In vitro comparison of three common essential oils mosquito repellents as inhibitors of the Ross River virus

Miora Ralambondrainy; Essia Belarbi; Wildriss Viranaicken; Renata Baranauskienė; Petras Rimantas Venskutonis; Philippe Desprès; Pierre Roques; Chaker El Kalamouni; Jimmy Sélambarom

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196757

Abstract

Background

The essential oils of Cymbopogon citratus (CC), Pelargonium graveolens (PG) and Vetiveria zizanioides (VZ) are commonly used topically to prevent mosquito bites and thus the risk of infection by their vectored pathogens such as arboviruses. However, since mosquito bites are not fully prevented, the effect of these products on the level of viral infection remains unknown.

Objectives

To evaluate in vitro the essentials oils from Reunion Island against one archetypal arbovirus, the Ross River virus (RRV), and investigate the viral cycle step that was impaired by these oils.

Methods

The essential oils were extracted by hydrodistillation and analyzed by a combination of GC-FID and GC×GC-TOF MS techniques. In vitro studies were performed on HEK293T cells to determine their cytotoxicity, their cytoprotective and virucidal capacities on RRV-T48 strain, and the level of their inhibitory effect on the viral replication and residual infectivity prior, during or following viral adsorption using the reporter virus RRV-renLuc.

Results

Each essential oil was characterized by an accurate quantification of their terpenoid content. PG yielded the least-toxic extract (CC₅₀ > 1000 μg.mL^-1). For the RRV-T48 strain, the monoterpene-rich CC and PG essential oils reduced the cytopathic effect but did not display virucidal activity. The time-of-addition assay using the gene reporter RRV-renLuc showed that the CC and PG essential oils significantly reduced viral replication and infectivity when applied prior, during and early after viral adsorption. Overall, no significant effect was observed for the low monoterpene-containing VZ essential oil.

Conclusion

The inhibitory profiles of the three essential oils suggest the high value of the monoterpene-rich essential oils from CC and PG against RRV infection. Combined with their repellent activity, the antiviral activity of the essential oils of CC and PG may provide a new option to control arboviral infection.

Figures

Citation: Ralambondrainy M, Belarbi E, Viranaicken W, Baranauskienė R, Venskutonis PR, Desprès P, et al. (2018) In vitro comparison of three common essential oils mosquito repellents as inhibitors of the Ross River virus. PLoS ONE 13(5): e0196757. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196757

Editor: Cheryl A. Stoddart, University of California, San Francisco, UNITED STATES

Received: October 9, 2017; Accepted: April 19, 2018; Published: May 17, 2018

Copyright: © 2018 Ralambondrainy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was supported by the Conseil Régional de La Réunion (Regional Council of Reunion Island) to MR and Région Ile-de-France (grant DIM-MALINF N#130053) to EB. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Management of arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) related to neglected tropical diseases has become a global health public concern [1]. The discovery of novel prophylactic or therapeutic treatments against arboviruses remain a continuous goal aimed to counter emerging virus or new viral strains [2]. Ross River virus (RRV) is a small enveloped positive-sense single-stranded RNA virus that belongs to the alphavirus genus, family Togarividae [3]. The RRV incubation period in humans was estimated to be from 7 to 9 days [4] and like the well-known Chikungunya virus that belongs to the same viral family, it typically causes fever, rash and polyarthralgia [5, 6]. RRV is endemic in Australia where it is the most common mosquito-borne pathogen with an average of 5000 cases annually [7, 8]. After the major outbreak in the Pacific area in 1979 and 1980, serological studies revealed the silent circulation of RRV in the Fiji islands [9] and more recently in French Polynesia [10, 11].

Two biological characteristics distinguish RRV from other alphaviruses: more than 40 species of mosquitoes can act as its vectors, thus, providing a large number of potential amplification cycles, and numerous warm blood host (mainly marsupials) support this virus’s replication [12]. This provides numerous opportunities for RRV to infect humans and initiate outbreak foci [13]. Indeed, during 2017, a large outbreak was observed in the South-West Region of Australia with more than 2 thousand cases reported in less than 2 months. Because the infection lead to very painful and debilitating joint, up to months after the initial onset, the disease has a direct impact on health services and calls for direct responses from the Australian authorities [14]. Consequently, RRV for which no efficient treatment is available, remains a major focus of basic research, and necessitates on-going surveys by the Australian health services [13, 15–18]. Mannose binding lectin (MBL) has been proposed as an efficient therapeutic target to alleviate RRV-induced arthritis but to date only pentosan sulfate, initially approved for the treatment of cystitis in U.S., is available [19, 20]. In an in vitro re-evaluation of 40 plants species used in Australian folk medicine, inhibition of RRV-induced cytopathic effect (25–50%) was observed with the ethanolic extract of Myoporaceae and Pittosporaceae species [21]. Essential oils are natural complex mixtures and their antiviral properties are due to complementary and overlapping mechanisms, as assumed for herpes simplex virus (HSV), influenza virus and yellow fever virus. To date, the anti-infective properties of essential oils, though of growing interest, have not been explored for RRV [22–24].

In arboviruses-related control measures, a number of essential oils are exploited as topical repellents to reduce the incidence of mosquito bites [25]. However, as yet these have not been investigated for antiviral activity at the site of infection, the skin, where they could be absorbed percutaneously. Such additional benefits of skin-applied essential oils may offer a great opportunity to control the early stages of infection, even when their repelling action fails. Cymbopogon citratus, Vetiveria zizanioides (family: Poaceae) and Pelargonium graveolens (family: Geraniaceae) are distributed worldwide and their essential oils (denoted hereafter as CC, VZ and PG, respectively), are readily available and have notable mosquito repellent properties [26]. The aim of the present study was to investigate the inhibitory effects in vitro of these three common essential oils at non-cytotoxic concentrations against RRV. We assessed their effects on both virus entry using the wild-type of RRV-T48 strain (RRV-T48) and viral replication using a recombinant RRV expressing Renilla reniformis luciferase (RRV-renLuc).

