Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

A New Species of Frog (Anura: Dicroglossidae) Discovered from the Mega City of Dhaka


We describe a new species of frog of the genus Zakerana discovered from the urban core of Dhaka, Bangladesh, one of the most densely populated cities in the world. Although the new species is morphologically similar to the geographically proximate congeners in the Bangladeshi cricket frog group, we show that it can be distinguished from all congeners on the basis of morphological characters, advertisement calls and variation in two mitochondrial DNA genes (12S rRNA and 16S rRNA). Apart from several diagnostic differences in body proportions, the new species differs from other Zakerana species in having a flattened snout (from ventral view) projecting over the lower jaw, and diagnostic trapezoid-shaped red markings on the vocal sac in males. Molecular genetic analyses show that the new species is highly divergent (3.1–20.1% sequence divergence) from all congeneric species, and forms a well-supported clade with its sister species, Zakerana asmati. The discovery of a new amphibian species from the urban core of Dhaka together with several recent descriptions of new amphibian species from Bangladesh may indicate that more amphibian species remain to be discovered from this country.


The rapid expansion of human activities, including urbanization, is widely recognized as a threat to local biodiversity (e.g., [14]). Habitat loss and fragmentation have reduced population sizes and led to extinctions of many amphibian species in anthropogenically altered landscapes (e.g., [59]). In fact, modern agricultural and forest management threatens over one-third of the world’s known amphibian species [10], and amphibian populations are facing severe persistence problems especially in mega cities [1115].

The amphibian genus Zakerana is comprised of 20 recognized species [16,17]. After reviewing all previous studies and available morphological data (e.g., [1833]), Howlader [34] reported five geographically proximate species of Zakerana from Bangladesh (viz. Z. nepalensis, Z. pierrei, Z. syhadrensis, Z. teraiensis [also distributed in India and Nepal] and Z. asmati). In the present paper we describe a new species of Zakerana from the urban core of Dhaka (the capital of Bangladesh), one of the most densely populated mega cities in the world [35]. While the new species is morphologically similar to the above-mentioned five congeners, we show that it can be distinguished on the basis of significant differences in morphology, bioacoustics, and genetic variability in two mitochondrial genes (16S and 12S rRNA). Given that Dhaka continues to grow and develop seemingly without any particular attention to the loss and degradation of its wetland ecosystems [36,37], we hope that the discovery and description of a new frog species from its urban core would evoke public interest and help to facilitate survey and conservation of amphibian biodiversity in Bangladesh.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

This study was conducted with appropriate permissions (CCF letter no. 22.01.0000.101.23.2012.681 for collecting specimens, CF memo no. 22.01.0000.101.23.2012 for transport) and guidelines from the responsible authority, the Forest Department, Ministry of Forest and Environment, the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. The protocols for our collection and research were approved by the committee of the Wildlife Section of the Forest Department, Bangladesh. Collected specimens were not recognized as belonging to threatened species and they are not listed in IUCN Redlist or by CITES.

Morphological measurements and analyses

Measurements were taken with digital calipers to the nearest 0.02 mm. The 21 characters that were measured followed the definitions of Islam et al. [38] and Howlader et al. [39, 40]; their landmark definitions are depicted graphically in S1 Fig. The measurements included: SVL (distance from tip of snout to vent); HL (head length; distance from tip of snout to the back of mandible); HW (head width; maximum width of the head at the posterior margin of mandible); MN (distance from back of mandible to nostril); SL (snout length; distance from anterior corner of eye to the tip of snout); MFE (distance from back of mandible to front of the eye); MBE (distance from back of mandible to back of the eye); IN (internarial distance); IOD (interorbital distance); EN (distance from front of eyes to the nostril); NS (nostril—snout length); EL (eye width); UEW (maximum width of upper eyelid); HAL (hand length; distance from proximal end of outer palmar metacarpal tubercle to tip of third finger); FAL (forearm length; distance from corner of elbow to proximal end of outer palmar metacarpal tubercle); THIGHL (thigh length; distance from vent to knee); TL (tibia length; distance from knee to heel); TFOL (length of tarsus and foot; distance from heel to tip of fourth finger); FOL (foot length; distance from proximal end of inner metatarsal tubercle to tip of fourth finger). Webbing formula followed that of Glaw and Vences [41].

Apart from comparing ratios of different morphological traits between the new and other Zakerana species, we also performed discriminant function (DFA) and principal component analyses (PCA) to compare the new species (Zakerana sp. nov.) to its five (viz. Z. asmati, Z. nepalensis, pierrei, Z. syhadrensis, and Z. teraiensis) congeners for the 14 measurements (viz. SVL, HW, HL, SL, MBE, EN, NS, EL, IN, IOD, FAL, HAL, FOL, and TL) for which we had sufficient data. In the PCA, we extracted the two first axes, as they were the only ones with Eigenvalue > 1. Their scores were subjected to one-way ANOVA to formally compare if the mean scores differed among species. Tukey’s HSD post-hoc tests were used to examine if the mean values for the new species were significantly different from those of the other species.

Examined specimens are deposited at the Finnish Museum of Natural History, Finland (MZH), and Zoology Department, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh (MZD). Additional specimens used for morphological comparisons were examined from the collections of the Zoology Department, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh (MZD). Their accession numbers are listed in S1 Table.

DNA analyses and phylogeny

Whole genomic DNA was extracted from muscle tissue (n = 3) using a silica-based method (Ivanova et al. [42]) and stored at -20°C. PCR amplification and sequencing of all samples was done with two pairs of primers (listed in S2 Table). PCR conditions for amplification of both genes consisted of 5.72 μl of dH2O, 2 μl of 5x buffer, 0.08 μl of dNTP, 0.2 μl of Phire enzyme (Thermo Fisher) and 0.5 μl of each primer, in a total reaction volume of 10 μl. The PCR program was comprised of a preliminary denaturation step at 98°C for 30 s, followed by 34 cycles of 98°C for 10 s, 55°C for 10 s, 72°C for 30 s and final extension at 72°C for 1 min. PCR products were purified by using ExoSap IT (USB Corporation, Cleveland, OH, USA) and sequenced at the Institute for Molecular Medicine, Finland (FIMM). Sequence ambiguities were edited by eye by aligning forward and reverse reads using the Geneious 5.6.5 program [43]. Obtained sequences were deposited in GenBank; accession numbers are provided in S3 Table.

