Figures
Abstract
Abruption and retention, two types of abnormal placental separation, are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Though advancements in obstetric management have improved peripartum injury, patients who experience abnormal placental separation may be at risk for long-term complications. This study evaluates long-term maternal mortality in patients with abruption or retention compared to those with normal placental separation. In our cohort of 638,911 vaginal deliveries (625,890 normal, 5,435 abruption, 7,586 retention), the mortality rate was 6.4 per 1,000 in normal deliveries, 9.8 per 1,000 in abruption, and 12.0 per 1,000 in retention. When controlling for demographic factors (age, race, social determinants of health), placental retention was associated with a 95% increased mortality risk (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.59–2.40, p < 0.001) and placental abruption with a 59% increased risk (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.21–2.08, p < 0.001). After excluding deaths within 42 days, the association with retention remained significant (HR 1.93, p < 0.001) while abruption lost significance (HR 1.31, p = 0.089), suggesting abruption-associated mortality may be driven by acute complications. Piecewise Cox regression confirmed these temporal patterns, with retention showing persistently elevated risk across all follow-up periods. A variety of health outcomes were associated with either abruption, retention or in both abnormal placental separation groups. More research is needed to understand the mechanisms associated with abnormal placental separation and contributors to long-term mortality.
Citation: Jasani S, Demiray A, Stevenson J, Krawiec C (2026) A comparison of long-term maternal mortality associated with pathologic placental separation: Highlighting possible trends and mechanisms. PLoS One 21(4): e0338586. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0338586
Editor: Melvin Marzan, University of Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Received: December 15, 2025; Accepted: April 6, 2026; Published: April 24, 2026
Copyright: © 2026 Jasani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The data underlying this study were accessed through the TriNetX global federated research network (https://trinetx.com), a third-party commercial platform that provides access to de-identified electronic health record data from participating healthcare organizations. The authors accessed these data under an institutional license governed by a data use agreement with TriNetX. Because the data are proprietary and subject to contractual licensing restrictions, the authors are legally prohibited from publicly sharing, redistributing, or depositing the data in a public repository. The authors did not receive any special access privileges beyond those available to authorized TriNetX users. This study was reviewed by the Penn State Human Subjects Protection Office and determined to not meet the definition of human subject research (Study ID: STUDY00020794). Qualified researchers may request access to TriNetX data by contacting TriNetX directly (email: join@trinetx.com), subject to approval, execution of a data use agreement, and any applicable fees. Inquiries regarding data access or ethical oversight may also be directed to the Penn State Office for Research Protections, Human Research Protection Program (phone: 814-865-1775; email: irb-orp@psu.edu; website: research.psu.edu/irb).
Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Two primary complications of placental separation are abruption and retention. Placental abruption involves the complete or partial separation of a normally implanted placenta before delivery. Placental retention happens when the placenta does not fully separate within 30–60 minutes after birth. Both conditions pose significant risks. Abruption can lead to severe complications such as hemorrhage, need for transfusions, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC), renal failure, and even mortality [1–5]. Similarly, placental retention can result in hemorrhage, invasive procedures, endomyometritis and mortality [6–8].
While advancements in obstetric care have significantly reduced placental separation associated mortality [3,9–11], individuals with placental separation complications may still be at risk for long-term health issues. Research indicates that these two conditions can heighten the risk of cardiovascular, neurological and oncological problems [12–14]. Specifically, patients who experience abruption have an elevated long-term risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases [1,12,15–21], while those who experience placental retention accompanied by hemorrhage face increased risks of cardiovascular disease and cancer [13]. These findings highlight the need for ongoing monitoring and preventative care for individuals who have experienced these complications, emphasizing the importance of early recognition and intervention to mitigate long-term health risks.
The reasons behind these associations remain unclear [22–25]. While biological factors likely play a role, the clinical approach to post-delivery management of patients who experience abnormal placental separation may also contribute. The absence of standardized protocols for postpartum follow-up may lead to missed or delayed diagnoses and/or treatment, disproportionately affecting some populations. This uncertainty is also complicated by limited mechanistic understanding of the etiology and outcomes of placental dysfunction. The tendency to examine abnormal placental separation into their separate clinical diagnoses, abruption or retention, may impede the identification of molecular pathways that underly placental dysfunction perinatally and beyond. Placental dysfunction can include conditions such as abruption, preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction or preterm delivery and are associated with long-term cardiovascular diseases [25,26]. Maternal vascular malperfusion has been found in all these conditions [26] and may be one etiologic component of placental dysfunction. Though retained placenta is not traditionally categorized under placental dysfunction, similarities such as maternal vascular malperfusion [27,28] and associated long-term outcomes [13,14] suggests mechanistic similarities. Categorizing abruption and retention under the broader concept of abnormal placental separation may improve our understanding of the pathogenesis and inform both acute and long-term care strategies.
