Persistence of Positive Carryover Effects in the Oyster, Saccostrea glomerata, following Transgenerational Exposure to Ocean Acidification

Laura M. Parker; Wayne A. O’Connor; David A. Raftos; Hans-Otto Pörtner; Pauline M. Ross

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132276

Abstract

Ocean acidification (OA) is predicted to have widespread implications for marine organisms, yet the capacity for species to acclimate or adapt over this century remains unknown. Recent transgenerational studies have shown that for some marine species, exposure of adults to OA can facilitate positive carryover effects to their larval and juvenile offspring that help them to survive in acidifying oceanic conditions. But whether these positive carryover effects can persist into adulthood or the next generation is unknown. Here we tested whether positive carryover effects found in larvae of the oyster, Saccostrea glomerata following transgenerational exposure to elevated CO₂, could persist into adulthood and whether subsequent transgenerational exposure of adults to elevated CO₂ would facilitate similar adaptive responses in the next generation of larvae and juveniles. Following our previous transgenerational exposure of parental adults and first generation (F1) larvae to ambient (385 μatm) and elevated (856 μatm) CO₂, newly settled F1 juveniles were transferred to the field at ambient CO₂ for 14 months, until they reached reproductive maturity. At this time, the F1 adults were returned to the laboratory and the previous transgenerational CO₂ exposure was repeated to produce F2 offspring. We found that the capacity of adults to regulate extracellular pH at elevated CO₂ was improved if they had a prior history of transgenerational exposure to elevated CO₂. In addition, subsequent transgenerational exposure of these adults led to an increase in the resilience of their larval and juvenile offspring. Offspring with a history of transgenerational exposure to elevated CO₂ had a lower percentage abnormality, faster development rate, faster shell growth and increased heart rate at elevated CO₂ compared with F2 offspring with no prior history of exposure to elevated CO₂. Our results suggest that positive carryover effects originating during parental and larval exposure will be important in mediating some of the impacts of OA for later life-history stages and generations.

Citation: Parker LM, O’Connor WA, Raftos DA, Pörtner H-O, Ross PM (2015) Persistence of Positive Carryover Effects in the Oyster, Saccostrea glomerata, following Transgenerational Exposure to Ocean Acidification. PLoS ONE 10(7): e0132276. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132276

Editor: Vengatesen Thiyagarajan (Rajan), University of Hong Kong, HONG KONG

Received: February 11, 2015; Accepted: June 11, 2015; Published: July 6, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Parker et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding: This work was supported by the Australian Research Council (http://www.arc.gov.au) Grant number: DI100100158 to LMP, PMR, WAO, DAR, HOP. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Near-future ocean acidification threatens the survival of marine organisms and the ecosystems they support [1]. With atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions continuing to increase at an unprecedented rate, the likelihood of alleviation through mitigation efforts is low [2–3]. As a consequence, many marine species will need to undergo rapid acclimation or adaptation to avoid extinction [2–6]. Accordingly, we are currently seeing a shift in the focus of ocean acidification research internationally, from studies which simply measure the acute response of marine organisms to ocean acidification, most typically within a single life-history stage or single generation, to those that test for the capacity of species to acclimate or adapt to the acidifying conditions [5,7–18].

Transgenerational experiments are one area of investigation which are currently gaining considerable ground in the literature [5,10,13,16,17–18]. These experiments expose parents to elevated CO₂ during reproductive conditioning and measure how this parental exposure influences the performance of their offspring. For most species studied to date, exposure of parents to elevated CO₂ has facilitated the transfer of positive carryover effects (transgenerational effects) to larval and juvenile offspring that have helped the offspring survive in the acidified conditions [5,10,13] (but not Welch et al. [17]). For example, Miller et al. [10] found that juvenile anemone fish, Amphiprion melanopus, from parents with no previous exposure to elevated CO₂ had increased metabolic rate and decreased weight and length when exposed to elevated CO₂ of 1000 μatm. These negative effects were no longer present and in some cases were reversed, however, when their parents were also exposed to elevated CO₂.

Yet, a limitation of nearly all transgenerational experiments to date is that researchers only consider the response of an organisms’ early life-history stages (larvae and juveniles), with no consideration of how the future adult will respond. Ontogenetic stages of marine organisms differ considerably in their forms and functions and have various degrees of sensitivity to environmental stressors [19]. As such, the phenotypic traits which benefit early life-history stages during exposure to elevated CO₂ may not necessarily benefit other life-history stages (i.e. adults) [20]. In addition, we have little understanding of the longevity of positive carryover effects in marine organisms. Are these effects short-lived and present only in the early life-history stages? Do they persist into adulthood? If so, what are the implications of this for the next generation? Studies on non-marine vertebrates showed that the conditions experienced by an organism in early life can have direct effects on their reproductive success later as well as the success of future generations (Burton and Metcalfe [21] and references therein). Understanding whether adaptive responses obtained in the early life-history stages can carryover to influence the fitness and survival of adults and the next generation during exposure to elevated CO₂ remains a significant challenge and knowledge gap, particularly in organisms with long generation times.

A recent transgenerational study on the three-spined stickleback Gasterostreus aculeatus showed that the persistence level of transgenerational carryover effects during the juvenile stage was trait specific [16]. For example, parental exposure to elevated CO₂ led to an increase in the size (influenced by paternal exposure but not maternal) and area of otoliths of G. aculeatus juveniles that were reared at both ambient and elevated CO₂ but caused a reduction in the survival and growth of juveniles that were reared at ambient CO₂. The transgenerational effects on otolith characteristics were still present 100 days post-hatch whereas the effects on survival and growth persisted for only 40 days post-hatch. Following this time, strong within-generational impacts were found on survival and growth, suggesting that both trans- and within-generational impacts have the capacity to shape the response of later life-history stages and potentially future generations to ocean acidification. In the only study to date to measure the transgenerational response of elevated CO₂ on adults, Thor and Dupont [17] found that elevated CO₂ caused a significant reduction in the fecundity of adults of the calanoid copepod, Pseudocalanus acuspes, with no previous history of exposure to elevated CO₂. But this effect was partially alleviated in adults that experienced transgenerational exposure to elevated CO₂ over multiple generations, suggesting that positive carryover effects can indeed persist in adults following transgenerational exposure. However, this species has a relatively short generation time (approx. 10 weeks to reach reproductive maturity). Whether similar positive carryover effects can persist in species with longer generation times remains to be determined.

The Sydney rock oyster, Saccostrea glomerata is an iconic mollusc species found inhabiting hard substratum in estuarine locations on the southeast coast of Australia where it forms the basis of the edible oyster industry [22]. Moreover, it has a relatively long generation time, taking approximately 9–12 months to reach reproductive maturity. Acute studies show that early life-history stages of S. glomerata are extremely vulnerable to elevated CO₂ [23–26], however, these effects are partially alleviated when their parents are reared at the same level of CO₂ during reproductive conditioning [5]. Larvae from parents conditioned at elevated CO₂ were larger in size and developed faster at both ambient and elevated CO₂ when compared with larvae from parents conditioned at ambient CO₂. The question remaining for S. glomerata is whether these positive carryover effects are limited to larval development or whether they can persist into adulthood and the next generation.

Herein, we extend our investigation to the first generation (F1) adults and second generation (F2) larvae and juveniles to test whether the positive carryover effects found in larvae following the previous parental transgenerational exposure can persist and be beneficial in adulthood. Moreover, we investigate whether similar positive carryover effects can be passed from F1 adults to F2 larvae and juveniles following subsequent transgenerational exposure. While this experiment tests whether positive carryover effects are passed to F1 adult S. glomerata following transgenerational exposure to ocean acidification, these effects may have arisen during the parental exposure, F1 larval development or a combination of the two. For this reason, throughout this study when referring to the F1 adults, we use the term ‘carryover effects’ to describe changes in physiological traits of the F1 adults that have occurred due to transgenerational effects (carryover effects passed from parents to offspring i.e. nutritional, somatic, cytoplasmic, epigenetic modifications or genetic selection) and/or within-generational effects (carryover effects which originated during larval development i.e. phenotypic plasticity or genetic selection)[2–3,21].

Materials and Methods

In 2010, the experiment began by purchasing 300 wild caught adult Sydney rock oysters from an oyster farm in Port Stephens, New South Wales (NSW) (32°45’S, 152°10’E) Australia (Holbert’s Oyster Supplies). These adults made up the ‘parental generation’ and were approximately 1.5–2 y of age at the time of collection and were at the early stages of gametogenesis; mean whole weight = 52.35 ± SE 1.51 g). The parental generation oysters were transferred in hessian bags to the Department of Primary Industries (DPI) Port Stephens Fisheries Institute (PSFI), Taylors Beach, NSW, Australia. Once in the laboratory the adults were scrubbed to remove mud and fouling organisms and were transferred into 40 L tubs which were supplied with 1 μm nominal filtered recirculating seawater from 750 L header tanks (2 tubs per header tank; 24°C; salinity 34.6 ppt), fed an algal diet of 50% Chaetoceros muelleri, 25% Pavlova lutheri and 25% Tahitian Isochrysis aff. galbana at a concentration of 2 x 10⁹ cells oyster^-1 day^-1 and allowed to acclimate to laboratory conditions for 2 w.