The nucleotide sequences of the 16S and 12S rRNA genes were separately aligned with available sequences of Zakerana obtained from GenBank (n = 20, S3 Table) using the default parameters in ClustalW (built into BIOEDIT [44, 45]). From these two alignment datasets, sequence divergences (uncorrected p-values) were calculated using Mega v 5.5.6 [46] with the pairwise-deletion option, in which all aligned sites except indels were used for calibration. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted both with each gene fragment separately and also combined. The combined dataset was comprised of partial 16S (407 bp) and 12S (349 bp) gene sequences, resulting in a 756 bp sequence. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using Maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference methods. The most fitting nucleotide substitution model for the combined dataset was found to be the GTR + I + G substitution model. For the ML analysis, branch support was evaluated by using 1000 bootstrap replicates [47] as implemented in Mega v 5.5.6 [46]. For the Bayesian analyses, Markov chain Monte Carlo runs were performed for one million generations with a sampling frequency of 100, as implemented in MrBayes 3.1.2 [48]. Convergence of the runs was assessed from the average split frequency of standard deviations (<0.01) and by checking the potential scale reduction factors (~ 1.0) for all model parameters. 25% of the trees were discarded as burn-in and the remaining ones were used to generate a 50% majority rule consensus tree, as well as to estimate the Bayesian posterior probabilities.

Bioacoustic analyses

Call recordings were made using a Sony Cyber-shot camera on video mode (model: DSC-W530). During the recordings, the focal male was closer to the camera than to other calling neighbours. After locating an advertising male, advertisement calls were recorded from approx. 0.4 m distance. Advertisement calls of holotypes of both the new species and Z. asmati were recorded in air temperature between 23°C and 24°C when the individuals were calling on land in their respective type localities (Fig 1). Calls of Z. asmati were recorded in front of Teacher’s Club and Guest House (22°28'13.83”N, 91°47'36.06”E), Chittagong University campus, Hathazari, Chittagong, Bangladesh on 15 May 2008. The calls of the new species were recorded in front of the Kabi Kazi Nazrul Islam Hall (23°46'15.25"N, 90°22'39.87"E), Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University campus, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka, Bangladesh on 11 June 2012.

Fig 1. Maps showing the type locality for Zakerana dhaka sp. nov. found from Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University campus, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka, Bangladesh (blue dot).

The map also shows the other locality from where the new species was encountered within Dhaka, as well as the location from where individuals with the same haplotype have been encountered (see text for details). The type locality of Zakerana asmati, a species closely related to Z. dhaka, is indicated on the map with black star. The approximate borders of the urban core of Dhaka city are delineated in grey.

Calls of the adult male (holotype) were analyzed with the acoustic software Adobe Audition 3.0 (following [49] and [50]), and compared to the described vocalizations of Zakerana species available in literature [34, 5153]. Recordings were re-sampled at 44.1 Hz and 16 bit resolution in the mono pattern and in “Waveform” extension. Frequency information was obtained through Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT, width 1024 points); the audio spectrogram was obtained at Hamming window function with 256 bands resolution. We measured dominant frequency (the frequency in call containing the greatest energy, determined from Fourier transformation), pulse repetition rate (number of pulses repeated in a defined period of time within a note; the value is provided as pules per second), number of pulses per note (total number of pulses in a note), note repetition rate (number of notes repeated in a defined period of time within a call; the value is provided as notes per second), note duration (duration of temporally uninterrupted sound element composing the call and made up of pulses), inter-note intervals (the time elapsed from the end of a note to the beginning of the next note), as described by Cocroft and Ryan [54], Köhler [55], and Martins and Jim [56]. Mean, standard deviation and range (as well as number of analysed units, n), of call parameters with temporal measurements in seconds (s) or milliseconds (ms) are provided. Mann Whitney U-tests were used to determine if there are differences in call parameters between the new species and the phylogenetically closely related Z. asmati.

Statistical analyses were performed using R software 3.0.1 (The R Project for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Nomenclatural acts

The electronic edition of this article conforms to the requirements of the amended International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, and hence the new names contained herein are available under that Code from the electronic edition of this article. This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for the ICZN. The ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers) can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the prefix "". The LSID for this publication is: The electronic edition of this work was published in a journal with an ISSN, and has been archived and is available from the following digital repositories: PubMed Central, LOCKSS.


Taxonomic treatment

Amphibia, Linnaeus, 1758

Anura Fischer von Waldheim, 1813

Dicroglossidae Anderson, 1871

Dicroglossinae Anderson, 1871

Zakerana Howlader, 2011

Zakerana dhaka sp. nov.


The species name derives from the name of the type locality, Dhaka city, from where the type specimens were collected. The specific epithet is treated as a noun in apposition.


Adult male, MZH-3371, collected in front of Kabi Kazi Nazrul Islam Hall (23°46'15.25"N, 90°22'39.87"E), Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University campus, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka, Bangladesh; collected by M. S. A. Howlader, June 11, 2012.

Paratopotypes (n = 11).

MZH-3372 (adult female), MZH-3373 (adult male), MZD-1031 (adult male), MZD-1032 (adult male), MZD-1033 (adult male), MZD-1034 (adult male), MZD-1035 (adult male), MZD-1036 (adult male), MZD-1037 (adult male), MZD-1038 (adult female), and MZD-1039 (adult female). All specimens were collected from the same locality as the holotype on June 10, 2012 and May 21, 2013 by M. S. A. Howlader, N. Ahsan and R. Tapu.


The species is assigned to the genus Zakerana by having small body size, pointed snout, relatively small tympanum, small inner metatarsal tubercle, rudimentary webbing on feet, “Fejervaryan” line on both sides of belly, and by its phylogenetic positioning in molecular analyses. Zakerana dhaka sp. nov. differs from its congeners occurring in Bangladesh as follows (Table 1, S4 Table): trapezoid-shaped fleshy red vocal sac markings on throat in males (vs. butterfly shaped in Z. asmati; laterally dark and medially pale in both Z. nepalensis and Z. pierrei; crescent shaped in Z. syhadrensis; “W” shaped in Z. teraiensis); forearm length 52–58% of hand length (vs. forearm length 70–96% of hand length in Z. asmati, Z. nepalensis, and Z. pierrei; forearm length equal to hand length in both Z. syhadrensis and Z. teraiensis); relative length of fingers: 2 < 4 < 1 < 3 (vs. relative length of fingers: 2 = 4 < 1 < 3 in both Z. pierrei and Z. teraiensis; 2 < 1 < 4 < 3 in Z. nepalensis; 1 = 2 < 4 < 3 in Z. syhadrensis; but similar in Z. asmati); foot length 81–86% of tibia length (vs. foot length is equal or nearly equal to tibia length in Z. asmati, Z. nepalensis, Z. pierrei, Z. syhadrensis, and Z. teraiensis); internarial distance 1.58–1.73 times greater than distance from nostril to snout tip (vs. < 1.5 times in Z. asmati, Z. nepalensis, and Z. syhadrensis; approximately equal in Z. pierrei and Z. teraiensis). Interorbital distance 62–68% of internarial distance in male (vs. 73–95% in Z. asmati, Z. nepalensis, Z. pierrei, Z. syhadrensis, and Z. teraiensis). Moreover, Z. dhaka sp. nov. differs distinctly from closely related Z. asmati in having a flattened snout which projects over the lower jaw (vs. rounded snout not much projected over lower jaw in Z. asmati) in a ventral view (Fig 2).