The primary objective of this study is to compare long-term mortality in patients with pathologic placental separation in an index delivery. We hypothesize that patients with either type of abnormal placental separation, abruption or retention, will have a higher risk of long-term mortality as compared to normally separating placentas. We chose to focus on a clear outcome such as mortality as this is clinically significant and accurately represented in electronic health records (EHR). The secondary objective of this study is to analyze associations between abruption and retention with health outcomes to further elucidate potential disease mechanisms and risk factors.
Materials and methods
Study design
A retrospective observational case control cohort study was conducted using the TriNetX EHR database of all women who delivered vaginally between the ages of 15–54 with a reported inpatient encounter. TriNetX is a global federal health research network that provides researchers access to continuously updated data elements from participating health care organizations, predominantly in the United States. TriNetX is certified to the ISO 27001:2013 standard and protects healthcare data by maintaining compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) Security Rule. The EHR data elements are aggregated, de-identified, and include demographic characteristics, diagnoses, procedures, medications, laboratory values and genomics, all in compliance with the de-identification standard outlined in Section 164.51(a) of the HIPPA privacy rule. As no protected health information is received by the user, we were provided a waiver from the Penn State Health Institutional Review Board to perform this study (STUDY00020794). Study design, conduct and result reporting were constructed using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.
Data collection
The dataset was generated and downloaded on 23/02/2024. All deliveries were identified in TriNetX on April 5, 2024, using related common procedural terminology (CPT) codes for vaginal deliveries and cesarean section (N = 1,483,438). The earliest delivery date was identified for all patients and used to determine mode of delivery (i.e., vaginal or cesarean section). Deliveries complicated by abnormal placental separation were identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnostic codes for placental abruption and retained placenta. Placental abruption was defined using ICD-9-CM codes 641.2x and ICD-10-CM codes O45.x, while retained placenta was defined using ICD-9-CM codes 667.0x–667.1x and ICD-10-CM codes O72.0–O72.2 (full code lists provided in S1 Table). Dates for placental separation ICD codes were identified in order to ensure that placental separation status co-occurred with the identified delivery for each patient. Placental separation ICD codes 6 weeks before delivery and up to 6 weeks after delivery were used to assign a delivery to a placental outcome group. Deliveries that did not have co-occurring placental separation ICD codes were excluded in the primary analysis but were retained for the purposes of sensitivity analysis for mortality. Patients without any ICD codes for placental separation were assigned to the normal delivery group.
We then extracted the earliest and latest encounter dates for each patient. Patients with less than 30 days of follow-up, with records indicating both abruption and retention, and those delivered by cesarean section were excluded to ensure mutually exclusive groupings and to control for the possible impact of delivery mode on maternal morbidity and mortality. The final dataset comprised of 638,911 patients after applying these inclusion and exclusion criteria. We then obtained the following data: age, race, ethnicity, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classification- related maternal morbidity diagnoses, CPT codes, healthcare common procedure coding system (HCPS) codes, and relevant health outcomes using ICD codes [29,30]. In order to control for possible differences in medical record data entry, we excluded deliveries prior to January 1, 2008, as EHR use prior to 2008 was inconsistent (Fig 1). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality following the index delivery. We examined mortality across the full follow-up period as well as within specific time windows to distinguish short-term from long-term mortality patterns.
Statistical analysis
Categorical variables, including demographic factors and health conditions, were summarized as counts and percentages. Comparisons between groups were performed using the Chi-square test. Continuous variables, such as maternal year of birth and follow-up duration, were summarized as means and standard deviations. Since continuous variables were not normally distributed (assessed visually via histograms and confirmed by Shapiro-Wilk tests), comparisons across groups were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, a non-parametric method appropriate for non-normally distributed data.
Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between placental outcomes and subsequent mortality. The hazard ratio presents the relative risk of death at any given time point, comparing the exposed group (abruption or retention) to the reference group (normal delivery). We employed a directed acyclic graph (DAG)-informed approach to covariate selection, distinguishing between true confounders and potential mediators or colliders. Our primary adjusted model controlled for demographic confounders: maternal age at delivery, race, and social determinants of health (SDOH) indicator. SDOH were defined using ICD-10-CM–based indicators available within the TriNetX platform and were analyzed as binary variables indicating the presence or absence of documented social risk indicators. We deliberately avoided adjusting for health conditions that could be consequences of abnormal placental separation or acute delivery complications such as DIC, hemorrhage. A secondary model additionally adjusted for pre-existing conditions (diabetes, hypertension, obesity, chronic kidney disease) to assess the robustness of associations when accounting for baseline health status.