The experiment was divided into 2 transgenerational exposure periods: 1. Parental generation adults to First generation (F1) larvae; 2. F1 adults to Second generation (F2) larvae and juveniles.

Parental generation adults to F1 larvae

For detailed information on the first transgenerational exposure (Parental generation adults to F1 larvae) see Parker et al. [5]. Briefly, following the 2 w acclimation period, parental generation adults were divided at random into 6 groups of 50 oysters. Each group was transferred into a separate 40 L tub supplied by its own 750 L header tank. Three of the header tanks were set at ambient CO₂ of 385 μatm while the other three were set at elevated CO₂ of 856 μatm. Adults were fed the same combined algal diet provided during their acclimation period. Complete water changes were made every 2 d using preequilibrated filtered seawater (FSW) and oysters were briefly removed out of water each day (10 seconds) and rinsed with freshwater to remove faecal matter. Following 5 w of conditioning in the treatments the adults reached gravid stage and were strip spawned to allow the collection of eggs and sperm. Eggs and sperm from a minimum of 10 females and 10 males from each ‘parental adult CO₂ treatment’ (ambient or elevated CO₂) were filtered to remove debris and were fertilised in 20 L buckets at the same CO₂ level that the adults were held at (FSW, 24°C, salinity 34.6 ppt). The gametes were allowed to fertilise for 30 min to create two F1 offspring lines: ambient parental adult exposure, ambient F1 larval exposure (referred to here after as the ‘F1-control line’); and elevated parental adult exposure, elevated F1 larval exposure (referred to here after as the ‘F1-transgen line’). Following fertilisation the embryos from each line were transferred into 200 L polyethylene larval rearing tanks held at the same CO₂ concentration that they were fertilised in. There were three replicates for each of the two offspring lines (Fig 1). Larval feeding began after 16 h with the appearance of the first D-veliger larval stage. Larvae were fed an algal diet twice daily consisting of 50% Chaetoceros calcitrans, 25% P. lutheri and 25% T. Isochrysis aff. galbana for the first week of development [27]. After this time, C. calcitrans was gradually replaced with C. muelleri as the larvae increased in size. Algal concentrations ranged from 1 x 10⁴ cells mL^-1 at the beginning of the larval experiment up to 1.16 x 10⁵ cells mL^-1 at the completion of the larval experiment. Once the larvae reached eyed stage and showed signs of settlement (eye spot, 300 μm shell length, protruding foot, crawling, approximately 19 d– 21 d depending on the larval and adult CO₂ exposure treatment; see O’Connor et al. [27]) each replicate line was dosed with epinephrine (60 mg epinephrine per 2.5 g of larvae in 1 L FSW) to help induce settlement and were suspended on a 180 μm mesh settlement screen [27]. This is a common practice used in the hatchery production of this species [27]. To ensure maximum settlement and representation of each line, this process was repeated every 2 d for 6 d. Newly settled juvenile spat were rinsed with freshwater and brushed gently daily to prevent them from settling on the screens.

Download:

Fig 1. Flow chart of the experimental design.

X indicates that these lines were not followed through to the F2 generation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132276.g001

Following settlement, the newly metamorphosed spat were slowly weaned off the elevated CO₂ treatment over a 2 w period (0.05 pH unit increase every 2 d) and replicates of each treatment were pooled. Spat were fed an algal diet of 50% C. muelleri, 25% P. lutheri and 25% T. Isochrysis aff. galbana at a concentration of 50,000 cells spat^-1 d^-1 and remained in the laboratory under ambient conditions until they were large enough to be transferred into the field (approx. 5000 μm retained). Once the spat were large enough they were transferred in oyster bags back to the estuary at Port Stephens, NSW, Australia where they remained for a period of 14 mo until they reached reproductive maturity. By growing the F1 oysters from juveniles to adults in a common-garden of ambient CO₂ conditions for 14 months it allowed us to reset the environmental history of the oysters and determine whether any physiological improvements seen in the F1-transgen adults during subsequent exposure to elevated CO₂ occurred due to the transgenerational adult and larval exposure and not due to phenotypic plasticity of later life-history stages.

F1 adults to F2 larvae and juveniles

Upon reaching reproductive maturity 300 adult oysters from each of the two F1 offspring lines (F1-control and F1-transgen line) were returned from the common-garden of ambient CO₂ in the field, to the laboratory. Once in the laboratory they were cleaned to remove mud and fouling organisms and acclimated identically to the parental generation for 2 w (mean whole weight = F1-control: 25.89 ± SE 1.25g; F1-transgen: 26.00 ± SE 1.53 g). Following the acclimation period each line was divided at random into 6 groups of 50 oysters and were transferred into separate 40 L tubs. There were 12 40L tubs altogether which were supplied with recirculating FSW from 6 750 L header tanks. Each header tank supplied one 40 L tub of F1-control and one 40 L tub of F1-transgen oysters. Using a fully orthogonal design, three of the header tanks were set at ambient CO₂ (385 μatm) and three were set at elevated CO₂ (856 μatm). The adults were fed and maintained identically to the previous parental generation experiment and remained in the treatments for 5 w until they reached gravid stage. At this time (5 w), 2 oysters were removed from each replicate tub and the standard metabolic rate (SMR) and extracellular pH (pH_e) of the F1 adults was measured. The remaining adults were removed from the 40L tubs in preparation for spawning to create the F2 offspring. For more details on the experimental design see Fig 1.

Determination of extracellular pH (pH_e) and SMR in F1 Adults.

To determine the pH_e of the F1 adult oysters, hemolymph was removed by pericardial puncture using a Hamilton syringe and transferred into a microcentrifuge tube (0.5 mL) for immediate analysis. pH_e was determined using a Metrohm micro pH meter calibrated using NIST buffers. SMR in the F1 adults was determined using a closed respirometry system according to Parker et al. [5]. Feeding was stopped 24 h prior to the measurements. Oysters were then placed in 500 mL airtight chambers which were fitted with a fibre-optic probe (PreSens dipping probe DP-PSt3, AS1 Ltd, Palmerston North, New Zealand) calibrated using a two-point calibration (0% and100%) at 24°C. The oysters remained in the chambers to record the time taken for them to reduce the oxygen concentration in the chamber from 100% to 80%. At this time, the oysters were removed and shucked to determine their dry tissue mass. SMR was calculated as follows: where SMR is the oxygen consumption normalized to 1 g of dry tissue mass (mg O₂ g^-1 dry tissue mass h^-1, V_r is the volume of the respirometry chamber minus the volume of the oyster (L), ΔC_wO₂ is the change in water oxygen concentration measured (mg O₂L^-1), Δt is measuring time (h) and bw is the dry tissue mass (g) of the oyster. Six oysters were measured from each F1 line (Control or Transgen) and F1 CO₂ treatment (Ambient or Elevated CO₂) combination (2 oysters from each replicate tank_; n = 3).

F2 Larval development.

Two F1 lines were used to create the F2 generation: Control line–oysters that were held at ambient CO₂ for parental and F1 larval and adult exposure; Transgen line—oysters that were held at elevated CO₂ for parental and F1 larval and adult exposure. Eggs and sperm from a minimum of 10 females and 10 males from each F1 line (F1-control or F1-transgen) were filtered to remove debris and were fertilised in 20 L buckets (FSW, 24°C, salinity 34.6). There were two buckets for each line, with one bucket filled with ambient CO₂ FSW (385 μatm) and the other filled with elevated CO₂ FSW (856 μatm). The gametes were divided equally across the buckets and allowed to fertilise for 30 min to create four F2 offspring lines: 1) ambient parental exposure, ambient F1 exposure, ambient F2 exposure (referred to hereafter as the F2 control at ambient CO₂); 2) ambient parental exposure, ambient F1 exposure, elevated F2 exposure (referred to hereafter as the F2-control at elevated CO₂); 3) elevated parental exposure, elevated F1 exposure, ambient F2 exposure (referred to hereafter as the F2-transgen at ambient CO₂); 4) elevated parental exposure, elevated F1 exposure, elevated F2 exposure (referred to hereafter as the F2-transgen at elevated CO₂). The resulting gametes were transferred into 3 replicate 200 L tanks held at the same seawater conditions that they were fertilized in. They remained in these treatments for the duration of larval development (19 d until they reached the eyed stage). At 2 d intervals, starting at day 1, a subsample was removed from each replicate larval tank and 10 larvae tank^-1 were observed under the microscope (Leica 100X, Wetzlar, Germany). The shell length (antero-posterior measurement) of larvae was measured at each 2 d interval, percentage of abnormal larvae (D-veligers only) was measured after 1 d and the percentage of eyed larvae and percentage survival of larvae was determined after 19 d.

F2 Juvenile Spat.