Materials and methods

Plant material

Fresh leaves of Cymbopogon citratus (DC) Strapf and Pelargonium graveolens L’Hér were harvested in July 2014 and June 2015 in Reunion Island. Roots of Vetiveria zizanioides (L.) Nash were harvested in December 2015. All plant samples were kindly provided by the CAHEB (Coopérative Agricole des Huiles Essentielles de Bourbon), Le Tampon, Reunion Island.

Essential oil isolation and analysis

Essential oils were extracted in triplicate from 2.5 kg of aerial part (PG and CC) or roots (ZV) by hydrodistillation during 3 h using a Clevenger-type apparatus. Essential oils were decanted from aqueous phase, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and filtered using Minisart filters (0.2 μm). Samples were then stored at 4°C in darkness. The chemical composition of the essential oils was quantified by gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID) on Clarus 500 gas chromatograph and identified by gas chromatography-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry on a GC×GC-TOF MS LECO Pegasus 4D system [27].

Cell culture

Human embryonic kidney cell line HEK293T (ATCC) and the kidney epithelial cell line Vero (ATCC) were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Dutscher, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France) or modified Eagle’s medium (MEM, Dutscher) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum heat inactivated (FBS, Dutscher) and completed with 2 mmol.L^-1 l-glutamine (Dutscher), 100 U.mL^-1–0.1 mg.mL^-1 penicillin-streptomycin (Dutscher), 1 mmol.L^-1 sodium pyruvate (Dutscher) and 250 μg.mL^-1 amphotericin (Dutscher). Cells were maintained in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO₂ at 37°C in Petri dishes.

Cytotoxicity assay

Cell viability was measured using the tetrazolium salt MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay [28]. Vero or HEK293T cells were seeded in 96-well plates (2×10⁵ cells/well) and allowed to adhere overnight at 37°C. Cells were then treated 21 h at 37°C with each essential oil within a wide range of concentrations (0.14–1130 μg.mL^-1). The essential oils were solubilized in 0.4% DMSO (Sigma). Following the treatment, 20 μL of 5 mg.mL^-1 MTT solution (Sigma, Saint-Quentin Fallavier France) were added on the 96-well plates and cells were stored at 37°C in the darkness. After 3 h of treatment, supernatant was removed and replaced by 100 μL of DMSO. Plates were then read at 570 nm on a microplate reader Tecan Sunrise™. The cytotoxic concentrations are defined as the concentration of the essential oil that causes death to 50% (CC₅₀) or 10% (CC₁₀) of viable cells with respect to controls without the essential oil (Table 1). Experiments were performed in hexaplicate from five independent experiments (see S1 Fig).

Download:

Table 1. Main characteristics of the essential oils.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196757.t001

Virus strains

Ross River virus derived from an infectious clone of strain T48 (RRV-T48), GenBank GQ433359 was generously provided by Professor Richard J. Khun, Purdue University [29]. The recombinant RRV-T48 expressing Renilla reniformis luciferase, as an integral part of the non-structural polyprotein precursor, was obtained according to the procedure previously described for Chikungunya virus [30]. Briefly, the resulting plasmids pRRV-renLuc was linearized and the corresponding RNA was transcribed in vitro using the kit mMESSAGE mMACHINEs Kit (Ambion) before transfection into Vero cells to provide live RRV-renLuc viruses [31]. Supernatants were collected after 48 h (first passage) and used to infect Vero cells in order to grow final virus stocks for experiments (second passage).

Plaque reduction assay

Virus titers were determined by plaque assays in Vero cells growing in 48-well plates as previously described [32]. Briefly, cells at confluence were incubated (0.1 mL/well) in triplicate with a serial of ten-fold dilutions of RRV-renLuc containing samples for 2 h at 37°C. Then, 0.1 mL of 0.8% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC, Sigma) was added. After 48 h incubation at 37°C, CMC was removed and the monolayers were fixed with 3.7% v/v of paraformaldehyde (10 min at room temperature). Cells were then stained with 0.5% w/w crystal violet solution (10 min) and the virus titer in each well was estimated by counting the number of plaques observed. The results are expressed as plaque-formation unit per milliliter (PFU.mL^-1).

Cytoprotective effect of the essential oils against RRV-T48

The capacity of the tested essential oils on RRV-T48 inducing cytopathic effect was assessed on HEK293T cells using MTT assay as described above. HEK293T were seeded in 96-well plates (2×10⁵ cells/well) and allowed to adhere overnight at 37°C. Cells were infected by RRV-T48 alone at MOI 2 or by RRV-T48 at MOI 2 and addition of the essential oil at the highest non-toxic concentration (1×CC₁₀) during 2 h at 37°C. After virus adsorption, supernatants were removed and cell culture medium or 1×CC₁₀ of the essential oil was added again. Cell viability was measured at different time points from incubation at 37°C (6;12;18;24;30;36;42;48 or 24;32;48 h post-infection). Controls consist in RRV-infected-HEK293T cells untreated with the essential oils. Chloroquine at non-toxic concentration was used as positive control.

Virucidal activity of the essential oils against RRV-T48 and entry assay

To determine the virucidal activity, each essential oil at concentrations 0.1×CC₁₀ or 1×CC₁₀ was mixed with the RRV-T48 strain (1×10⁵ PFU) during 1 h at 37°C. The residual infectivity was titrated by plaque assay on Vero cells with a serial of ten-fold dilutions. For the entry assay, Vero cells monolayers were pre-treated 3 h at 37°C with the essential oils. The residual infectivity of RRV-T48 strain was then titrated by plaque assay with a serial of ten-fold dilutions on the pre-treated Vero cells. All the experiments were performed in triplicate from five independent experiments and controls consist in RRV-T48-infected Vero cells without treatment with the essential oils.

RRV-renLuc reporter assay

After infection with RRV-renLuc, the luciferase reporter is released in the cytoplasm during the polyprotein processing. HEK293T cells were seeded in 96well plates (2×10⁵ cells/well) and allowed to adhere overnight at 37°C. Cells were infected with RRV-renLuc at MOI 2 for 48 h. At different time points (6;12;18;24;30;36;42;48 h post-infection), supernatants were removed and cells were lysed using 20 μL of lysis buffer (0.4% CHAPS, 10% glycerol, 1 mmol.L^-1 EGTA, Tris-HCl, Sigma). 100 μL of the substrate coelenterazine (Euromedex, Souffelweyersheim, France) were then added and plates were immediately read by a luminescent plate-reader FLUOstar® Omega (BMG Labtech, Offenburg, Germany). Experiments were performed in hexaplicate from five independent experiments.