To understand the temporal pattern of mortality risk, we conducted multiple complementary analyses (Table 2): (1) Primary analysis: Full follow-up period with all 4,154 deaths included to provide overall mortality risk estimates. (2) Short-term mortality: Follow-up censored at 365 days, capturing only the 933 deaths occurring within the first year after delivery. (3) Excluding acute postpartum deaths: Patients who died within 42 days of delivery (n = 346) were removed from the analysis to assess whether associations persist beyond the immediate postpartum period. (4) Long-term mortality only: Patients who died within one year of delivery (n = 933) were removed to isolate long-term mortality risk. Additionally, to examine how associations varied across follow-up time, we conducted piecewise Cox regression analyses by fitting separate models for distinct time intervals (0–1, 1–2, 2–5, and >5 years). For each interval, patients remaining at risk at the interval start were included, with events after the interval endpoint censored (S4 Table).
For each Cox proportional hazards model, the proportional hazards assumption was evaluated both graphically using Schoenfeld residuals and formally tested using the global and variable-specific test. Variable-specific testing identified which individual covariates contributed to PH violations because global PH violations driven by adjustment covariates do not invalidate hazard ratio estimates for the primary exposure variable if that variable itself satisfies the assumption (S3 Table). Multiple comparison corrections were applied using Bonferroni and Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) methods for primary mortality outcomes (S5 Table).
Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to visualize survival probabilities across groups, and differences in survival distributions were formally tested using the log-rank test. In addition to mortality, associations between placental outcomes and a range of diagnosed health conditions (including hypertension, cardiovascular disease, sepsis, among others) were investigated. For these health outcome associations, multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs, as these conditions were assessed cross-sectionally rather than as time-to-event outcomes. Models were adjusted for maternal age, race, and SDOH indicator. Covariates included in multivariable models were selected based on theoretical relevance and data availability. No stepwise selection methods were applied. Multicollinearity among covariates was assessed using variance inflation factors (VIFs), and no VIF exceeded the threshold of 5.
HRs for mortality outcomes and ORs for health condition associations with 95% CIs and corresponding p-values are reported. All hypothesis tests were two-sided, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. No corrections for multiple comparisons were applied due to the exploratory nature of secondary analyses, though findings are interpreted cautiously. All statistical analyses were conducted using R software, version 4.5.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The complete R code used to perform the analyses is available (code in S7 Appendix). We cannot share the raw data file because it is licensed by TriNetX and their data use policies do no permit redistribution.
Results
Our final cohort comprised 638,911 vaginal deliveries: 625,890 (97.96%) with normal placental separation, 5,435 (0.85%) with placental abruption, and 7,586 (1.19%) with placental retention. Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. Health conditions including diabetes, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease were more prevalent in both placental complication groups. The mean follow-up was 3.5 years (SD 3.3), accumulating 2,213,925 total person-years of observation. During follow-up, 4,154 deaths occurred (0.65% overall mortality): 4,010 in the normal group (mortality rate: 6.4 per 1,000 deliveries or 1.85 per 1,000 person-years), 53 in the abruption group (9.8 per 1,000 deliveries or 2.93 per 1,000 person-years), and 91 in the retention group (12.0 per 1,000 deliveries or 3.66 per 1,000 person-years).
In unadjusted Cox proportional hazard analyses, both placental abruption (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.23–2.12, p < 0.001) and placental retention (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.66–2.51, p < 0.001) were associated with significantly elevated mortality compared to normal delivery (Table 2). After adjustment for demographic confounders (maternal age, race, SDOH indicator), these associations remained significant: abruption HR 1.59 (95% CI 1.21–2.08, p < 0.001) and retention HR 1.95 (95% CI 1.59–2.40, p < 0.001). Further adjustment for health conditions (diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and chronic kidney disease) modestly attenuated the associations: abruption HR 1.56 (95% CI 1.19–2.04, p = 0.001) and retention HR 1.87 (95% CI 1.52–2.30, p < 0.001).
To understand the temporal pattern of mortality risk, we conducted complementary sensitivity analyses (S6 Table). Analysis of short-term mortality, with follow-up censored at 365 days, revealed elevated mortality risk for both conditions: abruption HR 1.88 (95% CI 1.13–3.13, p = 0.016) and retention HR 1.75 (95% CI 1.12–2.73, p = 0.013). This indicates that both placental complications are associated with significantly increased mortality risk in the post-delivery period.
When excluding deaths within 42 days of delivery, the retention association remained robust (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.55–2.41, p < 0.001), while the abruption association was attenuated and no longer statistically significant (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.96–1.79, p = 0.089). This suggests that a substantial portion of abruption-associated mortality occurs within the acute postpartum period.
Analysis excluding all deaths within the first year showed persistent mortality associations for both conditions: abruption HR 1.49 (95% CI 1.08–2.06, p = 0.014) and retention HR 2.02 (95% CI 1.59–2.55, p < 0.001). These findings indicate that both placental complications are associated with elevated long-term mortality risk that extends well beyond the traditional postpartum surveillance period, with retention showing particularly strong and consistent associations across all time horizons.