In order to test the impacts of elevated CO₂ on F2 juveniles, larvae that showed signs of being ready to settle and metamorphose, were induced to set by dosing with epinephrine using the same procedure used in the previous F1 larval exposure experiment. Newly settled spat were suspended on 180 μm settlement screens and were rinsed with freshwater and brushed gently daily to prevent them from settling on the screens. The spat from each line remained in the same CO₂ exposure treatment that they were reared in for larval development and were fed the same combined algal diet as the larvae at a concentration of 50,000 cells spat^-1 d^-1. Water changes were made every 2 d. Two weeks after settlement, 90 spat were removed from each line, and divided into 3 groups of 30 spat. The shell length of each spat was measured under the light microscope (Leica 100, Wetzlar, Germany) before being transferred into three 120 mL containers with screw capped lids (30 spat container^-1). The CO₂ level in the 120 mL containers was identical to the level that the spat were already being held in and was obtained by direct bubbling of CO₂ to the desired pH. Spat were fed the same mixed algal diet at a concentration of 50,000 cells spat^-1 d^-1 and complete water changes were made daily. After 6 d in the treatments the shell length of each spat was once again measured. The impact of CO₂ and transgenerational exposure on the growth of spat was determined by subtracting the mean shell length of spat at the beginning of the experiment with the mean shell length of spat at the end of the experiment (30 spat measured from each replicate line under the light microscope; Leica 100X, Wetzlar, Germany). We also measured the impact of elevated CO₂ and transgenerational exposure on the heart rate of spat. Ten spat from each replicate line were placed on a petri dish in FSW at the same CO₂ treatment that they were being held and were viewed under a dissecting microscope ensuring that the heart was visible. For each spat, the time taken for the heart to beat 20 times was recorded. This was then converted to the number of beats per minute (BMP) using the formula: (20BPM / Time[sec])×60sec.

Manipulation of carbonate chemistry

The elevated CO₂ concentration was obtained in each experiment by manipulation of pH by direct bubbling of CO₂ in seawater controlled by independent pH negative feedback systems (Aqua Medic; accuracy ±0.01). Each negative feedback system consisted of a computer connected to a pH probe (calibrated daily using NIST buffers) and solenoid valve. When pH rose above the desired level, the solenoid valve would open and dose the tank with CO₂. For the adult exposure experiments, the pH was constantly controlled in each 750 L header tank. For the larval and spat exposure, pH was adjusted in the 200 L and 120 mL tanks, respectively, at each water change and the tanks were sealed to minimize gas exchange (see Parker et al. [5,25]). The pH_NIST level was measured twice daily using a combined pH electrode. To determine the pH corresponding to the desired CO₂ level the pH, total alkalinity (TA), temperature and salinity of the seawater was entered into the CO₂sys program developed by Lewis and Wallace [28] using the dissociation constants of Mehrbach et al. [29]. TA was measured in triplicate before and after each water change by Gran titration (mean TA_{F1 Adults} = 2334 ± SE 48 μmol kg^-1; mean TA_{F2 Larvae} = 2329 ± SE 41 μmol kg^-1; mean TA_{F2 Spat} = 2333 ± SE 42 μmol kg^-1; see Table 1 for seawater physiochemical conditions).

Download:

Table 1. Mean seawater physiochemical conditions during the F1 adult and F2 larval and spat CO₂ exposure experiments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132276.t001

Data analysis

To determine any significant differences between ‘CO₂ treatment’, and ‘transgenerational exposure’ on F1 adults of S. glomerata, pH_e and SMR of adults were analysed using a three-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) using GMAV5 [30], where ‘CO₂ treatment’ and ‘transgenerational exposure’ were fixed and orthogonal factors and ‘tank’ was random and nested in CO₂ treatment.

To determine any significant differences between ‘CO₂ treatment’ and ‘transgenerational exposure’ on the F2 larvae and spat of S. glomerata, the percentage survival, percentage development and shell length (anteroposterior measurement) of eyed larvae after 19 d, percentage of abnormal larvae after 1 d and the shell growth and heart rate (BPM) of spat were analysed using a two-way ANOVA, where ‘CO₂ treatment’ and ‘transgenerational exposure’ were fixed and orthogonal factors. Cochran's test was used to determine any heterogeneity of variances and data were transformed if significant. A Student Newman Keuls (SNK) test was used to detect differences amongst means [31].

Results

F1 Adults

There was a significant interaction effect between CO₂ and transgenerational exposure on the pH_e of F1 adults (Fig 2a; MS = 0.02, F = 25.26, df = 1; P< 0.01). After 5 w at elevated CO₂, the F1-control adults experienced a reduction in pH_e (-0.43 pH unit reduction compared with the F1-control adults reared at ambient CO₂). In the F1-transgen adults, there was also a reduction in pH_e after 5 w at elevated CO₂, however, the reduction was to a significantly lesser degree (-0.3 pH unit reduction compared with the F1-transgen adults reared at ambient CO₂) (Fig 2a; MS = 0.02, F = 25.26, df = 1; P< 0.01; SNK 385 μatm: F1-transgen = F1-control, 856 μatm: F1 CO₂-exposed > F1 control).

Download:

Fig 2. The response of F1-control and F1-transgen Saccostrea glomerata adults to ambient and elevated CO₂.

Extracellular pH (pH_e) (a), standard metabolic rate (SMR) (b) after 5 w of exposure to the CO₂ treatments (mean ± SE) (24°C, salinity 34.5 ppt).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132276.g002

There was a significant effect of elevated CO₂ but not transgenerational exposure on the whole organism SMR of the F1 adults (Fig 2b; MS = 0.19; F = 132.96; df = 1, P< 0.001). Exposure to elevated CO₂ for 35 d led to an increase in SMR in both F1 adult lines (Fig 2b). But the extent of this increase was similar in both the F1-control and F1-transgen adults.

F2 larvae and spat

Survival of larvae.

There was no effect of elevated CO₂ or transgenerational exposure on the survival of F2 larvae (Fig 3a). After 19 d, the percentage survival of larvae was similar at ambient (385 μatm) and elevated (856 μatm) CO₂ in both F2 lines (F2-control larvae and F2-transgen larvae; Fig 3a; MS = 7.13, F = 0.01, df = 1 x 8).

Download:

Fig 3. The response of F2-control and F2-transgen Saccostrea glomerata larvae to ambient and elevated CO₂.

Percentage survival of larvae after 19 d (a), percentage eyed larvae after 19 d (b), percentage abnormality after 1 d (c), shell length after 19 d (d) of exposure to the CO₂ treatments (mean ± SE) (24°C, salinity 34.5 ppt).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132276.g003

Development of larvae.

There was a significant effect of elevated CO₂ and transgenerational exposure but no interaction, on the number of larvae which developed to the eyed larval stage after 19 d in the treatments (Fig 3b). Both F2 larval lines experienced an increase in development time following exposure to elevated CO₂ as depicted by a decrease in the percentage eyed larvae compared with those reared at ambient CO₂ (Fig 3b; MS = 1008.33, F = 7.56, df = 1 x 8, P< 0.05). The development rate of the F2-transgen larvae, however, was significantly greater than the F2-control larvae (Fig 3b; MS = 1408.33, F = 10.56, df = 1 x 8, P< 0.05). Overall, after 19 d at elevated CO₂, 73% of the F2-transgen larvae had reached the eyed larval stage (final larval stage before settlement), compared to only 50% in the F2-control larvae (Fig 3b).

There was a significant interaction effect between elevated CO₂ and transgenerational exposure on the number of abnormal larvae which developed after 1 d (Fig 3c). At ambient CO₂, the number of abnormal larvae was similar between the two F2 lines. At elevated CO₂, however, there was an increase in abnormal development in the F2-control larvae but not in the F2 CO₂-transgen larvae (Fig 3c; MS = 300.00, F = 6.00, df = 1 x 8, P< 0.05).

Shell length of larvae.

There was a significant effect of elevated CO₂ and transgenerational exposure, on the shell length of S. glomerata larvae, but no interaction (Fig 3d). Exposure to elevated CO₂ for 19 d caused a reduction in the size of larvae from both F2 lines (Figs 3d and 4; MS = 24584.33, F = 10.84, df = 1 x 8, P< 0.05). The effect of transgenerational exposure differed at the beginning and end of larval development. After 1 d in the experiment, the F2 control larvae were larger in size than the F2 CO₂-exposed larvae at both ambient and elevated CO₂ (MS = 1039.05, F = 789.56, df = 1 x 8, P< 0.001). By the end of larval development (19 d), however, this trend was reversed with the F2 CO₂-exposed larvae being larger in size than the F2 control larvae (Figs 3d and 4; MS = 33148.54, F = 14.61, df = 1 x 8, P< 0.01).

Download:

Fig 4. Shell length of F2-control and F2-transgen Saccostrea glomerata larvae reared at ambient and elevated CO₂.

Shell length measured at 2 d intervals from days 1–19 (mean ± SE) (24°C, salinity 34.5 ppt).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132276.g004

Shell length and heart rate of spat.

