Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Thermogenesis, Flowering and the Association with Variation in Floral Odour Attractants in Magnolia sprengeri (Magnoliaceae)

  • Ruohan Wang,

    Affiliation National Engineering Laboratory for Tree Breeding, Key Laboratory for Genetics and Breeding of Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants, Ministry of Education, College of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University,Beijing, China

  • Sai Xu,

    Affiliations National Engineering Laboratory for Tree Breeding, Key Laboratory for Genetics and Breeding of Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants, Ministry of Education, College of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University,Beijing, China, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

  • Xiangyu Liu,

    Affiliation Lab of Systematic Evolution and Biogeography of Woody Plants, College of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University,Beijing, China

  • Yiyuan Zhang,

    Affiliation National Engineering Laboratory for Tree Breeding, Key Laboratory for Genetics and Breeding of Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants, Ministry of Education, College of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University,Beijing, China

  • Jianzhong Wang,

    Affiliation National Engineering Laboratory for Tree Breeding, Key Laboratory for Genetics and Breeding of Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants, Ministry of Education, College of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University,Beijing, China

  • Zhixiang Zhang

    zxzhang@bjfu.edu.cn

    Affiliation Lab of Systematic Evolution and Biogeography of Woody Plants, College of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University,Beijing, China

Thermogenesis, Flowering and the Association with Variation in Floral Odour Attractants in Magnolia sprengeri (Magnoliaceae)

  • Ruohan Wang, 
  • Sai Xu, 
  • Xiangyu Liu, 
  • Yiyuan Zhang, 
  • Jianzhong Wang, 
  • Zhixiang Zhang
PLOS
x

Abstract

Magnolia sprengeri Pamp. is an ornamentally and ecologically important tree that blooms at cold temperatures in early spring. In this study, thermogenesis and variation in the chemical compounds of floral odours and insect visitation in relation to flowering cycles were studied to increase our understanding of the role of floral thermogenesis in the pollination biology of M. sprengeri. There were five distinct floral stages across the floral cycle of this species: pre-pistillate, pistillate, pre-staminate, staminate and post-staminate. Floral thermogenesis during anthesis and consisted of two distinct peaks: one at the pistillate stage and the other at the staminate stage. Insects of five families visited M. sprengeri during the floral cycle, and sap beetles (Epuraea sp., Nitidulidae) were determined to be the most effective pollinators, whereas bees (Apis cerana, Apidae) were considered to be occasional pollinators. A strong fragrance was released during thermogenesis, consisting of 18 chemical compounds. Although the relative proportions of these compounds varied at different floral stages across anthesis, linalool, 1-iodo-2-methylundecane and 2,2,6-trimethyl-6-vinyltetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-ol were dominant. Importantly, we found that the floral blends released during the pistillate and staminate stages were very similar, and coincided with flower visitation by sap beetles and the two thermogenic episodes. Based on these results, we propose that odour acts as a signal for a reward (pollen) and that an odour mimicry of staminate-stage flowers occurs during the pistillate stage.

Introduction

Recent studies have confirmed that thermogenic activity occurs in the reproductive organs of some flowering plants and is crucial for various phases of sexual reproduction, insect–plant interactions and the adaptation of plants to environmental conditions [1]. Thermogenesis is not a by-product of floral development but has been suspected to serve specific functions such as the volatilisation of floral fragrances [2],[3], enhanced blooming in cool weather [4], inflorescence unfolding, pollen maturation or release [5], provision of a warm environment for pollinating insects that temporarily reside in the flower [6],[7] and facilitation of fertilisation and seed set [8].

Thermogenic activity occurs in various structures of many plant families, including the cones of gymnosperms (Cycadaceae and Zamiaceae) and flowers or inflorescences of some angiosperms (Annonaceae, Araceae, Arecaceae, Aristolochiaceae, Cyclanthaceae, Hydnoraceae, Illiceaceae, Magnoliaceae, Nelumbonaceae, Nymphaeaceae, Rafflesiaceae, and Schisandraceae) [9][14]. Previous studies on the families Araceae and Nelumbonaceae have focused on patterns of thermogenesis in terms of pollination biology, fertilisation and the biochemical regulation of heat production [15],[16], while only a few reports have linked thermogenic activity with the release of odours [2],[7],[17].