Table 1. Summary of quantitative and qualitative diagnostic characters in Zakerana dhaka sp. nov. and its closest congeners. Morphological ratios given as mean (± S.D.) over range.

Fig 2. Photographs of ventral view of snout in (A) Zakerana dhaka sp. nov. and (B) Zakerana asmati.

Z. dhaka sp. nov. can be further distinguished from Z. asmati, Z. pierrei, and Z. teraiensis by the following additional criteria: distance from anterior margin of eye to the nostril is 1.20–1.29 times greater than distance from nostril to snout tip (vs. 1.66–1.77 in Z. asmati; and 1.03–1.18 in Z. pierrei and Z. teraiensis); snout length 38–40% of head length (vs. snout length 40–51% of length in Z. asmati, Z. pierrei, Z. syhadrensis, and Z. teraiensis); middorsal line is narrow and distinct (vs. distinct but very wide all the way from snout to vent in Z. pierrei, absent in Z. syhadrensis, present or absent in Z. teraiensis); two red spots found on the middorsal line and additional two red spots on each of the forelimbs are usually present in males (none of the other species, except for Z. asmati, has these spots).

Formal multivariate analyses supported the inference based on the comparisons above: DFA of 14 morphometric traits identified Z. dhaka sp. nov. as clearly different from the other species (Fig 3A). Likewise, PCA showed that while Z. dhaka sp. nov. exhibited intermediate values on the first PCA-axis that were not significantly different from Z. asmati and Z. pierrei (Tukey’s HSD, p > 0.05), it was clearly distinct from all other species along the second axis (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05; Fig 3B). Close inspection of the matrix loadings revealed that the first axis was a general size factor (S5 Table) with all traits loading strongly and positively, and the second axis captured shape differences mainly attributable to effects of traits HAL and IOD, but to some degree also to those of TL, MBE, EL and EN (S5 Table).

Fig 3. Results of the multivariate analyses of morphometric variability in Zakerana dhaka sp. nov., Z. asmati, Z. pierrei, Z. nepalensis, Z. syhadrensis, and Z. teraiensis.

(A) Discriminant function and (B) principal component analyses of the data.

We compared the advertisement call of Z. dhaka with call of Z. asmati, the most closely related species to Z. dhaka ([34]; Fig 4) recorded at the same temperature. Both calls present similarities but differ in two parameters: Z. asmati has a greater duration of inter-note intervals than Z. dhaka (W = 550; p = 0.001; Z. asmati, x = 56.25 ± 12.63, n = 4; Z. dhaka, x = 32.4 ± 6.7, n = 140) and shows a significantly different dominant frequency (W = 458; p < 0.05, Fig 4; Z. asmati: 4100–5100 Hz; Z. dhaka: 2600–3800 Hz). The two species do not differ in their note duration (W = 455; p = 0.93; Z. asmati: 17–134 ms; Z. dhaka: 61–144 ms) and number of pulses per note (W = 672, p = 0.11; Z. asmati, x = 16.8 ± 1.3, n = 5; Z. dhaka, x = 14.5 ± 3.2, n = 190).

Fig 4. Waveforms of (A) Zakerana dhaka sp. nov. and (B) Zakerana asmati advertisement calls.

Relative amplitudes were roughly similar between the two species.

According to the original advertisement call descriptions of Z. nepalensis, Z. pierrei, Z. teraiensis [5153], and Z. syhadrensis [53], Z. dhaka is significantly different in various call properties. The average pulse repetition rate in Z. dhaka was 144.5 ± 4.2 pulses/s (n = 8) [vs. 76.4 (n = 1) pulses/s in Z. pierrei, 199.7 ± 8.8 (n = 28) pulses/s in Z. syhadrensis, 74.8 pulses/s (n = 1) in Z. teraiensis], average number of pulses per note was 14.5 ± 3.2 (n = 190) [vs. 58.2 ± 2.8 (n = 5) in Z. nepalensis, 19.7 ± 1.9 (n = 9) in Z. pierrei, 5.3 ± 0.5 (n = 9) in Z. teraiensis], note repetition rate was about 5.7–6.6/s [vs. 1.3–2.2 /s in Z. nepalensis, 2.8–3.2 in Z. pierrei, 9.1–9.3 in Z. syhadrensis, 2.8–3.6 in Z. teraiensis], duration of notes lasted between 0.061 to 0.144 s [vs. 0.164 to 0.406 in Z. nepalensis and Z. pierrei], inter-note intervals ranged from 0.018 to 0.05 s [vs. 0.158 to 0.505 s in Z. nepalensis and Z. teraiensis, 0.072 to 0.274 in Z. pierrei].

