez MA, Martinez MM, Padilla C, Saavedra H, Alvarado M, et al.. (1999) Clinical aspects and unsolved questions in neurocysticercosis. In: Garcia HH, Martinez Mendoza SM, editors. Taenia solium taeniasis/Cysticercosis. Lima: Editorial Universo. 161.
  193. 193. Arambulo PV, 3rd, Walls KW, Bullock S, Kagan IG (1978) Serodiagnosis of human cysticercosis by microplate enzyme-linked immunospecific assay (ELISA). Acta Trop 35: 63–67.
  194. 194. Ramos-Kuri M, Montoya RM, Padilla A, Govezensky T, Diaz ML, et al. (1992) Immunodiagnosis of neurocysticercosis. Disappointing performance of serology (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) in an unbiased sample of neurological patients. Arch Neurol 49: 633–636.
  195. 195. Tsang VC, Brand JA, Boyer AE (1989) An enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot assay and glycoprotein antigens for diagnosing human cysticercosis (Taenia solium). J Infect Dis 159: 50–59.
  196. 196. Garcia HH, Martinez M, Gilman R, Herrera G, Tsang VC, et al. (1991) Diagnosis of cysticercosis in endemic regions. The Cysticercosis Working Group in Peru. Lancet 338: 549–551.
  197. 197. Rajshekhar V, Oommen A (1997) Serological studies using ELISA and EITB in patients with solitary cysticercus granuloma and seizures. Neurological Infections and Epidemology 2: 177–180.
  198. 198. Furrows Sj Fau - McCroddan J, McCroddan J Fau - Bligh WJ, Bligh Wj Fau - Chiodini P, Chiodini P Lack of specificity of a single positive 50-kDa band in the electroimmunotransfer blot (EITB) assay for cysticercosis.
  199. 199. Garcia Hh Fau - Gilman RH, Gilman Rh Fau - Catacora M, Catacora M Fau - Verastegui M, Verastegui M Fau - Gonzalez AE, Gonzalez Ae Fau - Tsang VC, et al. Serologic evolution of neurocysticercosis patients after antiparasitic therapy. Cysticercosis Working Group in Peru. Lack of specificity of a single positive 50-kDa band in the electroimmunotransfer blot (EITB) assay for cysticercosis.
  200. 200. Gabriel S, Blocher J, Dorny P, Abatih EN, Schmutzhard E, et al. (2012) Added value of antigen ELISA in the diagnosis of neurocysticercosis in resource poor settings. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6: e1851.
  201. 201. Garcia HH, Evans CA, Nash TE, Takayanagui OM, White AC Jr, et al. (2002) Current consensus guidelines for treatment of neurocysticercosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 15: 747–756.
  202. 202. Garcia HH, Gonzalez AE, Gilman RH (2011) Cysticercosis of the central nervous system: how should it be managed? Curr Opin Infect Dis 24: 423–427.
  203. 203. Monteiro L, Coelho T, Stocker A (1992) Neurocysticercosis–a review of 231 cases. Infection 20: 61–65.