Magnolia species are early diverging angiosperms having thermogenic flowers with floral cycles of 2–4 days [18][20]. In these species, thermogenesis during anthesis commonly consists of two episodes, which are related to the male and female phases, respectively, in Magnolia species [3],[17],[21]. Floral fragrances are emitted during the anthesis of Magnolia [22],[23], and the scents are generally dominated by one chemical class of compounds, e.g. monoterpenes, benzenoids or hydrocarbons [23],[24]. In addition, pollination biology has been extensively studied, with beetles regarded as major pollinators [17],[22],[25]. Thermogenesis, floral scent emission and insect visitation occur simultaneously during anthesis, but our current knowledge of these phenomena in Magnolia is primarily derived from independent studies of thermogenesis patterns, floral scent and the species of visiting insects [22],[23],[26]. Very few combined studies have been performed to explore the relationship of thermogenesis with insect–plant interactions in Magnoliaceae or how thermogenesis is related to floral odour [3],[10],[17].

In our study, we focused on the association between thermogenesis and floral odour attractants in Magnolia sprengeri. Based on a description of the floral cycle, temperature measurements of floral thermogenicity and analyses of floral odour compounds, we investigated the visiting insects during different flowering stages and the relationships among floral thermogenesis, floral scent and pollinator visitation. The mutual relationships among thermogenic activity, variation in floral odour compounds and visiting frequency of pollinators during flowering uncovered in this study will increase our understanding of how Magnoliaceae ensures reproductive success at low temperatures in early spring.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

We obtained permission to perform this investigation from the Dalaoling National Nature Reserve Bureau, Hubei Province, China. No specific permission was required for this study since it did not involve any endangered or protected species in the sampled area.

Study site and plant material

Magnolia sprengeri (Magnoliaceae) is an indigenous species distributed mainly in Shaanxi Province, west Hubei Province and the north-east part of Guizhou Province in China [27][29]. This study was conducted at Dalaoling Natural Reserve (30°50′–30°92′N, 110°52′–110°85′E) in Hubei Province, China. There are four distinct seasons in the study area, though spring and autumn are comparatively longer. The climate is moderate and humid, with 900–1500 mm of annual precipitation. In this population, M. sprengeri trees grow to 20–30 m in height and 20–30 cm in diameter at breast height. The trees typically flower from mid-March to the end of April, with peak blooming in mid-April.

Determination of the floral cycle

This study was conducted from March 18 to April 26 of 2012. Movements of the petals, stigmas and anthers of individual flowers were recorded every day at anthesis for 30 flowers. The floral cycle was determined according to these floral characteristics.

Insect visitation to flowers

Visiting insects were recorded during anthesis for 46 flowers on two trees (23 flowers per tree). This experiment was initiated on April 10, 2012. During the daytime, insects were collected in polyethylene bags (Reynolds, Lake Forest, IL, USA) from 10:00 to 18:30 at intervals of 1.5–2.0 h. At night, before the flowers closed to form a temporary chamber, we smeared Vaseline (Fuda Company, China), which is colourless, odourless and viscous, evenly to the basement of the inner petals to trap visiting insects. The trapped insects were collected the following morning. The insects collected were totalled by floral stages. As individual flowers had very small variation (<1.5 h) in the duration of anthesis and floral stages (Table 1), we divided the floral stages of the 46 flowers as follows: pre-pistillate stage, 10:00 day 1 (April 10) to 10:00 day 2; pistillate stage, 10:00 day 2 to 18:30 day 2; pre-staminate stage, 18:30 day 2 to 10:00 day 3; staminate stage, 10:00 day 3 to 18:00 day 3; and post-staminate stage, 18:30 day 3 to 10:00 day 4. All collected insects were sent for identification to the Beijing Natural History Museum or the Institute of Zoology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

thumbnail
Table 1. Description of the flowering stages of individual flowers of Magnolia sprengeri.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099356.t001