Following settlement, there was once again a significant impact of elevated CO₂ and transgenerational exposure but no interaction on the shell growth of spat (Fig 5a). After 6 d in the treatments, newly metamorphosed spat grew less at elevated (856 μatm) compared with ambient (385 μatm) CO₂ (Fig 5a; MS = 24584.33, F = 10.84, df = 1 x 8, P< 0.05). In addition, the F2-transgen spat continued to perform better than the F2-control spat, growing faster at both ambient (385 μatm) and elevated (856 μatm) CO₂ (Fig 5a; MS = 33148.54, F = 14.61, df = 1 x 8, P< 0.01).

Download:

Fig 5. The response of F2-control and F2-trangen Saccostrea glomerata spat to ambient (385 μatm) and elevated (856 μatm) CO₂.

Shell growth (a), and heart rate (b) following 6 d of exposure to the CO₂ treatments (mean ± SE). Spat were 14 d post settlement at the beginning of the exposure (24°C, salinity 34.5 ppt).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132276.g005

Analysis of the heart rate of juvenile spat showed that it was significantly affected by the interaction of elevated CO₂ and transgenerational exposure (Fig 5b). The heart rate (BPM) of both the F2-control and F2-transgen spat was increased following 6 d of exposure to elevated CO₂ (Fig 5b; MS = 125.59, F = 39.35, df = 1 x 8; P< 0.001). Further, the heart rate of F2-transgen spat was greater than the F2-control spat at both ambient (385 μatm) and elevated (856 μatm) CO₂.

Discussion

Transgenerational exposure of adult Sydney rock oysters to elevated CO₂ during reproductive conditioning was previously found to have positive carryover effects for the shell growth and development rate of larvae during exposure to the same level of elevated CO₂ [5]. Here we tested whether these positive carryover effects that were found previously in F1 larvae could persist into adulthood (F1 adults) and whether subsequent transgenerational exposure of F1 adults to elevated CO₂ would facilitate similar adaptive responses in the next generation (F2 larvae and juveniles). Overall, we found positive carryover effects, originating from the parental adults and F1 larvae following transgenerational exposure, persisted to improve the physiological performance of F1 adults at elevated CO₂. F1-transgen adults had a greater capacity to regulate extracellular pH at elevated CO₂ than the F1-control adults. In addition, subsequent transgenerational exposure of F1 adults led to an increase in the resilience of the larval and juvenile F2 offspring. F2-transgen larvae had a lower percentage abnormality at elevated CO₂ than F2-control larvae and developed at a faster rate and were larger in size after 19 d at both ambient and elevated CO₂. This trend continued following settlement with F2-transgen spat growing faster and having a faster heart rate (BPM) than F2-control spat at both ambient and elevated CO₂. The results of our study show that transgenerational exposure of marine organisms to elevated CO₂ may be even more beneficial than previously thought, as enhanced performance at elevated CO₂ was found not only in F1 larvae following transgenerational exposure but also in F1 adults, despite the oysters spending a period of 14 mo at ambient CO₂. Moreover, subsequent transgenerational exposure led to similar positive carryover effects in the F2 offspring.

The ability of marine organisms to maintain extracellular acid-base status during exposure to elevated CO₂ has previously been identified as a critical physiological trait determining their level of resilience [32–34]. Reductions in extracellular pH during exposure to ocean acidification in particular can have serious consequences for marine species if left uncompensated, including reduced shell size [35–36] and somatic growth [37], changes in immune response [38], increased protein degradation [39], changes in SMR [5,37,39–42] and mortality in extreme cases [43–47]. Like most previous studies on shelled molluscs, exposure of S. glomerata adults in this study to elevated CO₂ for 5 w led to a significant reduction in extracellular pH [34,39,40,48,49] (but not Marchant et al. [50]). The extent of this reduction was considerably less, however, in the F1-transgen adults compared to the F1-control adults, suggesting that previous transgenerational exposure of the parental adults and F1 larvae to elevated CO₂ may have led to a greater capacity to regulate extracellular acid-base status.

The mechanisms of extracellular pH regulation in marine molluscs may involve passive buffering of free protons in the body fluids by either the CO₂-bicarbonate system (albeit with limited efficiency) or the non-bicarbonate buffering system (such as N-terminal α amino acid groups of proteins or organic/ inorganic phosphate groups) [32]. Passive mechanisms minimize ongoing pH changes but do not defend steady state pH values [32]. Steady state pH values are set and maintained by active ion transport (active proton equivalent ion exchange across specialized epithelia causing the net accumulation of bicarbonate ions in the extracellular fluid) [33,51]. In this study, since the pH values recorded were steady state values, various degrees of passive buffering, for example by a greater concentration of non-bicarbonate buffers in the extracellular fluid of the F1-transgen adults, is considered unlikely for the greater regulation of extracellular pH at elevated CO₂. Instead, it was expected that the enhanced efforts to compensate for the acidosis in the F1-transgen adults was an active process, incurring an increased metabolic cost [51]. Analysis of whole organism SMR, however, suggests that this did not occur (at least at the whole organism level), as the metabolic rate of F1 adults increased during exposure to elevated CO₂ but this increase did not differ between the F1-control and F1-transgen adults. Instead, the F1-transgen adults may rather have shifted to some more energy efficient ion exchange mechanisms [51] or have undergone an adaptive alteration in their energy budget [37,40,52]. More energy may be diverted to extracellular acid-base regulation with less going into reproduction (as evidenced by the reduced size of the F2-transgen larvae at the beginning of larval development, 24 h post fertilization). Alterations in the partitioning of the energy budget of marine invertebrates during exposure to elevated CO₂ have been suggested by a number of studies [5,37,40,52] but currently these alterations have been virtually unexplored.

The results of recent factorial breeding experiments suggest that increased maternal provisioning, whereby mothers invest more energy per egg/ offspring [53,54,55], may be one of the mechanisms immediately available to marine invertebrates species to safeguard their larvae against the impacts of elevated CO₂ [8–9]. For example, maternal differences in larval size of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus franciscanus and the mussel Mytilus trossulus were shown to directly influence the response of larvae to elevated CO₂, with larger sized larvae being more resilient [8]. In our previous transgenerational experiment, maternal provisioning was identified as a possible mechanisms that caused increased resilience of larvae of S. glomerata. This was suggested as larvae from parents pre-exposed to elevated CO₂ were larger in size at the beginning of larval development when compared to larvae from parents with no pre-exposure to elevated CO₂ [5]. While maternal provisioning may indeed be a partial mechanism of resilience for S. glomerata, it does not explain why the F1-transgen adults in this study had a better capacity to regulate extracellular pH. In addition, the F2-transgen larvae were smaller in size at the beginning of larval development (1 d post-fertilization) yet still outperformed the F2-control larvae in all parameters measured in this study (growth, development rate, abnormality) at both ambient and elevated CO₂. This brings us to the conclusion that epigenetic and/or genetic adaptive responses may also have been involved.

Epigenetic inheritance was identified as a mechanism for acclimation following transgenerational exposure of the anemonefish, Amphiprion melanopus [10] and sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis [13] to elevated CO₂. In both species, pre-exposure of adults to elevated CO₂ resulted in offspring that were not negatively affected by elevated CO₂. Analysis of hatching (A. melanopus) and egg size (S. droebachiensis) revealed no significant difference between adult treatments, indicating that increases in maternal provisioning did not occur [10,13]. The authors instead suggested the occurrence of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance, where a beneficial change in gene expression in adults during exposure to elevated CO₂ was passed to their offspring, improving offspring performance at elevated CO₂ [10]. In this study, persistent epigenetic changes in gene expression, for example changes in the expression of key enzymes involved in acid-base regulation (e.g. Na⁺-K⁺-ATPase), may have occurred. These epigenetic changes may have originated during adult reproductive conditioning (transgenerational epigenetic inheritance) or F1 larval development and persisted to improve the performance of the F1 adults and F2 larvae and juvenile spat. Studies on other organisms have shown that the early life-history stages are critical developmental windows for lasting epigenetic changes during exposure to environmental factors. For example, in humans, maternal diet during pregnancy can lead to epigenetic changes in the embryo [56–58]. Further, in fish, environmental temperature during larval development can influence gender [59]. In the oyster, Crassostrea gigas, DNA methylation, a major mode of epigenetic change, has been suggested as a pivotal mechanism allowing them to survive in changing environments [60], however, the persistence of epigenetic change in oysters over multiple generations is yet to be demonstrated [61].

A final and perhaps most probable mechanism of adaptation of S. glomerata as measured in this study was through natural selection of genotypes that were more tolerant to elevated CO₂ [62]. We used a group spawning design where spermatozoa from 10 males and eggs from 10 females were pooled together and allowed to fertilize. A result of this design is a diversity of genetic crosses. High mortality during larval development (46% in both the F1 and F2 generation; see Parker et al. [5] for F1 larval survival) may well have resulted in the survival of the most CO₂ tolerant individuals. Indeed, in the calanoid copepod Pseudocalanus acuspes, natural selection due to high larval mortality (>50%) following transgenerational exposure to elevated CO₂ was identified a possible mechanism associated with improved performance of adult fecundity at elevated CO₂ [17].