The proportional hazards assumption was evaluated using Schoenfeld residuals with both global and variable-specific tests (S3 Table). While the global test indicated a violation (p = 0.0002), variable-specific testing revealed that the primary exposure variable (placental separation group) satisfied the proportional hazards assumption (p = 0.62). The global violation was driven by adjustment covariates (maternal age p = 0.011; race p = 0.0004), which does not invalidate the hazard ratio estimates for the primary exposure. The hazard ratios reported should be interpreted as average effects across the follow-up period.
Exploratory secondary analyses examined the association between placental complications and health outcomes (Table 3). Health outcomes analyzed included CDC-related maternal morbidity diagnoses, related CPT, HCPS codes, and predefined ICD codes [29,30]. Both placental abruption and retention were associated with significantly elevated odds of hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, lupus, asthma, heart failure, obesity and mental health disorders compared to normal delivery. These associations remained significant after adjustment for demographic factors. Pregnancy-specific conditions that were significantly increased in both abruption and retention included: placenta previa, preeclampsia, eclampsia, multiple gestation, PPH. Conditions that were significantly elevated in abruption only included: ischemic heart disease, and puerperal cerebrovascular disease. Conditions that were significantly elevated in retention only included: gestational hypertension, cardiovascular disease, hysterectomy, pulmonary hypertension and thyroid cancer.
Discussion
Our primary aim was to compare long-term all-cause maternal mortality in those with pathologic placental separation to those with normal separation. Our results demonstrate that both placental abruption and placental retention are associated with significantly increased long-term maternal mortality compared to normal placental separation. Additionally, our sensitivity analyses reveal distinct temporal patterns of mortality risk between these two conditions. Placental retention showed consistently higher mortality across all analyses: short-term within the first year (HR 1.75), after excluding 42-day deaths (HR 1.93), and in long-term only analysis (HR 2.02), suggesting persistent pathophysiological processes that continue to elevate mortality risk years after delivery. In contrast, placental abruption showed the highest relative risk in the short-term (HR 1.88), marked attenuation after excluding acute postpartum deaths (HR 1.31, p = 0.089), but a return to significance in long-term only analysis (HR 1.49, p = 0.014).
These distinct patterns highlight the importance of looking beyond the traditional postpartum window. Literature on maternal mortality within the first 42 days reflects high-acuity causes like postpartum hemorrhage, embolism, postpartum eclampsia, and infection. However, a large portion of maternal deaths occur after 42 days from delivery and reflect a shift to conditions like peripartum cardiomyopathy, other cardiovascular diseases, and chronic non-cardiovascular conditions. Maternal mortality reviews typically analyze mortality events during pregnancy up to one year after delivery and organize etiologies into broad categories (e.g., obstetric hemorrhage) [31–35]. This broad approach, however, can obfuscate the mortality patterns of each individual pathology. By comparing abruption and retention together, our results suggest that while both are associated with acute morbidity, their long-term trajectories may diverge.
Both conditions are known to be associated with serious obstetric hemorrhage resulting in acute maternal morbidity and mortality [1–8,15,36–41]. Consistent with the literature, our results show associations with increased health interventions such as critical care use, transfusion, and mechanical ventilation in both groups [1–8,15,36–41]. The exact chronicity of these interventions in relation to the abnormal placental separation event, however, cannot be determined from our data set. Little is known about the long-term implications for those who survive abnormal placental separation events. There is a growing body of literature suggesting connections between long-term maternal morbidity and mortality and conditions that occurred during pregnancy [31,42,43]. Abruption is associated with long-term maternal mortality and morbidity from both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular etiologies [15–21]. Similarly, retention with hemorrhage may be associated with long-term cardiovascular and cancer risks [13,14].
We identified distinct clusters of health conditions associated with each separation type that may offer insight into these differing mortality risks. In the abruption group, we found a significantly increased prevalence of ischemic heart disease and puerperal cerebrovascular accidents. Both conditions are associated with maternal mortality during delivery or in the immediate postpartum timeframe [44–47]. Conversely, in the retention group, we found a significantly increased prevalence of cardiovascular disease, pulmonary hypertension, and thyroid cancer. These conditions may be more insidious compared to the acute vascular events seen in the abruption group, potentially explaining why the elevated mortality risk in retention persists well beyond the immediate postpartum period. Our data is unable to distinguish the timing of association as these health conditions may have existed prior to or occurred after the abnormal placental separation event. Thus, additional studies are needed to further clarify this.
Though placental dysfunction and cardiovascular disease have mechanistic similarities [1,12,37,42], how these mechanisms may contribute to long-term morbidity and mortality is currently unknown. Answering these questions is clinically relevant in guiding both postpartum care and the obstetric to primary care transition. While our findings are observational, they underscore the need for further research to inform clinical recommendations for postpartum management, specifically regarding the timing, frequency, and necessary interventions for long-term follow-up in patients who experience abnormal placental separation.