As sap beetles and bees visited the flowers at both the pistillate and staminate stages (see results), suggesting that they were potential pollinators, we made additional observations of the visiting frequencies of sap beetles and bees to flowers at the pistillate and staminate stages. On April 15, 2012, 3 flowers at the pistillate stage and 3 flowers at the staminate stage were arbitrarily chosen in an individual tree. During the experiment, we made 0.5-h-long observations every 1.5 h. We recorded the number of sap beetles and bees landing on the chosen flowers.

Floral thermogenesis

The floral temperature of 20 individual anthetic flowers on one tree was measured at 0.5-h intervals. A portable infrared thermal imaging radiometer [Ti55FT and FlexCam (≤0.5°C under 30°C); Fluke, Everett, WA, USA] was used to record the locations of flowers with the highest temperatures upon opening. Then, floral and ambient temperatures were recorded using thermocouples (0.3 mm in diameter) connected to a portable, battery-powered, digital thermometer (OS 685 L; Omega, Stamford, CT, USA) accurate to ±0.5°C. The thermocouples were inserted into the tissue at the basal part of the inner petals and gynoecium, which showed the highest temperature according to infrared thermal imaging radiometry (see the result). Each measurement was repeated three times, and the mean value was recorded. The air-temperature probe was hung freely at the same height. The flowers were shaded to avoid any influence from sunflecks and wind.

Floral scents

Odour production was studied during the flowering period under natural conditions. Seven flowers were arbitrarily selected in the middle canopy of one tree, and floral scents were collected and analysed for each of the seven flowers during the five floral stages (10:00 for the pre-pistillate stage, 15:00 and 18:00 for the pistillate stage, 10:00 for the pre-staminate stage, 15:00 and 18:00 for the staminate stage and 08:00 for the post-staminate stage).

Floral odours were collected using the dynamic headspace technique [2]. Each flower was enclosed in a polyethylene bag (Reynolds), and the open end of the bag was bound around the stalk. The scent was collected in a glass tube containing 60 mg of Tenax-GR (mesh 80/100; CAMSCO, Houston, TX, USA) connected to the bag with an odourless silicone tube. Air was pumped at 200 ml/min. Circumambient air without flowers was collected as a control in the same manner. The trapped floral scents were stored in a freezer at −20°C before analysis. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was performed using a TurboMatrix 650 ATD thermal desorber, and a Clarus 600 gas chromatograph (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled to a Clarus 600 mass spectrometer (Perkin-Elmer). The gas chromatographic column used was the DB-5MS (30 m×0.25 mm×0.25 µm; Clarus 600, Perkin-Elmer). The temperature was kept at 50°C for 8 min, programmed to 5°C/min to 150°C, and finally raised to 250°C at 10°C/min where it was kept for 8 min. The split value was 20∶1. Data analysis was performed using NIST 08 with TurboMass ver. 5.4.2.

Data analysis

Floral scents were compared among stages by nonparametric multivariate analyses of variance (npMANOVA) [30] with the function adonis() from the vegan package in R [31] using the factors “flower”, “stage” and their interactions. If the npMANOVA revealed a significant effect of the factor “stage” on floral scents, post hoc tests were performed. Post hoc tests consisted of npMANOVAs with a Bonferroni correction. Such npMANOVA and post hoc tests were performed on the relative % of the three dominant compounds, then on the relative percentages of those compounds representing more than 1% of total blend.