Time-of-addition assay

To assess the effect of the essential oils on the replication of RRV, HEK293T cells were seeded in 96-well plates (2×10⁵ cells/well) and allowed to adhere overnight at 37°C. Cells were infected with RRV-renLuc at MOI 2 in presence of the essential oil. The essential oils were added at the highest non-toxic concentration (1×CC₁₀): (i) 3 h before virus incubation (pre-treatment) and after virus incubation; (ii) during virus incubation (co-treatment) and after virus incubation; (iii) 2 h, 4 h or 6 h after virus incubation (post-treatment). In all cases, the luciferase activity was measured in hexaplicate from five independent experiments by the RRV-renLuc assay. Virus titers were determined from five independent experiments from harvested supernatants. The end point of these two analyses was 24 h post-infection. Controls consist in RRV-infected-HEK293T cells untreated with the essential oils. Chloroquine at non-toxic concentration was used as positive control.

Statistical analysis

Where applicable, a one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukeys or Dunn’s post-test when relevant, using the GraphPad Prism software, version 7.01 (GraphPad Software Inc.). A p value lower than 0.05 was considered significant. Values are reported as the means standard errors (SEM) of n = 5 determinations unless otherwise stated. For the cytotoxicity assay, values were derived from dose-response curves and were calculated using GraphPad Prism.

Results

Chemical composition and cytotoxicity of essential oils

The combination of GC-FID and GC-TOF MS allowed identifying 37, 67 and 53 components of the essential oils from CC, PG and VZ, respectively, and their major components are listed in Table 1 (detailed chemical compositions are available in S1–S3 Tables). For the CC essential oil, the major components were the two isomeric monoterpene aldehydes geranial (45.11%) and neral (36.11%) and a high amount of the monoterpene hydrocarbon myrcene (7.85%) typical for essential oils of African origin [33]. The chemical composition of the PG oil was also found to be in accordance with the African type [34] with five major monoterpenes, including citronellol (23.43%), geraniol (16.85%) and linalool (10.79%) alcohols beside the citronellyl formate ester (12.29%) and isomenthone ketone (7.06%). The major components identified for the VZ extract include the sesquiterpenes khusimol (23.78%), (E)-isovalencenol (6.79%) and α-vetivone (3.84%), which are related to the Reunion chemotype [35]. The cytotoxic concentrations CC₅₀ and CC₁₀ of the three essential oils are reported in Table 1. The lowest CCs values were found for the CC essential oil followed by that of VZ, with the PG essential oil proving to be far less toxic (CC₅₀> 1000 μg.mL^-1; CC₁₀ = 533 ± 199 μg.mL^-1).

Cytoprotective effect of the essential oils against RRV-T48

The antiviral activity of the essential oils was first screened by assessing the reduction of the viral cytopathic effect through determination of the viability of HEK293T cells by an MTT assay after infection by RRV-T48 at MOI 2. As shown in Fig 1, the viability of the infected cells without treatment was dramatically reduced beyond 30 h post-infection. Upon treatment by the essential oils at the non-toxic concentration 1×CC₁₀, cell viability was determined at 24 h, 32 h or 48 h post-infection and compared with untreated cells. The results in Fig 1B showed that cell viability increases significantly at 32 h post-infection upon treatment with the essentials oils of CC (p < 0.01) or PG (p < 0.005). However, there was no more significant difference at 48 h post-infection.

Download:

Fig 1. Viability of HEK293T cells infected with RRV-T48.

A: without treatment by the essential oils; B: upon treatment with the essential oil at the concentration 1×CC₁₀ at 24, 32 or 48 h post-infection. Controls (CTL) consist in untreated cells with the essential oils and results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5). Statistical analysis was performed with Prism 7 (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196757.g001

Virucidal activity of essential oils against RRV-T48 and entry assay

In order to determine whether the essential oils interfere with virus entry, the residual infectivity was determined by plaque assay on Vero cells incubated with a mixture of virus (1×10⁵ PFU) and the essential oils (0.1×CC₁₀ or 1×CC₁₀). The infected cells without exposure to the essential oils were used as controls. As shown in Fig 2A, no significant effect was observed whichever essential oil was used. For the entry assay performed on cells pre-treated with the essential oils before infection, viral progeny production was not affected (Fig 2B).

Download:

Fig 2.

Infectious capacity of RRV-T48 determined by plaque assay on infected Vero cells after pre-treatment of the viruses (1×10⁵ PFU) with the essential oils: A: residual infectivity; pre-treatment of the cells with the essential oils B: entry inhibition. Controls are infected cells and virus without treatment by the essential oils and values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196757.g002

Inhibition of RRV-renLuc replication by the essential oils

In order to determine the inhibitory effects of the essential oils at the early stage of the viral replication, we used a luciferase-based monitoring method using RRV-renLuc and controlled the residual infectivity by plaque assay. The time course of infection of RRV-renLuc (MOI 2) on HEK293T cells was first determined to guide subsequent experiments. We observed that the luciferase activity increases until 36 h post-infection (Fig 3) while the viral progeny production reaches a maximum at 30 h post-infection (Fig 3). Thus, the effect of essential oils on RRV-renLuc replication levels was determined 24 h after infection.

Download:

Fig 3. Time course of infection from RRV determined by plaque assay on infected Vero cells and luciferase activity on infected HEK293T cells.

Results are expressed as a mean ± SEM (n = 5).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196757.g003

In a preliminary assessment, we compared the inhibitory capacity of the essential oils with that of the broad-range viral replication inhibitor chloroquine [36]. As shown in Fig 4A, at the non-toxic concentration 1×CC₁₀ for the essential oils and for chloroquine, cell viability was not affected. Maximal reduction of luciferase activity and residual infectivity was observed for the PG essential oil (Fig 4B and 4C).

Download:

Fig 4. Comparative effect of the essential oils on HEK293T against RRV.