The secondary aim of this study was to explore possible disease mechanisms associated with abnormal placental separation. We found a significantly increased prevalence of placenta previa and preeclampsia/eclampsia in abruption and retention groups. Further investigation into mechanisms involving implantation, placental migration, matrix metalloproteinases, apoptosis, inflammatory cytokine expression, and uterine/endometrial blood supply is needed to validate the exploratory association we identified between abnormal placental separation and placenta previa [38,39,48,49]. Additionally, further translational research on angiogenesis-related biomarkers such as soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1), placental growth factor (PlGF), and the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio is necessary to substantiate the association we found between abnormal placental separation and preeclampsia/eclampsia [36,46,50–53].
Though our results cannot identify specific biologic mechanisms, inflammation may underlie the associations we noted between abnormal placental separation and the variety of health conditions examined in our study [27,28,54–62]. We observed significant associations between hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, mental health conditions, lupus, asthma, sepsis, heart failure, and acute respiratory distress with both abnormal placental separation groups. The exact molecular mechanisms that underlie abruption and retention are currently unknown, but hypothesized mechanisms demonstrate striking similarities involving placental hypoperfusion, dysfunctional implantation/placentation, and the effects of mechanical forces on the placenta [1,6,8,63]. The significant similarities demonstrated in our study between associated health conditions with abruption and retention lends credence to the notion of possible shared molecular mechanisms in pathophysiology. Elucidating the interaction between immune function and abnormal placental separation is a promising area for future study.
The strengths of this study include our large multi-center study cohort, case control study design, comprehensive health conditions list, and our comparative approach analyzing both abruption and retention. We utilized a cohort of over 638,000 vaginal deliveries with more than 2.2 million person-years of follow-up (mean 3.5 years, SD 3.3), providing substantial statistical power to detect mortality differences. We focused on the clear outcome of mortality and excluded deliveries prior to 2008 to control for possible EHR data quality issues. Our Cox regression models had adequate statistical power with events-per-variable ratios exceeding 400 (S2 Table). The proportional hazards assumption was evaluated using Schoenfeld residuals with both global and variable-specific tests (S3 Table). While the global test indicated violation (p = 0.0002), variable-specific testing revealed that the primary exposure variable (placental separation group) satisfied the proportional hazards assumption (p = 0.62). The global violation was driven by adjustment covariates (maternal age p = 0.011; race p = 0.0004), which does not invalidate the hazard ratio estimates for the primary exposure. The hazard ratios reported should be interpreted as average effects across the follow-up period. Further sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of our primary findings.
There are several limitations to this study. Due to database limitations, diagnostic codes were used to categorize placental separation groups and identify all health conditions. Thus, our study may be subject to misclassification bias. Statistically, this misclassification may increase a type II error and possibly miss some significant associations. For example, one study reported on the differences in retained placenta prevalence when using ICD codes (2.8%) versus clinical review (7%) [64]. Despite the limitations of using a large scale database, using TriNetX may improve recognition of maternal deaths compared to standard practice of requesting maternal mortality data through medical informatics [65]. TriNetX utilization can facilitate rapid cohort identification, generating real-world evidence through regularly up-dated information and enabling large-scale observational data [66]. However, it is important to note that our study design does not allow for causational or chronologic associations due to the limitations of TriNetX. The elevated health conditions associated with abnormal placental separation could reflect associations either prior to or following the index delivery. Thus, they should be considered to demonstrate relationships with possible underlying mechanisms that need to be explored and validated in future studies. Finally, we could not fully account for the role that obesity may have played. Our results showed obesity to be elevated in retention and reduced in abruption consistent with the literature [41,50,63,67,68], however, we could not fully control for this covariate due to inconsistent information on BMI or pregnancy weight gain in the TriNetX dataset. This remains a limitation, as obesity is a known confounder for both placental complications and long-term cardiovascular mortality. Without information on BMI, we were only able to account for obesity through ICD codes which may have been inconsistent and lead to mis-classification bias. This potential bias may have mediated the mortality patterns and health condition associations that we noted with abruption and retention. Future studies that can fully account for BMI are needed to build upon our findings.
Conclusions
Long-term mortality risk in patients who experience abruption or retention during an index delivery is elevated when adjusting for demographic factors. However, the temporal nature of this risk varies: short-term mortality events appear to drive the risk in patients with abruption, whereas retention is associated with a persistent elevation in mortality extending years beyond delivery. Comparing and contrasting significant health associations between abruption and retention groups can provide exploratory information to guide further analyses. More research is needed to identify the mechanistic contributors to long-term mortality in those with abnormal placental separation.