Results

Determination of the floral cycle

Flowers of M. sprengeri appeared before the leaves, and were erect, cup-shaped and 15 cm wide with 12–14 petals that were white to rosy red in colour. The flowers were protogynous and the anthesis of an individual flower lasted for almost 4 days. According to the movements of the petals, stigmas and anthers of the flowers, the floral cycle could be divided into five distinct stages: pre-pistillate, pistillate, pre-staminate, staminate and post-staminate (Table 1). The pre-pistillate stage commenced 1 day before flower opening and ended in the following morning at 10:00–11:00. During this stage, the outer petals opened first, followed by the internal petals (Fig. 1A). Upon opening, the outer petals were initially held erect along with the inner petals, and then opened fully at 11:00 when the pistillate stage commenced. At the pistillate stage, the flowers were functionally female: the pistil was open and the receptive stigmas produced nectar-like exudates (Fig. 1B). The pistillate stage lasted until 18:30 in the afternoon. The flowers then closed to form a floral chamber (Fig. 1D), entering the pre-staminate stage. This stage was characterised by open stamens with non-dehisced anthers and a closed stigma (Fig. 1C) and lasted until 10:00–11:00 of the following morning. Then, the flower reopened, the surfaces of the stigmas shrank and the anthers began to dehisce, which indicated the start of the staminate stage (Fig. 1E). After about 11.5 h of pollen shedding, the stigmas began to turn brown and wither (Fig. 1F), which was indicative of the onset of the post-staminate stage.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Morphology of an individual flower of Magnolia sprengeri at the pre-pistillate (A), pistillate (B), pre-staminate (C, D), staminate (E) and post-staminate (F) stages.

(A) Pre-pistillate stage: petals folded tightly with pistils opened. (B) Pistillate stage: functionally female flowers with receptive stigmas and immature stamens with no dehiscent anthers. (C) and (D) Pre-staminate stage: a floral chamber with appressed and unreceptive stigmas and non-dehiscent anthers. (E) Staminate stage: functionally male flowers with gynoecium starting to fade; stamens detached from the axis and the anthers dehisced. (F) Post-staminate stage: withered flowers with the petals and stamens becoming brown and abscised; the stigma withered. Abbreviations: An, androecium; Gy, gynoecium; Ip, inner petals; Op, outer petals; Tw, twig.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099356.g001

Floral pollinators

The floral visitors to M. sprengeri included bibionid flies (Bibio sp., Bibionidae, Diptera), sap beetles (Epuraea sp., Nitidulidae, Coleoptera), bees (Apis cerana, Apidae, Hymenoptera), paper wasps (Polistes chinensis, Vespidae, Hymenoptera) and brown lacewings (Hemerobiidae, Neuroptera) (Table 2 and Fig. 2). Different insects visited the flowers at different floral stages (Table 2). The visiting frequencies of some insects varied during the anthesis. At the pre-pistillate stage, many bibionid flies (Bibio sp.) landed on the bud surfaces (Fig. 2A), particularly on partly exposed petals. However, they were absent during the pistillate stage; 187 sap beetles (Epuraea sp.) were observed both in the pistillate and staminate stages (Fig. 2B) and 89 of them landed on the pistillate-stage flowers and crawled on the stamens and gynoecia without foraging pollen (no pollen was produced during the pistillate stage). During the staminate stage, we recorded 72 sap beetles; some of them stayed inside the flowers for longer than 30 min and then flew into the loose stamens. We observed pollen on their bodies in both the pistillate and staminate stage flowers (Fig. 2B). Therefore, they were considered to be the most effective pollinators of M. sprengeri.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Flower-visiting insects at different stages of anthesis.

(A) Aggregation of Bibio sp. on the surface of a swollen bud during the pre-pistillate stage. (B) Epuraea sp. foraging for pollen when the anthers were dehisced. (C) Polistes chinensis in a floral chamber at the staminate stage. (D) Brown lacewing (Hemerobiidae, Neuroptera) (left) and Epuraea sp. (right) crawling on the inner petals during the staminate stage. (E) Apis cerana foraging for pollen at the post-staminate stage.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099356.g002

thumbnail
Table 2. Number of floral visitors to 46 Magnolia sprengeri flowers observed during the five floral stages.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099356.t002

In addition, bees (A. cerana) also visited flowers at both the pistillate and staminate stages; however, when compared with sap beetles, far fewer bees were observed at the pistillate stage (Fig. 3). Thus, they were considered to be occasional pollinators. The majority of flies (Bibio sp.) were observed on the surface of swollen buds during the pre-pistillate stage; a small number of paper wasps (P. chinensis) and brown lacewings (Hemerobiidae) also foraged at the staminate and post-staminate stages (Fig. 2C and D), but none of them visited pistillate-stage flowers. Thus, these insects were not considered effective pollinators.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Visiting frequencies of sap beetles and bees on Magnolia sprengeri flowers at pistillate and staminate stages.