Zakerana dhaka sp. nov. can be distinguished from other south Asian species of Zakerana (15 species) by the following characters (Table 2): relative finger length is 2 < 4 < 1 < 3 (vs. no other south Asian species have this character except Z. mysorensis), head is longer than wide (vs. head is wider than long in Z. brevipalmata, Z. caperata, Z. granosa, Z. greenii, Z. keralensis, Z. kudremukhensis, Z. mudduraja, Z. mysorensis, Z. nilagirica, Z. rufescens, and Z. sengupti), having a distinct outer metatarsal tubercle (vs. outer metatarsal tubercle indistinct in Z. brevipalmata, Z. greenii, and Z. parambikulamana), interorbital distance is less than maximum width of upper eyelid (vs. maximum width of upper eyelid is greater than interorbital distance in both Z. kirtisinghei and Z. sauriceps), IOD 74% of UEW [vs. IOD is equal or more than 90% of UEW in Z. caperata (n = 35), Z. granosa (n = 33) and Z. kudremukhensis (n = 22); IOD is 83% of UEW in Z. nilagirica (n = 10); IOD is above 50% of UEW in Z. keralensis (n = 10) and Z. rufescens (n = 13); IOD is above 60% of UEW in Z. brevipalmata (n = 9), Z. mudduraja (n = 12), Z. parambikulamana (n = 1) and Z. sengupti (n = 5); IOD is 40% of UEW in Z. sauriceps (n = 1)], nostril—snout length is greater than distance from front of eyes to the nostril (vs. distance from front of eyes to the nostril is equal or greater than nostril—snout length in Z. brevipalmata, Z. greenii, Z. nilagirica, Z. parambikulamana, Z. rufescens, and Z. sengupti), NS 78% of EN [vs. NS is more than 90% of EN in Z. caperata (n = 35), Z. granosa (n = 33), Z. kudremukhensis (n = 22), and Z. keralensis (n = 10)], IOD 64% of IN [vs. IOD is equal of IN in both of Z. mysorensis and Z. sauriceps; IOD is more than 80% of IN in both Z. caperata (n = 35) and Z. granosa (n = 33); IOD is half of IN in Z. rufescens; IOD is above or more than 74% of IN in Z. kudremukhensis (n = 22), Z. nilagirica (n = 10) and Z. sengupti (n = 5)], HAL 46% of SVL (vs. HAL is above or less than 25% of SVL in other known south Asian species; Table 2), tibia length is more than half of SVL (vs. tibia length is half or less than half of SVL in Z. brevipalmata, Z. caperata, Z. mudduraja, Z. parambikulamana, Z. rufescens, and Z. sauriceps), there is no pit behind the snout tip (vs. pit is present in Z. sauriceps), reduced webbing between toes (vs. developed webbing present between toes in Z. brevipalmata, Z. greenii, Z. keralensis, Z. kirtisinghei, Z. mysorensis, and Z. sauriceps). Pillai [28] diagnosed Z. murthii (as Rana murthii) with the most diagnostic feature of this species being the presence of two triangular patches bearing pearl-like papillae on the breast in males, and also the presence of the papillae in the anterior part of the lower jaw. We, however, could not find such papillae in the new species.

Table 2. A comparison of Zakerana dhaka sp. nov. with its congeners found in south Asia (except Bangladesh).

M = matched with the character; NM = not matched with the character; “---” = data not available.

Description of the holotype (adult male)

Small sized frog (SVL 30.46 mm). Head large, triangular, longer than wide, HW 96% of HL, HW 35% of SVL, HL 36% of SVL, MFE 67% of HL, MBE 25% of HL. Snout flattened from ventral view, snout projected over lower jaw, SL 40% of HL; canthus rostralis indistinct, loreal region concave. Nostrils much closer to snout tip than to eyes, NS 78% of EN; NS 6% of SVL, EN 7% of SVL; nostrils rounded and very small, NS 63% of IN, MN 84% of HL. Eye large, EL 42% of HL, EL 15% of SVL; maximum width of upper eyelid greater than interorbital distance, IOD 74% of UEW, UEW 52% of EL, UEW 8% of SVL. Interorbital space convex, IOD 64% of IN. Tympanum round, TD 43% of EL.

Arms moderately long, robust, FAL 55% of HAL, FAL 25% of SVL, HAL 46% of SVL. Fingers small, free of webbing, tips rounded. Relative length of fingers, 2 < 4 <1 < 3; tips of fingers bluntly rounded; fingers lacking dermal ridge. Subarticular tubercles prominent, rounded, a single tubercle per digit; supernumerary tubercles absent; two oval shaped, distinct palmar tubercles.

Hind limbs relatively long, TL 65% of SVL, THIGHL 85% of TL; FOL 54% of SVL and FOL 84% of TL, FOL 66% of TFOL. Toes long, thin, tips rounded; webbing between toes weakly developed [1(1), 2i (1.5), 2e (0.5), 3i (2), 3e (1), 4i (2), 4e (2.5), 5 (0.75)]. Relative lengths of toes, 1 < 2 < 5 < 3 < 4; a weak, indistinct fringe of skin on outer side of toe 5. Inner metatarsal tubercle elongated, present at base of toe 1; outer metatarsal tubercle is oval, minute, distinct; subarticular tubercles well-developed, nearly oval. Dorsal surface of body smooth, tubercles present, arranged in row or reticulated pattern; tiny granules on upper eyelids, loreal, and cloacal region (Fig 5). Dorsal surface of forelimbs, thigh and tarsus glandular. Throat, chest, abdomen and ventral part of thigh and tibia smooth.

Fig 5. Photographs of Zakerana dhaka sp. nov.

(A & B) Dorso-lateral view of male (holotype, live), (C) ventral view, ventral view of (D) hand and (E) foot.

Coloration in life.

Basic color of dorsal surface olive green with a few dark irregular spots fused into transverse bands; spots are formed by tubercle arrangement on dorsal side; sides of the body marbled brown. A narrow mid-dorsal line present from vent up to the posterior of eyes. Two red spots are found on the mid-dorsal line. Two additional red spots are present on each of the forelimbs. Toe webbings faintly marbled. Forelimbs with dark transverse bands; hind limbs with pigmented spots on thighs and stripes on lower legs. Ventral surface immaculate.

Coloration in preservative.

In preservative, general color pattern remained unaffected, but colors faded. Olive green surfaces became whitish brown. Mid-dorsal line and forelimbs lost their red spots.

Measurements (in mm).

Male (holotype): SVL 30.46; HL11.06; HW 10.67; MN 9.35; SL 4.42; MFE 7.37; MBE 2.77; IN 2.84; IOD 1.81; EN 2.29; NS 1.79; EL 4.63; UEW 2.43; TD 2.01; HAL 13.90; FAL 7.61; LAL 6.73; THIGHL 16.85; TL 19.72; TFOL 24.85; FOL 16.55. Female (paratopotype; MZH-3372): SVL 37.48; HL 12.61; HW 11.88; MN 10.43; SL 4.79; MFE 8.39; MBE 2.81; IN 3. 55; IOD 2.40; EN 2.62; NS 2.05; EL 5.24; UEW 3.25; TD 2.41; HAL 16.87; FAL 9.20; LAL 7.98; THIGHL 20.40; TL 24.29; TFOL31.52; FOL 19.86.

Variation in paratopotypes.

Accession numbers and morphometric variability are shown in Table 1 and S4 Table. One specimen lacked a mid-dorsal line (male MZH-3372). Female (MZH-3373) had no vocal sac markings and lacked red spots. In regard to coloration in life and preservative, the descriptions of the holotype apply: there was little variation among individuals in the type series.


Zakerana dhaka is thus far known only from Dhaka, Bangladesh, from the type locality and Curzon Hall (23°43'34.67"N, 90°24'4.91"E) situated 5.6 km from the type locality (Fig 1). However, the species also seems to be present in areas adjacent to Dhaka city, such as Mymenshing district (Fig 1) from where two unidentified specimens with haplotypes similar to that of the new species have been reported [38,57]. In comparison, the map (Fig 1) also shows the localities from where the species Z. asmati has reported.