Supporting information
S1 Table. ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes used for placental abruption, placental retention, and related conditions.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0338586.s001
(DOCX)
S2 Table. Events per variable (EPV) analysis for Cox regression models demonstrating adequate statistical power.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0338586.s002
(CSV)
S3 Table. Proportional hazards assumption tests using Schoenfeld residuals with variable-specific analysis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0338586.s003
(CSV)
S4 Table. Time-specific hazard ratios from piecewise Cox regression analyses by follow-up period.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0338586.s004
(CSV)
S5 Table. Multiple comparison corrections using Bonferroni and Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) methods for primary mortality comparisons.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0338586.s005
(CSV)
S6 Table. Complete sensitivity analysis results for mortality models including short-term (within 1 year), excluding acute deaths (≤42 days), and long-term only (excluding ≤1 year) analyses.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0338586.s006
(CSV)
References
- 1. Brandt JS, Ananth CV. Placental abruption at near-term and term gestations: pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5S):S1313–29. pmid:37164498
- 2.
Sullivan M, Skelly CL, Rouse C. Placental Abruption. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2025.
- 3. Tikkanen M. Placental abruption: epidemiology, risk factors and consequences: placental abruption, epidemiology. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(2).
- 4. Tikkanen M, Gissler M, Metsäranta M, Luukkaala T, Hiilesmaa V, Andersson S, et al. Maternal deaths in Finland: focus on placental abruption. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(10):1124–7. pmid:19707898
- 5.
Confidential Enquiry Into Maternal and Child Health: Saving Mothers’ Lives. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2003.
- 6. Perlman NC, Carusi DA. Retained placenta after vaginal delivery: risk factors and management. Int J Womens Health. 2019;11:527–34. pmid:31632157
- 7. Jiang W, Chen W, Li D. Racial and ethnic disparities in the incidence, healthcare utilization, and outcomes of retained placenta among delivery hospitalizations in the United States, 2016-2019. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):783.
- 8. Weeks AD. The retained placenta. Afr Health Sci. 2001;1(1):36–41. pmid:12789132
- 9.
Konje JC, Taylor DJ. Bleeding in late pregnancy. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: WB Saunders Co. 2006.
- 10. Weeks AD. The retained placenta. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;22(6):1103–17. pmid:18793876
- 11. Cheung WMC, Hawkes A, Ibish S, Weeks AD. The retained placenta: historical and geographical rate variations. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31(1):37–42. pmid:21280991
- 12. Ananth CV, Hansen AV, Elkind MSV, Williams MA, Rich-Edwards JW, Nybo Andersen A-M. Cerebrovascular disease after placental abruption: A population-based prospective cohort study. Neurology. 2019;93(12):e1148–58. pmid:31420459
- 13. Auger N, Marcoux S, Paradis G, Healy-Profitós J, Wei SQ, Potter BJ. Cardiovascular disease and cancer in women with accreta and retained placenta: a longitudinal cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;304(4):943–50. pmid:33817754
- 14. Troisi R, Gulbech Ording A, Grotmol T, Glimelius I, Engeland A, Gissler M, et al. Pregnancy complications and subsequent breast cancer risk in the mother: a Nordic population-based case-control study. Int J Cancer. 2018;143(8):1904–13. pmid:29752724
- 15. Downes KL, Grantz KL, Shenassa ED. Maternal, labor, delivery, and perinatal outcomes associated with placental abruption: A systematic review. Am J Perinatol. 2017;34(10):935–57.
- 16. Lykke JA, Langhoff-Roos J, Lockwood CJ, Triche EW, Paidas MJ. Mortality of mothers from cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes following pregnancy complications in first delivery: pregnancy complications and subsequent maternal mortality. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2010;24(4):323–30.
