Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Correction: Caesarean Delivery and Subsequent Stillbirth or Miscarriage: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • The PLOS ONE Staff

There is an error in the last sentence of the Data synthesis section of the Abstract. The correct sentence is: No study reported adjusted estimates in the miscarriage review, therefore results are presented individually.

There is an error in the 13th sentence of the Characteristics of Studies Included in the Miscarriage Review section of the Results. The correct sentence is: No study in the miscarriage review reported adjusting for potential confounders.

There is an error in the last sentence of the Miscarriage subsection of the Heterogeneity Assessment in the Results. The correct sentence: Furthermore, no study adjusted for confounding.

The third to last sentence in the first paragraph of the discussion should be removed.

There is an error in the second sentence of the second paragraph in the Strengths and Limitations of the Review section of the Discussion. The correct sentence is: No study adjusted for confounders in the miscarriage review and so a meta-analysis was not performed as a result.

There are errors in Table 5. The Confounding Factor Bias and Analytical Bias columns for Smith et al (2006) are incorrect. Please see the correct table here:

thumbnail
Table 5. Quality assessment of studies included in the miscarriage review.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072420.t005

Reference

  1. 1. McConville A, Law BS, Mahony MJ (2013) Are Regional Habitat Models Useful at a Local-Scale? A Case Study of Threatened and Common Insectivorous Bats in South-Eastern Australia. PLoS ONE 8(8): e72420