Evidence from previous studies suggest that rapid evolutionary adaptation to ocean acidification may be possible (Sea urchin, Pespeni et al. [62]; Polychaete, Calosi et al. [63]). Pespeni et al. [62] found CO₂-induced changes in allele frequencies related to lipid metabolism, ion homeostasis, protein modification and cell signalling in larvae of the purple sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus that allowed them to maintain normal growth and development under elevated CO₂ of 900 μatm. These changes in allele frequency were shown to be induced by natural selection during larval development. In the present study, natural selection seems to have favoured individuals with faster rates of growth. In the F2-transgen offspring, for example, shell growth of both larvae and juvenile spat was increased when compared to F2-control offspring. This increased growth occurred when offspring were reared in both the ambient and elevated CO₂ treatments. Previous research on adult S. glomerata found that oysters which had been selectively bred by industry for faster growth were more resilient than wild oyster populations to elevated CO₂ [5,26]. This resilience was attributed to their faster metabolic rate [5], a phenomenon that has also been observed in organisms with a natural resilience to elevated CO₂ [33]. Faster growth rates of F2 larvae and juvenile spat found in this study following transgenerational exposure to elevated CO₂ over two consecutive generations may also reflect an increase metabolic rate. In the F2-transgen juvenile spat for example, heart rate, a possible indicator of metabolic rate, was increased compared to the F2-control juvenile spat at both ambient and elevated CO₂, suggesting that natural selection of individuals with an increase in metabolic rate potentially occurred [64–65]. While increased metabolic rate may positively influence the resilience of oysters to elevated CO₂, it may negatively impact them in the in the presence of other environmental stressors [4,66–68]. For example, increased metabolic rate is predicted to narrow the thermal tolerance windows of marine invertebrates by decreasing aerobic scope [66]. Increased metabolic rate also increases an organism’s demand for food. If environmental food supply is not optimal, larvae and juvenile spat may be energy deficient, resulting in decreased growth, survival and metamorphic ability [19,68,69–71].

Oysters are sessile organisms which lack an escape response. Acclimation or adaptation of these species to elevated CO₂ will therefore be essential in order to prevent local extinction over this century. Understanding the persistence of carryover effects on a wider range of phenotypic traits both within and across generations, the mechanisms underlying them and whether or not there are any limitations or trade-offs associated [20], will ultimately lead to a more reliable prediction of the impacts of near-future ocean acidification for marine species.

Acknowledgments

We wish acknowledge staff, students and volunteers from the NSW DPI Port Stephens Fisheries Centre, University of Western Sydney, Macquarie University and the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research including Michael Dove, Stephan O’Connor, Lynne Foulkes, Kyle Johnston, Andrew Parnell, Brandt Archer, Justin Kelly, John Wright, Elliot Scanes, Emma Thompson, Kelli Anderson, Matthew Smiles, Steven, Julie, Elizabeth, Alexander and David Parker for their tremendous assistance in the laboratory during our 2 y experiment.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: LMP PMR. Performed the experiments: LMP. Analyzed the data: LMP PMR. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LMP PMR WAO DAR HOP. Wrote the paper: LMP PMR WAO DAR HOP.