Natural history.

The new species was observed only at night in the rain. At the type locality, specimens were found in or around temporary pools located in a grass field. In the Curzon Hall site, the species was found in an unused sewage canal of a building. Hence, the new species seems to be resistant to urban disturbance by occupying small habitat patches in different places that are subject to human commotion.

Advertisement call.

Advertisement calls from one male (calling on land) were recorded on June 11, 2012, in Sher-e-Bangla Nagar (Dhaka, Bangladesh) at 22:35 in air temperature of 23°C. They consisted of short chirping notes of variable duration (Fig 6). These note duration lasted between 61 to 144 ms (x = 104.2±22.5, n = 192) and were emitted singly or repeated at irregular intervals, or in short series of 2 to 16 notes (x = 4.8 ± 2.97, n = 37). Notes were arranged in series, and inter-note intervals ranged from 18 to 50 ms (x = 32.4 ± 6.7, n = 140), with intervals between two series ranging from 113 to 350 ms (x = 189.2 ± 51.5, n = 29). The number of pulses per note varied from 8 to 20 (x = 14.5 ± 3.2, n = 190) and the average pulse repetition rate was 144.5 ± 4.2 pulses/s (n = 8). The average note repetition rate was 5.7 notes/s (range: 4.6–7.7 notes/s). The call frequency ranged from 2500 to 4700 Hz with a dominant frequency lying between 2600 and 3800 Hz (Fig 6).

Fig 6. Advertisement call of Zakerana dhaka sp. nov.

(A) Spectrogram and (B) waveform of an advertisement call. (C) A detailed image of the waveform of the second note from (B).

Molecular phylogenetic positioning of the new species.

Maximum-likelihood and Bayesian posterior probability methods resulted in similar phylogenetic trees with a strongly supported clade for Z. dhaka (Fig 7). The new species also showed high genetic divergence from all other congeners of the genus Zakerana. The sequence divergences between Z. dhaka sp. nov. and other species were significant, ranging from 5–20.1% for 12S rRNA, and from 3.1–17.3% for 16S rRNA (Table 3). The intraspecific divergence was low for both genes. A sister relationship between Z. dhaka sp. nov. and Z. asmati was supported by robust bootstrap values and high posterior probabilities (Fig 7).

Table 3. Pairwise genetic divergences among Zakerana species.

Lower diagonal: 16S rRNA divergence. Upper diagonal: 12S rRNA divergence.

Fig 7. Phylogenetic relationships among species in the genus Zakerana.

Analysis is based on 756 bp mtDNA (16S and 12S) gene sequences. Numbers on branches represent bootstrap support for Maximum-likelihood, and Bayesian posterior probability.


During the course of this study we observed the destruction of species habitats resulting from construction of buildings and roads. Additionally, we observed water pollution, at least partially related to garbage dumping by the Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University and Medical Hospital. In particular, expansion of human settlements and road constructions are increasing in Dhaka, and may cause risks to the new species. Further notes on conservation status would require a more through censuses to document the actual distribution range of this species outside of Dhaka city.


Most species in the genera Zakerana and Fejervarya are morphologically very similar to one another and until recently, were considered to form a single genus “Fejervarya” ([16,17,58]. However, evidence from morphological and genetic analyses indicates the existence of two genera [16,17, 5961]. The new species described in this study belongs to the genus Zakerana, and can be distinguished from all other known species in this genus on the basis of morphological and genetic characteristics. Although sequence divergence as such has been considered to be a reliable marker for amphibian species identification (e.g., [6264]), morphological comparisons were also performed to support the genetic inference. However, consistent with earlier reports [34,65,66], the morphological divergence among species was mainly restricted to differences in body proportions. Hence, this together with the minor interest towards amphibian biology in Bangladesh, may explain why Z. dhaka has gone unrecognized as a distinct species in the middle of a mega city.

Although the genetic divergence between Z. dhaka and Z. asmati was not very high (5% for 12S rRNA, and 3.1% for 16S rRNA), it exceeded the conventional threshold value of 3% considered to be indicative of species level diverge in amphibians (e.g. [6770]). In fact, low genetic divergence in conserved 16S rRNA gene sequence; comparable to the present study, have also been reported in many other anuran species which show distinct morphological and bioacoustic differences (e.g. [7178]). Apart from the genetic differentiation, the fact that we found clear-cut morphometric (both quantitative and qualitative) and acoustic divergence between Z. dhaka and Z. asmati strongly suggest that they are distinct species. However, given that acoustic analyses were based on very limited material (calls of one Z. dhaka male), the strongest evidence for the species status of Z. dhaka comes from genetic and morphological data.

Interestingly, haplotype similar to that of the new species (Z. dhaka) described here has been earlier reported by Islam et al. [38], and Hasan et al. [57] from Mymensingh of Bangladesh (Figs 1 and 8). Both Islam et al. [38] and Hasan et al. [57] identified this haplotype as “medium type Fejervarya”. Although Islam et al. [38] performed phylogenetic and morphological comparisons—and even crossing experiments among four haplotypes (viz. large, mangrove, medium, and small types [38])–to other species from the genera Fejervarya and Zakerana, these comparisons did not include the sister species Z. asmati. Islam et al. [38] ended up designating this haplotype (GenBank accession: AB372011; Fig 8) as “Bangladesh medium type”, and suggesting that only further morphological, acoustic, and genetic investigations can confirm its species status. Later on, Hasan et al. [57] reported that this haplotype (“Fejervarya sp. medium”) could be a new species, though no morphological or bioacoustics analyses were reported. Our detailed phylogenetic, morphological and bioacoustics analyses bring clarity to this debate, suggesting that the haplotype first described by Islam et al. [38] is in fact a new species, Z. dhaka.

Fig 8. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on variation in 16S gene fragment showing the position of Zakerana dhaka sp. nov. in relation to other two available haplotypes from the GenBank matched with the new species.

GenBank accession numbers and locality information given after the scientific names.