- 17. Ray JG, Schull MJ, Kingdom JC, Vermeulen MJ. Heart failure and dysrhythmias after maternal placental syndromes: HAD MPS Study. Heart. 2012;98(15):1136–41. pmid:22591737
- 18. Pariente G, Shoham-Vardi I, Kessous R, Sherf M, Sheiner E. Placental abruption as a significant risk factor for long-term cardiovascular mortality in a follow-up period of more than a decade. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2014;28(1):32–8. pmid:24118086
- 19. Arazi ES, Kessous R, Shoham-Vardi I, Pariente G, Sergienko R, Sheiner E. Is there an association between a history of placental abruption and long-term maternal renal complications?. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(14):1641–6. pmid:25234099
- 20. DeRoo L, Skjærven R, Wilcox A, Klungsøyr K, Wikström A-K, Morken N-H, et al. Placental abruption and long-term maternal cardiovascular disease mortality: a population-based registry study in Norway and Sweden. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31(5):501–11. pmid:26177801
- 21. Ray JG, Booth GL, Alter DA, Vermeulen MJ. Prognosis after maternal placental events and revascularization: PAMPER study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(1):106.e1-106.e14. pmid:26283454
- 22. Neiger R. Long-Term Effects of Pregnancy Complications on Maternal Health: A Review. J Clin Med. 2017;6(8):76. pmid:28749442
- 23. Sattar N, Greer IA. Pregnancy complications and maternal cardiovascular risk: opportunities for intervention and screening?. BMJ. 2002;325(7356):157–60. pmid:12130616
- 24. Magnussen EB, Vatten LJ, Lund-Nilsen TI, Salvesen KA, Davey Smith G, Romundstad PR. Prepregnancy cardiovascular risk factors as predictors of pre-eclampsia: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2007;335(7627):978. pmid:17975256
- 25. Brosens I, Pijnenborg R, Vercruysse L, Romero R. The “Great Obstetrical Syndromes” are associated with disorders of deep placentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(3):193–201. pmid:21094932
- 26. Fraser A, Catov JM. Placental syndromes and long-term risk of hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2023;37(8):671–4. pmid:36702879
- 27. Endler M, Saltvedt S, Papadogiannakis N. Macroscopic and histological characteristics of retained placenta: A prospectively collected case-control study. Placenta. 2016;41:39–44. pmid:27208406
- 28. Vellone VG, Peñuela L, Paudice M, Todeschini F, Buffelli F, Biggi G. What can we learn from the histopathology of retained placenta? A 15-year experience at a regional referral center. Gazz Med Ital - Arch Sci Med. 2019;178(7–8).
- 29. (CCW) CCDW. Chronic Conditions: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS); 2026 [2025-04-05]. Available from: https://www2.ccwdata.org/web/guest/condition-categories-chronic
- 30. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Identifying Severe Maternal Morbidity (SMM) 2024 [updated May 15, 20242024-04-05]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/maternal-infant-health/php/severe-maternal-morbidity/icd.html
- 31. Wang S, Rexrode KM, Florio AA, Rich-Edwards JW, Chavarro JE. Maternal Mortality in the United States: Trends and Opportunities for Prevention. Annu Rev Med. 2023;74:199–216. pmid:36706746
- 32. Diguisto C, Saucedo M, Kallianidis A, Bloemenkamp K, Bødker B, Buoncristiano M, et al. Maternal mortality in eight European countries with enhanced surveillance systems: descriptive population based study. BMJ. 2022;379:e070621. pmid:36384872
- 33. Cresswell JA, Alexander M, Chong MYC, Link HM, Pejchinovska M, Gazeley U, et al. Global and regional causes of maternal deaths 2009-20: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2025;13(4):e626–34. pmid:40064189
- 34. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Data from the Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System 2024 [2025-02-05]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/maternal-mortality/php/dataresearch/index.html#cdc_research_or_data_summary_res_data-the-data
- 35. Fong A, Leake J, Pan D, Ogunyemi D. Demographic, institutional and obstetrical risk factors for postpartum haemorrhage mortality. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;30(5):470–5. pmid:20604649
- 36. Oyelese Y, Ananth CV. Placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(4):1005–16. pmid:17012465
- 37.
Ananth C, Kinzler W. Placental abruption: pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and consequences. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health. 2019.
- 38. Gallee L, Lee M, Spence S. Association between first trimester bleeding and retained placenta requiring dilation and curettage. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021.
- 39. Rottenstreich M, Atia O, Greifner N, Rotem R, Grisaru-Granovsky S, Vernea F, et al. Prospective evaluation of clinical characteristics and maternal outcomes of women with pathologically confirmed postpartum retained placental fragments. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(25):7322–9. pmid:34219575
- 40. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 183: Postpartum Hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(4):e168–86. pmid:28937571
- 41. Favilli A, Tosto V, Ceccobelli M, Parazzini F, Franchi M, Bini V, et al. Risk factors for non-adherent retained placenta after vaginal delivery: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):268. pmid:33789611
- 42. Siddiqui N, Hladunewich M. Understanding the link between the placenta and future cardiovascular disease. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2011;21(7):188–93. pmid:22867697
- 43. Lappen JR, Pettker CM, Louis JM, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #54: Assessing the risk of maternal morbidity and mortality. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021;224(4):B2–15.