References

1. IPCC. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (eds Solomon S et al.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, USA; 2007.
2. Munday PL, Warner RR, Monro K, Pandolfi JM, Marshall DJ. Predicting evolutionary responses to climate change in the sea. Ecol Lett. 2013; 16: 1488–1500. pmid:24119205
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Sunday JM, Calosi P, Dupont S, Munday PL, Stillman JH, Reusch TBH. Evolution in an acidifying ocean. Trends Ecol Evol. 2014; 29: 117–125. pmid:24355315
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Kelly MW, Hofmann GE. Adaptation and the physiology of ocean acidification. Funct Ecol. 2012;
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Parker LM, Ross PM, O’Connor WA, Borysko L, Raftos DA, Pörtner HO. Adult exposure influences offspring response to ocean acidification in oysters. Global Change Biol. 2012; 18: 82–92.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Form AU, Riebesell U. Acclimation to ocean acidification during long-term CO₂ exposure in the cold-water coral coral Lophelia pertusa. Global Change Biol. 2012; 18: 843–853.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Pistevos JCA, Calosi P, Widdicombe S, Bishop JDD. Will variation among genetic individuals influence species responses to global climate change? Oikos. 2011; 120: 675–689.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Sunday JM, Crim RN, Harley CDG, Hart MW. Quantifying rates of evolutionary adaptation in response to ocean acidification. PLoS One, 2011; 6, 10.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Foo SA, Dqorjanyn SA, Poore AGB, Byrne M. Adaptive capacity of the habitat modifying sea urchin Centristephanus rodgersii to ocean warming and ocean acidification: Performance of early embryos. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8): e42497. pmid:22880005
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Miller GM, Watson S-A, Donelson JM, McCormick M, Munday PL. Parental environment mediates impacts of increased carbon dioxide on a coral reef fish. Nature Clim Change. 2012; 2: 858–861.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Schlegel P, Havenhand JN, Gillings MR, Williamson JE. Individual variability in reproductive success determines winners and losers under ocean acidification: A case study with sea urchins. PLoS One. 2012; 7(12): e53118. pmid:23300876
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Vehmaa A, Brutemark A, Engstrӧm-Ӧst J. Maternal effects may act as an adaptation mechanism for copepods facing pH and temperature changes. PLoS One. 2012; 7 (10): e48538. pmid:23119052
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Dupont S, Dorey N, Stumpp M, Melzner F, Thorndyke M. Long-term and trans-life-cycle effects of exposure to ocean acidification in the green sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. Mar Biol. 2013;
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Kelly MW, Hofmann GE. Adaptation and the physiology of ocean acidification. Funct Ecol. 2013; 27: 980–990.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Pespeni MH, Barney BT, Palumbi SR. Differences in the regulation of growth and biomineralization genes revealed through long-term common-garden acclimation and experimental genomics in the purple sea urchin. Evolution. 2012;
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Schade FM, Clemmesen C, Mathais Wegner K. Within- and transgenerational effects of ocean acidification on life history of marine three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Mar Biol. 2014; 161: 1667–1676.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Thor P, Dupont S. Transgenerational effects alleviate severe fecundity loss during ocean acidification in a ubiquitous planktonic copepod. Global Change Biol. 2015;
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Welch MJ, Watson S-A, Welsh JQ, McCormick MI, Munday PL. Effects of elevated CO₂ on fish behaviour is undiminished by transgenerational acclimation. Nature Clim Change. 2014; 4: 1086–1089.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Hettinger A, Sanford E, Hill TM, Russell AD, Sato KNS, Hoey J, et al. Persistent carry-over effects of planktonic exposure to ocean acidification in the Olympia oyster. Ecology. 2012; 93: 2758–2768. pmid:23431605
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Munday PL. Transgenerational acclimation of fishes to climate change and ocean acidification. F1000 Prime Reports. 2014; 6 (99):
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Burton T, Metcalfe NB. Can environmental conditions experienced in early life influence future generations? P R Soc B. 2014; 281: 20140311.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Trenaman R, Livingston S, Creese A. Aquaculture Production Report 2013–2014. NSW Department of Primary Industries. 2014; 10 pp.
23. Parker LM, Ross PM, O’Connor WA. The effect of ocean acidification and temperature on the fertilisation and embryonic development of the Sydney rock oyster, Saccostrea glomerata (Gould 1850). Global Change Biol. 2009; 15: 2123–2136.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Watson S-A, Southgate PC, Tyler PA, Peck LS. Early larval development of the Sydney rock oyster Saccostrea glomerata under near-future predictions of CO₂-driven ocean acidification. J Shell Res. 2009; 28(3): 431–437.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Parker LM, Ross PM, O’Connor WA. Comparing the effect of elevated pCO2 and temperature on the reproduction and early development of two species of oysters. Mar Biol. 2010; 157: 2435–2452.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Parker LM, Ross PM, O’Connor WA. Populations of the Sydney rock oyster, Saccostrea glomerata, vary in response to ocean acidification. Mar Biol. 2011; 158: 689–697.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. O’Connor WA, Dove MC, Finn B, O’Connor SJ. Manual for hatchery production of Sydney rock oysters (Saccostrea glomerata). Final report to Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, Deakin, ACT, Australia. New South Wales Department of Primary Industries—Fisheries Research Report Series. 2008; 20: 55 pp.
28. Lewis E, Wallace DWR. Program Developed for CO2 System Calculations. ORNL/ CDIAC-105. Carbon dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN. 1998.
29. Mehrbach C, Culberson CH, Hawley JE, Pytkowicz RN. Measurement of apparent dissociation constants of carbonic acid in seawater at atmospheric pressure. Limnol Oceanogr. 1973; 18: 897–907.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Underwood AJ. Experiments in ecology: Their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 1997.
31. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. WH Freeman and Company, New York. 1995.
32. Pörtner HO, Langenbuch M, Reipschläger A. Biological impact of elevated ocean CO2 concentrations: lessons from animal physiology and Earth history. J Oceanogr. 2004; 60: 705–718.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Melzner F, Gutowska M, Langenbuch M, Dupont S, Lucassen M, Thorndyke MC, et al. Physiological basis for high CO2 tolerance in marine ectothermic animals: Pre-adaptation through lifestyle and ontogeny? Biogeosciences. 2009; 6: 2313–2331.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Gutowska MA, Pörtner HO, Melzner F. Growth and calcification in the cephalopod Sepia officinalis under elevated seawater pCO₂. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser. 2008; 373: 303–309.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Gazeau F, Parker LM, Comeau S, Gattuso J-P, O’Connor WA, Martin S, et al. Impacts of ocean acidification on marine shelled molluscs. Mar Biol. 2013;
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Parker LM, Ross PM, O’Connor WA, Pörtner HO, Scanes E, Wright JM, et al. Predicting the response of molluscs to the impact of ocean acidification. Biology. 2013; 2: 651–692. pmid:24832802
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Beniash E, Ivanina A, Lieb NS, Kurochkin I. Elevated level of carbon dioxide affects metabolism and shell formation in oysters Crassostrea virginica. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser. 2010; 419: 95–108.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Matozzo V, Chinellato A, Munari M, Bressan M, Marin MG. Can the combination of decreased pH and increased temperature values induce oxidative stress in the clam Chamelea gallina and the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. Mar Pollut Bull. 2013;
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Michaelidis B.; Ouzounis C.; Paleras A.; Pörtner H.O. Effects of long-term moderate hypercapnia on acid-base balance and growth rate in marine mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser. 2005; 293: 109–118.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Lannig G, Eilers S, Pörtner H-O, Sokolova IM, Bock C. Impact of ocean acidification on energy metabolism of oyster, Crassostrea gigas–changes in metabolic pathways and thermal response. Mar Drugs. 2010; 8: 2318–2339, pmid:20948910
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Thomsen J, Gutowska M, Saphörster J, Heinemann A, Trübenbach K, Fietzke J, et al. Calcifying invertebrates succeed in a naturally CO2 enriched coastal habitat but are threatened by high levels of future acidification. Biogeosciences. 2010; 7: 5119–5156.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Cummings V, Hewitt J, van Rooyen A, Currie K, Beard S, Thrush S, et al. Ocean acidification at high latitudes: Potential effects on functioning of the Antarctic bivalve Laternula elliptica. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e16069. pmid:21245932
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Shirayama Y, Thornton H. Effect of increased atmospheric CO2 on shallow water marine benthos. J Geophys Res. 2005; 110: C09S08.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
44. Berge JA, Bjerkeng B, Pettersen O, Schaanning MT, Øxnevad S. Effects of increased seawater concentrations of CO2 on growth of the bivalve Mytilus edulis L. Chemosphere. 2006; 62: 681–687. pmid:15990149
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Green MA, Waldbusser GG, Reilly SL, Emerson K. Death by dissolution: Sediment saturation state as a mortality factor for juvenile bivalves. Limnol Oceanogr. 2009; 54: 1037–1047.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
46. Lischka S, Buedenbender J, Boxhammer T, Riebesell U. Impact of ocean acidification and elevated temperatures on early juveniles of the polar shelled pteropod Limacina helicina: Mortality, shell degradation, and shell growth. Biogeosciences. 2010; 7: 8177–8214.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
47. Range P, Chícharo MA, Ben-Hamadou R, Piló D, Matias D, Joaquim S, et al. Calcification, growth and mortality of juvenile clams Ruditapes decussatus under increased pCO₂ and reduced pH: Variable responses to ocean acidification at local scales? J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2010; 396: 177–184.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
48. Hammer KM, Kristiansen E, Zachariassen KE. Physiological effects of hypercapnia in the deep-sea bivalve Acesta excavata (Fabricius, 1779) (Bivalvia; Limidae). Mar Environ Res. 2011; 72: 135–142. pmid:21831420
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Ivanina AV, Beniash E, Etzkorn M, Meyer TB, Ringwood AH, Sokolova IM. Short-term hypercapnia affects cellular responses to trace metals in the hard clams Mercenaria mercenaria. Aquat Toxicol. 2013;
- View Article
- Google Scholar
50. Marchant HK, Calosi P, Spicer JI. Short-term exposure to hypercapnia does not compromise feeding, acid-base balance or respiration of Patella vulgata but surprisingly is accompanied by radula damage. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 2010; 90: 1379–1384.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
51. Pörtner H., Bock C. & Reipschlager A. Modulation of the cost of pHi regulation during metabolic depression: a (31) P-NMR study in invertebrate (Sipunculus nudus) isolated muscle. J. Exp. Biol. 2000; 203, 2417–2428. pmid:10903156
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Talmage SC, Gobler CJ. Effects of past, present, and future ocean carbon dioxide concentrations on the growth and survival of larval shellfish. PNAS. 2010; 107: 17246–17251. pmid:20855590
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
53. Podolsky RD, Moran AL. Integrating function across marine life cycles. Integra Comp Biol. 2006; 46: 577–586.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
54. Allen RM, Buckley YM, Marshall DJ. Offspring size plasticity in response to intraspecific competition: an adaptive maternal effect across life-history stages. Amer Nat. 2008; 171: 225–337
- View Article
- Google Scholar
55. Moran AI, McAlister JS. Egg size as a life history character of marine invertebrates: is it all it’s cracked up to be? Biol Bull. 2009; 216: 226–242. pmid:19556591
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
56. McCarthy MM, Crews D. Epigenetics—New Frontiers in neuroendocrinology. PLoS Genet. 2008; 29: 341–343.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
57. Crews D. Epigenetic, brain, behaviour, and the environment. Hormones. 2010; 9: 41–50. pmid:20363720
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
58. Wilson ME, Sengoku T. Developmental regulation of neuronal genes by DNA methylation: environmental influences. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2013; pmid:23501000.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
59. Navarro-Martin L, Vinas J, Ribas I, Diaz N, Gutierrez A, DiCrose L, et al. DNA Methylation of the gonadal. PLoS Genet. 2011; 7: e1002447. pmid:22242011
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
60. Vandegehuchte MB, Janssen CR. Epigenetics in an ecotoxicological context. Mutat Res-Gen Tox En. 2014; 764–765: 36–45.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
61. Riviere G. Epigenetic features in the oyster Crassostrea gigas suggestive of functionally relevant promotor DNA methylation in invertebrates. F Phys. 2014; 5: 1–7.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
62. Pespini MH, Sanford E, Gayord B, Hill TM, Hosfelt JD, Jaris HK, et al. Evolutionary change during experimental ocean acidification. PNAS. 2013; 110 (17): 6937–6942. pmid:23569232
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
63. Calosi P, Rastrick SPS, Lombardi C, De Guzman HJ, Davidson L, Jahnke M, et al. Adaptation and acclimatization to ocean acidification in marine ectotherms: an in situ transplant experiment with polychaetes at a shallow CO₂ vent system. Phil Trans R Soc BS. 2013; 368: 20120444.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
64. Ellis RP, Bersey J, Rundle SD, Hall-Spencer JM, Spicer JI. Subtle but significant effects of CO₂ acidified seawater on embryos of the intertidal snail, Littorina obtusata. Aquat Biol. 2009; 5: 41–48.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
65. Walther K, Satoris FJ, Bock C, Pörtner HO. Impact of anthropogenic ocean acidification on thermal tolerance of the spider crab Hyas araneus. Biogeosciences. 2009; 6: 2207–2215.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
66. Pörtner HO, Farrell AP. Physiology and climate change. Science. 2008; 322: 690–692.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
67. Byrne M. Impact of ocean warming and ocean acidification on marine invertebrate life history stages: vulnerabilities and potential for persistence in a changing ocean. Oceano. Mar. Biol: Ann. Rev. 2011; 49: 1–42.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
68. Hettinger A, Sanford E, Hill TM, Hosfelt JD, Russell AD, Gaylord B. The influence of food supply on the response of Olympia oyster larvae to ocean acidification. Biogeosciences. 2013; 10: 5781–5802.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
69. Videla JA, Chaparro OR, Thompson RJ, Concha II. Role of biochemical energy reserves in the metamorphosis and early juvenile development of the oyster Ostrea chilensis. Mar Biol. 1998; 132: 635–640.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
70. Melzner F, Stange P, Trübenbach K, Thomsen J, Casties I, Panknin U, et al. Food supply and seawater pCO2 impact calcification and internal shell dissolution in the blue mussel Mytilus edulis. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e24223. pmid:21949698
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
71. Thomsen J, Casties I, Pansch C, Körtzinger A, Melzner F. Food availability outweighs ocean acidification effects in juvenile Mytilus edulis: Laboratory and field experiments. Global Change Biol. 2013;
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. IPCC. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (eds Solomon S et al.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, USA; 2007.