The observation was conducted on 6 flowers. Sap beetles and bees landing on the observed flowers for half an hour were recorded at an interval of 1.5

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099356.g003

Floral thermogenesis

Thermogenesis in M. sprengeri consisted of two distinct peaks (Fig. 4). The first peak occurred between 12:00 and 18:30 on the second day of anthesis, corresponding with the pistillate stage when stigmas were receptive (Fig. 4). During this peak, the floral temperature was 1.0–5.5°C above the ambient air temperature (Fig. 4). The second peak occurred between 14:00 and 18:30 in the third day of anthesis. This peak was lower (0.9–4.1°C) and synchronised with pollen liberation and dispersion during the staminate stage.

thumbnail
Figure 4. Changes in temperatures and floral scents of Magnolia sprengeri during anthesis.

(A) Records of Magnolia sprengeri flower temperature (red line) and ambient air temperature (green line) during anthesis. (B) Difference between flowers and air temperature. (C) Relative proportions of dominant compounds (contributing to >5% of the blend) of M. sprengeri floral scents during the five flowering stages*. In (A), pictures a and b are infrared images of a M. sprengeri flower during the pistillate (a) and the staminate stages (b). Bar scales represent 1.5 cm in image a and 2 cm in image b. Colours indicate the temperature distribution. The red colour in the centre of the flower corresponds to the highest temperature. In (B), the same lowercase letters indicate no significant difference (p>0.05) in odour compounds between the floral stages according to the npMANOVA post hoc tests. Error bars indicate standard errors. Stage 1, pre-pistillate stage; Stage 2, pistillate stage; Stage 3, pre-staminate stage; Stage 4, staminate stage; Stage 5, post-staminate stage. * Relative proportions of chemical compounds accounting to >1% of the total floral scents differed significant (p<0.05) among all 7 samples.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099356.g004

Floral scent variation during different stages of flowering

Magnolia sprengeri flowers produced a strong fragrance. Floral scent analyses were conducted during the four developmental stages (Table 3). In total, 18 compounds were identified in the floral scents. Three compounds, linalool, 1-iodo-2-methylundecane and 2,2,6-trimethyl-6-vinyltetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-ol (epoxylinalool), accounted for more than 5% of the total scent of each sample (Table 3). These compounds were considered dominant compounds.

thumbnail
Table 3. Retention time and relative proportions (%) of chemical compounds identified in scents collected on 7 M. sprengeri flowers at different flowering stages (values in this table are means±s.e.).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099356.t003

As expected, floral stage was an important factor influencing the relative amount of compounds in floral scents (p = 0.001; Table 4). Table 4 clearly shows that no significant difference in the odour compounds was detected among the seven flowers sampled (p = 0.558). In addition, the interaction between “floral stage” and “flower” showed no significant cross effect on the compounds within floral scents (p = 0.922; Table 4), meaning that the variation in odour between the stages was the same for each flower. According to the post hoc tests, the scent composition of different floral stages was significantly different (Fig. 4C). With regard to the dominant compounds, the scents sampled at 15:00 during the pistillate stage were not significantly different to those sampled at 15:00 during the staminate stage. Such similarity was also found in floral scents sampled at 18:00 during the pistillate and staminate stages (Fig. 4C).

thumbnail
Table 4. Summary of the npMANOVA for the odour compounds of seven flowers sampled at the five floral stages. d.f.  =  degrees of freedom.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099356.t004