Viability of HEK293T cells infected with RRV-T48 (MOI 2) upon treatment with chloroquine at the concentration 20 μg.mL^-1and essential oil at the concentration 1× CC₁₀ at 24 h post-infection (A); Inhibition of RRV-renLuc replication at MOI 2 using co-treatment of chloroquine at the concentration 20 μg.mL^-1and essential oil at the concentration 1× CC₁₀ (B); Viral growth by plaque assay on Vero cells (C). Controls are RRV-infected cells without treatment by chloroquine and the essential oils. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5). (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196757.g004

To assess if the inhibitory effects of the essential oils is related to the viral absorption or entry we altered treatment timing (pre-treatment, co-treatment or post-treatment, Fig 5).

Download:

Fig 5. Time points of essentials oils addition and end point of analysis using RRV-renLuc infection at MOI 2 on HEK293T cells.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196757.g005

The overall results are presented in Fig 6. Using the CC essential oil, only pretreatment and co-treatment significantly decrease both luciferase activity and residual infectivity titer. The maximum inhibitory effect was observed for co-treatment, with both a luciferase activity level and a virus residual infectivity titer down close to 50% of the non-treated (p ≤ 0.01 and p≤ 0.05 respectively). For the PG essential oil, all treatments induced a significant decrease of the virus activity with the lowest level of luciferase activity observed for pre-treatment (34%) but later was the treatment, more increased the luciferase activity to reach a high level (67%) for post-treatment at 6 h post-infection (ANOVA one-way test for trend slope = 13.2, p<0.001). However, the reduction in virus residual infectivity titer is always significant (p<0.05 to 0.01) compared to non-treated control, it varied in a non-regular manner not significantly different whatever was the timing of treatment (p>0.058, Kruskal-Wallis test) even if maximum reduction was observed by co-treatment and post-treatment at 4 h post-infection (< 20%). In contrast, the VZ essential oil exhibited no significant effect either on luciferase activity or on viral progeny production whatever was the treatment timing. Thus, the inhibitory profiles were found to be significantly different for the three tested essential oils.

Download:

Fig 6. Inhibition of RRV-renLuc replication by the 3 essential oils under the experimental conditions shown in Fig 5.

HEK293T was exposed to RRV-renLuc at MOI 2 and treated as shown in Fig 5 with essential oils (A) luciferase activity on HEK293T cells (B) Viral growth by plaque assay on Vero cells. Controls are RRV-renLuc-infected cells infected without treatment by the essential oils. Values are expressed as relative percentage ± SEM (n = 5). (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196757.g006

Discussion

Essential oils have demonstrated a wide range of biological activities (e.g. antibacterial, antifungal, antioxidants, etc…) and remain promising sources of new therapeutics [37, 38]. A growing attention has been given to the antiviral capacity of essential oils against arboviruses as illustrated for dengue serotype 2 (DEN-2) virus [39], Yellow Fever virus (YFV) [40], and Japanese Encephalitis virus (JEV) [41]. To the best of our knowledge, none of the available essential oils used as topical mosquito repellents have not yet been investigated for their antiviral capacity against mosquito-borne viruses. In here, we investigated such inhibitory effects of three common essential oils of CC, PG and VZ at non-toxic concentrations against RRV infection.

For this study, HEK293T cells were selected for their high sensitivity to the viral cytopathic effect, in contrast to the resistant skin cell lines [42]. In addition, we used a representative RRV strain to provide a fast and representative evaluation of essential oils against the alphaviruses family.

The cytopathic effect of RRV-T48 on HEK293T cells observed after 30 h post-infection (Fig 1A) and the time-limited cytoprotective effect of the tested essential oils at 32 h post-infection clearly indicated the best opportunity to control RRV infection at the early stages. Specific assays (Fig 2) showed that the essential oils do not have virucidal activity and could not interfere with virus entry at the two non-toxic concentrations tested (0.1×CC₁₀ and 1×CC₁₀). Thus, we carried out further investigations to determine the inhibitory effect of the essential oil on viral replication. This was supported by the time course of infection of RRV-renLuc at MOI 2 that reached a maximum at 36 hours (Fig 3A), leading us to select the endpoint of monitoring at 24 h post-infection for both the luciferase activity and the residual infectivity upon different treatments by the essential oils (Fig 5).

Interestingly, the time-of-addition assay showed that the additional supply of the essential oils of CC and PG prior or during or the viral adsorption (pre-treatment or co-treatment) provides the most significant inhibition of the viral replication (Fig 6A). The viral replication was also reduced in post-treatment (Fig 6A), but only the PG essential oil exhibited a marked effect on the residual infectivity (Fig 6B). This latter result suggests that the PG essential oil may also interfere with the post-transcriptional stage of the virus life cycle.

Thus, the results showed the high potential of the PG essential oil against RRV, as it has low cytotoxicity (CC₅₀ > 1000 μg.mL^-1) and displays noteworthy inhibitory effects when present prior, during or after infection. The CC essential oil, which presented the highest cytotoxicity (CC₅₀ = 49.5 ± 20.5 μg.mL^-1), exhibited a moderate antiviral activity when introduced prior or during the viral absorption. In contrast, there was no evidence for an inhibitory effect from the VZ essential oil. The contribution of the major components of essential oils to their antiviral properties has been claimed in the case of HSV-1 [43–45]. PG and CC essential oils are monoterpene-rich essential oils in contrast to the non-active VZ essential oil that is mainly constituted by sesquiterpenes. Thus, we propose that antiviral capacity is related to the monoterpene composition, and the actual molecular components deserve to be characterized and explored further.

Conclusion

The repellent activity of the three essential oils from CC, PG and VZ was known from folk medicine. The present study provides the first investigation of their antiviral activity against RRV infection. The different inhibitory profiles of these three essential oils suggest a relationship with their chemical compositions. Exposure to these oils prior or at the same time as viral infection resulted in the highest inhibitory effects and suggest that the primary application of these essential oils as repellents may further provide an additional valuable preventive effect against the viral infection. Our findings demonstrate the value of re-evaluating essential oils mosquito repellents for their antiviral capacity, as this might provide a novel, eco-friendly and cost-effective strategy in the prevention of arboviruses infection.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Determination of essential oils cytotoxicity on HEK293T.