Amphibians are now recognized to be the most threatened class of vertebrates [79]. Habitat loss has been identified as one of the major threats for 45% of rapidly declining amphibian species around the world [80]. Nevertheless, in the midst of these declines, the number of new amphibian species described during the past decade has been increasing (e.g. [81,82]), even from areas subject to a long history of studies in amphibian biology and systematics (e.g. [14,15]). Unfortunately, there has been a general lack of interest in amphibian taxonomy, systematics and diversity in Bangladesh during the entire 20th century, possibly due to political instability, which has not nurtured interest in these types of activities. In fact, the last new amphibian species from Dhaka before the one described in this paper was reported almost 150 years ago [83]. To meet the demands of a large and growing human population, 2.1% of the country’s forests are disappearing annually [84], and more than half of the green areas and water bodies of Dhaka city have disappeared within the past 50 years [85,86]. Although the Zakerana species may be tolerant towards urbanization, it remains unclear how many amphibian species and populations have been lost due to these developments. If the present study is indicative of the unrecognized diversity in Bangladesh, future efforts focused on amphibian systematics and taxonomy in this country are likely to lead to the discovery of many new species, as also indicated by recent descriptions of two other new species from this country [39,40].

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. A schematic illustration of the definitions of morphological traits used in this study.

See Materials and methods for explanation of trait abbreviations. Modified from Howlader et al. [2015; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119825].


S2 Table. Primers used for PCR amplifications in the present study.


S3 Table. Gene sequence identifiers (GenBank) for materials used in this study.


S4 Table. Morphological measurements of the examined specimens of Z. dhaka sp. nov. and its congeners.

For trait abbreviations (columns) see Material and Methods, and for specimen identifiers (ID), see S1 Table.


S5 Table. Loading matrix of the PCA of Zakerana dhaka sp. nov. and its four congeners (Z. asmati, Z. pierrei, Z. nepalensis, Z. syhadrensis, and Z. teraiensis).

Factor loadings are given for the two first Eigenvectors, together with corresponding Eigenvalues and percentage of variance explained by each factor.



We thank Kirsi Kähkönen and Sami Karja for assistance in the DNA laboratory, Tapu Rayhan, Nasimul Ahsan, Pitu Masud and Abdur Razzaque for help with the field-work, GM Rosa for his help with the call analyses, and Jacquelin De Faveri for checking the English. Specimen collection and transport permits were issued by the Forest Department, the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. Funding from CIMO (Finland) and Finnish cultural foundation made this research possible.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MSAH JM AN. Performed the experiments: MSAH. Analyzed the data: MSAH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MSAH JM. Wrote the paper: MSAH JM AN. Obtained permission for collection and research from the Forest Department, Ministry of Forest and Environment, the People’s Republic of Bangladesh: MSAH.