- 44. Denoble AE, Goldstein SA, Wein LE, Grotegut CA, Federspiel JJ. Impact of Pre-Existing Ischemic Heart Disease on Severe Maternal Morbidity and Mortality During Delivery Hospitalizations. JACC Adv. 2022;1(5):100157. pmid:36684662
- 45. Hardee I, Wright L, McCracken C, Lawson E, Oster ME. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Pregnancies in Women With Congenital Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(8):e017834. pmid:33821681
- 46. Zambrano MD, Miller EC. Maternal Stroke: an Update. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2019;21(9):33. pmid:31230137
- 47. Elgendy IY, Gad MM, Mahmoud AN, Keeley EC, Pepine CJ. Acute Stroke During Pregnancy and Puerperium. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(2):180–90. pmid:31948647
- 48. Jansen CHJR, Kastelein AW, Kleinrouweler CE, Van Leeuwen E, De Jong KH, Pajkrt E, et al. Development of placental abnormalities in location and anatomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(8):983–93. pmid:32108320
- 49. Cohen G, Kovo M, Biron-Shental T, Markovitch O, Daykan Y, Schreiber H. Risk factors for retained placenta in a first pregnancy-A clinical trial. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023;163(1):194–201. pmid:37078338
- 50. Endler M, Saltvedt S, Cnattingius S, Stephansson O, Wikström A-K. Retained placenta is associated with pre-eclampsia, stillbirth, giving birth to a small-for-gestational-age infant, and spontaneous preterm birth: a national register-based study. BJOG. 2014;121(12):1462–70. pmid:24703089
- 51. Herraiz I, Llurba E, Verlohren S, Galindo A. Update on the diagnosis and prognosis of preeclampsia with the aid of the sFlt-1/ PlGF ratio in singleton pregnancies. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 2017;43(2):81–9.
- 52. Signore CC, Mills JL, Qian C, Yu K-f, Lam C, Epstein FH, et al. Circulating Angiogenic Factors and Placental Abruption. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2006;108:338–44.
- 53. Zhang F, Gu M, Chen P, Wan S, Zhou Q, Lu Y, et al. Distinguishing placenta accreta from placenta previa via maternal plasma levels of sFlt-1 and PLGF and the sFlt-1/PLGF ratio. Placenta. 2022;124:48–54. pmid:35635854
- 54. Wicherek L, Klimek M, Dutsch-Wicherek M, Kolodziejski L, Skotniczny K. The molecular changes during placental detachment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;125(2):171–5. pmid:16099585
- 55. Ananth CV, Oyelese Y, Prasad V, Getahun D, Smulian JC. Evidence of placental abruption as a chronic process: associations with vaginal bleeding early in pregnancy and placental lesions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;128(1–2):15–21. pmid:16513243
- 56. Furman D, Campisi J, Verdin E, Carrera-Bastos P, Targ S, Franceschi C, et al. Chronic inflammation in the etiology of disease across the life span. Nat Med. 2019;25(12):1822–32. pmid:31806905
- 57. Franco C, Sciatti E, Favero G, Bonomini F, Vizzardi E, Rezzani R. Essential Hypertension and Oxidative Stress: Novel Future Perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(22):14489. pmid:36430967
- 58. Jayedi A, Rahimi K, Bautista LE, Nazarzadeh M, Zargar MS, Shab-Bidar S. Inflammation markers and risk of developing hypertension: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Heart. 2019;105(9):686–92. pmid:30700522
- 59. Tolkien K, Bradburn S, Murgatroyd C. An anti-inflammatory diet as a potential intervention for depressive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(5):2045–52. pmid:30502975
- 60. Batra G, Ghukasyan Lakic T, Lindbäck J, Held C, White HD, Stewart RAH, et al. Interleukin 6 and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Chronic Coronary Syndrome. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6(12):1440–5. pmid:34431970
- 61. Lee YH, Song GG. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as a biomarker of systemic inflammation in systemic lupus erythematosus: A meta-analysis and systematic review. PLoS One. 2024;19(5):e0303665. pmid:38753735
- 62. Gajecki D, Gawrys J, Szahidewicz-Krupska E, Doroszko A. Novel Molecular Mechanisms of Pulmonary Hypertension: A Search for Biomarkers and Novel Drug Targets-From Bench to Bed Site. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020;2020:7265487. pmid:32566097
- 63. Greenbaum S, Wainstock T, Dukler D, Leron E, Erez O. Underlying mechanisms of retained placenta: Evidence from a population based cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;216:12–7. pmid:28692888
- 64. Nikolajsen S, Løkkegaard ECL, Bergholt T. Reoccurrence of retained placenta at vaginal delivery: an observational study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(4):421–5. pmid:22882191
- 65. Hollenbach SJ, Drennan K, Pressman EK, Gray L. Improved Recognition of Maternal Deaths Using Modern Data Analytics. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(5):772–8. pmid:33831933
- 66. Nassar M, Abosheaishaa H, Elfert K, Beran A, Ismail A, Mohamed M, et al. TriNetX and Real-World Evidence: A Critical Review of Its Strengths, Limitations, and Bias Considerations in Clinical Research. ASIDE Intern Med. 2025;1(2):24–33. pmid:40697879
- 67. Salihu HM, Lynch O, Alio AP, Kornosky JL, Clayton HB, Mbah AK. Extreme obesity and risk of placental abruption. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(2):438–44. pmid:19049991
- 68. Nasser BH, Jadaon JE, Awad-Khamaisy N, Lfoul LA, Hendler I. Novel risk factors associated with retained placenta after vaginal birth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025;168(3):1117–23. pmid:39425612