Viability of HEK293T cells was determined by MTT assay upon treatment by the essential oils of CC (A); PG (B); VZ (C). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3). Dashed line indicated the CC₁₀.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196757.s001

(DOCX)

S1 Table. Chemical composition of the leaf Cymbopogon citratus (CC) essential oil from Reunion Island, area percentage mean ± standard deviation (n = 9).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196757.s002

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Chemical composition of the leaf Pelargonium graveolens (PG) essential oil from Reunion Island, area percentage mean ± standard deviation (n = 9).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196757.s003

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Chemical composition of the roots Vetiveria zizanioides (ZV) essential oil from Reunion Island, area percentage mean ± standard deviation (n = 6).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196757.s004

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

To Professor Richard J. Kuhn, Purdue University for the generous gift of the plasmid containing the Ross River virus strain T48 (RRV-T48) sequence, GenBank GQ433359. To Dr George Snounou for English wording review. To DIM-MALINF (Région Ile de France) for support of E.B and Regional Council of Reunion Island for support to M.R.

References

1. Dye C, Mertens T, Hirnschall G, Mpanju-Shumbusho W, Newman RD, Raviglione MC, et al. WHO and the future of disease control programmes. Lancet. 2013;381(9864):413–8. Epub 2013/02/05. pmid:23374479
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Liang G, Gao X, Gould EA. Factors responsible for the emergence of arboviruses; strategies, challenges and limitations for their control. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2015;4(3):e18. Epub 2015/06/04. pmid:26038768
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Atkins GJ. The Pathogenesis of Alphaviruses. International Scholarly Research Notices. 2012;2013.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Fraser JR, Cunningham AL. Incubation time of epidemic polyarthritis. Med J Aust. 1980;1(11):550–1. Epub 1980/05/31. pmid:6104774
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Suhrbier A, Jaffar-Bandjee MC, Gasque P. Arthritogenic alphaviruses—an overview. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012;8(7):420–9. Epub 2012/05/09. pmid:22565316
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Liu X, Tharmarajah K, Taylor A. Ross River virus disease clinical presentation, pathogenesis and current therapeutic strategies. Microbes Infect. 2017;19(11):496–504. Epub 2017/07/30. pmid:28754345
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Harley D, Sleigh A, Ritchie S. Ross River virus transmission, infection, and disease: a cross-disciplinary review. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001;14(4):909–32, table of contents. Epub 2001/10/05. pmid:11585790
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Mackenzie JS, Lindsay MDA, Smith DW, Imrie A. The ecology and epidemiology of Ross River and Murray Valley encephalitis viruses in Western Australia: examples of One Health in Action. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2017;111(6):248–54. Epub 2017/10/19. pmid:29044370
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Klapsing P, MacLean JD, Glaze S, McClean KL, Drebot MA, Lanciotti RS, et al. Ross River virus disease reemergence, Fiji, 2003–2004. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11(4):613–5. Epub 2005/04/15. pmid:15829203
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Aubry M, Finke J, Teissier A, Roche C, Broult J, Paulous S, et al. Silent Circulation of Ross River Virus in French Polynesia. Int J Infect Dis. 2015;37:19–24. Epub 2015/06/19. pmid:26086687
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Aubry M, Teissier A, Huart M, Merceron S, Vanhomwegen J, Roche C, et al. Ross River Virus Seroprevalence, French Polynesia, 2014–2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(10):1751–3. Epub 2017/09/21. pmid:28930020
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Claflin SB, Webb CE. Ross River Virus: Many Vectors and Unusual Hosts Make for an Unpredictable Pathogen. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11(9):e1005070. Epub 2015/09/04. pmid:26335937
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Flies EJ, Weinstein P, Anderson SJ, Koolhof I, Foufopoulos J, Williams CR. Ross River virus and the necessity of multi-scale, eco-epidemiological analyses. J Infect Dis. 2017. Epub 2017/12/08. pmid:29216368
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Governement of Western Australia. Ross River and Barmah Forest virus disease risk warning 2017. Available from: http://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/Media-releases/2017/Ross-River-and-Barmah-Forest-virus-disease-risk-warning.
15. Faddy HM, Tran TV, Hoad VC, Seed CR, Viennet E, Chan HT, et al. Ross River virus in Australian blood donors: possible implications for blood transfusion safety. Transfusion. 2018. Epub 2018/01/20. pmid:29350414
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Gunn BM, Jones JE, Shabman RS, Whitmore AC, Sarkar S, Blevins LK, et al. Ross River virus envelope glycans contribute to disease through activation of the host complement system. Virology. 2018;515:250–60. Epub 2018/01/13. pmid:29324290
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Mazzon M, Castro C, Thaa B, Liu L, Mutso M, Liu X, et al. Alphavirus-induced hyperactivation of PI3K/AKT directs pro-viral metabolic changes. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14(1):e1006835. Epub 2018/01/30. pmid:29377936
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Haist KC, Burrack KS, Davenport BJ, Morrison TE. Inflammatory monocytes mediate control of acute alphavirus infection in mice. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13(12):e1006748. Epub 2017/12/16. pmid:29244871
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Gunn BM, Morrison TE, Whitmore AC, Blevins LK, Hueston L, Fraser RJ, et al. Mannose binding lectin is required for alphavirus-induced arthritis/myositis. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(3):e1002586. Epub 2012/03/30. pmid:22457620
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Herrero LJ, Foo SS, Sheng KC, Chen W, Forwood MR, Bucala R, et al. Pentosan Polysulfate: a Novel Glycosaminoglycan-Like Molecule for Effective Treatment of Alphavirus-Induced Cartilage Destruction and Inflammatory Disease. J Virol. 2015;89(15):8063–76. Epub 2015/05/29. pmid:26018160
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Semple SJ, Reynolds GD, O'Leary MC, Flower RL. Screening of Australian medicinal plants for antiviral activity. J Ethnopharmacol. 1998;60(2):163–72. Epub 1998/05/15. pmid:9582007