Discussion

Similar to other early diverging angiosperms [12],[19],[32], the flowers of M. sprengeri are bisexual, protogynous, fragrant and pollinated by insects (especially beetles). When the flowers opened for the first time during the daytime, they were functionally female with a receptive stigma and non-dehiscent stamen. The flowers then closed overnight, forming floral chambers, until their reopening the following morning. In some thermogenic plants, e.g. Philodendron solimoesense and Symplocarpus foetidus, heated floral chambers provide shelter for beetle pollinators where they can mate, feed and pollinate the flowers at night during cold periods, and benefit from the energy provided by the flower's heat in the cool mornings [6],[33],[34]. In our study, some sap beetles remained inside the floral chambers at night during the pre-staminate stage. We thus suggest that M. sprengeri flowers may act as shelter for sap beetles during the cold night.

Heat production in gynoecia of M. sprengeri flowers occurred during anthesis and consisted of two distinct peaks. Distinct heating patterns have been reported in different thermogenic species [35],[36]. In some thermogenic plants, floral temperature is maintained at a constant range, independent of ambient temperature, for a long period throughout anthesis [8],[35],[36]. Floral temperature stability of these plants is achieved by means of physiological thermoregulation [35],[36]. In this study, floral temperature of M. sprengeri changed constantly throughout anthesis and major thermogenic episodes were short, which indicated that M. sprengeri was not thermoregulated. Our result is in agreement with a previous study on floral thermogenesis of M. ovata in Brazil [3].

Thermogenesis is generally linked to volatilisation of floral scent [37]. Like many other Magnolia species [23], floral scent was emitted during the thermogenesis of M. sprengeri. Floral scents have been well documented to play an important role in plant–pollinator interactions through various effects on visiting insects, e.g. as a feeding cue and nectar guide [38]. Beetles are important pollinators of many early diverging angiosperms, including Magnolia [32]. In this study, we found that many sap beetles (Epuraea sp.) visited M. sprengeri flowers at both the pistillate and staminate stages and were identified as effective pollinators. When the sap beetles were in the flowers, they were frequently observed foraging pollen grains during the staminate stages. We thus concluded that the floral odours of M. sprengeri may act as a signal of food resources for sap beetles.

Floral scents are complexes of chemical compounds [39], and different odours are selected by different insects [2],[40]. Intriguingly, we found a similarity in dominant compounds of floral scents at pistillate and staminate stages in M. sprengeri. In a previous study, Gottsberger et al. also reported a smell similarity between pistillate and staminate stage flowers of M. ovata [17]. In addition, it has been hypothesized that staminate stage flowers mimic pistillate stage flowers in M. hypoleuca, as the former offers no pollen reward but has strong fragrance [19]. Our study validates odour mimicry between the female and the male stage flowers in a Magnolia species by experimental data. As no food reward for pollinators exists at the female stage, this mimicry might be an adaptive strategy for Magnolia species to attract pollinators at both stages, ensuring successful pollination.

Patterns of heating may also be a crucial aspect of the adaptive strategies of M. sprengeri. Because thermogenesis promotes the volatilization of floral scents, which are cues for insects signifying the presence of food resources, the production of heat by thermogenic plants when pollinators are active might be a more “efficient” strategy. We found that this species flowers in early spring and their flowers produce heat in daytime, which is well synchronised with the activity of its pollinator (sap beetles, Epuraea, Nitidulidae) [41],[42]. In some other Magnolia species (e.g. M. tamaulipana [22] and M. ovata [3],[17]), thermogenesis peaks occur at night. As reported previously, M. tamaulipana and M. ovata generally grow in wet and warm habitats occupied by Cyclocephala (Dynastinae, Scarabaeidae), which are active at night [17],[22]. Considering these results, one can reasonably conclude that the divergence in thermogenesis patterns among various Magnolia species is linked to the activity of their pollinators, but further evidence is needed to support this idea.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Dechang Cao in Beijing Forestry University for his help in data analysis and we are grateful to RTKB Technology Co., Ltd for the use of their thermographic imaging equipment. The authors also thank Prof. Roger S. Seymour in University of Adelaide, Australia and an anonymous reviewer for their valuable comments.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: RW ZZ JW. Performed the experiments: RW XL SX YZ. Analyzed the data: RW SX ZZ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SX YZ. Wrote the paper: RW SX XL ZZ. Provided crucial suggestions on the experiment: ZZ JW.