  1. 1. Marzluff JM. Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R, editors. Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2001. pp 19–47.
  2. 2. McKinney ML. Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience. 2002; 52: 883–890.
  3. 3. Jenkins M. Prospects for Biodiversity. Science. 2003; 302: 1175–1177. pmid:14615529
  4. 4. Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, et al. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science. 2008; 319: 756–760. pmid:18258902
  5. 5. Cushman SA. Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biol Conserv. 2006; 128: 231–240.
  6. 6. Parris MK. Urban amphibian assemblages as metacommunities. J Anim Ecol. 2006; 75: 757–764. pmid:16689958
  7. 7. Pounds A, Bustamante MR, Coloma LA, Consuegra JA, Fogden MPL, Foster PN, et al. Widespread amphibian extinctions from epidemic disease driven by global warming. Nature. 2006; 439: 161–167. pmid:16407945
  8. 8. Becker CG, Fonseca CR, Haddad CFB, Batista RF, Prado PI. Habitat split and the global decline of amphibians. Science. 2007; 318: 1775–1777. pmid:18079402
  9. 9. Wearn OR, Reuman DC, Ewers RM. Extinction debt and windows of conservation opportunity in the Brazilian Amazon. Science. 2012; 337: 228–232. pmid:22798612
  10. 10. Hamer AJ, McDonnell MJ. Amphibian ecology and conservation in the urbanising world: A review. Biol Conserv. 2008; 141: 2432–2449.
  11. 11. Gibbs JP, Whiteleather KK, Schueler FW. Changes in frog and toad populations over 30 years in New York State. Ecol Appl. 2005; 15: 1148–1157.
  12. 12. Wilby RL, Perry GLW. Climate change, biodiversity and the urban environment: A critical review based on London, UK. Prog Phys Geogr. 2006; 30: 73–98.
  13. 13. Husté A, Clobert J, Miaud C. The movements and breeding site fidelity of the natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) in an urban park near Paris (France) with management recommendations. Amphibia-Reptilia. 2006; 27: 561–568.
  14. 14. Feinberg JA, Newman CE, Watkins-Colwell GJ, Schlesinger MD, Zarate B, Curry BR, et al. Cryptic diversity in metropolis: Confirmation of a new leopard frog species (Anura: Ranidae) from New York city and surrounding Atlantic coast regions. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e108213. pmid:25354068
  15. 15. Newman CE, Feinberg JA, Rissler LJ, Burger J, Shaffer HB. A new species of leopard frog (Anura: Ranidae) from the urban northeastern US. Mol Phyl Evol. 2012; 63: 445–455.
  16. 16. Howlader MSA. Cricket frog (Amphibia: Anura: Dicroglossidae): two regions of Asia are corresponding two groups. Bonnoprani- Bangladesh Wildlife Bulletin. 2011; 5: 1–7.
  17. 17. Frost DR [Internet] Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference, Version 6.0.–[cited 2014 Jan 28]. Available: http://researchamnhorg/vz/herpetology/amphibia/.
  18. 18. Borthakur R, Kalita J, Hussain B, Sengupta S. Study on the Fejervarya (Anura: Dicroglossidae) species of Assam. Zoos’ Print Journal. 2007; 22: 2639–2643.
  19. 19. Boulenger GA. A monograph of the South Asian, Papuan, Melanesian, and Australian frogs of the genus Rana. Records of the Indian Museum. 1920; 20: 1–126.
  20. 20. Boulenger GA. Description of a frog from Ceylon, hitherto confounded with Rana limnocharis. Spolia Zeylanica. 1905; 2: 73–74.
  21. 21. Boulenger GA. The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Reptilia and Batrachia. London: Taylor and Francis; 1890. pp 448–451.
  22. 22. Chanda SK. Handbook -Indian amphibians. Kolkata: Zoological Survey of India; 2002. pp 93–144.
  23. 23. Djong HT, Matsui M, Kuramoto M, Nishioka M, Sumida M. A new species of the Fejervarya limnocharis complex from Japan (Anura, Dicroglossidae). Zool Sci. 2011; 28: 922–929. pmid:22132790
  24. 24. Dutta SK. A new species of Limnonectes (Anura: Ranidae) from Orissa, India. Hamadryad. 1997; 22: 1–8.
  25. 25. Dutta SK, Manamendra-Arachchi K. Amphibian Fauna of Sri Lanka. Colombo: Wildlife Heritage Trust of Sri Lanka; 1996. pp 83–91.
  26. 26. Kuramoto M, Joshy SH, Kurabayashi A, Sumida M. The genus Fejervarya (Anura: Ranidae) in Central Western Ghats, India, with description of four new cryptic species. Curr Herpetol. 2007; 26: 81–105.
  27. 27. Manamendra-Arachchi K, Gabadage D. Limnonectes kirtisinghei, a new species of ranid frog from Sri Lanka. Journal of South Asian Natural History. 1996; 2: 31–42.
  28. 28. Pillai RS. A new species of Rana (family Ranidae) from Western Ghats, S. India. Bulletin-Zoological Survey of India. 1979; 2: 39–42.
  29. 29. Purkayastha J, Matsui M. A New Species of Fejervarya (Anura: Dicroglossidae) from Mawphlang, Northeastern India. Asian Herpetol Res. 2012; 3: 31–37.
  30. 30. Rao CRN. Notes on Batrachia. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society. 1922; 28: 439–447.
  31. 31. Rao CRN. On some new forms of Batrachia from S. India. Proceedings of the Indian Academy Science. 1937; 6: 387–427.
  32. 32. Rasel MSR, Hannan MA, Howlader MSA. Four new country records of Fejervarya Bolkay, 1915 (Amphibian: Anura: Dicroglossidae) from Bangladesh. Bonnoprani-Bangladesh Wildlife Bulletin. 2007; 4: 1–3.
  33. 33. Jerdon TC. Catalogue of reptiles inhabiting the Peninsula of India. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. 1854; 22: 522–534.
  34. 34. Howlader MSA. A new species of Fejervarya (Anura: Dicroglossidae) from Bangladesh. Zootaxa. 2011; 2761: 41–50.
  35. 35. Demographia. Demographia world urban areas, 11th Annual Edition; 2015. Preprint. Available: Accessed 3rd March, 2015.
  36. 36. Dewan AM, Yamaguchi Y. Using remote sensing and GIS to detect and monitor land use and land cover change in Dhaka Metropolitan of Bangladesh during 1960–2005. Environ Monit Assess. 2009; 150: 237–249. pmid:18317939
  37. 37. Dewan AM, Yamaguchi Y, Rahman MZ. Dynamics of land use/cover changes and the analysis of landscape fragmentation in Dhaka Metropolitan, Bangladesh. Geo Journal. 2012; 77: 315–330.
  38. 38. Islam MM, Kurose N, Khan MMR, Nishizawa T, Kuramoto M, Alam MS, et al. Genetic divergence and reproductive isolation in the genus Fejervarya (Amphibia: Anura) from Bangladesh inferred from morphological observation, crossing experiments, and molecular analyses. Zool Sci. 2008; 25: 1084–1105. pmid:19267620
  39. 39. Howlader MSA, Nair A, Gopalan SV, Merilä J. A New Species of Microhyla (Anura: Microhylidae) from Nilphamari, Bangladesh. PLoS One. 2015; 10(3): e0119825. pmid:25806804
  40. 40. Howlader MSA, Nair A, Gopalan SV, Merilä J. A New Species of Euphlyctis (Anura: Dicroglossidae) from Barisal, Bangladesh. PLoS One. 2015; 10(2): e0116666. pmid:25651541
  41. 41. Glaw F, Vences M. A field guide to the amphibians and reptiles of Madagascar. 3rd ed. Kӧln, Germany: M. Vences & F. Glaw Verlags GbR; 2007. 496 pp.
  42. 42. Ivanova NV, deWaard JR, Hebert PDN. An inexpensive, automation-friendly protocol for recovering high-quality DNA. Mol Ecol Notes. 2006; 6: 998–1002.
  43. 43. Drummond AJ, Ashton B, Buxton S, Cheung M, Cooper A, Duran C, et al. [Internet] Geneious v5.0.4.–[cited 2013 Jan 24]. Available:
  44. 44. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1999; 41: 95–98.
  45. 45. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994; 22: 4673–4680. pmid:7984417
  46. 46. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011; 28: 2731–2739. pmid:21546353
  47. 47. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies, an approach using bootstrap. Evolution. 1985; 39: 783–791.
  48. 48. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19: 1572–1574. pmid:12912839
  49. 49. Rosa GM, Andreone F. Bioacoustic data of the recently described Boophis calcaratus (Anura: Mantellidae: Boophinae), a cryptic tree frog from Eastern Madagascar. Zootaxa. 2010; 2426: 61–64.