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Bakkali F, Averbeck S, Averbeck D, Idaomar M. Biological effects of essential oils—a review. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008;46(2):446–75. Epub 2007/11/13. pmid:17996351
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Jassim SA, Naji MA. Novel antiviral agents: a medicinal plant perspective. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;95(3):412–27. Epub 2003/08/13. pmid:12911688
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Raut JS, Karuppayil SM. A status review on the medicinal properties of essential oils. Industrial Crops and Products. 2014;62:250–64.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Nerio LS, Olivero-Verbel J, Stashenko E. Repellent activity of essential oils: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(1):372–8. Epub 2009/09/05. pmid:19729299
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Pohlit AM, Lopes NP, Gama RA, Tadei WP, Neto VF. Patent literature on mosquito repellent inventions which contain plant essential oils—a review. Planta Med. 2011;77(6):598–617. Epub 2011/02/18. pmid:21328177
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Baranauskiene R, Rutkaite R, Peciulyte L, Kazernaviciute R, Venskutonis PR. Preparation and characterization of single and dual propylene oxide and octenyl succinic anhydride modified starch carriers for the microencapsulation of essential oils. Food Funct. 2016;7(8):3555–65. Epub 2016/07/29. pmid:27465989
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65(1–2):55–63. Epub 1983/12/16. pmid:6606682
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Kuhn RJ, Niesters HG, Hong Z, Strauss JH. Infectious RNA transcripts from Ross River virus cDNA clones and the construction and characterization of defined chimeras with Sindbis virus. Virology. 1991;182(2):430–41. Epub 1991/06/01. pmid:1673812
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Henrik Gad H, Paulous S, Belarbi E, Diancourt L, Drosten C, Kummerer BM, et al. The E2-E166K substitution restores Chikungunya virus growth in OAS3 expressing cells by acting on viral entry. Virology. 2012;434(1):27–37. Epub 2012/08/15. pmid:22889614
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Krejbich-Trotot P, Belarbi E, Ralambondrainy M, El-Kalamouni C, Viranaicken W, Roques P, et al. The growth of arthralgic Ross River virus is restricted in human monocytic cells. Virus Res. 2016;225:64–8. Epub 2016/09/18. pmid:27637347
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Frumence E, Roche M, Krejbich-Trotot P, El-Kalamouni C, Nativel B, Rondeau P, et al. The South Pacific epidemic strain of Zika virus replicates efficiently in human epithelial A549 cells leading to IFN-beta production and apoptosis induction. Virology. 2016;493:217–26. Epub 2016/04/10. pmid:27060565
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Avoseh O, Oyedeji O, Rungqu P, Nkeh-Chungag B, Oyedeji A. Cymbopogon species; ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry and the pharmacological importance. Molecules. 2015;20(5):7438–53. Epub 2015/04/29. pmid:25915460
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Sharopov FS, Zhang H, Setzer WN. Composition of geranium (Pelargonium graveolens) essential oil from Tajikistan American Journal of Essential Oils and Natural Products. 2014;2(2):13–6.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Chahal KK, Bhardwaj U, Kaushal S, Sandhu K. Chemical composition and biological properties of Chrysopogon zizanioides (L.) Roberty syn. Vetiveria zizanioides (L.). Indian Journal of Natural Products and Resources. 2015;6:251–60.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Savarino A, Boelaert JR, Cassone A, Majori G, Cauda R. Effects of chloroquine on viral infections: an old drug against today's diseases? Lancet Infect Dis. 2003;3(11):722–7. Epub 2003/11/01. pmid:14592603
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Nakatsu T, Lupo AT, Chinn JW, Kang RKL. Biological activity of essential oils and their constituents. In: Atta ur R, editor. Studies in Natural Products Chemistry. 21: Elsevier; 2000. p. 571–631.
38. Properzi A, Angelini P, Bertuzzi G, Venanzoni R. Some Biological Activities of Essential Oils. Medicinal & Aromatic Plants. 2013;2:136.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Garcia CC, Talarico L, Almeida N, Colombres S, Duschatzky C, Damonte EB. Virucidal activity of essential oils from aromatic plants of San Luis, Argentina. Phytother Res. 2003;17(9):1073–5. Epub 2003/11/05. pmid:14595590
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Meneses R, Ocazionez RE, Martinez JR, Stashenko EE. Inhibitory effect of essential oils obtained from plants grown in Colombia on yellow fever virus replication in vitro. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2009;8:8. Epub 2009/03/10. pmid:19267922
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Roy S, Chaurvedi P, Chowdhary A. Evaluation of antiviral activity of essential oil of Trachyspermum Ammi against Japanese encephalitis virus. Pharmacognosy Res. 2015;7(3):263–7. Epub 2015/07/02. pmid:26130938
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Assi M, Thon-Hon VG, Jaffar-Bandjee MC, Martinez A, Gasque P. Regulation of type I-interferon responses in the human epidermal melanocyte cell line SKMEL infected by the Ross River alphavirus. Cytokine. 2015;76(2):572–6. Epub 2015/07/15. pmid:26159111
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Astani A, Reichling J, Schnitzler P. Comparative study on the antiviral activity of selected monoterpenes derived from essential oils. Phytother Res. 2010;24(5):673–9. Epub 2009/08/05. pmid:19653195
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Astani A, Reichling J, Schnitzler P. Screening for antiviral activities of isolated compounds from essential oils. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:253643. Epub 2009/12/17. pmid:20008902
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Astani A, Schnitzler P. Antiviral activity of monoterpenes beta-pinene and limonene against herpes simplex virus in vitro. Iran J Microbiol. 2014;6(3):149–55. Epub 2015/04/15. pmid:25870747
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Dye C, Mertens T, Hirnschall G, Mpanju-Shumbusho W, Newman RD, Raviglione MC, et al. WHO and the future of disease control programmes. Lancet. 2013;381(9864):413–8. Epub 2013/02/05. pmid:23374479
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Liang G, Gao X, Gould EA. Factors responsible for the emergence of arboviruses; strategies, challenges and limitations for their control. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2015;4(3):e18. Epub 2015/06/04. pmid:26038768
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Atkins GJ. The Pathogenesis of Alphaviruses. International Scholarly Research Notices. 2012;2013.
View Article
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Fraser JR, Cunningham AL. Incubation time of epidemic polyarthritis. Med J Aust. 1980;1(11):550–1. Epub 1980/05/31. pmid:6104774
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[13] View Article