[ref2] 2. Munday PL, Warner RR, Monro K, Pandolfi JM, Marshall DJ. Predicting evolutionary responses to climate change in the sea. Ecol Lett. 2013; 16: 1488–1500. pmid:24119205
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[3] View Article

[4] PubMed/NCBI

[5] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Sunday JM, Calosi P, Dupont S, Munday PL, Stillman JH, Reusch TBH. Evolution in an acidifying ocean. Trends Ecol Evol. 2014; 29: 117–125. pmid:24355315
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[7] View Article

[8] PubMed/NCBI

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Kelly MW, Hofmann GE. Adaptation and the physiology of ocean acidification. Funct Ecol. 2012;
View Article
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Parker LM, Ross PM, O’Connor WA, Borysko L, Raftos DA, Pörtner HO. Adult exposure influences offspring response to ocean acidification in oysters. Global Change Biol. 2012; 18: 82–92.
View Article
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Form AU, Riebesell U. Acclimation to ocean acidification during long-term CO₂ exposure in the cold-water coral coral Lophelia pertusa. Global Change Biol. 2012; 18: 843–853.
View Article
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Pistevos JCA, Calosi P, Widdicombe S, Bishop JDD. Will variation among genetic individuals influence species responses to global climate change? Oikos. 2011; 120: 675–689.
View Article
Google Scholar

[20] View Article

[21] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Sunday JM, Crim RN, Harley CDG, Hart MW. Quantifying rates of evolutionary adaptation in response to ocean acidification. PLoS One, 2011; 6, 10.
View Article
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Foo SA, Dqorjanyn SA, Poore AGB, Byrne M. Adaptive capacity of the habitat modifying sea urchin Centristephanus rodgersii to ocean warming and ocean acidification: Performance of early embryos. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8): e42497. pmid:22880005
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Miller GM, Watson S-A, Donelson JM, McCormick M, Munday PL. Parental environment mediates impacts of increased carbon dioxide on a coral reef fish. Nature Clim Change. 2012; 2: 858–861.
View Article
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Schlegel P, Havenhand JN, Gillings MR, Williamson JE. Individual variability in reproductive success determines winners and losers under ocean acidification: A case study with sea urchins. PLoS One. 2012; 7(12): e53118. pmid:23300876
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] PubMed/NCBI

[35] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Vehmaa A, Brutemark A, Engstrӧm-Ӧst J. Maternal effects may act as an adaptation mechanism for copepods facing pH and temperature changes. PLoS One. 2012; 7 (10): e48538. pmid:23119052
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] PubMed/NCBI

[39] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Dupont S, Dorey N, Stumpp M, Melzner F, Thorndyke M. Long-term and trans-life-cycle effects of exposure to ocean acidification in the green sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. Mar Biol. 2013;
View Article
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Kelly MW, Hofmann GE. Adaptation and the physiology of ocean acidification. Funct Ecol. 2013; 27: 980–990.
View Article
Google Scholar

[44] View Article

[45] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Pespeni MH, Barney BT, Palumbi SR. Differences in the regulation of growth and biomineralization genes revealed through long-term common-garden acclimation and experimental genomics in the purple sea urchin. Evolution. 2012;
View Article
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Schade FM, Clemmesen C, Mathais Wegner K. Within- and transgenerational effects of ocean acidification on life history of marine three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Mar Biol. 2014; 161: 1667–1676.
View Article
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Thor P, Dupont S. Transgenerational effects alleviate severe fecundity loss during ocean acidification in a ubiquitous planktonic copepod. Global Change Biol. 2015;
View Article
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Welch MJ, Watson S-A, Welsh JQ, McCormick MI, Munday PL. Effects of elevated CO₂ on fish behaviour is undiminished by transgenerational acclimation. Nature Clim Change. 2014; 4: 1086–1089.
View Article
Google Scholar

[56] View Article

[57] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Hettinger A, Sanford E, Hill TM, Russell AD, Sato KNS, Hoey J, et al. Persistent carry-over effects of planktonic exposure to ocean acidification in the Olympia oyster. Ecology. 2012; 93: 2758–2768. pmid:23431605
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] PubMed/NCBI

[61] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Munday PL. Transgenerational acclimation of fishes to climate change and ocean acidification. F1000 Prime Reports. 2014; 6 (99):
View Article
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Burton T, Metcalfe NB. Can environmental conditions experienced in early life influence future generations? P R Soc B. 2014; 281: 20140311.
View Article
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Trenaman R, Livingston S, Creese A. Aquaculture Production Report 2013–2014. NSW Department of Primary Industries. 2014; 10 pp.

[ref23] 23. Parker LM, Ross PM, O’Connor WA. The effect of ocean acidification and temperature on the fertilisation and embryonic development of the Sydney rock oyster, Saccostrea glomerata (Gould 1850). Global Change Biol. 2009; 15: 2123–2136.
View Article
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Watson S-A, Southgate PC, Tyler PA, Peck LS. Early larval development of the Sydney rock oyster Saccostrea glomerata under near-future predictions of CO₂-driven ocean acidification. J Shell Res. 2009; 28(3): 431–437.
View Article
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Parker LM, Ross PM, O’Connor WA. Comparing the effect of elevated pCO2 and temperature on the reproduction and early development of two species of oysters. Mar Biol. 2010; 157: 2435–2452.
View Article
Google Scholar

[76] View Article

[77] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Parker LM, Ross PM, O’Connor WA. Populations of the Sydney rock oyster, Saccostrea glomerata, vary in response to ocean acidification. Mar Biol. 2011; 158: 689–697.
View Article
Google Scholar

[79] View Article

[80] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. O’Connor WA, Dove MC, Finn B, O’Connor SJ. Manual for hatchery production of Sydney rock oysters (Saccostrea glomerata). Final report to Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, Deakin, ACT, Australia. New South Wales Department of Primary Industries—Fisheries Research Report Series. 2008; 20: 55 pp.

[ref28] 28. Lewis E, Wallace DWR. Program Developed for CO2 System Calculations. ORNL/ CDIAC-105. Carbon dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN. 1998.

[ref29] 29. Mehrbach C, Culberson CH, Hawley JE, Pytkowicz RN. Measurement of apparent dissociation constants of carbonic acid in seawater at atmospheric pressure. Limnol Oceanogr. 1973; 18: 897–907.
View Article
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Underwood AJ. Experiments in ecology: Their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 1997.

[ref31] 31. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. WH Freeman and Company, New York. 1995.

[ref32] 32. Pörtner HO, Langenbuch M, Reipschläger A. Biological impact of elevated ocean CO2 concentrations: lessons from animal physiology and Earth history. J Oceanogr. 2004; 60: 705–718.
View Article
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Melzner F, Gutowska M, Langenbuch M, Dupont S, Lucassen M, Thorndyke MC, et al. Physiological basis for high CO2 tolerance in marine ectothermic animals: Pre-adaptation through lifestyle and ontogeny? Biogeosciences. 2009; 6: 2313–2331.
View Article
Google Scholar

[92] View Article

[93] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Gutowska MA, Pörtner HO, Melzner F. Growth and calcification in the cephalopod Sepia officinalis under elevated seawater pCO₂. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser. 2008; 373: 303–309.
View Article
Google Scholar

[95] View Article

[96] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Gazeau F, Parker LM, Comeau S, Gattuso J-P, O’Connor WA, Martin S, et al. Impacts of ocean acidification on marine shelled molluscs. Mar Biol. 2013;
View Article
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Parker LM, Ross PM, O’Connor WA, Pörtner HO, Scanes E, Wright JM, et al. Predicting the response of molluscs to the impact of ocean acidification. Biology. 2013; 2: 651–692. pmid:24832802
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] PubMed/NCBI

[103] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Beniash E, Ivanina A, Lieb NS, Kurochkin I. Elevated level of carbon dioxide affects metabolism and shell formation in oysters Crassostrea virginica. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser. 2010; 419: 95–108.
View Article
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Matozzo V, Chinellato A, Munari M, Bressan M, Marin MG. Can the combination of decreased pH and increased temperature values induce oxidative stress in the clam Chamelea gallina and the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. Mar Pollut Bull. 2013;
View Article
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Michaelidis B.; Ouzounis C.; Paleras A.; Pörtner H.O. Effects of long-term moderate hypercapnia on acid-base balance and growth rate in marine mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser. 2005; 293: 109–118.
View Article
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Lannig G, Eilers S, Pörtner H-O, Sokolova IM, Bock C. Impact of ocean acidification on energy metabolism of oyster, Crassostrea gigas–changes in metabolic pathways and thermal response. Mar Drugs. 2010; 8: 2318–2339, pmid:20948910
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Thomsen J, Gutowska M, Saphörster J, Heinemann A, Trübenbach K, Fietzke J, et al. Calcifying invertebrates succeed in a naturally CO2 enriched coastal habitat but are threatened by high levels of future acidification. Biogeosciences. 2010; 7: 5119–5156.
View Article
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Cummings V, Hewitt J, van Rooyen A, Currie K, Beard S, Thrush S, et al. Ocean acidification at high latitudes: Potential effects on functioning of the Antarctic bivalve Laternula elliptica. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e16069. pmid:21245932
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[121] View Article