References

  1. 1. Seymour RS, Ito Y, Onda Y, Ito K (2009) Effects of floral thermogenesis on pollen function in Asian skunk cabbage Symplocarpus renifolius. Biology Letters 5: 568–570.
  2. 2. Kumano-Nomura Y, Yamaoka R (2009) Beetle visitations, and associations with quantitative variation of attractants in floral odors of Homalomena propinqua (Araceae). Journal of Plant Research 122: 183–192.
  3. 3. Seymour RS, Silberbauer-Gottsberger I, Gottsberger G (2010) Respiration and temperature patterns in thermogenic flowers of Magnolia ovata under natural conditions in Brazil. Functional Plant Biology 37: 870–878.
  4. 4. Knutson RM (1974) Heat production and temperature regulation in eastern skunk cabbage. Science 186: 746–747.
  5. 5. Albre J, Quilichini A, Gibernau M (2003) Pollination ecology of Arum italicum (Araceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 205–214.
  6. 6. Seymour RS, White CR, Gibernau M (2003) Environmental biology: heat reward for insect pollinators. Nature 426: 243–244.
  7. 7. Meeuse BD, Raskin I (1988) Sexual reproduction in the arum lily family, with emphasis on thermogenicity. Sexual Plant Reproduction 1: 3–15.
  8. 8. Li JK, Huang SQ (2009) Flower thermoregulation facilitates fertilization in Asian sacred lotus. Annals of Botany 103: 1159–1163.
  9. 9. Endress PK (1994) Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge, England ; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. 511 p. p.
  10. 10. Küchmeister H, Webber AC, Silberbauer-Gottsberger I, Gottsberger G (1998) Pollination and its relationship to thermogenesis in species of Arecaceae and Annonaceae of central Amazonia. Acta Amazonica 28: 217–245.
  11. 11. Ervik F, Barfod A (1999) Thermogenesis in palm inflorescences and its ecological significance. Acta Botanica Venezuelica 22: 195–212.
  12. 12. Thien LB, Azuma H, Kawano S (2000) New perspectives on the pollination biology of basal angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: 225–235.
  13. 13. Seymour RS, Maass E, Bolin JF (2009) Floral thermogenesis of three species of Hydnora (Hydnoraceae) in Africa. Annals of Botany 104: 823–832.
  14. 14. Takacs S, Bottomley H, Andreller I, Zaradnik T, Schwarz J, et al. (2009) Infrared radiation from hot cones on cool conifers attracts seed-feeding insects. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276: 649–655.
  15. 15. Seymour RS, Blaylock AJ (2000) Stigma peroxidase activity in association with thermogenesis in Nelumbo nucifera. Aquatic Botany 67: 155–159.
  16. 16. Wagner AM, Krab K, Wagner MJ, Moore AL (2008) Regulation of thermogenesis in flowering Araceae: the role of the alternative oxidase. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1777: 993–1000.
  17. 17. Gottsberger G, Silberbauer-Gottsberger I, Seymour RS, Dotterl S (2012) Pollination ecology of Magnolia ovata may explain the overall large flower size of the genus. Flora 207: 107–118.
  18. 18. Thien LB (1974) Floral biology of Magnolia. American Journal of Botany 61: 1037–1045.
  19. 19. Kikuzawa K, Mizui N (1990) Flowering and Fruiting Phenology of Magnolia hypoleuca. Plant Species Biology 5: 255–261.
  20. 20. Wang RH, Jia H, Wang JZ, Zhang ZX (2010) Flowering and pollination patterns of Magnolia denudata with emphasis on anatomical changes in ovule and seed development. Flora 205: 259–265.
  21. 21. Wang RH, Liu XY, Mou SL, Xu S, Zhang ZX (2013) Temperature regulation of floral buds and floral thermogenicity in Magnolia denudata (Magnoliaceae). Trees 27: 1755–1762.