[14] PubMed/NCBI

[15] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Suhrbier A, Jaffar-Bandjee MC, Gasque P. Arthritogenic alphaviruses—an overview. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012;8(7):420–9. Epub 2012/05/09. pmid:22565316
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] PubMed/NCBI

[19] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Liu X, Tharmarajah K, Taylor A. Ross River virus disease clinical presentation, pathogenesis and current therapeutic strategies. Microbes Infect. 2017;19(11):496–504. Epub 2017/07/30. pmid:28754345
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[21] View Article

[22] PubMed/NCBI

[23] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Harley D, Sleigh A, Ritchie S. Ross River virus transmission, infection, and disease: a cross-disciplinary review. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001;14(4):909–32, table of contents. Epub 2001/10/05. pmid:11585790
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[25] View Article

[26] PubMed/NCBI

[27] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Mackenzie JS, Lindsay MDA, Smith DW, Imrie A. The ecology and epidemiology of Ross River and Murray Valley encephalitis viruses in Western Australia: examples of One Health in Action. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2017;111(6):248–54. Epub 2017/10/19. pmid:29044370
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] PubMed/NCBI

[31] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Klapsing P, MacLean JD, Glaze S, McClean KL, Drebot MA, Lanciotti RS, et al. Ross River virus disease reemergence, Fiji, 2003–2004. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11(4):613–5. Epub 2005/04/15. pmid:15829203
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] PubMed/NCBI

[35] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Aubry M, Finke J, Teissier A, Roche C, Broult J, Paulous S, et al. Silent Circulation of Ross River Virus in French Polynesia. Int J Infect Dis. 2015;37:19–24. Epub 2015/06/19. pmid:26086687
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] PubMed/NCBI

[39] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Aubry M, Teissier A, Huart M, Merceron S, Vanhomwegen J, Roche C, et al. Ross River Virus Seroprevalence, French Polynesia, 2014–2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(10):1751–3. Epub 2017/09/21. pmid:28930020
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] PubMed/NCBI

[43] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Claflin SB, Webb CE. Ross River Virus: Many Vectors and Unusual Hosts Make for an Unpredictable Pathogen. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11(9):e1005070. Epub 2015/09/04. pmid:26335937
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] PubMed/NCBI

[47] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Flies EJ, Weinstein P, Anderson SJ, Koolhof I, Foufopoulos J, Williams CR. Ross River virus and the necessity of multi-scale, eco-epidemiological analyses. J Infect Dis. 2017. Epub 2017/12/08. pmid:29216368
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[49] View Article

[50] PubMed/NCBI

[51] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Governement of Western Australia. Ross River and Barmah Forest virus disease risk warning 2017. Available from: http://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/Media-releases/2017/Ross-River-and-Barmah-Forest-virus-disease-risk-warning.

[ref15] 15. Faddy HM, Tran TV, Hoad VC, Seed CR, Viennet E, Chan HT, et al. Ross River virus in Australian blood donors: possible implications for blood transfusion safety. Transfusion. 2018. Epub 2018/01/20. pmid:29350414
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Gunn BM, Jones JE, Shabman RS, Whitmore AC, Sarkar S, Blevins LK, et al. Ross River virus envelope glycans contribute to disease through activation of the host complement system. Virology. 2018;515:250–60. Epub 2018/01/13. pmid:29324290
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Mazzon M, Castro C, Thaa B, Liu L, Mutso M, Liu X, et al. Alphavirus-induced hyperactivation of PI3K/AKT directs pro-viral metabolic changes. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14(1):e1006835. Epub 2018/01/30. pmid:29377936
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Haist KC, Burrack KS, Davenport BJ, Morrison TE. Inflammatory monocytes mediate control of acute alphavirus infection in mice. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13(12):e1006748. Epub 2017/12/16. pmid:29244871
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Gunn BM, Morrison TE, Whitmore AC, Blevins LK, Hueston L, Fraser RJ, et al. Mannose binding lectin is required for alphavirus-induced arthritis/myositis. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(3):e1002586. Epub 2012/03/30. pmid:22457620
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Herrero LJ, Foo SS, Sheng KC, Chen W, Forwood MR, Bucala R, et al. Pentosan Polysulfate: a Novel Glycosaminoglycan-Like Molecule for Effective Treatment of Alphavirus-Induced Cartilage Destruction and Inflammatory Disease. J Virol. 2015;89(15):8063–76. Epub 2015/05/29. pmid:26018160
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Semple SJ, Reynolds GD, O'Leary MC, Flower RL. Screening of Australian medicinal plants for antiviral activity. J Ethnopharmacol. 1998;60(2):163–72. Epub 1998/05/15. pmid:9582007
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Bakkali F, Averbeck S, Averbeck D, Idaomar M. Biological effects of essential oils—a review. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008;46(2):446–75. Epub 2007/11/13. pmid:17996351
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Jassim SA, Naji MA. Novel antiviral agents: a medicinal plant perspective. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;95(3):412–27. Epub 2003/08/13. pmid:12911688
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Raut JS, Karuppayil SM. A status review on the medicinal properties of essential oils. Industrial Crops and Products. 2014;62:250–64.
View Article
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Nerio LS, Olivero-Verbel J, Stashenko E. Repellent activity of essential oils: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(1):372–8. Epub 2009/09/05. pmid:19729299
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] PubMed/NCBI

[95] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Pohlit AM, Lopes NP, Gama RA, Tadei WP, Neto VF. Patent literature on mosquito repellent inventions which contain plant essential oils—a review. Planta Med. 2011;77(6):598–617. Epub 2011/02/18. pmid:21328177
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] PubMed/NCBI

[99] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Baranauskiene R, Rutkaite R, Peciulyte L, Kazernaviciute R, Venskutonis PR. Preparation and characterization of single and dual propylene oxide and octenyl succinic anhydride modified starch carriers for the microencapsulation of essential oils. Food Funct. 2016;7(8):3555–65. Epub 2016/07/29. pmid:27465989
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] PubMed/NCBI

[103] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65(1–2):55–63. Epub 1983/12/16. pmid:6606682
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] PubMed/NCBI

[107] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Kuhn RJ, Niesters HG, Hong Z, Strauss JH. Infectious RNA transcripts from Ross River virus cDNA clones and the construction and characterization of defined chimeras with Sindbis virus. Virology. 1991;182(2):430–41. Epub 1991/06/01. pmid:1673812
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] PubMed/NCBI