[122] PubMed/NCBI

[123] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Shirayama Y, Thornton H. Effect of increased atmospheric CO2 on shallow water marine benthos. J Geophys Res. 2005; 110: C09S08.
View Article
Google Scholar

[125] View Article

[126] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Berge JA, Bjerkeng B, Pettersen O, Schaanning MT, Øxnevad S. Effects of increased seawater concentrations of CO2 on growth of the bivalve Mytilus edulis L. Chemosphere. 2006; 62: 681–687. pmid:15990149
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[128] View Article

[129] PubMed/NCBI

[130] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Green MA, Waldbusser GG, Reilly SL, Emerson K. Death by dissolution: Sediment saturation state as a mortality factor for juvenile bivalves. Limnol Oceanogr. 2009; 54: 1037–1047.
View Article
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Lischka S, Buedenbender J, Boxhammer T, Riebesell U. Impact of ocean acidification and elevated temperatures on early juveniles of the polar shelled pteropod Limacina helicina: Mortality, shell degradation, and shell growth. Biogeosciences. 2010; 7: 8177–8214.
View Article
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Range P, Chícharo MA, Ben-Hamadou R, Piló D, Matias D, Joaquim S, et al. Calcification, growth and mortality of juvenile clams Ruditapes decussatus under increased pCO₂ and reduced pH: Variable responses to ocean acidification at local scales? J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2010; 396: 177–184.
View Article
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Hammer KM, Kristiansen E, Zachariassen KE. Physiological effects of hypercapnia in the deep-sea bivalve Acesta excavata (Fabricius, 1779) (Bivalvia; Limidae). Mar Environ Res. 2011; 72: 135–142. pmid:21831420
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[141] View Article

[142] PubMed/NCBI

[143] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Ivanina AV, Beniash E, Etzkorn M, Meyer TB, Ringwood AH, Sokolova IM. Short-term hypercapnia affects cellular responses to trace metals in the hard clams Mercenaria mercenaria. Aquat Toxicol. 2013;
View Article
Google Scholar

[145] View Article

[146] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Marchant HK, Calosi P, Spicer JI. Short-term exposure to hypercapnia does not compromise feeding, acid-base balance or respiration of Patella vulgata but surprisingly is accompanied by radula damage. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 2010; 90: 1379–1384.
View Article
Google Scholar

[148] View Article

[149] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Pörtner H., Bock C. & Reipschlager A. Modulation of the cost of pHi regulation during metabolic depression: a (31) P-NMR study in invertebrate (Sipunculus nudus) isolated muscle. J. Exp. Biol. 2000; 203, 2417–2428. pmid:10903156
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[151] View Article

[152] PubMed/NCBI

[153] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Talmage SC, Gobler CJ. Effects of past, present, and future ocean carbon dioxide concentrations on the growth and survival of larval shellfish. PNAS. 2010; 107: 17246–17251. pmid:20855590
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[155] View Article

[156] PubMed/NCBI

[157] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Podolsky RD, Moran AL. Integrating function across marine life cycles. Integra Comp Biol. 2006; 46: 577–586.
View Article
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Allen RM, Buckley YM, Marshall DJ. Offspring size plasticity in response to intraspecific competition: an adaptive maternal effect across life-history stages. Amer Nat. 2008; 171: 225–337
View Article
Google Scholar

[162] View Article

[163] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Moran AI, McAlister JS. Egg size as a life history character of marine invertebrates: is it all it’s cracked up to be? Biol Bull. 2009; 216: 226–242. pmid:19556591
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[165] View Article

[166] PubMed/NCBI

[167] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. McCarthy MM, Crews D. Epigenetics—New Frontiers in neuroendocrinology. PLoS Genet. 2008; 29: 341–343.
View Article
Google Scholar

[169] View Article

[170] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Crews D. Epigenetic, brain, behaviour, and the environment. Hormones. 2010; 9: 41–50. pmid:20363720
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[172] View Article

[173] PubMed/NCBI

[174] Google Scholar

[ref58] 58. Wilson ME, Sengoku T. Developmental regulation of neuronal genes by DNA methylation: environmental influences. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2013; pmid:23501000.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[176] View Article

[177] PubMed/NCBI

[178] Google Scholar

[ref59] 59. Navarro-Martin L, Vinas J, Ribas I, Diaz N, Gutierrez A, DiCrose L, et al. DNA Methylation of the gonadal. PLoS Genet. 2011; 7: e1002447. pmid:22242011
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[180] View Article

[181] PubMed/NCBI

[182] Google Scholar

[ref60] 60. Vandegehuchte MB, Janssen CR. Epigenetics in an ecotoxicological context. Mutat Res-Gen Tox En. 2014; 764–765: 36–45.
View Article
Google Scholar

[184] View Article

[185] Google Scholar

[ref61] 61. Riviere G. Epigenetic features in the oyster Crassostrea gigas suggestive of functionally relevant promotor DNA methylation in invertebrates. F Phys. 2014; 5: 1–7.
View Article
Google Scholar

[187] View Article

[188] Google Scholar

[ref62] 62. Pespini MH, Sanford E, Gayord B, Hill TM, Hosfelt JD, Jaris HK, et al. Evolutionary change during experimental ocean acidification. PNAS. 2013; 110 (17): 6937–6942. pmid:23569232
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[190] View Article

[191] PubMed/NCBI

[192] Google Scholar

[ref63] 63. Calosi P, Rastrick SPS, Lombardi C, De Guzman HJ, Davidson L, Jahnke M, et al. Adaptation and acclimatization to ocean acidification in marine ectotherms: an in situ transplant experiment with polychaetes at a shallow CO₂ vent system. Phil Trans R Soc BS. 2013; 368: 20120444.
View Article
Google Scholar

[194] View Article

[195] Google Scholar

[ref64] 64. Ellis RP, Bersey J, Rundle SD, Hall-Spencer JM, Spicer JI. Subtle but significant effects of CO₂ acidified seawater on embryos of the intertidal snail, Littorina obtusata. Aquat Biol. 2009; 5: 41–48.
View Article
Google Scholar

[197] View Article

[198] Google Scholar

[ref65] 65. Walther K, Satoris FJ, Bock C, Pörtner HO. Impact of anthropogenic ocean acidification on thermal tolerance of the spider crab Hyas araneus. Biogeosciences. 2009; 6: 2207–2215.
View Article
Google Scholar

[200] View Article

[201] Google Scholar

[ref66] 66. Pörtner HO, Farrell AP. Physiology and climate change. Science. 2008; 322: 690–692.
View Article
Google Scholar

[203] View Article

[204] Google Scholar

[ref67] 67. Byrne M. Impact of ocean warming and ocean acidification on marine invertebrate life history stages: vulnerabilities and potential for persistence in a changing ocean. Oceano. Mar. Biol: Ann. Rev. 2011; 49: 1–42.
View Article
Google Scholar

[206] View Article

[207] Google Scholar

[ref68] 68. Hettinger A, Sanford E, Hill TM, Hosfelt JD, Russell AD, Gaylord B. The influence of food supply on the response of Olympia oyster larvae to ocean acidification. Biogeosciences. 2013; 10: 5781–5802.
View Article
Google Scholar

[209] View Article

[210] Google Scholar

[ref69] 69. Videla JA, Chaparro OR, Thompson RJ, Concha II. Role of biochemical energy reserves in the metamorphosis and early juvenile development of the oyster Ostrea chilensis. Mar Biol. 1998; 132: 635–640.
View Article
Google Scholar

[212] View Article

[213] Google Scholar

[ref70] 70. Melzner F, Stange P, Trübenbach K, Thomsen J, Casties I, Panknin U, et al. Food supply and seawater pCO2 impact calcification and internal shell dissolution in the blue mussel Mytilus edulis. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e24223. pmid:21949698
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[215] View Article

[216] PubMed/NCBI

[217] Google Scholar

[ref71] 71. Thomsen J, Casties I, Pansch C, Körtzinger A, Melzner F. Food availability outweighs ocean acidification effects in juvenile Mytilus edulis: Laboratory and field experiments. Global Change Biol. 2013;
View Article
Google Scholar

[219] View Article

[220] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Parental generation adults to F1 larvae

F1 adults to F2 larvae and juveniles

Determination of extracellular pH (pHe) and SMR in F1 Adults.

F2 Larval development.

F2 Juvenile Spat.

Manipulation of carbonate chemistry

Data analysis

Results

F1 Adults

F2 larvae and spat

Survival of larvae.

Development of larvae.

Shell length of larvae.

Shell length and heart rate of spat.

Discussion

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References

Determination of extracellular pH (pH_e) and SMR in F1 Adults.