  50. 50. Rosa GM, Noël J, Andreone F. The advertisement call of Mantidactylus aerumnalis (Anura: Mantellidae), a terrestrial frog from the east coast of Madagascar. Salamandra. 2010; 46(2): 98–100.
  51. 51. Dubois A. Une nouveau complexe d’espèces jumelles distinguées par le chant: les grenouilles de Népal voisines de Rana limnocharis Boie (Amphibienes, Anoures). Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences. 1975; 281: 1717–1720.
  52. 52. Dubois A. Note preliminaire sur le groupe de Rana limnocharis Gravenhorst, 1829 (Amphibiens, Anoures). Alytes. 1984; 3: 143–159.
  53. 53. Grosjean S, Dubois A. Description of the advertisement calls of nine species of Fejervarya Bolkay, 1915 and Minervarya Dubois, Ohler and Biju, 2001 from China, India and Nepal. Alytes. 2011; 27: 117–141.
  54. 54. Cocroft RB, Ryan MJ. Patterns of advertisement call evolution in toads and chorus frogs. Anim Behav. 1995; 49: 283–303.
  55. 55. Köhler J. Amphibian diversity in Bolivia: a study with special reference to montane forest regions. Bonner Zoologische Monographien. 2000; 48: 1–243.
  56. 56. Martins IA, Jim J. Bioacoustic analysis of advertisement call in Dendropsophus nanus and Hyla sanborni (Anura, Hylidae) in Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology. 2003; 63: 507–516.
  57. 57. Hasan M, Islam MM, Khan MMR, Alam MS, Kurabayashi A, Igawa T, et al. Cryptic anuran biodiversity in Bangladesh revealed by mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene sequences. Zoolog Sci. 2012; 29: 162–172. pmid:22379983
  58. 58. IUCN [Internet] The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, Version 2014.3.–[cited 2014 Mar 20]. Available:
  59. 59. Frost DR, Grant T, Faivovich J, Bain RH, Haas A, Haddad CFB, et al. The amphibian tree of life. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist. 2006; 297: 1–370.
  60. 60. Kotaki M, Kurabayashi A, Matsui M, Khonsue W, Djong TH, Tandon M, et al. Genetic divergences and phylogenetic relationships among the Fejervarya limnocharis complex in Thailand and neighboring countries revealed by mitochondrial and nuclear genes. Zool Sci. 2008; 25: 381–390. pmid:18459820
  61. 61. Kotaki M, Kurabayashi A, Matsui M, Kuramoto M, Djong TH, Sumida M. Molecular phylogeny of the diversified frogs of genus Fejervarya (Anura: Dicroglossidae). Zool Sci. 2010; 27: 386–395. pmid:20443685
  62. 62. Vences M, Thomas M, Meijen AVD, Chiari Y, Vieites DR. Comparative performance of the 16S rRNA gene in DNA barcoding of amphibians. Front Zool. 2005; 2(1): 5. pmid:15771783
  63. 63. Vences M, Wake DB. Speciation, species boundaries and phylogeography of amphibians. Amphib Biol. 2007; 7: 2613–71.
  64. 64. Fouquet A, Gilles A, Vences M, Marty C, Blance M, Gemmel NJ. Underestimation of species richness in neotropical frogs revealed by mtDNA analysis. PLoS One. 2007; 2: e1109. pmid:17971872
  65. 65. Veith M, Kosuch J, Ohler A, Dubois A. Systematics of Fejervarya limnocharis (Gravenhorst, 1829) (Amphibia, Anura, Ranidae) and related species. 2. Morphological and molecular variation in frogs from the Greater Sunda Islands (Sumatra, Java, Borneo) with the definition of two species. Alytes. 2001; 19: 5–28.
  66. 66. Djong HT, Matsui M, Kuramoto M, Daicus MB, Yong HS, Nishioka M, et al. Morphological divergence, reproductive isolation mechanisms, and molecular phylogenetic relationships among the Indonesia, Malaysia, and Japan populations of the Fejervarya limnocharis complex (Anura, Ranidae). Zool Sci. 2007; 24: 1197–1212. pmid:18271636
  67. 67. Wasonga DV, Channing A. Identification of sand frogs (Anura: Pyxicephalidae: Tomopterna) from Kenya with the description of two new species. Zootaxa. 2013; 3734: 221–240. pmid:25277908
  68. 68. Djong HT, Matsui M, Kuramoto M, Nishioka M, Sumida M. A new species of the Fejervarya limnocharis complex from Japan (Anura, Dicroglossidae). Zool Sci. 2011: 28: 922–929. pmid:22132790
  69. 69. Hasan M, Islam MM, Kuramoto M, Kurabayashi A, Sumida M. Description of two new species of Microhyla (Anura: Microhylidae) from Bangladesh. Zootaxa. 2014; 3755: 401–418. pmid:24869829
  70. 70. Hasan M, Kuramoto M, Islam MM, Alam MS, Khan MMR, Sumida M. A new species of genus Hoplobatrachus (Anura, Dicroglossidae) from the coastal belt of Bangladesh. Zootaxa. 2012; 3312: 45–48.
  71. 71. Wang Y, Zhao J, Yang J, Zhou Z, Chen G, Liu Y. Morphology, molecular genetics, and bioacoustics support two new sympatric Xenophrys toads (Amphibia: Anura: Megophryidae) in Southeast China. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e93075. pmid:24714161
  72. 72. Rowley JJ, Dau QV, Nguyen TT, Cao TT, Nguyen SV. A new species of Gracixalus (Anura: Rhacophoridae) with a hyperextended vocal repertoire from Vietnam. Zootaxa. 2011; 3125: 22–38.
  73. 73. Kuramoto M, Satou N, Oumi S, Kurabayashi A, Sumida M. Inter-and intra-island divergence in Odorrana ishikawae (Anura, Ranidae) of the Ryukyu Archipelago of Japan, with description of a new species. Zootaxa. 2011; 2767: 25–40.
  74. 74. Glos J, Glaw F, Vences M. A new species of Scaphiophryne from western Madagascar. Copeia. 2005; 2: 252–261.
  75. 75. Vences M, Glaw F, Jesu R, Schimmenti G. A new species of Heterixalus (Amphibia: Hyperoliidae) from western Madagascar. African Zoology. 2000; 35: 269–276.
  76. 76. Schick S, Zimkus BM, Channing A, Köhler J, Lötters S. Systematics of ‘Little Brown Frogs’ from East Africa: recognition of Phrynobatrachus scheffleri and description of a new species from the Kakamega Forest, Kenya (Anura: Phrynobatrachidae). Salamandra. 2010; 46: 24–36.
  77. 77. Padhye AD, Sayyed A, Jadhav A, Dahanukar N. Raorchestes ghatei, a new species of shrub frog (Anura: Rhacophoridae) from the Western Ghats of Maharashtra, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa. 2013; 5: 4913–4931.
  78. 78. Meegaskumbura M, Manamendra-Arachchi K. Description of eight new species of shrub frogs (Ranidae: Rhacophorinae: Philautus) from Sri Lanka. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology. 2005; 12: 305–338.
  79. 79. Hoffmann M, Hilton-Taylor C, Angulo A, Böhm M, Brooks TM, Butchart SHM, et al. The impact of conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates. Science. 2010; 330: 1503–1509. pmid:20978281
  80. 80. Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues AS, Fischman DL, et al. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science. 2004; 306: 1783–1786. pmid:15486254
  81. 81. Köhler J, Vieites DR, Bonett RM, HitaGarcia F, Glaw F, Steinke D, et al. New amphibians and global conservation: a boost in species discoveries in a highly endangered vertebrate group. BioScience. 2005; 55: 693–696.
  82. 82. Glaw F, Köhler J. Amphibian species diversity exceeds that of mammals. Herpetol Rev. 1998; 29: 11–12.
  83. 83. Theobald W. Catalogue of reptiles in the museum of the Asiatic society of Bengal. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. 1868; 37: 1–88.
  84. 84. Chowdhury JK. National forest policy review: Bangladesh. In: Enters T, Qiang M, Leslie RN, editors. An Overview of Forest Policies in Asia. EC-FAO Partnership Programme (2000–2002), European Commission and Food and Agriculture Organization, Bangkok, Thailand; 2003. Preprint. Available: Accessed 31 October 2012.
  85. 85. Islam MS, Rahman MR, Shahabuddin AKM, Ahmed R. Changes in wetlands in Dhaka city: trends and physico-environmental consequences. Journal of Life and Earth Science. 2010; 5: 37–42.
  86. 86. Rahman S, Hasan SMR, Islam MA, Maitra MK. Temporal change detection of vegetation coverage of Dhaka using remote sensing. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences. 2011; 2: 481–490.