[111] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Henrik Gad H, Paulous S, Belarbi E, Diancourt L, Drosten C, Kummerer BM, et al. The E2-E166K substitution restores Chikungunya virus growth in OAS3 expressing cells by acting on viral entry. Virology. 2012;434(1):27–37. Epub 2012/08/15. pmid:22889614
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[113] View Article

[114] PubMed/NCBI

[115] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Krejbich-Trotot P, Belarbi E, Ralambondrainy M, El-Kalamouni C, Viranaicken W, Roques P, et al. The growth of arthralgic Ross River virus is restricted in human monocytic cells. Virus Res. 2016;225:64–8. Epub 2016/09/18. pmid:27637347
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] PubMed/NCBI

[119] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Frumence E, Roche M, Krejbich-Trotot P, El-Kalamouni C, Nativel B, Rondeau P, et al. The South Pacific epidemic strain of Zika virus replicates efficiently in human epithelial A549 cells leading to IFN-beta production and apoptosis induction. Virology. 2016;493:217–26. Epub 2016/04/10. pmid:27060565
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[121] View Article

[122] PubMed/NCBI

[123] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Avoseh O, Oyedeji O, Rungqu P, Nkeh-Chungag B, Oyedeji A. Cymbopogon species; ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry and the pharmacological importance. Molecules. 2015;20(5):7438–53. Epub 2015/04/29. pmid:25915460
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[125] View Article

[126] PubMed/NCBI

[127] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Sharopov FS, Zhang H, Setzer WN. Composition of geranium (Pelargonium graveolens) essential oil from Tajikistan American Journal of Essential Oils and Natural Products. 2014;2(2):13–6.
View Article
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Chahal KK, Bhardwaj U, Kaushal S, Sandhu K. Chemical composition and biological properties of Chrysopogon zizanioides (L.) Roberty syn. Vetiveria zizanioides (L.). Indian Journal of Natural Products and Resources. 2015;6:251–60.
View Article
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Savarino A, Boelaert JR, Cassone A, Majori G, Cauda R. Effects of chloroquine on viral infections: an old drug against today's diseases? Lancet Infect Dis. 2003;3(11):722–7. Epub 2003/11/01. pmid:14592603
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] PubMed/NCBI

[137] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Nakatsu T, Lupo AT, Chinn JW, Kang RKL. Biological activity of essential oils and their constituents. In: Atta ur R, editor. Studies in Natural Products Chemistry. 21: Elsevier; 2000. p. 571–631.

[ref38] 38. Properzi A, Angelini P, Bertuzzi G, Venanzoni R. Some Biological Activities of Essential Oils. Medicinal & Aromatic Plants. 2013;2:136.
View Article
Google Scholar

[140] View Article

[141] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Garcia CC, Talarico L, Almeida N, Colombres S, Duschatzky C, Damonte EB. Virucidal activity of essential oils from aromatic plants of San Luis, Argentina. Phytother Res. 2003;17(9):1073–5. Epub 2003/11/05. pmid:14595590
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[143] View Article

[144] PubMed/NCBI

[145] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Meneses R, Ocazionez RE, Martinez JR, Stashenko EE. Inhibitory effect of essential oils obtained from plants grown in Colombia on yellow fever virus replication in vitro. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2009;8:8. Epub 2009/03/10. pmid:19267922
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[147] View Article

[148] PubMed/NCBI

[149] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Roy S, Chaurvedi P, Chowdhary A. Evaluation of antiviral activity of essential oil of Trachyspermum Ammi against Japanese encephalitis virus. Pharmacognosy Res. 2015;7(3):263–7. Epub 2015/07/02. pmid:26130938
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[151] View Article

[152] PubMed/NCBI

[153] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Assi M, Thon-Hon VG, Jaffar-Bandjee MC, Martinez A, Gasque P. Regulation of type I-interferon responses in the human epidermal melanocyte cell line SKMEL infected by the Ross River alphavirus. Cytokine. 2015;76(2):572–6. Epub 2015/07/15. pmid:26159111
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[155] View Article

[156] PubMed/NCBI

[157] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Astani A, Reichling J, Schnitzler P. Comparative study on the antiviral activity of selected monoterpenes derived from essential oils. Phytother Res. 2010;24(5):673–9. Epub 2009/08/05. pmid:19653195
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] PubMed/NCBI

[161] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Astani A, Reichling J, Schnitzler P. Screening for antiviral activities of isolated compounds from essential oils. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:253643. Epub 2009/12/17. pmid:20008902
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[163] View Article

[164] PubMed/NCBI

[165] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Astani A, Schnitzler P. Antiviral activity of monoterpenes beta-pinene and limonene against herpes simplex virus in vitro. Iran J Microbiol. 2014;6(3):149–55. Epub 2015/04/15. pmid:25870747
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[167] View Article

[168] PubMed/NCBI

[169] Google Scholar

Abstract

Background

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Figures

Introduction

Materials and methods

Plant material

Essential oil isolation and analysis

Cell culture

Cytotoxicity assay

Virus strains

Plaque reduction assay

Cytoprotective effect of the essential oils against RRV-T48

Virucidal activity of the essential oils against RRV-T48 and entry assay

RRV-renLuc reporter assay

Time-of-addition assay

Statistical analysis

Results

Chemical composition and cytotoxicity of essential oils

Cytoprotective effect of the essential oils against RRV-T48

Virucidal activity of essential oils against RRV-T48 and entry assay

Inhibition of RRV-renLuc replication by the essential oils

Discussion

Conclusion

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Determination of essential oils cytotoxicity on HEK293T.

S1 Table. Chemical composition of the leaf Cymbopogon citratus (CC) essential oil from Reunion Island, area percentage mean ± standard deviation (n = 9).

S2 Table. Chemical composition of the leaf Pelargonium graveolens (PG) essential oil from Reunion Island, area percentage mean ± standard deviation (n = 9).

S3 Table. Chemical composition of the roots Vetiveria zizanioides (ZV) essential oil from Reunion Island, area percentage mean ± standard deviation (n = 6).

Acknowledgments

References

Cookie Preference Center

Customize Your Cookie Preference