  22. 22. Dieringer G, Cabrera L, Lara M, Loya L, Reyes-Castillo P (1999) Beetle pollination and floral thermogenicity in Magnolia tamaulipana (Magnoliaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 160: 64–71.
  23. 23. Azuma H, Thien LB, Kawano S (1999) Floral scents, leaf volatiles and thermogenic flowers in Magnoliaceae. Plant Species Biology 14: 121–127.
  24. 24. Azuma H, Toyota M, Asakawa Y, Yamaoka R, Garcia-Franco JG, et al. (1997) Chemical divergence in floral scents of Magnolia and allied genera (Magnoliaceae). Plant Species Biology 12: 69–83.
  25. 25. Ishida K (1996) Beetle pollination of Magnolia praecocissima var. borealis. Plant Species Biology 11: 199–206.
  26. 26. Yasukawa S, Kato H, Yamaoka R, Tanaka H, Arai H, et al. (1992) Reproductive and pollination biology of Magnolia and its allied genera (Magnoliaceae). I. Floral volatiles of several Magnolia and Michelia species and their roles in attracting insects. Plant Species Biology 7: 121–140.
  27. 27. Nadel H, PeÑA JE (1994) Identity, behavior, and efficacy of nitidulid beetles (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) pollinating commercial Annona species in Florida. Environmental Entomology 23: 878–886.
  28. 28. Xia NH, Liu YH, Nooteboom HP (2008) Magnoliaceae, in Flora of China. In: ZY Wu, PH Raven, and DY Hong, editor. Beijing and St. Louis: Science Press and Missouri Botanical Garden Press. pp. 48–91.
  29. 29. Kang Y, Ejder E (2011) Magnolia sprengeri Pamp.: morphological variation and geographical distribution. Plant Biosystems 145: 906–923.
  30. 30. Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26: 32–46.
  31. 31. R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.
  32. 32. Lamprecht I, Schmolz E, Blanco L, Romero CM (2002) Flower ovens: thermal investigations on heat producing plants. Thermochimica Acta 391: 107–118.
  33. 33. Sapir Y, Shmida A, Ne'eman G (2006) Morning floral heat as a reward to the pollinators of the Oncocyclus irises. Oecologia 147: 53–59.
  34. 34. Seymour RS (2004) Dynamics and precision of thermoregulatory responses of eastern skunk cabbage Symplocarpus foetidus. Plant, Cell & Environment 27: 1014–1022.
  35. 35. Seymour RS, Lindshau G, Ito K (2010) Thermal clamping of temperature-regulating flowers reveals the precision and limits of the biochemical regulatory mechanism. Planta 231: 1291–1300.
  36. 36. Seymour RS, Gibernau M (2008) Respiration of thermogenic inflorescences of Philodendron melinonii: natural pattern and responses to experimental temperatures. Journal of Experimental Botany 59: 1353–1362.
  37. 37. Raguso RA (2008) Wake up and smell the roses: the ecology and evolution of floral scent. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 39: 549–569.
  38. 38. Endress PK (2010) The evolution of floral biology in basal angiosperms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365: 411–421.
  39. 39. Suinyuy TN, Donaldson JS, Johnson SD (2013) Patterns of odour emission, thermogenesis and pollinator activity in cones of an African cycad: what mechanisms apply? Annals of Botany 112: 891–902.
  40. 40. Terry I, Walter GH, Moore C, Roemer R, Hull C (2007) Odor-mediated push-pull pollination in cycads. Science 318: 70.
  41. 41. Proches S, Johnson SD (2009) Beetle pollination of the fruit-scented cones of the South African cycad Stangeria eriopus. American Journal of Botany 96: 1722–1730.
  42. 42. Tomimatsu H, Ohara M (2003) Floral visitors of Trillium camschatcense (Trilliaceae) in fragmented forests. Plant Species Biology 18: 123–127.